Documentation expert panel LU - QALLL

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Documentation of expert panels - The validation of the training reference framework and its continuous adaptation to changing needs is done by the sector representatives (construction and building industry). - There is a networking between training professionals, training providers and sector representatives with regard to the annual adaptation of the training reference framework in the building and constructing industry. - The project EQF aims at defining a national quality framework (NQF) by defining different job skills. The implementation is aimed at preparing the European Credit System for Vocational Education and Training (ECVET). III.4 Recommendations Following the strengths, weaknesses, opportunities and threats that were agreed in the panel discussions on quality assurance in training and education with the experts, a certain number of issues should be dealt further in the future. On the national level - Facilitation of skills’ recognition gateways (skills equivalences) in a certain number of jobs (e.g. level B2 in construction is equivalent to a DAB level, …) - Learning outcomes in adult education and vocational training are linked to an obligation of results. It would be necessary to link the learning outcomes in initial training above an obligation of means to the necessity of results. - The qualification for teachers and trainers in initial and vocational training should require a related working experience. - The validation system of experience skills (VAE) should be promoted in a broader way. - The qualification efforts and possibilities offered for vocational development in the craft sector and building industry should be communicated more systematically On the institutional and/or on the European level IV Additional comments Here you can give additional comments , e.g. on the process of organising and conducting the expert panel. Mention features that are relevant also to the topic, i.e. if it was very difficult (or very easy) to find suitable experts, whether opinions and experiences were very varied or rather homogenous, etc. Positive points: - Exchange of good practice: as the participants were very diversified, this WG allowed them to know of each other’s practices in the field of quality. - Positive feedback – the WG could be considered as a first step to a national dialogue on QA in the VET sector. Difficulties: - Participation: 8 out of 14 organisations had confirmed their participation though only 6 participated in the end. - Type of organisations: we choose specifically to have a very diversified public in terms of type of organisations. Along the discussions it was difficult to establish common benchmarks. - Time: so to short, it was not possible to plan a whole day event due to the disponibility of the experts. Gutknecht-Gmeiner, IMPULSE 2011 4
Documentation of expert panels - V Annex Invitation and programme List of participants Any further relevant documents Gutknecht-Gmeiner, IMPULSE 2011 5
Page 1 and 2: Quality Assurance in Lifelong Learn
Page 3: Documentation of expert panels Plan

Documentation expert panel LU - QALLL

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?