Vol. XVIII No. 1 August 2012 - JBLFMU Molo - John B. Lacson ...
Vol. XVIII No. 1 August 2012 - JBLFMU Molo - John B. Lacson ...
Vol. XVIII No. 1 August 2012 - JBLFMU Molo - John B. Lacson ...
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Editorial<br />
<strong>August</strong> <strong>2012</strong><br />
Ellaine Apple M. Cabrobias<br />
Editor-in-chief<br />
Ma. Katherine V. Cañon<br />
Associate Editor<br />
Mdpwn. Kate Mergell M. Nullada<br />
Managing Editor<br />
Mdpn. Daren Ril P. Valenzuela<br />
News Editor<br />
Mark P. Almelia<br />
News Writer<br />
Mdpn. Angelo S. Calama-an<br />
Feature Editor<br />
Mdpn. Jade V. Dedoroy<br />
Feature Writer<br />
Mdpn. Christian Jave G. Pagayon<br />
Sports Editor<br />
Mdpn. Vincent M. Lagradante<br />
Sports Writer<br />
Mdpwn. Meriel V. Robles<br />
Literary Editor<br />
Mdpn. <strong>John</strong> Rey P. Arroyo<br />
Literary Writer<br />
Mdpn. Jose Mico C. Tambalo<br />
Filipino Editor<br />
Mdpn. Angelo P. Ragasa<br />
Filipino Writer<br />
Mdpn. Joshua M. Angaray<br />
Mdpn. Deo Paolo E. Lagunday<br />
Cartoonists<br />
Gian Niño E. Genoveza<br />
Layout Artist<br />
Mdpn. Michael P. Tantay<br />
Mdpn. Ed Anthony N. Longno<br />
Photojournalists<br />
Ms. Moiselle B. Nagnal<br />
Dr. <strong>No</strong>nie C. Maravillas<br />
Advisers<br />
EDITORIAL POLICY<br />
The Seagull is published<br />
twice every semester, with the<br />
publication office at <strong>John</strong> B.<br />
<strong>Lacson</strong> Foundation Maritime<br />
University – <strong>Molo</strong>, Inc., <strong>Molo</strong>, Iloilo<br />
City. Articles contained herein<br />
are personal views of the authors<br />
and do not necessarily reflect<br />
the official views and opinions of<br />
the staff and/or provide an open<br />
forum for discussion. We accept<br />
original articles and contribution<br />
from students, faculty, and staff.<br />
Comments and suggestions<br />
regarding our issues are warmly<br />
welcomed. Articles submitted<br />
must be typewritten with sufficient<br />
space and margin.<br />
Just a matter of acceptance and readiness<br />
The muddled thoughts from<br />
students and teachers regarding the<br />
adoption of a more student centered<br />
teaching mechanism known as Output-<br />
Based Teaching and Learning this school<br />
year determines the experimentation<br />
subject to more introduction.<br />
OBTL evaluates the student’s<br />
competency through assessment<br />
tasks, laboratory, reports, and handson<br />
activities where they can learn and<br />
generate new ideas. Also, under the<br />
program, the focus is on the measurement<br />
of students’ performance by requiring<br />
them to demonstrate what they have<br />
learned from resources or inputs, thus<br />
also measuring the effectiveness of the<br />
instructors.<br />
In spite of this fact, there is however<br />
a contradiction as to the readiness of<br />
the school in the implementation of the<br />
new teaching philosophy which perhaps<br />
means a full revision of the university’s<br />
curriculum.<br />
In as much as the students are<br />
in bewilderment to their role in class<br />
discussion, the method also requires<br />
the preparedness of the university as it<br />
needs sufficient time for adjustments<br />
especially in the change of teaching<br />
technique of the instructors and facilities<br />
to be used like assessment materials and<br />
multimedia facilities. Since it is the first<br />
time that the school uses the OBTL, there<br />
might be uncertainties that the program<br />
may not be effective through time.<br />
Meanwhile, the university asserts<br />
that through OBTL, students’ competency<br />
is measured as well as their confidence<br />
and communication skills are enhanced.<br />
The fact that it aims to foster education, it<br />
finds OBTL an effective teaching method<br />
that will uplift the quality of graduates<br />
that the institution will be producing.<br />
Since the implementation of<br />
Output-Based Teaching and Learning<br />
has just pioneered in the university,<br />
necessary arrangements, orientations,<br />
trainings, and the like are essential to<br />
educate and to prepare the <strong>Lacson</strong>ians<br />
– both the teachers and students. Proper<br />
motivation is also crucial in order not to<br />
turn the boon into bane.<br />
The problem isn’t really the visible<br />
loopholes of the method but our manner<br />
of accepting and eventually adapting<br />
to the program without adequate<br />
preparations. If the experiment aims<br />
to improve the academic efficiency<br />
of the university, we need to assure<br />
our readiness to comply with the<br />
requirements of the new technique in<br />
order to keep ourselves abreast with the<br />
objective.<br />
5