28.12.2014 Views

The green infrastructure valuation toolkit user guide

The green infrastructure valuation toolkit user guide

The green infrastructure valuation toolkit user guide

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Building natural value for sustainable economic development: <strong>The</strong> <strong>green</strong> <strong>infrastructure</strong> <strong>valuation</strong> <strong>toolkit</strong> <strong>user</strong> <strong>guide</strong><br />

Adapting cities for climate change: the role<br />

of <strong>green</strong> <strong>infrastructure</strong>. Gill, Handley et al,<br />

2007<br />

Evaluating Green Roof Energy<br />

Performance. Jeffrey Sonne, Ashrae<br />

Journal 2006<br />

Carbon stored and sequestered in<br />

woodland and forest (including soils)<br />

Carbon storage and sequestration in soils<br />

Key benefit transfer values<br />

Average heating energy savings per tree<br />

Further research needed<br />

c.10tC/ha for grassland - further research<br />

needed<br />

1.3% (Chicago)<br />

3-9% (UK)<br />

emissions if natural gas was the heating fuel. This study also suggests that the<br />

benefit would be more significant in buildings with curtain walls of which U-value<br />

is much lower than a standard wall and in residential buildings.<br />

Further work is needed to provide useable values for the carbon stored in<br />

different land use types, including soils. This is very complex and context-specific<br />

– there is great variety in soil type and usage, and hydrology, climate and ecology<br />

are important factors. It is unrealistic to expect highly accurate estimates to be<br />

possible for all land-use types, but it should be possible to obtain better ‘ball park’<br />

figures for broad groups.<br />

4 Wong N. et al, 2003. Investigation of thermal benefits of rooftop gardens in the tropical<br />

KNOWLEDGE GAPS<br />

<strong>The</strong> main area for further work is clarification of the current research - to bring<br />

together a consistent view on the science - and work to link temperature rises on<br />

economic activity, measured by gross value added. Coupled with work cited here<br />

on using <strong>green</strong> <strong>infrastructure</strong> to adapt to climate change, this would allow an<br />

estimate to be made of the gross value added impact of urban <strong>green</strong>ing<br />

strategies, influencing <strong>green</strong> roofs, tree planting and <strong>green</strong> space<br />

protection/enhancement.<br />

Further work is also desirable to model local impacts of <strong>green</strong> <strong>infrastructure</strong> on<br />

local temperature regulation in the UK, to inform tree planting strategies in<br />

relation to species type, location, scale of planting and so on.<br />

UK based evidence on the cooling impact of trees on buildings could help<br />

complete tool 1.5. A number of bespoke academic studies have also been<br />

undertaken in the UK and elsewhere assessing the cooling impact of trees on<br />

particular buildings, however it is difficult to generalise findings:<br />

<strong>The</strong> Centre for Urban Forestry Research (part of the US Forest Service, a USDA<br />

agency) reports that well placed, mature trees can save consumers up to 30% of<br />

annual cooling costs and save 10-25% of energy used for heating 20 .<br />

Royal Institute of Chartered Surveyors sponsored research 21 finds that based on<br />

the typical UK climate, the savings on energy costs from <strong>green</strong> roof installation<br />

are negligible, with the energy savings possible with a 10cm deep <strong>green</strong> roof<br />

capable of being delivered with just 3mm extra insulation.<br />

Another study 22 predicted 4.45% annual heating energy savings for a typical<br />

office building in Scotland, equivalent to a reduction of 400 kg of annual CO2<br />

environment. Building and Environment 38: 267-270.<br />

5<br />

Nowak, McPherson and Rowntree, Chicago’s urban forest ecosystem: results of the<br />

Chicago urban forest climate project, USDA,1994<br />

6<br />

Gill, Handley et al, Adapting cities for climate change: the role of <strong>green</strong> <strong>infrastructure</strong>, 2007<br />

7<br />

Rawlings for DETR, Environmental rules of thumb, 1999<br />

8<br />

Gill, Handley et al, Adapting cities for climate change: the role of <strong>green</strong> <strong>infrastructure</strong>,<br />

2007<br />

9<br />

Jacobs, Valuing England’s terrestrial ecosystems services, 2008<br />

10<br />

Natural England, Research report NERR026: Carbon management by land and marine<br />

managers, 2008<br />

11<br />

Brainard, Lovett and Bateman, Carbon sequestration benefits of woodland, 2003<br />

12<br />

Nowak, McPherson and Rowntree, Chicago’s urban forest ecosystem: results of the<br />

Chicago urban forest climate project, USDA,1994<br />

13<br />

Defra, Safeguarding our soils, 2009<br />

14<br />

Macha, D., and L. Cihacek.. Carbon storage in plant and soil components of selected<br />

grass monocultures. AnMtgsAbsts2009.53321. ASA, CSSA, SSSA, Madison WI, 2009<br />

15<br />

Chang et al, 2007 "A preliminary study on the local cool-island intensity of Taipei city<br />

parks." Landscape and Urban Planning 80(4): 386-395.<br />

16<br />

Yu and Hien, 2006, <strong>The</strong>rmal benefits of city parks. Energy and Buildings 38, 105-120.<br />

17<br />

Heisler, Energy savings with trees, 1986 and Jones (2003) cited in Landscape<br />

consultants (2004)<br />

18<br />

Forestry Commission<br />

25

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!