09.11.2012 Views

The Dative – an Oblique Case

The Dative – an Oblique Case

The Dative – an Oblique Case

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Help me-DAT a minute your father-DAT in the kitchen<br />

‘I w<strong>an</strong>t you to help your father in the kitchen’<br />

d. Der David hat mir der Claudia schon zuviele Geschenke gegeben<br />

the D. has me-DAT the C.-DAT already too m<strong>an</strong>y presents given<br />

‘I think, David has already given too m<strong>an</strong>y presents to Claudia’<br />

Apart from this, there is one argument left for <strong>an</strong>alysing dative as structural case: the so-called<br />

‘kriegen’-passive. M<strong>an</strong>y authors claim that dative case has to be structural because dative<br />

objects c<strong>an</strong> be passivized:<br />

37. Der Vermieter kriegt einen Brief geschickt<br />

<strong>The</strong> l<strong>an</strong>dlord gets a letter sent<br />

Either ‘the l<strong>an</strong>dlord is given a letter’ or<br />

‘a letter is sent for the l<strong>an</strong>dlord’ or<br />

‘the l<strong>an</strong>dlord m<strong>an</strong>ages to send a letter’<br />

First of all, the ‘kriegen’-passive is debated controversially. It is less but clear if a sentence like<br />

(37.) is best <strong>an</strong>alysed as a predicative construction or as a passive. Second, free datives c<strong>an</strong> be<br />

passivized as well:<br />

38. Der Vermieter kriegt das Zimmer geputzt<br />

<strong>The</strong> l<strong>an</strong>dlord gets the room cle<strong>an</strong>ed<br />

‘<strong>The</strong> room is cle<strong>an</strong>ed for the l<strong>an</strong>dlord’<br />

Third, ‘kriegen’-passive may be seen as evidence that dative case c<strong>an</strong> be absorbed <strong>an</strong>d the<br />

caseless NP moves into a nominative case position where it receives (or has to check)<br />

nominative case. But being absorbable might not be <strong>an</strong> exclusive property of structural cases.<br />

In the linguistic literature, passive constructions have been taken as evidence for structural case<br />

w.r.t. the l<strong>an</strong>ding site of case movement, but rarely w.r.t. the absorbed case. 15 But in Germ<strong>an</strong>,<br />

there are no examples where a NP has been moved into a (structural) dative case position.<br />

Parallel examples c<strong>an</strong> be found both for nominative (passive) <strong>an</strong>d accusative (ECMconstructions).<br />

<strong>The</strong>refore, ‘kriegen’-passive is no convincing argument for dative as structural<br />

case. Note further that dative objects c<strong>an</strong>not undergo middle formation in Germ<strong>an</strong>, either.<br />

A further problem for a treatment of dative as structural case is the following asymmetry:<br />

39. a. Wir bedauern Reag<strong>an</strong>s Wiederwahl<br />

We regret Reag<strong>an</strong>’s reelection-ACC<br />

b. Wir messen Reag<strong>an</strong>s Wiederwahl große Bedeutung bei<br />

We attribute Reag<strong>an</strong>’s reelection-DAT great signific<strong>an</strong>ce to<br />

‘We attribute great signific<strong>an</strong>ce to Reag<strong>an</strong>’s reelection’<br />

40. a. Wir bedauern, daß Reag<strong>an</strong> wiedergewählt wurde<br />

We regret that Reag<strong>an</strong> reelected was<br />

b. *Wir messen große Bedeutung bei, daß Reag<strong>an</strong> wiedergewählt wurde<br />

We attribute great signific<strong>an</strong>ce to that Reag<strong>an</strong> reelected was<br />

Some verbs (like bedauern, cf. 39.a) that select a proposition as object assign accusative to<br />

this object, others (like beimessen, cf. 39.b) assign dative. <strong>The</strong> propositional object c<strong>an</strong> be<br />

realized as a CP only with accusative assigning verbs (40.). F<strong>an</strong>selow <strong>an</strong>d Felix (1987) explain<br />

this contrast with the same case theoretic distinction between structural <strong>an</strong>d oblique case that<br />

we use. Interestingly, when ‘passivized’, the CP is no longer ruled out even with the dative<br />

assigning verb (Webelhuth 1990:45):

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!