29.12.2014 Views

wEyG1

wEyG1

wEyG1

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

SECTION A<br />

USE OF THE HAGUE SYSTEM<br />

A.7<br />

Refusals of<br />

international registrations<br />

Figure A.7.1 Refusals of international<br />

registrations<br />

Refusals of international registrations<br />

231<br />

Designated offices can refuse to grant protection for an<br />

international registration where the registration is subject<br />

to opposition from a third party, and when it fails to meet<br />

the necessary criteria, such as novelty, as specified in<br />

national laws. If an office refuses to grant protection, it<br />

must notify the IB of this decision within the applicable<br />

time limit, usually six months from the date on which the<br />

registration was published in the International Designs<br />

Bulletin (IDB).<br />

Figure A.7.1 presents the total number of refusals received<br />

by the IB since 2005. The bar chart shows considerable<br />

year-on-year variation in numbers of refusals. In 2013, a<br />

total of 119 refusals were issued, which is considerably<br />

lower than the peak witnessed in 2011 (231), but higher<br />

than the 82 issued in 2012.<br />

Number of refusals<br />

98<br />

39 36 40<br />

191<br />

2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013<br />

Year<br />

139<br />

Refusals of international registrations by<br />

designated Hague member (%), 2013<br />

82<br />

119<br />

Refusals represent only a small fraction of total designations.<br />

For the 2005-13 period, refusals represented less<br />

than 1% of all designations in registrations. This is partly<br />

due to the fact that a number of offices do not carry out<br />

substantive examination and, therefore, automatically<br />

issue protection for designs barring opposition by third<br />

parties. A small number of Hague members accounted<br />

for the majority of these refusals. Of the 119 refusals in<br />

2013, Egypt accounted for 27.7% of the total, followed<br />

the Syrian Arab Republic (25.2%) and the Republic of<br />

Moldova (24.4%). Only six Hague members accounted<br />

for the large majority (95.8%) of all refusals.<br />

Egypt: 27.7% Syrian Arab Republic: 25.2%<br />

Republic of Moldova: 24.4% Armenia: 8.4%<br />

Estonia: 8.4% Georgia: 1.7%<br />

Others: 4.2%<br />

Source: WIPO Statistics Database, March 2014<br />

Figure A.7.2 depicts the refusals of international registrations<br />

for 2013 broken down by Locarno Classification.<br />

At least one Hague international registration was refused<br />

by a Hague member for 23 of the possible 32 classes.<br />

Class 9 (packages and containers) accounted for the<br />

largest number of refusals, followed by Class 32 (graphic<br />

symbols and logos) and Class 13 (tools and hardware).<br />

34

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!