29.12.2014 Views

DO PATENT POOLS ENCOURAGE INNOVATION? EVIDENCE ...

DO PATENT POOLS ENCOURAGE INNOVATION? EVIDENCE ...

DO PATENT POOLS ENCOURAGE INNOVATION? EVIDENCE ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Electric Generators Price-fixing; Divided world markets Restrictive agreements cancelled;<br />

Compulsory royalty-free licensing<br />

Lecithin<br />

Variable Condensers<br />

[Radio Tuning<br />

Devices]<br />

Allocated domestic market shares;<br />

Divided world markets; Threatened<br />

competitors with litigation<br />

Price-fixing; Denied licenses to<br />

competitors<br />

Restrictive agreements cancelled;<br />

Compulsory RAND and royalty-free<br />

licensing<br />

Dissolution of pool; Compulsory<br />

royalty-free licensing<br />

Aircraft Instruments Divided world markets Restrictive agreements cancelled;<br />

Compulsory RAND and royalty-free<br />

licensing<br />

Stamped Metal Wheels Price-fixing; Allocating distributors Restrictive practices enjoined;<br />

to manufacturers<br />

Compulsory RAND licensing<br />

Wrinkle Paint Finishes Price-fixing Restrictive agreements cancelled;<br />

Compulsory RAND licensing<br />

Fuse Cutouts Price-fixing Restrictive contracts cancelled;<br />

Ophthalmic Frames<br />

Furniture Slip Covers<br />

Price-fixing; Restricting the sale of<br />

frames to certain wholesalers<br />

Price-fixing; Denied licenses to<br />

competitors unless forced to<br />

Compulsory RAND licensing<br />

Restrictive agreements cancelled;<br />

Compulsory RAND and royalty-free<br />

licensing<br />

None: agreements dissolved prior to<br />

suit due to disagreement among pool<br />

members<br />

United States v. Westinghouse Electric Mfg. Co.,<br />

CCH Current Trade Cases 67,501 [D.C.N.J. Civil<br />

No. 5152; Complaint, 1945; Consent Judgment,<br />

1953].<br />

United States v. American Lecithin Co., CCH 1946-47<br />

Trade Cases 57,542 [N.D. Ohio Civil No. 24115;<br />

Complaint, 1946; Consent Judgment, 1947].<br />

United States v. General Instrument Corp., 87 F.<br />

Supp. 157, 194 [D.N.J. 1949]; United States v.<br />

General Instrument Corp., 115 F. Supp. 582 [D.N.J.<br />

1953].<br />

United States v. Bendix Aviation Corporation, CCH<br />

1946-47 Trade Cases 57,444 [D.C.N.J. Civil No.<br />

2531; Complaint, 1942, Consent Decree, 1946].<br />

United States v. Kelsey-Hayes Wheel Co. [E.D.Mich.<br />

Civil No. 10-655; Complaint, 1951].<br />

United States v. New Wrinkle, Inc., 1955 Trade Cases<br />

[C.C.H.] 68,203 [S.D. Ohio].<br />

United States v. Line Material Co., 333 U.S. 287, 305<br />

[1948].<br />

United States v. American Optical Co., CCH 1948-49<br />

Trade Cases 62,308 [S.D.N.Y. Civil No. 10-391;<br />

Complaint, 1940; Final Consent Judgment, 1948].<br />

United States v. Krasnov, 143 F. Supp. 184 [E.D.<br />

Penn., 1956].<br />

Notes: Data from license agreements, written complaints, and court opinions were collected from regional depositories of the National Archives in Chicago<br />

[railroad springs, machine tools, Phillips screws, lecithin, stamped metal wheels, wrinkle finishes, and fuse cutouts], Kansas City [ophthalmic frames], New York<br />

City [high tension cables, water conditioning apparatus, fuel injection equipment, pharmaceuticals, textile machinery, dry ice, electric equipment, variable<br />

condensers, aircraft instruments], and Riverside [color film]. Additional information on pool patents, member firms and licensees from LexisNexis. RAND refers<br />

to reasonable and non-discriminatory licensing.<br />

14

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!