Change in Flowability of Self-Compacting Concrete due to Pumping
Change in Flowability of Self-Compacting Concrete due to Pumping
Change in Flowability of Self-Compacting Concrete due to Pumping
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Rm<br />
2.2<br />
2.0<br />
1.8<br />
1.6<br />
1.4<br />
1.2<br />
1.0<br />
0.8<br />
0.6<br />
0.4<br />
0.2<br />
0.0<br />
5 m<strong>in</strong><br />
5 m<strong>in</strong><br />
3 m<strong>in</strong><br />
3 m<strong>in</strong><br />
1 m<strong>in</strong><br />
0.0 2.0 4.0 6.0 8.0<br />
Gm<br />
External force<br />
1 m<strong>in</strong>ute<br />
still<br />
A-1 A-2<br />
The relationship between the duration <strong>of</strong> apply<strong>in</strong>g<br />
the external force and the rate <strong>of</strong> change <strong>in</strong> the<br />
deformability is shown <strong>in</strong> (Fig. 8). The deformability<br />
was reduced <strong>due</strong> <strong>to</strong> the external force. When the<br />
water <strong>to</strong> cement ratio or the dosage <strong>of</strong> SP was high,<br />
the reduction <strong>in</strong> the deformability was small. It was<br />
found from the result that when Gm was large, the<br />
<strong>in</strong>fluence <strong>of</strong> external force was small. If the viscosity<br />
before apply<strong>in</strong>g external force was low, the change<br />
<strong>in</strong> Gm was also small.<br />
Rm<br />
Rm<br />
Fig. 5 <strong>Change</strong> <strong>in</strong> flowability <strong>due</strong> <strong>to</strong> external<br />
force: difference <strong>in</strong> SP dosage<br />
2.2<br />
2.0<br />
1.8<br />
1.6<br />
1.4<br />
1.2<br />
1.0<br />
0.8<br />
0.6<br />
0.4<br />
0.2<br />
0.0<br />
2.2<br />
2.0<br />
1.8<br />
1.6<br />
1.4<br />
1.2<br />
1.0<br />
0.8<br />
0.6<br />
0.4<br />
0.2<br />
0.0<br />
5 m<strong>in</strong><br />
5 m<strong>in</strong><br />
3 m<strong>in</strong><br />
1 m<strong>in</strong><br />
0.0 2.0 4.0 6.0 8.0<br />
5 m<strong>in</strong><br />
1 m<strong>in</strong><br />
3 and 5 m<strong>in</strong><br />
3 m<strong>in</strong><br />
Gm<br />
1 m<strong>in</strong><br />
3 m<strong>in</strong><br />
1 m<strong>in</strong><br />
still<br />
0.0 2.0 4.0 6.0 8.0<br />
Gm<br />
still<br />
A-1 B-1<br />
Fig. 6 <strong>Change</strong> <strong>in</strong> flowability <strong>due</strong> <strong>to</strong> external<br />
force: difference <strong>in</strong> water <strong>to</strong> cement ratio<br />
still<br />
A-1 C-1<br />
Fig. 7 <strong>Change</strong> <strong>in</strong> flowability <strong>due</strong> <strong>to</strong> external<br />
force: difference <strong>in</strong> water <strong>to</strong> cement ratio<br />
The rate <strong>of</strong> change <strong>of</strong> Rm is shown <strong>in</strong> Fig. 9. Rm<br />
<strong>of</strong> C-1 was reduced remarkably after one m<strong>in</strong>ute as<br />
well as Gm.<br />
.<br />
Rate <strong>of</strong> change <strong>of</strong> Gm (%)<br />
Rate <strong>of</strong> change <strong>of</strong> Rm (%)<br />
20<br />
0<br />
-20<br />
-40<br />
-60<br />
-80<br />
-100<br />
60<br />
50<br />
40<br />
30<br />
20<br />
10<br />
0<br />
-10<br />
-20<br />
-30<br />
-40<br />
A-1 A-2<br />
B-1 C-1<br />
0 1 2 3 4 5 6<br />
Action time <strong>of</strong> external force (m<strong>in</strong>)<br />
Fig. 8 Rate <strong>of</strong> change <strong>in</strong> deformability <strong>due</strong> <strong>to</strong><br />
external force<br />
A-1 A-2<br />
B-1 C-1<br />
0 1 2 3 4 5 6<br />
Action time <strong>of</strong> external force (m<strong>in</strong>)<br />
Fig. 9 Rate <strong>of</strong> change <strong>in</strong> viscosity <strong>due</strong> <strong>to</strong><br />
external force