Lubna Alam.pdf - IMBER
Lubna Alam.pdf - IMBER
Lubna Alam.pdf - IMBER
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Assessment of health safety from ingestion of<br />
Polonium-210 in Penaeus merguiensis from a<br />
coal burning power plant area of Malaysia<br />
<strong>Lubna</strong> <strong>Alam</strong>, Mazlin Bin Mokhtar & Che Abd. Rahim Mohamed<br />
Presented by<br />
Dr. <strong>Lubna</strong> <strong>Alam</strong>
Anthropogenic<br />
input & land run<br />
off<br />
Po-210<br />
Coal & Biomass<br />
burning
Coal<br />
39%<br />
34.21%<br />
Global energy<br />
production<br />
Malaysia<br />
6.7 billion<br />
ton/year<br />
Year 2030<br />
Next 2<br />
decades<br />
10 billion<br />
ton
there is very limited study about the spatial and seasonal variability of Po-210 in marine environment relating to the impact of coal burni<br />
Minor<br />
amount<br />
Uranium<br />
&<br />
Thorium<br />
100 times more<br />
radiation into the<br />
surrounding<br />
environment than a<br />
nuclear power<br />
plant
Penaeus merguiensis<br />
Surface water
Figure : Relationship between Total length and Po-210 concentration in<br />
Penaeus merguiensis
Trend of Po-210 concentration in organisms with the ambient water.
Impact on Human Health<br />
• BCF = Activity in specified tissue sample (Bqkg -1 ) / Activity in<br />
filtered water (Bql -1 )----- (1)<br />
• Daily intake (mBqday -1 person -1 ) = (AV x AP x 0.6) / (MP ×365)<br />
------- (2)<br />
• Dose (D) = DF × MF × Σ(Ai × Ci ×fi) ------ (3)<br />
• Risk = r×I [24] -------------- (4)
Po-210 uptake from water<br />
column<br />
Transfer parameter in assessment<br />
of public dose
Comparison of BCF in crustacean with the literature review.
Daily intake (mBqd-1person- 1 )<br />
100000<br />
World Ref. Value, 58000<br />
10000<br />
Marshal Islan1900<br />
Kalpakkam, 2070<br />
1000<br />
Japan, 690<br />
Kudankulam, 382<br />
Malaysia, 653.02<br />
100<br />
Mumbai, 31<br />
Poland, 42<br />
Poland, 27<br />
10<br />
Syria, 6.46<br />
1<br />
Mishra et al.<br />
(2009)<br />
Al-Masri et<br />
al. (2000)<br />
Yamamoto<br />
et al. (1994)<br />
Pietrzak-Flis<br />
et al. (1997)<br />
Skwarzec<br />
(1997)<br />
Locations<br />
Noshkin et<br />
al. (1994)<br />
Kannan et al<br />
2001 [<br />
Khan and<br />
Wesley<br />
(2011)<br />
Quan et al<br />
2008<br />
Present<br />
study<br />
Comparison of daily intake with the literature review
50% (0.32 Bq)<br />
Gastrointestinal tract (GI) model<br />
Ingestion<br />
(0.65 Bq)<br />
ST<br />
No<br />
absorption<br />
4 h<br />
ʎ ST<br />
SI<br />
50%<br />
ʎ B = f 1 ʎ SI /(1- f 1 )<br />
Blood<br />
(0.32 Bq)<br />
ʎ SI<br />
13 h<br />
ULI<br />
24 h<br />
ʎ ULI<br />
LLI<br />
Liver Spleen<br />
(0.09 Bq) (0.06 Bq)<br />
Red bone Other<br />
Kidneys<br />
marrow tissues<br />
(0.03 Bq (0.03 Bq (0.14Bq)<br />
ʎ LLI<br />
Excretion
Global average of annual radiation<br />
doses from natural radiation sources<br />
is 2400 µSv (UNSCEAR 2000).<br />
7.75%<br />
Nielsen et al. (1999) studied artificial radionuclide (Cs-137 and Sr-90) in the<br />
Baltic Sea marine environment and for a critical group, the maximum dose in<br />
humans was estimated to be 40-200 µSvyr -1 .
Dose (µSv/yr)<br />
10000<br />
1000<br />
100<br />
Cuba, 152<br />
W English Channel,78<br />
Kalpakkam, 1302<br />
Baltic sea, 700<br />
Italy, 200<br />
Gulf of Mannar, 2288<br />
Kudankulam, 166<br />
Malaysia,<br />
186.03<br />
10<br />
Mumbai, 19<br />
Ireland, 19<br />
Sudan, 4<br />
Mediterranean region, 20<br />
World Ref. value,<br />
7<br />
1<br />
Locations<br />
Comparison of CED with the literature review
Mortality risk < ICRP (2.5×10 -3 )<br />
Morbidity risk < ICRP (2.5×10 -3 )
Concluding remarks<br />
• Accumulation of Po-210 in marine Shrimp is<br />
dependent on ambient environment.<br />
• Shrimp consumption in Kapar coastal area of<br />
Malaysia is not at considerable risk
References<br />
• Mishra, S., Bhalke, S., Pandit, G. G. & Puranik, V. D. 2009. Estimation of 210Po and its risk to human beings due to consumption of marine species at<br />
Mumbai, India. Chemosphere 76(3): 402-406.<br />
• Al-Masri, M. S., Mamish, S., Budeir, Y. & Nashwati, A. 2000. 210Po and 210Pb concentrations in fish consumed in Syria. Journal of Environmental<br />
Radioactivity 49(3): 345-352.<br />
• Yamamoto, M., Abe, T., Kuwabara, J., Komura, K., Ueno, K. & Takizawa, Y. 1994. Polonium-210 and lead-210 in marine organisms: Intake levels for<br />
Japanese. Journal of Radioanalytical and Nuclear Chemistry 178(1): 81-90.<br />
• Pietrzak-Flis, Z., Chrzanowski, E. & Dembinska, S. 1997. Intake of 226Ra, 210Pb and 210Po with food in Poland. Science of the Total Environment 203(2):<br />
157-165.<br />
• Skwarzec, B. 1997. Polonium, uranium and plutonium in the Southern Baltic Sea. AMBIO 26(2): 113-117.<br />
• Noshkin, V. E., Robison, W. L. & Wong, K. M. 1994. Concentration of 210Po and 210Pb in the diet at the Marshall Islands. Science of the Total<br />
Environment 155(1): 87-104.<br />
• Kannan, V., Iyengar, M. A. R. & Ramesh, R. 2001. Dose estimates to the public from 210Po ingestion via dietary sources at Kalpakkam (India). Applied<br />
Radiation and Isotopes 54(4): 663-674.<br />
• Khan, M. & Wesley, S. 2011b. Tissue distribution of 210Po and 210Pb in select marine species of the coast of Kudankulam, southern coast of Gulf of<br />
Mannar, India. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment 175(1): 623-632.<br />
• Quan, W., Hongda, Z., Tiqiang, F. & Qingfen, L. 2008. Re-estimation of internal dose from natural radionuclides for Chinese adult men. Radiation<br />
Protection Dosimetry 130: 434-441.<br />
• Alonso-Hernandez, C., Diaz-Asencio, M., Munos-Caravaca, A., Suarez-Morell, E. & Avila-Moreno, R. 2002. 137Cs and 210Po dose assessment from<br />
marine food in Cienfuegos Bay (Cuba). Journal of Environmental Radioactivity 61(2): 203-211.<br />
• Connan, O., Germain, P., Solier, L. & Gouret, G. 2007. Variations of 210Po and 210Pb in various marine organisms from Western English Channel:<br />
contribution of 210Po to the radiation dose. Journal of Environmental Radioactivity 97(2-3): 168-188.<br />
• Pollard, D., Ryan, T. P. & Dowdall, A. 1998. The dose to Irish seafood consumers from 210Po. Radiation Protection Dosimetry 75(1-4): 139-142.<br />
• Nielsen, S. P., Bengtson, P., Bojanowsky, R., Hagel, P., Herrmann, J., Ilus, E., Jakobson, E., Motiejunas, S., Panteleev, Y., Skujina, A. & Suplinska, M. 1999.<br />
The radiological exposure of man from radioactivity in the Baltic Sea. Science of the Total Environment 237-238: 133-141.<br />
• Jia, G., Belli, M., Sansone, U., Rosamilia, S. & Blasi, M. 2003. 210Pb and 210Po concentrations in the Venice lagoon ecosystem (Italy) and the potential<br />
radiological impact to the local public and environment. Journal of Radioanalytical and Nuclear Chemistry 256(3): 513-528.<br />
• Hassona, R. K., Sam, A. K., Osman, O. I., Sirelkhatim, D. A. & LaRosa, J. 2008. Assessment of Committed Effective Dose due to consumption of Red Sea<br />
coral reef fishes collected from the local market (Sudan). Science of the Total Environment 393(2-3): 214-218.<br />
• Masilamani, V. 2001. Studies on the Bioaccumulation of Polonium-210 and Lead- 210 in the Biota of Gulf of Mannar, India. Ph.D. Thesis , Bharathidasan<br />
University, Tiruchirappalli.<br />
• IAEA-TECDOC-838. 1995. Sources of Radioactivity in the Marine Environment and their Relative Contributions to Overall Dose Assessment from Marine<br />
Radioactivity (MARDOS). Final Report of a Co-ordinated Research Programme. IAEA.
Contact<br />
Email: lubna762120@gmail.com<br />
Phone: +60146420690
Death of Mr. Alexander Litvinenko (former officer of<br />
the Russian Federal Security Service) by 2 Gbq of Po-<br />
210 = 10 µg of Po-210.<br />
Median lethal condition of Po-210 = 50 nanogram of<br />
Po-210<br />
Median lethal dose of acute radiation exposure = 4.5<br />
sv. (0.015 GBq)<br />
CED equivalent of Po-210 = 0.5 µsv/bq