30.12.2014 Views

Lubna Alam.pdf - IMBER

Lubna Alam.pdf - IMBER

Lubna Alam.pdf - IMBER

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Assessment of health safety from ingestion of<br />

Polonium-210 in Penaeus merguiensis from a<br />

coal burning power plant area of Malaysia<br />

<strong>Lubna</strong> <strong>Alam</strong>, Mazlin Bin Mokhtar & Che Abd. Rahim Mohamed<br />

Presented by<br />

Dr. <strong>Lubna</strong> <strong>Alam</strong>


Anthropogenic<br />

input & land run<br />

off<br />

Po-210<br />

Coal & Biomass<br />

burning


Coal<br />

39%<br />

34.21%<br />

Global energy<br />

production<br />

Malaysia<br />

6.7 billion<br />

ton/year<br />

Year 2030<br />

Next 2<br />

decades<br />

10 billion<br />

ton


there is very limited study about the spatial and seasonal variability of Po-210 in marine environment relating to the impact of coal burni<br />

Minor<br />

amount<br />

Uranium<br />

&<br />

Thorium<br />

100 times more<br />

radiation into the<br />

surrounding<br />

environment than a<br />

nuclear power<br />

plant


Penaeus merguiensis<br />

Surface water


Figure : Relationship between Total length and Po-210 concentration in<br />

Penaeus merguiensis


Trend of Po-210 concentration in organisms with the ambient water.


Impact on Human Health<br />

• BCF = Activity in specified tissue sample (Bqkg -1 ) / Activity in<br />

filtered water (Bql -1 )----- (1)<br />

• Daily intake (mBqday -1 person -1 ) = (AV x AP x 0.6) / (MP ×365)<br />

------- (2)<br />

• Dose (D) = DF × MF × Σ(Ai × Ci ×fi) ------ (3)<br />

• Risk = r×I [24] -------------- (4)


Po-210 uptake from water<br />

column<br />

Transfer parameter in assessment<br />

of public dose


Comparison of BCF in crustacean with the literature review.


Daily intake (mBqd-1person- 1 )<br />

100000<br />

World Ref. Value, 58000<br />

10000<br />

Marshal Islan1900<br />

Kalpakkam, 2070<br />

1000<br />

Japan, 690<br />

Kudankulam, 382<br />

Malaysia, 653.02<br />

100<br />

Mumbai, 31<br />

Poland, 42<br />

Poland, 27<br />

10<br />

Syria, 6.46<br />

1<br />

Mishra et al.<br />

(2009)<br />

Al-Masri et<br />

al. (2000)<br />

Yamamoto<br />

et al. (1994)<br />

Pietrzak-Flis<br />

et al. (1997)<br />

Skwarzec<br />

(1997)<br />

Locations<br />

Noshkin et<br />

al. (1994)<br />

Kannan et al<br />

2001 [<br />

Khan and<br />

Wesley<br />

(2011)<br />

Quan et al<br />

2008<br />

Present<br />

study<br />

Comparison of daily intake with the literature review


50% (0.32 Bq)<br />

Gastrointestinal tract (GI) model<br />

Ingestion<br />

(0.65 Bq)<br />

ST<br />

No<br />

absorption<br />

4 h<br />

ʎ ST<br />

SI<br />

50%<br />

ʎ B = f 1 ʎ SI /(1- f 1 )<br />

Blood<br />

(0.32 Bq)<br />

ʎ SI<br />

13 h<br />

ULI<br />

24 h<br />

ʎ ULI<br />

LLI<br />

Liver Spleen<br />

(0.09 Bq) (0.06 Bq)<br />

Red bone Other<br />

Kidneys<br />

marrow tissues<br />

(0.03 Bq (0.03 Bq (0.14Bq)<br />

ʎ LLI<br />

Excretion


Global average of annual radiation<br />

doses from natural radiation sources<br />

is 2400 µSv (UNSCEAR 2000).<br />

7.75%<br />

Nielsen et al. (1999) studied artificial radionuclide (Cs-137 and Sr-90) in the<br />

Baltic Sea marine environment and for a critical group, the maximum dose in<br />

humans was estimated to be 40-200 µSvyr -1 .


Dose (µSv/yr)<br />

10000<br />

1000<br />

100<br />

Cuba, 152<br />

W English Channel,78<br />

Kalpakkam, 1302<br />

Baltic sea, 700<br />

Italy, 200<br />

Gulf of Mannar, 2288<br />

Kudankulam, 166<br />

Malaysia,<br />

186.03<br />

10<br />

Mumbai, 19<br />

Ireland, 19<br />

Sudan, 4<br />

Mediterranean region, 20<br />

World Ref. value,<br />

7<br />

1<br />

Locations<br />

Comparison of CED with the literature review


Mortality risk < ICRP (2.5×10 -3 )<br />

Morbidity risk < ICRP (2.5×10 -3 )


Concluding remarks<br />

• Accumulation of Po-210 in marine Shrimp is<br />

dependent on ambient environment.<br />

• Shrimp consumption in Kapar coastal area of<br />

Malaysia is not at considerable risk


References<br />

• Mishra, S., Bhalke, S., Pandit, G. G. & Puranik, V. D. 2009. Estimation of 210Po and its risk to human beings due to consumption of marine species at<br />

Mumbai, India. Chemosphere 76(3): 402-406.<br />

• Al-Masri, M. S., Mamish, S., Budeir, Y. & Nashwati, A. 2000. 210Po and 210Pb concentrations in fish consumed in Syria. Journal of Environmental<br />

Radioactivity 49(3): 345-352.<br />

• Yamamoto, M., Abe, T., Kuwabara, J., Komura, K., Ueno, K. & Takizawa, Y. 1994. Polonium-210 and lead-210 in marine organisms: Intake levels for<br />

Japanese. Journal of Radioanalytical and Nuclear Chemistry 178(1): 81-90.<br />

• Pietrzak-Flis, Z., Chrzanowski, E. & Dembinska, S. 1997. Intake of 226Ra, 210Pb and 210Po with food in Poland. Science of the Total Environment 203(2):<br />

157-165.<br />

• Skwarzec, B. 1997. Polonium, uranium and plutonium in the Southern Baltic Sea. AMBIO 26(2): 113-117.<br />

• Noshkin, V. E., Robison, W. L. & Wong, K. M. 1994. Concentration of 210Po and 210Pb in the diet at the Marshall Islands. Science of the Total<br />

Environment 155(1): 87-104.<br />

• Kannan, V., Iyengar, M. A. R. & Ramesh, R. 2001. Dose estimates to the public from 210Po ingestion via dietary sources at Kalpakkam (India). Applied<br />

Radiation and Isotopes 54(4): 663-674.<br />

• Khan, M. & Wesley, S. 2011b. Tissue distribution of 210Po and 210Pb in select marine species of the coast of Kudankulam, southern coast of Gulf of<br />

Mannar, India. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment 175(1): 623-632.<br />

• Quan, W., Hongda, Z., Tiqiang, F. & Qingfen, L. 2008. Re-estimation of internal dose from natural radionuclides for Chinese adult men. Radiation<br />

Protection Dosimetry 130: 434-441.<br />

• Alonso-Hernandez, C., Diaz-Asencio, M., Munos-Caravaca, A., Suarez-Morell, E. & Avila-Moreno, R. 2002. 137Cs and 210Po dose assessment from<br />

marine food in Cienfuegos Bay (Cuba). Journal of Environmental Radioactivity 61(2): 203-211.<br />

• Connan, O., Germain, P., Solier, L. & Gouret, G. 2007. Variations of 210Po and 210Pb in various marine organisms from Western English Channel:<br />

contribution of 210Po to the radiation dose. Journal of Environmental Radioactivity 97(2-3): 168-188.<br />

• Pollard, D., Ryan, T. P. & Dowdall, A. 1998. The dose to Irish seafood consumers from 210Po. Radiation Protection Dosimetry 75(1-4): 139-142.<br />

• Nielsen, S. P., Bengtson, P., Bojanowsky, R., Hagel, P., Herrmann, J., Ilus, E., Jakobson, E., Motiejunas, S., Panteleev, Y., Skujina, A. & Suplinska, M. 1999.<br />

The radiological exposure of man from radioactivity in the Baltic Sea. Science of the Total Environment 237-238: 133-141.<br />

• Jia, G., Belli, M., Sansone, U., Rosamilia, S. & Blasi, M. 2003. 210Pb and 210Po concentrations in the Venice lagoon ecosystem (Italy) and the potential<br />

radiological impact to the local public and environment. Journal of Radioanalytical and Nuclear Chemistry 256(3): 513-528.<br />

• Hassona, R. K., Sam, A. K., Osman, O. I., Sirelkhatim, D. A. & LaRosa, J. 2008. Assessment of Committed Effective Dose due to consumption of Red Sea<br />

coral reef fishes collected from the local market (Sudan). Science of the Total Environment 393(2-3): 214-218.<br />

• Masilamani, V. 2001. Studies on the Bioaccumulation of Polonium-210 and Lead- 210 in the Biota of Gulf of Mannar, India. Ph.D. Thesis , Bharathidasan<br />

University, Tiruchirappalli.<br />

• IAEA-TECDOC-838. 1995. Sources of Radioactivity in the Marine Environment and their Relative Contributions to Overall Dose Assessment from Marine<br />

Radioactivity (MARDOS). Final Report of a Co-ordinated Research Programme. IAEA.


Contact<br />

Email: lubna762120@gmail.com<br />

Phone: +60146420690


Death of Mr. Alexander Litvinenko (former officer of<br />

the Russian Federal Security Service) by 2 Gbq of Po-<br />

210 = 10 µg of Po-210.<br />

Median lethal condition of Po-210 = 50 nanogram of<br />

Po-210<br />

Median lethal dose of acute radiation exposure = 4.5<br />

sv. (0.015 GBq)<br />

CED equivalent of Po-210 = 0.5 µsv/bq

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!