Hip and Knee Arthroplasty - Surface Hippy Guide to Hip Resurfacing

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Primary Conventional Total Hip Replacement Prostheses with a higher than anticipated Revision Rate Table HT47: Individual Primary Conventional Total Hip Prostheses identified as having a higher than anticipated Revision Rate Femoral/Acetabular Components Total Number Observed Component Years Revisions per 100 Observed Component Years Hazard Ratio P Value HR 95% CI Re-identified and no longer used Elite Plus/Charnley LPW 89 436 2.29 3.331 0.0001 (1.79, 6.20) Elite Plus/Apollo 52 277 2.53 3.808 0.0004 (1.81, 8.00) H Moos/Mueller 19 85 8.21 11.856
Table HT48: Yearly Cumulative Percent Revision of Individual Primary Conventional Total Hip Prostheses identified as having a higher than anticipated Revision Rate CPR 1 Yr 2 Yrs 3 Yrs 5 Yrs 7 Yrs Re-identified and no longer used Elite Plus/Charnley LPW 1.2 (0.2, 8.2) 4.9 (1.9, 12.4) 6.1 (2.6, 14.1) 11.3 (6.0, 20.6) 13.2 (7.2, 23.3) Elite Plus/Apollo 2.0 (0.3, 13.4) 4.0 (1.0, 15.1) 4.0 (1.0, 15.1) 12.5 (5.8, 25.9) 15.5 (7.6, 30.2) H Moos/Mueller 5.6 (0.8, 33.4) 11.1 (2.9, 37.6) 33.3 (16.6, 59.6) 38.9 (20.8, 64.7) 38.9 (20.8, 64.7) * Margron 5.8 (4.2, 7.8) 6.9 (5.2, 9.2) 7.5 (5.7, 9.9) 9.7 (7.3, 12.7) **Artek 2.9 (1.2, 6.7) 5.7 (3.1, 10.4) 8.1 (4.9, 13.2) 15.8 (11.1, 22.2) 20.1 (14.8, 27.0) **Inter-Op 9.1 (3.0, 25.6) 9.1 (3.0, 25.6) 12.1 (4.7, 29.1) 18.4 (8.7, 36.5) 18.4 (8.7, 36.5) **Revitan (non mod) 2.4 (0.6, 9.4) 6.1 (2.6, 14.0) 6.1 (2.6, 14.0) 9.1 (3.9, 20.7) Re-identified and still used F2L Multineck/Delta 5.6 (2.6, 12.0) 7.7 (3.9, 14.8) 7.7 (3.9, 14.8) * Profemur Z 6.2 (3.5, 10.9) 9.4 (5.9, 14.9) 12.2 (7.5, 19.7) ** MBA 4.2 (1.8, 9.7) 7.0 (3.5, 13.4) 9.0 (4.9, 16.1) 12.6 (7.1, 21.9) ** SPH-Blind 3.8 (2.8, 5.3) 4.7 (3.5, 6.3) 5.4 (4.1, 7.1) 6.8 (5.3, 8.8) Newly Identified Corail/ASR 2.1 (1.4, 3.1) 3.8 (2.6, 5.3) 4.5 (3.1, 6.6) *Adaptor (cemented) 7.1 (2.9, 16.7) 7.1 (2.9, 16.7) *Anca_Fit 4.6 (2.0, 10.1) 7.2 (3.0, 16.8) 7.2 (3.0, 16.8) *Hayes Consensus 3.2 (1.4, 7.0) 4.6 (2.3, 9.1) 4.6 (2.3, 9.1) * Lyderic II (cemented) 2.8 (0.7, 10.7) 6.4 (2.4, 16.3) 8.5 (3.6, 19.5) **Bionik 3.4 (1.7, 6.8) 4.2 (2.2, 8.3) Note: * Femoral Components ** Acetabular Components 97
Page 1 and 2:
Hip and Knee Arthroplasty ANNUAL RE
Page 3:
Australian Orthopaedic Association
Page 6 and 7:
PRIMARY PARTIAL KNEE REPLACEMENT...
Page 8 and 9:
PRIMARY TOTAL HIP REPLACEMENT......
Page 10 and 11:
PRIMARY TOTAL KNEE REPLACEMENT ....
Page 12 and 13:
viii
Page 14 and 15:
RIMARY TOTAL RESURFACING HIP REPLAC
Page 17 and 18:
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY This executive su
Page 19 and 20:
INTRODUCTION This is the eighth Ann
Page 21 and 22:
supply aggregate data and negotiati
Page 23 and 24:
PARTICIPATING HOSPITALS & COORDINAT
Page 25 and 26:
VICTORIA PUBLIC HOSPITALS Austin He
Page 27 and 28:
QUEENSLAND PUBLIC HOSPITALS Bundabe
Page 29 and 30:
WESTERN AUSTRALIA PUBLIC HOSPITALS
Page 31 and 32:
HIP REPLACEMENT GENERAL INTRODUCTIO
Page 33 and 34:
difference is also evident when com
Page 35 and 36:
Table HG2: Number of Hip Replacemen
Page 37 and 38:
Table HG4: Primary Hip Replacement
Page 39 and 40:
Table HG8: Primary Total Resurfacin
Page 41 and 42:
The use of monoblock prostheses in
Page 43 and 44:
PRIMARY PARTIAL HIP REPLACEMENT 1/9
Page 45 and 46:
Table HP2: 10 Most Common Unipolar
Page 47 and 48:
Table HP4: 10 Most Common Bipolar H
Page 49 and 50:
Table HP6: Primary Partial Hip Repl
Page 51 and 52:
Table HP14: Primary Partial Hip Rep
Page 53 and 54:
Table HP15: Primary Unipolar Monobl
Page 55 and 56:
Table HP19: Primary Bipolar Hip Rep
Page 57 and 58:
Table HP24: Primary Unipolar Monobl
Page 59 and 60:
Table HP28: Primary Bipolar Hip Rep
Page 61 and 62: Table HP32: Primary Unipolar Modula
Page 63 and 64: Table HP34: Primary Bipolar Hip Rep
Page 65 and 66: Primary Unipolar Modular Hip Replac
Page 67 and 68: Primary Bipolar Hip Replacement Pro
Page 69 and 70: PRIMARY TOTAL HIP REPLACEMENT The a
Page 71 and 72: Effect of Bearing Surface For the f
Page 73 and 74: since 2004. The three total resurfa
Page 75 and 76: combination has been used in 1,649
Page 77 and 78: Table HT2: Primary Conventional Tot
Page 79 and 80: Table HT6: 10 Most Common Femoral C
Page 81 and 82: Table HT8: 10 Most Common Femoral C
Page 83 and 84: Table HT10: 10 Most Common Acetabul
Page 85 and 86: Table HT12: 10 Most Common Primary
Page 87 and 88: Primary Conventional Total Hip Repl
Page 89 and 90: Table HT19: Primary Conventional To
Page 93 and 94: Figure HT18: Cumulative Percent Rev
Page 105 and 106: Primary Total Resurfacing Hip Repla
Page 107 and 108: Table HT39: Primary Total Resurfaci
Page 109 and 110: Table HT41: Primary Total Resurfaci
Page 111: Table HT45: Primary Total Resurfaci
Page 115 and 116: Figure HT34-43: Cumulative Percent
Page 117 and 118: Primary Total Resurfacing Hip Repla
Page 119 and 120: REVISION HIP REPLACEMENT This repor
Page 121 and 122: REVISION HIP REPLACEMENT 1/9/1999 -
Page 123 and 124: ‘Revision of Known Primary’ Hip
Page 125 and 126: Table HR10: Outcomes of ‘Revision
Page 127 and 128: knee increased from 29.4% in 2003 t
Page 129 and 130: Table KG2: Number of Knee Replaceme
Page 131 and 132: Table KG4: Primary Knee Replacement
Page 133 and 134: PRIMARY PARTIAL KNEE REPLACEMENT Th
Page 135 and 136: Effect of Age and Gender The risk o
Page 137 and 138: Primary Partial Resurfacing Knee Re
Page 139 and 140: Table KP6: Primary Patella/Trochlea
Page 141 and 142: Table KP12: Primary Unicompartmenta
Page 149 and 150: Primary Patella/Trochlear Knee Repl
Page 151 and 152: Figure KP11-14: Cumulative Percent
Page 153 and 154: decrease in use and now accounts fo
Page 155 and 156: as having a higher than anticipated
Page 157 and 158: Table KT2: 10 Most Common Femoral C
Page 159 and 160: Table KT4: 10 Most Common Femoral C
Page 161 and 162: Figure KT5: Trends in Prosthesis Fi
Page 163 and 164:
Table KT10: Primary Total Knee Repl
Page 165 and 166:
Figure KT10: Primary Total Knee Rep
Page 167 and 168:
Page 169 and 170:
Page 171 and 172:
Table KT23: Yearly Cumulative Perce
Page 173 and 174:
Page 175 and 176:
Page 177 and 178:
Table KT30: Primary Unicompartmenta
Page 179 and 180:
Page 181 and 182:
Page 183 and 184:
Figure KT24-KT33: Cumulative Percen
Page 185 and 186:
REVISION KNEE REPLACEMENT This repo
Page 187 and 188:
p
Page 189 and 190:
Figure KR1: Trends in Usage for Rev
Page 191 and 192:
‘Revision of Known Primary’ Kne
Page 193 and 194:
Table KR10: Outcome of ‘Revision
Page 195 and 196:
Table KR14: Outcome of ‘Revision
Page 197 and 198:
CEMENT IN HIP AND KNEE REPLACEMENT
Page 199 and 200:
CEMENT IN HIP AND KNEE REPLACEMENT
Page 201 and 202:
Table C3: Top 10 Cements used in Re
Page 203 and 204:
Table C7: Yearly Cumulative Percent
Page 205 and 206:
Table C11: Yearly Cumulative Percen
Page 207 and 208:
MORTALITY FOLLOWING PRIMARY HIP AND
Page 209 and 210:
Table M5: Mortality following Prima
Page 211 and 212:
Appendices APPENDIX 1 Glossary of S
Page 213 and 214:
APPENDIX 2 Patient Consent and Conf
Page 215 and 216:
INTRODUCTION - about the Registry A
Page 217 and 218:
APPENDIX 5 ICD-10-AM Codes PRIMARY
show all

Hip and Knee Arthroplasty - Surface Hippy Guide to Hip Resurfacing

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?