Hip and Knee Arthroplasty - Surface Hippy Guide to Hip Resurfacing

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Table KT34: Yearly Usage of Individual Primary Total Knee Prostheses identified as having a higher than anticipated Revision Rate Year of Implant 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 Re-identified and no longer used Gemini MK II/ Gemini MK II 0 0 4 10 7 Genesis II Oxinium Cless/Genesis II 0 0 7 8 102 Genesis II Oxinium Cless /MBK 0 0 0 22 66 Interax/Interax 10 30 18 Profix Oxinium Cless /MBK 0 0 0 63 95 Profix Oxinium Cless /Profix 0 0 0 10 61 Trac/Trac 7 36 52 33 9 1 Re-identified and still used Optetrak-PS/Optetrak 0 14 22 90 130 155 252 253 216 Profix/Mobile Bearing Knee 0 0 55 214 204 349 269 54 60 Newly Identified AMK/AMK 34 92 70 3 2 1 Genesis II Oxinium PS Cted/Genesis II 0 0 0 14 74 454 701 948 1132 IB II/IB II 0 64 90 33 12 Optetrak-PS/Optetrak-RBK 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 81 174 Rotaglide Plus/ Rotaglide Plus 0 0 56 125 151 110 101 43 30 TC-Plus/TC-Plus 0 0 0 0 1 27 27 6 6 166
Figure KT24-KT33: Cumulative Percent Revision of Individual Primary Total Knee Prostheses identified as having a higher than anticipated Revision Rate Re-identified and still used 167
Page 1 and 2:
Hip and Knee Arthroplasty ANNUAL RE
Page 3:
Australian Orthopaedic Association
Page 6 and 7:
PRIMARY PARTIAL KNEE REPLACEMENT...
Page 8 and 9:
PRIMARY TOTAL HIP REPLACEMENT......
Page 10 and 11:
PRIMARY TOTAL KNEE REPLACEMENT ....
Page 12 and 13:
viii
Page 14 and 15:
RIMARY TOTAL RESURFACING HIP REPLAC
Page 17 and 18:
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY This executive su
Page 19 and 20:
INTRODUCTION This is the eighth Ann
Page 21 and 22:
supply aggregate data and negotiati
Page 23 and 24:
PARTICIPATING HOSPITALS & COORDINAT
Page 25 and 26:
VICTORIA PUBLIC HOSPITALS Austin He
Page 27 and 28:
QUEENSLAND PUBLIC HOSPITALS Bundabe
Page 29 and 30:
WESTERN AUSTRALIA PUBLIC HOSPITALS
Page 31 and 32:
HIP REPLACEMENT GENERAL INTRODUCTIO
Page 33 and 34:
difference is also evident when com
Page 35 and 36:
Table HG2: Number of Hip Replacemen
Page 37 and 38:
Table HG4: Primary Hip Replacement
Page 39 and 40:
Table HG8: Primary Total Resurfacin
Page 41 and 42:
The use of monoblock prostheses in
Page 43 and 44:
PRIMARY PARTIAL HIP REPLACEMENT 1/9
Page 45 and 46:
Table HP2: 10 Most Common Unipolar
Page 47 and 48:
Table HP4: 10 Most Common Bipolar H
Page 49 and 50:
Table HP6: Primary Partial Hip Repl
Page 51 and 52:
Table HP14: Primary Partial Hip Rep
Page 53 and 54:
Table HP15: Primary Unipolar Monobl
Page 55 and 56:
Table HP19: Primary Bipolar Hip Rep
Page 57 and 58:
Table HP24: Primary Unipolar Monobl
Page 59 and 60:
Page 61 and 62:
Table HP32: Primary Unipolar Modula
Page 63 and 64:
Page 65 and 66:
Primary Unipolar Modular Hip Replac
Page 67 and 68:
Primary Bipolar Hip Replacement Pro
Page 69 and 70:
PRIMARY TOTAL HIP REPLACEMENT The a
Page 71 and 72:
Effect of Bearing Surface For the f
Page 73 and 74:
since 2004. The three total resurfa
Page 75 and 76:
combination has been used in 1,649
Page 77 and 78:
Table HT2: Primary Conventional Tot
Page 79 and 80:
Table HT6: 10 Most Common Femoral C
Page 81 and 82:
Table HT8: 10 Most Common Femoral C
Page 83 and 84:
Table HT10: 10 Most Common Acetabul
Page 85 and 86:
Table HT12: 10 Most Common Primary
Page 87 and 88:
Primary Conventional Total Hip Repl
Page 89 and 90:
Table HT19: Primary Conventional To
Page 91 and 92:
Page 93 and 94:
Figure HT18: Cumulative Percent Rev
Page 95 and 96:
Page 97 and 98:
Page 99 and 100:
Page 101 and 102:
Page 103 and 104:
Page 105 and 106:
Primary Total Resurfacing Hip Repla
Page 107 and 108:
Table HT39: Primary Total Resurfaci
Page 109 and 110:
Page 111 and 112:
Page 113 and 114:
Table HT48: Yearly Cumulative Perce
Page 115 and 116:
Figure HT34-43: Cumulative Percent
Page 117 and 118:
Primary Total Resurfacing Hip Repla
Page 119 and 120:
REVISION HIP REPLACEMENT This repor
Page 121 and 122:
REVISION HIP REPLACEMENT 1/9/1999 -
Page 123 and 124:
‘Revision of Known Primary’ Hip
Page 125 and 126:
Table HR10: Outcomes of ‘Revision
Page 127 and 128:
knee increased from 29.4% in 2003 t
Page 129 and 130:
Table KG2: Number of Knee Replaceme
Page 131 and 132: Table KG4: Primary Knee Replacement
Page 133 and 134: PRIMARY PARTIAL KNEE REPLACEMENT Th
Page 135 and 136: Effect of Age and Gender The risk o
Page 137 and 138: Primary Partial Resurfacing Knee Re
Page 139 and 140: Table KP6: Primary Patella/Trochlea
Page 141 and 142: Table KP12: Primary Unicompartmenta
Page 149 and 150: Primary Patella/Trochlear Knee Repl
Page 151 and 152: Figure KP11-14: Cumulative Percent
Page 153 and 154: decrease in use and now accounts fo
Page 155 and 156: as having a higher than anticipated
Page 157 and 158: Table KT2: 10 Most Common Femoral C
Page 159 and 160: Table KT4: 10 Most Common Femoral C
Page 161 and 162: Figure KT5: Trends in Prosthesis Fi
Page 163 and 164: Table KT10: Primary Total Knee Repl
Page 165 and 166: Figure KT10: Primary Total Knee Rep
Page 171 and 172: Table KT23: Yearly Cumulative Perce
Page 177 and 178: Table KT30: Primary Unicompartmenta
Page 181: Table KT33: Yearly Cumulative Perce
Page 185 and 186: REVISION KNEE REPLACEMENT This repo
Page 187 and 188: p
Page 189 and 190: Figure KR1: Trends in Usage for Rev
Page 191 and 192: ‘Revision of Known Primary’ Kne
Page 193 and 194: Table KR10: Outcome of ‘Revision
Page 195 and 196: Table KR14: Outcome of ‘Revision
Page 197 and 198: CEMENT IN HIP AND KNEE REPLACEMENT
Page 199 and 200: CEMENT IN HIP AND KNEE REPLACEMENT
Page 201 and 202: Table C3: Top 10 Cements used in Re
Page 203 and 204: Table C7: Yearly Cumulative Percent
Page 205 and 206: Table C11: Yearly Cumulative Percen
Page 207 and 208: MORTALITY FOLLOWING PRIMARY HIP AND
Page 209 and 210: Table M5: Mortality following Prima
Page 211 and 212: Appendices APPENDIX 1 Glossary of S
Page 213 and 214: APPENDIX 2 Patient Consent and Conf
Page 215 and 216: INTRODUCTION - about the Registry A
Page 217 and 218: APPENDIX 5 ICD-10-AM Codes PRIMARY
show all

Hip and Knee Arthroplasty - Surface Hippy Guide to Hip Resurfacing

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?