Hip and Knee Arthroplasty - Surface Hippy Guide to Hip Resurfacing

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Primary Total Knee Replacement Prostheses with a higher than anticipated Revision Rate Table KT32: Individual Primary Total Knee Prostheses identified as having a higher than anticipated Revision Rate Femoral/Tibial Components Total Number Observed Component Years Revisions per 100 Observed Component Years Hazard Ratio P Value HR 95% CI Re-identified and no longer used Gemini MK II/ Gemini MK II 21 94 5.31 6.482
Table KT33: Yearly Cumulative Percent revision of Individual Primary Total Knee Prostheses identified as having a higher than anticipated Revision Rate CPR 1 Yr 2 Yrs 3 Yrs 5 Yrs 7 Yrs Re-identified and no longer used Gemini MK II/ Gemini MK II 9.5 (2.5, 33.0) 14.3 (4.8, 38.0) 14.3 (4.8, 38.0) 23.8 (10.7, 48.1) Genesis II Oxinium Cless/Genesis II 10.3 (6.0, 17.5) 27.0 (19.9, 36.2) 35.1 (27.1, 44.6) 36.0 (27.9, 45.5) Genesis II Oxinium Cless /MBK 22.8 (15.4, 33.1) 48.2 (38.3, 59.1) 51.6 (41.6, 62.4) 56.2 (46.2, 66.8) Interax/Interax 0 0 5.4 (1.8, 15.7) 11.1 (5.1, 23.0) 15.5 (8.0, 28.8) Profix Oxinium Cless /MBK 8.3 (4.9, 13.9) 27.0 (20.7, 34.7) 40.2 (32.9, 48.3) 41.5 (34.2, 49.7) Profix Oxinium Cless /Profix 14.1 (7.8, 24.6) 33.8 (24.1, 46.1) 35.2 (25.4, 47.5) 36.7 (26.7, 49.0) Trac/Trac 2.2 (0.7, 6.6) 4.3 (2.0, 9.4) 5.9 (3.0, 11.4) 9.0 (5.2, 15.3) 9.0 (5.2, 15.3) Re-identified and still used Optetrak-PS/Optetrak 1.8 (1.1, 2.8) 4.0 (2.8, 5.5) 5.8 (4.3, 7.8) 6.7 (5.0, 9.0) Profix/Mobile Bearing Knee 2.2 (1.5, 3.2) 4.9 (3.8, 6.4) 6.8 (5.4, 8.5) 9.4 (7.5, 11.9) Newly Identified AMK/AMK 1.0 (0.3, 3.9) 3.0 (1.4, 6.6) 5.1 (2.8, 9.2) 6.6 (3.9, 11.1) 8.9 (5.6, 14.0) Genesis II Oxinium PS Cted/Genesis II 2.1 (1.6, 2.7) 3.4 (2.7, 4.2) 4.5 (3.5, 5.6) IB II/IB II 0 1.0 (0.3, 4.0) 3.0 (1.4, 6.7) 6.8 (4.0, 11.4) 11.6 (7.6, 17.6) Optetrak-PS/Optetrak-RBK 3.6 (1.5, 8.5) Rotaglide Plus/ Rotaglide Plus 0.7 (0.3, 1.8) 3.0 (1.9, 4.9) 4.1 (2.7, 6.2) 6.3 (4.4, 9.0) TC-Plus/TC-Plus 1.6 (0.2, 10.7) 3.3 (0.8, 12.5) 10.2 (4.3, 23.3) Note: Cumulative Percent Revision equal to zero indicates that the prosthesis combination has been followed up to this time with no revisions recorded. 165
Page 1 and 2:
Hip and Knee Arthroplasty ANNUAL RE
Page 3:
Australian Orthopaedic Association
Page 6 and 7:
PRIMARY PARTIAL KNEE REPLACEMENT...
Page 8 and 9:
PRIMARY TOTAL HIP REPLACEMENT......
Page 10 and 11:
PRIMARY TOTAL KNEE REPLACEMENT ....
Page 12 and 13:
viii
Page 14 and 15:
RIMARY TOTAL RESURFACING HIP REPLAC
Page 17 and 18:
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY This executive su
Page 19 and 20:
INTRODUCTION This is the eighth Ann
Page 21 and 22:
supply aggregate data and negotiati
Page 23 and 24:
PARTICIPATING HOSPITALS & COORDINAT
Page 25 and 26:
VICTORIA PUBLIC HOSPITALS Austin He
Page 27 and 28:
QUEENSLAND PUBLIC HOSPITALS Bundabe
Page 29 and 30:
WESTERN AUSTRALIA PUBLIC HOSPITALS
Page 31 and 32:
HIP REPLACEMENT GENERAL INTRODUCTIO
Page 33 and 34:
difference is also evident when com
Page 35 and 36:
Table HG2: Number of Hip Replacemen
Page 37 and 38:
Table HG4: Primary Hip Replacement
Page 39 and 40:
Table HG8: Primary Total Resurfacin
Page 41 and 42:
The use of monoblock prostheses in
Page 43 and 44:
PRIMARY PARTIAL HIP REPLACEMENT 1/9
Page 45 and 46:
Table HP2: 10 Most Common Unipolar
Page 47 and 48:
Table HP4: 10 Most Common Bipolar H
Page 49 and 50:
Table HP6: Primary Partial Hip Repl
Page 51 and 52:
Table HP14: Primary Partial Hip Rep
Page 53 and 54:
Table HP15: Primary Unipolar Monobl
Page 55 and 56:
Table HP19: Primary Bipolar Hip Rep
Page 57 and 58:
Table HP24: Primary Unipolar Monobl
Page 59 and 60:
Page 61 and 62:
Table HP32: Primary Unipolar Modula
Page 63 and 64:
Page 65 and 66:
Primary Unipolar Modular Hip Replac
Page 67 and 68:
Primary Bipolar Hip Replacement Pro
Page 69 and 70:
PRIMARY TOTAL HIP REPLACEMENT The a
Page 71 and 72:
Effect of Bearing Surface For the f
Page 73 and 74:
since 2004. The three total resurfa
Page 75 and 76:
combination has been used in 1,649
Page 77 and 78:
Table HT2: Primary Conventional Tot
Page 79 and 80:
Table HT6: 10 Most Common Femoral C
Page 81 and 82:
Table HT8: 10 Most Common Femoral C
Page 83 and 84:
Table HT10: 10 Most Common Acetabul
Page 85 and 86:
Table HT12: 10 Most Common Primary
Page 87 and 88:
Primary Conventional Total Hip Repl
Page 89 and 90:
Table HT19: Primary Conventional To
Page 91 and 92:
Page 93 and 94:
Figure HT18: Cumulative Percent Rev
Page 95 and 96:
Page 97 and 98:
Page 99 and 100:
Page 101 and 102:
Page 103 and 104:
Page 105 and 106:
Primary Total Resurfacing Hip Repla
Page 107 and 108:
Table HT39: Primary Total Resurfaci
Page 109 and 110:
Page 111 and 112:
Page 113 and 114:
Table HT48: Yearly Cumulative Perce
Page 115 and 116:
Figure HT34-43: Cumulative Percent
Page 117 and 118:
Primary Total Resurfacing Hip Repla
Page 119 and 120:
REVISION HIP REPLACEMENT This repor
Page 121 and 122:
REVISION HIP REPLACEMENT 1/9/1999 -
Page 123 and 124:
‘Revision of Known Primary’ Hip
Page 125 and 126:
Table HR10: Outcomes of ‘Revision
Page 127 and 128:
knee increased from 29.4% in 2003 t
Page 129 and 130: Table KG2: Number of Knee Replaceme
Page 131 and 132: Table KG4: Primary Knee Replacement
Page 133 and 134: PRIMARY PARTIAL KNEE REPLACEMENT Th
Page 135 and 136: Effect of Age and Gender The risk o
Page 137 and 138: Primary Partial Resurfacing Knee Re
Page 139 and 140: Table KP6: Primary Patella/Trochlea
Page 141 and 142: Table KP12: Primary Unicompartmenta
Page 149 and 150: Primary Patella/Trochlear Knee Repl
Page 151 and 152: Figure KP11-14: Cumulative Percent
Page 153 and 154: decrease in use and now accounts fo
Page 155 and 156: as having a higher than anticipated
Page 157 and 158: Table KT2: 10 Most Common Femoral C
Page 159 and 160: Table KT4: 10 Most Common Femoral C
Page 161 and 162: Figure KT5: Trends in Prosthesis Fi
Page 163 and 164: Table KT10: Primary Total Knee Repl
Page 165 and 166: Figure KT10: Primary Total Knee Rep
Page 171 and 172: Table KT23: Yearly Cumulative Perce
Page 177 and 178: Table KT30: Primary Unicompartmenta
Page 179: Table KT31: Yearly Cumulative Perce
Page 183 and 184: Figure KT24-KT33: Cumulative Percen
Page 185 and 186: REVISION KNEE REPLACEMENT This repo
Page 187 and 188: p
Page 189 and 190: Figure KR1: Trends in Usage for Rev
Page 191 and 192: ‘Revision of Known Primary’ Kne
Page 193 and 194: Table KR10: Outcome of ‘Revision
Page 195 and 196: Table KR14: Outcome of ‘Revision
Page 197 and 198: CEMENT IN HIP AND KNEE REPLACEMENT
Page 199 and 200: CEMENT IN HIP AND KNEE REPLACEMENT
Page 201 and 202: Table C3: Top 10 Cements used in Re
Page 203 and 204: Table C7: Yearly Cumulative Percent
Page 205 and 206: Table C11: Yearly Cumulative Percen
Page 207 and 208: MORTALITY FOLLOWING PRIMARY HIP AND
Page 209 and 210: Table M5: Mortality following Prima
Page 211 and 212: Appendices APPENDIX 1 Glossary of S
Page 213 and 214: APPENDIX 2 Patient Consent and Conf
Page 215 and 216: INTRODUCTION - about the Registry A
Page 217 and 218: APPENDIX 5 ICD-10-AM Codes PRIMARY
show all

Hip and Knee Arthroplasty - Surface Hippy Guide to Hip Resurfacing

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?