Hip and Knee Arthroplasty - Surface Hippy Guide to Hip Resurfacing

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Table HP3: 10 Most Common Femoral Stems used in Primary Unipolar Modular Hip Replacement Rank 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 1 Exeter V40 Exeter V40 Exeter V40 Exeter V40 Exeter V40 (179) (179) (317) (476) (610) 2 Alloclassic Spectron EF Spectron EF Spectron EF CPT (111) (127) (162) (199) (293) 3 CPT Alloclassic CPT CPT Spectron EF (91) (111) (133) (174) (273) 4 Spectron EF CPT Alloclassic CPCS CPCS (89) (73) (102) (169) (269) 5 Fullfix Stem Fullfix Stem CPCS Alloclassic Alloclassic (49) (68) (92) (129) (156) 6 SL-Plus SL-Plus CCA Trifit Corail (38) (64) (78) (124) (137) 7 Elite Plus CCA SL-Plus Corail SL-Plus (33) (37) (68) (82) (86) 8 CCA Taperloc Fullfix Stem SL-Plus Trifit (15) (31) (36) (61) (74) 9 Thompson Modular CPCS Corail Taper Fit Taper Fit (15) (17) (29) (60) (59) 10 C-Stem VerSys Taperloc CCA Platform (13) (15) (29) (40) (30) Top 10 Usage 95% 92.1% 89.2% 88.2% 91.7% Total Procedures 666 784 1172 1717 2168 N Prosthesis Types 21 34 33 37 37 Figure HP4: 5 Most Common Femoral Stems used in Primary Unipolar Modular Hip Replacement 30
Table HP4: 10 Most Common Bipolar Heads used in Primary Bipolar Hip Replacement Rank 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 1 UHR UHR UHR UHR UHR (747) (654) (617) (552) (434) 2 Hastings Convene Tandem Tandem Tandem (140) (194) (132) (219) (166) 3 Convene Hastings Convene Multipolar Bipolar Multipolar Bipolar (115) (138) (109) (101) (142) 4 Bipolar (Sulzer) Endo Cup (Depuy) Multipolar Bipolar Endo Cup (Depuy) Hastings (91) (114) (102) (64) (64) 5 Endo Cup (Depuy) Bipolar (Sulzer) Hastings Hastings Endo Cup (Depuy) (82) (101) (96) (58) (49) 6 Multipolar Bipolar Multipolar Bipolar Endo Cup (Depuy) Convene Bipolar (Biomet) (59) (91) (87) (41) (18) 7 Bipolar (Mathys) Bipolar (Mathys) Bipolar (Sulzer) Bipolar (Zimmer) UHL (39) (21) (80) (38) (6) 8 Bipolar (Biomet) Bipolar (Biomet) Bipolar (Mathys) Bipolar (Sulzer) Bipolar (Eska) (19) (20) (24) (32) (5) 9 Bipolar (Lima) UHL Bipolar (Biomet) Bipolar (Biomet) Bipolar (Lima) (19) (11) (16) (19) (3) 10 Self-Centering Bipolar (Lima) Bipolar (Zimmer) Bipolar (Mathys) Bipolar (Plus) (5) (10) (14) (7) (2) Top 10 Usage 99.1% 98% 98.1% 97.2% 99.7% Total Procedures 1328 1381 1302 1163 892 N Prosthesis Types 13 17 17 18 12 Figure HP5: 5 Most Common Bipolar Heads used in Primary Bipolar Hip Replacement 31
Page 1 and 2: Hip and Knee Arthroplasty ANNUAL RE
Page 3: Australian Orthopaedic Association
Page 6 and 7: PRIMARY PARTIAL KNEE REPLACEMENT...
Page 8 and 9: PRIMARY TOTAL HIP REPLACEMENT......
Page 10 and 11: PRIMARY TOTAL KNEE REPLACEMENT ....
Page 12 and 13: viii
Page 14 and 15: RIMARY TOTAL RESURFACING HIP REPLAC
Page 17 and 18: EXECUTIVE SUMMARY This executive su
Page 19 and 20: INTRODUCTION This is the eighth Ann
Page 21 and 22: supply aggregate data and negotiati
Page 23 and 24: PARTICIPATING HOSPITALS & COORDINAT
Page 25 and 26: VICTORIA PUBLIC HOSPITALS Austin He
Page 27 and 28: QUEENSLAND PUBLIC HOSPITALS Bundabe
Page 29 and 30: WESTERN AUSTRALIA PUBLIC HOSPITALS
Page 31 and 32: HIP REPLACEMENT GENERAL INTRODUCTIO
Page 33 and 34: difference is also evident when com
Page 35 and 36: Table HG2: Number of Hip Replacemen
Page 37 and 38: Table HG4: Primary Hip Replacement
Page 39 and 40: Table HG8: Primary Total Resurfacin
Page 41 and 42: The use of monoblock prostheses in
Page 43 and 44: PRIMARY PARTIAL HIP REPLACEMENT 1/9
Page 45: Table HP2: 10 Most Common Unipolar
Page 49 and 50: Table HP6: Primary Partial Hip Repl
Page 51 and 52: Table HP14: Primary Partial Hip Rep
Page 53 and 54: Table HP15: Primary Unipolar Monobl
Page 55 and 56: Table HP19: Primary Bipolar Hip Rep
Page 57 and 58: Table HP24: Primary Unipolar Monobl
Page 61 and 62: Table HP32: Primary Unipolar Modula
Page 65 and 66: Primary Unipolar Modular Hip Replac
Page 67 and 68: Primary Bipolar Hip Replacement Pro
Page 69 and 70: PRIMARY TOTAL HIP REPLACEMENT The a
Page 71 and 72: Effect of Bearing Surface For the f
Page 73 and 74: since 2004. The three total resurfa
Page 75 and 76: combination has been used in 1,649
Page 77 and 78: Table HT2: Primary Conventional Tot
Page 79 and 80: Table HT6: 10 Most Common Femoral C
Page 81 and 82: Table HT8: 10 Most Common Femoral C
Page 83 and 84: Table HT10: 10 Most Common Acetabul
Page 85 and 86: Table HT12: 10 Most Common Primary
Page 87 and 88: Primary Conventional Total Hip Repl
Page 89 and 90: Table HT19: Primary Conventional To
Page 93 and 94: Figure HT18: Cumulative Percent Rev
Page 97 and 98:
Figure HT23: Cumulative Percent Rev
Page 99 and 100:
Figure HT26: Cumulative Percent Rev
Page 101 and 102:
Table HT31: Primary Conventional To
Page 103 and 104:
Table HT33: Primary Conventional To
Page 105 and 106:
Primary Total Resurfacing Hip Repla
Page 107 and 108:
Table HT39: Primary Total Resurfaci
Page 109 and 110:
Page 111 and 112:
Page 113 and 114:
Table HT48: Yearly Cumulative Perce
Page 115 and 116:
Figure HT34-43: Cumulative Percent
Page 117 and 118:
Primary Total Resurfacing Hip Repla
Page 119 and 120:
REVISION HIP REPLACEMENT This repor
Page 121 and 122:
REVISION HIP REPLACEMENT 1/9/1999 -
Page 123 and 124:
‘Revision of Known Primary’ Hip
Page 125 and 126:
Table HR10: Outcomes of ‘Revision
Page 127 and 128:
knee increased from 29.4% in 2003 t
Page 129 and 130:
Table KG2: Number of Knee Replaceme
Page 131 and 132:
Table KG4: Primary Knee Replacement
Page 133 and 134:
PRIMARY PARTIAL KNEE REPLACEMENT Th
Page 135 and 136:
Effect of Age and Gender The risk o
Page 137 and 138:
Primary Partial Resurfacing Knee Re
Page 139 and 140:
Table KP6: Primary Patella/Trochlea
Page 141 and 142:
Table KP12: Primary Unicompartmenta
Page 143 and 144:
Page 145 and 146:
Page 147 and 148:
Page 149 and 150:
Primary Patella/Trochlear Knee Repl
Page 151 and 152:
Figure KP11-14: Cumulative Percent
Page 153 and 154:
decrease in use and now accounts fo
Page 155 and 156:
as having a higher than anticipated
Page 157 and 158:
Table KT2: 10 Most Common Femoral C
Page 159 and 160:
Table KT4: 10 Most Common Femoral C
Page 161 and 162:
Figure KT5: Trends in Prosthesis Fi
Page 163 and 164:
Table KT10: Primary Total Knee Repl
Page 165 and 166:
Figure KT10: Primary Total Knee Rep
Page 167 and 168:
Page 169 and 170:
Page 171 and 172:
Table KT23: Yearly Cumulative Perce
Page 173 and 174:
Page 175 and 176:
Page 177 and 178:
Table KT30: Primary Unicompartmenta
Page 179 and 180:
Page 181 and 182:
Page 183 and 184:
Figure KT24-KT33: Cumulative Percen
Page 185 and 186:
REVISION KNEE REPLACEMENT This repo
Page 187 and 188:
p
Page 189 and 190:
Figure KR1: Trends in Usage for Rev
Page 191 and 192:
‘Revision of Known Primary’ Kne
Page 193 and 194:
Table KR10: Outcome of ‘Revision
Page 195 and 196:
Table KR14: Outcome of ‘Revision
Page 197 and 198:
CEMENT IN HIP AND KNEE REPLACEMENT
Page 199 and 200:
CEMENT IN HIP AND KNEE REPLACEMENT
Page 201 and 202:
Table C3: Top 10 Cements used in Re
Page 203 and 204:
Table C7: Yearly Cumulative Percent
Page 205 and 206:
Table C11: Yearly Cumulative Percen
Page 207 and 208:
MORTALITY FOLLOWING PRIMARY HIP AND
Page 209 and 210:
Table M5: Mortality following Prima
Page 211 and 212:
Appendices APPENDIX 1 Glossary of S
Page 213 and 214:
APPENDIX 2 Patient Consent and Conf
Page 215 and 216:
INTRODUCTION - about the Registry A
Page 217 and 218:
APPENDIX 5 ICD-10-AM Codes PRIMARY
show all

Hip and Knee Arthroplasty - Surface Hippy Guide to Hip Resurfacing

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?