31.12.2014 Views

Layout 1 - Civil Air Patrol

Layout 1 - Civil Air Patrol

Layout 1 - Civil Air Patrol

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

07-Chapter 9 Reboot Attempt pp 13-end_<strong>Layout</strong> 1 5/4/12 12:40 Page 21<br />

MORAL REASONING<br />

“There is always a philosophy for lack of courage.”<br />

ALBERT CAMUS 61<br />

“Cowards can never be moral.”<br />

GHANDI 62<br />

OBJECTIVE:<br />

17. Defend the claim that leaders must be skilled in moral reasoning.<br />

THE LEADER AS PHILOSOPHER<br />

Are answers to ethical questions unchanging Or are they determined<br />

by the circumstances This is the age-old question of<br />

objectivism* versus relativism, just one of the difficulties you<br />

confront as a leader attempting to “be the change that you want to<br />

see in the world.”<br />

Because officers play a special role in resolving problems that have<br />

ethical dimensions, they need to develop their capabilities in moral<br />

reasoning. This includes the need for each officer to study and wrestle<br />

with competing frameworks for determining right and wrong.<br />

This study can strengthen a leader’s integrity. Its end result is that<br />

the leader rationally chooses an ethical framework and strives to<br />

apply it consistently.<br />

MORAL RELATIVISM<br />

OBJECTIVE:<br />

18. Summarize the case for moral relativism.<br />

“Valour and Cowardice”<br />

Alfred Stevens<br />

*Note: Some authors use the<br />

term “moral absolutism”<br />

where we prefer the term<br />

“moral objectivism.”<br />

A leader who is familiar with<br />

“numerous diverse opinions<br />

on a subject does not merely<br />

parrot the arguments of others,<br />

but develops his own. He<br />

becomes a capable disputant,<br />

and modifies whatever does<br />

not seem well said.” 63<br />

John of Salisbury<br />

Moral relativism denies that there are certain kinds of universal<br />

truths. In ethics, this means there are no universally valid moral<br />

principles. 64 Right and wrong depend on either the culture of a<br />

particular civilization at a particular moment in history, or simply<br />

on one’s personal judgment.<br />

Where does one find evidence to support moral relativism Simply<br />

look at history. Judgments of right and wrong have varied over time.<br />

According to this line of thinking, ethics is really a matter of<br />

cultural acceptance. Perhaps this viewpoint sounds democratic.<br />

In the 21st century United States, slavery is deemed morally<br />

repugnant because every respectable person says it so; they “vote”<br />

21

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!