31.12.2014 Views

****January 2012 Focus - Focus Magazine

****January 2012 Focus - Focus Magazine

****January 2012 Focus - Focus Magazine

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

“<br />

I DON’T UNDERSTAND THE LRT PROPOSAL. It doesn’t make sense<br />

to me... With the E&N, we could use the track that’s existing, and spend<br />

a few dollars to upgrade it. It’s mind boggling to me that that wouldn’t<br />

be the first thing we would do.” —Jim Hartshorne<br />

“Municipal operations is totally different from<br />

a provincial-scale, BC Transit way of doing<br />

things,” says Geoff Pearce, the chair of C4CR,<br />

and Langford’s former clerk-administrator.<br />

“We do what’s necessary, and if something<br />

doesn’t work, we fix it and then we go on.<br />

What we envisaged with commuter rail, starting<br />

small and growing, was quite different from<br />

what the Ministry of Transportation or BC<br />

Transit says, which is, ‘You’ve got to put in<br />

$60 million up front.’”<br />

That incremental approach has worked elsewhere.<br />

Cash-strapped and desperate for transit,<br />

several American cities have converted old<br />

freight railways over to commuter service:<br />

one example is New Jersey’s River Line, which<br />

uses diesel-powered vehicles that roll into<br />

downtown Camden like streetcars. Another<br />

example, even closer to our circumstances,<br />

comes from Texas: in 1994, Dallas’s transit<br />

authority bought 13 Budd cars from VIA (used<br />

ones cost as little as $100,000) and started<br />

running them on a bankrupt freight line for a<br />

commuter service called the Trinity Railway<br />

Express. Today, TRE carries 9,800 daily passengers<br />

on new trains, and has loaned its Budd<br />

cars to build up a new commuter line in nearby<br />

Denton County.<br />

Local commuter rail does face challenges<br />

beyond finding vehicles and money. C4CR’s<br />

$16-million scheme depended on rail coming<br />

across the Johnson Street Bridge—and so far,<br />

the City of Victoria has refused to investigate<br />

whether the new bridge could have rails embedded<br />

in its roadway (an idea pushed by this author),<br />

fearing increased costs and construction delays.<br />

“It’s going to take somebody to say, ‘Hey,<br />

this is important enough, we’ll put in $30,000<br />

to help Victoria look at that alternative. And<br />

let’s do it now rather than later,’” says Pearce,<br />

who wants to see the CRD create a regional<br />

funding formula for rail on the bridge.<br />

There’s also the question of which entity<br />

would run the commuter service. Southern<br />

Rail, which is currently contracted by the Island<br />

Corridor Foundation to operate the E&N,<br />

doesn’t have passenger insurance. Pearce says<br />

VIA would be the logical choice, if it brings<br />

back its Budd cars, and can be persuaded that<br />

connecting Langford and Victoria meets its<br />

intercity mandate. Alternatively, a whole new<br />

intermunicipal service could be created, or<br />

the rail system could be operated by the CRD<br />

or BC Transit.<br />

Unfortunately, the last two bodies currently<br />

seem entranced by LRT. The CRD board, the<br />

regional transit commission, and some local<br />

politicians have already endorsed BC Transit’s<br />

shiny $950-million plan—without much worrying<br />

about whether austerity-preaching federal and<br />

provincial governments will actually pay for it,<br />

or already-public opposition from the CRD<br />

Taxpayers’ Association and businesses afraid<br />

of losing two car lanes along Douglas Street.<br />

The LRT fantasy may also cost us opportunities<br />

that are staring us right in the face.<br />

Langford’s Westhills development has set aside<br />

$1 million for a commuter-rail station, and<br />

a park-and-ride system connecting it to buses.<br />

But there’s a time limit, and if rail doesn’t materialize<br />

by the end of 2013, Westhills will spend<br />

that money on other infrastructure.<br />

Jim Hartshorne, the prime project consultant<br />

for Westhills and president of the Westshore<br />

Developers’ Association, sat on BC Transit’s<br />

community-liasion panel for LRT. “And I can<br />

tell you: I don’t understand the LRT proposal.<br />

It doesn’t make sense to me. It is, in my opinion,<br />

doomed for failure,” Hartshorne says, even<br />

though the LRT plans include Westhills. “We<br />

will have to spend millions just to acquire<br />

rights-of-way, and design a system for a billion<br />

dollars that doesn’t appear to have a population<br />

that could support it. With the E&N,<br />

we could use the track that’s existing, and<br />

spend a few dollars to upgrade it. It’s mindboggling<br />

to me that that wouldn’t be the first<br />

thing we would do.”<br />

Ross Crockford is a director<br />

of johnsonstreetbridge.org<br />

and the author of Victoria: The<br />

Unknown City.<br />

www.focusonline.ca • January <strong>2012</strong><br />

9

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!