01.01.2015 Views

Vol 31, Part I - forums.sou.edu • Index page - Southern Oregon ...

Vol 31, Part I - forums.sou.edu • Index page - Southern Oregon ...

Vol 31, Part I - forums.sou.edu • Index page - Southern Oregon ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

ABSTRACTS – Symposia<br />

frequently involved in a key role during prevention, profiling<br />

and intervention as part of a multidisciplinary team. At a<br />

minimum, the role and responsibilities of a mental health professional<br />

by default requires advanced clinical skills, knowledge<br />

of the criminal justice system, as well as competencies<br />

for appropriately responding to cultural, ethical and forensic<br />

mental health issues emerging from Lone Wolf Terrorism<br />

cases. For example, are their forensic mental health standards<br />

for profiling practices that might be sufficient to compel<br />

police and public safety personnel to consider in their potential<br />

actions This forensic mental health science symposium<br />

presents a conceptual framework of the issues that surround<br />

forensic practices in Lone Wolf Terrorism (LWT) cases. The<br />

symposium uses forensic psychology as a platform to examine<br />

several mental health factors related to LWT. A question<br />

and answer period follows a counter-point discussion of each<br />

paper presented. This presentation offers more informative<br />

questions than answers relative to the mindset of a terrorist.<br />

It also provides profiling caveats related to conceptualizing<br />

a terrorist. For example, is there a maladaptive cognitive<br />

schema or classification format (e.g., GRIPE Model) that<br />

might allow security experts to better understand terrorists<br />

An internalized homeland security directive to “think like a<br />

terrorist” is instructive for antiterrorism efforts. What is lacking,<br />

however, is a clearer understanding of the motives behind<br />

strategic options terrorists are exercising and possible antiterrorism<br />

responses. Effective counterstrategies are difficult to<br />

craft without understanding the logic that fuels acts of terrorism.<br />

The presenter provides advice on ways a reasonable<br />

assessment may be employed as a way of organizing knowledge<br />

or disaggregating a largely new behavioral frontier.<br />

22 Forensic Psychology Cultural and Ethical Considerations<br />

in Homegrown Lone Wolf Terrorism Cases, KRIS-<br />

TEN N GREIDER*, CHRIS WEHRLE, NICK BOYD,<br />

and RONN JOHNSON (Clinical Mental Health Program,<br />

School of Leadership and Education Sciences, University of<br />

San Diego, 5998 Alcalá Park, San Diego, CA, 92110; kgreidero@gmail.com,<br />

ronnjohn@sandiego.<strong>edu</strong>).<br />

The role of forensic psychologists in international and<br />

national security related work has been a long debated ethical<br />

concern amongst the American Psychological Association<br />

(APA). Many government agencies are utilizing the expertise<br />

of forensic psychologists to aid in the interrogation, profiling,<br />

and psychological analysis of homegrown lone wolf<br />

terrorism cases. Depending upon the agency and capacity of<br />

the forensic psychologists work, one may ask the question,<br />

“Whose ethics do we follow” The APA has developed a special<br />

task force to address psychological ethics and national<br />

security concerns in the wake of 9/11. This paper discusses<br />

the ethical obligations forensic psychologists must adhere<br />

to when engaging in security related work. Vignettes as outlined<br />

in APA’s Presidential Task Force Manual are thoroughly<br />

examined through case scenario perspective. The authors also<br />

address cultural considerations when developing psychological<br />

evaluations of homegrown lone wolf terrorists.<br />

23 Identifying, Securing, Organizing and Reviewing Mental<br />

Health Data in the Norway Killer Case, RONN JOHNSON*,<br />

CHRIS WEHRLE, and , KRISTEN GREIDER (Clinical<br />

Mental Health Counseling, School of Leadership and Education<br />

Sciences, University of San Diego, 5998 Alcalá Park,<br />

San Diego, CA, 92110; ronnjohn@sandiego.<strong>edu</strong>).<br />

When a mental health professional becomes involved in<br />

what some have labeled a Lone Wolf case like the Norway<br />

Killings, there is information that must be taken into consideration.<br />

This forensic psychological data is relevant for evaluating,<br />

treating and making clinical judgments (i.e., mental state<br />

at the time of the offense MSO) regarding the accused. Before<br />

any mental health professional can determine what information<br />

is required, clearly defined roles must be established<br />

because the information needed may vary depending upon the<br />

mental health professional’s role as an expert witness, a consultant,<br />

or a therapist. Once roles are defined the mental health<br />

professional must have an understanding of legal and behavioral<br />

issues regarding the case. They must also determine the<br />

information they will need to fulfill their roles and gather that<br />

information. School, psychiatric, psychological, criminal, and<br />

employment records need to be secured in order to review relevant<br />

background information regarding the accused. Once<br />

information is gathered, mental health professionals must<br />

organize it in a relevant, informative, and defensible manner<br />

in order to serve their intended psycho-legal purpose. Mental<br />

health professionals must craft a forensic report that is relevant<br />

to the forensic questions being raised (e.g., insane or<br />

sane, competent or incompetent to stand trial). The forensic<br />

standards vary from country to country as well as state to<br />

state. Forensic work in these cases can be extremely time-consuming<br />

for mental health professionals. This paper examines<br />

the pertinent information relating to the Norway Killer case.<br />

Some attention is given to an effort to forensically analyze<br />

material developed by Anders Behring Breivik. Understanding<br />

what is needed before court proceedings begin can help<br />

mental health professionals to better manage their time and<br />

re<strong>sou</strong>rces during often lengthy and high profile trials.<br />

24 Opposing Psychological Reports on the Norway Killer<br />

Case, NICK BOYD*, LINH TRAN, and RONN JOHN-<br />

SON (Clinical Mental Health Counseling, School of Leadership<br />

and Education Sciences, University of San Diego, 5998<br />

Alcalá Park, San Diego, CA, 92110; ebessen@sandiego.<strong>edu</strong>,<br />

ronnjohn@sandiego.<strong>edu</strong>).<br />

When Anders Behring Breivik, the Norway Killer, was<br />

found in connection with mass murder that shook Europe<br />

and its Norwegian community, many questions followed as<br />

to his motives, ideology, background, and mental state. With<br />

the case currently on trial, new developments, questions, and<br />

answers continue to unfold. As we look to interpret Anders<br />

53

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!