09.11.2012 Views

Technische Universität München Credit as an Asset Class - risklab

Technische Universität München Credit as an Asset Class - risklab

Technische Universität München Credit as an Asset Class - risklab

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Contents<br />

1 Introduction 1<br />

1.1 Motivation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1<br />

1.2 Objectives <strong>an</strong>d Structure . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1<br />

2 <strong>Credit</strong> Risk Tr<strong>an</strong>sfer 4<br />

2.1 <strong>Credit</strong> Risk . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4<br />

2.1.1 Definition . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4<br />

2.1.2 <strong>Credit</strong> Risk <strong>an</strong>d Regulation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5<br />

2.2 Traditional credit related Instruments . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6<br />

2.2.1 Lo<strong>an</strong>s . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6<br />

2.2.2 Bonds . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7<br />

2.3 <strong>Credit</strong> Derivatives . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10<br />

2.3.1 Definition <strong>an</strong>d Functionality . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10<br />

2.3.2 Cl<strong>as</strong>sification according to Risk Category . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12<br />

2.3.3 Re<strong>as</strong>ons for the Utilisation of <strong>Credit</strong> Derivatives . . . . . . . . . . . 12<br />

2.3.4 Ch<strong>an</strong>ces <strong>an</strong>d Risks related to <strong>Credit</strong> Derivatives Markets . . . . . . 15<br />

2.3.5 Tr<strong>an</strong>saction Costs . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 18<br />

2.3.6 Market . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 18<br />

2.4 Securitisations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 24<br />

2.4.1 Definition <strong>an</strong>d Functionality . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 24<br />

2.4.2 Cl<strong>as</strong>sification according to the Underlying <strong>Asset</strong> . . . . . . . . . . . 26<br />

2.4.3 Re<strong>as</strong>ons for the Utilisation of Securitisations . . . . . . . . . . . . . 27<br />

2.4.4 Risks related to Securitisation Markets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 28<br />

2.4.5 Tr<strong>an</strong>saction Costs . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 30<br />

2.4.6 Market . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 30<br />

3 <strong>Credit</strong> Risk Tr<strong>an</strong>sfer Instruments 35<br />

3.1 Derivatives- or Securitisation-b<strong>as</strong>ed Instruments . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 35<br />

3.2 <strong>Credit</strong> Default Swap/<strong>Credit</strong> Default Option . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 36<br />

3.3 Total Return Swap . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 38<br />

3.4 <strong>Credit</strong> Spread Option . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 40<br />

3.5 B<strong>as</strong>ket <strong>Credit</strong> Default Swap . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 40<br />

3.6 Portfolio <strong>Credit</strong> Default Swap . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 42<br />

3.7 <strong>Credit</strong> Linked Note . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 44<br />

3.8 Collateralised Debt Obligation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 46<br />

3.8.1 Traditional CDO (True Sales Securitisation) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 46<br />

iii

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!