02.01.2015 Views

Differential Diagnosis - Pacific University

Differential Diagnosis - Pacific University

Differential Diagnosis - Pacific University

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

2012 NORTHWEST RESIDENTS CONFERENCE<br />

<strong>Pacific</strong> <strong>University</strong> College of Optometry – Jefferson 224<br />

Monday, June 4, 2012<br />

8:00 am – 6:50 pm<br />

TABLE OF CONTENTS<br />

Jason Bleazard, OD<br />

VAMC Puget Sound<br />

Judy Posner, OD<br />

VAMC Jonathan Wainwright<br />

Anna Griffith, OD<br />

<strong>Pacific</strong> <strong>University</strong> & Associated Clinics<br />

Jessica Dennis, OD<br />

Eye Care Associates of Nevada<br />

Oliver Kuhn-Wilken, OD<br />

VAMC Puget Sound<br />

Jonee Brandt, OD<br />

VAMC Puget Sound<br />

Kelvin So, OD<br />

<strong>Pacific</strong> <strong>University</strong> & Associated Clinics<br />

Alison She, OD<br />

IRIS Ophthalmology Clinic<br />

Prevention & Treatment of Pseudophakic Bullous Keratopathy Pages 2-9<br />

Herpes Stromal Keratitis PAGES 10-19<br />

TBI: Treatment and Management of Accommodative and Vergence<br />

Dysfunction<br />

PAGES 20-26<br />

A Partial Cranial Nerve Three Palsy PAGES 27-35<br />

BREAK: 10:00-10:20<br />

The Problem with Prostaglandins: An Assessment of the Risks and<br />

Contraindications<br />

PAGES 36-40<br />

Etiology & Management of Posner-Schlossman Syndrome PAGES 41-45<br />

Case Studies in Pediatric contact Lens Correction Modalities for<br />

Myopic Refractive Error & Myopia Control<br />

PAGES 46-53<br />

Endothelial Cell Changes Associated with Intraocular Lens Surgery PAGES 54-58<br />

Lunch: 12:20 – 1:00<br />

Bic Trinh, OD<br />

Eye Care Associates of Nevada<br />

Amy Pedersen, OD<br />

Portland VA Medical Center<br />

Erin Bender, OD<br />

Lebanon VA Medical Center<br />

Allison Coit, OD<br />

Spokane VA Medical Center<br />

Kendra Kallemeyn, OD<br />

Roseburg VA Medical Center<br />

Persistent Epithelial Defect in Post Corneal Graft: A Case Study PAGES 59-64<br />

One Conjunctivitis Away From Endophthalmitis: A Case Report of<br />

Blebitis<br />

PAGES 65-69<br />

A Very Lumpy Nerve: A Case of Optic Nerve Head Drusen PAGES 70-76<br />

Postoperative Endophthalmitis: A Case Report PAGES 77-80<br />

Valsalva Retinopathy PAGES 81-87<br />

BREAK: 3:30-3:50<br />

Brett Richardson, OD<br />

Spokane VA Medical Center<br />

Keely Hoban, OD & Grace Tsan, OD<br />

Portland VA Medical Center<br />

Zachary Oswald, OD<br />

VAMC Jonathan Wainwright<br />

Kevin Riedel, OD<br />

Portland VA Medical Center<br />

Benjamin Taylor, OD<br />

VA Southern Oregon Rehabilitation<br />

Center & Clinics<br />

Hypotensive Crisis: Vision loss secondary to non-ocular surgery PAGES 88-92<br />

An Assessment of the Diabetic Teleretinal Imaging Program (TRIP)<br />

at the Portland Veterans Affairs Medical Center – A Retrospective<br />

Study<br />

PAGES 93-99<br />

Radioiodine Therapy & Graves’ Ophthalmopathy PAGES 100-120<br />

Long Term Ocular Complications of Rosacea PAGES 121-130<br />

Ocular Manifestations of Carotid Occlusive Disease & Ocular<br />

Ischemic Syndrome: A Case Study<br />

PAGES 131-139<br />

This program is sponsored in part by an unrestricted educational grant<br />

from


Coursebook Page 1 of 139


5/29/2012<br />

Prevention, <strong>Diagnosis</strong>, and Management.<br />

Jason Bleazard, O.D.,<br />

American Lake Veterans’ Association, Tacoma, WA<br />

Five Layers<br />

(anterior to<br />

posterior)<br />

◦ Epithelium<br />

◦ Bowman’s<br />

Layer<br />

◦ Stroma<br />

◦ Descemet’s<br />

Membrane<br />

◦ Endothelium<br />

Endothelial cells are connected by gap<br />

junctions and macular occludens and thus<br />

make up a very slightly permeable membrane<br />

between the stroma and aqueous humor.<br />

Recall that the corneal endothelium is in fact a<br />

specialized epithelial layer. The base of the<br />

cells attach to Decemet’s, while the apices face<br />

the anterior chamber.<br />

• Water follows large molecules such as amino<br />

acids and glucose into the stroma.<br />

• The endothelial cells pump water out of the<br />

cornea via Sodium/Potassium ATP-ase pumps<br />

and aquaporins.<br />

• A compromised endothelium may lead to<br />

stroma edema<br />

• The endothelial cells of the cornea do not<br />

replicate.<br />

• It follows that adult corneas have a lower<br />

endothelial cell density than youngsters.<br />

• Damage to the endothelium further decrease<br />

endothelial cells counts.<br />

Coursebook Page 2 of 139<br />

1


5/29/2012<br />

Normal Endothelial<br />

Mosaic<br />

Corneal guttata<br />

Depositions of basement membrane in<br />

Descemet’s, cause thickening and bulging<br />

into the anterior chamber.<br />

Peripherally, these are termed Hassall-Henle<br />

bodies<br />

Centrally, the areas of thickening are called<br />

guttata<br />

Guttata represent thinning of the<br />

endotheilum as well as a thickened basement<br />

membrane.<br />

Guttata – “Spotted, speckled, or drop-like”<br />

Direct illumination of<br />

advanced Corneal<br />

guttata<br />

Elaphe<br />

Guttata<br />

A damaged endothelium has a reduced ability<br />

to pump water out of the stroma<br />

Fluid accumulates between the fibrils of the<br />

stroma, resulting in edema<br />

Stromal edema results in blurry vision and a<br />

painful eye<br />

Guttata alone do not warrant a diagnosis of<br />

Fuch’s, stromal edema must be present<br />

Endothelial cell density<br />

is critical in<br />

maintaining a properly<br />

hydrated cornea.<br />

In children, the<br />

average density is<br />

3,000-4,00/mm 2<br />

In adults, cell density<br />

ranges from 1,000-<br />

2,000/mm 2<br />

In order to maintain a<br />

functioning<br />

endothelium, 500<br />

cells/mm 2 are needed<br />

The exact mechanism of endothelial cell loss is<br />

unknown, however, there are a number of<br />

theories:<br />

◦ Histology has shown increasing amounts of apoptotic<br />

endothelial cells in Fuch’s patients. These corneas<br />

also show decreased anti-apoptosis gene expression.<br />

◦ UV light (gets blamed for everything) has been shown<br />

to induce DNA damage to endothelial cells. The longer<br />

you live, the more UV you will have been exposed to.<br />

◦ Fuch’s corneas have shown to have reduced<br />

expression of the aquaproin-1 protein. This is an<br />

integral protein in pumping fluid out of the cornea.<br />

• Mouse models have shown that decreased aquaporin-1<br />

expression results in slower recovery times in edematous<br />

corneas<br />

Coursebook Page 3 of 139<br />

2


5/29/2012<br />

Other factors that result in decreased endothelial<br />

cell numbers (occur in otherwise normal eyes):<br />

◦ Age<br />

◦ Previous ocular surgery<br />

◦ Ocular trauma or infection<br />

◦ Angle closure glaucoma<br />

◦ Pseudoexfoliation<br />

◦ Long-term contact lens wear<br />

◦ Sex- Filipino men had lower endothelial cells counts than<br />

women<br />

◦ Diabetes<br />

• 10 years or more results in decreased endothelial cell<br />

numbers and morphological changes.<br />

• Endothelial cell loss after phacoemulsification is higher in<br />

diabetics than normals<br />

While not all Fuch’s patients progress to<br />

bullous keratopathy, the risk for significant<br />

corneal damage such as that in PBK is real.<br />

Swelling of the cornea as a result of<br />

iotrogenic trauma to ocular tissues.<br />

PBK results in an extremely painful eye with<br />

significant reduction in visual function.<br />

Edema can be present in the stroma and the<br />

epithelium<br />

◦ Epithelial edema results<br />

in bullae, which are<br />

essentially corneal<br />

blisters.<br />

Subjective<br />

◦ Decreased vision<br />

◦ Pain<br />

◦ Epiphora<br />

◦ Foreign body sensation<br />

◦ Photophobia<br />

◦ Recent cataract surgery<br />

Patients with PBK can present with mild to<br />

severe findings on physical examination<br />

Corneal findings:<br />

◦ Corneal guttata<br />

◦ Folds in Descemet’s Membrane<br />

◦ Stromal edema<br />

◦ Stromal haze<br />

◦ Epithelial edema<br />

◦ Bullae- may be ruptured<br />

◦ Corneal neovascularization<br />

Coursebook Page 4 of 139<br />

3


5/29/2012<br />

Other Ocular Findings:<br />

◦ Cells/flare in anterior<br />

chamber<br />

◦ Subluxed IOL<br />

◦ Shunt tube w/ current or<br />

previous endothelial touch<br />

◦ Elevated IOP<br />

◦ Cystoid macular edema (CME)<br />

has been associated with PBK,<br />

especially in patients with an<br />

anterior chamber IOL<br />

As is the case with most conditions,<br />

treatment depends on the severity of the<br />

disease in each patient.<br />

Mild cases may respond to medical therapy,<br />

while moderate to severe cases often require<br />

surgery.<br />

Mild<br />

◦ Edema<br />

• Muro 128 (NaCl 5%) gtts QID<br />

• Muro 128 (NaCl 5%) ung QHS<br />

◦ Elevated IOP<br />

• Antiglacuoma medications<br />

• Avoid prostaglandin analogues to reduce risk of CME<br />

◦ CME<br />

• Treat as with other cases of CME<br />

Surgical procedures are dependent on the<br />

severity of the patient’s condition as well as<br />

their visual potential.<br />

Penetrating Keratoplasty Diagram<br />

If a patient is a cataract surgery candidate<br />

and has Fuch’s, measures must be taken to<br />

protect the cornea.<br />

For healthy corneas with guttata, viscoelastic<br />

should be used<br />

◦ Most surgeons use the soft-shell technique<br />

• Combines cohesive and dispersive viscoelastic<br />

◦ Viscoelastic protects the endothelium from the<br />

energy released during phacoemulsification as well<br />

as the trauma that is incurred during surgery<br />

Corneas with stromal edema take special care<br />

and consideration when cataract surgery is to<br />

be performed.<br />

If CCT is greater than 640um, a “Triple”<br />

procedure may be considered<br />

◦ Triple= Phacoemulsification+IOL implantation+cornea transplant<br />

If the patient elects for CE without a<br />

transplant, they MUST be educated that they<br />

will likely need one in the future.<br />

Coursebook Page 5 of 139<br />

4


5/29/2012<br />

For patients that qualify, the triple procedure<br />

is preferred-<br />

◦ One trip to operating room<br />

• Reduces cost<br />

• Less discomfort for patient<br />

• Low risk for future corneal decompensation<br />

◦ Cataract removed<br />

◦ Surgery is the only true definitive treatment for<br />

Fuch’s<br />

Penetrating Keratoplasty (PKP) is a full-thickness<br />

corneal transplant. Previously, it was the only<br />

surgical treatment for patients with advanced<br />

Fuch’s or PBK.<br />

PKP may be indicated in a plethora of conditions:<br />

• Fuch’s<br />

• PBK<br />

• Keratoconus<br />

• Failed grafts<br />

• Scarring<br />

• Corneal thinning<br />

• Corneal perforations<br />

While more surgeons are familiar with PKP,<br />

there are a fair amount of downsides to it…<br />

• Even in uncomplicated cases, Post-op is very<br />

involved -<br />

• Topical corticosteroids<br />

• QID*1mo<br />

• QD*6mo<br />

• Q o D *6mo<br />

• This may be altered (usually increased)<br />

• Systemic steroids or other immunosuppressants may<br />

be warranted as well<br />

• Endophthalmitis- most dreaded complication<br />

• Treated aggressively<br />

• Epithelial downgrowth<br />

• Wound Leak- requires immediate intervention<br />

• Epithelial defects (usually resolve w/ lubrication after a<br />

few weeks)<br />

• Glaucoma due to:<br />

• Infectious keratitis<br />

• Crystalline keratitis – usually 2’ streptococcus near suture<br />

• Graft rejection<br />

• 50% of rejection occurs w/in 6 mo<br />

• The rest usually occur w/in the next 6 mo<br />

• Most common type is also the most serious: Endothelial<br />

rejection<br />

• Tx= Repeat transplant<br />

• 10% are epithelial<br />

Nowadays, PKP is not always considered firstline<br />

treatment, and is more of a last-resort<br />

for PBK patients in the U.S.<br />

Newer techniques are proving to be quite<br />

effective and tend to have fewer side effects<br />

and less severe complications<br />

We will review some of the well-established<br />

procedures and introduce a few new ones as<br />

well<br />

DALK = Deep Anterior Lamellar Keratoplasty<br />

DSEK= Descemet Stripping Endothelial<br />

Keratoplasty<br />

◦ DSAEK= Descemet Stripping Automated Endothelial<br />

Keratoplasty<br />

◦ FS-DSEK= Femtosecond DSEK<br />

DMEK= Descemet Membrane Endothelial<br />

Keratoplasty<br />

◦ Transplantation of Decemet’s membrane and<br />

endothelium only<br />

PTK = Phototherapeutic Keratectomy<br />

Coursebook Page 6 of 139<br />

5


5/29/2012<br />

Began in 2003<br />

Descemet’s Membrane and endothelium is<br />

removed from the host cornea<br />

Small portion of posterior stroma along with<br />

Descemet’s and endothelium are harvested<br />

and transplanted on posterior surface of host<br />

cornea<br />

DSEK<br />

No corneal surface incisions<br />

Little post-op astigmatism<br />

Fewer suture related problems<br />

Less wound dehiscence<br />

Better, less variable visual<br />

outcomes<br />

Low rates of graft rejection<br />

Usually done after cataract surgery<br />

Higher endothelial density longterm<br />

PKP<br />

Significant corneal incisions<br />

High and variable astigmatism<br />

High rates of suture problems<br />

Wound dehiscence<br />

Variable, poor visual outcomes<br />

Higher (double) graft rejection<br />

rates<br />

Done before cataract surgery<br />

Lower cell denisty<br />

In Koenig’s study, patients went from an<br />

average of 20/100 preoperatively to 20/40<br />

postoperatively @ 6 months.<br />

DSEK and DSAEK have shown promising longterm<br />

outcomes.<br />

◦ Li’s study showed steady improvement in BCVA<br />

from 6-12 months, from 12-24 months, and from<br />

24-36 months, with a mean BCVA of 20/25.<br />

◦ Ratanasit et al. showed 75% of patients were<br />

20/20-20/40 @ 5 years, and not one patient lost<br />

vision.<br />

Successful In vitro<br />

Descemet’s Membrane<br />

transplantation in 1998,<br />

2002<br />

Descemet’s and<br />

endothelium removed<br />

from both host and<br />

donor.<br />

Both Descemet’s and<br />

endothelium are<br />

transplanted to host<br />

cornea<br />

No stroma<br />

In vivo DMEK in 2006<br />

◦ Single case- 20/20 vision<br />

one week post-op<br />

DMEK carries most of the same risks as DSEK<br />

DMEK patients are more likely to experience a<br />

graft dislocation.<br />

◦ Over 50% of patients had a dislocation<br />

◦ In DMEK, dislocations are partial<br />

◦ Partial dislocations require re-bubbling and are<br />

relatively simple to correct<br />

Price et al (60 eyes, two surgeons, both were<br />

brand new to DMEK)<br />

◦ Mean BCVA was 20/30 @ one month<br />

• 84% were 20/40 or better<br />

◦ Mean BCVA @ 3 months was 20/25<br />

• 94% were 20/40 or better<br />

• 63% were 20/25 or better<br />

Coursebook Page 7 of 139<br />

6


5/29/2012<br />

DMEK<br />

Better refractive predictability<br />

DSEK<br />

Fair predictability – Host stroma<br />

adds to corneal thickness<br />

Thinner post-op CCT (528um) Thicker post-op CCT (650um)<br />

Endothelial cell density equal ---<br />

Tearing of donor tissue<br />

Less likely to tear<br />

Can use one donor cornea for<br />

DMEK + DALK<br />

No hyaluronic acid- lower<br />

host/donor interface issues<br />

Lower start-up cost<br />

Can only use donor cornea for<br />

DSEK<br />

Need to use hyaluronic acid<br />

Higher start-up cost<br />

(microkeratom)<br />

Done by many corneal surgeons<br />

Fewer experienced surgeons<br />

Partial graft detachments common Graft detachment rare (2-3%)<br />

Using 20/40 or better @ 6-12 months<br />

post-op as a benchmark:<br />

38-100% of DSEK pts<br />

◦ Few reach 20/25<br />

40% of PKP pts<br />

95% of DMEK pts<br />

◦ 75% reached 20/25<br />

◦ Most are 20/40 on the day of surgery<br />

Post-op endothelial cell density is reduced in<br />

both DSEK and DMEK. This is due to (1) cell loss<br />

during dissection and (2) endothelial damage<br />

while the graft is being handled before and<br />

during surgery.<br />

DMEK and DSEK are comparable in cell counts<br />

◦ 25-54% loss 6 mo Post op in DSEK<br />

◦ 24-61% 1 yr post op in DSEK<br />

◦ 30% loss at 1 yr in DMEK<br />

◦ 40% 1 yr post op in PKP<br />

Even with all the cell loss, most corneas are well<br />

above the 500/mm 2 cutoff.<br />

For patients with limited visual potential<br />

unrelated to the cornea, phototherapuetic<br />

keratectomy (PTK) is a good option for pain<br />

management.<br />

Collagen cross-linking has shown some<br />

potential for pain management, but longterm<br />

results are lacking.<br />

It may be possible to inject prepared<br />

endothlial cells into the anterior chamber as<br />

they have shown the ability to migrate onto<br />

the posterior surface of the cornea.<br />

PKP is well-established, but has more serious<br />

and frequent complications and poorer visual<br />

outcomes<br />

DSEK/DSAEK provides for predictable<br />

outcomes but requires a long wait-time<br />

before visual acuity is optimal<br />

DMEK is new and looks promising, however<br />

there are few surgeons who will do it and<br />

graft dislocations are common.<br />

PBK causes painful vision loss<br />

It is largely avoidable<br />

Careful examination, proper patient<br />

education, and appropriate surgical care are<br />

necessary to avoid PBK<br />

DSEK is the most common option for<br />

treatment of PBK or use in a tirple procedure<br />

DMEK has shown very promising results and<br />

will be implemented in many surgical centers<br />

Coursebook Page 8 of 139<br />

7


5/29/2012<br />

Ehlers, Justis P., et al. The Wills Eye Manual: Office and Emergency Room <strong>Diagnosis</strong><br />

and Treatment of Eye Disease, Fifth Edition. Baltimore, Lippincott Williams &<br />

Wilkins, 2008.<br />

Ghanem, Santhiago, Berti, Thomaz, Netto “Collagen crosslinkin with riboflavin and<br />

ultraviolet-A in eyes with pseudophakic bullous keratopathy.” Journal of Cataract<br />

& Refractive<br />

Surgery. 36.2. (2010).<br />

Kanski, Jack J. Clinical Opthalmology: A Sytematic Approach, Seventh Edition.<br />

Elsevier Saunders, 2011.<br />

Koenig, Steven B., Covert, Douglas J., Dupps, William J., Meisler, Daivd M. “Visual<br />

Acuity, Refractive Error, and Endothelial Cell Density Six Months After Descemet<br />

Stripping and Automated Endothelial Keratoplasty (DSAEK).” Cornea. 26.6 (2007).<br />

Li, Jennifer Y., Terry, Mark A., Goshe, Jeffrey, Davis-Boozer, David, Shamie, Neda. “<br />

Three-Year Visual Acuity Outcomes after Descemet’s Stripping Automated<br />

Endothelial Keratoplasty.” Ophthalmology. March 2012.<br />

Lin, Pei-Yu, Wu, Chih-Chiau, Lee, Shui-Mei. “Combined phototherapeutic<br />

keratectomy and therapeutic contact lens for recurrent erosions in bullous<br />

keratopathy. British Journal of Ophthalmology. 85 (2001).<br />

Milla, Elena, Verges, Carlos, Cipres, Maricruz. “Corneal Endothelium Evaluation<br />

After Phacoemulsification With Continuous Anterior Chamber Infusion.”Cornea.<br />

24.3 (2005).<br />

Price, Marianne O., Giebel, Arthur W., Fairchild, Kelly M., Price, Francis W.<br />

“Descemet’s Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty: Prospective Multicenter Study of<br />

Visual and Refractive Outcomes and Endothelial Survival.” Ophthalmology. 116.12<br />

(2009).<br />

Ratanasit, Arlene, Gorovoy, Mark S. “Long-term Results of Decemet Stripping<br />

Automated Endothelial Keratoplasty.” Cornea. 30.12 (2011).<br />

Rosado-Adames, Noel, Afshari, Natalie A. Current Opinion in Ophthalmology. 23.1<br />

(2012).<br />

Remington, Lee Ann. Clinical Anatomy of the Visual System, Second Edition. T.<br />

Louis. Elsevier, 2005.<br />

Ruggeri, A, Grisan, E., Jaroszeski, J. “A new system for the automatic estimation of<br />

endothelial cell density in donor corneas.” British Journal of Ophthalmology. 89<br />

(2005).<br />

Seitzman, Gerami D. “Cataract Surgery in Fuch’s Dystrophy.” Current Opinion in<br />

Ophthalmology. 16 (2005).<br />

Wollensak, Aurich, Wirbelauer, Pham. “Potential Use of Riboflavin/UVA Cross-<br />

Linking in Bullous Keratopathy.” Ophthalmic Research. 41.2 (2009).<br />

Coursebook Page 9 of 139<br />

8


5/29/2012<br />

A Case Presentation<br />

Case Presentation<br />

Introduction to Stromal keratitis<br />

• Immune Stromal Keratitis (ISK) defined<br />

• Necrotizing versus Non-necrotizing<br />

Pathophysiology of the disease<br />

Epidemiology<br />

Workup<br />

Landmark Studies – HEDS I and II<br />

Current therapies<br />

• Including surgery<br />

Conclusion/Clinical Pearls<br />

65 YOWM new patient presented for a<br />

consult for a CVE<br />

The consult was placed by their PCP for<br />

vision changes thought to be related to<br />

hyperbaric O2 treatments 2/2 a bleeding<br />

bladder from radiation cystitis<br />

• Vet was initially given radiation therapy for<br />

prostate cancer<br />

• Last tx received 04/11- total of 40 tx that started<br />

in 02/11<br />

Overview: Hyperbaric oxygen therapy<br />

(HBOT) is breathing 100% oxygen while<br />

under increased atmospheric pressure<br />

HBOT is generally performed daily for a<br />

minimum of 30 treatments<br />

• Treatment is typically at 2 to 2.4 ATA for a total<br />

of 90 minutes<br />

• ATA = atmosphere absolute<br />

• 1 ATA= atmospheric pressure at sea level<br />

Delayed radiation injury (soft tissue and<br />

bony necrosis) **<br />

Diabetic retinopathy<br />

Diabetic foot<br />

Carbon monoxide poisoning<br />

Decompression sickness<br />

Selected problem wounds<br />

Coursebook Page 10 of 139<br />

1


5/29/2012<br />

Increase in myopia*<br />

Improvement in hyperopia<br />

Vision changes more common after 20<br />

treatments and in patients >40 years old<br />

This is usually temporary and in the<br />

majority of patients, vision returns to its<br />

pre-treatment level about six weeks after<br />

the cessation of therapy<br />

CC: Decreased vision at distance OU, that<br />

occurred suddenly after receiving O2 treatments<br />

LEE: ~ 08/11 with Dr. X (a non-VA provider);<br />

07/13/11 CVE at the Portland VAMC<br />

Current Ocular Medications: Prednisone TID OS<br />

prescribed initially by Dr. X for an “abrasion”<br />

and a “viral infection” that he has been using<br />

intermittently since ~08/11 (renewed by his PCP)<br />

– had been off for 1 month and was about to<br />

restart<br />

Personal OHx: corneal abrasion OS with a<br />

viral infection dx ~8/11<br />

Family OHx: Unremarkable<br />

Pertinent Medical Conditions: DM II,<br />

COPD, Vitamin D deficiency, prostate<br />

cancer<br />

Autorefractor:<br />

• RE:-1.25-0.75x091 LE:-1.75-1.00x013<br />

Current Spec Rx: Bifocals<br />

• RE:-0.50DS 20/60 PH:20/40<br />

• LE:-0.25-0.75x033 20/150 PH:20/80<br />

• ADD:+2.50<br />

Pupils: PERRL (-)APD OU<br />

EOMS:FROM OU<br />

CF:FTFC OU<br />

SLE:<br />

• L/L: BE: flakes, lower lid laxity w/ mild proptosis<br />

• Conj: BE: Ping N&T LE:1+ diffuse injection temp<br />

• Cornea:BE: arcus 360 w/ krukenberg spindles<br />

• LE: central areas of white patchy stromal haze<br />

• Sectoral deep stromal NV from ~3:00-5:00<br />

• Central folds and SEI, bullae superior cornea<br />

• (+)staining over the neo with stromal filling<br />

• A/C: Deep and Quiet OU<br />

• Iris: Normal w/o NVI OU<br />

• Tonomtery by Applanation: 15/16 @ 15:48<br />

Coursebook Page 11 of 139<br />

2


5/29/2012<br />

DFE:<br />

Periphery: Attached 360 w/o holes/tears<br />

Lens: RE: 1+ milky NS w/ vacuoles LE:1-2+<br />

milky NS<br />

Vitreous: BE: syneresis<br />

Optic Nerve C/D ratio: RE:0.35 rd HRT<br />

LE:0.40 shallow HRT<br />

Macula: Flat and Dry OU LE: hazy view 2/2<br />

cornea<br />

Vessels:1:2 with moderate tortuosity and<br />

threadlike arterioles<br />

1)Left Eye Stromal Keratitis with stromal<br />

edema – likely related to Herpes virus<br />

per patient history with Dr. X<br />

2)Bilateral Nuclear Sclerotic Cataracts<br />

3)Diabetes Type II without retinopathy<br />

OU<br />

4)Bilateral Retinal Vascular Changes –<br />

likely related to hyperbaric treatments<br />

received back in April<br />

Coursebook Page 12 of 139<br />

3


5/29/2012<br />

1)Prescribed oral Acyclovir 800mg 5X/day<br />

for 1 month<br />

• Viroptic 5x/day OS<br />

• Pred acetate 1% q2h OS<br />

• A referral to Portland VAMC for a corneal consult<br />

• Vet from Astoria, OR and would not be able to f/u in<br />

Walla Walla<br />

2-4)Baseline photos were taken, will<br />

monitor.<br />

HPI: Vet reports symptoms started a year ago, with blurry<br />

vision, pain and redness in the left eye<br />

He was treated for an eye infection with numerous gtts (he<br />

thinks herpes)<br />

He denies any rash or eyelid lesions at the time<br />

He had a recurrence after 3 months. He was seen in Walla<br />

Walla, and was treated for HSV keratitis<br />

His symptoms resolved after 2 weeks of treatment<br />

Today he is pain free, but noted continued blurry vision in<br />

both eyes. He was referred for evaluation by corneal<br />

specialist to r/o interstitial keratitis OS<br />

Habitual Rx Acuity:<br />

• RE:20/100+1 PH:20/40-2 LE:20/400 PH:20/80<br />

Pupils: Dilated OU<br />

EOMS: FROM OU<br />

Cover Test: No tropia<br />

CF: FTFC OU<br />

Ocular Medications: PF OS 5x per day,<br />

Ocuflox TID OS, viroptic 5x/day OS,<br />

acyclovir 800mg po 5x/day<br />

SLE:<br />

• L/L: No lesions OU<br />

• Cornea: RE: WNL, +KS<br />

• LE: trc PEE, IT pannus 1mm beyond limbus<br />

• 1+ subepi haze<br />

• 1+ diffuse stromal haze most prominent IT extending centrally<br />

• Deep stromal NV IT<br />

• Conj: 1+ diffuse injection<br />

• AC: Deep and quiet<br />

• Iris: WNL (-)NVI<br />

• Tonometry: 14/14 @<br />

DFE: Same as previous exam<br />

OCT Scan: RE:261, no IRF/SRF LE:267, no IRF/SRF<br />

1)Corneal Opacity, OS<br />

• With extension to visual axis, and poor visual acuity (20/80)<br />

• Possible interstitial keratitis, in the setting of presumed HSV keratitis, and<br />

history of atopy (exzema)<br />

• PPD negative<br />

• Reports history of risk factors for syphillis<br />

• Check RPR, ANA, RF, Lyme, EBV, ESR<br />

• Continue PF, viroptic, ofloxacin, acyclovir<br />

• F/U with cornea fellow next week<br />

2)DM II, no retinopathy OU<br />

• No CSME<br />

• Continue good glycemic index<br />

• Continue annual exams<br />

3)Pigment Dispersion Syndrome, OU<br />

• Stable IOP, nerves intact<br />

4)Cataract OU<br />

• Monitor.<br />

Habitual RX Acuity:<br />

RE:20/60-2 PH:20/30-2, LE:20/80-2 PH:20/40-2<br />

Pupils: 2/3 (-)APD<br />

SLE:<br />

• L/L: No lesions OU<br />

• Cornea:<br />

• RE: Epi intact, trc subepi haze, +KS<br />

• LE: Decreased corneal sensation, +KS<br />

• Conj: White and Quiet OU<br />

• A/C: deep and quiet OU<br />

• Iris: TIDs peripherally OU<br />

• Tonometry: 15/14 @ <br />

Coursebook Page 13 of 139<br />

4


5/29/2012<br />

1)presumed HSV stromal keratitis OS.<br />

Clincal appearance consistent. RPR, ANA,<br />

RF, EBV, ESR, wnl.<br />

• h/o atopy<br />

• Continue PF qid<br />

• Reduce acyclovir to 400mg po bid<br />

• d/c viroptic<br />

• d/c ocuflox<br />

• Return 4 wks, MRx next visit<br />

Herpes Simplex Type I and Type II<br />

Cytomegalovirus<br />

Epstein-Barr Virus<br />

VZV<br />

Ocular herpes affects each corneal layer differently<br />

and can vary in presentation as categorized below:<br />

• Corneal epithelial disease<br />

• Dendritic keratitis<br />

• Geographic (ameboid) ulcer<br />

• Marginal keratitis (limbitis)<br />

• Corneal Stromal Disease**<br />

• Necrotizing<br />

• Non-Necrotizing<br />

• Disciform, immune rings, limbal vasculitis<br />

• Endothelitis<br />

• Neurotrophic keratopathy 4,5<br />

Management depends on the layer affected<br />

By definition - “Immune” refers to the fact that<br />

typically at this corneal level, the virus has been<br />

reactivated and the patient has developed an<br />

immunity/humoral response<br />

The immune reaction represents a delayed<br />

hypersensitivity reaction by T lymphocytes to<br />

viral antigen<br />

There are two types of ISK that may occur during<br />

herpes infection:<br />

• Necrotizing and Non-necrotizing<br />

Presenting signs and symptoms:<br />

• Reduced vision<br />

• Pain<br />

• Photophobia<br />

• Lacrimation<br />

• Blepharospasm<br />

• Decreased corneal sensation<br />

Presentation may be either unilateral or<br />

bilateral<br />

A history of prior episodes in patients with<br />

recurrent disease may exist<br />

There may be single or multiple patches of infiltration and inflammation<br />

within the corneal stroma<br />

<br />

Typically concurrent stromal edema<br />

Stromal neovascularization may be present but is not necessary for the<br />

diagnosis<br />

<br />

The overlying epithelium is usually intact<br />

If there is epithelial disruption, it will be much smaller in area than the<br />

underlying inflammation<br />

The inflammatory deposits are thought to represent complexes of viral<br />

antigen with antibodies and complement – may take the form of a ring<br />

infiltrate (Wessely ring)<br />

<br />

<br />

Secondary anterior uveitis may be present<br />

Endothelial folds and keratic precipitates are common<br />

Coursebook Page 14 of 139<br />

5


5/29/2012<br />

Corneal thinning - secondary to chronic<br />

inflammation<br />

Corneal Scarring – secondary to stromal<br />

neovascularization that can result in<br />

profound vision loss**<br />

Fibrosis, pannus, and lipid deposits from<br />

stromal neovascularization<br />

Occurs in 20-60% of eyes with recurrent HSV, and<br />

90% of recurrent stromal keratitis 3,4<br />

It does not usually move toward ulceration and<br />

perforation<br />

Untreated non-necrotizing ISK runs a self-limiting<br />

course over several months; however if left<br />

untreated severe vascularization and scarring<br />

can result in profound vision loss thus treatment<br />

is indicated 7<br />

More severe form of herpetic stromal keratitis<br />

• Manifests as dense, cheesy, yellow-white stromal infiltration<br />

• Epithelial ulceration<br />

• Stromal edema<br />

• Dense vascularization<br />

• Profound corneal thinning<br />

• Possible perforation (major complication)**<br />

The use of topical corticosteroids without antiviral<br />

coverage may be a possible risk factor for its<br />

development<br />

It is much less common than the non-necrotizing type<br />

Coursebook Page 15 of 139<br />

6


5/29/2012<br />

Occurs mainly by 2 mechanisms:<br />

1) Reactivation of the virus in the trigeminal<br />

ganglion<br />

• Migrates down the nerve axon to replicate and<br />

infect ocular tissue<br />

2) The cornea itself<br />

• The virus may subsist latently within corneal tissue<br />

(stromal keratocytes) and reactivate<br />

• May also cause donor-derived HSV disease in<br />

transplanted corneas<br />

Conditions causing ISK include:<br />

• Herpes simplex and zoster<br />

• Epstein-Barr virus<br />

• Syphillis<br />

• Tuberculosis<br />

• Lyme disease<br />

• Mumps and measles<br />

• Acanthamoebe<br />

• Sarcoidosis<br />

• Onchocerciasis<br />

• Idiopathic<br />

The most common cause of active ISK is the herpes<br />

simplex virus, accounting for 70% of unilateral<br />

cases 2<br />

Frequency<br />

• United States<br />

• 80-90% of the US population has been infected with the<br />

herpes virus – many with no history of clinical herpes<br />

• ~ 20,000 new cases of ocular HSV occur annually<br />

• >28,000 reactivations occur annually<br />

• ~24% - 36% of patients with ocular disease will<br />

experience recurrence within 2-5 years after the first<br />

episode***<br />

• International<br />

• An estimated 1/3 of the population worldwide suffers<br />

from recurrent infections 7<br />

Mortality/Morbidity<br />

• HSV keratitis IS THE MOST FREQUENT cause of corneal<br />

blindness in the United States<br />

• A leading indication for corneal transplantation<br />

• Most common cause of infectious blindness in the<br />

Western world<br />

Age<br />

• Affects mainly adults, and occurs many years after the<br />

primary infection<br />

• In children it involves the corneal epithelium<br />

• Risk of binocular disease<br />

• A high recurrence rate<br />

• Amblyopia<br />

Corneal Abrasion<br />

Recurrent Corneal Erosion<br />

Herpes Zoster<br />

Bacterial Keratitis<br />

Fungal Keratitis<br />

Interstitial Keratitis<br />

Keratoconjunctivitis Sicca<br />

Corneal Ulcer<br />

Coursebook Page 16 of 139<br />

7


5/29/2012<br />

<strong>Diagnosis</strong> is primarily made based<br />

on clinical features of the corneal<br />

lesion **<br />

Epithelial scrapings with Giemsa<br />

stain:<br />

• Show multinucleated giant cells<br />

• Which are coalesced infected<br />

corneal epithelial cells and<br />

intranuclear viral inclusions 7<br />

viral DNA can be detected in the:<br />

• Corneal epithelium<br />

• Conjunctiva<br />

• Skin<br />

• Anterior chamber tap<br />

Negative cytology results do not<br />

exclude HSV infection<br />

Classic case of a multinucleated herpes simplex virus-infected cell 17<br />

Enzyme-linked virus inducible system<br />

(ELVIS)<br />

• Very specific for detecting herpes virus<br />

• Results in 24hrs!<br />

ELVIS test result is negative<br />

• Cell culture for confirmation is recommended<br />

Cultures obtained within several days of onset, prior to<br />

antiviral therapy give a sensitivity of up to 70%<br />

Enzyme immunoassay (EIA) tests can be<br />

performed in the office<br />

• HerpChek<br />

The Captia test (Trinity Biotech) is a<br />

blood test to detect antibodies to the HSV<br />

• Unlike other tests it can differentiate between<br />

HSV -1 and HSV-2<br />

Combined CORTICOSTEROID and antiviral therapy –<br />

• Viroptic or Zirgan and Pred acetate 1%<br />

• Acyclovir 3% ophthalmic ointment is available in Europe but not in the US<br />

• Cycloplegia and topical lubricants are used to ease patient discomfort<br />

Dosing<br />

• Viroptic (trifluridine 1%) dosing – q2h up to a maximum 9x/day for 7-14 days, then QID for<br />

1-2 days after complete epitheliazation (not to exceed 21 days due to toxicity)<br />

<br />

• Zirgan (ganciclovir 0.15%)- q3h up to 5x/day typically 7-10 days–then taper to 1-3x/day<br />

for 7 days<br />

• Pred acetate 1% q1-2h initially then tapered<br />

One common recommendation is:<br />

• Equal frequency of topical antiviral with a corticosteroid<br />

Conducted by the National Eye Institute<br />

Herpetic Eye Disease Study (HEDS) I – 1996<br />

• Focused on stromal keratitis treatment<br />

• Anti-viral alone<br />

• Anti-viral + corticosteroid<br />

• Anti-viral + corticosteroid + acyclovir<br />

Herpetic Eye Disease Study (HEDS) II- 1998<br />

• Focused on epithelial disease<br />

• Looked at early treatment with acyclovir if it prevented progression to stromal<br />

disease<br />

• Patients with previous HSV disease not active within 30 days, if longterm<br />

low dose treatment with acyclovir prevented recurrence<br />

Focused on stromal keratitis (3 groups)<br />

• Anti-viral alone<br />

• Anti-viral + corticosteroid<br />

• Anti-viral + corticosteroid + acyclovir<br />

Results<br />

1. Duration of inflammation and risk of progression were<br />

significantly reduced in patient’s receiving prednisolone<br />

2. The rate of epithelial HSV recurrence was not increased<br />

3. The addition of oral acyclovir to topical corticosteroid and<br />

topical antivirals provided no additional benefit**<br />

• The role of external factors in triggering recurrence<br />

Coursebook Page 17 of 139<br />

8


5/29/2012<br />

<br />

3 Main Studies:<br />

1. Acute Epithelial HSV Keratitis<br />

Study:<br />

• Early tx with oral acyclovir<br />

prevented progression to stromal<br />

disease<br />

2. Acyclovir Prevention Trial:<br />

• If long-term tx with low dose oral<br />

acyclovir (400mg BIDx1yr)<br />

prevented recurrence<br />

3. Ocular HSV Recurrence Factor<br />

Study – looked at triggers<br />

• Patients filled out questionnaires<br />

every week for 52 weeks to track<br />

acute and chronic stressors<br />

<br />

Results:<br />

1. There was no benefit from<br />

addition of oral acyclovir to<br />

preventing progression to<br />

stromal keratitis<br />

2. 41% reduction that any ocular<br />

herpetic disease would recur<br />

• 50% reduction in stromal keratitis<br />

3. There are no results available<br />

yet<br />

Topical cyclosporin A 0.05% showed some<br />

effectiveness in cases of HSK resistant to<br />

corticosteroids<br />

• It improves visual acuity<br />

• Reduces inflammation and lesion size<br />

• Regression of corneal stromal neovascularization 12<br />

• Contraindicated with active epithelial herpes keratitis<br />

Antiangiogenic agents, such as Avastin<br />

A therapeutic vaccine designed to boost<br />

protective CD8 T-cell population within HSV<br />

latently affected ganglia<br />

A triple-drug therapy targeting viral<br />

replication with:<br />

• Oral acyclovir<br />

• Topical cyclosporin A<br />

• Anti-VEGF<br />

Randomized clinical trials needed<br />

Penetrating Keratoplasty (PK)*<br />

Deep Anterior Lamellar Keratoplasty<br />

(DALK)<br />

• Assumes healthy endothelium intact<br />

• Not preferred secondary to viral latency in stromal<br />

keratocytes<br />

Conjunctival flap<br />

• Still performed on select patients, not as common<br />

• Helps quiet down an inflamed eye<br />

• PK may still be performed through the flap<br />

During active HSV infection AVOID<br />

transplantation<br />

• Unless perforation is eminent<br />

Corneal neovascularization is the main<br />

risk factor for immune rejection<br />

• Recent studies show that topical and<br />

subconjunctival bevacizumab (Avastin) is<br />

effective in regressing neovascularization in<br />

these patients 12<br />

Prophylaxis with oral acyclovir<br />

• Improves corneal graft survival<br />

• Famciclovir and valacyclovir may be as effective<br />

but have not been studied<br />

Topical treatment with Zirgan given it’s<br />

safety profile<br />

Coursebook Page 18 of 139<br />

9


5/29/2012<br />

Non-Necrotizing ISK<br />

• Treat with topical anti-viral (Viroptic or Zirgan) and Pred<br />

Acetate 1% with equal frequency until the steroid is<br />

tapered down to BID or QD<br />

• Add oral acyclovir AFTER the virus is inactive without<br />

treatment for 30 days – 400mg BID x 1 year<br />

Necrotizing ISK<br />

• Perforation likely eminent requiring a corneal transplant<br />

• Use oral acyclovir to prevent graft rejection<br />

• Zirgan should also be considered to prevent rejection<br />

• Restasis and Avastin are new treatments to consider as<br />

well<br />

1. Latham , Emi. "Hyperbaric Oxygen Therapy." Medscape Reference.<br />

WebMD LLC, 19052010. Web. 27 Apr 2012.<br />

.<br />

2. Onofrey B, Skorin L, Holdeman N. Ocular Therapeutics Handbook: A<br />

Clinical Manual. 3. Philadelphia; Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, 2011.<br />

198-204. Print.<br />

3. Sugar, Alan. "Herpes Simplex Keratitis." UpToDate. N.p., 11/11/2011.<br />

Web. 30 Apr 2012. .<br />

4. Schwartz GS, Harrison AR, Holland EJ. “Etiology of immune stromal<br />

(interstitial) keratitis.” Cornea. 1998; 17(3):278-81<br />

5. Krachmer J, Mannis M, Holland E. Cornea. 2. 1. Philadelphia: Elsevier<br />

Mosby, 2005. 1048-1066. Print.<br />

6. Dr. Hetrick’s book<br />

7. Sowka J, Gurwood A, Kabat A. “Immune Stromal (Interstital) Keratitis.”<br />

Handbook of Ocular Disease Management. N.p.; n.d. Web. 4 March 2012.<br />

.<br />

8. Wang, J. “Ophthalmologic Manifestations of Herpes Simplex Keratitis.”<br />

Medscape Reference. WebMD LLC., 18 Nov 2010. Web. 3 March 2012.<br />

.<br />

9. Wilhelmus KR, Gee L, Hauck WW, et al. “Herpetic Eye Disease Study. A controlled trial<br />

of topical corticosteroids for herpes simplex stromal keratitis.” Ophthalmology.<br />

1994;101(12):1883-95.<br />

10. Barron BA, Gee L, Hauck WW, et al. “Herpetic Eye Disease Study. A controlled trial of<br />

oral acyclovir for herpes simplex stromal keratitis.” Ophthalmology.<br />

1994;101(12):1871-82.<br />

11. Herpetic Eye Disease Study Group. “Predictors of recurrent herpes simplex virus<br />

keratitis.” Cornea. 2001;20(2):123-8.<br />

12. Herpetic Eye Disease Study Group. “Oral acyclovir for herpes simplex virus eye<br />

disease: effect on prevention of epithelial keratitis and stromal keratitis.” Arch<br />

Ophthalmol. 2000;118(8):1030-6.<br />

13. Herpetic Eye Disease Study Group. “Acyclovir for the prevention of recurrent herpes<br />

simplex virus eye disease.” N Engl J Med. 1998;339(5):300-6.<br />

14. Knickelbein J, Buela K, Hendricks R. “Herpes Stromal Keratitis: Erosion of Ocular<br />

Immune Privilege by Herpes Simplex Virus.” Future Virology, 5.6 (2010):699-708. Print.<br />

15. Saxena S, Sinha N. Keratoplasties- Surgical techniques and complications.<br />

Shanghai:InTech, 2012. 127-134. Print.<br />

16. Wilhelmus KR, Dawson CR, Barron BA, et al. “Risk factors for herpes simplex virus<br />

epithelial keratitis recurring during treatment of stromal keratitis or iridocyclitis.” Br J<br />

Ophthalmol 1996; 80:969-72.<br />

1-3) Latham , Emi. "Hyperbaric Oxygen Therapy." Medscape<br />

Reference. WebMD LLC, 19052010. Web. 27 Apr 2012.<br />

.<br />

4-8) Photos obtained from Wainwright Memorial VAMC Walla Walla,<br />

WA 03/24/12<br />

9-12)Photos obtained from various cartoon monster websites<br />

13,14)Photos obtained from <strong>Pacific</strong> Cataract and Laser Institute<br />

Kennewick, WA 03/14/12<br />

15)Herpes Simplex Stromal Necrotizing Keratitis- American<br />

Academy of Ophthalmology<br />

16)Trigeminal Nerve- wikipedia<br />

17)Multinucleated giant cells-<br />

<br />

18)Elvis photo- <br />

19) Conjunctival Flap photo-<br />

<br />

Coursebook Page 19 of 139<br />

10


5/31/2012<br />

Anna Griffith, O.D.<br />

<strong>Pacific</strong> <strong>University</strong> College of Optometry<br />

Resident in Vision Therapy, Rehabilitation and Pediatrics<br />

TBI Case<br />

• 33 y.o.<br />

• Involved in 9 blasts during combat<br />

• CC: Intermittent blur<br />

• HPI<br />

▫ OD>OS<br />

▫ All distances<br />

▫ Lasts 2 seconds - 1 minute<br />

▫ Eyestrain on the computer after 2-3 hours<br />

▫ Cannot see 3-D in movies, also cause nausea<br />

• Goals<br />

▫ Read again<br />

▫ Return to School for Electrical Engineering<br />

TBI Case<br />

• Other complaints<br />

▫ Difficulty finding things<br />

in crowded drawers or<br />

shelves<br />

▫ Extreme photosensitivity,<br />

some days much worse<br />

than others<br />

TBI Case: Medical History<br />

• Brain Contusion and<br />

Blood Clots seen on MRI<br />

• PTSD<br />

• HTN<br />

• GERD<br />

• Quitting Smoking<br />

0.5 pack/day x 10 years<br />

• Care giver<br />

• Acetaminophen prn<br />

• Diazepam<br />

• Docusate<br />

• Hydrocodone<br />

10/Acetaminophen<br />

• Mirtazapine<br />

• Nicotine Patch and Resin<br />

Complex<br />

• Omeprazole<br />

• Promethazine<br />

• Sumatriptan<br />

• Verapamil<br />

TBI Case: Exam Findings<br />

• OD: -2.50-0.75 x 030 OS: -2.50 DS<br />

• Distance Visual Acuity<br />

▫ OD: 20/20-1<br />

▫ OS: 20/20-1<br />

• Near Visual Acuity<br />

▫ OD: 20/25<br />

▫ OS: 20/20<br />

• EOMs: Full, unrestricted VF: FTFC<br />

• Pupils: PERRL-APD<br />

• Saccades: Quick and Accurate<br />

• Pursuits: Smooth and Accurate<br />

TBI Case: Exam Findings<br />

• Distance Cover Test: Ortho<br />

• Near Cover Test: 2 Exophoria<br />

• In-Phoropter Vertical Phoria: 1 BU OS<br />

• Red lens test: Fusion<br />

• Vertical Maddox Rod: (-) Vertical deviation<br />

• Fixation Disparity:<br />

▫ Horizontal: Type IV curve<br />

▫ Vertical Associated Phoria: 1^BU OS<br />

• Stereo: 30” Stereo with 1^BU OS: 20”<br />

Coursebook Page 20 of 139<br />

1


5/31/2012<br />

TBI Case: Accommodative Findings<br />

• Amplitude:<br />

▫ OD: 5.25/4.75D<br />

▫ OS: 5.00/4.75D<br />

• Accuracy: MEM (+0.50)<br />

• Facility: +/-2.00 flippers<br />

▫ 2.00D too difficult<br />

▫ 1.50D OD: 4.5cpm<br />

▫ 1.50D OS: 11cpm<br />

▫ 1.50D OU: Suppression<br />

• Binocular Cross-Cyl: +0.75 (varied +0.25 to+1.00)<br />

• NRA, PRA<br />

▫ +3.50/+2.75, -1.50/-1.25<br />

Accommodation/Vergence Relationship<br />

• Low PRA<br />

▫ Decreased accommodative amplitude and/or<br />

decreased negative fusional vergence (BI)<br />

• Low NRA<br />

▫ Reduced ability to relax accommodation and/or<br />

decreased positive fusional vergence (BO)<br />

TBI Case: Vergence Findings<br />

• Gross Convergence<br />

▫ 18 inches<br />

• Near Vergence Ranges<br />

▫ Phoropter: smooth, in-instrument<br />

• BO: 34/34/18<br />

• BI: 24/28/15<br />

▫ Prism bar: jump vergence, free-space<br />

• BO: 20/14<br />

• BI: 10/8<br />

TBI Case: Other Testing<br />

• Visual Midline Shift:<br />

Negative<br />

• DEM (Developmental Eye<br />

Movement test) Tests for<br />

Saccadic Dysfunction:<br />

H/V ratio: 7 th percentile<br />

TBI Case: Other Testing<br />

• Motor-Free Visual Perceptual Test, Edition 3<br />

(MVPT-3): Age equivalent: 18 years. Most<br />

difficulty with figure ground and form constancy<br />

TBI Case: Assessment and<br />

Recommendations<br />

• Assessment<br />

▫ Accommodative Insufficiency and Infacility<br />

▫ Gross Convergence Insufficiency (possibly<br />

secondary to accommodative dysfunction)<br />

▫ Decreased Visual Perceptual Skills<br />

• Recommendations<br />

▫ Vision therapy to improve visual efficiency and<br />

reduce symptoms<br />

▫ Re-evaluate vertical deviation<br />

Coursebook Page 21 of 139<br />

2


5/31/2012<br />

Accommodative Therapy:<br />

Near-Far Hart Chart<br />

• Monocular<br />

• Push up with near chart<br />

• Many variations<br />

• Can also be used for<br />

saccadic training<br />

• Goal: Accuracy, then<br />

speed<br />

Accommodative Therapy:<br />

Loose Lens Rock<br />

• Monocular<br />

• Target: sheet of words<br />

or groups of letters<br />

• Alternate viewing<br />

between (-) and (+)<br />

lens<br />

• Goal: -6.00/+2.50<br />

Accommodative Therapy:<br />

HTS (Home Therapy System)<br />

• Red/Blue Glasses<br />

create monocular<br />

fixation in a<br />

binocular field<br />

(MFBF)<br />

Accommodative Therapy:<br />

Binocular Accommodative Rock<br />

• Binocular: Bar readers<br />

and red/green or<br />

polaroid glasses for<br />

monitoring<br />

suppression<br />

• Use lens flipper<br />

Accommodative Therapy:<br />

Prolonged Reading<br />

• Monocular or Binocular<br />

• Bar readers<br />

• 2 minute adaptation<br />

period<br />

Convergence Therapy:<br />

Gross Convergence<br />

• Brock String<br />

▫ Push up<br />

▫ Bug on a String<br />

▫ Bead Jumps<br />

▫ Different FOG<br />

• Barrel Card<br />

http://www.flickr.com/photos/xooorx/6264870613/<br />

http://www.bernell.com/category/skeyword=barrel+card<br />

Coursebook Page 22 of 139<br />

3


5/31/2012<br />

Convergence Therapy:<br />

Smooth Vergence<br />

• Variable Vectogram<br />

• Variable Tranaglyph<br />

Convergence Therapy: Smooth<br />

Vergence<br />

• Computer Programs<br />

(HTS, VTS, Vision<br />

Builder)<br />

• Tromboning with<br />

Stereoscope<br />

http://www.visiontherapysolutions.net/co.php#7<br />

http://www.bernell.com<br />

Convergence Therapy:<br />

Jump Vergence<br />

• Fixed Tranaglyphs<br />

• Fixed Tranaglyphs<br />

• HTS, VTS, or Vision<br />

Builder<br />

Convergence Therapy:<br />

Jump Vergence<br />

• Loose Prism Rock<br />

• Look-aways with any<br />

vergence activity<br />

http://www.bernell.com<br />

• Computer Program<br />

Jump Vergence (HTS,<br />

VTS, Vision Builder<br />

http://www.bernell.com<br />

http://www.bernell.com<br />

Convergence Therapy:<br />

Free Space<br />

Eccentric Circles<br />

• Can be done in<br />

different fields of<br />

gaze and with<br />

motion<br />

Life Savers<br />

Accommodation Progress Chart<br />

Accomm.<br />

Amplitude<br />

(break /<br />

recovery)<br />

2/2/12 5.25/4.75D<br />

5.00/4.75D<br />

2/9/23 6.00/4.75 D<br />

7.75/6.00 D<br />

Facility +/-<br />

2.00<br />

(OD/OS)<br />

7cpm/7cpm<br />

Facility<br />

+/-2.00<br />

(OU)<br />

suppression<br />

both sides<br />

Near Far<br />

Rock Hart<br />

Chart<br />

OD/OS<br />

3:28/not<br />

timed<br />

2/23/12 18cpm/18cpm 2:31/2:35<br />

3/1/12 +/-0.75<br />

flippers:<br />

intermittent<br />

suppression<br />

3/15/12 6.5, 8cpm<br />

5/17/12 18cpm/19cpm 9cpm 2:15/2:12<br />

Coursebook Page 23 of 139<br />

4


5/31/2012<br />

Vergence Progress Chart<br />

Developmental Eye Movements Test<br />

Clown Vecto<br />

2/2 BO: 4/2<br />

BI: 2/0<br />

Spirangle<br />

Vecto<br />

2/9 BO: 10/4<br />

BI: 10/9<br />

3/1 BO: 21/13<br />

BI: 13/8<br />

5/17 BO: 20/17<br />

BI: 14/7<br />

BO: 35/24<br />

BI: 21/14<br />

Quoit Vecto<br />

BO: 2/0<br />

BI: 2/0<br />

BO: 2/0<br />

BI: 2/0<br />

BO: 25/23<br />

BI: 13/8<br />

BO: 29/23<br />

BI: 11/7<br />

Brock<br />

String<br />

6 inches<br />

w/effort<br />

7cm<br />

Stereoscope<br />

BO: 7<br />

BI: 3<br />

Vergence<br />

Facility<br />

8pd: 3cpm<br />

6pd: 6cpm<br />

8pd:<br />

8.5cpm<br />

• February 9 th<br />

▫ Vertical: 77 th percentile<br />

▫ Horizontal: 53 rd percentile<br />

▫ H/V: 7 th percentile<br />

▫ 1-2 errors<br />

• March 15 th<br />

▫ Vertical: 72 nd percentile<br />

▫ Horizontal: 69 th percentile<br />

▫ H/V: 47 th percentile<br />

▫ No errors<br />

Stereo Acuity<br />

• Initial Evaluation: 70”<br />

• After 2 wks of therapy: 30”<br />

Treatment Summary<br />

Initial Evaluation<br />

OD Monocular Facility +/-1.50: 4.5 cpm<br />

OS Monocular Facility +/-1.50: 11 cpm<br />

Post Therapy<br />

Evaluation<br />

+/-2.00: 18 cpm<br />

+/-2.00: 19cpm<br />

Binocular Facility +/-0.75: unable +/-2.00: 9 cpm<br />

• 3 months later: 20”<br />

Near BI range 24/28/15 x/12/5<br />

Near BO range 34/34/18 >40/30<br />

Vergence Facility unable 8BI/BO: 8.5 cpm<br />

NPC 18 inches 6 cm<br />

Stereopsis 70” 20”<br />

DEM H/V ratio 7 th percentile 47 th percentile<br />

Subjective Improvements<br />

Reading again<br />

More visually aware/less blur<br />

Feels more ready to start<br />

school for Electrical<br />

Engineering<br />

Sees 3-D in movies<br />

Treatment Summary<br />

• Evaluations and initial treatment: Dec, Jan. 26<br />

• 5 training sessions: Feb. 2 nd , 9 th , 23 rd , March 1 st<br />

and 15 th<br />

• Progress Visual Efficiency Eval: April 12 th (not<br />

feeling well and very dim illumination needed)<br />

• Progress: MVPT3, DEM, FD: April 19 th<br />

• CL fit: May 3 rd<br />

• CL check and repeat Visual Efficiency Progress<br />

Evaluation: May 17 th<br />

Coursebook Page 24 of 139<br />

5


5/31/2012<br />

Special Considerations for VT patient<br />

with TBI<br />

• Usually takes longer<br />

• Other factors, speech, cognitive impairment, etc.<br />

• Mild TBI often most successful cases<br />

• More variation in performance, good and bad<br />

days<br />

• Be aware of nausea<br />

• Vision Therapy can make a difference<br />

Traumatic Brain Injury<br />

• 1.4 million brain injuries each year 1<br />

• 5.3 million Americans (2% of population) need<br />

help performing activities of daily living 2<br />

• In combat, at least 14-20% of casualties have<br />

TBI that require acute and long term care 3<br />

• Mild TBI cases are not being identified. 40% of<br />

these patients experience vision problems. 3<br />

Biochemical Basis of Neuro-Disruption 4<br />

Breakdown of intimate<br />

association of cerebral<br />

blood flow (CBF) and<br />

cerebral glucose<br />

metabolism (CMGL)<br />

Cell<br />

toxicity<br />

Ischemia and<br />

hypoxia<br />

Metabolic<br />

imbalances<br />

Change<br />

neuronal cell<br />

membrane<br />

permeability<br />

Most Common Visual Diagnoses<br />

Following TBI<br />

• Convergence Insufficiency<br />

• Strabismus<br />

• Accommodative Insufficiency<br />

• Accommodative Infacility<br />

• Ocular Motility Disorders<br />

• Visual Field Defects<br />

• Photosensitivity<br />

• Dry Eye<br />

Case History<br />

• Did you lose consciousness Did you feel heat or pressure during blast<br />

• Did the blast affect your hearing<br />

• Are you more sensitive to light Noise<br />

• Blurry or double vision<br />

• Headaches<br />

• Balance problems<br />

• Feel dizzy Do you feel this way when you move your eyes<br />

• Bump into things<br />

• Miss objects when first reach Have difficulty judging depth of stairs<br />

• Poor concentration, memory, or attention<br />

• Difficulty thinking or solving problems Identifying objects<br />

• Trouble with speech<br />

• Overstimulated Overwhelmed Do things that didn’t bother you, now do<br />

• Change of emotions Short-tempered<br />

• Anxious Depressed Dreams of traumatic past events Fatigue easily<br />

• Are there things you used to be able to do and can’t anymore<br />

• Does the floor look tilted Do walls or floor shift and move<br />

• Cranial nerve questions<br />

BIVSS SYMPTOM CHECKLIST<br />

Please check the most appropriate box, or circle the item number that best matches your observations. Alll<br />

information will be held in confidence. Circle a number below. Please rate each behavior.<br />

How often does each behavior occur (circle a number) Never Seldom Occasionally Frequently Always<br />

EYESIGHT CLARITY<br />

Distance vision blurred and not clear -- even with lenses 0 1 2 3 4<br />

Near vision blurred and not clear -- even with lenses 0 1 2 3 4<br />

Clarity of vision changes or fluctuates during the day 0 1 2 3 4<br />

Poor night vision / can’t see well to drive at night 0 1 2 3 4<br />

VISUAL COMFORT<br />

Eye discomfort / sore eyes / eyestrain 0 1 2 3 4<br />

Headaches or dizziness after using eyes 0 1 2 3 4<br />

Eye fatigue / very tired after using eyes all day 0 1 2 3 4<br />

Feel “pulling” around the eyes 0 1 2 3 4<br />

DOUBLING<br />

Double vision -- especially when tired 0 1 2 3 4<br />

Have to close or cover one eye to see clearly 0 1 2 3 4<br />

Print moves in and out of focus when reading 0 1 2 3 4<br />

Coursebook Page 25 of 139<br />

6


5/31/2012<br />

BIVSS SYMPTOM CHECKLIST<br />

LIGHT SENSITIVITY<br />

Normal indoor lighting is uncomfortable – too much glare 0 1 2 3 4<br />

Outdoor light too bright – have to use sunglasses 0 1 2 3 4<br />

Indoors fluorescent lighting is bothersome or annoying 0 1 2 3 4<br />

DRY EYES<br />

Eyes feel “dry” and sting 0 1 2 3 4<br />

“Stare” into space without blinking 0 1 2 3 4<br />

Have to rub the eyes a lot 0 1 2 3 4<br />

DEPTH PERCEPTION<br />

Clumsiness / misjudge where objects really are 0 1 2 3 4<br />

Lack of confidence walking / missing steps / stumbling 0 1 2 3 4<br />

Poor handwriting (spacing, size, legibility) 0 1 2 3 4<br />

PERIPHERAL VISION<br />

Side vision distorted / objects move or change position 0 1 2 3 4<br />

What looks straight ahead--isn’t always straight ahead 0 1 2 3 4<br />

Avoid crowds / can’t tolerate “visually-busy” places 0 1 2 3 4<br />

READING<br />

Short attention span / easily distracted when reading 0 1 2 3 4<br />

Difficulty / slowness with reading and writing 0 1 2 3 4<br />

Poor reading comprehension / can’t remember what was read 0 1 2 3 4<br />

Confusion of words / skip words during reading 0 1 2 3 4<br />

Lose place / have to use finger not to lose place when reading 0 1 2 3 4<br />

Home Training Kit $325<br />

• 1-patch, 1-Brock String (large), 1-Marsden Ball<br />

• R/G glasses<br />

• 2-Lifesaver cards (Clear and Opaque)<br />

• 10-loose lenses (+.50, +1.00, +1.50, +2.00, +2.50, -.1.00, -2.00,<br />

-3.00, -4.00, -5.00)<br />

• 4-flipper lenses: (+/- 1.00, +/- 1.50, +/- 2.00, +/- 2.50)<br />

• Loose Prisms: 4, 6, 8, 12 pd<br />

• Tranaglyphs:<br />

6-one-piece fixed:<br />

BC 71, BC 72 vertical<br />

BC 51, BC 52, BC 53, BC 54<br />

3-two-piece variable: BC 920H (horizontal mini), BC 520, BC 802<br />

• Tranaglyph holder<br />

• Reading Bars for suppression monitoring<br />

Resources<br />

• DVBIC (Defense and Veterans Brain Injury<br />

Center)www.dvbic.org<br />

• NORA (Neuro-Optometric Rehabilitation<br />

Association)www.nora.cc<br />

• Resources for returning Veterans:<br />

http://www.oefoif.va.gov<br />

• www.Bernell.com<br />

• http://oep.excerpo.com/<br />

References<br />

1. Langlois JA, Rutland-Brown W, Thomas KE.Traumatic brain injury in the United States:<br />

emergency department visits, hospitalizations and deaths. Atlanta GA: Centers for Disease<br />

Control and Prevention, National Center for Injury Prevention and Control, 2004.<br />

2. Thurmann D, Alverson C, Dunn K, Guerro J,Sniezek J. Traumatic brain injury in the United<br />

States: a public health perspective. J Head Trauma Rehab 1999;14:602-15.<br />

3. Traumatic Brain Injury, Veterans Health Initiative: Department of Veterans Affairs,<br />

Employee Education System; January 2004.<br />

4. Center for Neuro Skills. http://www.neuroskills.com/brain-injury/the-neuro-biochemicalbasis-of-post-trauma-vision-syndrome.php<br />

5. Scheiman and Wick. Clinical Management of Binocular Vision: Heterophoric,<br />

Accommodative, and Eye Movement Disorders<br />

6. Griffin and Grisham. Binocular Anomalies: <strong>Diagnosis</strong> and Vision Therapy<br />

7. NORA meeting notes. Atlanta 2011.<br />

8. Medscape: Epidemiology and Classification of Traumatic Brain Injury<br />

Thank you!<br />

Coursebook Page 26 of 139<br />

7


5/29/2012<br />

Overview<br />

CASE STUDY:<br />

THE EVOLUTION AND RESOLUTION OF AN<br />

OCULOMOTOR NERVE PALSY<br />

PRESENTER: JESSICA DENNIS - JNDMAIL@YAHOO.COM<br />

INSTRUCTOR: DOUGLAS DEVRIES - EMAIL<br />

Case presentation<br />

<strong>Differential</strong> diagnoses and assessment<br />

Pathway and function of oculomotor nerve<br />

Plan<br />

Referrals<br />

Follow ups<br />

Additional information<br />

Questions<br />

Eye Care Associates of Nevada - 2285 Green Vista- Sparks, NV 89431<br />

Ring ring<br />

Presentation (11/14/2012)<br />

ER doctor calls Saturday night<br />

CC: dull eye ache/pain OS<br />

• Stable VAs<br />

Reports normal eye examination including<br />

• Full EOMs, no pain/diplopia<br />

• Pupils normal, no APD<br />

• No AC reaction<br />

• Normal CT scan<br />

Initial assessments…<br />

Follow up with Ophthalmologist Monday<br />

Demographics-<br />

54 year old<br />

African American male<br />

Medical history:<br />

• Heart disease<br />

• High blood pressure<br />

• Diabetes, type II<br />

• Insulin dependent<br />

• Peripheral diabetic neuropathy<br />

• Hemodialysis secondary to diabetic nephropathy<br />

ROS:<br />

• Hearing loss, chronic cough, arthritis, easy fatigability, depression, kidney failure<br />

Current medications:<br />

• Alprazolam, amlodipine, aspirin, Coreg, gabapentin, insulin, Prevacid, nitroglycerine,<br />

Coumadin, Zovirax<br />

Ocular history:<br />

• Cataract extraction OU (5/2011)<br />

Presentation (11/14/2012)<br />

Examination (11/14/2012)<br />

CC: “Worried implant moved”<br />

HPI:<br />

Constant dull ache OS<br />

• No jaw claudication or temporal pain<br />

• Trace photophobia<br />

(+) diplopia for 2 days, goes away if OD covered<br />

• Vertical and horizontal, distance and near<br />

• Stable, constant<br />

Slight blur/fuzzy VA OS<br />

Reports blood glucose in the low 100’s<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

VA(sc)<br />

OD: 20/20<br />

OS: 20/25- , PH 20/25+<br />

CVF:<br />

full OD, OS<br />

EOMs:<br />

full OD<br />

Normal primary gaze- no exotropia or hypotropia<br />

Adduction and infraduction gaze restrictions OS, (+) diplopia<br />

Pupils:<br />

Aniso OS>OD in light and dim illuminations<br />

Slow reaction to light OS<br />

Normal near response<br />

No APD<br />

Hertel:<br />

21>-----


5/29/2012<br />

Examination (11/14/2012)<br />

Anterior segment<br />

Ptosis OS<br />

Trace SPK OU<br />

PCIOL OU<br />

1+ PCO OS<br />

Examination (11/14/2012)<br />

Posterior segment<br />

Questionable mild pallor ONH OS<br />

Tortuous vessels OU<br />

(+) trace cellophane changes OU<br />

Scattered dot/blot hemes in all four quadrants OU<br />

• possible IRMA/NVE superotemporal arcades OS<br />

Abnormal findings…<br />

DDx<br />

Abnormal EOMs OS<br />

Pupil OS<br />

Ptosis OS<br />

Diabetic/heart conditions…<br />

DDx<br />

Partial oculomotor nerve palsy<br />

Strabismus<br />

Decompensated phoria<br />

Myasthenia Gravis<br />

Grave’s<br />

Orbital fracture<br />

Internuclear ophthalmoplegia<br />

Duane’s type II<br />

Brown’s<br />

Strabismus and Decompensated Phorias<br />

Perform cover test in different fields of gaze<br />

Results comitant or non-comitant<br />

Non-comitant considered greater then 5 prism diopters<br />

of difference between<br />

Non-comitant generally implies cranial nerve palsies<br />

Comitant usually indicates strabismus<br />

Paretic or mechanical<br />

Ductions (monocular eye movement)<br />

Versions (binocular eye movement, physiologic H)<br />

Ductions>Versions<br />

Paretic<br />

Ductions=Versions<br />

Mechanical<br />

Forced duction testing<br />

Drop the suspected eye with anesthetic<br />

Grab conjunctiva with toothless forceps near limbus and attempt to move eye in<br />

direction opposite that mechanical restriction is thought<br />

+ forced duction means eye did NOT move<br />

Indicates mechanical restriction<br />

- forced duction means eye DID move<br />

Indicates paretic in nature<br />

Coursebook Page 28 of 139<br />

2


5/29/2012<br />

History is key…<br />

Myasthenia Gravis<br />

Grave’s<br />

Orbital fracture<br />

Review<br />

Internuclear ophthalmoplegia<br />

Lesion of MLF<br />

Ipsilateral adduction deficit with abducting nystagmus is<br />

opposite eye<br />

Duane’s type II<br />

Adduction deficit<br />

No globe retraction<br />

Brown’s<br />

Superior oblique tendon sheath syndrome<br />

Limited elevation in adduction<br />

Assessment<br />

1. Left partial CN III palsy, relative pupil sparing<br />

2. IDDM with moderate to severe NPDR OD<br />

IDDM with likely NPDR OS<br />

Oculomotor nerve review<br />

Origination and pathway<br />

Efferent pupillary pathway<br />

OM nerve functions<br />

Partial, complete, isolated<br />

3. Pseudophakic OU<br />

4. PCO OS<br />

Origin<br />

Oculomotor nuclear complex<br />

http://www.neuroanatomy.wisc.edu/virtualbrain/BrainStem/21CNIII.html<br />

Coursebook Page 29 of 139<br />

3


5/29/2012<br />

Origin<br />

Pathway<br />

http://radiologymri.blogspot.com/2010/12/oculomotor-infarct.html<br />

http://www.medrounds.org/ocular-pathology-study-guide/uploaded_images/cwmr-768439.jpg<br />

Pathway<br />

Pathway<br />

http://bestpractice.bmj.com/best-practice/monograph/956/basics/pathophysiology.html<br />

http://legacy.owensboro.kctcs.edu/gcaplan/anat/notes/api%20notes%20m%20%20peripheral%20nerves.htm<br />

Functions<br />

Edinger-Westphal (Efferent pupillary pathway review)<br />

Superior division:<br />

levator palpebrae superioris*<br />

superior rectus<br />

Inferior division:<br />

medial rectus*<br />

inferior rectus*<br />

inferior oblique<br />

- preganglionic parasympathetic to ciliary ganglion<br />

(innervation of sphincter pupillae* and ciliary muscle)<br />

http://brains.oxfordmedicine.com/cgi/content-nw/full/12/1/med-9780198569381-chapter-002/FIG002037<br />

Coursebook Page 30 of 139<br />

4


5/29/2012<br />

Types<br />

Recall assessment<br />

<br />

Pupil involving<br />

Aneurysm, tumor, trauma, cavernous sinus mass, pituitary<br />

apoplexy, herpes zoster<br />

1. Isolated left partial CN III palsy<br />

-relative pupil sparing<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

Relative pupil sparing<br />

Ischemic microvascular disease*<br />

Pupil sparing<br />

Ischemic microvascular disease, GCA<br />

Isolated<br />

Partial or complete<br />

2. IDDM with moderate to severe NPDR OD<br />

IDDM with likely NPDR OS<br />

3. Pseudophakic OU<br />

4. PCO OS>OD<br />

Plan<br />

1. Order MRI of brain/orbits****<br />

- Request CT scan<br />

- Neuro-ophthalmic consult<br />

2. Retina specialist consult for likely PDR<br />

3. Yag laser OS<br />

Treatment options for diplopia:<br />

Patching (remember not to patch patients


5/29/2012<br />

11/30/2012 continued<br />

MRI w/o contrast<br />

<br />

Examination continued…<br />

Anisocoria OS>OD<br />

OS down and to the left<br />

EOMs OS<br />

• Supraduction, infraduction, adduction restricted<br />

• normal abduction<br />

Negative forced ductions**<br />

Complete ptosis OS<br />

Maxillofacial CT scan (11/12/11) – normal<br />

MRI (11/15/2011)<br />

Brain<br />

Findings<br />

No mass effects or shift of midline structures<br />

No hemorrhagic lesions<br />

No evidence of acute cerebral infarction<br />

Impression<br />

Minimal age related cortical atrophy<br />

Microvascular ishemic gliosis<br />

Wedge shaped area of chronic infarction, left occipital lobe<br />

11/30/2012 continued<br />

12/22/2011<br />

Assessment:<br />

Pupillary involving left oculomotor palsy…<br />

Diabetic (ischemic microvascular) third nerve palsies spare pupil…<br />

Order MR angiogram of head and neck to r/o posterior communicating artery aneurysm<br />

Left occipital infarct<br />

HVF<br />

Diabetic retinopathy OU<br />

Ordered the following lab studies:<br />

• CBC<br />

• ESR/CRP<br />

• ACE level<br />

• ANA<br />

• PRP<br />

Trial dispense of celebrex for pain<br />

RTC 1 month<br />

Patient reports slight increase on inward eye movement and<br />

complete relief of pain with celebrex<br />

Examination:<br />

Slightly improved motilities on supraduction and adduction<br />

HVF 30-2:<br />

Scattered defects<br />

Lab results:<br />

CBC: normal<br />

Metabolic panel: elevated glucose level<br />

ANA, ACE, ESR, RPR, vit B12, folate: normal<br />

MR angiogram (12/9/2011):<br />

Circle of Wilis: normal<br />

Neck: normal carotid arteries<br />

12/22/2012 continued<br />

Assessment:<br />

<br />

1. Marginally improved pupillary involving left<br />

oculomotor palsy<br />

**Importantly “no clear-cut evidence of posterior<br />

communicating artery aneursym”<br />

2. Left occipital lobe infarction<br />

- No HVF defects<br />

3. Bilateral diabetic retinopathy<br />

RTC 1 month<br />

03/01/2012<br />

Missed appointments… things must be better<br />

Yes! No double vision, pain and ptosis improved<br />

EOMs, pupils<br />

Examination showed full recovery of adduction,<br />

supraduction and infraduction!<br />

Pupils showed slight aniso (4.5 OD, 5.0 OS)<br />

Coursebook Page 32 of 139<br />

6


5/29/2012<br />

Summary of Retinal Appointments<br />

Retinal Consultation<br />

Dr. Jarl Nielsen<br />

Nevada Retina Associates<br />

610 Sierra Rose Drive<br />

Reno, NV 89511<br />

11/15/2011 (OD 20/20, OS 20/25)<br />

NPDR OD, Early PDR OS<br />

12/20/2011 (OD 20/20, OS 20/40)<br />

IVFA performed<br />

PDR OS>OD<br />

PRP OS performed<br />

01/10/2012 (OD 20/20, OS 20/40)<br />

PRP OS<br />

1/31/2012 (OD 20/20, OS 20/30)<br />

PRP OS<br />

RTC for DFE OD, possible PRP<br />

Summary of Retinal Appointments<br />

Summary of Retinal Appointments<br />

02/07/2012 (OD 20/20, OS 20/30)<br />

DFE OD minimally active NVE<br />

Stable OS<br />

Follow up in 2-4 weeks, PRP OD<br />

02/28/2012<br />

PRP OD<br />

03/20/2012<br />

PRP OD<br />

05/08/2012<br />

Involuting NVE OD<br />

No active NVE OS<br />

RTC 1 month<br />

04/10/2012<br />

PRP OD<br />

03/05/2012<br />

Back to Eye Care Associates…<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

Referred back by Dr. Hershewe for possible conjunctivitis<br />

SLE:<br />

2+ injected nasal and temporal pinguecula<br />

Trace to 1+ diffuse SPK<br />

PCO OS>OD<br />

Assessment:<br />

Pingueculitis OD>OS<br />

Dry eye syndrome<br />

Plan:<br />

Continue FML qid (as dispensed by Dr. Hershewe)<br />

add artificial tear use<br />

RTC for YAG OS 1 st , then OD<br />

Coursebook Page 33 of 139<br />

7


5/29/2012<br />

03/14/2012<br />

Lastly, addressing “slight blur OS”<br />

VA post laser treatment<br />

• OD: 20/20<br />

• OS: 20/20-<br />

Additional information<br />

Possible CN III locations of involvement<br />

Aberrant regeneration<br />

Food for thought<br />

And full motilities!<br />

RTC annually<br />

Follow up with Dr. Nielsen as scheduled<br />

Location of palsy<br />

Midbrain damage<br />

All or part of nucleus may be affected<br />

• More commonly entire nucleus<br />

If entire nucleus<br />

• Ipsilateral muscles involved: MR, IR IO<br />

• Contralateral muscles involved: SR<br />

• Both: levators<br />

CN IV nucleus close by…<br />

• Is contralateral superior oblique involved<br />

Location of palsy<br />

Intracranial<br />

As previously discussed, posterior communicating artery<br />

common location for aneurysm to affect oculomotor<br />

nerve<br />

Less common are posterior cerebral and superior<br />

cerebellar arteries<br />

Location of palsy<br />

Cavernous sinus<br />

Ipsilateral CN IV involvement possible<br />

Ophthalmic division of V<br />

Maxillary division of V<br />

Eye would be out (only LR working) and facial anesthesia<br />

would be present<br />

Orbital<br />

Retrobulbar tumor or inflammation<br />

• CN VI and nasociliary nerves involved secondary to close location<br />

in muscle cone<br />

Eye would be down, slightly out (only SO working)<br />

http://www.oculist.net/downaton502/prof/ebook/duanes/pages/v1/v1c003.html<br />

Coursebook Page 34 of 139<br />

8


5/29/2012<br />

CN III aberrant regeneration<br />

Fibers making incorrect connections<br />

Can occur from the following<br />

Congenital<br />

Primary<br />

Acquired… damage or compression<br />

• During recovery<br />

• NOT ISCHEMIC!!!<br />

CN III aberrant regeneration<br />

1. Pseudo graefe sign<br />

levator superioris and inferior rectus<br />

2. Eyelid dyskinesis<br />

levator superioris and medial rectus<br />

3. Pupil dyskinesis<br />

parasympathetic fibers and medial rectus<br />

Food for thought<br />

86% of pupil involved are from aneurysms<br />

23% of pupil involved are vascular/ischemic<br />

14% of pupil sparing are from aneurysms<br />

77% of pupil sparing are vascular/ischemic<br />

Food for thought<br />

95% of painful CN III palsies are caused by<br />

aneurysms<br />

80% of painful CN III palsies are ischemic/vascular<br />

Pain not a very good differential<br />

Kissel JT. Ann Neurol 1983<br />

Goldstein JE, et al. Arch Ophthalmol 1960<br />

Clinical Pearls<br />

Questions<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

Case history<br />

Investigate the double vision<br />

• Monocular or binocular<br />

• Vertical or horizontal<br />

• Distance or at near<br />

Comitant or non-comitant<br />

Forced duction testing!<br />

Photo document<br />

Don’t forget imaging guidelines<br />

Can be an ocular emergency!!<br />

Send for proper referrals<br />

Atypical cases… not all are textbook<br />

Special thanks to:<br />

Curtis Manning, MD<br />

Paul W Hiss, MD<br />

Douglas Devries, OD<br />

Gerard L Hershewe, DO<br />

Jarl Nielsen, MD<br />

Coursebook Page 35 of 139<br />

9


5/29/2012<br />

Oliver<br />

Oliver<br />

Kuhn-Wilken,<br />

Kuhn-Wilken,<br />

O.D.<br />

O.D.<br />

Jeffery Hiett, O.D. and Irene Yang, O.D.<br />

Drs. Jeffery Hiett and Irene Yang<br />

Jonee Brandt, O.D. and Jason Bleazard, O.D.<br />

Drs. Jonee Brandt American and Lake Jason VA Bleazard Hospital<br />

American Lakewood, VA Washington Hospital<br />

Lakewood, Washington<br />

The Problem with<br />

Prostaglandins<br />

Case #1: BW<br />

• 71 yo white male<br />

• CC: vision OD is “like spots on a shower door” x 6 months,<br />

gradual onset, now constant, am = pm, distance = near.<br />

• POHx: POAG treated with TravatanZ qhs OU<br />

cataract extraction with PCIOL (2006) and YAG OU<br />

• PMHx: COPD<br />

sleep apnea with CPAP cannulas<br />

• VAs sc: OD 20/50-2 PHNI, OS 20/20-1<br />

• Tap OD 11 mmHg, OS 13 mmHg @ 0900<br />

• SLE: ONH: c/d ratio OD 0.65 with pallor, OS 0.30<br />

macula: OD elevation at fovea, OS normal<br />

Case #1: BW<br />

• Stratus OCT:<br />

foveal thickness<br />

OD 541 um,<br />

OS 214 um<br />

Case #1: BW<br />

• Assessment: cystoid macular edema OD<br />

• Plan: discontinue TravatanZ<br />

Rx dorzolamide 2% bid OU<br />

Rx ketorolac 0.4% qid OD<br />

Case #1: BW<br />

Exam Date Foveal thickness OD BCVA OD IOP OD<br />

8/19/2011 541um 20/50-2 11<br />

8/30/2011 475um 20/40-2 15<br />

9/13/2011 298um 20/40 17<br />

9/27/2011 252um 20/30+1 18<br />

10/27/2011 275um 20/40 19<br />

CME fundus appearance<br />

OCT<br />

OD:10/27/2<br />

011<br />

CME fundus<br />

appearance<br />

Coursebook Page 36 of 139<br />

1


5/29/2012<br />

CME<br />

Cystic spaces<br />

on OCT:<br />

CME can follow<br />

ant. seg. inflammation<br />

• Anterior uveitis<br />

• Cataract surgery (Irvine-Gass Syndrome) or YAG<br />

Late-phase petalloid appearance on FA:<br />

CME can follow<br />

post. seg. inflammation<br />

• Retinal venous occlusions<br />

• Epiretinal membrane<br />

• Diabetic retinopathy<br />

• ARMD<br />

Edema<br />

of<br />

Müller<br />

cells<br />

Edema<br />

of the<br />

Edema optic<br />

of nerve the<br />

optic<br />

nerve<br />

The Prostaglandin Analogs<br />

• First line glaucoma therapy<br />

• Possible pro-inflammatory effect<br />

• Relative contraindications: cataract surgery<br />

uveitis<br />

herpes simplex keratitis<br />

epiretinal membrane<br />

pregnancy<br />

Coursebook Page 37 of 139<br />

2


5/29/2012<br />

The Inflammatory Cascade<br />

The Hidden Cost of CME<br />

• 1-2% of CE patients diagnosed with “clinical CME.”<br />

• 20% of patients have “angiographic CME.”<br />

0.8<br />

LogMAR vision versus time following cataract extraction<br />

ETDRS vision in LogMAR units<br />

0.7<br />

0.6<br />

0.5<br />

0.4<br />

0.3<br />

0.2<br />

0.1<br />

No CME<br />

CME at 8 weeks<br />

0<br />

Pre-op Day 1 Day 14 Day 30 Day 60<br />

Ursell PG, Spalton DJ, Whitcup SM, et al.<br />

CME and cataract surgery<br />

• The biggest risk factors:<br />

uncontrolled diabetes or hypertension<br />

CME following CE in the fellow eye<br />

CE with breach of the posterior capsule<br />

retinal venous disease<br />

epiretinal membrane<br />

PGs and cataract surgery<br />

• There is no Gold Standard.<br />

• Recommendation: cover with an NSAID<br />

qid for 2-7 days prior to surgery.<br />

• Do not discontinue or replace a<br />

prostaglandin.<br />

Management of CME<br />

• NSAID qid<br />

• Pred Forte qid<br />

• Consider replacing a prostaglandin<br />

• Referral if not improving: consider sub-<br />

Tenon’s injection, intravitreal injection, or<br />

vitrectomy<br />

PGs<br />

and<br />

uveitis<br />

• Uveitis is an inflammatory disease<br />

• PGs may have a pro-inflammatory effect<br />

• Therefore PGs are relatively<br />

contraindicated in uveitic patients.<br />

• Contraindication is rarely observed<br />

Coursebook Page 38 of 139<br />

3


5/29/2012<br />

PGs and uveitis<br />

Study No. of eyes Time Uveitic response<br />

Warwar 1998 163 normals 1 year 6.4%<br />

Smith 1999 505 normals 1 year 1.0%<br />

Smith 1999 13 uveitics 1 year 23.1% Mostly mild cases<br />

Chang 2008 163 uveitics 3 mos.<br />

Markomichelakis<br />

2008 58 uveitics 6 mos.<br />

equal to<br />

control<br />

equal to<br />

control<br />

Control = fellow eye, non PG<br />

glaucoma medication<br />

Control =<br />

dorzolamide/timolol<br />

medication<br />

PGs and uveitis<br />

• Case studies describe patients in whom<br />

uveitis occurs in the ipsilaterally treated<br />

eye, and patients in whom the uveitis<br />

improves after cessation and recurs after<br />

rechallenge.<br />

• Latanoprost may not lower IOP during a<br />

uveitic flare.<br />

Goldberg 2008 5,856 normals 5 years OD<br />

laser burns OS peripheral retina, no tear<br />

Case #2: HF<br />

• Assessment: herpes simplex keratitis OS.<br />

• Plan: Rx Viroptic q2h OS, acyclovir<br />

400mg bid po, and erythromycin ung qhs<br />

OS.<br />

Case #2: HF<br />

Date VA OS Assessment Current medications<br />

10/25/07 20/200 Acute HSK OS TravatanZ qhs OU, timolol 0.5%<br />

GFSqam OU (continued)<br />

10/29/07 20/200 “Improving” Viroptic q2hr OS, erythromycin ung<br />

qhs OS (continued)<br />

11/02/07 20/200 “Improving” Viroptic 5x/day OS with taper,<br />

acyclovir 400 mg po bid<br />

11/09/07 4/300 “No improvement” Viroptic 5x/day OS, acyclovir 400mg<br />

po bid (continued)<br />

11/13/07 5/200-1 “Improving” Taper Viroptic over 4 days<br />

11/16/07 5/200-1 “Slowly improving” Viroptic qd x 2 days then d/c<br />

11/19/07 5/200- “Resolving” Refresh tears qid OS<br />

11/26/07 5/250 “Resolving” no change<br />

11/30/07 5/200 “no improvement” Replace erythro with bacitracin ung<br />

12/3/07 5/200- “Resolving” no change<br />

12/7/07 5/225 “Resolved” Replace baci with erythro ung qhs OU<br />

Case #2: HF<br />

Date VA OS Assessment Plan<br />

12/14/07 4/160 “Resolving” TravatanZ qhs OU, timolol 0.5% GFSqam<br />

OU, acyclovir 400 mg po bid (continued)<br />

12/31/07 4/160 “Resolving” no change<br />

2/5/08 5/700 Active disciform<br />

HSK<br />

Viroptic 5x/day OS,<br />

acyclovir 400 mg po bid (continued)<br />

2/8/08 2/125 “Resolving” Viroptic 5x.day OS<br />

2/11/08 2/125 “Resolving” Viroptid qid OS<br />

2/15/08 3/400 “Resolving” Viroptic qd OS x 1 day then d/c<br />

2/20/08 3/350 “Improving” D/c Viroptic. D/c TravatanZ OS<br />

2/25/08 3/350 “Improving” no change<br />

3/4/08 5/350 “improvement” D/c TravatanZ OD<br />

3/7/08 5/350 “continued<br />

no change<br />

improvement”<br />

3/14/08 5/300 “stable” no change<br />

Coursebook Page 39 of 139<br />

4


5/29/2012<br />

PGs and herpes simplex keratitis<br />

PGs and herpes simplex keratitis<br />

Study Patients Time HSK rate Caveat<br />

Bean 2004 39,174 normals<br />

on PG therapy<br />

6 years 0.11% Only counted 1 st occurrence<br />

Only counted if within 7<br />

days of PG start<br />

Lead researcher employed<br />

by Pfizer<br />

Research paid for by Pfizer<br />

• Case studies: HSK reported to recur after<br />

up to 10 years of inactivity upon<br />

commencement of latanoprost use, and be<br />

unresponsive to anti-viral therapy until<br />

the latanoprost is discontinued.<br />

• No other large studies<br />

References<br />

Prostaglandin take-homes<br />

1. Cover with an NSAID prior to CE if there<br />

are any risk factors.<br />

2. Uveitis or HSK due to PGs is very rare.<br />

3. Strongly consider discontinuing PGs<br />

once CME, uveitis, or HSK occurs.<br />

• Giuffre G. The effects of prostaglandin F2 in the human eye. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol<br />

1985;222:139-41.<br />

• Benitah, Nicole R. MD; Arroyo, Jorge G. MD. Pseudophakic Cystoid Macular Edema. International<br />

Ophthalmology Clinics: Winter 2010 - Volume 50 - Issue 1 - pp 139-153. doi:<br />

10.1097/IIO.0b013e3181c551da. extraction: a fluorescein funduscopic and angiographic study. Arch<br />

Ophthalmol. 1966;76:646.<br />

• Yanoff M, Fine BS, Brucker AJ, et al. Pathology of Human Cystoid Macular Edema. Surv Opthalmol 28<br />

(Suppl): 505-511, 1984.<br />

• Miyake K, Ibaraki N. Prostaglandins and Cystoid Macular Edema. Surv Opthalmol 47 (Supplement 1):<br />

S203-S218, 2002.<br />

• Warren K. Current Concepts in the Etiology and Treatment of Pseudophakic Cystoid Macular Edema.<br />

Retinal Physician: http://www.retinalphysician.com/printarticle.aspxarticle=103062, 6/1/2009.<br />

Accessed 03/06/2012.<br />

• Ursell PG, Spalton DJ, Whitcup SM, et al. Cystoid macular edema after phacoemulsification: relationship<br />

to blood-aqueous barrier damage and visual acuity. J Cataract Refract Surg. 1999; 25:1492-1497.<br />

• Ngyuen, Q. The role of prostaglandin analogs in the treatment of glaucoma in the 21 st century. Int.<br />

Ophthalmol Clin 2004;44:2:15-27.<br />

• Arcieri ES, Santana A, Rocha FN, et al. Blood-aqueous barrier changes after the use of prostaglandin<br />

analogues in patients with pseudophakia and aphakia. Arch Ophthalmol. 2005;123:186-192.<br />

• Miyake K, Ota I, Maekubo K, et al. Latanoprost accelerates disruption of the blood-aquous barrier and<br />

the incidence of angiographic cystoid macular edema in early postoperative pseudophakias. Arch<br />

Ophthalmol. 199;117:34-40.<br />

References<br />

• Shrivastava A. Prostaglandins, cataract surgery and CME. Review of Ophthalmology. 07/22/2009.<br />

• Camras CB, Bhuyan KC, Podos SM, et al. Multiple dosing of prostaglandin F2 or epinephrine on<br />

cynomolgus monkey eyes. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1987;28:921-6.<br />

• Arcieri ES, Pierre Filho PT, Wakamatsu TH. The effects of prostaglandin analogues on the blood aqueous<br />

barrier and corneal thickness of phakic patients with primary open-angle glaucoma and ocular<br />

hypertension. Eye (Lond). 2008 Feb; 22(2):179-183.<br />

• Warner RE, Bullock JD, Ballal D. Cystoid macular edema and anterior uveitis associated with latanoprost<br />

use: experience and incidence in a retrospective review of 94 patients. Opthalmology. 1998;105:263-268.<br />

• Chang JK, McCluskey P, Missotten T, et al. Use of ocular hypotensive prostaglandin analogues in<br />

patients with uveitis: does their use increase anterior uveitis and cystoid macular edema Br J<br />

Ophthalmol. 2008 Jul;92(7):916-21.<br />

• Goldberg I, Li XY, Selaru P, et al. A 5-year, randomized, open-label safety study of latanoprost and usual<br />

care in patients with open-angle glaucoma or ocular hypertension. Eur J Ophthalmol. 2008;18(3):408-416.<br />

• Wand M, Gilbert CM Liesegang Tj. Latanoprost and herpes simplex keratitis. Am J Ophthalmol<br />

1999:127(5):602-604.<br />

• Bean G, Reardon G, Zimmerman TJ. Association between ocular herpes simplex virus and topical ocular<br />

hypotensive therapy. J Glaucoma. 2004;13(5):361-364.<br />

Coursebook Page 40 of 139<br />

5


*<br />

<strong>Diagnosis</strong> and Management of<br />

Posner-Schlossman Syndrome<br />

Jonee Brandt O.D.<br />

VA Puget Sound Health Care System: American Lake<br />

Division<br />

jonee.brandt@gmail.com<br />

What is Posner-Schlossman<br />

Syndrome<br />

• First described in 1948 by Abraham Schlossman and Adolf Posner<br />

who had a series of 9 patients with similar symptoms and<br />

characteristics of both glaucoma and uveitis.<br />

• Uncommon inflammatory eye condition, classically unilateral, with<br />

elevated intraocular pressures and minimal inflammation.<br />

• Recurrent<br />

• Tends to occur in young-middle aged adults, male>female, with no<br />

racial predilection.<br />

• Accounts for about 4% of all anterior uveititis.<br />

Typical Presentation<br />

*Acute intermittent history of mild blurred vision and minimal unilateral<br />

discomfort<br />

*Mild conjunctival injection, minimal anterior chamber reaction, small to<br />

medium keratitic precipitates, NO posterior synechiae, possible iris<br />

heterochromia/sectoral atrophy, and markedly elevated IOP.<br />

*Acute attacks will resolve spontaneously in a matter of days-weeks<br />

*Recurrence of attacks can vary greatly from patient to patient<br />

<strong>Differential</strong> Diagnoses<br />

• Herpes Simplex Trabeculitis<br />

- Viral infection of endothelial cells of TM, cellular swelling and lysis 2’ to<br />

immune attacks<br />

- Management: IOP control, antivirals, and concurrent topical steroid tx<br />

- May also present with: corneal endotheliitis and 2’ edema<br />

- (+)HSV, possible h/o keratitis<br />

●<br />

<strong>Differential</strong> Diagnoses<br />

Fuch's Heterochromic Iridocyclitis<br />

● Iris heterochromia<br />

● Chronic mild unilateral anterior uveitis which does<br />

NOT respond to steroid treatment<br />

● Triad of heterochromia, cataract, and glaucoma<br />

<strong>Differential</strong> Diagnoses<br />

• Pigmentary Glaucoma<br />

-Krukenberg’s spindle, iris TID’s,<br />

pigment in TM<br />

-glaucomatous changes to optic nerve<br />

head<br />

• Angle Closure/Angle<br />

Closure Glaucoma<br />

-closed angle on gonioscopy<br />

-likely more severe symptoms:<br />

including nausea/vomiting, facial<br />

pain, haloes around lights<br />

Coursebook Page 41 of 139<br />

1


*<br />

<strong>Differential</strong> Diagnoses<br />

• Ankylosing Spondylitis<br />

– Lower back pain<br />

– X-Ray of sacral spinal region and<br />

HLA-B27<br />

• Reiter’s Syndrome<br />

– Triad of arthritis, conjunctivitis,<br />

urethritis<br />

– HLA-B27<br />

• Behcet’s Disease<br />

– Mouth, skin, and/or genital ulcers<br />

– Mediterranean descent<br />

– HLA-B5<br />

<strong>Differential</strong> Diagnoses<br />

• Juvenile Rheumatoid<br />

Arthritis<br />

– Children<br />

– Girls>Boys<br />

– ANA<br />

• (Granulomatous)-<br />

Syphillis/Sarcoidosis<br />

– RPR/VDRL if suspect syphilis (quick<br />

nonspecific), reflect disease activity vs<br />

FTA-ABS and MHA-TP remain<br />

positive for life, even after active<br />

disease<br />

Indicated Testing<br />

• Complete eye examination, including gonioscopy to rule out angle<br />

closure glaucoma/pigmentary glaucoma<br />

• As Posner Schlossman patients present with markedly elevated IOP<br />

during these recurrent attacks monitor closely for developing<br />

glaucomatous changes: RNFL OCT, Threshold Visual Fields<br />

• Appropriate lab testing to rule out systemic causes of inflammation:<br />

– CRP/ANA/HLA-B27<br />

– HLA-B5<br />

– PPD/Chest X-Ray to rule out TB<br />

– CBC with differential: to determine if bacterial or viral<br />

– RPR/VDRL, FTA-Abs, MHA-TP<br />

Possible Etiologies<br />

• Posner and Schlossman first theorized an infectious<br />

etiology due to episodic nature.<br />

• Viral favored due to intermittence of attacks<br />

• Trabeculitis<br />

• Elevated prostaglandin E<br />

Possible Etiologies<br />

Possible Etiologies<br />

• Cytomegalovirus<br />

– Various small scale studies have found that aqueous aspirates of PSS patients<br />

(+)CMV<br />

– Chee et al had first large scale study with 24/105 anterior uveitis pts (+)CMV, but<br />

18 out of those 24 were found to have PSS. 11/18 (+)CMV reverse transciptase on<br />

PCR, during inactive periods pts were (-)CMV<br />

– HOWEVER, seropositivity testing reveals CMV is common in the general<br />

population (87% seropositivity in Singapore, 60-80% in US)<br />

●<br />

Helicobacter Pylori<br />

– Choi et al examined 40 PSS vs 73 normals<br />

– 80% of PSS pts were (+)H. Pylori by ELISA, vs 56.2% normals<br />

– Postulated theory of direct infection to the eye or that H. Pylori increases host<br />

susceptibility for ocular inflammation, possibly through damage to blood vessels<br />

• Herpes Simplex Virus<br />

– 3 patients with active PSS had PCR on aqueous draws<br />

(+)HSV, (-)CMV, (-)VZV<br />

– Subsequent studies have failed to replicate these results<br />

– Treatment of PSS with Acyclovir has been shown to be<br />

ineffective<br />

Varicella Zoster Virus<br />

– 1985 Varicella skin testing revealed that 5/7 pts had PSS<br />

attacks when immune response to varicella was low on skin<br />

testing, and the other 2 with a high immune response<br />

showed no PSS attacks in a 2 year follow up<br />

– Small sample size<br />

Coursebook Page 42 of 139<br />

2


*<br />

Is Posner Schlossman Syndrome<br />

Benign<br />

• CASE PP: 37 yo AM<br />

1 st exam in 09/2007: Pt at that time reports recurrent uveitic<br />

attacks OD x 5-6x/year and reports he felt he was having an attack at<br />

that time: discomfort and slight blurred vision OD.<br />

VA 20/20- OD, OS<br />

IOP 22 OD, 14 OS mmHg<br />

C/D ratio 0.5 H/V OD, 0.4 H/V OS<br />

Assessment: Recurrent non-granulomatous anterior uveitis OD<br />

Plan: Scopolamine bid, Cosopt bid, Pred Forte q2hr OD, RTC 3<br />

weeks for follow up<br />

Date<br />

Acute<br />

Attack<br />

vs<br />

Follow<br />

Up<br />

Visual Acuity<br />

OD, OS<br />

9/29/2007 AA 20/20‐ OD,<br />

OS<br />

IOP<br />

OD, OS<br />

Present<br />

ocular meds<br />

Plan<br />

22, 14 None PF q2hr,<br />

scop bid,<br />

cosopt bid<br />

OD. RTC 3<br />

days<br />

10/1/07 FU 20/25 OD, OS 12, 12 PF q2hr, scop<br />

bid, cosopt<br />

bid OD<br />

10/5/2007 FU 20/25 OD<br />

20/20 OS<br />

10, 14 PF qid, Scop<br />

bid, Cosopt<br />

bid OD<br />

PF qid,<br />

continue<br />

Scop/coso<br />

pt bid OD<br />

RTC 4<br />

days<br />

Taper PF,<br />

d/c<br />

Cosopt<br />

and scop<br />

OD<br />

RTC 3<br />

weeks<br />

Additional<br />

Recurrent<br />

NG<br />

Anterior<br />

Uveitis<br />

“”<br />

“”<br />

Date AA vs FU Visual<br />

Acuity<br />

OD, OS<br />

1/30/12 AA 20/15,<br />

20/20<br />

2/10/12 FU 20/15,<br />

20/20<br />

3/5/12 FU with<br />

AA:<br />

symptoms<br />

presented<br />

yesterday<br />

20/15,<br />

20/20<br />

3/19/12 FU 20/20 OD,<br />

OS<br />

IOP<br />

OD, OS<br />

Present ocular meds<br />

27, 11 Self initiated PF 1day<br />

ago OD<br />

Plan<br />

PF qid and Brimonidine<br />

bid OD, RTC 10 days<br />

8, 11 PF qid, Brim bid OD Taper PF, continue<br />

Brim bid OD<br />

RTC 3 weeks for<br />

DFE/OCT<br />

32, 12 None Begin PF qid x 2 weeks,<br />

Brim bid OD. RTC 2<br />

weeks.<br />

7, 14 PF qid and Brim qd<br />

OD<br />

Taper PF slowly,<br />

continue brimonidine<br />

bid OD. Begin trial IBU<br />

200mg po tid. F/U in 1<br />

mo.<br />

03/05/12<br />

RNFL thickness OCT<br />

Impression:<br />

Good symmetry in a triple<br />

hump pattern OD, OS.<br />

No glaucomatous RNFL<br />

thinning OD, OS.<br />

Is Posner Schlossman Syndrome<br />

Benign<br />

• Case 2: NH 67 yo AAM<br />

– 2007: OS red with 8/10 pain, photophobia, and cloudy vision. Pt<br />

reports several occurrences over past few years. Last occurrence<br />

3-4 mos ago and reports it usually resolves in 1 week.<br />

• VA 20/20 OD, 20/30- OS<br />

• Pupils: (+)APD OS<br />

• SLE: +KP’s and 1+ cells OS<br />

• IOP 16 OD/48 OS mmHg<br />

• C/D 0.4 OD, 0.6 OS<br />

• Assessment: Trabeculitis OS<br />

• Plan: Alphagan tid OS, Levobunolol bid OS, Dorzolamide bid OS, IOP check<br />

1 day<br />

Date VA IOP Current ocular meds Plan<br />

4/27/07 20/20, 20/25‐ 16, 36 Brim tid, levo bid, dorz bid, PF<br />

qid<br />

5/2/07 20/20, 20/25 16, 15 Brim tid, levo bid, dorz bid, PF<br />

taper<br />

CPM, RTC 5<br />

days<br />

Taper PF, RTC 2<br />

weeks for<br />

CEE/IOP check<br />

6/5/07 20/20, 20/25 18, 18 Self D/C all meds Start Cosopt tx<br />

bid OS, RTC 6<br />

mos for<br />

HVF/OCT/IOP<br />

12/6/07 20/20, 20/25 18, 22 Cosopt bid OS<br />

RTC 6 weeks<br />

for IOP check.<br />

***FDT at this date showed<br />

nasal step and early inferior<br />

arcuate defect OS. C/D 0.4<br />

OD, 0.6 OS<br />

LOST TO FOLLOW UP<br />

4/10/09 20/20, 20/30‐ 19,54 D/C cosopt bid OS<br />

C/D : 0.45 OD, 0.95 OS<br />

***OCT today<br />

Cosopt bid,<br />

Brim bid, PF qid<br />

OS<br />

Coursebook Page 43 of 139<br />

3


*<br />

Date<br />

Visual Acuity<br />

OD, OS<br />

IOP<br />

OD, OS<br />

Current Ocular<br />

Meds<br />

03/2011 20/20, 20/25 17, 18 Cosopt and<br />

Brimonidine<br />

bid OU, PF bid<br />

OS<br />

04/11 20/20, 20/25 20, 25 Cosopt only bid<br />

OU<br />

06/11 20/20, 20/40 16, 15 Cosopt bid,<br />

Brim bid OU<br />

Plan<br />

CPM, D/C PF.<br />

RTC 1 mo with<br />

glaucoma<br />

specialists<br />

Reinitiate<br />

brimonidine<br />

bid OU. RTC 1<br />

mo<br />

RTC 3 mos with<br />

GLC specialists<br />

08/11 20/20, 20/40 16, 15 “ RTC 3 mos for<br />

HVF/IOP<br />

11/22/11** 20/20, 20/40 18, 35 “ Add PF qid OS,<br />

RTC 2 days<br />

11/24/11** 20/20, 20/40 12, 28 “+PF qid OS RTC 1 week<br />

Date DVA IOP Current ocular meds Plan Additional<br />

01/11/12 20/20,<br />

20/50<br />

02/08/12 20/20,<br />

20/50<br />

03/08/12 20/20,<br />

20/50<br />

04/10/12 20/20,<br />

20/50<br />

4/17/12 20/20,<br />

20/50<br />

05/3/12 20/20,<br />

20/50<br />

14, 20 Cosopt, Brim bid OU Add PF qid x 10 days<br />

OS. Begin<br />

Latanoprost qhs OS.<br />

RTC 10 days<br />

12, 13 Cosopt, Brim bid OU, RTC 4 mos HVF<br />

Latanoprost qhs and PF<br />

tid OS<br />

13, 34 “” without PF OS Add PF qid OS. RTC 1<br />

week<br />

8, 26 Cosopt bid, Brim bid<br />

OU, Latanoprost qhs OS<br />

Add Rimexolone qid<br />

OS, RTC 1 week<br />

11, 15 “” +Rimexolone qid OS RTC for previously<br />

scheduled F/U with<br />

GLC specialists 2‐3<br />

weeks<br />

12, 16 “” RTC 2‐3 mos for HVF.<br />

Still no improvement<br />

of Bell’s Palsy R side.<br />

Dx Pituitary<br />

Microadenoma<br />

Recent onset<br />

Bell’s Palsy R<br />

side<br />

Hold HVF until<br />

Bell’s Palsy<br />

improved R<br />

side.<br />

Failed to<br />

follow up in<br />

GLC clinic.<br />

04/10/2009<br />

Impression:<br />

OD: no glaucomatous<br />

RNFL thinning<br />

OS: severe RNFL<br />

thinning S/I/T and<br />

borderline nasal. Avg<br />

thickness 93 OD, 43<br />

OS<br />

03/24/2011 HVF 24-2<br />

OD: GHT ONL, MD -9.06dB, PSD 10.96dB. Great Reliability<br />

OS: GHT ONL, MD -32.05dB, PSD 1.81dB. Great Reliability<br />

Impression:<br />

OD: Avg thickness 81 (from 93), with mild flattening of curves overall. New borderline<br />

nasal thinning since last<br />

OS: Avg thickness 35 (from 43), overall flattening, severe thinning.<br />

Is Posner Schlossman Syndrome<br />

Benign<br />

• Retrospective review of all patients with PSS seen at Uveitis Clinic of<br />

Singapore National Eye Center: 53 eyes of 50 patients<br />

– Mean age at onset: 35<br />

– 22 Female/28 Male<br />

– Mean duration of disease: 7 years<br />

– No patients had steroids or antiglaucoma tx between attacks<br />

– 14/53 eyes developed glaucomatous damage 2’ to repeated attacks (26.4%)<br />

– 11/14 eyes had normal discs/fields initially, but over a mean of 10 years had<br />

disc/field damage<br />

– Only predictive factor in development of glaucoma is duration of disease<br />

– Risk of glaucoma developing after 10 years of exposure is 2.8x higher than in


*<br />

• 9/14 glaucomatous eyes underwent glaucoma filtering surgery: 1<br />

trabeculectomy with MMC and 8 trabeculectomy with 5-FU<br />

• Mean post op F/U 37 mos, with a mean IOP at last visit of 10mmHg<br />

• 1/9 required glaucoma medications, all of the rest did not<br />

• In the year prior to surgery these 9 eyes had 3-4 iritis attacks each. After<br />

surgery, 6 of these eyes had no further attacks. In the 3 eyes with<br />

further attacks, 2 did not have an increase in IOP, and 1 had 15 attacks<br />

with elevated IOP causing failure of the bleb and progression of<br />

glaucomatous damage.<br />

• PROBLEMS OF STUDY: followed at 6 mo intervals, with instructions<br />

to return earlier if experiencing an attack (reliable pts)<br />

Management<br />

• Treatment doesn’t shorten length of attack<br />

• During an attack inflammation responds well to<br />

topical steroids: prednisolone acetate 1% qid<br />

• IOP control: ocular hypotensive agents<br />

• Careful monitoring of glaucomatous changes with<br />

RNFL OCT and HVF<br />

Possible Treatments<br />

Surgical Options<br />

• Topical Ganciclovir for possible CMV etiology<br />

– Chee et al 10 pts with (+)CMV PSS began oral gancyclovir, oral<br />

valgancyclovir, or intravitreal gancyclovir. All had decrease in attack<br />

frequency and duration of inflammation.<br />

– A follow up study found that systemic gancyclovir for 12 weeks had<br />

cessation of episodes and normalized IOP during treatment in 91%,<br />

topical 64%. But topical had lower recurrence rate (only 57%, vs 80%<br />

systemic)<br />

– Shortcoming of study: PSS recurrence can be separated by months-years.<br />

Treatment success could have been normal time period between<br />

exacerbations<br />

• Not enough evidence to prove efficacy at this time<br />

• Oral or topical NSAID Not enough research<br />

Trabeculectomy Valve/Shunt Implantation<br />

• No study found directly related to valve success in PSS patients<br />

• Stavrou and Murray: 32 eyes with 20 types of uveitis found that 71.9% of eyes had<br />

a reduction in severity of inflammation and the number of relapses after<br />

trabeculectomy<br />

– None of the operations failed as a result of inflammation<br />

– Pattern of uveitis may be related to success rate<br />

– Improved aqueous outflow may allow inflammatory mediators out of the<br />

anterior chamber<br />

●<br />

●<br />

●<br />

●<br />

●<br />

●<br />

In conclusion...<br />

Posner Schlossman Syndrome is a recurrent unilateral mild anterior<br />

uveitis with marked elevation in intraocular pressures.<br />

Management of an acute attack includes ocular hypotensive agents and<br />

topical steroids<br />

Studies have found that 26.4% of PSS patients will develop<br />

glaucomatous changes in the affected eye.<br />

Most important factor in glaucoma risk analysis is duration of the disease<br />

and likely frequency of attacks.<br />

Importance of careful follow up including optic nerve head OCT/VF<br />

Not enough evidence at this point to determine if filtering surgery for<br />

IOP control or topical antivirals to prevent recurrence are viable<br />

treatment options<br />

References<br />

1. Chee, S. Jap, A. Presumed Fuch’s Heterochromic Iridocyclitis and Posner-Schlossman<br />

Syndrome. Comparison of Cytomegalovirus-Positive and Negative Eyes. American<br />

Journal of Ophthalmology. 2008. 883-889<br />

2. DaMata, A. et al.Management of Uveitic Glaucoma with Ahmed Glaucoma Valve<br />

Implantation. Ophthalmology. 106. 1999. 2168-2172.<br />

3. Green, R. Posner Schlossman Syndrome. Clinical and Experimental Optometry. 2007.<br />

53-56<br />

4. Jap, A. et al. Is Posner-Schlossman Syndrome Benign Ophthalmology. 2001. 913-<br />

918.<br />

5. Siveroj, C. et al. <strong>Diagnosis</strong> and Management of Herpetic Anterior Uveitis. 43-47.<br />

6. Takusagawa, H. et al. Infectious Theories of Posner-Schlossman Syndrome.<br />

International Ophthalmology Clinics. 2011. 105-115.<br />

7. Towler, H. et al. Long-term follow up of Trabeculectomy with Intraoperative 5-FU for<br />

Uveitis related Glaucoma. Ophthalmology. 2000. 1822-1828.<br />

8. Stavrou, P. Murray, P. Does trabeculecomy influence the course of uveitis Ocular<br />

Immunology and Inflammation. 1999. 103-108.<br />

Coursebook Page 45 of 139<br />

5


5/29/2012<br />

Learning Objectives<br />

Case Studies in Contact Lens Correction<br />

for Myopic Refractive Error & Myopia Control<br />

Kelvin So, OD<br />

<strong>Pacific</strong> <strong>University</strong> College of Optometry<br />

Review theories of myopia progression and treatment<br />

options<br />

Understand application of gas permeable (GP) and soft<br />

contact lenses (SCL) for myopia correction and control<br />

Review cases of Orthokeratology and Multifocal Soft<br />

Contact Lens correction for myopia<br />

Clinical Pearls for Orthokeratology and Multifocal Soft<br />

Contact Lens fits<br />

Discuss current research in GP and SCL for myopia<br />

control<br />

Myopia Etiology<br />

9.2% of US children<br />

18.5% in Asian Americans<br />

6.6% in African Americans<br />

80% in Taiwan<br />

Theories of Myopia Progression<br />

Near Work<br />

Near-work induced accommodation causes prolate changes<br />

shape of the globe and axial elongation<br />

Support treatment of using progressive addition lenses<br />

Support treatment of inhibiting accommodation or effecting<br />

ocular physiology with the use of cycloplegic agents including<br />

Atropine and Pirenzepine<br />

Ostrow G, Kirkeby L. Update on myopia and myopic progression in children. International Ophthalmology Clinics 2010; 50: 87-93<br />

Waler TW, Mutti DO. The effect of accommodation on ocular shape. Optometry and Vision Science. 2002; 70:424-430.<br />

Smith EL III, Kee C-S. Ramamirtham R, Qiao-Grider Y, Hung L-F. Peripheral vision can influence eye growth and refractive development in<br />

infant monkeys. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2005; 46: 3965-3972.<br />

Theories of Myopia Progression<br />

Peripheral Image Shell Theory<br />

Foveal image has no effect on emmetropization<br />

Animal studies using chicks and infant monkeys have shown<br />

peripheral hyperopic retinal stimulus to cause axial elongation<br />

Support treatment of shifting peripheral image shell in front of<br />

the retina with the use of concentric multifocal optics<br />

Waler TW, Mutti DO. The effect of accommodation on ocular shape. Optometry and Vision Science. 2002; 70:424-430.<br />

Smith EL III, Kee C-S. Ramamirtham R, Qiao-Grider Y, Hung L-F. Peripheral vision can influence eye growth and refractive development in<br />

infant monkeys. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2005; 46: 3965-3972.<br />

Efficacy of Treatment Options<br />

Progressive Addition Lenses<br />

Limited effects in 5 years (COMET Study)<br />

Most significant effects in children with poor accommodation<br />

and esophoric at near (COMET II Study)<br />

Atropine<br />

Toxicity, photophobia, myopia rebound to normal after<br />

treatment cessation<br />

Pirenzepine<br />

Limited follow-up data<br />

Concentric Multifocal Optics<br />

Significant slowing in axial elongation<br />

Gwiazda J, Hyman L, Hussein M, et al. A randomized clinical trial of progressive addition lenses verses single vision lenses on the progression<br />

of myopia in children. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2003; 44: 1492-1500.<br />

Walline JJ, Jones LA, Sinnott LT. Corneal reshaping and myopic progression. Br J Ophthalmol. 2009;93:1181–1185<br />

Tong L, Huang XL, Koh AL, et al. Atropine for the treatment of childhood myopia: effect on myopia progression after cessation of atropine.<br />

Ophthalmology. 2009;116:572–579<br />

Coursebook Page 46 of 139<br />

1


5/29/2012<br />

Concentric Multifocal Optics<br />

Orthokeratology (Ortho-K)<br />

Over-night wear of reverse-geometry GP lens<br />

Hydrodynamic forces compress central corneal epithelial cells,<br />

and create mid-peripheral epithelial cells hyperplasia<br />

Central corneal flattening corrects for myopia by placing image<br />

at fovea while maintaining myopic peripheral image shell<br />

Concentric Multifocal Optics<br />

Orthokeratology (Ortho-K)<br />

Hydrodynamic forces compress central corneal epithelial cells,<br />

and create mid-peripheral epithelial cells hypertrophy<br />

Choo J, Caroline P, et al. Changes in Cat Epithelium Following Overnight Lens Wear with the Paragon CRT Lens for Corneal Reshaping.<br />

Poster presented at <strong>Pacific</strong> Univeristy. Forest Grove, Oregon.<br />

Concentric Multifocal Optics<br />

Orthokeratology (Ortho-K)<br />

Orthokeratology<br />

Effective for mild to moderate myopia correction<br />

Conventional correction up to -6.00D, maximum correction<br />

beyond -10.00D<br />

Pros<br />

No lens wear during waking hours<br />

Durable lens with years of effective use<br />

Parents responsible for handling lenses<br />

Higher safety profile<br />

Cons<br />

Adaptation period<br />

Potential for corneal abrasion<br />

Reduced treatment zone size with higher myopia correction<br />

Forister JFY et al, Prevalence of contact lens-related complications: UCLA contact lens study. Eye Contact Lens 2009 July;35(4):176-180.<br />

Wagner H, et al (CLAY Group), Risk factors for interruption to soft contact lens wear in children and young adults, Optom Vis Sci, Aug<br />

2011;88(8):973-980.<br />

Concentric Multifocal Optics<br />

Multifocal SCL<br />

Daily wear of SCL with center-distance multifocal optics<br />

Focused foveal image with myopic peripheral image shell<br />

Multifocal Soft Contact Lenses<br />

Effective for mild to high myopia correction<br />

Correction from -0.25D to -20.00D with off-the-shelf lenses<br />

Custom multifocal soft lenses available<br />

Pros<br />

Minimal adaptation period<br />

Cons<br />

Patient also needs to learn application and removal<br />

Potential for infection<br />

Potential for variable optics due to lens centration, movement,<br />

and material<br />

Coursebook Page 47 of 139<br />

2


5/29/2012<br />

Orthokeratology<br />

Fitting Process<br />

Corneal topography<br />

Simulated Keratometry readings<br />

Evaulation of corneal astigmatism<br />

Manifest refraction<br />

Most recent spectacle Rx<br />

Best corrected visual acuity<br />

Orthokeratology<br />

Fitting Process<br />

Consult fitting chart for appropriate lens<br />

Order based on sliding rule<br />

Orthokeratology<br />

Fitting Process<br />

Upload topography and manifest refraction data to lens fit<br />

simulator<br />

Adjust lens parameters to optimize fit prior to ordering lenses<br />

Orthokeratology<br />

Fit evaluation<br />

“Bullseye” NaFl pattern<br />

Approximately 0.5mm movement<br />

Vision corrected to best spectacle corrected visual acuity<br />

Dispense lens if all three criteria are met and patient/parent<br />

can successfully apply and remove lens<br />

Orthokeratology<br />

Follow-up<br />

One night follow-up the next morning to evaluate lens fit and<br />

myopia correction<br />

Tangential difference display on topographer to evaulate<br />

centration<br />

“Smiley face” crescent suggest high riding lens<br />

“Frowny face” crecsent suggest low riding lens, often better visual<br />

outcome<br />

Axial difference display on topographer to evaluate correction<br />

Correction over visual axis is key<br />

Followed by one week, one month, then three months followup<br />

schedule.<br />

Evaluate vision and corneal integrity at each appointment<br />

Orthokeratology<br />

Case Study: RF<br />

9 YOAM<br />

Both parents myopic<br />

Approximately 0.50D myopia progression every 6 months<br />

Spectacle correction for myopia<br />

Attempted Ortho-K lens dispense 1/2011, patient unable to<br />

keep lids open for safe lens application and removal<br />

Parents and patient practiced artificial tears instillation at home<br />

RTC 8/2011 to attempt Ortho-K again<br />

MRx:<br />

OD: -6.00-0.50x180 20/20<br />

OS: -6.25-0.75x180 20/20<br />

Coursebook Page 48 of 139<br />

3


5/29/2012<br />

Orthokeratology<br />

Case Study: RF<br />

Topography<br />

Orthokeratology<br />

Case Study: RF<br />

CRT Dual Axis Lens Simulator<br />

Orthokeratology<br />

Case Study: RF<br />

CRT Dual Axis Lens Simulator<br />

Orthokeratology<br />

Case Study: RF<br />

CRT Dual Axis Lens Simulator<br />

Orthokeratology<br />

Case Study: RF<br />

CRT Dual Axis Lens Simulator<br />

Orthokeratology<br />

Case Study: RF<br />

Initial lens ordered and dispensed 9/2011:<br />

OD: Paragon CRT Dual Axis 8.9/550/600/35/11.0<br />

OS: Paragon CRT Dual Axis 8.8/550/600/34/11.0<br />

Slightly high riding lens<br />

Lens rest on lower lid due to tight lid architecture<br />

Expect improved centration with lid closure<br />

Dispensed for over-night wear<br />

Coursebook Page 49 of 139<br />

4


5/29/2012<br />

Orthokeratology<br />

Case Study: RF<br />

One-night follow-up the next morning<br />

Slightly high correction zone (smiley face)<br />

Uncorrected VA 20/50- OU<br />

Good corneal integrity<br />

Orthokeratology<br />

Case Study: RF<br />

One-night follow-up difference display<br />

Continue lens wear for one week<br />

Orthokeratology<br />

Case Study: RF<br />

One-week follow-up<br />

Slightly high correction zone<br />

Uncorrected VA 20/50- OU<br />

Good corneal integrity<br />

Topography shows residual myopia OU<br />

Adjust lens parameters to increase corneal flattening using simulator<br />

Orthokeratology<br />

Case Study: RF<br />

New Parameters ordered and dispensed 10/2011<br />

OD: Paragon CRT Dual Axis 9.1/575/34/600/36/11.0<br />

OS: Paragon CRT Dual Axis 9.0/575/34/600/36/11.0<br />

Flattened Base Curve to increase central corneal flattening<br />

Adjusted individual axis to improve lens centration<br />

Flatten base curve to enhance central corneal flattening<br />

Steepen Landing Zone Angle at one meridian to match steeper<br />

vertical corneal meridian<br />

Orthokeratology<br />

Case Study: RF<br />

Follow-up with flatter base curve dual-axis lenses<br />

Central corneal staining with mild irritation and conj injection OD<br />

Uncorrected VA 20/25 OU<br />

Wider, slightly higher treatment area<br />

Axial difference display reveal residual myopia OS<br />

Orthokeratology<br />

Case Study: RF<br />

Discontinue lens wear<br />

Moxeza ophthalmic solution 1gtt bid x 5 days OD<br />

Nevanac ophthalmic suspension 1 gtt tid x 5 days OD<br />

Consider Multifocal SCL at follow-up<br />

Coursebook Page 50 of 139<br />

5


5/29/2012<br />

Orthokeratology<br />

Case Study: RF<br />

Completely healed corneal abrasion with no scarring on f/u<br />

Parent motivated to continue Ortho-K due to convenience of<br />

no lens wear during waking hours, was educated on corneal<br />

complications due to high myopia, agreed to try SCL.<br />

Multi-focal Soft Lenses<br />

Ordered and dispensed 11/2011<br />

OD: Proclear Multifocal 8.7/-5.50/14.4/+2.50Add/D Lens 20/20<br />

OS: Proclear Multifocal 8.7/-6.00/14.4/+2.50Add/D Lens 20/20<br />

Tangential difference display shows centered treatment zone<br />

Axial difference display shows full myopia correction over<br />

visual axis, with +1.50 D add at pupil margin.<br />

Multi-focal Soft Lenses<br />

Increase Add to reduce peripheral myopia correction:<br />

OD: Proclear Multifocal 8.7/-5.50/14.4/+3.00Add/D Lens 20/20<br />

OS: Proclear Multifocal 8.7/-6.00/14.4/+3.00Add/D Lens 20/20<br />

Multi-focal Soft Lenses<br />

Increase Add to reduce peripheral myopia correction:<br />

OD: Proclear Multifocal 8.7/-5.50/14.4/+3.00Add/D Lens 20/20<br />

OS: Proclear Multifocal 8.7/-6.00/14.4/+3.00Add/D Lens 20/20<br />

Clinical Pearls<br />

Orthokeratology<br />

Practice Makes Perfect<br />

Have patient and parents practice artificial tears instillation to improve lid<br />

manipulation and facilitate corneal de-sensitization prior to fitting.<br />

Sleep It Off<br />

Adaptation takes place rapidly in children, especially in over-night wear.<br />

Take It Step by Step<br />

When correcting high myopia, strive for lens centration first with partial<br />

correction and SCL wear during the day, and progressively increase<br />

corneal flattening to achieve full correction.<br />

Be a Boy Scout (Be Prepared!)<br />

Corneal abrasions do happen, and are easily treated with antibiotic cover,<br />

as well as NSAID to improve comfort and control healing process. Have<br />

these medications ready in-office.<br />

Clinical Pearls<br />

Multi-focal Soft Lenses<br />

Topography over SCLs<br />

Difference map comparing baseline topography and topography over<br />

SCL will show effective power over visual axis, and peripheral add<br />

Angle Lambda<br />

Centered lens on cornea does NOT mean centered optics over visual<br />

axis, perform corneal topography prior to fitting to predict success<br />

Foveal Image Clarity is KEY<br />

If lenses are decentered, it is possible that the foveal image is overplused,<br />

consider adding minus to distance power to achieve optimal<br />

distance vision<br />

High Add<br />

Start with minimum of +2.50 Add, increase to +3.00 Add if needed<br />

Maldonado-Codina et al. Comparative clinical performance of rigid versus soft hyper Dk contact lenses used for continuous wear. Optom Vis<br />

Sci, 2005;82(6):536-548.<br />

Coursebook Page 51 of 139<br />

6


5/29/2012<br />

Research Findings<br />

How Much Add<br />

Peripheral image shell have increasing effectiveness with<br />

increase in add<br />

Ortho-K patients perform best if baseline refractive error is<br />

high<br />

Multi-focal soft lenses allow increase in peripheral add even in<br />

low myopes<br />

Case Study<br />

JS & GS<br />

Twins with low myopia<br />

OD fitted with +2.50D add, OS fitted with +3.00D add<br />

At 1 year follow-up, OD showed myopia progression in both twins<br />

while OS stabilized<br />

Lampa M, So K, et al. Assessing Soft Multifocal Contact Lens Centration with the Aid of Corneal Topography. Poster presented at Global<br />

Specialty Lens Symposium. Las Vegas, NV. 2012.<br />

Research Findings<br />

Aspheric ortho-k lens design<br />

Aspheric back surface to induce more mid-peripheral<br />

steepening compared to conventional design<br />

Attempts to induce higher mid-peripheral myopia to increase<br />

myopia control effectiveness<br />

Traditional OK Design<br />

Base Curve: 8.23 mm 41.00 D.<br />

Research Findings<br />

Aspheric ortho-k lens design<br />

Aspheric back surface to induce more mid-peripheral<br />

steepening compared to conventional design<br />

Attempts to induce higher mid-peripheral myopia to increase<br />

myopia control effectiveness<br />

Traditional OK Design<br />

Base Curve: 8.23 mm 41.00 D.<br />

Aspheric OK Design<br />

Base Curve: 8.23 mm 41.00 D.<br />

Aspheric OK Design<br />

Base Curve: 8.23 mm 41.00 D.<br />

Adjunct Therapies<br />

Time outdoors<br />

Sydney Myopia Study in2008 showed sig reduction in myopia<br />

prevalent in children with more time spent outdoors. Light<br />

intensity may play a larger role when outdoor due to<br />

decreased image blur and increased depth of field.<br />

Low-dose atropine<br />

Compared to 1.0% atropine, 0.1% atropine has been reported<br />

to have similar effects on controlling axial elongation but<br />

without the side effects.<br />

Rose KR, Morgan IG, Ip J, et al. Outdoor activity reduces the prevalence of myopia in children. Ophthalmology. 2008;115:1279–1285.<br />

Cooper J. Using Atropine as A Primary or As An Adjunctive Treatment to Control Myopia. Lecture Presented at Vision by Design 2012<br />

converence . Scottsdale, AZ. 2012.<br />

Closing Remarks<br />

Both ortho-keratology and multifocal soft lenses are non-pharmaceutical<br />

options for myopia control.<br />

Corneal topography is essential in ortho-keratology, and can greatly<br />

enhance multi-focal soft lens fitting.<br />

Ortho-keratology provides convenient vision correction for children<br />

without need for daytime lens wear.<br />

Multi-focal soft lenses can provide additional peripheral add for low<br />

myopes, while research is underway for ortho-k lenses to provide similar<br />

optics.<br />

Myopia controlling optics should be standard of care for myopic patients.<br />

Coursebook Page 52 of 139<br />

7


5/29/2012<br />

References<br />

Cooper J. Using Atropine as A Primary or As An Adjunctive Treatment to Control Myopia. Lecture Presented at Vision by<br />

Design 2012 converence . Scottsdale, AZ. 2012.<br />

Forister JFY et al, Prevalence of contact lens-related complications: UCLA contact lens study. Eye Contact Lens 2009<br />

July;35(4):176-180.<br />

Gwiazda J, Hyman L, Hussein M, et al. A randomized clinical trial of progressive addition lenses verses single vision lenses on<br />

the progression of myopia in children. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2003; 44: 1492-1500.<br />

Hom MM, Bruce AS, Consider lid geometry when fitting RGP lenses, Ocular Surgery News, US Edition, June 1, 2000<br />

Lampa M, So K, et al. Assessing Soft Multifocal Contact Lens Centration with the Aid of Corneal Topography. Global Contact<br />

Lens Symposium, Las Vegas, NV. 2012.<br />

Maldonado-Codina et al. Comparative clinical performance of rigid versus soft hyper Dk contact lenses used for continuous<br />

wear. Optom Vis Sci, 2005;82(6):536-548.<br />

Rose KR, Morgan IG, Ip J, et al. Outdoor activity reduces the prevalence of myopia in children. Ophthalmology.<br />

2008;115:1279–1285.<br />

Siatkowski RM, Cotter SA, Crockett RS, et al. Two-year multicenter, double-masked, placebo-controlled, parallel safety and<br />

efficacy study of 2% pirenzepine ophthalmic gel in children with myopia. Ophthalmology. 2008;12:332–339.<br />

Stapleton F, Keay L, Edwards K et al. The Incidence of Contact Lens-Related Microbial Keratitis in Australia. Ophthalmology.<br />

2008. 115 (10): 1655-62.<br />

Tong L, Huang XL, Koh AL, et al. Atropine for the treatment of childhood myopia: effect on myopia progression after cessation<br />

of atropine. Ophthalmology. 2009;116:572–579.<br />

Tan DTH, Lam DS, Chua WH, et al. One-year multicenter, double-masked, placebocontrolled, parallel safety and efficacy study<br />

of 2% pirenzepine ophthalmic gel in children with myopia. Ophthalmology. 2005;112:84–91.<br />

Wagner H, et al (CLAY Group), Risk factors for interruption to soft contact lens wear in children and young adults, Optom<br />

Vis Sci, Aug 2011;88(8):973-980.<br />

Walline JJ, Jones LA, Sinnott LT. Corneal reshaping and myopic progression. Br J Ophthalmol. 2009;93:1181–1185.<br />

Coursebook Page 53 of 139<br />

8


5/29/2012<br />

OVERVIEW<br />

ENDOTHELIAL CHANGES<br />

ASSOCIATED WITH INTRAOCULAR<br />

LENS SURGERY<br />

Benefits and risks.<br />

Corneal responses.<br />

Specular microscopy as a clinical tool.<br />

Research study: endothelial cell<br />

densities/structure after IOL surgeries.<br />

Future directions.<br />

Alison She, OD<br />

IRIS Ophthalmology Clinic, Langley, BC<br />

Primary Care/Ocular and refractive surgery<br />

INTRAOCULAR LENS IMPLANTS<br />

Benefits:<br />

• Vision.<br />

• Efficiency.<br />

• Clear lens exchange.<br />

Risks:<br />

• Post-op side effects.<br />

• Worst case scenarios.<br />

SIGNIFICANCE OF THE ENDOTHELIUM<br />

Barrier that regulates fluid uptake into cornea.<br />

Transport nutrients into corneal tissue.<br />

Endothelium disruption of cell membrane pumps<br />

affects fluid balance, causing …<br />

• corneal edema,<br />

• haze,<br />

• scarring.<br />

From: Baker Eye Institute<br />

ENDOTHELIAL HEALING<br />

Cornea endothelium does not regenerate well after<br />

damage.<br />

Endothelium self-repairs by existing cells migrating<br />

to fill gaps.<br />

• Perimeter cells around injury site enlarge and move to<br />

fill in damaged areas.<br />

• Cell densities generally decrease with age.<br />

• Natural rate of cell density decrease: 0.5%/year<br />

If the cell density drops too low:<br />

• affects fluid barrier stability.<br />

Coursebook Page 54 of 139<br />

1


5/29/2012<br />

WHAT CAUSES ENDOTHELIAL DAMAGE<br />

DURING SURGERY<br />

Energy from phacoemulsification<br />

Air bubble pressure behind cornea<br />

Turbulence from fluid and lens<br />

fragments during surgery<br />

SURGICAL VARIABLES<br />

VISCOELASTIC SOLUTIONS<br />

More<br />

advanced<br />

cataract<br />

Greater<br />

phaco<br />

energy<br />

Longer<br />

surgical<br />

time<br />

Definition: Protective solution injected into anterior<br />

chamber during cataract surgery.<br />

Purpose:<br />

• Protects endothelium from instruments and<br />

phacoemulsification pressure.<br />

• Maintains anterior chamber depth.<br />

• Opens capsular space to insert IOL.<br />

• Keeps incisions closed when instruments removed from<br />

anterior chamber<br />

Greater<br />

endothelial<br />

loss<br />

Viscoelastic can affect surgical outcome.<br />

PROPERTIES OF DUOVISC ®<br />

PROVISC ® VISCOAT ® KONAN non-contact<br />

SPECULAR MICROSCOPY<br />

specular microscope.<br />

Cohesive<br />

High M.W.<br />

Sodium hyaluronate<br />

Dispersive<br />

Medium M.W.<br />

Sodium hyaluronate +<br />

sodium chondroitin<br />

Parameters measured:<br />

• Cell density<br />

• Cell morphology<br />

Historical significance.<br />

Coursebook Page 55 of 139<br />

2


5/29/2012<br />

SPECULAR MICROSCOPY APPLICATIONS<br />

ENDOTHELIAL CELL COUNT NORMS<br />

Age Average Cell Count (cells/mm 2 )<br />

Diagnose endothelial<br />

dystrophies<br />

Child 3000-4000<br />

20s 2700-3600<br />

30s 2550-3400<br />

Diagnose contact lens<br />

related disorders<br />

40s 2400-3200<br />

50s 2250-3000<br />

60s 2100-2800<br />

70s 1950-2600<br />

Monitor ocular surgery<br />

outcomes<br />

80s 1800-2400<br />

Reference: KONAN microscopy manual FRM-012 Rev. A.<br />

ENDOTHELIUM PROPERTIES<br />

ENDOTHELIUM COMPARISONS<br />

Hexagonality<br />

• Cell shape.<br />

• % cells that are six-sided.<br />

• Normal corneas > 50-60%.<br />

Polymegathism<br />

• Cell size variation.<br />

• Unit of measure: Coefficient of variation (CV).<br />

• Normal range: 0.21-0.33.<br />

1.0 = extremely disrupted cornea.<br />

0 = each cell is precisely identical.<br />

46 year old female 82 year old male<br />

RESEARCH STUDY: CHANGES IN<br />

ENDOTHELIAL CELLS AFTER IOL SURGERY<br />

RESEARCH STUDY<br />

Purpose: evaluate changes in endothelial<br />

cell properties pre & post IOL surgery.<br />

Parameters:<br />

• Cell density.<br />

• Cell hexagonality (shape).<br />

• Cell size variation.<br />

All surgeries at IRIS Ophthalmology<br />

Clinic by same surgeon,<br />

All surgeries used Duovisc ® viscoelastic<br />

solution.<br />

All patients fitted with foldable IOLs.<br />

Coursebook Page 56 of 139<br />

3


5/29/2012<br />

PATIENT SELECTION<br />

Patient age range: 46 to 82 years.<br />

No restrictions on race or gender.<br />

Non-candidates:<br />

• diabetic retinopathy,<br />

• uncontrolled diabetes mellitus,<br />

• diagnosed endothelial dysfunction.<br />

Patient consent for educational photos and data<br />

collection.<br />

METHODS<br />

n=28 eyes of 17 patients.<br />

• 19 eyes with cataract extraction.<br />

• 9 eyes with clear lens exchange.<br />

Specular microscopy taken post-op:<br />

• 1 day.<br />

• 1 week.<br />

• 1 month.<br />

• 3 months.<br />

Cataracts removed via “stop-and-chop”<br />

phacoemulsification.<br />

RESULTS: CELL DENSITIES<br />

3500<br />

CELL DENSITY: PRE-OP TO 3 MONTHS POST-OP<br />

20<br />

15<br />

CELL DENSITY: % CHANGE FROM PRE-OP<br />

CELLS/MM²<br />

3000<br />

2500<br />

2000<br />

1500<br />

1000<br />

PERCENTAGE<br />

10<br />

5<br />

0<br />

-5<br />

-10<br />

-15<br />

-20<br />

-25<br />

500<br />

0<br />

Pre‐op 1d post 1 wk 1 mth 3 mths<br />

TIME AFTER SURGERY<br />

-30<br />

1 day post‐op 1 wk 1mth 3 mths<br />

TIME AFTER SURGERY<br />

HEXAGONALITY OF CELLS<br />

70<br />

PERCENTAGE OF HEXAGONAL CELLS<br />

CELL VARIANCE<br />

0.6<br />

CELL SIZE VARIATION (POLYMEGATHISM)<br />

PERCENTAGE<br />

60<br />

50<br />

40<br />

30<br />

20<br />

10<br />

COEFFICIENT OF VARIATION<br />

0.5<br />

0.4<br />

0.3<br />

0.2<br />

0.1<br />

0<br />

Pre‐op 1 day post‐op 1 wk 1 mth 3 mths<br />

TIME AFTER SURGERY<br />

0<br />

Pre‐op 1 day post‐op 1 wk 1 mth 3 mths<br />

TIME AFTER SURGERY<br />

Coursebook Page 57 of 139<br />

4


5/29/2012<br />

RESEARCH STUDY SUMMARY<br />

Cell density has a larger decrease at 1 day post-op<br />

then gradually recovers over the next 90 days.<br />

High variability at 1 week post op reflects dynamic<br />

nature of endothelium reorganization.<br />

Hexagonality: No statistically significant change pre<br />

vs post surgery long-term.<br />

Polymegathism: No statistically significant change<br />

pre vs post surgery long-term.<br />

FUTURE DIRECTIONS:<br />

PHAKIC IOL SURGERY<br />

Anterior chamber IOL<br />

• AcrySof ® Cachet ® (Alcon)<br />

• Surgical correction for high<br />

refractive errors > 6 D.<br />

Guidelines:<br />

• Specular microscopy at<br />

Pre-op.<br />

6 months post-op.<br />

1 year post-op.<br />

FUTURE RESEARCH DIRECTIONS<br />

Monitor at 1-2 + years post-surgery.<br />

Evaluate systemic factors in endothelial healing:<br />

• Diabetes.<br />

• Inflammatory conditions (arthritis, lupus, etc).<br />

Compare cell loss in:<br />

• Clear lens exchange vs. cataract extraction.<br />

• Long-term monitoring after phakic IOL surgery.<br />

SUMMARY<br />

REFERENCES<br />

Mencucci, R., Ponchietti, C., Virgili, G., Giansanti, F., Menchini, U. “Corneal endothelial damage after cataract surgery:<br />

Microincision versus standard technique.” J Cataract Refract Surg. 2006; 32:1351-1354.<br />

Hengerer, F.H., Dick, H.B., Buchwald, S., Hütz, W.W., Conrad-Hengerer, I. “Evaluation of corneal endothelial cell loss<br />

and corneal thickness after cataract removal with light-adjustable intraocular lens implantation: 12-month follow-up.” J<br />

Cataract Refract Surg. 2011; 37:2095-2100.<br />

Albert, D.M., Jakobiec, F.A. Principles and Practice of Ophthalmology. 1994. W.B. Saunders Company: Philadelphia.<br />

Van den Bruel, A., Gailly, J., Devrieses, S., Welton, N.J., Shortt, A.J., Vrijens, F. The protective effect of ophthalmic<br />

viscoelastic devices on endothelial cell loss during cataract surgery: a meta-analysis using mixed treatment<br />

comparisons. Br J Ophthal. 2011; 95:5-10.<br />

Remington, L. Clinical Anatomy of the Visual System, 2 nd Edition. 2005. Elsevier: Missouri.<br />

Kiss, B., Findl, O., Menapace, R., Petternel, V., Wirtitsch, M., Lorang, T., Gengler, M., Drexler, W. “Corneal endothelial<br />

cell protection with a dispersive viscoelastic material and an irrigating solution during phacoemulsification. Low cost<br />

versus expensive combination.” J Cataract Refract Surg. 2003; 29: 733-740.<br />

Pereira, ACA., Porfirio, F., Freitas, LL., Belfort, R. “Ultrasound energy and endothelial cell loss with stop-and-chop and<br />

nuclear preslice phacoemulsification.” J Cataract Refract Surg. 2006; 32:1661-1666.<br />

Gogate, P., Ambardekar, P., Kulkarni, S., Deshpande, R., Joshi, S., Deshpande, M. “Comparison of endothelial cell<br />

loss after cataract surgery: Phacoemulsification versus manual small-incision cataract surgery. Six week results of a<br />

randomized control trial.” J Cataract Refract Surg. 2010; 36:247-253.<br />

Daly, L., Bourke, J. Interpretation and Uses of Medical Statistics, Fifth Edition. 2000. Blackwell Sciences: UK.<br />

Rainer, G., Stifter, E., Luksch, A., Menapace, R. “Comparison of the effect of Viscoat ® and DuoVisc ® on Postoperative<br />

intraocular pressure after small-incision cataract surgery.” J Cataract Refract Surg. 2008; 34:253-257<br />

Baryanovits, P. “Stabilisation of refraction following cataract surgery.” Br J Ophthal. 1988; 72 815-819<br />

Thomas, Craig. The Specular Microscopy Primer. KONAN Medical.<br />

Kanski, J. Clinical Ophthalmology, 6 th Edition. 2007. Butterworth Heinemann: Toronto.<br />

Duovisc product insert, Alcon.<br />

THANK YOU!<br />

QUESTIONS<br />

Coursebook Page 58 of 139<br />

5


5/29/2012<br />

Objective<br />

• Corneal infections are a common and sight-threatening condition which<br />

can progress very quickly, leading to extensive corneal tissue<br />

destruction and possible perforation.<br />

BIC TRINH O.D<br />

EYECARE ASSOCIATES OF NEVADA<br />

Case Report: Persistent epithelial defect<br />

in post-corneal graft<br />

• Being able to recognize and appropriately treat these conditions is<br />

critical in preserving vision. Today we will review the different etiologies,<br />

appropriate work up and management of different corneal infections.<br />

J.G 57 yo male<br />

Entrance testing<br />

• Patient<br />

◦ 57 Y.O Hispanic Male<br />

◦ Hx of longstanding corneal ulcer, OS<br />

• HPI<br />

◦ (+) mild watery discharge, photophobia, foreign body sensation<br />

◦ No h/o contact lens wear, outdoor activity, trauma<br />

• Gtts<br />

◦ Durezol tid OS x 3 mo<br />

• Oc Hx<br />

◦ Penetrating keratoplasty OS x 20 years<br />

• Medical Hx:<br />

◦ Heart disease<br />

◦ Arthritis<br />

◦ NIDDM<br />

◦ Elevated cholesterol<br />

• VA (sc)<br />

◦ OD 20/30-<br />

◦ OS 20/100+ PH/60<br />

• Tonometry<br />

◦ Deferred<br />

• MR:<br />

◦ OD +2.75-1.00x115 20/20<br />

◦ OS +4.00 DS 20/60<br />

Exam<br />

<strong>Differential</strong> diagnosis<br />

• Anterior segment<br />

◦ OS:<br />

Conjunctiva: 2 + injection<br />

Cornea:<br />

Graft intact<br />

1 mm epithelial defect with surrounding infiltrate, 6:00<br />

60-70% stromal thinning<br />

Diffuse corneal haze<br />

Anterior Chamber<br />

D/ 2+ mixed cell<br />

1 mm hypopyon<br />

Lens<br />

3 +NSC<br />

◦ Bacterial keratitis<br />

Gram (-)<br />

Pseudomonas<br />

Gram (+)<br />

S. Epidermis, S. Aureus,<br />

S. Pneumoniae<br />

◦ Herpetic eye disease<br />

Herpes Simplex Keratitis<br />

◦ Fungal keratitis<br />

Fusarium, Aspergillus,<br />

Candida<br />

◦ Persistent epithelial defect<br />

Toxicity<br />

Autoimmune<br />

Ocular surface disease<br />

◦ Acanthomoeba<br />

Coursebook Page 59 of 139<br />

1


5/29/2012<br />

Impression<br />

1 day follow up<br />

• Impression<br />

◦ Bacterial keratitis vs. Persistent epithelial defect, OS<br />

◦ S/p PKP, OS<br />

• Plan<br />

◦ Culture<br />

◦ D/C Durezol<br />

◦ Fortified vancomycin, fortified tobramycin q1h OS<br />

◦ Erythromycin ung qid OS<br />

◦ F/u 1 day<br />

• HPI: improved pain<br />

• Anterior segment<br />

◦ Cornea<br />

(+) graft edema<br />

1mm ED, 60-70% thinning<br />

Haze improved<br />

◦ Anterior chamber<br />

1+ cell<br />

Hypopyon resolved<br />

• Culture<br />

◦ Gram stain: No organisms observed<br />

◦ Media: No growth<br />

• Impression<br />

◦ Non-healing epithelial defect, OS<br />

◦ Graft failure, OS<br />

• Plan<br />

◦ Vancomycin, Tobramycin q3h OS<br />

◦ Erythromycin ung qid OS<br />

Follow up<br />

Follow up<br />

• 5 day f/u<br />

• 1 week f/u<br />

• 2 week f/u<br />

• 6 week f/u<br />

• Anterior segment<br />

• Anterior segment<br />

• Anterior segment<br />

• Anterior segment<br />

◦ Cornea<br />

◦ Cornea<br />

◦ Cornea<br />

◦ Cornea<br />

0.6mm ED, 50% thinning<br />

◦ Anterior chamber<br />

• Plan<br />

D/Q<br />

◦ Vancomycin, Tobramycin,<br />

Erythromycin ung qid<br />

No ED, 50% thinning<br />

1.5 mm V x 1.2 mm H stromal<br />

opacity<br />

• Plan<br />

◦ D/C Vancomycin, Tobramycin<br />

◦ Erythromycin ung qid OS<br />

◦ Lotemax qid OS<br />

1.5 mm V x 1.2 mm H stromal<br />

opacity, 10% thinning<br />

Microcystic edema<br />

Pachs 777 microns<br />

IOP 13/13<br />

• Plan<br />

◦ PF qid OS<br />

Stromal opacity<br />

Microcystic edema<br />

IOP 14/17<br />

• Plan<br />

◦ Taper PF slowly<br />

◦ Possible repeat graft with<br />

phacoemulsification OS to<br />

improve vision<br />

Persistent epithelial defect<br />

Persistent ED: Causes<br />

• Presentation<br />

◦ Foreign body sensation,<br />

photophobia, corneal<br />

hypoesthesia<br />

◦ Central/paracentral or<br />

inferior/inferonasal<br />

◦ Epithelial defect with heaped<br />

edges<br />

◦ Underlying stromal<br />

inflammation<br />

◦ Resistant to maximum<br />

therapy<br />

Topical agents<br />

Auto-immune<br />

Ocular surface disease<br />

Neurotrophic keratitis<br />

Trauma<br />

Aminoglycosides, trifluoridine,<br />

antimetabolites<br />

Sjogren’s syndrome, RA, graft-versushost<br />

disease<br />

Dry eye, exposure keratopathy, atopy,<br />

rosacea, ocular pemphigoid, mooren’s<br />

ulcer, limbal stem cell deficiency, RCE,<br />

bullous keratopathy<br />

Anesthetic abuse, acanthomoeba<br />

keratitis, HSK, HZO<br />

Underlying foreign body, local<br />

irradiation, contact lens use<br />

Coursebook Page 60 of 139<br />

2


5/29/2012<br />

Management<br />

Management<br />

• Obtain corneal culture<br />

• Cycloplegic agent<br />

• Treatment aimed towards surface healing and preventing stromal melt<br />

◦ Stop/ taper medications toxic to epithelium<br />

◦ Lubrication (non-preserved)<br />

◦ BCL<br />

◦ Orals<br />

Omega-3 FA<br />

Doxycycline<br />

• Poor response to previous therapy<br />

◦ Autologous serum<br />

◦ Oral acyclovir<br />

◦ Systemic evaluation<br />

The use of autologous serum tears in persistent corneal epithelial defects<br />

Eye (2004) 18, 609–614 A L Young, A C O Cheng, H K Ng, L Cheng, G Y S Leung and D S C Lam<br />

Healing within<br />

Current series=10<br />

2 weeks (effective) 6 (60%)<br />

1 month (partially effective) 0 (0%)<br />

>1 month (ineffective) 2 (20%)<br />

Defaulted 2 (20%)<br />

ADEs 0 (0%)<br />

Management<br />

AMT with tarsorraphy<br />

• Surgical options<br />

◦ Punctal occlusion<br />

◦ Total tarsorrhaphy<br />

◦ AMT graft with tarsorraphy<br />

◦ PKP<br />

• Amniotic membrane graft<br />

◦ (Amniograft® 2.5x 2.0 cm) placed in<br />

layers<br />

◦ Larger piece of AM placed (stromal<br />

side down) placed over layers<br />

◦ BCL<br />

◦ Tarsorraphy<br />

• ProKera<br />

• Prospective studies<br />

◦ Lee et al (Bascom Palmer), 1997: AMT<br />

performed in 11 pts with PED. 10 pts<br />

healed in 2-6wks without recurrence for 3-<br />

15 mos<br />

◦ Pachigolla et al (<strong>University</strong> of Texas SW),<br />

2009: 20 eyes with ProKera implant for<br />

avg of 25.3 days. 12 eyes noticed<br />

increase in acuity. 5 eyes noticed PED<br />

with removal of device<br />

Bacterial keratitis<br />

Bacterial keratitis<br />

◦ S. Epidermis, S. Aureus, S.<br />

Pneumoniae<br />

◦ Gram (+) cocci<br />

◦ S. Aereus binds to exposed<br />

components of Bowman’s and<br />

stroma<br />

◦ Pseudomonas aeruginosa<br />

◦ Gram (-) rod<br />

◦ P aeruginosa binds to molecular<br />

receptors on exposed epithelial cells<br />

• Presentation<br />

◦ Pain, decreased vision, redness, suppuration<br />

◦ Sharply demarcated epithelial defect<br />

◦ Stromal edema<br />

◦ A/C reaction<br />

◦ Stromal thinning/necrosis<br />

• Risk factors<br />

◦ Contact lens*<br />

◦ Trauma<br />

◦ Medications<br />

◦ Impaired defense mechanisms<br />

Coursebook Page 61 of 139<br />

3


5/29/2012<br />

Management<br />

Management<br />

• Initial therapy<br />

◦ D/C contact lens<br />

◦ Small (


5/29/2012<br />

Fungal keratitis<br />

Fungal keratitis<br />

• 5-10% of keratitis are fungal in<br />

nature<br />

• More common warmer, humid<br />

climate<br />

• Aspergillus, Candida, and<br />

Fusarium<br />

• Risk Factors<br />

◦ Ocular trauma from plant<br />

◦ Contact lens wear<br />

◦ Immunosuppression<br />

◦ Medications<br />

◦ Penetrating keratoplasty<br />

• Presentation<br />

◦ Gray-white infiltrate<br />

◦ Satellite or branching lesions<br />

◦ A/C reaction<br />

◦ May invade iris or posterior chamber<br />

Fungal keratitis<br />

Acanthamoeba<br />

• Management<br />

◦ Topical:<br />

natamycin 5% suspension: effective against most cases<br />

amphotericin B 0.15%-0.30%<br />

◦ Oral: Effect on keratitis is limited secondary to poor penetration and systemic<br />

side effects<br />

ketoconazole 200-600 mg/day<br />

fluconazole 200-400 mg/day<br />

◦ Typical treatment time is 1 month but can be used for several months<br />

◦ Repeat smears may be necessary<br />

• Protozoa<br />

• Highly resistant<br />

• 70% of cases related to contact lens use<br />

Acanthamoeba<br />

Acanthamoeba<br />

• Presentation<br />

◦ Severe pain, photophobia, decreased vision<br />

◦ Epithelial defect<br />

◦ Ring shaped infiltrate<br />

◦ Keratoneuritis<br />

◦ A/C reaction<br />

• Management<br />

◦ Mechanical debridement<br />

◦ Topical therapy (must be compounded)<br />

Biguanides:<br />

Chlorhexidine gluconate 0.02%(CHG) q1h<br />

Polyhexamethylene biguanide 0.02%(PHMB) (Bacquicil) q1h<br />

Diamidines:<br />

Brolene<br />

Desmodine<br />

Coursebook Page 63 of 139<br />

5


5/29/2012<br />

Microbiology<br />

Microbiology<br />

• When is laboratory evaluation by culture<br />

recommended<br />

◦ Size<br />

◦ Depth<br />

◦ Chronic in nature<br />

◦ Atypical features/ history<br />

• How to obtain sample<br />

◦ Topical anesthetic (proparacaine hydrocholoride)<br />

◦ Scrape material from border as well as base of ulcer<br />

◦ Inoculate onto solid media by streaking rows of C’s<br />

Media/Smear<br />

Culture<br />

Chocolate agar<br />

Most bacteria, Haemophilus,<br />

Neisseria, Moraxella<br />

Blood agar<br />

Most bacteria, yeast, fungi<br />

Sabourad’s agar<br />

Non-nutrient agar<br />

Gram stain<br />

Most fungi, yeast<br />

Acanthamoeba<br />

Bacteria<br />

Pearls<br />

References<br />

• Careful history<br />

◦ Systemic history<br />

◦ Prior ocular history<br />

◦ Medications<br />

• Examination<br />

◦ Documentation of defect<br />

◦ Observe structures around eye<br />

◦ Take notice of unique features<br />

• Treatment<br />

◦ Initiate aggressive therapy<br />

◦ Have complete list of DDx<br />

◦ Remember guidelines for culturing<br />

• Price F.W, Price M.O, Letko E. Curbside Consultation in Cornea and External Disease. Indianapolis,<br />

IN: Slack Incorporated;2010: 119-130.<br />

• Cohen EJ, Rapuano CJ. Bacteria keratitis, fungal keratitis, Acanthamoeba, herpes simplex virus,<br />

herpes zoster virus. In Kunimoto DY, Kanitkar KD, Maker MS, Friedberg MA, Rapuano CJ, eds. The<br />

Wills Eye Manual: Office and Emergency Room <strong>Diagnosis</strong> and Treatment of Eye Disease. 4 th ed.<br />

Philadelphia, PA: Lippencott Williams and Wilkins. 2004:52-65.<br />

• Sutphin JE, Dana MR, Florakis GJ. Basic and Clinical Science Course: External Disease and Cornea.<br />

Singapore; 2007: 113-189.<br />

• KrachmerJH, Mannis M, III. Holland EJ. Cornea: Fundamentals, <strong>Diagnosis</strong> and Management. Vol 1.<br />

China;1997:277-307.<br />

• Pachigolla G, Prasher P, Di Pascuale MA. Evaluation of the role of ProKera in the management of<br />

ocular surface and orbital disorders. Eye Contact Lens. 2009 Jul;35(4):172-5.<br />

• Lee SH, Tseng SC. Amniotic membrane transplantation for persistent epithelial defects with ulceration.<br />

Am J Ophthalmology. 1997 Mar; 123(3):303-12.<br />

• Seitz B, Das S, Saur R. Amniotic membrane transplantation for persistent corneal epithelial defects in<br />

eyes after penetrating keratoplasty. Eye (London). 2009 Apr;23(4):840-8<br />

Coursebook Page 64 of 139<br />

6


5/29/2012<br />

Chief Complaint<br />

Blebitis<br />

• Amy Pedersen, OD<br />

• Portland VA Medical Center<br />

• “Rust colored film over my eye”<br />

– Present for 2 days, stable, (‐)pain and (‐)discharge<br />

– Secondary Complaint<br />

• Mild upper left lid tenderness<br />

• Present for the past 3 days, stable<br />

• Self treating with tobramycin QID x 2 days with no<br />

resolution or decrease in symptoms<br />

Ocular History<br />

– Advanced primary open angle glaucoma OU<br />

– S/P trabeculectomy 1991 OU ( UC Davis), revision for<br />

leak in 1995 at PVAMC OD<br />

– Non‐exudative age related macular degeneration<br />

OS>OD, AREDS category 2<br />

– Diabetes mellitus type 2 with mild non‐proliferative<br />

diabetic retinopathy OS only<br />

– Pseudophakia OU s/p cataract extraction at PVAMC<br />

Medications<br />

– Amlodipine besylate, Aspirin (81mg), Insulin (aspart),<br />

Insulin (glargine), Lisinopril, Metoprolol succinate,<br />

Ranitidine, Simvastatin<br />

– Glaucoma: timolol maleate 0.5% oph soln, 1 gtt OU bid<br />

Medical History<br />

– Diabetes mellitus type 2, diagnosed in 1998 (Last A1C 8.1<br />

on 09/13/11)<br />

– Hypertension<br />

– Hyperlipidemia<br />

– GERD<br />

Pertinent Findings‐ 09/16/11<br />

• Visual Acuity: 20/25 OD, 20/30‐2 (PH: 20/25‐2) OS<br />

• Anterior Segment<br />

– Lids/ Lashes: 1+ MGD OU<br />

– Cornea: temporal incisional scar OU<br />

– Conjunctiva:<br />

• OD: temporal pinguecula, trab scar at 12 o'clock<br />

• OS: 1+ injection, trab scar with partial opacity at 12<br />

o'clock with surrounding 2+ injection<br />

– Cornea: temporal incisional scar OU<br />

– Ant. Chamber: OD: Deep & Quiet, OS: trace cells, (‐)flare<br />

– Iris: Normal OU, (‐)NVI<br />

• GAT @4:31pm OD: 17mmHg OS: 8mmHg (Seidel testing<br />

questioned pinpoint leak)<br />

Coursebook Page 65 of 139<br />

1


5/29/2012<br />

Pertinent Findings Contd…<br />

• Posterior Segment<br />

– Lens: PC IOL OU<br />

– Vitreous: OD: Clear OS: PVD; (‐)VH OU<br />

– Optic disc:<br />

• OD: 0.9/0.9; advanced cupping with 3+ pallor; (‐)NVD<br />

• OS: 0.7/0.7; cupping with 2+ pallor; (‐)NVD<br />

– Macula: scattered pinpoint drusen, trace‐1+ RPE changes ; (‐<br />

)CSME OU<br />

– Vitreous: OD: Clear OS: PVD; (‐)VH OU<br />

– Vessels: Normal OU<br />

– (+)Dot/blot heme OS inferior nasally, (‐)Dot/blot heme OD;<br />

(+)MA's OS inferior nasal to disc, (‐)MAs OU; (‐)Hard Exudates<br />

OU; (‐)CWS OU; (‐)IRMA OU; (‐)VB OU; (‐)NVE OU<br />

– Posterior Pole and Periphery:<br />

• OS: chorodial detachment ora to equator 360, (‐)vit cells<br />

• OD: no rips, holes or tears 360 OU<br />

Assessment/Plan<br />

• Blebitis with choridal detachment OS, reduced pressure OS<br />

• Instill 1gtt Vigamox OS q15min in office immediately as<br />

loading dose<br />

• Admit as inpatient‐ Moxifloxacin 1gtt q1h overnight<br />

• RTC tomorrow morning in Eye Medical Retina<br />

Follow Up #1 (9/17/11)<br />

– Relevant Findings<br />

• Visual Acuity: 20/25‐1 OD, 20/70‐2 (PH: 20/70‐1) OS<br />

• Conjunctiva OS: significant superior 2‐3+ bleb injection, Seidel<br />

positive centrally, purulent appearance<br />

• Ant. Chamber: OS: 1+ cell with trace pigmented cell<br />

• GAT@9:00am OD: 21 mmHg OS: 2 mmHg<br />

• Choroidal detachment 360 degrees OS, (‐)vitreous cell and flare<br />

– Assessment/Plan<br />

• Blebitis OS ‐ appears to be clinically improving, with no evidence<br />

of endopthalmitis.<br />

• Continue Vigamox q1h during daytime, q3h at night; intiate 1gtt<br />

atropine qd OS, timolol 0.5% bid OD only<br />

• RTC 2 days in Eye Medical Retina<br />

Follow Up #2 (9/19/11)<br />

– Chief Complaint: Follow up of blebitis OS. Soreness same as before.<br />

Feels that OS is blurry. Moxifloxacin q1h in daytime, q3‐4 h at night<br />

OS, 1% Atropine qd OS, 0.5% timolol bid OD.<br />

– Relevant Findings<br />

• Visual Acuity: 20/25‐2 OD, 20/150 (PH 20/50‐2) OS<br />

• Cornea: OS mild superior thinning and vascularization near the blebitis, some<br />

Descemets folds, bleb has infiltration in the center, Seidel positive in center of<br />

the bleb, 2+conj injection superiorly<br />

• Anterior Chamber: OS rare cells<br />

• GAT@3:33pm OD: 12 mmHg OS: 0 mmHg<br />

• Posterior Pole & Peripheral Retina: 360 degree choroidal detachment OS<br />

– Assessment/Plan<br />

• Blebitis with leak OS, resolving anterior chamber reaction with hypotony and<br />

choroidal detachment OS<br />

• Cont Moxifloxacin q1h in the day and q3‐4h at night,1% Atropine eye drops OS<br />

qd and 0.5% timolol bid OD<br />

• Will schedule for bleb revision , tomorrow if possible<br />

Bleb Revision Surgery‐ 1 day post‐op<br />

– Relevant Findings<br />

• VA: 20/200 OS; PH not performed<br />

• Superior bleb revision, (‐)Seidel with intact sutures<br />

• GAT@9:45am OS: 23 mmHg with distorted mires<br />

– Assessment/Plan<br />

• One day post bleb revision with patch graft OS‐ good<br />

closure with no leaks, mild ocular HTN today<br />

• Start Pred Forte q2‐3 hours OS and Vigamox QID OS and<br />

Cosopt BID OS, continue timolol bid OD<br />

1 week post‐op (9/26/11)<br />

– Relevant Findings<br />

• VA OD: 20/25‐ OS: 20/50‐2; PH not performed<br />

• Conjunctivia OS‐ Seidel negative with 1 pair of nylon suture<br />

ends that are mildly exposed, all other suture ends are<br />

vicryls<br />

• GAT@9:37am OD: 16 OS: 14<br />

– Assessment/Plan<br />

• One week post bleb revision with patch graft OS, good<br />

closure with no leaks. Nylon suture ends cut at slit lamp.<br />

• Improved IOP with topical Cosopt, taper Pred to QID OS, D/C<br />

Cosopt OS; continue 0.5% timolol bid OD<br />

• RTC 1 week<br />

Coursebook Page 66 of 139<br />

2


5/29/2012<br />

2 week post‐op (10/3/11)<br />

– Relevant Findings<br />

• VA: 20/25 OD, 20/40 OS; PH not performed<br />

• Conjunctivia OS‐ Seidel positive with slow leak along<br />

perilimbal bleb, otherwise intact<br />

• GAT@11:15am OD: 18 mmHg OS: 11 mmHg<br />

– Assessment/Plan<br />

• Bandage Contact Lens OS<br />

• Taper Pred BID OS, restart Vigamox with bandage CL;<br />

continue 0.5% timolol bid OD<br />

• RTC 10/07/11<br />

2.5 week post‐op (10/7/11)<br />

– Relevant Findings<br />

• VA: 20/25‐1 OS<br />

• Conjunctivia OS‐ trace injection of superior conj with<br />

white bled, Seidel negative even with pressure applied<br />

• GAT@2:41pm OS: 18 mmHg<br />

• Choroid attached 360 OS<br />

– Assessment/Plan<br />

• Removed Bandage Contact Lens OS<br />

• Continue Pred Forte BID, D/C Vigmaox OS, start 0.5%<br />

timolol qAM OS; continue 0.5% timolol bid OD<br />

• RTC 2 weeks<br />

1 month post‐op (10/24/11)<br />

– Relevant Findings<br />

• VA: 20/30 OD, 20/50 OS; PH not performed<br />

• Conjunctivia OS‐ trace injection of superior conj with white<br />

bleb, Seidel negative even with pressure applied<br />

• GAT@10:55pm OD: 15mmHg OS: 16 mmHg<br />

– Assessment/Plan<br />

• Post bleb revision with patch graft OS, IOP trending up<br />

though bleb is filtering, currently on 0.5% timolol qAM OS<br />

• 5‐FU subconj OS injection today<br />

• Increase Pred Forte to QID OS, continue 0.5% timolol qAM<br />

OS; continue 0.5% timolol bid OD<br />

• RTC 11/09/11 and PRN<br />

6 week post‐op (11/9/11)<br />

– Relevant Findings<br />

• VA: 20/40 OS; PH not performed<br />

• Conjunctivia OS‐ quiet with nice diffuse bleb, sutures intact,<br />

negative Seidel<br />

• GAT @10:00am OS: 14mmHg<br />

– Assessment/Plan<br />

• Post bleb revision with patch graft OS, good IOP control<br />

(with adjunctive medical therapy‐ patient is on 0.5% timolol<br />

qAM OS); s/p 5 FU on 10/24/11<br />

• 5‐FU subconj OS injection today (2 nd injection)<br />

• Continue Pred Forte to QID OS, discontinue 0.5% timolol<br />

qAM OS to encourage filtration<br />

• RTC 11/28/11 and PRN<br />

9 week post‐op (11/28/11)<br />

– Relevant Findings<br />

• VA: 20/40 OS, PH 20/30+2<br />

• Conjunctivia OS‐ quiet with nice diffuse bleb, sutures<br />

intact, Seidel negative<br />

• GAT@3:17pm OS: 16mmHg<br />

– Assessment/Plan<br />

• Post bleb revision with patch graft OS, good IOP control<br />

WITHOUT glaucoma drops; s/p 5‐FU injection x 2<br />

• 5 FU subconj OS injection today (3 rd injection)<br />

• Continue Pred Forte QID OS<br />

• RTC 3 weeks and PRN.<br />

3 month post‐op (12/19/11)<br />

– Relevant Findings<br />

• VA: 20/40 OD, 20/40 OS; PH: not performed<br />

• Refraction: +0.50 OD (20/25) ‐0.75 OS (20/25) +2.50 add<br />

OU<br />

• Conjunctivia OS‐ nicely elevated scarred bleb OS, Seidel<br />

negative<br />

• GAT@1:25pm OD: 15mmHg OS: 13mmHg<br />

– Assessment/Plan<br />

• Post bleb revision with patch graft OS, good IOP control<br />

WITHOUT glaucoma drops; s/p 5‐FU injection x 3<br />

• Taper Pred Forte TID OS<br />

• Order VA issued bifocal spectacles<br />

• RTC 4 weeks and PRN.<br />

Coursebook Page 67 of 139<br />

3


5/29/2012<br />

4 month post‐op (4/30/12)<br />

<strong>Differential</strong> Diagnoses<br />

– Relevant Findings<br />

• VA: 20/25 OD, 20/25 OS<br />

• Conjunctivia OS‐ nicely elevated scarred bleb OS, Seidel<br />

negative<br />

• GAT@12:35pm OD: 17mmHg OS: 11mmHg<br />

– Assessment/Plan<br />

• Post bleb revision with patch graft OS, good IOP<br />

control; s/p 5 FU injection x 3<br />

• Taper Pred Forte BID OS<br />

• RTC 2 months in glaucoma clinic and PRN<br />

– Blebitis<br />

– Endophthalmitis<br />

– Episcleritis<br />

– Conjunctivitis<br />

– Anterior uveitis<br />

– Ischemic bleb<br />

– Choroidal Detachment<br />

– Retinal Detachment<br />

– Melanoma of ciliary<br />

body<br />

– Melanoma of the<br />

choroid<br />

Presentation<br />

– Serious complication of trabeculectomy that<br />

requires immediate and aggressive treatment<br />

– “White on Red” appearance with white bleb and<br />

surrounding conjunctival hyperemia<br />

– Patients will typically present with mild discomfort<br />

and redness<br />

– May be associated with mild anterior chamber<br />

reaction but no vitritis is present<br />

Risk Factors<br />

• Use of antimetabolites such as mitomycin C and 5‐<br />

fluorouracil in surgery greatly increase the success rate<br />

of the surgery by inhibiting fibroblast proliferation;<br />

however, risk of infection increases because the<br />

procedure is more likely to result in a thin avascular<br />

bleb<br />

• Younger age<br />

• African American race<br />

• Inferiorly placed blebs<br />

• Chronic blepharitis<br />

TRUE EMERGENCY<br />

– Potential Complications‐ hyptonous maculopathy,<br />

choroidal detachment, endophthalmitis<br />

– An infected bleb with severe anterior chamber<br />

reaction with or without hypopyon, vitritis or a<br />

positive vitreous culture is endophthalmitis; signs<br />

and symptoms include severe pain and reduction<br />

of vision, redness and discharge<br />

• If visibility is limited perform a B‐scan ultrasound to<br />

determine the presence of vitiritis<br />

Serous Choroidal Detachment<br />

– Caused by hypotony<br />

– Swelling of the suprachoroidal space limited by<br />

firm attachment of the choroid at the vortex veins<br />

• treat the underlying cause<br />

– Choroid will spontaneously reattach as pressure<br />

increases and stabilizes<br />

– Verhoeff streaks can be present after<br />

reattachment<br />

Coursebook Page 68 of 139<br />

4


5/29/2012<br />

Bleb Revision<br />

– Increased risk of re‐infection after initial blebitis;<br />

significant risk of bleb revision failure<br />

– If leak persists after treating the infection, send for<br />

revision<br />

• Post Bleb Revision Leak<br />

– Bandage contact lens‐ restart topical antibiotics<br />

for prophylactic coverage<br />

Clinical Pearls<br />

• Blebitis is a SERIOUS complication‐ treat immediately and<br />

aggressively to prevent endophthalmitis (admission to hospital is<br />

often indicated)<br />

• Priority #1‐ Treat the Infection before addressing the hypotony: do<br />

not send for an operation until you sterilize the area, otherwise the<br />

infection could worsen<br />

– Many leaks have continuous outflow and very few bacteria can swim<br />

upstream (be more concerned if fluid is moving in and out, consider<br />

monitoring twice a day or hospitalization<br />

• Be a painter‐ Seidel testing with multiple stacked fluorescein strips<br />

• Patient education is critical‐ Instruct patients with blebs to seek<br />

help IMMEDIATELY in the event of any redness, discharge,<br />

decreased vision or photophobia<br />

References<br />

• Ordan JL, Catey B, Melville MM, et al. Risk factors for development of post trabeculectomy<br />

endophthalmitis. Br J Ophthalmol 2000:84:1349‐1353.<br />

• Muckley ED, Lehrer RA. Late‐onset blebitis and endophthalmitis:incidence and outcomes with<br />

mitomycin C. Optom VisSci. 2004;81:499–504.<br />

• Soltau JB, Rothman RF, Budenz DL, Greenfield DS, Feuer W, Liebmann JM, Ritch R. Risk factors for<br />

glaucoma filtering bleb infections. Arch Ophthalmol 2000;118:338‐42.<br />

• Kanski, J. (2006). Clinical ophthalmology: A systemic approach, Sixth edition. New York: Butterworth<br />

Heinemann Elsevier.<br />

• Bartlett, J.D., & Janus,S.D. (2008). Clinical Ocular Pharmacology. St Lousi: Butterworth Heinman<br />

Elsevier.<br />

• Kais, P. K., & Friedman, N.J. (2004). The Massachusetts eye and ear infirmary illustrated manual of<br />

ophthalmology, Second edition. Philadelphia: Saunders.<br />

• Rhee, Douglas J. The fine art of managing blebitis. Review of ophthalmology online. May 2, 2011.<br />

Coursebook Page 69 of 139<br />

5


5/29/2012<br />

Case Presentation<br />

• 83 year old Caucasian male<br />

• Presented for routine exam 9/2011<br />

• ONH asymmetry noted<br />

◦ FDT screening visual field performed<br />

ERIN J. BENDER<br />

NORTHWEST RESIDENTS CONFERENCE<br />

JUNE 4, 2012<br />

My Initial Visit<br />

• Patient asymptomatic to field loss<br />

• Systemic History:<br />

◦ Impaired fasting glucose<br />

• Ocular History:<br />

◦ Past examinations reveal:<br />

No h/o of diabetic retinopathy OU<br />

Early lens changes OU<br />

Presbyopia OU<br />

Examination Results<br />

Posterior Segment<br />

• VA sc OD 20/20-1 OS 20/25-1<br />

• EOMs full and smooth OU<br />

• CF FTFC OU<br />

• Anterior segment remarkable for 1+ NS OU<br />

• IOP OD 15 mmHg OS 15 mmHg<br />

• +APD OS<br />

◦ Pt reports 50% brightness OS compared to OD<br />

OD: Blurred disc margins with elevation,<br />

greatest N<br />

Macula flat and intact<br />

Peripheral retina: scattered hard drusen<br />

and reticular degeneration<br />

OS: Blurred disc margins with elevation,<br />

greatest N, SN and IN<br />

Macula flat and intact<br />

Peripheral retina: scattered hard drusen<br />

and reticular degeneration<br />

Coursebook Page 70 of 139<br />

1


5/29/2012<br />

Is this Papilledema<br />

Did You KNOW<br />

• Papilledema<br />

◦ Increased intracranial pressure<br />

• Pseudopapilledema<br />

◦ Congenital anomalous disc<br />

◦ Peripapillary myelinated NFL<br />

◦ Crowded disc with hypermetropia<br />

◦ OPTIC DISC DRUSEN<br />

• “Druse” is a German word<br />

• It means a crystal-lined hollow space in a rock<br />

• Was widely used in the mining industry in the 16 th<br />

century.<br />

Clinical Presentation: Optic Disc Drusen<br />

• Blurred disc margins<br />

• Scalloped disc borders<br />

• NO obscuration of surrounding vasculature<br />

• Non-hyperemic disc, no dilated capillaries<br />

• Multi-lobulated refractile bodies (if visible)<br />

• Trifurcations of the blood vessels<br />

• No elevation to surrounding NFL<br />

Incidence<br />

Demographic Presentation<br />

• ~1% of general population<br />

• Increases to ~3.4% in patients with relatives of the<br />

same diagnosis<br />

• Questionable AD inheritance pattern, described as<br />

“irregular dominant fashion”<br />

• 75 to 85% BILATERAL presentation<br />

• Equality in sex distribution<br />

• Caucasians higher incidence<br />

◦ Theory: African Americans tend to have larger scleral canal<br />

sizes as compared to Caucasians<br />

Coursebook Page 71 of 139<br />

2


5/29/2012<br />

Histology<br />

Pathophysiology<br />

• Acellular<br />

◦ Mucopolysaccharides<br />

◦ Amino acids<br />

◦ Ribonucleic and desoxyribonucleic acid<br />

◦ Calcium<br />

◦ Small amounts of iron<br />

• Range from 5 to 1000 microns in diameter<br />

• Deposits anterior to the lamina cribrosa, in 90%<br />

behind the level of Bruch’s membrane<br />

3 THEORIES OF FORMATION OF ODD<br />

Congenital Dysplasia of the optic nerve head<br />

and blood supply<br />

Axoplasmic stasis secondary to crowded disc<br />

Small scleral canal size<br />

Or an amalgamation<br />

Tso’s Theory<br />

Development and Progression<br />

Theory: ABNORMAL<br />

AXONAL METABOLISM<br />

LEADING TO<br />

INTRACELLULAR<br />

MITOCHONDRIAL<br />

CALCIFICATION<br />

Axonal rupture<br />

Mitochondrial extrusion<br />

into extracellular space<br />

Calcium continues to<br />

deposit into extracellular<br />

mitochondria<br />

(Ca2+ concentration<br />

higher than within cell)<br />

Small calcified<br />

microbodies produced<br />

Calcium continue to be<br />

deposited on the surface,<br />

forming drusen<br />

• Labeled as “buried” in young children and adults.<br />

Visibility increases with age secondary to axonal<br />

atrophy and continuing calcium deposition.<br />

• Tend to present or become “unburied” on INFERIOR<br />

NASAL portion of ONH.<br />

• 75% of ODD patients will develop some form of<br />

visual field loss.<br />

• Visual acuity tends to be well preserved.<br />

End Stage<br />

Associated Conditions<br />

• Gradual worsening and compromise to vasculature<br />

and nerve fiber layer can result in:<br />

◦ Anterior Ischemic Optic Neuropathy<br />

Related to mechanical forces<br />

Patients tend to be in mid 20s or younger<br />

Without systemic cardiovascular disease<br />

◦ Compressive CRVO/CRAO<br />

Secondary to impairment of blood flow<br />

◦ Juxtapapillary Choroidal Neovascularization<br />

Secondary to chronic ischemia<br />

• Pseudoxanthoma elasticum<br />

◦ Range from 1.4 to 3.6% association with ODD<br />

◦ Elastin lines the insertion of lamina cribrosa<br />

◦ Abnormal accumulation of polyanions with high calcium<br />

affinity acts as triggering factor for mineralization<br />

• Angioid streaks<br />

◦ Theory that a common defect of abnormal mineralization<br />

predisposes for ODD and angioid streaks<br />

• Retinitis Pigmentosa<br />

◦ Range from 0 to 10% association with ODD<br />

◦ Deposits often found ADJACENT to normal sized disc<br />

Coursebook Page 72 of 139<br />

3


5/29/2012<br />

Diagnostic Testing<br />

Our Case: Visual Field 24-2<br />

• Visual Field<br />

◦ Typically arcuate defects on VF<br />

◦ Enlarged blind spot (less common)<br />

◦ Visible drusen tend to show higher mean deviation<br />

◦ Patients tend to be unaware of visual field defect<br />

VF defects do NOT have direct correlation<br />

with location of drusen!!<br />

Diagnostic Testing<br />

Our Case: Auto fluorescent Photos<br />

• Fluorescein Angiography<br />

◦ Faint diffuse hyper fluorescence of ONH early with late well<br />

defined hyper fluoresce without leakage<br />

OD<br />

OS<br />

• Auto fluorescent Photography<br />

◦ Hyper-reflective lesions within the ONH on photo<br />

◦ Are NOT bi-refringent<br />

◦ Higher sensitivity for detecting buried drusen than<br />

ophthalmoscopy but lower than Bscan<br />

Diagnostic Testing<br />

• Optical Coherence Tomography<br />

◦ Monitor NFL loss<br />

◦ Eyes with buried disc drusen often do NOT show NFL loss<br />

◦ Reveals irregular and discontinuous elevations at ONH<br />

◦ Rounded HYPO-reflectant appearance<br />

• B-scan ultrasonography<br />

◦ STANDARD OF CARE<br />

◦ Hyper reflectance at ONH that persists at low gain settings.<br />

Coursebook Page 73 of 139<br />

4


5/29/2012<br />

OUR CASE:<br />

OCT<br />

FINDINGS<br />

OD and OS elevated<br />

NRR thickness<br />

Sup and Inf NFL<br />

loss OS<br />

Diagnostic Testing<br />

• Optical Coherence Tomography<br />

◦ Monitor NFL loss<br />

◦ Eyes with buried disc drusen often do NOT show NFL loss<br />

◦ Reveals irregular and discontinuous elevations at ONH<br />

◦ Rounded HYPO reflectant appearance<br />

• B-scan ultrasonography<br />

◦ STANDARD OF CARE<br />

◦ Hyper fluorescence at ONH that persists at low gain settings<br />

Our Case: Bscan<br />

OS Bscan at Low Gain<br />

OD at medium gain<br />

OS at medium gain<br />

Treatment<br />

Papilledema versus Pseudopapilledema<br />

• Most cases managed with serial VF testing, IOP<br />

monitoring and NFL analysis.<br />

• No definitive treatment. Not all cases are treated.<br />

• Intraocular pressure lowering agents may be used<br />

with goal of protecting the remaining NFL.<br />

◦ If due to mechanical compression, lowering IOP may alleviate<br />

the process.<br />

◦ Blood flow to ONH may be improved with use of antihypertensives,<br />

potentially reducing chance of vascular events.<br />

• Save healthcare dollars: Diagnostic testing is<br />

expensive and sometimes unnecessary.<br />

• Unduly stress for the patient: Reassurance against<br />

potential morbid outcome.<br />

Coursebook Page 74 of 139<br />

5


5/29/2012<br />

MRI<br />

To scan or not to scan<br />

$$$$$$<br />

36 YO WF referral with “asymptomatic<br />

bilateral disc edema”.<br />

Remote h/o HA and previous work-up.<br />

Past imaging revealed pineal cyst.<br />

Visual Field Results<br />

Fundus Exam<br />

Bscan Results<br />

Bumps in the Nerve<br />

OD: at high and low gains<br />

OS: at high and low gains<br />

• What is the true mechanism<br />

◦ Is scleral size really a risk factor<br />

• What are the genetics<br />

• Is IOP lowering truly beneficial<br />

• Is there an unknown modifiable risk<br />

• Research opportunities abound…<br />

Coursebook Page 75 of 139<br />

6


5/29/2012<br />

TAKE HOME POINTS<br />

References<br />

• Visual field defects common<br />

◦ Often do NOT correlate with ODD location<br />

• B – scan is standard of care<br />

◦ Consider prior to imaging studies<br />

• AF photography<br />

• OCT role TBD<br />

◦ May help in differentiating NFL defects in ODD versus<br />

glaucoma<br />

◦ Perhaps useful to monitor progression<br />

1. Grippo, T. Rogers, S. Optic Disc Drusen. Glaucoma Today. 19-24. Jan/Feb 2012.<br />

2. Antcliff, R. Spalton, D. Are Optic Disc Drusen Inherited Ophthalmology 106: 1278-1281. 1999.<br />

3. Floyd, M. Katz, B. Measurement of Scleral Canal Using Optical Coherence Tomography in patients with Optic<br />

Disc Drusen. Ophthalmology 139: 664-669. 2005.<br />

4. Miller, Newman. Pseudopapilledema associated with Optic Disc Drusen. Clinical Neuro-ophthalmology. 6 th<br />

edition, volume 1. 178-187. 2005.<br />

5. Auw-Haedrick, C. Stauback, F. Optic Disc Drusen. Survey of Ophthalmology. 47: 515-532. Nov/Dec 2002.<br />

6. Golnik, C. Congenital anomalies and acquired abnormalities of the optic nerve. Up to Date. 8/2011.<br />

7. Bienfang, D. Overview and <strong>Differential</strong> diagnosis of papilledema. Up to Date. 6/2010.<br />

8. Slotnik, S. Sherman, J. Buried Disc Drusen Have Hyporeflective Appearance on Spectral Domain Optical<br />

Coherence Tomography. Optometry and Vision Science 89:5. May 2012.<br />

9. Murthy, R. Storm, L. In-vivo high resolution imaging of optic nerve head drusen using spectral domain optical<br />

coherence tomography. BMC Medical Imaging 10:11. 2010.<br />

10. Wilkins, J. Pomeranz, H. Visual Manifestations of Visible and Buried Optic Disc Drusen. Journal of Neuroophthalmology<br />

24. Nov 2004.<br />

11. Katz, B. Pomeranz, H. Visual field Defects and Retinal Nerve Fiber Layer Defects in Eyes with Buried Optic<br />

Nerve Drusen. American Journal of Ophthalmology: 141: 248-253. 2006.<br />

12. Tatlipinar, S. Bozkurt, B. Polarimetric Nerve Fiber Analysis in Patients with Visible Optic Nerve Head Drusen.<br />

Journal of Neuro-ophthalmology: 21: 245-249. 2001.<br />

13. Ocakoglu, O. The investigation of Retinal Nerve Fiber layer thickness in eye with optic nerve head drusen.<br />

Neuro-ophthalmology: 28: 205-214. 2004.<br />

14. Kawa, P. Nowomiejska, K. Glaucoma and Drusen of the Optic Nerve Head. Neuro-ophthalmology: 33: 77-83.<br />

2009.<br />

15. Thurtell, M. Biousse, V. Optic Nerve Head Drusen in Black Patients. Journal of Neuro-ophthalmology: 0: 1-4.<br />

2011.<br />

Coursebook Page 76 of 139<br />

7


5/29/2012<br />

Exam of H.T.<br />

Allison Coit<br />

Spokane VA Resident<br />

June 2012<br />

• Chief Concern:<br />

• Dozed off Friday afternoon and woke himself up when<br />

he jammed his thumb in his right eye<br />

• After incident noticed flash of light and snowstorm of<br />

black floaters<br />

• (‐)curtain over vision<br />

• No new flashes since initial incident<br />

• Immediately after poking eye, flushed eye out with<br />

water<br />

Exam…<br />

**S/p Cataract Extraction/PCIOL OD 2 weeks ago<br />

• DVA: w/o specs<br />

• OD: 20/400‐<br />

• OS: 20/50+<br />

• Pupils: PERRL, (‐)APD<br />

• EOMS: FULL<br />

• CT: No Tropia<br />

• CF: FTFC<br />

• Anterior Segment:<br />

• Lids: Clr OU<br />

• Conj:<br />

• OD: 2+ hyperemia<br />

• OS: Clr<br />

• Cornea: Clr OU<br />

• AC:<br />

• OD: 3+ pigment/cell<br />

• OS: D/Q<br />

• Iris: Flat OU<br />

• Lens:<br />

• OD: PCIOL – clear/centered<br />

• OS: 1+ NS, Tr PSC inferior to visual Axis<br />

Posterior Segment OD<br />

• Vitreous: Dense<br />

Hemorrhage<br />

• C/D: 0.15 , distinct margins<br />

• Macula: Flat<br />

• Posterior Pole:<br />

unremarkable<br />

• A/V: 2/3<br />

• Periphery: Flat<br />

Assessment/Plan<br />

Retina Evaluation<br />

• Assessment:<br />

• Vitreous Hemorrhage OD<br />

• Possible Retinal Detachment<br />

• B‐scan not working so unable to confirm<br />

• Rebound Inflammation OD<br />

• Plan:<br />

• Refer to Retina Specialist<br />

• Rx:<br />

• Scopolamine 1gtt qpm OD and qAM tomorrow OD<br />

• Prednisolone Acetate Q2hr OD only<br />

• DVA: w/o specs<br />

• OD: 5/100<br />

• Pupils: (+)APD<br />

• EOMS: FULL<br />

• CT: No Tropia<br />

• CF: FTFC<br />

• Anterior Segment (OD )<br />

• Lids: ClR<br />

• Conj: Clr<br />

• Cornea: Clr<br />

• AC: 2‐3+ cell<br />

• Iris: Flat<br />

• Lens: PCIOL – clear/centered<br />

• Gonio:<br />

• Small hypopyon<br />

Coursebook Page 77 of 139<br />

1


5/29/2012<br />

Retina Evaluation…<br />

• Posterior Segment ‐<br />

OD only<br />

• Vitreous Hemorrhage<br />

• Vitreous: 3+ vitritis, 3‐4+<br />

vitreous haze, clumps of<br />

vitreous cells and a “string<br />

of pearls”<br />

• Retina: break at 11 o’clock<br />

No Case of No Cataract<br />

Surgeries Years Rate per 1000 Surgeries<br />

Author Country Data Source Endophthalmitis<br />

West et al United States Medicare, US 1026 447,627 1994‐2001 2.15<br />

Taban et al United Kingdom Meta‐analysis >3,000,000 1963‐2003 1.28<br />

Kamalaraajah et al United Kingdom<br />

Estimations from<br />

databases &<br />

questionnaires ~230,000 1999‐2000 1.4<br />

Admin and clinical<br />

Li et al<br />

Australia<br />

databases 210 117,083 1980‐2000 1.79<br />

Admin and clinical<br />

databases 102 57,123 1995‐2000 1.79<br />

Ng et al<br />

Australia<br />

National cataract<br />

registry 112 118,151 1999‐2001 0.6<br />

Wejde et al<br />

Sweden<br />

National cataract<br />

registry 109 225,471 2002‐2004 0.48<br />

Lundstrom et al Sweden<br />

Krummenauer et al Germany Questionnaire 291 404,356 2000 0.72<br />

Moshirfar et al United States 14 20,013 2003‐2005 0.7<br />

Bascom Palmer 1984‐1989 0.7<br />

Bascom Palmer 1990‐1994 0.9<br />

Bascom Palmer 1995‐1999 0.6<br />

Miller et al<br />

Clear Corneal<br />

Incision 6 15, 920 2000‐2004 0.5<br />

other methods 1 0.2<br />

Risk Factors<br />

• Pre‐Operative<br />

• Blepharitis/Conjunctivitis<br />

• Lacrimal Duct Obstruction<br />

• Contact Lens Wear<br />

• Ocular prosthesis in fellow<br />

orbit<br />

• Male>Female<br />

• >85 years old (2 nd risk group<br />

was 20‐64 years)<br />

• Diabetes<br />

• Immunosuppression<br />

• Upper Respiratory Infection<br />

• Intraoperative<br />

• Capsular Rupture<br />

• Secondary IOL<br />

• Inadequate eyelid/conjunctival<br />

disinfection<br />

• Prolonged surgery (>60min)<br />

• Vitreous loss<br />

• Prolene haptic IOLs<br />

• Postoperative<br />

• Wound leak/dehiscence<br />

• Inadequate buried sutures<br />

• Suture removal<br />

• Presence of filtering bleb<br />

Decreased Vision<br />

(+)APD<br />

Loss of red reflex<br />

Corneal Infiltrate<br />

Wound abnormality<br />

Hypopyon<br />

Pain<br />

Corneal Edema<br />

Fibrinoid AC response<br />

Vitreous Inflam<br />

Retinitis<br />

Keratic precipitates<br />

• External Signs<br />

• Ciliary injection<br />

• Chemosis<br />

• Eyelid edema<br />

• Orbital Infection<br />

• Restriction of EOMs<br />

• Proptosis<br />

Delayed Clinical Signs/Symptoms<br />

• Capsular plaques (89%)<br />

• White plaque on posterior capsules<br />

• Fungal or bacterial<br />

• Keratic precipitates (81%)<br />

• Hypopyon (31%)<br />

• Small, do gonio<br />

• Low grade uveitis (may initially respond to steroids)<br />

• Granulomatous<br />

• Vitritis<br />

• Beaded fibrin strand in aqueous<br />

• White “string of pearls” infiltrate in vitreous or aqueous<br />

• fungal<br />

• No pain initially (27%)<br />

Coursebook Page 78 of 139<br />

2


5/29/2012<br />

• Immediate (withinin 2 days of surgery)<br />

Could be any organism!<br />

• Pseudomonas** Streptococcus**<br />

• Early (214 days after surgery)<br />

Could be any organism!<br />

Top Suspects:<br />

•Staphylococcus (coagulase negative) &<br />

•Staphylococcus aureus<br />

**most virulent<br />

<strong>Differential</strong> <strong>Diagnosis</strong><br />

• Delayed (>14 days after surgery)<br />

• Most common:<br />

• Staphylococcus<br />

• Propionibacterium acnes<br />

• Fungi<br />

• Ex: Candida, Aspergillus<br />

• Immediate<br />

• Toxic Anterior Segment Syndrome<br />

• Clinical Findings:<br />

• Fibrin formation<br />

• Corneal Edema<br />

• Anterior Chamber inflammation<br />

• Mid‐dilated and irregular pupil<br />

• Low IOP<br />

• Vs Endophthalmitis<br />

• Usually less prominent redness<br />

• Less pain<br />

• Less severe anterior chamber reaction<br />

• Little or no vitreous inflammation<br />

<strong>Differential</strong> <strong>Diagnosis</strong><br />

• Early (2 14 days)<br />

• Retained Lens Material<br />

• Increased inflammation with time<br />

• Amount of retained lens + amount of time in eye<br />

• Perform gonio<br />

<strong>Differential</strong> <strong>Diagnosis</strong><br />

• Early<br />

• Proliferative Diabetic Retinopathy<br />

• PDR greater disturbance of blood aqueous barrier<br />

• History of Uveitis<br />

• Greatest risk of excessive post‐op inflam and complications<br />

when uveitis not under control<br />

• Most specialists require 6 months of inflamm control<br />

• Increased risk: HLA‐B27 uveities, sarcoidosis, granulomatous<br />

uveitis, children<br />

Coursebook Page 79 of 139<br />

3


5/29/2012<br />

Treatment<br />

• Intravitreal<br />

• Ceftazidime (gram ‐, including P. aeruginosa and H. influenzae)<br />

• 2.25mg in 0.1ml<br />

• Vancomycin (gram +, including MRSA)<br />

• 1.0mg in 0.1mL<br />

• Subconjunctival<br />

• Vancomycin<br />

• 25mg in 0.5mL<br />

• Ceftazidime<br />

• 100mg in 0.5mL<br />

• Steroids<br />

Topical<br />

Vancomycin<br />

50mg in 1.0mL<br />

Ceftazidime<br />

100mg in 1.0mL<br />

• Oral prednisolone 1mg/kg po Qam x 3‐5 days<br />

• Intravitreal dexamethasone<br />

• Topical Pred Acetate 1% q1‐2 hours<br />

Vitrectomy<br />

Goal:<br />

Removing the infecting organisms and toxins<br />

Removing vitreous membranes<br />

Which could lead to retinal detachments<br />

Improve distribution of antibiotics<br />

Cons:<br />

Increase drug toxicity<br />

Endophthalmitis Vitrectomy<br />

Treatment Study (EVS)<br />

• 420 patients<br />

• Endophthalmitis within 6 weeks of cataract surgery<br />

or secondary IOL<br />

• Results<br />

• Systemic antibiotics made no difference in final visual<br />

acuity<br />

• VA of Hand Motion or better<br />

• Vitrectomy made no difference in outcome<br />

• VA of Light Perception only<br />

• Improved outcome with immediate vitrectomy<br />

Prophylaxis<br />

• 5% Povidone Iodine<br />

• Significantly decreases the risk<br />

• Effective against bacteria, fungi, virus, protozoa, and<br />

spores<br />

• Surgeons place 1gtt of Betadine in eye at surgery<br />

• Pre‐op Antibiotics<br />

• Limit pre‐op drops to 1‐3 days to decrease risk of antibiotic<br />

resistance<br />

• Post‐op Subconj Antibiotics<br />

• Inconclusive<br />

• Not always effective because of sub‐therapeutic<br />

intraocular concentration<br />

Special Thanks to:<br />

Thomas Riley, OD, FAAO<br />

References<br />

1. Doshi, Rishi R., J. Fernando Arevalo, Harry W. Flynn, and Emmett T. Cunningham, Jr. "Evaluating<br />

Exaggerated, Prolonged, or Delayed Postoperative Intraocular Inflammation." American Journal of<br />

Ophthalmology 150 (2010): 295‐304. Print.<br />

2. Endophthalmitis Vitrectomy Treatment Group, comp. "Results of the Endophthalmitis Vitrectomy Study."<br />

Arch Ophthalmology 113 (1995): 1479‐496. Print.<br />

3. Hatch, Wendy V., Geta Cernat, David Wong, Robert Devenyi, and Chaim M. Bell. "Risk Factors for Acute<br />

Endophthalmitis after Cataract Surgery: A Population‐based Study." Ophthalmology 116.3 (2009): 425‐30.<br />

Print.<br />

4. Kresloff, Michael S., Alessandro A. Castellarin, and Marco A. Zarbin. "Endophthalmitis." Survey of<br />

Ophthalmitis 43.3 (1998): 193‐224. Print.<br />

5. Lalwani, Geeta A., Harry W. Flynn Jr, Ingrid U. Scott, Carolyn M. Quinn, Audina M. Berrocal, Janet L. Davis,<br />

Timothy G. Murray, William E. Smiddy, and Darlene Miller. "Acute‐Onset Endophthalmitis after Clear<br />

Corneal Cataract Surgery (1996–2005)Clinical Features, Causative Organisms, and Visual Acuity<br />

Outcomes." Ophthalmology 115.3 (2008): 473‐76. Print.<br />

6. Moshirfar, M., V. Feiz, A. Vitale, J. Wegelin, S. Basavanthappa, and D. Wolsey. "Endophthalmitis after<br />

Uncomplicated Cataract Surgery with the Use of Fourth‐Generation FluoroquinolonesA Retrospective<br />

Observational Case Series." Ophthalmology 114.4 (2007): 686‐91. Print.<br />

7. Scott, I., H. Flynnjr, W. Smiddy, J. Newton, and D. Miller. "Acute‐onset Endophthalmitis After Cataract<br />

Surgery (2000–2004): Incidence, Clinical Settings, and Visual Acuity Outcomes After Treatment." American<br />

Journal of Ophthalmology 139.6 (2005): 983‐87. Print.<br />

Coursebook Page 80 of 139<br />

4


5/29/2012<br />

Case History<br />

VALSALVA RETINOPATHY<br />

Kendra Kallemeyn, OD<br />

Roseburg, OR VAMC<br />

65yowm presents with CC of “black spot blocking<br />

the vision in right eye. “<br />

Onset – sudden, 5 days ago<br />

Activity during time of onset – was helping daughter<br />

move an entertainment center the night before and<br />

when he woke up in the middle of the night he could not<br />

see out of his right eye<br />

Change in vision does not appear to be worsening or<br />

improving since time of onset.<br />

No symptoms like this have been noted previously in<br />

either eye.<br />

Ocular History<br />

(-) prior ocular disease, injury or surgery<br />

LEE 4-5yrs ago at commercial practice<br />

Patient’s wife reports he was told to get his blood<br />

pressure checked, because “something is wrong with the<br />

blood vessels in the eye(s).”<br />

No follow-up appointment with PCP was made<br />

Medical History<br />

No prior healthcare with any VA system prior to<br />

today<br />

Medications<br />

Unknown blood pressure medication<br />

started by outside provider in ~2009<br />

patient reports medication is NOT controlling BP<br />

NKDA<br />

Baseline Exam 11/1/11<br />

Visual Acuities cc<br />

OD: CF w/EF PHNI<br />

OS: 20/40 PHNI<br />

Pupils: equal, round, reactive to light, (+)APD OD<br />

EOMs: full and smooth OU<br />

Confrontation Fields: full to finger counting OU<br />

Anterior Seg: unremarkable OU<br />

Tonometry by GAT: 16/16 @ 1:21pm<br />

BP recorded as 174/99 at check-in to ER<br />

Coursebook Page 81 of 139<br />

1


5/29/2012<br />

Baseline Exam Continued…<br />

OD<br />

Posterior Segment<br />

Lens: trace nuclear sclerosis OU<br />

Vitreous: clear OU<br />

C/D Ratio : 0.65/0.65 OD, 0.5/0.5 OS<br />

Vessels: arterial attenuation OU, A/V crossing changes OS<br />

Macula<br />

• OD: 5DDx5DD subretinal and intraretinal hemorrhage<br />

w/preretinal heme inferior<br />

• OS: flat, mild RPE changes, (-)heme/MA<br />

Periphery: intact 360 OU<br />

SUBRETINAL<br />

--green/gray<br />

INTRARETINAL<br />

--dark red<br />

PRERETINAL<br />

(Subhyaloid or sub-ILM)<br />

--boat shape or<br />

horizontal blood line<br />

OS<br />

Assessment/Plan<br />

--arterial attenuation with<br />

no retinal hemorrhages<br />

Assessment<br />

Subretinal hemorrhage OD<br />

Plan<br />

Refer for retinal consult; Portland VA Ophthalmology<br />

<strong>Differential</strong> <strong>Diagnosis</strong><br />

<br />

<br />

Primary <strong>Diagnosis</strong><br />

Valsalva retinopathy<br />

Secondary <strong>Diagnosis</strong><br />

Retinal Artery Macroaneurysm<br />

Terson’s Syndrome<br />

Trauma – Choroidal Rupture<br />

High Altitude Retinopathy<br />

Neovascular Macular Degeneration – CNV<br />

Retinopathy in Blood Disorders<br />

Purtscher Retinopathy<br />

Hypertensive retinopathy<br />

Diabetic retinopathy<br />

Choroidal Melanoma<br />

http://www.sightnation.com/eye-disorders/otherpage=3<br />

http://www.nature.com/eye/journal/v20/n9/fig_tab/6702068f6.html#figure-title<br />

Retinal Artery Macroaneurysm (hemorrhage)<br />

• Aneurysmal dilation of arteriole, most commonly at bifurcation or A/V crossing, along temporal arcades<br />

and is associated with multilayer retinal hemorrhage in 50% of cases.<br />

• Hard exudates may also be present due to chronic leakage<br />

• Most commonly seen with unilateral presentation in hypertensive, elderly women.<br />

•Preretinal and vitreous hemorrhage may block underlying lesion and/or make FA difficult which can<br />

result in misdiagnosis.<br />

Coursebook Page 82 of 139<br />

2


5/29/2012<br />

http://savesightcentre.com/diagnostic-testing.html<br />

http://www.sarawakeyecare.com/Atlasofophthalmology/posteriorsegment/posteriorsegmentpictur5tersonsyndrome.htm<br />

http://www.revoptom.com<br />

Terson’s Syndrome<br />

• Intraocular hemorrhage (typically bilateral) associated with acute intracranial hemorrhage<br />

• Most common cause – subarachnoid bleeding from aneurysm of the anterior communicating artery<br />

• Mechanism -- increased intracranial pressure at the time of an acute intracranial bleed may lead to<br />

acute obstruction of the retinal venous circulation which results in rupture of superficial retinal vessels<br />

• Patient typically presents to ER Physician with significant systemic signs/symptoms after suffering a<br />

spontaneous or trauma-induced subarachnoid hemorrhage<br />

Trauma: Choroidal Rupture<br />

• Involves the choroid, Bruch’s membrane, and RPE<br />

• Overlying subretinal hemorrhage may obscure view of fresh rupture<br />

• rupture will appear as a white, crescent shaped, vertical streak of exposed sclera<br />

http://www.nejm.org/doi/pdf/10.1056/NEJMicm0909506<br />

http://www.eyedefectsresearch.org/mac-degen.html<br />

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov.proxy.lib.pacificu.edu:2048/pmc/a<br />

rticles/PMC3040733/pdf/pone.0011532.pdftool=pmcentrez<br />

http://www.rustoneyeinstitute.com/index.cfm/PageID/3788<br />

High Altitude Retinopathy<br />

• Acquired retinopathy which typically occurs at elevations above 16,000ft<br />

• Delayed onset of retinal hemorrhages on descent from high altitudes is common<br />

• Triad of dilated retinal veins, retinal hemorrhages and optic disc edema<br />

• Part of a spectrum of conditions associated with high altitude/hypoxic conditions<br />

• Acute Mountain Sickness, High Altitude Cerebral Edema, High Altitude Pulmonary Edema<br />

Neovascular (Wet) Macular Degeneration: CNV<br />

• Non-exudative (dry) Macular Degeneration<br />

• drusen, RPE pigment changes, geographic atrophy<br />

• Exudative (wet) Macular Degeneration<br />

• Choroidal neovascularization (CNV)<br />

http://www.djo.harvard.edu<br />

www.redatlas.org<br />

http://www.retinamaculainstitute.com/ocular-education/ocular-trauma<br />

http://webeye.ophth.uiowa.edu<br />

http://legacy.revoptom.com/handbook/sect7e.htm<br />

Retinopathy in Blood Disorders<br />

• Sickle Cell Retinopathy, Anemia, Leukemia, etc<br />

• salmon patch intraretinal hemorrhages, black sunbursts (RPE hyperplasia), seafan<br />

neovascularization, vitreal hemorrhage, CWS, Roth spots<br />

Purtscher Retinopathy<br />

• Associated with head trauma, compressive chest injuries, long bone fracture, acute<br />

pancreatitis, retrobulbar anesthesia, or systemic disorders (ie. Lupus)<br />

• Typically presents bilaterally with presence of CWS, peri-papillary retinal<br />

whitening, dilated retinal venous system, and retinal hemorrhages<br />

Coursebook Page 83 of 139<br />

3


5/29/2012<br />

http://www.mrcophth.com/retinalvasculardisorders/proliferativediabetic.html<br />

http://www.nature.com/nrrheum/journal/v2/n8/fig_tab/ncprheum0268_F6.html<br />

Hypertensive Retinopathy<br />

• Arterial attenuation, vascular leakage leading to retinal edema and deposition<br />

of hard exudates, macular star, CWS, subretinal hemorrhages, ONH swelling<br />

http://www.rustoneyeinstitute.com/index.cfm/PageID/3796<br />

Diabetic Retinopathy<br />

• NPDR: multiple MA and dot/blot hemes, CWS, HE, IRMA, NVD, NVI, NVE<br />

• progressive: mildmoderatesevere<br />

• PDR<br />

http://www.jhu.edu/wctb/coms/general/about-mm/coms1a.htm<br />

http://www.sightnation.com/casephotos/choroidal-melanoma<br />

Initial Presentation<br />

2 weeks<br />

2 months<br />

Choroidal Melanoma<br />

http://www.kellogg.umich.edu/theeyeshaveit/non-trauma/choroidal-melanoma.html<br />

• Present with varying amounts of pigmentation or amelanotic<br />

• If the tumor breaks through Bruch’s membrane, intrinsic blood vessels and<br />

hemorrhages may also be visible<br />

Valsalva Retinopathy<br />

http://webeye.ophth.uiowa.edu/eyeforum/cases/67-Valsalva-Retinopathy-Vision-Loss-Asthma.htm<br />

• Classically presents as a sudden loss of central vision in a healthy individual that is<br />

caused by premacular hemorrhage secondary to Valsalva stress.<br />

• Valsalva maneuver (stress) is defined as “increasing intrathoracic or intraabdominal<br />

pressure against a closed glottis which slows venous return to the heart, decreases stroke<br />

volume and subsequently increases venous system pressure”<br />

Valsalva maneuver: pathophysiology<br />

Causes of Valsalva Stress<br />

2. Diminished<br />

cardiac filling<br />

lowers the arterial<br />

pressure, slows the<br />

pulse and leads to<br />

reflex tachycardia<br />

and peripheral<br />

vasoconstriction.<br />

3. Release of the<br />

strain causes<br />

sudden reduction<br />

of intrathoracic<br />

pressure, further<br />

lowering the<br />

blood pressure<br />

and increasing<br />

the cardiac<br />

pressure.<br />

4. Abrupt<br />

increase in blood<br />

pressure occurs as<br />

blood surges<br />

back to the heart<br />

which induces<br />

reflex<br />

tachycardia.<br />

1. Sudden<br />

increase in<br />

intrathoracic<br />

pressure<br />

decreases venous<br />

return to the heart.<br />

Valsalva<br />

Retinopathy<br />

5. As the sudden rise<br />

in intraocular venous<br />

pressure occurs,<br />

retinal capillaries<br />

spontaneously rupture<br />

which can lean to…<br />

Coursebook Page 84 of 139<br />

4


5/29/2012<br />

Valsalva retinopathy: Benefits of OCT<br />

Treatment vs Observation<br />

Valsalva retinopathy has a tendency to appear at<br />

the macula.<br />

Visual prognosis and treatment options depend on<br />

the size and anatomical level of the hemorrhage.<br />

Use of the SD-OCT can localize the hemorrhage as<br />

sub-ILM and/or subhyaloid.<br />

Researchers continue to<br />

dispute if the plane of the<br />

hemorrhage is truly sub-ILM,<br />

subhyaloid, or if the ILM and<br />

hyaloid membrane are in fact fused.<br />

Why Consider Treatment<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

Patient may have profound vision<br />

loss for up to 6mo if left untreated.<br />

Longstanding macular hemorrhages<br />

(even 10DD in area with bullous<br />

intraretinal hemorrhage overlying<br />

• OS: flat<br />

Periphery: attached 360 OU<br />

Macular OCT<br />

OD: large subretinal elevation with large intraretinal cyst<br />

OS: flat<br />

Coursebook Page 85 of 139<br />

5


5/29/2012<br />

Assessment/Plan:<br />

Assessment<br />

Subretinal hemorrhage OD – large, >10DD in area,<br />

prominently elevated<br />

• Given history of patient moving entertainment unit by himself this<br />

likely represents Valsalva retinopathy<br />

Plan<br />

Request patient be sent to Casey Eye Institute for FA and<br />

photos to evaluate for alternative underlying etiology.<br />

Counseled patient only course of action is observation.<br />

Monocular precautions.<br />

RTC 4mo for f/u.<br />

Follow-Up<br />

Attempt #1 (1/23/12)<br />

2mo f/u at Roseburg VAMC – cancelled by patient<br />

Attempt #2 (3/27/12)<br />

4mo f/u at Roseburg VAMC – wife reports they will not be<br />

able to make it to any f/u appointments<br />

*Note: Review of patient chart shows high no-show and<br />

cancel rate for lab work and PCP appointments as well.<br />

Chart notes or test results from Casey Eye Institute were not<br />

available.<br />

Valsalva Retinopathy vs Retinal Artery Macroaneurysm (RAM)<br />

http://savesightcentre.com/diagnostic-testing.html<br />

<br />

Dx: Valsalva Retinopathy<br />

based on case history<br />

OCT would typically show sub-ILM<br />

hemorrhage<br />

<br />

Dx: RAM<br />

hemorrhage present at multiple layers<br />

OCT shows subretinal and intraretinal<br />

elevation<br />

patient is >60yrs old and has h/o<br />

uncontrolled hypertension<br />

RAM “idiopathic, acquired dilation of<br />

a major retinal arteriole typically<br />

occurring at the first three bifurcations<br />

or an area of A/V crossing”<br />

Conclusions and Clinical Pearls<br />

References<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<strong>Diagnosis</strong> of Valsalva retinopathy or hemorrhage as a<br />

complication of RAM would not change the plan or outcome in this<br />

patient.<br />

Multi-layer retinal hemorrhages would not benefit from Nd:YAG<br />

membranotomy. Direct or indirect laser treatment for macroaneurysm is<br />

controversial.<br />

Remember to consider your patient’s occupation or recreational<br />

demands. Is binocular vision needed as a work requirement How<br />

is the vision in the other eye<br />

As always, patients need to be presented with all treatment<br />

options and educated on expected timelines for possible visual<br />

recovery.<br />

Al-Mujaini AS, Montana CC. Valsalva retinopathy in pregnancy: a case report. Journal of Medical Case Reports.<br />

2008. 2:101.<br />

De Maeyer K, et al. Sub-inner limiting membrane haemorrhage: causes and treatment with vitrectomy. British Journal<br />

of Ophthalmology. 2007. 91:869-872.<br />

Duane TD. Valsalva hemorrhagic retinopathy. Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc. 1972. 70: 298-313.<br />

Kaiser, Friedman. The Massachusetts Eye and Ear Infirmary Illustrated Manual of Ophthalmology. 2 nd edition. 2004.<br />

Kanski J. Clinical Ophthalmology, A Systemic Approach. 6 th edition, 2007.<br />

Khan M.T., et al. Nd:YAG laser treatment for Valsalva premacular hemorrhages: 6 month follow up. Alternative<br />

management options for preretinal premacular hemorrhages in Valsalva retinopathy. International Ophthalmology.<br />

2008. 28:325-327.<br />

Kwok AK, Lai TY, Chan NR. Epiretinal membrane formation with internal limiting membrane wrinkling after Nd:YAG<br />

lasaer membranotomy in Valsalva retinopathy. American Journal of Ophthalmology. Oct 2003. 136(4):763-766.<br />

Mumcuoglu T, Durukan A, et al. Outcomes of Nd:YAG Laser Treatment for Valsalva Retinopathy Due to Intense<br />

Military Exercise. Ophthalmology Surgery, Lasers and Imaging. Jan/Feb 2009. Vol 40:19-24.<br />

Sabella P, Bottoni, F, Staurenghi, G. Spectral-domain OCT evaluation of Nd:YAG laser treatment for Valsalva<br />

retinopathy. Graefe’s Arch Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology. 2010. 248:599-601.<br />

Shukla D, Naresh K, Kim R. Optical coherence tomography findings in Valsalva retinopathy. American Journal of<br />

Ophthalmology. July 2005. 140:134-136.<br />

Tatlipinar S, et al. Optical coherence tomography features of sub-internal limiting membrane hemorrhage and<br />

preretinal membrane in Valsalva retinopathy. Canadian Journal of Ophthalmology. 2007. 42:129-130.<br />

Coursebook Page 86 of 139<br />

6


5/29/2012<br />

Thank you!<br />

Roseburg VA Eye Care Team<br />

• Dr. Bryan Deck, OD<br />

• Dr. Dirk Dittemore, OD<br />

• Dr. Duva Appleman, MD<br />

Coursebook Page 87 of 139<br />

7


Objectives<br />

Perioperative Vision Loss from<br />

Non‐Ophthalmic Surgery<br />

Brett Richardson, O.D.<br />

Spokane VAMC<br />

509.434.7032<br />

• My goal for this presentation is for you to<br />

understand that<br />

– Non‐ophthalmic surgeries can result in<br />

Perioperative Vision Loss (POVL)<br />

– Altered vascular supply is the primary cause<br />

Objectives<br />

• I will be discussing<br />

– Common surgeries that result in Perioperative<br />

vision loss (POVL)<br />

• Cardiac<br />

• Spine<br />

– Most common types of POVL<br />

• Ischemic Optic Neuropathy<br />

• Retinal Vascular Occlusion<br />

• Cortical Blindness<br />

Case<br />

• 65 y.o. WM<br />

• POHx<br />

– Mild Hypertensive Retinopathy OU<br />

– RPE mottling OU<br />

• PMHx<br />

– Malignant Hypertension (as high as 267/158)<br />

– Hypercholesterolemia<br />

– Coronary Artery Disease<br />

– Myocardial Infarction with Angioplasty and stent 2007<br />

– Renal failure<br />

– Angioplasty and stent 2011 (2 weeks ago)<br />

Case<br />

• CC: “During angioplasty and stent surgery 2<br />

weeks ago, my blood pressure shot way up<br />

and my vision has been blurry and distorted<br />

ever since.”<br />

Case<br />

• VA<br />

– od: 20/80 ‐>> ph70, very slow<br />

– os: 20/150 ‐>> phni, very slow<br />

• BCVA<br />

– od: 20/40<br />

– os: 20/100<br />

• PERRLA (‐) APD<br />

• Tonometry<br />

– od: 13<br />

– os: 14<br />

Coursebook Page 88 of 139


Case<br />

• Ant Seg: Unremarkable<br />

• Fundus<br />

– Nerve ou: 0.4rd, (‐) pallor<br />

– Macula: Mild Mottling OS>OD<br />

– Vasculature ou: 2/3, mild nicking<br />

– Posterior Pole: unremarkable ou<br />

– Periphery: flat ou<br />

Case<br />

• Additional Testing<br />

– OCT: macular<br />

• od: 176microns centrally, normal contour<br />

• os: 176microns centrally, normal contour<br />

– BP: 120/72<br />

– Visual Field<br />

Case ‐ Visual Fields #1<br />

Case ‐ CT Scan<br />

• Unremarkable<br />

Homonymous Macular Quadronopsia<br />

Case – Follow Up<br />

Case –Visual Fields #2<br />

• 4 Months later<br />

– VA<br />

• od: 20/60+ phni<br />

• os: 20/100 phni<br />

– Fundus: No significant changes<br />

• (‐) Optic Nerve Pallor<br />

– Visual Field<br />

Generalized Depression OU!!<br />

Coursebook Page 89 of 139


Case – Follow Up<br />

Case –Visual Fields #3<br />

• 8 months later<br />

– VA<br />

• od:20/30<br />

• os:20/100<br />

– Fundus: No Significant changes<br />

– Optic Nerve: (‐) pallor ou<br />

– Visual Field:<br />

Imaging<br />

Fundus Photos<br />

• MRI<br />

– Chronic small right occipital infarct<br />

– Chronic small vessel ischemic changes and chronic<br />

lacunar infarcts<br />

• MRA<br />

– Unremarkable<br />

<strong>Diagnosis</strong><br />

• Angioplasty with stent surgery causing<br />

occipital lobe infarction resulting in<br />

homonymous macular quadranopsia leading<br />

to cortical blindness secondary to cerebral<br />

ischemia<br />

• CARDIAC SURGERY CORTICAL BLINDNESS<br />

Study<br />

• 10 Year study from 1996‐2005 by Nationwide<br />

Inpatient Sample (NIS).<br />

• 74 million patients<br />

– 5.7 million relevant surgical patients<br />

• 8 most common surgeries in U.S.<br />

• Monitoring for Perioperative visual loss<br />

– Ischemic Optic Neuropathy (ION)<br />

– Retinal Vascular Occlusion (RVO)<br />

– Cortical Blindness (CB)<br />

Coursebook Page 90 of 139


Study<br />

• Incidence of POVL<br />

– Cardiac Surgery: 8.64/10,000<br />

– Spine Surgery: 3.09/10,000<br />

– Appendectomy: 0.12/10,000<br />

– Total: 2.35/10,000 (all 8 surgery types)<br />

• POVL in Cardiac Surgery<br />

– RVO 77%<br />

– ION 16%<br />

– CB 8%<br />

• POVL in Spine Surgery<br />

– CB 49%<br />

– ION 28%<br />

– RVO 23%<br />

Study<br />

• Findings<br />

– Highest rate of POVL is found in cardiac and spine<br />

surgeries<br />

– Prevalence: Males vs. Females 2:1<br />

– ION highest in patients 50‐64 y/o<br />

– RVO highest in patients > 65 y/o<br />

– CB highest in patients < 18 y/o<br />

– Highest prevalence in patients < 18 y/o (4.37/10,000)<br />

– POVL remains unpredictable and is not related to any<br />

particular hospital or degree of surgical experience<br />

Literature Review Reveals:<br />

• Ischemic Optic Neuropathy<br />

– 3 Forms<br />

• Perioperative, Arteritic, Non‐arteritic,<br />

– Hypotension ION<br />

– Anemia ION<br />

• > 1L (average 5L)<br />

– Hypothermia ION<br />

• blood viscosity<br />

• 1 o Cdecrease = 6‐7% decrease in cerebral blood flow<br />

– Ocular Hypertension (prone position)<br />

– Surgical Time (> 6 hours)<br />

Literature Review Reveals:<br />

• Central Retinal Artery Occlusion (CRAO)<br />

– Spine Surgeries (933 cases)<br />

• Declined Prone position venous stasis in capillary<br />

beds<br />

– 70% secondary to ocular trauma<br />

• Ocular compression from head rest can raise IOP to<br />

sufficient level to cause ischemia<br />

Literature Review Reveals:<br />

• Cortical Blindness<br />

– Destruction or denervation of 1 o Visual Cortex<br />

(Occipital Lobe) or Optic Radiations<br />

– Highest incidence in cardiac surgery (CABG)<br />

– Results from embolism, stroke<br />

– Risk Factors<br />

• HTN, DM, Renal insufficiency, Smoking, PVD, COPD<br />

Summary<br />

• Perioperative Vision Loss Likely to occur:<br />

– Cardiac Surgery > Spine Surgery > all others<br />

– ION > CRAO > Cortical Blindness<br />

– High Risk patients<br />

• DM, Smoking, HTN, Vascular disease<br />

– High Risk Intraoperative Complications<br />

• Blood loss > 5L<br />

• Hypotension < 90 mmHg<br />

• Long Operating Times (> 6 hours)<br />

Coursebook Page 91 of 139


Coursebook Page 92 of 139


5/31/2012<br />

Diabetic Teleretinal Imaging<br />

Program:<br />

An Assessment of the Diabetic Teleretinal Imaging Program (TRIP) at<br />

the Portland Veterans Affairs Medical Center (PVAMC) - A Retrospective Study<br />

Diabetes Statistics<br />

• 24 million people in the US have DM<br />

• 78% have retinopathy if DM >15yrs<br />

Keely L. Hoban, O.D.<br />

Grace L. Tsan, O.D.<br />

Portland VA Medical Center<br />

June 4, 2012<br />

• 28.5 % of people with diabetes ages >40 years<br />

have diabetic retinopathy<br />

Burden of Diabetic Eye Disease<br />

• #1 cause of blindness in working‐aged adults<br />

in the US<br />

What does this mean for<br />

optometry<br />

Health<br />

Care<br />

System<br />

Burden<br />

Eye Care<br />

Providers<br />

Patients<br />

PVAMC Research Team<br />

• Weon Jun, O.D., FAAO<br />

• Keely L. Hoban, O.D.<br />

• Steve Mansberger, M.D., MPH<br />

• Amy L. Pedersen, O.D.<br />

• Kevin J. Riedel, O.D.<br />

• Grace L. Tsan, O.D.<br />

Objectives<br />

• Advantages and disadvantages of Diabetic Teleretinal Imaging<br />

Program (TRIP).<br />

• Types of clinical settings that may benefit from TRIP.<br />

• Effectiveness of TRIP at the PVAMC.<br />

• Identify program improvements for TRIP at the PVAMC<br />

Coursebook Page 93 of 139<br />

1


5/31/2012<br />

What is Telemedicine<br />

Store‐and‐Forward Telehealth<br />

http://www.telehealth.va.gov/<br />

Annual vs. Biennially<br />

DFE<br />

TRIPDFE<br />

Teledermatology Teleretinal Imaging Teleradiology<br />

How does TRIP work<br />

Four Non‐Mydriatic Images<br />

Cavallerano AA, Conlin PR. Teleimaging to screen for diabetic retinopathy in the Veterans Health Administration. J Diabetes Sci Technol 2(1): 33-9, 2008.<br />

Referral Guidelines for<br />

Diabetic Eye Exam<br />

Who may benefit from TRIP<br />

• Target Patients:<br />

– DM patients with low risk for retinopathy<br />

• i.e. Newly diagnosed DM patients, patients w/ well controlled A1c<br />

– DM patients with diabetic retinopathy that have been lost to follow‐up<br />

• Other Uses:<br />

– Identify co‐morbid eye conditions<br />

• Providers:<br />

– Hospitals<br />

– Academic Institutions<br />

– Group Practice Settings<br />

Cavallerano AA, Conlin PR. Teleimaging to screen for diabetic retinopathy in the Veterans Health Administration. J Diabetes Sci Technol 2(1): 33-9, 2008.<br />

Coursebook Page 94 of 139<br />

2


5/31/2012<br />

Goals for TRIP<br />

CASE #1<br />

• Increase compliance with diabetic eye exams<br />

• Improve patient education on importance of diabetic<br />

eye exam<br />

• Early intervention to treat and manage diabetic<br />

retinopathy<br />

Retrospective Chart Review<br />

• Inclusion Criteria:<br />

– Reviewed CPRS medical records of 200 patients from 1757<br />

diagnosed diabetic patients<br />

– Teleretinal imaging performed between<br />

January 1, 2010 and January 1, 2011<br />

• Exclusion Criteria<br />

PVAMC TRIP Locations<br />

Data<br />

Vancouver<br />

• Quality image:<br />

90% adequate<br />

• Male: 97%<br />

• Average age: 64.7 yrs (std dev 10.2)<br />

• Race:<br />

91% Caucasian<br />

• Avg Height/Weight: 70 inches/230 lbs<br />

• Avg BMI: 33.8 kg/m 2 (obesity >30)<br />

• Avg lab glucose:<br />

155 mg/dL<br />

• Avg HbA1c: 7.3%<br />

• Average duration of DM: 9 yrs<br />

Coursebook Page 95 of 139<br />

3


5/31/2012<br />

Co‐morbid Conditions<br />

• Fasting Cholesterol: 166 (normal


5/31/2012<br />

Efficiency of TRIP at PVAMC<br />

Efficiency of TRIP at PVAMC<br />

• Reader<br />

(Optometrist)<br />

Schedule<br />

appointment<br />

(80%)<br />

•Eye Clinic<br />

Redundancy<br />

11%<br />

6 months<br />

Duplicate Recall<br />

37%<br />

1 year<br />

Refer to eye<br />

clinic (99%)<br />

•Imager<br />

(at PCP dept)<br />

Dilated eye<br />

exam<br />

Eye<br />

Exam<br />

Teleretinal<br />

Imaging<br />

Teleretinal<br />

Recall<br />

TRIP Research Trends<br />

Good referral into eye clinic from readers<br />

Low redundancy by imagers<br />

Majority of patients had no DR<br />

Good compliance for referrals from imagers<br />

• High teleretinal imaging recall within one year<br />

of imaging<br />

Suggested Program Improvements<br />

to TRIP<br />

• Future recall for teleretinal imaging should be based<br />

on reader’s recommendation.<br />

• Increase awareness of all eye care providers to check<br />

future scheduled eye clinic appointments to reduce<br />

duplicated eye clinic and TRIP appointments<br />

Comparison to other VA TRIP<br />

Comparison to Non‐VA Populations<br />

Mansberger SL, Gleitsmann K, Gardine S, Sheppler C, Demirel S, Becker TM. The Comparative Effectiveness of Telemedicine for Providing Diabetic<br />

Retinopathy Screening Exams: A Randomized Controlled Trial<br />

Coursebook Page 97 of 139<br />

5


5/31/2012<br />

Improved Compliance with TRIP<br />

Sensitivity and Specificity of TRIP<br />

Mansberger SL, Gleitsmann K, Gardine S, Sheppler C, Demirel S, Becker TM. The Comparative Effectiveness of Telemedicine for Providing Diabetic<br />

Retinopathy Screening Exams: A Randomized Controlled Trial<br />

Benefits of TRIP<br />

Case #4<br />

Increased referrals for comprehensive eye exams<br />

Improved patient awareness and compliance<br />

Initiated timely treatment<br />

TRIP overcomes barriers for annual eye exams<br />

34‐64% of patients with DM in private and public sectors have<br />

annual eye exams, VA excels in this area<br />

Treatment is 90% effective in preventing severe vision loss<br />

Patient Satisfaction<br />

• Universally Positive<br />

• Efficient<br />

• Less time sensitive<br />

• More convenient for pt to be undilated<br />

• Pt Ed, improved understanding/awareness<br />

• Comfortable<br />

• Improved Compliance!!<br />

Economic Benefits<br />

• DM vision loss = $132 billion<br />

• Detecting proliferative diabetic retinopathy<br />

• Averting cases of severe vision loss<br />

• More time efficient<br />

• Improves adherence<br />

• TRIP may help utilize eye doctors time more<br />

effectively<br />

Cavallerano AA, Conlin PR. Teleimaging to screen for diabetic retinopathy in the Veterans Health Administration. J Diabetes Sci Technol 2(1): 33-9, 2008.<br />

Cavallerano AA, Conlin PR. Teleimaging to screen for diabetic retinopathy in the Veterans Health Administration. J Diabetes Sci Technol 2(1): 33-9, 2008.<br />

Coursebook Page 98 of 139<br />

6


5/31/2012<br />

Practical Implications: How to Bill<br />

Reimbursement<br />

PCP Site<br />

Specialist<br />

Review<br />

Diabetic<br />

Screening<br />

Encounter<br />

• Medicare<br />

– CPT 92227: remote imaging for detection of<br />

retinal disease<br />

– CPT 92228: remote imaging for monitoring and<br />

management of active retinal disease<br />

• Private and commercial carriers<br />

– CPT 92250/S0625<br />

Summary<br />

REFERENCES<br />

• TRIP fulfills the goals of screening low risk diabetic<br />

patients<br />

• Occasionally will miss some findings, or findings may<br />

be worse or improved as it is a “static image”<br />

• Helps patients to maintain quality of life and<br />

independence<br />

1. Huang ES, Basu A, O'Grady M, Capretta JC. Projecting the future diabetes population size and related costs for<br />

the U.S. Diabetes Care 32(12):2225‐2229, 2009.<br />

2. Diabetic Retinopathy. Preferred Practice Patterns. San Francisco: American Academy of Ophthalmology, 2008.<br />

3. Klein R, Klein BE, Moss SE, Davis MD, DeMets DL. The Wisconsin epidemiologic study of diabetic retinopathy. III.<br />

Prevalence and risk of diabetic retinopathy when age at diagnosis is 30 or more years. Arch Ophthalmol<br />

102(4):527‐532, 1984.<br />

4. Ferris FL, 3rd, Davis MD, Aiello LM. Treatment of diabetic retinopathy. N Engl J Med 341(9):667‐678, 1999.<br />

5. Garg S, Davis R. Diabetic retinopathy screening update. Clinical Diabetes: A publication of the American<br />

Diabetes Association 27:140‐145, 2009.<br />

6. Conlin PR, Fisch BM, Orcutt JC, Hetrick BJ, Darkins AW. Framework for a national teleretinal imaging program to<br />

screen for diabetic retinopathy in Veterans Health Administration patients. J Rehabil Res Dev 43(6): 741‐8, 2006.<br />

7. Cavallerano AA, Conlin PR. Teleimaging to screen for diabetic retinopathy in the Veterans Health Administration.<br />

J Diabetes Sci Technol 2(1): 33‐9, 2008.<br />

8. Lin DY, Blumenkranz MS, Brothers RJ, Grosvenor DM. The sensitivity and specificity of single‐field nonmydriatic<br />

monochromatic digital fundus photography with remote image interpretation for diabetic retinopathy<br />

screening: a comparison with ophthalmoscopy and standardized mydriatic color photography. Am J Ophthalmol<br />

134(2):204‐213, 2002.<br />

9. Farley TF, Mandava N, Prall FR, Carsky C. Accuracy of primary care clinician in screening for diabetic retinopathy<br />

using single‐image retinal photography. Ann Fam Med 6(5): 428‐34, 2008.<br />

10. Mansberger SL, Gleitsmann K, Gardine S, Sheppler C, Demirel S, Becker TM. The Comparative Effectiveness of<br />

Telemedicine for Providing Diabetic Retinopathy Screening Exams: A Randomized Controlled Trial<br />

THANK YOU!<br />

Portland VA Medical Center<br />

&<br />

<strong>Pacific</strong> <strong>University</strong> College of Optometry<br />

Coursebook Page 99 of 139<br />

7


5/29/2012<br />

Radioiodine Therapy and<br />

Graves’ Ophthalmopathy<br />

ZACHARY OSWALD, O.D.<br />

RESIDENT AT<br />

WALLA WALLA VA MEDICAL CENTER &<br />

PACIFIC CATARACT AND LASER INSTITUTE –<br />

KENNEWICK<br />

MAY 29, 2012<br />

Disclosure<br />

• Zachary Oswald, O.D., developed this course<br />

material and information independently without any<br />

relevant financial interests or influence of<br />

commercial interest.<br />

• Consent was given by the patient to present the<br />

photographs and personal information included in<br />

this course.<br />

Learning Objective<br />

Course Outline<br />

• By the end of this presentation, attendees will be able<br />

to:<br />

◦ 1. Understand, evaluate, and treat Graves’ Ophthalmopathy<br />

with more confidence.<br />

◦ 2. Recognize that using radioiodine therapy to treat<br />

hyperthyroidism can cause the development or worsening<br />

Graves’ Ophthalmopathy.<br />

◦ 3. Better understand the process of co-management with the<br />

other members of a patient’s health care provider team.<br />

• Case Presentation<br />

• Radioiodine in the treatment of hyperthyroidism<br />

• Graves’ Ophthalmopathy Overview<br />

• Possible Treatments of Graves’ Ophthalmopathy<br />

• Explore contraindications and possible side effects of<br />

oral prednisone.<br />

• Co-management Tips<br />

11/18/09 1 st Visit at WWVAMC<br />

11/18/09 1 st Visit at WWVAMC<br />

• 75 yowm<br />

• Comprehensive Exam<br />

• Personal Ocular History<br />

◦ Followed as glaucoma suspect due to larger C/D ratios for 35<br />

years, has never been prescribed glaucoma medication.<br />

◦ 2007 Cataract Extraction at PCLI - Lewiston: phaco with pc iol<br />

both eyes.<br />

◦ Last eye exam was in 2007 in Lewiston, ID.<br />

◦ Was told he had some signs of macular degeneration at last eye<br />

exam.<br />

◦ Wears Bifocals<br />

• Problem List:<br />

◦ Coronary Artery Disease<br />

◦ Congestive Heart Failure<br />

◦ Pulmonary Hypertension<br />

◦ Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease<br />

◦ Dependence on supplemental oxygen<br />

◦ Gout<br />

◦ Dermatitis<br />

◦ Tinnitus<br />

◦ Sensorineural hearing loss<br />

◦ MI 12/21/91, stopped smoking then<br />

Coursebook Page 100 of 139<br />

1


5/29/2012<br />

11/18/09 1 st Visit at WWVAMC<br />

11/18/09 1 st Visit at WWVAMC<br />

• Medications:<br />

◦ Bosentan 125mg bid<br />

◦ Calcium Carbonate 650mg tab qd<br />

◦ Citalopram 20mg ½ tab qd<br />

◦ Clopidogrel Bisulfate 75mg tab qd<br />

◦ Colchicine 0.6mg tab qd<br />

◦ Digoxin 0.125mg tab qd<br />

◦ Flunisolide inhaler bid<br />

◦ Furosemide 40mg tab bid<br />

◦ Hydrocodone 5 / Acetaminopthen 500mg tid prn<br />

◦ Levothyroxine 0.175mg tab qd<br />

• Medications Continued<br />

◦ Magnesium Oxide 400mg tab qd<br />

◦ Potassium Chloride 10meq 2 tab bid<br />

◦ Ranitidine HCL 150mg tab bid<br />

◦ Sildenafil Citrate 50mg ½ tab tid<br />

◦ Simvastatin 10mg tab qhs<br />

◦ Sprionolactone 2 tab qAM, 1 tab afternoon<br />

◦ Tiotropium 1 tab in inhaler qd<br />

◦ Warfarin 5mg tab qd<br />

11/18/09 1 st Visit at WWVAMC<br />

11/18/09 A & P<br />

• +1.00-2.25 x 090 20/25<br />

• +1.00-2.25 x 090 20/20-2<br />

• Add: 2.50 20/20<br />

• Cover Test Distance 4^ exophoria<br />

• ASSESSMENT:<br />

◦ 1) Glaucoma Suspect due to larger C/D ratios (RE 0.55/0.55, LE 0.5/0.5). IOP<br />

18mmHg RE, LE today.<br />

◦ 2) Macular pigment changes BE<br />

◦ 3) Pseudophakia BE with trace PCO<br />

◦ 4) Hyperopia, Astigmatism, Presbyopia BE<br />

• PLAN:<br />

◦ 1&2) Fundus photos taken today. Monitor pt. in one year with a comprehensive<br />

exam watch for changes in ONH, pressure check, and macular changes.<br />

◦ 3) Monitor in 1 year at comprehensive exam.<br />

◦ 4) No glasses ordered today. Pt. satisfied with vision and condition of current<br />

glasses.<br />

• Return to clinic in 1 year for comprehensive examination c FDT to monitor<br />

macular pigment changes and ONH cupping.<br />

01/20/11 Fee Basis Exam at Private Office<br />

06/27/11 WWVAMC – Age 76<br />

• +1.00-1.75 x 089 20/40<br />

• +1.50-2.00 x 086 20/30-<br />

• Add: 2.50<br />

• BE 1-2+ PCO encroaching centrally<br />

• YAG performed in March 2011 at PCLI – Lewiston.<br />

• Binocular Diplopia reported as starting in February<br />

2011.<br />

• Veteran has been working with private doctor in<br />

Lewiston. Last appointment with private doctor<br />

about a week ago.<br />

• Unsure what is causing diplopia.<br />

• Has glasses with prism that help, but eyes still feel<br />

like they are not working together.<br />

• Would like to start coming to VA again because it<br />

will be more cost effective.<br />

Coursebook Page 101 of 139<br />

2


5/29/2012<br />

06/27/11 WWVAMC<br />

06/27/11 WWVAMC<br />

◦ Problem List same as initial visit.<br />

◦ Medication additions since initial visit in 2009:<br />

Albuterol 2 puffs qid prn<br />

Bacitracin ung apply to affected area tid prn (dermatitis)<br />

Carboxymethylcellulose 0.5% qid BE prn<br />

Loratadine 10mg qd<br />

Losartan Potassium 50mg ½ tab qd<br />

Mometasone Furoate 1-2 sprays qd<br />

Mupirocin 2% ung affected areas bid (dermatitis)<br />

Ocular Lubricant Pres Free ung qhs BE<br />

Nitrofurantoin 100mg cap bid<br />

◦ Medications no longer taking since initial visit 2009:<br />

Colchicine<br />

Flunisolide<br />

Simvastatin<br />

Spironolactone<br />

• Hab Rx from Fee Basis Dr.<br />

◦ +1.25-2.00*088 3-4^BD 20/40+2<br />

◦ +1.25-2.50*087 3^BU 20/50+2<br />

◦ Base Curve<br />

RE 6.2<br />

LE 5.8<br />

• EOMs<br />

◦ Sup. right gaze, right eye appears underacting.<br />

◦ Inf. left gaze, left eye appears underacting.<br />

Which muscles are affected<br />

Actions of extraocular muscles<br />

LR<br />

SR<br />

IO<br />

MR<br />

IO<br />

MR<br />

SR<br />

LR<br />

Muscle Primary Action Secondary Tertiary<br />

Superior Rectus Elevation Intorsion Adduction<br />

Inferior Rectus Depression Extorsion Adduction<br />

Medial Rectus Adduction<br />

Inferior Oblique Excyclotorsion Elevation Abduction<br />

Superior Oblique Incyclotorsion Depression Abduction<br />

Lateral Rectus Abduction<br />

IR<br />

SO<br />

SO<br />

IR<br />

Right Eye<br />

Left Eye<br />

06/27/11 WWVAMC<br />

• Cover Test c older Rx (without prism):<br />

◦ Dist: 7^BD RE neutralizes vert movement, residual 2^ BO<br />

◦ Near: 7^BD RE, 8^ BI<br />

• Cover Test c habitual Rx (prism):<br />

◦ Dist: ortho vert and horiz<br />

◦ Near: ortho vert and horiz<br />

06/27/11 WWVAMC<br />

• Refraction:<br />

◦ +0.75-1.50*090 3^BD 20/25+1<br />

◦ +1.75-2.50*081 2^BU 20/25-2 BE:20/25-2<br />

◦ ADD: 2.50 20/25-<br />

• Binocular Testing:<br />

◦ Distance<br />

Horiz Phoria: 5^ BO<br />

Vergences: BI: x/-2/-5, BO: x/20/9<br />

Vert Phoria: 7^ BU LE<br />

Vergences (with 3^BO otherwise no fusion):<br />

LE BU 9/5, BD -2/NA<br />

◦ Near:<br />

Horiz: 10^ BI<br />

Vert 6^ BU LE<br />

Coursebook Page 102 of 139<br />

3


5/29/2012<br />

06/27/11 WWVAMC<br />

• Trial Framed the refraction:<br />

◦ +0.75-1.50*090 3^BD 20/25+1<br />

◦ +1.75-2.50*081 2^BU 20/25-2 BE:20/25-2<br />

◦ ADD: 2.50 20/25-<br />

• Patient reports the letters feel like they are trying to<br />

pull apart, but 5^ BU LE was preferred to 4^ BU or<br />

6^BU. No prism preferred horizontally.<br />

06/27/11 WWVAMC<br />

• Assessment:<br />

◦ 1. Right hypertropia causing diplopia – several muscles may be<br />

involved causing prism combinations to not totally correct the<br />

diplopia.<br />

◦ 2. Dry Eye Syndrome – causing some fluctuation of vision.<br />

◦ 3. Dry AMD BE – at most is minimally affecting vision.<br />

◦ 4. Glaucoma suspect secondary to larger c/d ratios (0.45/0.45 BE)<br />

pressures up from before (21/19), sloping discs.<br />

◦ 5. Bilateral pseudophakia s/p YAG BE<br />

• Plan:<br />

◦ 1. Ordered new bifocals.<br />

◦ 2. Encouraged to continue artificial tears 4x day and ointment at<br />

night.<br />

◦ 3-5. Monitor in one year with full exam.<br />

09/09/11 WWVAMC – Age 77<br />

09/09/11 WWVAMC<br />

• Vet reports that he received his new spectacles about<br />

2 weeks ago. They function better than previous<br />

spectacles, but he reports continued diplopia with<br />

and without them. Sometimes in the afternoon he<br />

sees singly. Right eye reported as much blurrier than<br />

the left with new spectacles.<br />

• External Exam:<br />

◦ Patient uses oxygen by nasal cannula tank with tank set to a 5<br />

or 6 and his lips have a blue hue (vet has pulmonary<br />

hypertension). Right eye possibly proptotic.<br />

• Visual Acuities<br />

• Current Spec Rx:<br />

◦ +1.25-1.25*092 3^BD 20/50 PH: 20/40<br />

◦ +1.75-2.50*082 2^BU 20/25+1<br />

◦ Add:2.25<br />

• Refraction:<br />

◦ RE: +0.75-2.00*092 20/25-2<br />

09/09/11 WWVAMC<br />

09/09/11 WWVAMC<br />

• EOMs:<br />

◦ Restricted RE sup/temp, LE inf/temp, Possible restriction LE<br />

sup/temp as well. (+) forced duction test.<br />

• Pupils: PERRL (-) APD 5-3, 2+ reaction light.<br />

• Cover Test over new specs:<br />

◦ Distance: 3^BD RE neutralizes vertical movement.<br />

◦ Near: 3^BD RE neutralizes vertical movement. 6^exo after<br />

vertical prism correction.<br />

• Red Cap Test: = saturation BE<br />

• Amsler Grid: BE (-) metamorphopsia, (-) scotomas<br />

• Exophthalmometry: 22/21 @ 110 (avg is 15-17)<br />

• SLE:<br />

• Lids, Lashes, Adnexa: BE: edematous upper lids, 2+<br />

dermatochalasis, 2+ MG inspissation, 1+ scalloped<br />

lid margins, 1+ debris along lashes.<br />

• Cornea: BE: Tr-1+ arcus 360*, 1+ diffuse SPK cent to<br />

inf.<br />

Coursebook Page 103 of 139<br />

4


5/29/2012<br />

Suspect Graves’ Ophthalmopathy<br />

• Pertinent medical history:<br />

◦ Veteran has a history of hyperthyroidism that was treated with<br />

radioiodine ablation.<br />

◦ Veteran is currently taking one 0.175mg tablet of levothyroxine<br />

once a day for thyroid.<br />

• Labs<br />

◦ 05/05/08: Thyroid Stimulating Hormone (TSH) 0.85 (o.3-<br />

6.0)<br />

◦ 03/25/09: Free T-4: 1.7 (0.6-2.0)<br />

TSH: 3.76 (0.3-6.0)<br />

◦ 03/18/10: TSH: 2.10 (0.3-6.0)<br />

◦ 08/17/11: TSH: 1.64 (0.3-6.0)<br />

09/09/11 WWVAMC<br />

• Assessment:<br />

◦ 1. Binocular diplopia with right eye hypertropia.<br />

◦ 2. Bilateral dry eye syndrome.<br />

• Plan:<br />

◦ 1. Ordered CT scan of both eyes from orbit to chiasm without<br />

contrast enhancement to review in clinic to rule out Graves, Thyroid,<br />

or compressive sources. Discussed diplopia as possibly related to<br />

thyroid problems and possible treatment options. Dispensed and<br />

applied 3^ BD Fresnel prism on the right lens which allowed single<br />

vision today. Dispensed patch to use as needed to prevent diplopia.<br />

Will call patient following review of CT results to schedule follow up<br />

appointment.<br />

◦ 2. Patient education. Encouraged patient to continue artificial tears 4<br />

times a day and lubricating ointment once at night both eyes.<br />

Monitor.<br />

What do you notice<br />

CT Results<br />

09/09/2011<br />

• Findings:<br />

◦ “The patient has rather marked enlargement identified of the right<br />

superior rectus muscle and the left inferior rectus muscle. There is a<br />

lesser degree of enlargement of the right inferior rectus muscle and<br />

the left superior rectus muscle. There is some stranding identified<br />

surrounding the right superior rectus and left inferior rectus muscle.<br />

This appears to infiltrate the whole muscle body itself with regards to<br />

the right superior and left inferior rectus muscles. The remainder<br />

appear to be infiltrating the mid body of the muscle itself.<br />

◦ Optic nerves appear to be grossly normal. The remainder of the<br />

extraocular muscles are normal.<br />

◦ There is is diffuse cerebral atrophy noted. Some mild mucosal<br />

thickening in both maxillary sinuses.<br />

CT Results<br />

CT Scan Coronal<br />

• Impression:<br />

◦ “The patient has findings most compatible with Grave’s<br />

Ophthalmopathy.”<br />

Coursebook Page 104 of 139<br />

5


5/29/2012<br />

CT Scan Coronal<br />

Treatment Options<br />

• Researched treatment options that would work best<br />

for this patient.<br />

• Decided that oral prednisone would be best with<br />

goals of:<br />

◦ 1. Reducing periorbital edema.<br />

◦ 2. Reducing amount of exophthalmos.<br />

◦ 3. Reducing diplopia.<br />

• Who should manage this treatment plan<br />

Co-management with PCP<br />

Called clinical pharmacist at the VA<br />

• We called the patient’s PCP at 12:15pm on 09/27/11 to<br />

update her with the status of this condition and ask if she<br />

would feel more comfortable handling the Prednisone<br />

treatment.<br />

• She responded that she would prefer that someone with<br />

more experience in this field handled the treatment, and<br />

she would be happy to coordinate follow up for systemic<br />

side effects with Mr. Parks' primary care health team.<br />

• Primary health team includes VA PCP, VA clinical<br />

pharmacist, private PCP, pulmonologist, and<br />

cardiologist.<br />

• Asked him to review the patient’s medications and<br />

relate any concerns with starting oral prednisone.<br />

◦ Patient is already taking Ranitidine.<br />

◦ No major contraindications after reviewing problem list and<br />

medications.<br />

Prednisone versus Prednisolone<br />

Watch Liver Function<br />

WWVAMC 10/12/11<br />

• "Though prednisone and prednisolone are used in the same manner<br />

and equally as effective, they should not be confused with each<br />

other. Prednisone is activated by the liver into prednisolone. For<br />

this reason and because it is more easily absorbed, prednisolone is<br />

the drug of choice when hepatic disease or insufficiency is present."<br />

They are both intermediate strength synthetic corticosteroids.<br />

"Prednisone and prednisolone are synthetic members of the<br />

glucocorticoid class of hormones. They are an intermediate acting,<br />

broad antiinflammatory, medication. They have less activity than<br />

dexamethasone or betamethasone, but exhibit greater activity than<br />

hydrocortisone."<br />

From http://patients.uptodate.com/topic.aspf…<br />

• 77 yo WHITE MALE c Graves ophthalmopathy<br />

(Thyroid Eye Disease = TED) presents for follow up.<br />

• Patient reports no diplopia in straight ahead gaze<br />

since addition of 3^BD RE fresnel prism at last<br />

appointment, but image feels like it is "trying to pull<br />

apart."<br />

• Vet reports diplopia at times when looking to the<br />

side, up, or down.<br />

• Vet reports no pain or irritation BE. No dryness or<br />

tearing or redness. Vet reports that sunlight is<br />

bothersome BE.<br />

Coursebook Page 105 of 139<br />

6


5/29/2012<br />

10/12/11<br />

• EOMS: smooth pursuits. LE: restricted sup/temp,<br />

sup, and sup/nas<br />

◦ Diplopia reported in all field of gaze, worse with sup and<br />

sup/left gaze.<br />

◦ Pain Rating 0/10 in all gazes<br />

10/12/11<br />

• VISUAL ACUITY:<br />

• Current Spec Rx & lens type: St 28, 3^bd Fresnel over RE<br />

• RE:+1.25-1.25*092 3^ BD 20/50 PH: 20/40<br />

• LE:+1.75-2.50*082 2^ BU 20/25+1<br />

• Add:2.25<br />

• Refraction:<br />

• Right:+0.75-2.00*092 20/25-2<br />

• COLOR VISION/RED CAP (RE%/LE%): Equal saturation<br />

• AMSLER GRID: No metamorphopsia in either eye<br />

• SLE:<br />

• LIDS, LASHES, ADNEXA: BE: 2-3+ edematous upper lids, 2+<br />

dermatochalasis, 2+ MG inspissation, scalloped lid margins, 1+ debris<br />

10/12/11<br />

10/12/11<br />

• TONOMETRY BY iCare:<br />

• straight ahead: 18/15<br />

• up: 21/18<br />

• left: 15/14<br />

• right: 17/13<br />

• Blood pressure 146/68 pulse measurement 68<br />

• Weight: 212.5 lbs<br />

• Exophthalmometry: 22/21 @ 110<br />

• Interpalpebral distance measured vertically:<br />

• straight ahead: 10/10 mm<br />

• up: 12/13 mm<br />

10/12/11 10/12/11<br />

Coursebook Page 106 of 139<br />

7


5/29/2012<br />

10/12/11 Posterior Pole<br />

WWVAMC 10/12/11<br />

Non-VA Physicians<br />

• ASSESSMENT(S):<br />

• 1) Graves Ophthalmopathy (Thyroid Eye Disease) with incomitant strabismus and<br />

• near constant diplopia, partially relieved by Fresnel prism. Veteran already<br />

• on ranitidine.<br />

• PLAN(S):<br />

• 1) Veteran is unable to withstand surgical management and steroid<br />

• immunosuppression is the best/only option - patient education. Before<br />

• prescribing prednisone, non-VA providers will be contacted for consensus on<br />

• treatment. 20 mg/day oral prednisone to be started for 1 week with patient<br />

• monitoring his blood pressure, pulse, and weight - with plan to increase to 40<br />

• mg/day if well-tolerated. Return to Walla Walla after 4 weeks of treatment;<br />

• fasting labs: Chem, UA, CBC.<br />

• PATIENT EDUCACTION:<br />

• Reviewed common side effects of Prednisone with patient and his spouse<br />

• including: osteoporosis, irritability/depression, and heartburn/GI tract<br />

• disorders. We also discussed the increased risk of exacerbation of<br />

• hypertension and congestive heart failure.<br />

• Pulmonology: Spokane<br />

• Cardiology: Spokane<br />

• Primary Care: Lewiston<br />

• All gave the okay for to start oral Prednisone.<br />

• Pulmonologist said if anything, it would help his<br />

pulmonary hypertension.<br />

• Everyone offered to help monitor for side effects and<br />

help with the taper when finished.<br />

How to prescribe Prednisone (Up-to-date) 18<br />

Started Prednisone<br />

• “The optimal dose of prednisone is uncertain. Some<br />

clinicians initiate therapy with a high dose, such as 100<br />

mg/day. However, doses of 30 to 40 mg/day appear to be<br />

as effective and have fewer side effects. Improvement<br />

usually occurs within four weeks. About one-half of<br />

patients have a good response to prednisone by the end<br />

of six months; those patients with less muscle swelling<br />

are more likely to respond [19]. However, given the many<br />

side effects of prolonged high-dose prednisone<br />

treatment, other treatments should be considered if the<br />

patient does not respond in four to six weeks. IF a good<br />

response occurs, the daily dose should be decreased to<br />

the lowest dose at which improvement is maintained.”<br />

• 10/18/11 20mg po once a day<br />

• 10/25/11 40mg po once a day<br />

Coursebook Page 107 of 139<br />

8


5/29/2012<br />

WWVAMC 11/21/11 – 1 month of treatment<br />

• REASON FOR EXAM//CC:<br />

• 77 yo WHITE MALE c Graves ophthalmopathy (Thyroid<br />

Eye Disease = TED) presents for follow up.<br />

• Vet reports that the double vision has gradually<br />

improved as he has taken the prednisone and that he<br />

feels his vision has cleared up a little bit. He feels the<br />

prednisone is helping. Vet reports that the right eye has<br />

become a little more fuzzy when looking through his<br />

glasses.<br />

• Vet reports no pain or irritation BE. No dryness or<br />

tearing or redness. Vet reports that sunlight is<br />

bothersome BE.<br />

11/21/11<br />

• EOMS: smooth pursuits. RE: sup restriction; LE:<br />

restricted sup/temp, sup, and sup/nas<br />

◦ With correction no diplopia straight ahead gaze or straight<br />

right or straight left, diplopia reported sup and inf gazes.<br />

◦ Pain Rating 0/10 in all gazes<br />

• Tried taking Fresnel prism off right lens - vet<br />

reported diplopia in straight ahead gaze as a<br />

"shadow trying to pull off the letters“<br />

• Amsler Grid:<br />

• RE: (-) scotoma, (-) metamorphopsia<br />

• LE: (-) scotoma, (-) metamorphopsia<br />

11/21/11<br />

11/21/11<br />

• Refraction:<br />

• Right: Plano-1.00*088 20/25-2 4^ base down<br />

• Left: +1.25-2.50*088 20/25 3^ base up<br />

• Vertical Vergences at distance and near: 7 right hyper<br />

• Vet reported single vision with 7^ BD RE, Diplopia with 6^<br />

BD<br />

• Adjustable Maddox Rod s correction:<br />

• Horizontal: 5-6 XP'<br />

• Vertical: 14 right hyper<br />

• SLE:<br />

◦ LIDS, LASHES, ADNEXA: BE: 2-3+ edematous upper lids, 2+ dermatochalasis, 2+ MG<br />

inspissation, scalloped lid margins, 1+ debris<br />

◦ CONJ: Tr ping N&T BE.<br />

• TONOMETRY BY iCare:<br />

• straight ahead: 21/18 @ 1319<br />

• up: 27/21<br />

• left: 20/21<br />

• right: 19/15<br />

• Blood pressure 153/59 pulse measurement 61<br />

• Weight: 210.1 lbs<br />

• Exophthalmometry: 21/20 @ 110<br />

• Interpalpebral distance measured vertically:<br />

• straight ahead: 09/09 mm<br />

• up: 07/09 mm<br />

11/21/11<br />

WWVAMC 11/21/11 – 1 month treatment<br />

• DFE: SLE: +78<br />

• DILATED PUPIL SIZE: 8 mm<br />

• LENS: BE PCIOL s/p YAG, clear and centered<br />

• VITREOUS: BE PVD and ant syneresis<br />

• OPTIC NERVE C/D RATIO: RE: 0.5/0.5v; LE:<br />

0.45/0.45v<br />

• MACULAE: BE Flat & dry. RE>LE pigment clumps/RPE<br />

changes, similar to photos 11/18/09<br />

• POSTERIOR POLE (vascular arcades to mid-periphery):<br />

intact BE<br />

• VESSELS: A:V = 2:3,mild crossing changes<br />

• ASSESSMENT(S):<br />

• 1) Graves Ophthalmopathy (Thyroid Eye Disease) with incomitant<br />

strabismus and<br />

• diplopia relieved by prism and dry eye.<br />

• 2) Mild dry macular degeneration, bilateral<br />

• 3) Pseduophakia, bilateral<br />

• 4) Glaucoma suspect due to large cup-to-disc ratios<br />

• 5) Bilateral posterior vitreous detachment<br />

• 6) Presbyopia, right eye simple myopic astigmatism, left eye mixed<br />

astigmatism<br />

Coursebook Page 108 of 139<br />

9


5/29/2012<br />

WWVAMC 11/21/11 – 1 month of Treatment<br />

WWVAMC 12/19/11 – 2 months treatment<br />

• PLAN(S):<br />

• 1) Veteran has noticed a decrease in the frequency of diplopia. No diplopia<br />

• noted with straight ahead gaze with the aid of prisms today, which is an<br />

• improvement from previous exam 10/12/11. Continue oral prednisone 40mg/day.<br />

• Veteran will continue to monitor his blood pressure, pulse, and weight. Continue<br />

• to use artificial tears four times a day as needed both eyes. Return<br />

• to Walla Walla clinic 12/19/11 for follow up appointment.<br />

• 2) Patient education. Continue to use Amsler grid at home to monitor for<br />

• distortion. Monitor.<br />

• 3)4)5) Patient education. Monitor.<br />

• 6) Continue to wear habitual spectacles with 3^ base down Fresnel prism on right<br />

• lens. Right eye prescription has changed. Will wait on new glasses since amount<br />

• of prism could change while on Prednisone. Final spectacle prescription today:<br />

• Right: Plano-1.00*088 20/25-2 4^ base down<br />

• Left: +1.25-2.50*088 20/25 3^ base up<br />

• 77 yo WHITE MALE c Graves ophthalmopathy<br />

presents for follow up appointment. Vet reports that<br />

his right eye is still a little blurry (has the Fresnel<br />

prism on it). Vet reports no diplopia with the glasses<br />

and Fresnel prism on.<br />

• Vet reports compliance taking oral Prednisone<br />

40mg/day.<br />

• Subjective Symptoms: Vet reports no pain or<br />

irritation BE. No dryness, tearing, or redness. Vet<br />

reports that sunlight is bothersome BE.<br />

12/19/11 – 2 mos treatment<br />

12/19/11<br />

• External Exam, Chair Skills, Slit Lamp<br />

◦ Improved periorbital edema BE<br />

◦ Tr-1+ diffuse SPK<br />

◦ Stable compared to previous exam<br />

• Refraction:<br />

• Right:Plano-1.25*088 20/30+1 6^ base down<br />

• Left: +1.25-2.25*088 20/25 6^ base up<br />

• Add: 2.50 20/25<br />

• BINOCULAR TESTING:<br />

• Horiz phoria @ distance: 3.5 BO<br />

• Vertical phoria @ distance: 15 left hypo<br />

• Horiz phoria @ near:<br />

• Vertical phoria @ near: 9 BI<br />

• Vertical phoria @ distance: 15 left hypo<br />

• Adjustable Maddox Rod s correction:<br />

• Horizontal: 5 XP'<br />

• Vertical: 14 right hyper<br />

12/19/11<br />

WWVAMC 12/19/11 – 2 mos treatment<br />

• TONOMETRY BY iCare:<br />

• straight ahead: 18/15 @ 1044<br />

• up: 23/18<br />

• left: 18/15<br />

• right: 17/16<br />

• Blood pressure 160/60 pulse measurement 69<br />

• Weight: 210.4 lbs<br />

• ASSESSMENT(S):<br />

• 1) Graves Ophthalmopathy (Thyroid Eye Disease)<br />

with incomitant strabismus and diplopia relieved by<br />

prism and dry eye.<br />

• 2) Presbyopia, right eye simple myopic astigmatism,<br />

left eye mixed astigmatism.<br />

• Exophthalmometry: 20/20 @ 110<br />

• Interpalpebral distance measured vertically:<br />

• straight ahead: 09/09 mm<br />

• up: 10/11 mm<br />

Coursebook Page 109 of 139<br />

10


5/29/2012<br />

WWVAMC 12/19/11 – 2 months treatment<br />

WWVAMC 01/24/12 – 3 months treatment<br />

• PLAN(S):<br />

• 1) Patient education. No apparent change in the level of diplopia. Eye comfort and edema of<br />

upper lids have both improved since oral predisone therapy began 2 months ago. Continue to<br />

take one 20mg tablet of prednisone by mouth twice a day. If no improvement of diplopia is<br />

noted at next exam we will discuss tapering off the prednisone. Continue to use Refresh Plus<br />

artificial tears four times a day as needed, and ocular lubricant ointment once at night both<br />

eyes. Veteran will call if any changes in vision or overall health. Monitor in one month.<br />

• 2) Patient picked out a new frame today to use in case new lenses are ordered with prism<br />

ground in at a future date. Veteran did not report any diplopia when the Fresnel prism was<br />

removed from the right spectacle lens. The right spectacle lens in over-plussed, which causes<br />

the patient to use his left eye for the majority of his vision, thereby, reducing the symptoms of<br />

double vision. Fresnel prism was cleaned and placed in an envelope for Mr. Parks, so he can reapply<br />

it if needed at a future date. Continue to use habitual prescription, full-time wear. Final<br />

spectacle prescription today:<br />

Right:Plano-1.25*088 20/30+1 6^ base down<br />

Left: +1.25-2.25*088 20/25 6^ base up<br />

Add: 2.50<br />

• REASON FOR EXAM//CC:<br />

• 77 yo WHITE MALE c Graves ophthalmopathy presents<br />

for follow up appointment. Vet reports that his right eye<br />

is still a little blurry (has the Fresnel prism on it). Vet<br />

reports no diplopia with the glasses and Fresnel prism<br />

on. Vet reports that he did try using the glasses without<br />

the Fresnel prism, but experienced diplopia without it.<br />

• Vet reports compliance taking oral Prednisone<br />

40mg/day.<br />

• Subjective Symptoms: Vet reports no pain or irritation<br />

BE. No dryness or tearing or redness. Vet reports that<br />

sunlight is bothersome BE.<br />

01/24/12 – 3 mos treatment<br />

01/24/12<br />

• External Exam, Chair Skills, Slit Lamp<br />

◦ Improved periorbital edema BE<br />

◦ Tr-1+ diffuse SPK BE<br />

◦ Stable compared to previous exam<br />

• Refraction:<br />

• Right:Plano-1.25*090 20/30+2 6^ base down<br />

• Left: +1.00-2.00*095 20/25 6^ base up<br />

• Add: 2.50 20/25<br />

• Trial Frame: had patient wear this prescription for 10-15 minutes as he walked<br />

• around the clinic and tried reading. Mr. Parks reported comfortable, clear,<br />

• single vision.<br />

• BINOCULAR TESTING:<br />

• Horiz phoria @ distance: 3 BO<br />

• Vertical phoria @ distance: 15-16 left hypo<br />

• Horiz phoria @ near:<br />

• Vertical phoria @ near: 6-7 BI<br />

• Vertical phoria @ distance: 13-14 left hypo<br />

• Adjustable Maddox Rod s correction:<br />

• Horizontal: 4 XP'<br />

• Vertical: 14 right hyper<br />

01/24/12<br />

WWVAMC 01/24/12 – 3 mos treatment<br />

• TONOMETRY BY Tpen:<br />

• straight ahead: 25/24 @ 1012<br />

• up: 28/24<br />

• left: 26/25<br />

• right: 25/24<br />

• Blood pressure 159/75 pulse measurement 71<br />

• Weight: 216.5 lbs<br />

• Exophthalmometry: 21/20 @ 110<br />

• ASSESSMENT(S):<br />

• 1) Graves Ophthalmopathy (Thyroid Eye Disease)<br />

with incomitant strabismus and diplopia relieved by<br />

prism and dry eye.<br />

• 2) Presbyopia, right eye simple myopic astigmatism,<br />

left eye mixed astigmatism<br />

• Interpalpebral distance measured vertically:<br />

• straight ahead: 09/09 mm<br />

• up: 11/13 mm<br />

Coursebook Page 110 of 139<br />

11


5/29/2012<br />

WWVAMC 01/24/12 – 3 mos treatment<br />

Telephone Visits – 4 mos treat, 1 mo of taper<br />

• PLAN(S):<br />

• 1) Patient education. No apparent change in the level of diplopia. Eye<br />

• comfort and edema of upper lids have both improved since oral predisone therapy<br />

• began 3 months ago. Start taper of oral prednisone. Reduce from 40mg to 30mg for<br />

• one month. Called Mr. Parks primary care physician, Dr. Celso Chavez, who will<br />

• then see Mr. Parks for follow up to reduce travel for veteran. Then reduce to<br />

• 20mg for one month. Return to eye clinic in 2 months for follow up with<br />

• tonometry. Continue to use Refresh Plus artificial tears four times a day as<br />

• needed, and ocular lubricant ointment once at night both eyes. Veteran will call<br />

• if any changes in vision or overall health.<br />

• 2) Order final spectacle prescription full-time wear with high-index transition<br />

• lenses (thyroid eye disease), a rush put on the order:<br />

• Right:Plano-1.25*090 20/30+2 6^ base down<br />

• Left: +1.00-2.00*095 20/25 6^ base up<br />

• Add: 2.50 20/25<br />

• PATIENT EDUCATION:<br />

• Reviewed common side effects of Prednisone with patient including: osteoporosis,<br />

• irritability/depression, and heartburn/GI tract disorders. We also discussed the<br />

• increased risk of exacerbation of hypertension and congestive heart failure.<br />

• 02/28/11: I called veteran to see how he was doing on. He was<br />

not home, but I spoke with his wife who said he was doing<br />

well, but still waiting for his glasses.<br />

• 03/01/11: I received a phone message from veteran saying<br />

that he was in the hospital and wanted to talk with me about<br />

the glasses that were ordered.<br />

• 03/02/11: Veteran reported that he felt dizzy and passed out<br />

on Wednesday of this week. He was getting ready to be<br />

discharged from the hospital when I was speaking with him<br />

on the phone. Veteran reports that the doctors told him that<br />

he was low on oxygen, and they think that may be why he<br />

passed out. He has increased his oxygen to a 7 or 8.<br />

03/02/12 Telephone<br />

03/14/12 Telephone<br />

• Veteran reports that he is doing well the the prednisone<br />

taper, and that his primary care physician has been<br />

seeing him and ensuring that the taper is going well.<br />

Veteran is currently down to 20mg a day and is<br />

scheduled to reduce to 10mg a day starting March 24th.<br />

• Veteran has an appointment scheduled at the eye clinic<br />

on March 20th. He reported that he was not sure if he<br />

would be up to traveling yet by that time. I told him to<br />

call and let me know. If he can't make it, we can continue<br />

to work with his PCP with his follow ups concerning the<br />

tapering of the Prednisone.<br />

• Veteran at nursing home to help with recovery.<br />

• Veteran reports compliance with the taper of the Prednisone.<br />

He will continue to take 20mg once a day until March 24th.<br />

He will then start taking 10mg once a day until April 24 th .<br />

• Veteran reports he needs a prescription written out for<br />

Prednisone so the nursing home can continue to give it to<br />

him.<br />

• I suggested that veteran speak with his private primary care<br />

doctor who signed the paperwork needed to stay at the<br />

nursing home to see if he could provide the prescription.<br />

Veteran spoke with his PCP and reports he was able to provide<br />

the prescription.<br />

04/12/12 – 6 mos treatment, 3 mos taper<br />

04/12/12<br />

• 77 yo MALE c Graves ophthalmopathy presents for follow up<br />

appointment.<br />

• Vet received his new glasses yesterday and reports that he can<br />

see much better with them. No diplopia and clearer vision<br />

with the spectacles.<br />

• Current ocular medications:<br />

◦ Refresh AT q2-4 hrs BE<br />

◦ Ocular lubricant at night BE<br />

◦ Prednisone 10mg po qd.<br />

• Veteran is using a battery operated 4-wheel scooter that he<br />

said has greatly improved his independence and mobility and<br />

allows him to enjoy being outdoors again. Doctors<br />

discontinued Sildenafil.<br />

• Subjective Symptoms: Veteran reports no pain or irritation<br />

BE. Veteran reports that his eye do not feel as puffy and that<br />

they do not feel dry.<br />

Coursebook Page 111 of 139<br />

12


5/29/2012<br />

• VISUAL ACUITY:<br />

04/12/12<br />

• Current Spec Rx & lens type: ST 28<br />

• Right:Plano-1.25*090 20/30 6^ base down<br />

• Left: +1.00-2.00*095 20/30 6^ base up<br />

• Add: 2.50 20/25<br />

04/12/12<br />

• External Exam: Negative for head tilt/turn, ptosis, abnormal<br />

symmetry, skin disorders.<br />

• PERRL(-)APD: 5-3, 2+ RL<br />

• EOMS:LE restricted sup/temp, RE restricted inf, (+) diplopia<br />

sup/temp and inf gazes, Pain Rating 0/10 in all gazes.<br />

• Cover Test cc: Distance: ortho<br />

• Near: 3-4 exo<br />

• Confrontation VF: Full to finger counting<br />

• AMSLER GRID: No metamorphopsia in either eye<br />

• Adjustable Maddox Rod c correction:<br />

• Horizontal: ortho<br />

• Vertical: ortho<br />

04/12/12<br />

• Blood pressure: 114/66 Pulse: 80<br />

• Weight: 211.1 lbs<br />

• Exophthalmometry: 19/19 @ 110<br />

◦ (22/21 @ 110 on 09/09/11)<br />

•<br />

• Interpalpebral distance measured vertically:<br />

• straight ahead: 10/10 mm<br />

◦ Right eye hyper, lid at upper part of non-dilated pupil, left eye lid<br />

2mm above upper edge of non-dilated pupil.<br />

• up: 14/14 mm<br />

04/12/12<br />

• SLE:<br />

• LIDS, LASHES, ADNEXA: RE: 1+ edematous upper lid;<br />

LE: 1+ edematous upper lid; BE<br />

• 1+ dermatochalasis, 1+ MG inspissation, scalloped lid<br />

margins<br />

• CONJ: Tr ping N&T BE.<br />

• CORNEA: Tr-1+ arcus 360 BE, Tr diffuse SPK cent to inf<br />

BE<br />

• A/C: Deep & quiet without cell or flare<br />

• IRIS: Normal, without NVI<br />

• LENS: BE: PCIOL centered, s/p YAG<br />

• Tears: Mid volume with breakup time >10 sec BE<br />

04/12/12<br />

04/12/12<br />

• TONOMETRY BY Tpen:<br />

• straight ahead: 15/13 @ 0934<br />

• up: 20/14<br />

• left: 15/15<br />

• right: 15/14<br />

• down: 17/17<br />

• DFE: SLE: +78<br />

• Stable compared to previous exams.<br />

• (-) optic neuropathy<br />

Coursebook Page 112 of 139<br />

13


5/29/2012<br />

04/12/12, 6 mos treatment, 3 mos taper<br />

• ASSESSMENT:<br />

• 1) Graves Ophthalmopathy (Thyroid Eye Disease) with<br />

dry eye, incomitant strabismus, and diplopia relieved by<br />

prism.<br />

• PLAN:<br />

• 1) Discussed that diplopia is stable and veteran reports<br />

that he feels better and that new spectacles are working<br />

great. Eye comfort and edema of upper lids have both<br />

improved since oral prednisone therapy began. Continue<br />

to taper prednisone. Continue to use Refresh Plus<br />

artificial tears four times a day as needed, and ocular<br />

lubricant ointment once at night both eyes. Veteran will<br />

call if any changes in vision or overall health. Monitor.<br />

Taper Schedule<br />

• 4/24 - 5/14 7.5 mg daily (3 weeks)<br />

• 5/15 - 6/04 5.0 mg daily (3 weeks)<br />

• 6/11 - 6/24 4 mg daily (2 weeks)<br />

• 6/25 - 7/08 3 mg daily (2 weeks)<br />

• 7/09 - 7/22 2 mg daily (2 weeks)<br />

• 7/23 - 7/30 1.5 mg daily (1 week)<br />

• 7/30 - 8/06 1 mg daily (1 week)<br />

• 8/07 - 8/13 0.5 mg daily (1 week)<br />

• 8/14, 8/16, 8/18 0.5 mg every other day for 3 doses<br />

then stop<br />

Goals<br />

04/12/12<br />

9/9/11 10/13 10/18 11/21 12/19 1/24/12 4/12/12<br />

Proptosis 22/21 22/21 Start 21/20 20/20 21/20 19/19<br />

Tx<br />

Prism 8^ 8^ 7^ 12^ 12^ 12^<br />

Reduce<br />

Periorbit<br />

al Edema<br />

See<br />

photos<br />

04/12/12 04/12/12<br />

Coursebook Page 113 of 139<br />

14


5/29/2012<br />

04/12/12 Reduction in edema around eyes<br />

10/12/11 04/12/12<br />

Radioiodine in the treatment of Hyperthyroidism<br />

Risk of worsening or new onset ophthalmopathy<br />

• 69% of North American thyroid specialists chose<br />

radioiodine for a hypothetical patient with Graves’<br />

hyperthyroidism in a survey from 1990 1 .<br />

• There is increasing evidence that radioiodine<br />

therapy can cause the development or worsening of<br />

Graves’ ophthalmopathy more often than antithyroid<br />

drug therapy or surgery.<br />

TRIAL<br />

Radio<br />

iodine<br />

Methi<br />

mazole<br />

Surg<br />

ery<br />

Radio + Pred (3 mos) n New<br />

Onset<br />

Tallstedt 2 33% 10% 16% 168 13%<br />

Traisk 3 39% 21% 313 24%<br />

Bartalena 4 15% 4% 0% + 67% of patients who 443<br />

already had<br />

ophthalmopathy<br />

improved.<br />

Ponto 5 20% 5%<br />

Radioiodine in the treatment of Hyperthyroidism<br />

Lower vs. higher doses of Radioiodine<br />

• In patients with initially mild ophthalmopathy,<br />

worsening after radioiodine therapy may be prevented by<br />

the concurrent administration of glucocorticoids 4 .<br />

• An alternative option for patients with moderate to<br />

severe eye disease is to delay treatment with radioiodine<br />

until the eye disease has been stable for at least one<br />

year 6 .<br />

• In addition, radioiodine should be used with caution in<br />

patients with risk factors for ophthalmopathy, including<br />

smoking, or a high baseline serum concentration of<br />

triiodothyronine 6 .<br />

• Patients are left hypothyroid and supplements such<br />

as Levothyroxine are then used after Radioiodine<br />

therapy. Why not try to leave patients euthyroid after<br />

Radioiodine treatment<br />

◦ 1. Low-dose radioiodine therapy is more likely to result in<br />

treatment failure, necessitating another dose in 6 to 24<br />

months 7,8 .<br />

◦ 2. Less than one-third of patients are euthyroid 10 years after<br />

therapy 9 .<br />

◦ 3. Many patients have chronic subclinical hyperthyroidism,<br />

with its associated risks of atrial fibrillation and reduced bone<br />

density.<br />

Coursebook Page 114 of 139<br />

15


5/29/2012<br />

Graves’ Ophthalmopathy Review<br />

Graves’ Ophthalmopathy Review<br />

• Thyroid eye disease is a heterogeneous autoimmune<br />

orbital reaction 10 .<br />

• The overwhelming majority (90%) of thyroid eye<br />

disease cases are associated with hyperthyroidism,<br />

while the rest are either euthyroid or hypothyroid 11 .<br />

• Approximately half of Graves’ disease patients<br />

experience ophthalmic manifestations, with sightthreatening<br />

disease in 3% to 5% of cases 12 .<br />

• It is the most common orbital disorder in adults 13 .<br />

• Different terms:<br />

◦ Graves’ orbitopathy<br />

◦ Thyroid-associated ophthalmopathy<br />

◦ Thyroid-related ophthalmopathy<br />

◦ Graves’ ophthalmopathy<br />

◦ Thyroid eye disease<br />

◦ Thyroid orbitopathy<br />

◦ Endocrine exophthalmos<br />

◦ Malignant exophthalmos<br />

◦ Infiltrative ophthalmopathy<br />

Risk Factors<br />

Risk Factors<br />

• 1. Hyperthyroidism<br />

◦ The highest risk factor, although there is a subset of patients<br />

who are euthyroid or hypothryroid 11 .<br />

• 2. Smoking<br />

◦ Once a patient has Grave’s disease, the major clinical risk<br />

factor for developing thyroid eye disease is smoking 14 .<br />

◦ Patients with thyroid eye disease are four times more likely to<br />

be smokers or former smokers than never smokers 14 .<br />

◦ The greater the number of cigarettes smoked per day, the<br />

greater the risk 15 .<br />

◦ Also increases the risk for progression of ophthalmopathy after<br />

radioiodine therapy 16 .<br />

• 3. Sex<br />

◦ Women are five to eight times more likely to be affected by<br />

thyroid eye disease than men, but this largely reflects the<br />

increased incidence of Graves’ disease in women 15,19 .<br />

◦ Once someone has Graves’ disease, his or her sex has little<br />

effect on the risk 15 .<br />

◦ Men older than 60 may be at increased risk may be more<br />

severe disease 17 .<br />

• 4. Radioiodine<br />

Risk Factors<br />

Graves’ Ophthalmopathy Review<br />

• 5. Genetics<br />

◦ Multiple genes are likely to be involved in the development of<br />

thyroid eye diseases, and these interact with multiple<br />

environmental risk factors 15 .<br />

◦ An immunological predisposition is likely based on the<br />

increased incidence in certain HLA (DR, B8, and DW) types<br />

and recent genetic mapping of loci for Graves’ disease in some<br />

patients to chromosome 14 11 .<br />

This genetic localization to chromosome 14 is in the area of the<br />

gene for the TSH receptor, but to date no mapping to the area of<br />

the HLA region has been found 11 .<br />

• Possible Symptoms 19 :<br />

◦ Red eye<br />

◦ Foreign-body sensation<br />

◦ Tearing<br />

◦ Decreased vision<br />

◦ Dyschromatopsia<br />

◦ Binocular diplopia<br />

◦ Prominent (“bulging”) eyes<br />

Coursebook Page 115 of 139<br />

16


5/29/2012<br />

Graves’ Ophthalmopathy Review<br />

Graves’ Ophthalmopathy Review<br />

• Signs 19 :<br />

◦ Eyelid retraction<br />

◦ Edema<br />

◦ Lagophthalmos<br />

◦ Lid lag (von Graefe’s sign)<br />

◦ Reduced blinking<br />

◦ Superficial keratopathy<br />

◦ Conjunctival injection<br />

◦ Exophthalmos<br />

◦ Limitation of extraocular movements<br />

Supraduction most common reflecting inferior rectus involvement<br />

• Signs 19 :<br />

◦ Positive forced ductions<br />

◦ Resistance to retropulsion of globe<br />

◦ Decreased visual acuity<br />

◦ Decreased color vision<br />

◦ Relative afferent papillary defect<br />

◦ Visual field defect<br />

◦ Acute congestion of the socket and periocular tissues<br />

Graves’ Ophthalmopathy Review<br />

Graves’ Ophthalmopathy Review<br />

• Werner Classification of Eye Findings 19 :<br />

◦ No signs or symptoms.<br />

◦ Only signs.<br />

◦ Soft tissue involvement (signs and symptoms).<br />

◦ Proptosis.<br />

◦ Extraocular muscle involvement.<br />

◦ Corneal involvement.<br />

◦ Sight loss (optic nerve compression).<br />

• American Thyroid Association Grading System 20 :<br />

◦ Class I<br />

Solely involves lid retraction and stare<br />

◦ Class II<br />

Soft tissue symptoms and signs (chemosis/edema)<br />

◦ Class III<br />

Proptosis<br />

◦ Class IV<br />

Decreased motility and/or diplopia<br />

◦ Class V and Class VI<br />

Corneal exposure symptoms/signs<br />

◦ Class VI<br />

Optic neuropathy<br />

Treatment of Graves’ Orbitopathy<br />

Treatment of Graves’ Orbitopathy<br />

• Treatment of patients has 3 components:<br />

◦ Reversal of hyperthyroidism, if present<br />

◦ Symptomatic treatment<br />

◦ Treatment with a glucocorticoid, and/or orbital irradiation,<br />

and/or orbital decompression surgery to reduce inflammation<br />

in the periorbital tissues.<br />

• Symptomatic Treatment<br />

◦ Sunglasses<br />

◦ Prisms for diplopia<br />

◦ Artificial Tears and Ointments<br />

◦ Lid taping or moisture chamber goggles at nighttime<br />

Wiley X sunglasses with gasket.<br />

◦ Punctal occlusion<br />

◦ Avoid “dry eye environments”<br />

◦ Avoid sleeping on face<br />

◦ Raising the head of the bed at night<br />

◦ Cold packs<br />

◦ Smokers should stop smoking<br />

◦ Selenium 100mcg twice daily 18<br />

Coursebook Page 116 of 139<br />

17


5/29/2012<br />

Selenium 21<br />

Treatment of Graves’ Orbitopathy<br />

• “Graves' disease (GD) and ophthalmopathy (GO) are<br />

organ-specific autoimmune-inflammatory disorders<br />

characterized by a complex pathogenesis.<br />

• The inflammatory process is dominated by an imbalance<br />

of the antioxidant-oxidant mechanism, increased<br />

production of radical oxygen species (ROS), and<br />

cytokines which sustain the autoimmune process and<br />

perpetuate the disease.<br />

• Recently, selenium, which is a powerful antioxidant, has<br />

been successfully applied in patients with mild GO,<br />

slowing the progression of disease, decreasing the clinical<br />

activity score, and appreciably improving the quality of<br />

life.”<br />

• Glucocorticoid Therapy<br />

◦ Primary treatment for moderate to severe Graves’<br />

◦ Oral<br />

◦ Intravenous<br />

◦ Retrobulbar or subconjunctival injections have been found to<br />

be less effective, but can be used if oral or intravenous routes<br />

are contraindicated 20 .<br />

◦ Should monitor liver function and watch for possible side<br />

effects such as hyperglycemia and increased blood pressure.<br />

Contraindications and possible side effects of<br />

Prednisone from Micromedex.<br />

Contraindications and possible side effects of<br />

Prednisone from Micromedex.<br />

• Common<br />

• Cardiovascular:<br />

• Hypertension<br />

◦ All corticosteroids cause sodium retention which results in FLUID RETENTION.<br />

◦ Older patients or those with a history of hypertension are more likely to develop HIGH BLOOD<br />

PRESSURE during treatment with corticosteroids.<br />

• Dermatologic:<br />

• Acne, Ecchymosis, Atrophic condition of skin, Impaired healing.<br />

• Endocrine metabolic:<br />

• Body fluid retention, Decreased body growth, Hypernatremia<br />

• Gastrointestinal:<br />

• Gastrointestinal perforation, Gastrointestinal ulcer, Pancreatitis, Superinfection<br />

• Immunologic:<br />

• Superinfection: At higher risk for infection<br />

• Musculoskeletal: Osteoporosis<br />

• Psychiatric: Depression, Euphoria<br />

• -Serious<br />

• Endocrine metabolic:<br />

• Cushing's syndrome, Hyperglycemia, Primary<br />

adrenocortical insufficiency<br />

• Ophthalmic:<br />

• Cataract (2.5-60% incidence), Glaucoma (more likely<br />

after 1 year or more of therapy), increased IOP (decreases<br />

the outflow), central serous retinopathy, optic nerve<br />

damage<br />

• Respiratory:<br />

• Pulmonary tuberculosis, abscess of lung, aspergillosis,<br />

interstitial pneumonia, pulmonary nocardiosis.<br />

Prednisone Possible Drug Interactions<br />

Prednisone Possible Drug Interactions<br />

• Acenocoumarol<br />

Alatrofloxacin<br />

Alcuronium<br />

Aldesleukin<br />

Alfalfa<br />

Amobarbital<br />

Amphotericin B Liposome<br />

Anthrax Vaccine Adsorbed<br />

Aprobarbital<br />

Asparaginase<br />

Aspirin<br />

Atracurium<br />

Bacillus of Calmette and Guerin Vaccine,<br />

Live<br />

Balofloxacin<br />

Bupropion<br />

Butabarbital<br />

Butalbital<br />

Carbamazepine<br />

Cinoxacin<br />

Ciprofloxacin<br />

Cisatracurium<br />

Clarithromycin<br />

Clinafloxacin<br />

• Cyclosporine<br />

Desogestrel<br />

Dicumarol<br />

Dienogest<br />

Diphtheria Toxoid, Adsorbed<br />

Doxacurium<br />

Drospirenone<br />

Echinacea<br />

Enoxacin<br />

Estradiol Cypionate<br />

Estradiol Valerate<br />

Ethinyl Estradiol<br />

Ethynodiol Diacetate<br />

Etonogestrel<br />

Fleroxacin<br />

Fluconazole<br />

Fluindione<br />

Flumequine<br />

Fosphenytoin<br />

Gallamine<br />

Gatifloxacin<br />

Gemifloxacin<br />

Grepafloxacin<br />

Haemophilus B Vaccine<br />

• Hepatitis A Vaccine, Inactivated<br />

Hexafluorenium<br />

Hydrochlorothiazide<br />

Indinavir<br />

Influenza Virus Vaccine<br />

Isoniazid<br />

Itraconazole<br />

Ketoconazole<br />

Levofloxacin<br />

Levonorgestrel<br />

Licorice<br />

Lomefloxacin<br />

Lyme Disease Vaccine (Recombinant<br />

OspA)<br />

Ma Huang<br />

Measles Virus Vaccine, Live<br />

Medroxyprogesterone Acetate<br />

Meningococcal Vaccine<br />

Mephobarbital<br />

Mestranol<br />

Metocurine<br />

• Mivacurium<br />

Montelukast<br />

Moxifloxacin<br />

Mumps Virus Vaccine, Live<br />

Nateglinide<br />

Neostigmine<br />

Nimodipine<br />

Norelgestromin<br />

Norethindrone<br />

Norfloxacin<br />

Norgestimate<br />

Norgestrel<br />

Ofloxacin<br />

Pancuronium<br />

Pefloxacin<br />

Pentobarbital<br />

Pertussis Vaccine<br />

Phenobarbital<br />

Phenprocoumon<br />

Phenytoin<br />

Pipecuronium<br />

Plague Vaccine<br />

Coursebook Page 117 of 139<br />

18


5/29/2012<br />

Prednisone Possible Drug Interactions<br />

Warfarin/Aspirin (Micromedex)<br />

• Pneumococcal Vaccine, Diphtheria<br />

Conjugate<br />

Pneumococcal Vaccine Polyvalent<br />

Poliovirus Vaccine, Live<br />

Primidone<br />

Prulifloxacin<br />

Pyridostigmine<br />

Quetiapine<br />

Rabies Vaccine<br />

Rifampin<br />

Rifapentine<br />

Ritonavir<br />

Rocuronium<br />

Rosoxacin<br />

Rotavirus Vaccine, Live<br />

Rubella Virus Vaccine, Live<br />

Rufloxacin<br />

Saiboku-To<br />

• Secobarbital<br />

Smallpox Vaccine<br />

Somatropin<br />

Sparfloxacin<br />

Succinylcholine<br />

Telaprevir<br />

Temafloxacin<br />

Tetanus Toxoid<br />

Tosufloxacin<br />

Tretinoin<br />

Trovafloxacin Mesylate<br />

Tuberculin<br />

Tubocurarine<br />

Typhoid Vaccine<br />

Varicella Virus Vaccine<br />

Vecuronium<br />

Warfarin<br />

Yellow Fever Vaccine<br />

• “Summary: The concomitant use of corticosteroids<br />

and anticoagulants has been associated with both<br />

enhanced and diminished anticoagulant effects.<br />

Monitoring of coagulation indices is recommended<br />

when prednisone is co-administered with an<br />

anticoagulant, such as warfarin.”<br />

Treatment of Graves’ Orbitopathy<br />

Treatment of Graves’ Orbitopathy<br />

• External orbital radiation<br />

◦ The role of orbital radiotherapy is controversial 15 .<br />

◦ Effective in up to 70% of patients 11 .<br />

◦ Has been used in the treatment of Graves’ Orbitopathy for more than<br />

90 years 20 .<br />

◦ Used for anti-inflammatory effects and radiosensitivity of activated<br />

orbital T-cells and fibroblasts 20 .<br />

◦ A common cumulative dose of radiation is 20 Gy per eye,<br />

fractionated over a 2-week period 20 .<br />

◦ Known complications are fortunately rare, but may include radiation<br />

retinopathy and cataract 20 .<br />

◦ Also theoretic concerns of cancer induction which is estimated at<br />

0.39% 20 .<br />

◦ Can be used as adjunct to steroids, decompression, or both for<br />

recalcitrant disease 20 .<br />

◦ Contraindicated in diabetic patients with pre-existing retin0pathy 15 .<br />

• Surgical interventions are deferred until a 9-12 month<br />

stable interval is recorded, except in cases of optic<br />

neuropathy or extreme proptosis causing severe<br />

exposure keratopathy 19 .<br />

• Surgery (order is stepwise posterior to anterior):<br />

◦ Orbital decompression surgery<br />

Traditional indications for decompression involved predominantly<br />

optic neuropathy and severe exposure keratopathy 10 .<br />

◦ Fat decompression surgery<br />

Removal of intraconal fat reduces congestive orbitopathy, proptosis,<br />

and may improve preoperative diplopia 10 .<br />

◦ Strabismus surgery<br />

◦ Eyelid reconstruction as indicated<br />

Optic Neuropathy 19<br />

Treatment of Graves’ Orbitopathy<br />

• “Immediate treatment with oral steroids (prednisone<br />

100mg po qd for 2-14 days).<br />

• The use of external beam irradiation (15-30Gy) is<br />

controversial and falling out of favor.<br />

• Orbital decompression for compressive optic<br />

neuropathy should be performed by an oculplastic<br />

surgeon. A balanced approach with decompression<br />

of the medial and lateral orbital walls is most<br />

commonly employed. Removal of the inferior wall is<br />

avoided if possible due to higher incidence of<br />

induced diplopia.”<br />

• Rituximab 18<br />

◦ A number of reports have indicated that some patients with<br />

severe GO may respond dramatically to B cell depletion<br />

induced by Rituximab, which is a monoclonal antibody<br />

directed against the B cell CD20 molecule.<br />

◦ Rituximab induces a fall in TSH receptor antibody levels and<br />

depletion of B cells in the retro orbital tissues, not just the<br />

periphery.<br />

◦ Currently undergoing larger trials; preliminary results from<br />

these trials suggest efficacy in some, but not all, patients.<br />

◦ Used in cases of lymphomas, leukemia, transplant rejection<br />

and some autoimmune disorders.<br />

Coursebook Page 118 of 139<br />

19


5/29/2012<br />

Treatment of Graves’ Orbitopathy<br />

Prognosis 19<br />

• Somatostatin analogs 18<br />

◦ “Have been explored as potential therapy for GO, based upon<br />

the observations that orbital fibroblasts have somatostatin<br />

receptors and the activity of orbitopathy correlates with<br />

activity on octreotide scintigrams.”<br />

• “Diplopia and ocular surface disease are common;<br />

6% develop optic nerve disease. Despite surgical<br />

rehabilitation, which may require multiple<br />

procedures, patients are often left with functional<br />

and cosmetic defects.”<br />

Quality of Life and Occupational Disability in<br />

Endocrine Orbitopathy<br />

Quality of Life and Occupational Disability in<br />

Endocrine Orbitopathy<br />

• Background<br />

◦ “In endocrine orbitopathy (EO), disfiguring proptosis and<br />

diplopia impair patients quality of life both at home and at<br />

work.”<br />

• Methods<br />

◦ “From late 2006 to the beginning of 2008, 250 outpatients in<br />

an interdisciplinary thyroid and eye clinic filled out a<br />

questionnaire about their quality of life, occupational<br />

disability, and use of psychotherapy. 400 physicians who<br />

referred their EO patients to the clinic also participated in a<br />

survey on these issues.”<br />

• Patient Results<br />

◦ 45% of the patients complained of restrictions in their daily<br />

activities.<br />

◦ 38% reported impaired self-perception.<br />

◦ 36% were on sick leave because of EO.<br />

◦ 28% were disabled.<br />

◦ 5% had retired early.<br />

◦ 3% had lost their jobs.<br />

◦ 21% underwent psychotherapy.<br />

Quality of Life and Occupational Disability in<br />

Endocrine Orbitopathy<br />

Co-management Tips<br />

• Physician results<br />

◦ 75% stated that they were taking care of temporarily disabled<br />

patients.<br />

◦ 34% stated that they were taking care of permanently disabled<br />

patients.<br />

◦ 38% stated that they were treating EO patients who were<br />

undergoing psychotherapy.<br />

• Golden Rule: “Do unto others as you would have<br />

them do unto you.”<br />

• Take the time to fully understand the case and<br />

prepare for questions the other health care<br />

professional might ask.<br />

• Have the patient’s chart with you during all<br />

communication with others.<br />

• Always look for opportunities to learn something<br />

new and build relationships with others.<br />

Coursebook Page 119 of 139<br />

20


5/29/2012<br />

Sources<br />

Sources<br />

• 1. Wartofsky L, Glinoer D, Solomon B, et al. Differences and<br />

similarities in the diagnosis and treatment of Graves’ disease<br />

in Europe, Japan, and the United States. Thyroid 1991; 1:129.<br />

• 2. Tallstedt L, Lundell G, Torring O, et al. Occurrence of<br />

ophthalmopathy after treatment for Graves’ hyperthyroidism.<br />

The Thyroid Study Group. N Engl J Med 1992; 326:1733.<br />

• 3. Traisk F, Tallstedt L, Abraham-Nordling M, et al. Thyroidassociated<br />

ophthalmopathy after treatment of Graves’<br />

hyperthyroidism with antithyroid drugs or iodine-131. J Clin<br />

Endocrinol Metab 2009; 94:3700.<br />

• 4. Bartalena L, Marcocci C, Bogazzi F, et al. Relation between<br />

therapy for hyperthyroidism and the course of Graves’<br />

ophthalmopathy. N Engl J Med 1998; 338:73.<br />

• 5. Ponto KA, Zang S, Kahaly GJ. The tale of radioiodine and<br />

Graves’ orbitopathy. Thyroid 2010 Jul; 20(7):785-93.<br />

• 6. Mariotti S, Martino E, Francesconi M, et al. Serum thyroid<br />

autoantibodies as a risk factor for development of<br />

hypothyroidism after radioactive iodine therapy for single<br />

thyroid ‘hot’ nodule. Acta Endocrinol (Copenh) 1986; 113:500.<br />

• 7. Rapoport B, Caplan R, DeGroot LJ. Low-dose sodium<br />

iodide I 131 therapy in Graves disease. JAMA 1973; 224:1610.<br />

• 8. Goolden AW, Stewart JS. Long-term results from graded<br />

low dose radioactive iodine therapy for thyrotoxicosis. Clin<br />

Endocrinol (Oxf) 1986; 24:217.<br />

• 9. Sridama V, McCormick M, Kaplan EL, et al. Long-term<br />

follow-up study of compensated low-dose 131I therapy for<br />

Graves’ disease. N Engl J Med 1984; 311:426.<br />

Sources<br />

Sources<br />

• 10. Bothun, ED, Scheurer RA, Harrison AR, et al. Update<br />

on thyroid eye disease and management. Clinical<br />

Ophthalmology 2009; 3:543-51.<br />

• 11. Burch HB, Wartofsky L. Graves’ ophthalmopathy:<br />

current concepts regarding pathogenesis and<br />

management. Endocr Rev. 1993; 14(6):747-93.<br />

• 11. Liu, GT, Volpe NJ, Galetta SL. Thyroid-associated<br />

ophthalmopathy. Neuro-ophthalmopathy: <strong>Diagnosis</strong><br />

and Mangement. Philadelphia: Saunders, 2001. 661-72.<br />

Print.<br />

• 12. Bartalena L, Pinchera A, Marcocci C. Management of<br />

Graves’ ophthalmopathy: reality and perspectives.<br />

Endocr Rev 2000;21(2):168-99.<br />

• 13. Ponto KA, Pitz S, Pfeiffer N, et al. Quality of life and<br />

occupational disability in endocrine orbitopathy. Dtsch<br />

Arztebl Int 2009; 106(17):283-9.<br />

• 14. Vestergaard, P. Smoking and thyroid disorders—a<br />

meta-analysis. Eur J Endocrinol 2002; 146:153-61.<br />

• 15. Cawood T, Moriarty P, O’Shea D. Recent<br />

developments in thyroid eye disease. BMJ 2004;<br />

329:385-90.<br />

• 16. Bartalena L, Marcocci C, Tanda ML, et al. Cigarette<br />

smoking and tretment outcomes in Graves<br />

ophthalmopathy. Ann Intern Med 1998; 129:632-5.<br />

Sources<br />

• 17. Perros P, Crombie AL, Matthews JN, Kendall-Taylor P. Age and<br />

gender influence the severity of thyroid-associated ophthalmopathy:<br />

a study of 101 patients attending a combined thryroid-eye clinic.<br />

Clin Endocrinol (Oxf) 1993; 38:367-72.<br />

• 18. Davies TF. Treatment of graves’ orbitopathy (ophthlamopathy).<br />

www.uptodate.com 20 Jun 2011.<br />

• 19. Friedman NJ, Kaiser PK, Pineda R. Thyroid-related<br />

ophthalmopathy. The Massachusetts Eye and Ear Infirmary<br />

Illustrated Manual of Ophthalmology. Saunders 2009. 15-19.<br />

• 20. Griepentrop GJ, Garrity JA. Update on the medical treatment of<br />

Graves’ ophthalmopathy. Int J of Gen Med 2009; 2:263-9.<br />

• 21. Duntas, LH. The evolving role of selenium in the treatment of<br />

graves’ disease and ophthalmopaty. J Thyroid Res 2012; Published<br />

online 2012 January 19. doi: 10.1155/2012/736161.<br />

Coursebook Page 120 of 139<br />

21


5/29/2012<br />

ACNE ROSACEA<br />

LONG TERM COMPLICATIONS OF OCULAR<br />

ROSACEA<br />

Kevin Riedel, O.D.<br />

Portland VA Medical Center<br />

Optometry Resident, PGY-1<br />

<strong>Pacific</strong> <strong>University</strong> NW Resident’s Conference<br />

June 4, 2012<br />

• Idiopathic, chronic dermatologic<br />

condition<br />

• Characterized by erythema of<br />

the skin<br />

• Primarily affecting skin of the<br />

cheeks, forehead, chin, and<br />

nose<br />

• Signs/symptoms vary<br />

DERMATOLOGIC FEATURES<br />

• Subtype 1<br />

• “Erythematotelangiectatic”<br />

• Often asymptomatic<br />

• Characterized by flushing (erythema) and telangiectasia<br />

DERMATOLOGIC FEATURES<br />

• Subtype 2<br />

• “Papulopustular”<br />

• Often asymptomatic, but can have burning sensation of the<br />

skin especially during exacerbations<br />

• Characterized by papules and pustules<br />

DERMATOLOGIC FEATURES<br />

• Subtype 3<br />

• “Phymatous”<br />

• ‘Phyma’ – Greek for swollen or bulbous mass<br />

• More likely to be symptomatic<br />

• Classically characterized by extreme sebaceous gland<br />

hypertrophy and rhinophyma<br />

Coursebook Page 121 of 139<br />

1


5/29/2012<br />

Gnathophyma<br />

Metophyma<br />

Otophyma<br />

TRIGGERS<br />

• Environmental factors can cause an outbreak of symptoms (taken from survey of<br />

1,066 patients by the National Rosacea Society)<br />

• Sun exposure (81%)<br />

• Emotional stress (79%)<br />

• Hot weather (75%)<br />

• Wind (57%)<br />

• Strenuous exercise (56%)<br />

• Alcohol consumption (52%)<br />

• Hot bath/shower (51%)<br />

• Others: spicy foods, hot beverages, cigarette smoke, caffeine<br />

EPIDEMIOLOGY<br />

• More common in:<br />

• Adults (acne vulgaris more common<br />

in adolescents)<br />

• Women, however usually more<br />

severe in men (phymatous rosacea<br />

seen less often in females)<br />

• Fair skin (less common in darkly<br />

pigmented races)<br />

• Northern European descent<br />

• Irish<br />

• English<br />

• Scandanavian<br />

• Dutch<br />

• German<br />

TREATMENT<br />

• Topical antibiotics<br />

• Usually erythromycin or metronidazole<br />

• Oral tetracyclines<br />

• Tetracycline or doxycycline<br />

• Surgical treatment<br />

• Typically for severe phymatous rosacea that does not respond to<br />

oral/topical therapy<br />

• Electrosurgery<br />

• Laser (CO2)<br />

• Dermabrasion<br />

Coursebook Page 122 of 139<br />

2


5/29/2012<br />

BEFORE<br />

AFTER<br />

PATHOPHYSIOLOGY – THEORIES<br />

• Climate exposure<br />

• Chemical/food exposure<br />

• Microbial trigger<br />

• Impaired iron metabolism<br />

• Affects of reactive oxygen species and free radical exposure<br />

• Vascular endothelial growth factor and other angiogenic factors<br />

• Antimicrobial peptides<br />

PATHOPHYSIOLOGY – THEORIES<br />

• Climate exposure<br />

• Chemical/food exposure<br />

• Microbial trigger<br />

• Impaired iron metabolism<br />

• Affects of reactive oxygen species and free radical exposure<br />

• Vascular endothelial growth factor and other angiogenic factors<br />

• Antimicrobial peptides<br />

CLIMATE EXPOSURE<br />

• Harsh ultraviolet exposure can cause damage to superficial<br />

blood vessels and connective tissue in the dermis<br />

• This theoretically can lead to chronic increased vascular<br />

permeability and dermatitis<br />

• Could explain why rosacea is typically seen on sun exposed<br />

areas<br />

• Sunlight is believed to be a possible trigger of outbreaks<br />

PATHOPHYSIOLOGY – THEORIES<br />

• Climate exposure<br />

• Chemical/food exposure<br />

• Microbial trigger<br />

• Impaired iron metabolism<br />

• Affects of reactive oxygen species and free radical exposure<br />

• Vascular endothelial growth factor and other angiogenic factors<br />

• Antimicrobial peptides<br />

Coursebook Page 123 of 139<br />

3


5/29/2012<br />

CHEMICAL/FOOD EXPOSURE<br />

• Spicy food, hot beverages, & alcohol known to cause<br />

exacerbations<br />

• Medications can also cause exacerbations<br />

(topical/intranasal steroids, high dose vitamin B6/B12,<br />

amiodarone)<br />

• No evidence that these are the underlying cause of the<br />

disease<br />

PATHOPHYSIOLOGY – THEORIES<br />

• Climate exposure<br />

• Chemical/food exposure<br />

• Microbial trigger<br />

• Impaired iron metabolism<br />

• Affects of reactive oxygen species and free radical exposure<br />

• Vascular endothelial growth factor and other angiogenic factors<br />

• Antimicrobial peptides<br />

MICROBIAL TRIGGER<br />

• Demodex (parasitic mites that live in & around human hair follicles)<br />

• Prefer skin of nose and cheeks<br />

• Some research shows that helper T-cell infiltration occurs adjacent<br />

to known Demodex infestation in patients with rosacea<br />

• Demodex is also found in many healthy individuals without rosacea<br />

Bonnar E, Eustace P, Powell FC. The Demodex mite population in rosacea. J Am Acad Dermatol. Mar<br />

1993;28(3):443-8.<br />

• Helicobacter pylori (bacterium associated with peptic ulcer disease)<br />

• Incidentally, patients with rosacea have been found to have higher<br />

incidence of serological evidence of H. pylori<br />

PATHOPHYSIOLOGY – THEORIES<br />

• Climate exposure<br />

• Chemical/food exposure<br />

• Microbial trigger<br />

• Impaired iron metabolism<br />

• Affects of reactive oxygen species and free radical exposure<br />

• Vascular endothelial growth factor and other angiogenic factors<br />

• Antimicrobial peptides<br />

IMPAIRED IRON METABOLISM<br />

• Iron catalyzes conversion of hydrogen peroxide to free radicals, which<br />

cause tissue injury<br />

• Unmetabolized iron is stored as ferritin<br />

• “Oxidative stress and ferritin expression in the skin of patients with<br />

rosacea.” J Am Acad Dermatol. Feb 2009<br />

• Amount of ferritin in histological skin analysis significantly higher in<br />

patients with rosacea<br />

• Higher ferritin was associated with more advanced stages of rosacea<br />

Tisma VS, Basta-Juzbasic A, Jaganjac M, et al. Oxidative stress and ferritin expression in the skin of patients with<br />

rosacea. J Am Acad Dermatol. Feb 2009;60(2):270-6<br />

PATHOPHYSIOLOGY – THEORIES<br />

• Climate exposure<br />

• Chemical/food exposure<br />

• Microbial trigger<br />

• Impaired iron metabolism<br />

• Affects of reactive oxygen species<br />

• Vascular endothelial growth factor and other angiogenic factors<br />

• Antimicrobial peptides<br />

Coursebook Page 124 of 139<br />

4


5/29/2012<br />

REACTIVE OXYGEN SPECIES<br />

• Released early in inflammatory process by<br />

neutrophils<br />

• Cause tissue damage and cause the release of<br />

inflammatory mediators from damaged cells<br />

PATHOPHYSIOLOGY – THEORIES<br />

• Climate exposure<br />

• Chemical/food exposure<br />

• Microbial trigger<br />

• Impaired iron metabolism<br />

• Affects of reactive oxygen species and free radical exposure<br />

• Vascular endothelial growth factor and other angiogenic<br />

factors<br />

• Antimicrobial peptides<br />

VEGF & ANGIOGENESIS<br />

• Studies show increased VEGF expression in skin with<br />

rosacea lesions vs. skin without rosacea lesions (within<br />

the same patient)<br />

• “Therapeutic response of rosacea to dobesilate”. Eur J<br />

Med Res. Oct 18 2005<br />

• Topical dobesilate (used in Europe) improved<br />

erythema and telangiectasia in rosacea<br />

Cuevas P, Arrazola JM. Therapeutic response of rosacea to dobesilate. Eur J Med Res.<br />

Oct 18 2005;10(10):454-6.<br />

PATHOPHYSIOLOGY – THEORIES<br />

• Climate exposure<br />

• Chemical/food exposure<br />

• Microbial trigger<br />

• Impaired iron metabolism<br />

• Affects of reactive oxygen species and free radical exposure<br />

• Vascular endothelial growth factor and other angiogenic factors<br />

• Antimicrobial peptides<br />

ANTIMICROBIAL PEPTIDES<br />

• Part of the innate immune response<br />

• Cathelicidin<br />

• Abnormally high levels in rosacea patients vs.<br />

normals<br />

• Stimulates angiogenesis and modulates expression<br />

of VEGF<br />

• When injected into mice it induces inflammation,<br />

erythema, and telangiectasia<br />

Schauber J, Gallo RL. Antimicrobial peptides and the skin immune defense system. J Allergy<br />

Clin Immunol. Aug 2008;122(2):261-6<br />

OCULAR ROSACEA (SUBTYPE 4)<br />

• Meibomian glands are sebaceous glands and<br />

are often affected by acne rosacea<br />

• Ocular rosacea is very common (prevalent in up<br />

to 50% of patients with rosacea) and very<br />

commonly ignored by patients and their doctors<br />

Coursebook Page 125 of 139<br />

5


5/29/2012<br />

FEATURES OF OCULAR ROSACEA<br />

• Mild ocular rosacea<br />

• Signs<br />

• Meibomian gland dysfunction<br />

• Lid margin telangiectasia<br />

• Reduced tear stability<br />

(decreased TBUT)<br />

• Symptoms<br />

• Can be asymptomatic<br />

• **Fluctuating vision**<br />

• Mild foreign body sensation<br />

FEATURES OF OCULAR ROSACEA<br />

• Moderate ocular rosacea<br />

• Signs<br />

• Recurrent hordeola &<br />

chalazia<br />

• Corneal disruptions<br />

• Non-central punctate<br />

epithelial erosions<br />

• Conjunctival hyperemia<br />

• Symptoms<br />

• Constant blurred vision<br />

• Persistent epiphoria<br />

• **Burning sensation**<br />

FEATURES OF OCULAR ROSACEA<br />

• Severe ocular rosacea<br />

• Signs<br />

• Severe keratitis<br />

• Coalescent PEE affecting central<br />

cornea<br />

• Corneal ulcers<br />

• Corneal edema<br />

• Corneal neovascularization<br />

• Symptoms<br />

• Blurred vision<br />

• Eye pain<br />

TREATMENT OF OCULAR ROSACEA<br />

• Mild stages<br />

• Preservative free artificial tears QID/PRN<br />

• Eyelid hygiene -- VERY important part of the management<br />

• Avoidance of triggers<br />

• Avoidance of over-the-counter medications that dry out mucous membranes<br />

• Decongestants<br />

• Anti-histamines<br />

• Avoidance of over-the-counter eye drops with preservatives<br />

• Visine and other ocular decongestants<br />

• Artificial tears with preservative<br />

EYELID HYGIENE<br />

• What is a warm compress<br />

• Temperature Not warm…you want HOT<br />

• Duration Needs to be at least 5 minutes, if not 10-15<br />

• Digital massage is essential – breaks up stagnant material in meibomian<br />

glands<br />

• Lid scrubs<br />

• Commercial preparations vs. baby shampoo<br />

• Either works fine, but warm compress with digital massage is more<br />

important<br />

• Better for anterior blepharitis, in ocular rosacea the disease process<br />

is occurring in the meibomian glands<br />

TREATMENT OF OCULAR ROSACEA<br />

• Moderate Stages<br />

• Night-time lubrication<br />

• Celluvisc or lubricating<br />

ointment qHS<br />

• Eyelid hygiene<br />

• Topical steroids for<br />

symptomatic exacerbations<br />

• Lotemax or<br />

fluorometholone<br />

• Topical cyclosporine for longterm<br />

control of inflammation<br />

Coursebook Page 126 of 139<br />

6


5/29/2012<br />

TREATMENT OF OCULAR ROSACEA<br />

• Moderate Stages<br />

• Low dose oral doxycycline<br />

• Start 50-100mg bid then taper<br />

to as low as 50mg qd or qod<br />

• Judicious use of punctal plugs<br />

• Must treat lid<br />

disease/inflammation first or<br />

else you are keeping a pool of<br />

inflammatory tears on the<br />

ocular surface<br />

• Consider referral to dermatologist<br />

depending on individual<br />

presentation and symptomology<br />

NOTES ON DOXYCYCLINE<br />

• Not appropriate for pregnant/breastfeeding women or for children<br />

• Use with caution in patients on chronic anticoagulation (coumadin)<br />

• Increases the INR, an indicator of increased bleeding risk<br />

• Primary care physician or clinical pharmacist should always be consulted<br />

• Use caution in liver/kidney disease<br />

• Consult with primary care physician in patients with complicated medical<br />

histories<br />

• Instructions<br />

• Take on empty stomach<br />

• Take separate from dairy products, calcium supplements, & iron supplements<br />

• Side effects<br />

• Photosensitivity<br />

• GI upset/diarrhea<br />

ANTI-INFLAMMATORY PROPERTIES OF<br />

DOXYCYCLINE<br />

• Inhibits interleukin-1 in cultured human corneal epithelium<br />

Solomon, A et al. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2000 Aug;41(9):2544-57.<br />

• Inhibits MMP-13 & MMP-8 in vitro<br />

Smith GN Jr et al. Arthritis Rheum. 1999 Jun;42(6):1140-6.<br />

• Accepted treatment for dermatologic manifestations of rosacea for many<br />

years<br />

RESTASIS & OCULAR ROSACEA<br />

• Cyclosporine is an immunosuppressant that is used systemically to combat<br />

rejection in organ transplants<br />

• Reduces inflammation by inhibition of T-lymphocyte activation and migration<br />

• Topical cyclcosporine (Restasis) BID shown to be more effective than<br />

artificial tears BID in some studies<br />

• Statistically significant improvement in Schirmer scores, symptoms<br />

(OSDI questionaire), tear breakup time, & corneal staining scores.<br />

Schechter B. Adv Ther (2009) 26(6)<br />

TREATMENT OF OCULAR ROSACEA<br />

• Severe Stages<br />

• Consider referral to corneal specialist<br />

• May need corneal transplantation if corneal neovascularization<br />

or ulcer causing central corneal scarring<br />

TREATMENT OF OCULAR ROSACEA<br />

• Emerging Therapy – Anti-VEGF agents<br />

• Commonly used for retinal conditions<br />

• Choroidal neovascularization<br />

• Diabetic macular edema<br />

• Cystoid macular edema associated with retinal vascular<br />

occlusions<br />

• Now being used in subconjunctival injection by<br />

ophthalmologists to induce recession of neovascular vessels<br />

in the cornea and increase chances of successful corneal<br />

grafts<br />

Coursebook Page 127 of 139<br />

7


5/29/2012<br />

FUNCTIONAL TREATMENT FOR ADVANCED<br />

CASES<br />

• Modest magnification<br />

• Increased add power with proper education<br />

• Low power hand held magnifiers<br />

• Low power Optivisor for hands-free near<br />

tasks<br />

• **Glare Control**<br />

• These patients will be VERY light sensitive<br />

• Wrap-around tint<br />

• Gray/Plum for bright days<br />

• Amber/Yellow for cloudy days<br />

Benayoun Y et al. “Effects of Subconjunctival Bevacizumab on Corneal<br />

Neovascularization: Results of a Prospective Study.” Cornea, online ahead of print 2012.<br />

CASE PRESENTATION – A LESSON TO BE<br />

LEARNED<br />

• 9/23/2011 – Portland VAMC Optometry Clinic<br />

• 57yo white male, presenting for consult from PCP for baseline<br />

DM exam (recently diagnosed)<br />

• CC: Decreased vision and eye pain, both gradually progressing<br />

for 3 months<br />

• Eyes feel very dry and scratchy, and pain is constant and sharp,<br />

especially on blink<br />

• Vision “foggy”, like “looking through water”<br />

• LEE: August 2010<br />

OCULAR HISTORY<br />

• Chronic dry eye syndrome secondary to ocular rosacea and ectropion<br />

• Chronic ocular allergies<br />

• Refractive error & presbyopia<br />

• Ocular Medications<br />

• PFAT several times daily<br />

• Cromolyn sodium QID OU<br />

• FML once daily OU (ran out several months ago)<br />

MEDICAL HISTORY<br />

• Recently diagnosed type 2 diabetes mellitus<br />

• Last A1c: 13.4<br />

• Patient taking metformin, reports recent improvement in home blood glucose levels since<br />

starting<br />

• Depression/anxiety associated with post-traumatic stress disorder<br />

• Chronic allergies<br />

• HTN/HLD/CAD<br />

• Systemic medications<br />

• Oral doxycycline (for ocular rosacea)<br />

• Oral antihistamine qd<br />

• Oral anti-depressant<br />

• Metformin<br />

• Lisinopril/Simvastatin/Metoprolol<br />

INITIAL FINDINGS<br />

• Visual Acuity (with correction)<br />

OD: 20/200 PH 20/150<br />

OS: 20/100+2 PH 20/70<br />

• Pupils ERRL, no APD noted OD or OS<br />

• Visual field FTFC OD & OS<br />

• EOM intact OU, no additional pain on movement<br />

Coursebook Page 128 of 139<br />

8


5/29/2012<br />

ANTERIOR SEGMENT FINDINGS<br />

CORNEA OS 20/100 (20/70 BCVA)<br />

• External: (+)flushed cheeks & prominent blood vessels on cheeks/forehead/nose<br />

• Lids/Lashes:<br />

• Significant meibomian gland stasis on digital expression<br />

• Severe lid margin telangiectasia<br />

• Generalized erythema with prominent eyelid fullness<br />

• Very poor lower eyelid snapback<br />

• Conjunctiva: significant, diffuse conjunctival injection 360<br />

• Cornea<br />

CORNEA OD 20/200 (20/150 BCVA)<br />

ASSESSMENT:<br />

1. Extensive Corneal Neovascularization OD>OS related to multifactorial ocular surface<br />

disease<br />

Coursebook Page 129 of 139<br />

9


5/29/2012<br />

TREATMENT<br />

• Pred Forte QID OU<br />

• Cyclosporine BID OU<br />

• PFAT q1hr OU<br />

• Celluvisc qHS OU<br />

• Eyelid hygiene BID OU<br />

• d/c Cromolyn sodium<br />

• Oral NSAID for pain<br />

• Avoid oral antihistamine<br />

• Referral to Cornea Clinic<br />

LESSONS<br />

• Something that is common and often relatively benign (like<br />

ocular rosacea) with the right circumstances & factors can<br />

cause vision loss and blindness<br />

• Early treatment is key because advanced ocular rosacea is very<br />

challenging to control<br />

Coursebook Page 130 of 139<br />

10


5/29/2012<br />

Benjamin Taylor, OD<br />

White City VA SORCC<br />

• 59 year old Caucasian male presented to clinic for his<br />

annual diabetic eye exam<br />

• Patient complaints were:<br />

• 1. Blurred vision at distance<br />

• 2. For the last year he has been noticing “stars” in his<br />

peripheral vision 2‐3 times a week, greater in the left eye.<br />

He reported that this generally lasted for 5‐10 minutes<br />

but never lasted more than an hour and then would just<br />

fade away.<br />

• Type II Diabetes<br />

• Last A1c‐‐>6.7<br />

• Congestive Heart Failure<br />

• Patient has pacemaker<br />

• Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease<br />

• Sleep Apnea<br />

• Anemia secondary to kidney failure<br />

• Hyperlipidemia<br />

• Cholesterol‐‐>205<br />

• LDL‐‐>could not be accurately calculated because triglycerides were<br />

greater than 400<br />

• HDL‐‐>29<br />

• Triglycerides‐‐>674<br />

• Hyperuricemia<br />

• Albuterol<br />

• Carvedilol<br />

• Digoxin<br />

• Furosemide<br />

• Glipizide<br />

• Hydralazine HCl<br />

• Omeprazole<br />

• Simvastatin<br />

• Valsartan<br />

• Warfarin—patient reported starting this just two months<br />

earlier<br />

• Visual Acuities without Correction<br />

• OD: 20/40<br />

• OS: 20/25+2<br />

• Pupils: errl, (‐)apd ou<br />

• EOM’s: full/no restrictions<br />

• CVF: ftfc od, os<br />

• Cover Test: orthophoria at 6m<br />

• Refraction<br />

• OD: +0.50‐1.50x079 VA: 20/20<br />

• OS: plano‐1.00x085 VA: 20/20‐1<br />

• Add +2.50 20/20 OU<br />

• Slit lamp findings<br />

• Lids/Lashes: Mild Meibomian capping<br />

• Conjunctiva: Pinguecula OU<br />

• Cornea: Clear OU<br />

• Anterior Chamber: Deep and Quiet OU<br />

• Iris: Normal OU, (‐)NVI OU<br />

• Lens: 1+ NS OU, trace ACC OU<br />

• Intraocular Pressure<br />

• OD: 15mmHg<br />

• OS: 16mmHg<br />

Coursebook Page 131 of 139<br />

1


5/29/2012<br />

• C/D Ratio<br />

• OD: 0.45v/0.40h<br />

• OS: 0.35 round, flame shaped hemorrhage on inferior temporal rim<br />

• Blood Vessels<br />

• Mild tortuosity, (‐)venous engorgement<br />

• Posterior Pole<br />

• OD: one blot heme inf/temp at the edge of arcades<br />

• OS: two large blot hemes superior to the macula within 1DD with<br />

foveal thickening. Extensive blot hemes all 4 quadrants throughout<br />

the arcades.<br />

• Macular thickening OU per OCT<br />

• Periphery<br />

• OD: few scattered mid‐peripheral blot hemes<br />

• OS: extensive mid‐peripheral blot hemes all 4 quadrants<br />

• (‐)holes, tears, retinal detachments OU<br />

• Assessment/<strong>Differential</strong>s<br />

• Central Retinal Vein Occlusion OS<br />

• Diabetic Retinopathy with possible CSME<br />

• Asymmetric OS>OD<br />

• Carotid Occlusive Disease secondary to greater hemorrhaging<br />

in the left eye<br />

• Warfarin induced retinopathy OS<br />

• Since patient recently started this medication 2 months earlier<br />

• Plan<br />

• Patient was sent to lab for ProtimeINR<br />

• Ordered Carotid Doppler Ultrasound<br />

• Also placed consult to Portland VAMC for fluorescein<br />

angiography<br />

• ProtimeINR came back slightly low at 1.9<br />

• Carotid Ultrasound results were estimated to have 90‐<br />

99% stenosis for both the right and left internal<br />

carotid arteries<br />

Coursebook Page 132 of 139<br />

2


5/29/2012<br />

• Patient then decided not to pursue further optometric<br />

testing until the stenosis was addressed<br />

• VA Physician referred patient to local Vascular<br />

Surgeon<br />

• Patient chose to pursue<br />

bilateral carotid<br />

endarterectomy done by<br />

a local vascular surgeon<br />

in Medford. The left side<br />

first on 11/16/2011 then<br />

the right on 12/28/2011.<br />

http://www.primehealthchannel.com/carotid‐endarterectomy.html<br />

• After endarterectomies patient was referred to local<br />

Ophthalmologist in Medford for a fluorescein<br />

angiography<br />

• Results are as follows:<br />

Taken 1/11/2012 Taken 10/31/2011<br />

Coursebook Page 133 of 139<br />

3


5/29/2012<br />

• Window defect associated<br />

with pigmentary change in<br />

drusen<br />

• One fine microaneurysm<br />

without leakage<br />

• The left side had multiple<br />

microaneurysms in the<br />

temporal macula and<br />

periphery without<br />

significant leakage.<br />

• There was also blockage<br />

from dot and blot<br />

hemorrhages.<br />

• There was no significant<br />

filling delay of the choroid<br />

or retina for either eye.<br />

• Probable ocular ischemic syndrome, left eye<br />

• Non‐proliferative diabetic retinopathy, left eye greater<br />

than right<br />

• History of carotid occlusive disease status post<br />

bilateral carotid endarterectomy<br />

• Cataracts<br />

• The patient was placed under observation and was<br />

scheduled for follow up with Ophthalmology in 3<br />

months.<br />

• Patient was seen again on 4/23/2012 and the findings<br />

below were described by the Ophthalmologist:<br />

• The right retinal periphery has one or two small<br />

intraretinal hemorrhages. In the left periphery, there<br />

are several intraretinal hemorrhages in each of the four<br />

quadrants of the periphery. This represents a significant<br />

decrease in hemorrhages from when I last saw him in<br />

January.<br />

• Epidemiology<br />

• Average age of 65 years, rare before 50<br />

• Men affected 2x more than women<br />

• No racial predilection<br />

• Bilateral involvement in approximately 22% of cases<br />

• 7.5 cases per 1 million people per year<br />

• May be an underestimation as OIS may be misdiagnosed as<br />

other vascular diseases<br />

• 29% of patients with Symptomatic carotid occlusion<br />

manifest retinal vascular changes that are usually<br />

Asymptomatic, and 1.5% of them per year will progress<br />

to symptomatic OIS<br />

• Pathogenesis<br />

• OIS develops primarily in patients<br />

with poor collateral circulation<br />

between the internal and external<br />

carotid arteries or between the two<br />

internal carotid arteries<br />

• People with well developed<br />

collateral circulation may not<br />

develop OIS even with total<br />

occlusion of the internal carotid<br />

artery<br />

• Those with poor collateral<br />

circulation can develop OIS with<br />

less than 50% stenosis of the<br />

internal carotid artery<br />

http://medicaldictionary.thefreedictionary.com/_/viewer.aspxpath=mosbyC<br />

AM&name=500069‐fx30.jpg<br />

Coursebook Page 134 of 139<br />

4


5/29/2012<br />

• Symptoms: patients may have the following<br />

complaints<br />

• Vision Loss<br />

• Can be described as loss of vision anywhere from suddenly to<br />

gradually over the course of a month<br />

• Pain<br />

• Patients will sometimes describe it as a dull, constant ache in<br />

the affected eye. Dull pain also felt over the orbit, upper face,<br />

and temple. This pain may worsen when patient is upright.<br />

• Lying down either can relieve or lessen the pain.<br />

• Episcleral Injection<br />

http://www.aafp.org/afp/2002/0915/p991.html<br />

• Corneal Edema<br />

• Rubeosis Iridis<br />

• Can lead to:<br />

• Hyphema<br />

• Neovascular Glaucoma<br />

http://arapaho.nsuok.edu/~fulk/kanski.html<br />

• Iridocyclitis<br />

• Lead to anterior or<br />

posterior synechiae<br />

• Other Anterior Segment findings:<br />

• Corneo‐scleral Melting<br />

• Iris Atrophy<br />

• Fixed semi‐dilated or sluggish pupil<br />

• Uveal Ectropion<br />

• Asymmetric Cataract<br />

http://disorders.eyes.arizona.edu/disorders/corneal‐dystrophycongenital‐endothelial‐1<br />

http://www.musculoskeletalnetwork.com/rheumatoidarthritis/content/article/1145622/1517642<br />

Coursebook Page 135 of 139<br />

5


5/29/2012<br />

• Cherry Red Spot<br />

• Neovascularization of the disc<br />

http://content.lib.utah.edu/cdm4/item_viewer.phpCISOROO<br />

T=/EHSL‐WFH&CISOPTR=850<br />

http://www.southcoasteye.com/whatsnew.html<br />

• Choroidal Neovascular<br />

Membrane<br />

• Cholesterol Emboli<br />

• Hollenhorst Plaque<br />

http://www.kenteyesurgery.co.uk/a‐z‐of‐eyes‐view.php/amd‐‐<br />

‐age‐related‐macular‐degeneration<br />

• Dilated Retinal Veins<br />

• Narrowed Retinal Arteries<br />

http://www.aao.org/theeyeshaveit/optic‐fundus/hollenhorstplaque.cfm<br />

http://content.lib.utah.edu/cdm4/item_viewer.phpCISOROOT=/EHSL‐<br />

WFH&CISOPTR=524<br />

• Other Posterior Segment Findings<br />

• Retinal hemorrhages<br />

• More prominent in the mid‐periphery<br />

• Microaneurysms<br />

• Macular capillary telangiectasia<br />

• Retinal arteriovenous communication<br />

• Cotton‐wool spots<br />

• Neovascularization elsewhere<br />

• Vitreous Hemorrhage<br />

• Spontaneous Retinal Arterial Pulsations<br />

• Anterior Ischemic Optic Neuropathy<br />

Coursebook Page 136 of 139<br />

6


5/29/2012<br />

• <strong>Differential</strong> <strong>Diagnosis</strong><br />

• Diabetic Retinopathy and Central Retinal Vein<br />

Occlusion are the two most likely conditions to be<br />

confused with OIS<br />

• One way to differentiate is light digital pressure on the eyelid.<br />

Doing this on eyes with OIS will induce retinal arterial<br />

pulsations. (Ophthalmodynamometry)<br />

• Diabetic retinopathy may coexist with OIS.<br />

• It is recommended that those patients with unilateral<br />

retinopathy or large asymmetry of retinopathy be examined<br />

for carotid occlusive disease<br />

• Systemic Associations<br />

• A study by Mizener et al in 1988 of 32 patients showed<br />

the following associated systemic diseases<br />

• Diabetes mellitus (56%)<br />

• Hypertension (50%)<br />

• Coronary Artery Disease (38%)<br />

• Previous Cerebral Infarction or Transient Ischemic Attack<br />

(31%)<br />

• The study also showed that OIS was the initial<br />

manifestation of carotid occlusive disease in 69% of the<br />

patients.<br />

• Other Systemic Associations with OIS:<br />

• Giant Cell Arteritis<br />

• Aortic Arch Syndrome<br />

• Takayasu Arteritis<br />

• <strong>Diagnosis</strong> techniques<br />

• Fluorescein Angiography<br />

• Indocyanine Green Angiography<br />

• Electroretinography<br />

• Visual‐Evoked Potentials<br />

• Ophthalmodynamometry<br />

• Ocular Plethysmography<br />

• Imaging Methods<br />

• Carotid Duplex Ultrasound<br />

• Color Doppler Imaging of Retrobulbar Vessels<br />

• Magnetic Resonance Angiography<br />

• Carotid Arteriography<br />

• Fluorescein Angiography<br />

• Delayed choroidal filling time<br />

• Staining of the retinal vessels<br />

• Indocyanine Green Angiography<br />

• Delayed choroidal filling time<br />

• Slow filling of the watershed zones of the choroid<br />

• Electroretinography<br />

• The a wave corresponds to photoreceptor activity<br />

• The b wave corresponds to bipolar cells<br />

• OIS results in decreased amplitude of a and b waves<br />

• Visual‐Evoked Potentials<br />

• Recovery time after photostress is prolonged in patients<br />

whom have severe carotid artery stenosis<br />

Coursebook Page 137 of 139<br />

7


5/29/2012<br />

• Ophthalmodynamometry<br />

• Used to estimate the pressure in the<br />

Ophthalmic Artery, approximately at the<br />

origin of the Central Retinal Artery.<br />

• Apply pressure to globe to increase IOP, when<br />

artery pulsations are observed this reflects<br />

the ophthalmic artery diastolic pressure.<br />

• In OIS the Central Retinal Artery perfusion<br />

pressure is low meaning less pressure is<br />

necessary for artery pulsations to appear.<br />

• Ocular Plethysmography<br />

• Measures indirectly the Ophthalmic Artery pressure by<br />

recording variations in the size and volume of the eye or<br />

ocular pulsations<br />

• http://bjo.bmj.com/content/87/3/361.2.full<br />

• Imaging Methods<br />

• Carotid Duplex Ultrasound<br />

• Probably will be most ordered diagnostic test by Optometrist<br />

when OIS is suspected<br />

• Color Doppler Imaging of Retrobulbar Vessels<br />

• Magnetic Resonance Angiography<br />

• Carotid Arteriography<br />

• Management<br />

• Carotid Endarterectomy<br />

• http://www.youtube.com/watchv=8rPwO‐093Lo<br />

• Carotid Artery Stenting<br />

• http://www.youtube.com/watchv=6nyNLQUUmOQ&feature=related<br />

• Study from the New England Journal of Medicine called the CREST trial<br />

• 4 year rate of stroke or death was 6.4% with stenting and 4.7% with<br />

endarterectomy.<br />

• The overall results of this study showed that stenting and endarterectomy were<br />

associated with similar primary composite outcomes<br />

• Periprocedural stroke<br />

• Myocardial infarction<br />

• Death and subsequent ipsilateral stroke<br />

• Stroke was more likely after stenting and myocardial infarction was more likely<br />

after endarterectomy. Also worth noting was that younger patients had slightly<br />

fewer problems after stenting and older patients had fewer problems after<br />

endarterectomy<br />

• Management Continued<br />

• Treatment is directed toward control of anterior segment<br />

inflammation, retinal ischemia, increased IOP and<br />

neovascular glaucoma<br />

• Topical Therapy<br />

• Steroid<br />

• Cycloplegic<br />

• Beta blockers<br />

• Alpha Agonists<br />

• Prostaglandins should be avoided because they can increase ocular<br />

inflammation<br />

• When neovascular glaucoma develops surgery or<br />

cycloablation is often needed<br />

• Trabeculectomy with antimetabolites<br />

• Aqueous shunt implants or diode laser cyclophotocoagulation<br />

• Management Continued<br />

• Panretinal Photocoagulation may be effective in some<br />

patients with ocular neovascularization caused from carotid<br />

occlusive disease<br />

• PRP caused regression of iris neovascularization in 36% of the<br />

treated eyes<br />

• Intravitreal Anti VEGF has been used to treat iris<br />

neovascularization and macular edema<br />

• 2 cases reported by Amselem et al of Intravitreal Avastin injection<br />

when carotid endarterectomy was contraindicated<br />

• One week after injection there was a regression of NVI in both cases<br />

and at three months there was no NVI<br />

• One case had a recurrence of NVI at 4 months and was reinjected<br />

and at seven months remained without NVI<br />

Coursebook Page 138 of 139<br />

8


5/29/2012<br />

• Conclusion<br />

• Signs and symptoms of carotid artery occlusive disease<br />

may occur before cerebrovascular and cardiovascular<br />

complications. As a result, optometrists may be the first<br />

to deal with patients suffering from carotid artery<br />

occlusive disease and should be aware of the clinical<br />

presentation of OIS.<br />

• Amselem L, Montero J, et al. Intravitreal Bevacizumab (Avastin) Injection in Ocular<br />

Ischemic Syndrome. American Journal of Ophthalmology 2007;144:122‐124.<br />

• Brott T, Hobson R, et al. Stenting versus Endarterectomy for Treatment of Carotid‐Artery<br />

Stenosis. The New England Journal of Medicine 2010;363(1):11‐23<br />

• Brown GC, Magargal LE. The ocular ischemic syndrome. Clinical, fluorescein<br />

angiographic and carotid angiographic features. Int Ophthalmol. 1988;11 (4):239‐51<br />

• Cohen R, Padilla J, et al. Carotid artery occlusive disease and ocular manifestations:<br />

Importance of identifying patients at risk. Optometry (2010)81, 359‐363.<br />

• Ferguson G, Eliasziw M, et al. The North American Symptomatic Carotid<br />

Endarterectomy Trial: Surgical Results in 1415 patients. Stroke, Journal of the American<br />

Heart Association 1999, 30: 1751‐1758.<br />

• Groschel K, Ernemann U, et al. Incidence and risk factors for medical complications after<br />

carotid artery stenting. Journal of Vascular Surgery 2005; 42: 1101‐1107.<br />

• McCullough H, Reinert C, et al. Ocular findings as predictors of carotid artery occlusive<br />

disease: Is carotid imaging justified Journal of Vascular Surgery 2004; 40: 279‐286.<br />

• Mendrinos E, Machinis T, Pournaras C. Ocular Ischemic Syndrome. Survey of<br />

Ophthalmology 2010; 55(1): 2‐34.<br />

Coursebook Page 139 of 139<br />

9

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!