02.01.2015 Views

Differential Diagnosis - Pacific University

Differential Diagnosis - Pacific University

Differential Diagnosis - Pacific University

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

2012 NORTHWEST RESIDENTS CONFERENCE<br />

<strong>Pacific</strong> <strong>University</strong> College of Optometry – Jefferson 224<br />

Monday, June 4, 2012<br />

8:00 am – 6:50 pm<br />

TABLE OF CONTENTS<br />

Jason Bleazard, OD<br />

VAMC Puget Sound<br />

Judy Posner, OD<br />

VAMC Jonathan Wainwright<br />

Anna Griffith, OD<br />

<strong>Pacific</strong> <strong>University</strong> & Associated Clinics<br />

Jessica Dennis, OD<br />

Eye Care Associates of Nevada<br />

Oliver Kuhn-Wilken, OD<br />

VAMC Puget Sound<br />

Jonee Brandt, OD<br />

VAMC Puget Sound<br />

Kelvin So, OD<br />

<strong>Pacific</strong> <strong>University</strong> & Associated Clinics<br />

Alison She, OD<br />

IRIS Ophthalmology Clinic<br />

Prevention & Treatment of Pseudophakic Bullous Keratopathy Pages 2-9<br />

Herpes Stromal Keratitis PAGES 10-19<br />

TBI: Treatment and Management of Accommodative and Vergence<br />

Dysfunction<br />

PAGES 20-26<br />

A Partial Cranial Nerve Three Palsy PAGES 27-35<br />

BREAK: 10:00-10:20<br />

The Problem with Prostaglandins: An Assessment of the Risks and<br />

Contraindications<br />

PAGES 36-40<br />

Etiology & Management of Posner-Schlossman Syndrome PAGES 41-45<br />

Case Studies in Pediatric contact Lens Correction Modalities for<br />

Myopic Refractive Error & Myopia Control<br />

PAGES 46-53<br />

Endothelial Cell Changes Associated with Intraocular Lens Surgery PAGES 54-58<br />

Lunch: 12:20 – 1:00<br />

Bic Trinh, OD<br />

Eye Care Associates of Nevada<br />

Amy Pedersen, OD<br />

Portland VA Medical Center<br />

Erin Bender, OD<br />

Lebanon VA Medical Center<br />

Allison Coit, OD<br />

Spokane VA Medical Center<br />

Kendra Kallemeyn, OD<br />

Roseburg VA Medical Center<br />

Persistent Epithelial Defect in Post Corneal Graft: A Case Study PAGES 59-64<br />

One Conjunctivitis Away From Endophthalmitis: A Case Report of<br />

Blebitis<br />

PAGES 65-69<br />

A Very Lumpy Nerve: A Case of Optic Nerve Head Drusen PAGES 70-76<br />

Postoperative Endophthalmitis: A Case Report PAGES 77-80<br />

Valsalva Retinopathy PAGES 81-87<br />

BREAK: 3:30-3:50<br />

Brett Richardson, OD<br />

Spokane VA Medical Center<br />

Keely Hoban, OD & Grace Tsan, OD<br />

Portland VA Medical Center<br />

Zachary Oswald, OD<br />

VAMC Jonathan Wainwright<br />

Kevin Riedel, OD<br />

Portland VA Medical Center<br />

Benjamin Taylor, OD<br />

VA Southern Oregon Rehabilitation<br />

Center & Clinics<br />

Hypotensive Crisis: Vision loss secondary to non-ocular surgery PAGES 88-92<br />

An Assessment of the Diabetic Teleretinal Imaging Program (TRIP)<br />

at the Portland Veterans Affairs Medical Center – A Retrospective<br />

Study<br />

PAGES 93-99<br />

Radioiodine Therapy & Graves’ Ophthalmopathy PAGES 100-120<br />

Long Term Ocular Complications of Rosacea PAGES 121-130<br />

Ocular Manifestations of Carotid Occlusive Disease & Ocular<br />

Ischemic Syndrome: A Case Study<br />

PAGES 131-139<br />

This program is sponsored in part by an unrestricted educational grant<br />

from


Coursebook Page 1 of 139


5/29/2012<br />

Prevention, <strong>Diagnosis</strong>, and Management.<br />

Jason Bleazard, O.D.,<br />

American Lake Veterans’ Association, Tacoma, WA<br />

Five Layers<br />

(anterior to<br />

posterior)<br />

◦ Epithelium<br />

◦ Bowman’s<br />

Layer<br />

◦ Stroma<br />

◦ Descemet’s<br />

Membrane<br />

◦ Endothelium<br />

Endothelial cells are connected by gap<br />

junctions and macular occludens and thus<br />

make up a very slightly permeable membrane<br />

between the stroma and aqueous humor.<br />

Recall that the corneal endothelium is in fact a<br />

specialized epithelial layer. The base of the<br />

cells attach to Decemet’s, while the apices face<br />

the anterior chamber.<br />

• Water follows large molecules such as amino<br />

acids and glucose into the stroma.<br />

• The endothelial cells pump water out of the<br />

cornea via Sodium/Potassium ATP-ase pumps<br />

and aquaporins.<br />

• A compromised endothelium may lead to<br />

stroma edema<br />

• The endothelial cells of the cornea do not<br />

replicate.<br />

• It follows that adult corneas have a lower<br />

endothelial cell density than youngsters.<br />

• Damage to the endothelium further decrease<br />

endothelial cells counts.<br />

Coursebook Page 2 of 139<br />

1


5/29/2012<br />

Normal Endothelial<br />

Mosaic<br />

Corneal guttata<br />

Depositions of basement membrane in<br />

Descemet’s, cause thickening and bulging<br />

into the anterior chamber.<br />

Peripherally, these are termed Hassall-Henle<br />

bodies<br />

Centrally, the areas of thickening are called<br />

guttata<br />

Guttata represent thinning of the<br />

endotheilum as well as a thickened basement<br />

membrane.<br />

Guttata – “Spotted, speckled, or drop-like”<br />

Direct illumination of<br />

advanced Corneal<br />

guttata<br />

Elaphe<br />

Guttata<br />

A damaged endothelium has a reduced ability<br />

to pump water out of the stroma<br />

Fluid accumulates between the fibrils of the<br />

stroma, resulting in edema<br />

Stromal edema results in blurry vision and a<br />

painful eye<br />

Guttata alone do not warrant a diagnosis of<br />

Fuch’s, stromal edema must be present<br />

Endothelial cell density<br />

is critical in<br />

maintaining a properly<br />

hydrated cornea.<br />

In children, the<br />

average density is<br />

3,000-4,00/mm 2<br />

In adults, cell density<br />

ranges from 1,000-<br />

2,000/mm 2<br />

In order to maintain a<br />

functioning<br />

endothelium, 500<br />

cells/mm 2 are needed<br />

The exact mechanism of endothelial cell loss is<br />

unknown, however, there are a number of<br />

theories:<br />

◦ Histology has shown increasing amounts of apoptotic<br />

endothelial cells in Fuch’s patients. These corneas<br />

also show decreased anti-apoptosis gene expression.<br />

◦ UV light (gets blamed for everything) has been shown<br />

to induce DNA damage to endothelial cells. The longer<br />

you live, the more UV you will have been exposed to.<br />

◦ Fuch’s corneas have shown to have reduced<br />

expression of the aquaproin-1 protein. This is an<br />

integral protein in pumping fluid out of the cornea.<br />

• Mouse models have shown that decreased aquaporin-1<br />

expression results in slower recovery times in edematous<br />

corneas<br />

Coursebook Page 3 of 139<br />

2


5/29/2012<br />

Other factors that result in decreased endothelial<br />

cell numbers (occur in otherwise normal eyes):<br />

◦ Age<br />

◦ Previous ocular surgery<br />

◦ Ocular trauma or infection<br />

◦ Angle closure glaucoma<br />

◦ Pseudoexfoliation<br />

◦ Long-term contact lens wear<br />

◦ Sex- Filipino men had lower endothelial cells counts than<br />

women<br />

◦ Diabetes<br />

• 10 years or more results in decreased endothelial cell<br />

numbers and morphological changes.<br />

• Endothelial cell loss after phacoemulsification is higher in<br />

diabetics than normals<br />

While not all Fuch’s patients progress to<br />

bullous keratopathy, the risk for significant<br />

corneal damage such as that in PBK is real.<br />

Swelling of the cornea as a result of<br />

iotrogenic trauma to ocular tissues.<br />

PBK results in an extremely painful eye with<br />

significant reduction in visual function.<br />

Edema can be present in the stroma and the<br />

epithelium<br />

◦ Epithelial edema results<br />

in bullae, which are<br />

essentially corneal<br />

blisters.<br />

Subjective<br />

◦ Decreased vision<br />

◦ Pain<br />

◦ Epiphora<br />

◦ Foreign body sensation<br />

◦ Photophobia<br />

◦ Recent cataract surgery<br />

Patients with PBK can present with mild to<br />

severe findings on physical examination<br />

Corneal findings:<br />

◦ Corneal guttata<br />

◦ Folds in Descemet’s Membrane<br />

◦ Stromal edema<br />

◦ Stromal haze<br />

◦ Epithelial edema<br />

◦ Bullae- may be ruptured<br />

◦ Corneal neovascularization<br />

Coursebook Page 4 of 139<br />

3


5/29/2012<br />

Other Ocular Findings:<br />

◦ Cells/flare in anterior<br />

chamber<br />

◦ Subluxed IOL<br />

◦ Shunt tube w/ current or<br />

previous endothelial touch<br />

◦ Elevated IOP<br />

◦ Cystoid macular edema (CME)<br />

has been associated with PBK,<br />

especially in patients with an<br />

anterior chamber IOL<br />

As is the case with most conditions,<br />

treatment depends on the severity of the<br />

disease in each patient.<br />

Mild cases may respond to medical therapy,<br />

while moderate to severe cases often require<br />

surgery.<br />

Mild<br />

◦ Edema<br />

• Muro 128 (NaCl 5%) gtts QID<br />

• Muro 128 (NaCl 5%) ung QHS<br />

◦ Elevated IOP<br />

• Antiglacuoma medications<br />

• Avoid prostaglandin analogues to reduce risk of CME<br />

◦ CME<br />

• Treat as with other cases of CME<br />

Surgical procedures are dependent on the<br />

severity of the patient’s condition as well as<br />

their visual potential.<br />

Penetrating Keratoplasty Diagram<br />

If a patient is a cataract surgery candidate<br />

and has Fuch’s, measures must be taken to<br />

protect the cornea.<br />

For healthy corneas with guttata, viscoelastic<br />

should be used<br />

◦ Most surgeons use the soft-shell technique<br />

• Combines cohesive and dispersive viscoelastic<br />

◦ Viscoelastic protects the endothelium from the<br />

energy released during phacoemulsification as well<br />

as the trauma that is incurred during surgery<br />

Corneas with stromal edema take special care<br />

and consideration when cataract surgery is to<br />

be performed.<br />

If CCT is greater than 640um, a “Triple”<br />

procedure may be considered<br />

◦ Triple= Phacoemulsification+IOL implantation+cornea transplant<br />

If the patient elects for CE without a<br />

transplant, they MUST be educated that they<br />

will likely need one in the future.<br />

Coursebook Page 5 of 139<br />

4


5/29/2012<br />

For patients that qualify, the triple procedure<br />

is preferred-<br />

◦ One trip to operating room<br />

• Reduces cost<br />

• Less discomfort for patient<br />

• Low risk for future corneal decompensation<br />

◦ Cataract removed<br />

◦ Surgery is the only true definitive treatment for<br />

Fuch’s<br />

Penetrating Keratoplasty (PKP) is a full-thickness<br />

corneal transplant. Previously, it was the only<br />

surgical treatment for patients with advanced<br />

Fuch’s or PBK.<br />

PKP may be indicated in a plethora of conditions:<br />

• Fuch’s<br />

• PBK<br />

• Keratoconus<br />

• Failed grafts<br />

• Scarring<br />

• Corneal thinning<br />

• Corneal perforations<br />

While more surgeons are familiar with PKP,<br />

there are a fair amount of downsides to it…<br />

• Even in uncomplicated cases, Post-op is very<br />

involved -<br />

• Topical corticosteroids<br />

• QID*1mo<br />

• QD*6mo<br />

• Q o D *6mo<br />

• This may be altered (usually increased)<br />

• Systemic steroids or other immunosuppressants may<br />

be warranted as well<br />

• Endophthalmitis- most dreaded complication<br />

• Treated aggressively<br />

• Epithelial downgrowth<br />

• Wound Leak- requires immediate intervention<br />

• Epithelial defects (usually resolve w/ lubrication after a<br />

few weeks)<br />

• Glaucoma due to:<br />

• Infectious keratitis<br />

• Crystalline keratitis – usually 2’ streptococcus near suture<br />

• Graft rejection<br />

• 50% of rejection occurs w/in 6 mo<br />

• The rest usually occur w/in the next 6 mo<br />

• Most common type is also the most serious: Endothelial<br />

rejection<br />

• Tx= Repeat transplant<br />

• 10% are epithelial<br />

Nowadays, PKP is not always considered firstline<br />

treatment, and is more of a last-resort<br />

for PBK patients in the U.S.<br />

Newer techniques are proving to be quite<br />

effective and tend to have fewer side effects<br />

and less severe complications<br />

We will review some of the well-established<br />

procedures and introduce a few new ones as<br />

well<br />

DALK = Deep Anterior Lamellar Keratoplasty<br />

DSEK= Descemet Stripping Endothelial<br />

Keratoplasty<br />

◦ DSAEK= Descemet Stripping Automated Endothelial<br />

Keratoplasty<br />

◦ FS-DSEK= Femtosecond DSEK<br />

DMEK= Descemet Membrane Endothelial<br />

Keratoplasty<br />

◦ Transplantation of Decemet’s membrane and<br />

endothelium only<br />

PTK = Phototherapeutic Keratectomy<br />

Coursebook Page 6 of 139<br />

5


5/29/2012<br />

Began in 2003<br />

Descemet’s Membrane and endothelium is<br />

removed from the host cornea<br />

Small portion of posterior stroma along with<br />

Descemet’s and endothelium are harvested<br />

and transplanted on posterior surface of host<br />

cornea<br />

DSEK<br />

No corneal surface incisions<br />

Little post-op astigmatism<br />

Fewer suture related problems<br />

Less wound dehiscence<br />

Better, less variable visual<br />

outcomes<br />

Low rates of graft rejection<br />

Usually done after cataract surgery<br />

Higher endothelial density longterm<br />

PKP<br />

Significant corneal incisions<br />

High and variable astigmatism<br />

High rates of suture problems<br />

Wound dehiscence<br />

Variable, poor visual outcomes<br />

Higher (double) graft rejection<br />

rates<br />

Done before cataract surgery<br />

Lower cell denisty<br />

In Koenig’s study, patients went from an<br />

average of 20/100 preoperatively to 20/40<br />

postoperatively @ 6 months.<br />

DSEK and DSAEK have shown promising longterm<br />

outcomes.<br />

◦ Li’s study showed steady improvement in BCVA<br />

from 6-12 months, from 12-24 months, and from<br />

24-36 months, with a mean BCVA of 20/25.<br />

◦ Ratanasit et al. showed 75% of patients were<br />

20/20-20/40 @ 5 years, and not one patient lost<br />

vision.<br />

Successful In vitro<br />

Descemet’s Membrane<br />

transplantation in 1998,<br />

2002<br />

Descemet’s and<br />

endothelium removed<br />

from both host and<br />

donor.<br />

Both Descemet’s and<br />

endothelium are<br />

transplanted to host<br />

cornea<br />

No stroma<br />

In vivo DMEK in 2006<br />

◦ Single case- 20/20 vision<br />

one week post-op<br />

DMEK carries most of the same risks as DSEK<br />

DMEK patients are more likely to experience a<br />

graft dislocation.<br />

◦ Over 50% of patients had a dislocation<br />

◦ In DMEK, dislocations are partial<br />

◦ Partial dislocations require re-bubbling and are<br />

relatively simple to correct<br />

Price et al (60 eyes, two surgeons, both were<br />

brand new to DMEK)<br />

◦ Mean BCVA was 20/30 @ one month<br />

• 84% were 20/40 or better<br />

◦ Mean BCVA @ 3 months was 20/25<br />

• 94% were 20/40 or better<br />

• 63% were 20/25 or better<br />

Coursebook Page 7 of 139<br />

6


5/29/2012<br />

DMEK<br />

Better refractive predictability<br />

DSEK<br />

Fair predictability – Host stroma<br />

adds to corneal thickness<br />

Thinner post-op CCT (528um) Thicker post-op CCT (650um)<br />

Endothelial cell density equal ---<br />

Tearing of donor tissue<br />

Less likely to tear<br />

Can use one donor cornea for<br />

DMEK + DALK<br />

No hyaluronic acid- lower<br />

host/donor interface issues<br />

Lower start-up cost<br />

Can only use donor cornea for<br />

DSEK<br />

Need to use hyaluronic acid<br />

Higher start-up cost<br />

(microkeratom)<br />

Done by many corneal surgeons<br />

Fewer experienced surgeons<br />

Partial graft detachments common Graft detachment rare (2-3%)<br />

Using 20/40 or better @ 6-12 months<br />

post-op as a benchmark:<br />

38-100% of DSEK pts<br />

◦ Few reach 20/25<br />

40% of PKP pts<br />

95% of DMEK pts<br />

◦ 75% reached 20/25<br />

◦ Most are 20/40 on the day of surgery<br />

Post-op endothelial cell density is reduced in<br />

both DSEK and DMEK. This is due to (1) cell loss<br />

during dissection and (2) endothelial damage<br />

while the graft is being handled before and<br />

during surgery.<br />

DMEK and DSEK are comparable in cell counts<br />

◦ 25-54% loss 6 mo Post op in DSEK<br />

◦ 24-61% 1 yr post op in DSEK<br />

◦ 30% loss at 1 yr in DMEK<br />

◦ 40% 1 yr post op in PKP<br />

Even with all the cell loss, most corneas are well<br />

above the 500/mm 2 cutoff.<br />

For patients with limited visual potential<br />

unrelated to the cornea, phototherapuetic<br />

keratectomy (PTK) is a good option for pain<br />

management.<br />

Collagen cross-linking has shown some<br />

potential for pain management, but longterm<br />

results are lacking.<br />

It may be possible to inject prepared<br />

endothlial cells into the anterior chamber as<br />

they have shown the ability to migrate onto<br />

the posterior surface of the cornea.<br />

PKP is well-established, but has more serious<br />

and frequent complications and poorer visual<br />

outcomes<br />

DSEK/DSAEK provides for predictable<br />

outcomes but requires a long wait-time<br />

before visual acuity is optimal<br />

DMEK is new and looks promising, however<br />

there are few surgeons who will do it and<br />

graft dislocations are common.<br />

PBK causes painful vision loss<br />

It is largely avoidable<br />

Careful examination, proper patient<br />

education, and appropriate surgical care are<br />

necessary to avoid PBK<br />

DSEK is the most common option for<br />

treatment of PBK or use in a tirple procedure<br />

DMEK has shown very promising results and<br />

will be implemented in many surgical centers<br />

Coursebook Page 8 of 139<br />

7


5/29/2012<br />

Ehlers, Justis P., et al. The Wills Eye Manual: Office and Emergency Room <strong>Diagnosis</strong><br />

and Treatment of Eye Disease, Fifth Edition. Baltimore, Lippincott Williams &<br />

Wilkins, 2008.<br />

Ghanem, Santhiago, Berti, Thomaz, Netto “Collagen crosslinkin with riboflavin and<br />

ultraviolet-A in eyes with pseudophakic bullous keratopathy.” Journal of Cataract<br />

& Refractive<br />

Surgery. 36.2. (2010).<br />

Kanski, Jack J. Clinical Opthalmology: A Sytematic Approach, Seventh Edition.<br />

Elsevier Saunders, 2011.<br />

Koenig, Steven B., Covert, Douglas J., Dupps, William J., Meisler, Daivd M. “Visual<br />

Acuity, Refractive Error, and Endothelial Cell Density Six Months After Descemet<br />

Stripping and Automated Endothelial Keratoplasty (DSAEK).” Cornea. 26.6 (2007).<br />

Li, Jennifer Y., Terry, Mark A., Goshe, Jeffrey, Davis-Boozer, David, Shamie, Neda. “<br />

Three-Year Visual Acuity Outcomes after Descemet’s Stripping Automated<br />

Endothelial Keratoplasty.” Ophthalmology. March 2012.<br />

Lin, Pei-Yu, Wu, Chih-Chiau, Lee, Shui-Mei. “Combined phototherapeutic<br />

keratectomy and therapeutic contact lens for recurrent erosions in bullous<br />

keratopathy. British Journal of Ophthalmology. 85 (2001).<br />

Milla, Elena, Verges, Carlos, Cipres, Maricruz. “Corneal Endothelium Evaluation<br />

After Phacoemulsification With Continuous Anterior Chamber Infusion.”Cornea.<br />

24.3 (2005).<br />

Price, Marianne O., Giebel, Arthur W., Fairchild, Kelly M., Price, Francis W.<br />

“Descemet’s Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty: Prospective Multicenter Study of<br />

Visual and Refractive Outcomes and Endothelial Survival.” Ophthalmology. 116.12<br />

(2009).<br />

Ratanasit, Arlene, Gorovoy, Mark S. “Long-term Results of Decemet Stripping<br />

Automated Endothelial Keratoplasty.” Cornea. 30.12 (2011).<br />

Rosado-Adames, Noel, Afshari, Natalie A. Current Opinion in Ophthalmology. 23.1<br />

(2012).<br />

Remington, Lee Ann. Clinical Anatomy of the Visual System, Second Edition. T.<br />

Louis. Elsevier, 2005.<br />

Ruggeri, A, Grisan, E., Jaroszeski, J. “A new system for the automatic estimation of<br />

endothelial cell density in donor corneas.” British Journal of Ophthalmology. 89<br />

(2005).<br />

Seitzman, Gerami D. “Cataract Surgery in Fuch’s Dystrophy.” Current Opinion in<br />

Ophthalmology. 16 (2005).<br />

Wollensak, Aurich, Wirbelauer, Pham. “Potential Use of Riboflavin/UVA Cross-<br />

Linking in Bullous Keratopathy.” Ophthalmic Research. 41.2 (2009).<br />

Coursebook Page 9 of 139<br />

8


5/29/2012<br />

A Case Presentation<br />

Case Presentation<br />

Introduction to Stromal keratitis<br />

• Immune Stromal Keratitis (ISK) defined<br />

• Necrotizing versus Non-necrotizing<br />

Pathophysiology of the disease<br />

Epidemiology<br />

Workup<br />

Landmark Studies – HEDS I and II<br />

Current therapies<br />

• Including surgery<br />

Conclusion/Clinical Pearls<br />

65 YOWM new patient presented for a<br />

consult for a CVE<br />

The consult was placed by their PCP for<br />

vision changes thought to be related to<br />

hyperbaric O2 treatments 2/2 a bleeding<br />

bladder from radiation cystitis<br />

• Vet was initially given radiation therapy for<br />

prostate cancer<br />

• Last tx received 04/11- total of 40 tx that started<br />

in 02/11<br />

Overview: Hyperbaric oxygen therapy<br />

(HBOT) is breathing 100% oxygen while<br />

under increased atmospheric pressure<br />

HBOT is generally performed daily for a<br />

minimum of 30 treatments<br />

• Treatment is typically at 2 to 2.4 ATA for a total<br />

of 90 minutes<br />

• ATA = atmosphere absolute<br />

• 1 ATA= atmospheric pressure at sea level<br />

Delayed radiation injury (soft tissue and<br />

bony necrosis) **<br />

Diabetic retinopathy<br />

Diabetic foot<br />

Carbon monoxide poisoning<br />

Decompression sickness<br />

Selected problem wounds<br />

Coursebook Page 10 of 139<br />

1


5/29/2012<br />

Increase in myopia*<br />

Improvement in hyperopia<br />

Vision changes more common after 20<br />

treatments and in patients >40 years old<br />

This is usually temporary and in the<br />

majority of patients, vision returns to its<br />

pre-treatment level about six weeks after<br />

the cessation of therapy<br />

CC: Decreased vision at distance OU, that<br />

occurred suddenly after receiving O2 treatments<br />

LEE: ~ 08/11 with Dr. X (a non-VA provider);<br />

07/13/11 CVE at the Portland VAMC<br />

Current Ocular Medications: Prednisone TID OS<br />

prescribed initially by Dr. X for an “abrasion”<br />

and a “viral infection” that he has been using<br />

intermittently since ~08/11 (renewed by his PCP)<br />

– had been off for 1 month and was about to<br />

restart<br />

Personal OHx: corneal abrasion OS with a<br />

viral infection dx ~8/11<br />

Family OHx: Unremarkable<br />

Pertinent Medical Conditions: DM II,<br />

COPD, Vitamin D deficiency, prostate<br />

cancer<br />

Autorefractor:<br />

• RE:-1.25-0.75x091 LE:-1.75-1.00x013<br />

Current Spec Rx: Bifocals<br />

• RE:-0.50DS 20/60 PH:20/40<br />

• LE:-0.25-0.75x033 20/150 PH:20/80<br />

• ADD:+2.50<br />

Pupils: PERRL (-)APD OU<br />

EOMS:FROM OU<br />

CF:FTFC OU<br />

SLE:<br />

• L/L: BE: flakes, lower lid laxity w/ mild proptosis<br />

• Conj: BE: Ping N&T LE:1+ diffuse injection temp<br />

• Cornea:BE: arcus 360 w/ krukenberg spindles<br />

• LE: central areas of white patchy stromal haze<br />

• Sectoral deep stromal NV from ~3:00-5:00<br />

• Central folds and SEI, bullae superior cornea<br />

• (+)staining over the neo with stromal filling<br />

• A/C: Deep and Quiet OU<br />

• Iris: Normal w/o NVI OU<br />

• Tonomtery by Applanation: 15/16 @ 15:48<br />

Coursebook Page 11 of 139<br />

2


5/29/2012<br />

DFE:<br />

Periphery: Attached 360 w/o holes/tears<br />

Lens: RE: 1+ milky NS w/ vacuoles LE:1-2+<br />

milky NS<br />

Vitreous: BE: syneresis<br />

Optic Nerve C/D ratio: RE:0.35 rd HRT<br />

LE:0.40 shallow HRT<br />

Macula: Flat and Dry OU LE: hazy view 2/2<br />

cornea<br />

Vessels:1:2 with moderate tortuosity and<br />

threadlike arterioles<br />

1)Left Eye Stromal Keratitis with stromal<br />

edema – likely related to Herpes virus<br />

per patient history with Dr. X<br />

2)Bilateral Nuclear Sclerotic Cataracts<br />

3)Diabetes Type II without retinopathy<br />

OU<br />

4)Bilateral Retinal Vascular Changes –<br />

likely related to hyperbaric treatments<br />

received back in April<br />

Coursebook Page 12 of 139<br />

3


5/29/2012<br />

1)Prescribed oral Acyclovir 800mg 5X/day<br />

for 1 month<br />

• Viroptic 5x/day OS<br />

• Pred acetate 1% q2h OS<br />

• A referral to Portland VAMC for a corneal consult<br />

• Vet from Astoria, OR and would not be able to f/u in<br />

Walla Walla<br />

2-4)Baseline photos were taken, will<br />

monitor.<br />

HPI: Vet reports symptoms started a year ago, with blurry<br />

vision, pain and redness in the left eye<br />

He was treated for an eye infection with numerous gtts (he<br />

thinks herpes)<br />

He denies any rash or eyelid lesions at the time<br />

He had a recurrence after 3 months. He was seen in Walla<br />

Walla, and was treated for HSV keratitis<br />

His symptoms resolved after 2 weeks of treatment<br />

Today he is pain free, but noted continued blurry vision in<br />

both eyes. He was referred for evaluation by corneal<br />

specialist to r/o interstitial keratitis OS<br />

Habitual Rx Acuity:<br />

• RE:20/100+1 PH:20/40-2 LE:20/400 PH:20/80<br />

Pupils: Dilated OU<br />

EOMS: FROM OU<br />

Cover Test: No tropia<br />

CF: FTFC OU<br />

Ocular Medications: PF OS 5x per day,<br />

Ocuflox TID OS, viroptic 5x/day OS,<br />

acyclovir 800mg po 5x/day<br />

SLE:<br />

• L/L: No lesions OU<br />

• Cornea: RE: WNL, +KS<br />

• LE: trc PEE, IT pannus 1mm beyond limbus<br />

• 1+ subepi haze<br />

• 1+ diffuse stromal haze most prominent IT extending centrally<br />

• Deep stromal NV IT<br />

• Conj: 1+ diffuse injection<br />

• AC: Deep and quiet<br />

• Iris: WNL (-)NVI<br />

• Tonometry: 14/14 @<br />

DFE: Same as previous exam<br />

OCT Scan: RE:261, no IRF/SRF LE:267, no IRF/SRF<br />

1)Corneal Opacity, OS<br />

• With extension to visual axis, and poor visual acuity (20/80)<br />

• Possible interstitial keratitis, in the setting of presumed HSV keratitis, and<br />

history of atopy (exzema)<br />

• PPD negative<br />

• Reports history of risk factors for syphillis<br />

• Check RPR, ANA, RF, Lyme, EBV, ESR<br />

• Continue PF, viroptic, ofloxacin, acyclovir<br />

• F/U with cornea fellow next week<br />

2)DM II, no retinopathy OU<br />

• No CSME<br />

• Continue good glycemic index<br />

• Continue annual exams<br />

3)Pigment Dispersion Syndrome, OU<br />

• Stable IOP, nerves intact<br />

4)Cataract OU<br />

• Monitor.<br />

Habitual RX Acuity:<br />

RE:20/60-2 PH:20/30-2, LE:20/80-2 PH:20/40-2<br />

Pupils: 2/3 (-)APD<br />

SLE:<br />

• L/L: No lesions OU<br />

• Cornea:<br />

• RE: Epi intact, trc subepi haze, +KS<br />

• LE: Decreased corneal sensation, +KS<br />

• Conj: White and Quiet OU<br />

• A/C: deep and quiet OU<br />

• Iris: TIDs peripherally OU<br />

• Tonometry: 15/14 @ <br />

Coursebook Page 13 of 139<br />

4


5/29/2012<br />

1)presumed HSV stromal keratitis OS.<br />

Clincal appearance consistent. RPR, ANA,<br />

RF, EBV, ESR, wnl.<br />

• h/o atopy<br />

• Continue PF qid<br />

• Reduce acyclovir to 400mg po bid<br />

• d/c viroptic<br />

• d/c ocuflox<br />

• Return 4 wks, MRx next visit<br />

Herpes Simplex Type I and Type II<br />

Cytomegalovirus<br />

Epstein-Barr Virus<br />

VZV<br />

Ocular herpes affects each corneal layer differently<br />

and can vary in presentation as categorized below:<br />

• Corneal epithelial disease<br />

• Dendritic keratitis<br />

• Geographic (ameboid) ulcer<br />

• Marginal keratitis (limbitis)<br />

• Corneal Stromal Disease**<br />

• Necrotizing<br />

• Non-Necrotizing<br />

• Disciform, immune rings, limbal vasculitis<br />

• Endothelitis<br />

• Neurotrophic keratopathy 4,5<br />

Management depends on the layer affected<br />

By definition - “Immune” refers to the fact that<br />

typically at this corneal level, the virus has been<br />

reactivated and the patient has developed an<br />

immunity/humoral response<br />

The immune reaction represents a delayed<br />

hypersensitivity reaction by T lymphocytes to<br />

viral antigen<br />

There are two types of ISK that may occur during<br />

herpes infection:<br />

• Necrotizing and Non-necrotizing<br />

Presenting signs and symptoms:<br />

• Reduced vision<br />

• Pain<br />

• Photophobia<br />

• Lacrimation<br />

• Blepharospasm<br />

• Decreased corneal sensation<br />

Presentation may be either unilateral or<br />

bilateral<br />

A history of prior episodes in patients with<br />

recurrent disease may exist<br />

There may be single or multiple patches of infiltration and inflammation<br />

within the corneal stroma<br />

<br />

Typically concurrent stromal edema<br />

Stromal neovascularization may be present but is not necessary for the<br />

diagnosis<br />

<br />

The overlying epithelium is usually intact<br />

If there is epithelial disruption, it will be much smaller in area than the<br />

underlying inflammation<br />

The inflammatory deposits are thought to represent complexes of viral<br />

antigen with antibodies and complement – may take the form of a ring<br />

infiltrate (Wessely ring)<br />

<br />

<br />

Secondary anterior uveitis may be present<br />

Endothelial folds and keratic precipitates are common<br />

Coursebook Page 14 of 139<br />

5


5/29/2012<br />

Corneal thinning - secondary to chronic<br />

inflammation<br />

Corneal Scarring – secondary to stromal<br />

neovascularization that can result in<br />

profound vision loss**<br />

Fibrosis, pannus, and lipid deposits from<br />

stromal neovascularization<br />

Occurs in 20-60% of eyes with recurrent HSV, and<br />

90% of recurrent stromal keratitis 3,4<br />

It does not usually move toward ulceration and<br />

perforation<br />

Untreated non-necrotizing ISK runs a self-limiting<br />

course over several months; however if left<br />

untreated severe vascularization and scarring<br />

can result in profound vision loss thus treatment<br />

is indicated 7<br />

More severe form of herpetic stromal keratitis<br />

• Manifests as dense, cheesy, yellow-white stromal infiltration<br />

• Epithelial ulceration<br />

• Stromal edema<br />

• Dense vascularization<br />

• Profound corneal thinning<br />

• Possible perforation (major complication)**<br />

The use of topical corticosteroids without antiviral<br />

coverage may be a possible risk factor for its<br />

development<br />

It is much less common than the non-necrotizing type<br />

Coursebook Page 15 of 139<br />

6


5/29/2012<br />

Occurs mainly by 2 mechanisms:<br />

1) Reactivation of the virus in the trigeminal<br />

ganglion<br />

• Migrates down the nerve axon to replicate and<br />

infect ocular tissue<br />

2) The cornea itself<br />

• The virus may subsist latently within corneal tissue<br />

(stromal keratocytes) and reactivate<br />

• May also cause donor-derived HSV disease in<br />

transplanted corneas<br />

Conditions causing ISK include:<br />

• Herpes simplex and zoster<br />

• Epstein-Barr virus<br />

• Syphillis<br />

• Tuberculosis<br />

• Lyme disease<br />

• Mumps and measles<br />

• Acanthamoebe<br />

• Sarcoidosis<br />

• Onchocerciasis<br />

• Idiopathic<br />

The most common cause of active ISK is the herpes<br />

simplex virus, accounting for 70% of unilateral<br />

cases 2<br />

Frequency<br />

• United States<br />

• 80-90% of the US population has been infected with the<br />

herpes virus – many with no history of clinical herpes<br />

• ~ 20,000 new cases of ocular HSV occur annually<br />

• >28,000 reactivations occur annually<br />

• ~24% - 36% of patients with ocular disease will<br />

experience recurrence within 2-5 years after the first<br />

episode***<br />

• International<br />

• An estimated 1/3 of the population worldwide suffers<br />

from recurrent infections 7<br />

Mortality/Morbidity<br />

• HSV keratitis IS THE MOST FREQUENT cause of corneal<br />

blindness in the United States<br />

• A leading indication for corneal transplantation<br />

• Most common cause of infectious blindness in the<br />

Western world<br />

Age<br />

• Affects mainly adults, and occurs many years after the<br />

primary infection<br />

• In children it involves the corneal epithelium<br />

• Risk of binocular disease<br />

• A high recurrence rate<br />

• Amblyopia<br />

Corneal Abrasion<br />

Recurrent Corneal Erosion<br />

Herpes Zoster<br />

Bacterial Keratitis<br />

Fungal Keratitis<br />

Interstitial Keratitis<br />

Keratoconjunctivitis Sicca<br />

Corneal Ulcer<br />

Coursebook Page 16 of 139<br />

7


5/29/2012<br />

<strong>Diagnosis</strong> is primarily made based<br />

on clinical features of the corneal<br />

lesion **<br />

Epithelial scrapings with Giemsa<br />

stain:<br />

• Show multinucleated giant cells<br />

• Which are coalesced infected<br />

corneal epithelial cells and<br />

intranuclear viral inclusions 7<br />

viral DNA can be detected in the:<br />

• Corneal epithelium<br />

• Conjunctiva<br />

• Skin<br />

• Anterior chamber tap<br />

Negative cytology results do not<br />

exclude HSV infection<br />

Classic case of a multinucleated herpes simplex virus-infected cell 17<br />

Enzyme-linked virus inducible system<br />

(ELVIS)<br />

• Very specific for detecting herpes virus<br />

• Results in 24hrs!<br />

ELVIS test result is negative<br />

• Cell culture for confirmation is recommended<br />

Cultures obtained within several days of onset, prior to<br />

antiviral therapy give a sensitivity of up to 70%<br />

Enzyme immunoassay (EIA) tests can be<br />

performed in the office<br />

• HerpChek<br />

The Captia test (Trinity Biotech) is a<br />

blood test to detect antibodies to the HSV<br />

• Unlike other tests it can differentiate between<br />

HSV -1 and HSV-2<br />

Combined CORTICOSTEROID and antiviral therapy –<br />

• Viroptic or Zirgan and Pred acetate 1%<br />

• Acyclovir 3% ophthalmic ointment is available in Europe but not in the US<br />

• Cycloplegia and topical lubricants are used to ease patient discomfort<br />

Dosing<br />

• Viroptic (trifluridine 1%) dosing – q2h up to a maximum 9x/day for 7-14 days, then QID for<br />

1-2 days after complete epitheliazation (not to exceed 21 days due to toxicity)<br />

<br />

• Zirgan (ganciclovir 0.15%)- q3h up to 5x/day typically 7-10 days–then taper to 1-3x/day<br />

for 7 days<br />

• Pred acetate 1% q1-2h initially then tapered<br />

One common recommendation is:<br />

• Equal frequency of topical antiviral with a corticosteroid<br />

Conducted by the National Eye Institute<br />

Herpetic Eye Disease Study (HEDS) I – 1996<br />

• Focused on stromal keratitis treatment<br />

• Anti-viral alone<br />

• Anti-viral + corticosteroid<br />

• Anti-viral + corticosteroid + acyclovir<br />

Herpetic Eye Disease Study (HEDS) II- 1998<br />

• Focused on epithelial disease<br />

• Looked at early treatment with acyclovir if it prevented progression to stromal<br />

disease<br />

• Patients with previous HSV disease not active within 30 days, if longterm<br />

low dose treatment with acyclovir prevented recurrence<br />

Focused on stromal keratitis (3 groups)<br />

• Anti-viral alone<br />

• Anti-viral + corticosteroid<br />

• Anti-viral + corticosteroid + acyclovir<br />

Results<br />

1. Duration of inflammation and risk of progression were<br />

significantly reduced in patient’s receiving prednisolone<br />

2. The rate of epithelial HSV recurrence was not increased<br />

3. The addition of oral acyclovir to topical corticosteroid and<br />

topical antivirals provided no additional benefit**<br />

• The role of external factors in triggering recurrence<br />

Coursebook Page 17 of 139<br />

8


5/29/2012<br />

<br />

3 Main Studies:<br />

1. Acute Epithelial HSV Keratitis<br />

Study:<br />

• Early tx with oral acyclovir<br />

prevented progression to stromal<br />

disease<br />

2. Acyclovir Prevention Trial:<br />

• If long-term tx with low dose oral<br />

acyclovir (400mg BIDx1yr)<br />

prevented recurrence<br />

3. Ocular HSV Recurrence Factor<br />

Study – looked at triggers<br />

• Patients filled out questionnaires<br />

every week for 52 weeks to track<br />

acute and chronic stressors<br />

<br />

Results:<br />

1. There was no benefit from<br />

addition of oral acyclovir to<br />

preventing progression to<br />

stromal keratitis<br />

2. 41% reduction that any ocular<br />

herpetic disease would recur<br />

• 50% reduction in stromal keratitis<br />

3. There are no results available<br />

yet<br />

Topical cyclosporin A 0.05% showed some<br />

effectiveness in cases of HSK resistant to<br />

corticosteroids<br />

• It improves visual acuity<br />

• Reduces inflammation and lesion size<br />

• Regression of corneal stromal neovascularization 12<br />

• Contraindicated with active epithelial herpes keratitis<br />

Antiangiogenic agents, such as Avastin<br />

A therapeutic vaccine designed to boost<br />

protective CD8 T-cell population within HSV<br />

latently affected ganglia<br />

A triple-drug therapy targeting viral<br />

replication with:<br />

• Oral acyclovir<br />

• Topical cyclosporin A<br />

• Anti-VEGF<br />

Randomized clinical trials needed<br />

Penetrating Keratoplasty (PK)*<br />

Deep Anterior Lamellar Keratoplasty<br />

(DALK)<br />

• Assumes healthy endothelium intact<br />

• Not preferred secondary to viral latency in stromal<br />

keratocytes<br />

Conjunctival flap<br />

• Still performed on select patients, not as common<br />

• Helps quiet down an inflamed eye<br />

• PK may still be performed through the flap<br />

During active HSV infection AVOID<br />

transplantation<br />

• Unless perforation is eminent<br />

Corneal neovascularization is the main<br />

risk factor for immune rejection<br />

• Recent studies show that topical and<br />

subconjunctival bevacizumab (Avastin) is<br />

effective in regressing neovascularization in<br />

these patients 12<br />

Prophylaxis with oral acyclovir<br />

• Improves corneal graft survival<br />

• Famciclovir and valacyclovir may be as effective<br />

but have not been studied<br />

Topical treatment with Zirgan given it’s<br />

safety profile<br />

Coursebook Page 18 of 139<br />

9


5/29/2012<br />

Non-Necrotizing ISK<br />

• Treat with topical anti-viral (Viroptic or Zirgan) and Pred<br />

Acetate 1% with equal frequency until the steroid is<br />

tapered down to BID or QD<br />

• Add oral acyclovir AFTER the virus is inactive without<br />

treatment for 30 days – 400mg BID x 1 year<br />

Necrotizing ISK<br />

• Perforation likely eminent requiring a corneal transplant<br />

• Use oral acyclovir to prevent graft rejection<br />

• Zirgan should also be considered to prevent rejection<br />

• Restasis and Avastin are new treatments to consider as<br />

well<br />

1. Latham , Emi. "Hyperbaric Oxygen Therapy." Medscape Reference.<br />

WebMD LLC, 19052010. Web. 27 Apr 2012.<br />

.<br />

2. Onofrey B, Skorin L, Holdeman N. Ocular Therapeutics Handbook: A<br />

Clinical Manual. 3. Philadelphia; Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, 2011.<br />

198-204. Print.<br />

3. Sugar, Alan. "Herpes Simplex Keratitis." UpToDate. N.p., 11/11/2011.<br />

Web. 30 Apr 2012. .<br />

4. Schwartz GS, Harrison AR, Holland EJ. “Etiology of immune stromal<br />

(interstitial) keratitis.” Cornea. 1998; 17(3):278-81<br />

5. Krachmer J, Mannis M, Holland E. Cornea. 2. 1. Philadelphia: Elsevier<br />

Mosby, 2005. 1048-1066. Print.<br />

6. Dr. Hetrick’s book<br />

7. Sowka J, Gurwood A, Kabat A. “Immune Stromal (Interstital) Keratitis.”<br />

Handbook of Ocular Disease Management. N.p.; n.d. Web. 4 March 2012.<br />

.<br />

8. Wang, J. “Ophthalmologic Manifestations of Herpes Simplex Keratitis.”<br />

Medscape Reference. WebMD LLC., 18 Nov 2010. Web. 3 March 2012.<br />

.<br />

9. Wilhelmus KR, Gee L, Hauck WW, et al. “Herpetic Eye Disease Study. A controlled trial<br />

of topical corticosteroids for herpes simplex stromal keratitis.” Ophthalmology.<br />

1994;101(12):1883-95.<br />

10. Barron BA, Gee L, Hauck WW, et al. “Herpetic Eye Disease Study. A controlled trial of<br />

oral acyclovir for herpes simplex stromal keratitis.” Ophthalmology.<br />

1994;101(12):1871-82.<br />

11. Herpetic Eye Disease Study Group. “Predictors of recurrent herpes simplex virus<br />

keratitis.” Cornea. 2001;20(2):123-8.<br />

12. Herpetic Eye Disease Study Group. “Oral acyclovir for herpes simplex virus eye<br />

disease: effect on prevention of epithelial keratitis and stromal keratitis.” Arch<br />

Ophthalmol. 2000;118(8):1030-6.<br />

13. Herpetic Eye Disease Study Group. “Acyclovir for the prevention of recurrent herpes<br />

simplex virus eye disease.” N Engl J Med. 1998;339(5):300-6.<br />

14. Knickelbein J, Buela K, Hendricks R. “Herpes Stromal Keratitis: Erosion of Ocular<br />

Immune Privilege by Herpes Simplex Virus.” Future Virology, 5.6 (2010):699-708. Print.<br />

15. Saxena S, Sinha N. Keratoplasties- Surgical techniques and complications.<br />

Shanghai:InTech, 2012. 127-134. Print.<br />

16. Wilhelmus KR, Dawson CR, Barron BA, et al. “Risk factors for herpes simplex virus<br />

epithelial keratitis recurring during treatment of stromal keratitis or iridocyclitis.” Br J<br />

Ophthalmol 1996; 80:969-72.<br />

1-3) Latham , Emi. "Hyperbaric Oxygen Therapy." Medscape<br />

Reference. WebMD LLC, 19052010. Web. 27 Apr 2012.<br />

.<br />

4-8) Photos obtained from Wainwright Memorial VAMC Walla Walla,<br />

WA 03/24/12<br />

9-12)Photos obtained from various cartoon monster websites<br />

13,14)Photos obtained from <strong>Pacific</strong> Cataract and Laser Institute<br />

Kennewick, WA 03/14/12<br />

15)Herpes Simplex Stromal Necrotizing Keratitis- American<br />

Academy of Ophthalmology<br />

16)Trigeminal Nerve- wikipedia<br />

17)Multinucleated giant cells-<br />

<br />

18)Elvis photo- <br />

19) Conjunctival Flap photo-<br />

<br />

Coursebook Page 19 of 139<br />

10


5/31/2012<br />

Anna Griffith, O.D.<br />

<strong>Pacific</strong> <strong>University</strong> College of Optometry<br />

Resident in Vision Therapy, Rehabilitation and Pediatrics<br />

TBI Case<br />

• 33 y.o.<br />

• Involved in 9 blasts during combat<br />

• CC: Intermittent blur<br />

• HPI<br />

▫ OD>OS<br />

▫ All distances<br />

▫ Lasts 2 seconds - 1 minute<br />

▫ Eyestrain on the computer after 2-3 hours<br />

▫ Cannot see 3-D in movies, also cause nausea<br />

• Goals<br />

▫ Read again<br />

▫ Return to School for Electrical Engineering<br />

TBI Case<br />

• Other complaints<br />

▫ Difficulty finding things<br />

in crowded drawers or<br />

shelves<br />

▫ Extreme photosensitivity,<br />

some days much worse<br />

than others<br />

TBI Case: Medical History<br />

• Brain Contusion and<br />

Blood Clots seen on MRI<br />

• PTSD<br />

• HTN<br />

• GERD<br />

• Quitting Smoking<br />

0.5 pack/day x 10 years<br />

• Care giver<br />

• Acetaminophen prn<br />

• Diazepam<br />

• Docusate<br />

• Hydrocodone<br />

10/Acetaminophen<br />

• Mirtazapine<br />

• Nicotine Patch and Resin<br />

Complex<br />

• Omeprazole<br />

• Promethazine<br />

• Sumatriptan<br />

• Verapamil<br />

TBI Case: Exam Findings<br />

• OD: -2.50-0.75 x 030 OS: -2.50 DS<br />

• Distance Visual Acuity<br />

▫ OD: 20/20-1<br />

▫ OS: 20/20-1<br />

• Near Visual Acuity<br />

▫ OD: 20/25<br />

▫ OS: 20/20<br />

• EOMs: Full, unrestricted VF: FTFC<br />

• Pupils: PERRL-APD<br />

• Saccades: Quick and Accurate<br />

• Pursuits: Smooth and Accurate<br />

TBI Case: Exam Findings<br />

• Distance Cover Test: Ortho<br />

• Near Cover Test: 2 Exophoria<br />

• In-Phoropter Vertical Phoria: 1 BU OS<br />

• Red lens test: Fusion<br />

• Vertical Maddox Rod: (-) Vertical deviation<br />

• Fixation Disparity:<br />

▫ Horizontal: Type IV curve<br />

▫ Vertical Associated Phoria: 1^BU OS<br />

• Stereo: 30” Stereo with 1^BU OS: 20”<br />

Coursebook Page 20 of 139<br />

1


5/31/2012<br />

TBI Case: Accommodative Findings<br />

• Amplitude:<br />

▫ OD: 5.25/4.75D<br />

▫ OS: 5.00/4.75D<br />

• Accuracy: MEM (+0.50)<br />

• Facility: +/-2.00 flippers<br />

▫ 2.00D too difficult<br />

▫ 1.50D OD: 4.5cpm<br />

▫ 1.50D OS: 11cpm<br />

▫ 1.50D OU: Suppression<br />

• Binocular Cross-Cyl: +0.75 (varied +0.25 to+1.00)<br />

• NRA, PRA<br />

▫ +3.50/+2.75, -1.50/-1.25<br />

Accommodation/Vergence Relationship<br />

• Low PRA<br />

▫ Decreased accommodative amplitude and/or<br />

decreased negative fusional vergence (BI)<br />

• Low NRA<br />

▫ Reduced ability to relax accommodation and/or<br />

decreased positive fusional vergence (BO)<br />

TBI Case: Vergence Findings<br />

• Gross Convergence<br />

▫ 18 inches<br />

• Near Vergence Ranges<br />

▫ Phoropter: smooth, in-instrument<br />

• BO: 34/34/18<br />

• BI: 24/28/15<br />

▫ Prism bar: jump vergence, free-space<br />

• BO: 20/14<br />

• BI: 10/8<br />

TBI Case: Other Testing<br />

• Visual Midline Shift:<br />

Negative<br />

• DEM (Developmental Eye<br />

Movement test) Tests for<br />

Saccadic Dysfunction:<br />

H/V ratio: 7 th percentile<br />

TBI Case: Other Testing<br />

• Motor-Free Visual Perceptual Test, Edition 3<br />

(MVPT-3): Age equivalent: 18 years. Most<br />

difficulty with figure ground and form constancy<br />

TBI Case: Assessment and<br />

Recommendations<br />

• Assessment<br />

▫ Accommodative Insufficiency and Infacility<br />

▫ Gross Convergence Insufficiency (possibly<br />

secondary to accommodative dysfunction)<br />

▫ Decreased Visual Perceptual Skills<br />

• Recommendations<br />

▫ Vision therapy to improve visual efficiency and<br />

reduce symptoms<br />

▫ Re-evaluate vertical deviation<br />

Coursebook Page 21 of 139<br />

2


5/31/2012<br />

Accommodative Therapy:<br />

Near-Far Hart Chart<br />

• Monocular<br />

• Push up with near chart<br />

• Many variations<br />

• Can also be used for<br />

saccadic training<br />

• Goal: Accuracy, then<br />

speed<br />

Accommodative Therapy:<br />

Loose Lens Rock<br />

• Monocular<br />

• Target: sheet of words<br />

or groups of letters<br />

• Alternate viewing<br />

between (-) and (+)<br />

lens<br />

• Goal: -6.00/+2.50<br />

Accommodative Therapy:<br />

HTS (Home Therapy System)<br />

• Red/Blue Glasses<br />

create monocular<br />

fixation in a<br />

binocular field<br />

(MFBF)<br />

Accommodative Therapy:<br />

Binocular Accommodative Rock<br />

• Binocular: Bar readers<br />

and red/green or<br />

polaroid glasses for<br />

monitoring<br />

suppression<br />

• Use lens flipper<br />

Accommodative Therapy:<br />

Prolonged Reading<br />

• Monocular or Binocular<br />

• Bar readers<br />

• 2 minute adaptation<br />

period<br />

Convergence Therapy:<br />

Gross Convergence<br />

• Brock String<br />

▫ Push up<br />

▫ Bug on a String<br />

▫ Bead Jumps<br />

▫ Different FOG<br />

• Barrel Card<br />

http://www.flickr.com/photos/xooorx/6264870613/<br />

http://www.bernell.com/category/skeyword=barrel+card<br />

Coursebook Page 22 of 139<br />

3


5/31/2012<br />

Convergence Therapy:<br />

Smooth Vergence<br />

• Variable Vectogram<br />

• Variable Tranaglyph<br />

Convergence Therapy: Smooth<br />

Vergence<br />

• Computer Programs<br />

(HTS, VTS, Vision<br />

Builder)<br />

• Tromboning with<br />

Stereoscope<br />

http://www.visiontherapysolutions.net/co.php#7<br />

http://www.bernell.com<br />

Convergence Therapy:<br />

Jump Vergence<br />

• Fixed Tranaglyphs<br />

• Fixed Tranaglyphs<br />

• HTS, VTS, or Vision<br />

Builder<br />

Convergence Therapy:<br />

Jump Vergence<br />

• Loose Prism Rock<br />

• Look-aways with any<br />

vergence activity<br />

http://www.bernell.com<br />

• Computer Program<br />

Jump Vergence (HTS,<br />

VTS, Vision Builder<br />

http://www.bernell.com<br />

http://www.bernell.com<br />

Convergence Therapy:<br />

Free Space<br />

Eccentric Circles<br />

• Can be done in<br />

different fields of<br />

gaze and with<br />

motion<br />

Life Savers<br />

Accommodation Progress Chart<br />

Accomm.<br />

Amplitude<br />

(break /<br />

recovery)<br />

2/2/12 5.25/4.75D<br />

5.00/4.75D<br />

2/9/23 6.00/4.75 D<br />

7.75/6.00 D<br />

Facility +/-<br />

2.00<br />

(OD/OS)<br />

7cpm/7cpm<br />

Facility<br />

+/-2.00<br />

(OU)<br />

suppression<br />

both sides<br />

Near Far<br />

Rock Hart<br />

Chart<br />

OD/OS<br />

3:28/not<br />

timed<br />

2/23/12 18cpm/18cpm 2:31/2:35<br />

3/1/12 +/-0.75<br />

flippers:<br />

intermittent<br />

suppression<br />

3/15/12 6.5, 8cpm<br />

5/17/12 18cpm/19cpm 9cpm 2:15/2:12<br />

Coursebook Page 23 of 139<br />

4


5/31/2012<br />

Vergence Progress Chart<br />

Developmental Eye Movements Test<br />

Clown Vecto<br />

2/2 BO: 4/2<br />

BI: 2/0<br />

Spirangle<br />

Vecto<br />

2/9 BO: 10/4<br />

BI: 10/9<br />

3/1 BO: 21/13<br />

BI: 13/8<br />

5/17 BO: 20/17<br />

BI: 14/7<br />

BO: 35/24<br />

BI: 21/14<br />

Quoit Vecto<br />

BO: 2/0<br />

BI: 2/0<br />

BO: 2/0<br />

BI: 2/0<br />

BO: 25/23<br />

BI: 13/8<br />

BO: 29/23<br />

BI: 11/7<br />

Brock<br />

String<br />

6 inches<br />

w/effort<br />

7cm<br />

Stereoscope<br />

BO: 7<br />

BI: 3<br />

Vergence<br />

Facility<br />

8pd: 3cpm<br />

6pd: 6cpm<br />

8pd:<br />

8.5cpm<br />

• February 9 th<br />

▫ Vertical: 77 th percentile<br />

▫ Horizontal: 53 rd percentile<br />

▫ H/V: 7 th percentile<br />

▫ 1-2 errors<br />

• March 15 th<br />

▫ Vertical: 72 nd percentile<br />

▫ Horizontal: 69 th percentile<br />

▫ H/V: 47 th percentile<br />

▫ No errors<br />

Stereo Acuity<br />

• Initial Evaluation: 70”<br />

• After 2 wks of therapy: 30”<br />

Treatment Summary<br />

Initial Evaluation<br />

OD Monocular Facility +/-1.50: 4.5 cpm<br />

OS Monocular Facility +/-1.50: 11 cpm<br />

Post Therapy<br />

Evaluation<br />

+/-2.00: 18 cpm<br />

+/-2.00: 19cpm<br />

Binocular Facility +/-0.75: unable +/-2.00: 9 cpm<br />

• 3 months later: 20”<br />

Near BI range 24/28/15 x/12/5<br />

Near BO range 34/34/18 >40/30<br />

Vergence Facility unable 8BI/BO: 8.5 cpm<br />

NPC 18 inches 6 cm<br />

Stereopsis 70” 20”<br />

DEM H/V ratio 7 th percentile 47 th percentile<br />

Subjective Improvements<br />

Reading again<br />

More visually aware/less blur<br />

Feels more ready to start<br />

school for Electrical<br />

Engineering<br />

Sees 3-D in movies<br />

Treatment Summary<br />

• Evaluations and initial treatment: Dec, Jan. 26<br />

• 5 training sessions: Feb. 2 nd , 9 th , 23 rd , March 1 st<br />

and 15 th<br />

• Progress Visual Efficiency Eval: April 12 th (not<br />

feeling well and very dim illumination needed)<br />

• Progress: MVPT3, DEM, FD: April 19 th<br />

• CL fit: May 3 rd<br />

• CL check and repeat Visual Efficiency Progress<br />

Evaluation: May 17 th<br />

Coursebook Page 24 of 139<br />

5


5/31/2012<br />

Special Considerations for VT patient<br />

with TBI<br />

• Usually takes longer<br />

• Other factors, speech, cognitive impairment, etc.<br />

• Mild TBI often most successful cases<br />

• More variation in performance, good and bad<br />

days<br />

• Be aware of nausea<br />

• Vision Therapy can make a difference<br />

Traumatic Brain Injury<br />

• 1.4 million brain injuries each year 1<br />

• 5.3 million Americans (2% of population) need<br />

help performing activities of daily living 2<br />

• In combat, at least 14-20% of casualties have<br />

TBI that require acute and long term care 3<br />

• Mild TBI cases are not being identified. 40% of<br />

these patients experience vision problems. 3<br />

Biochemical Basis of Neuro-Disruption 4<br />

Breakdown of intimate<br />

association of cerebral<br />

blood flow (CBF) and<br />

cerebral glucose<br />

metabolism (CMGL)<br />

Cell<br />

toxicity<br />

Ischemia and<br />

hypoxia<br />

Metabolic<br />

imbalances<br />

Change<br />

neuronal cell<br />

membrane<br />

permeability<br />

Most Common Visual Diagnoses<br />

Following TBI<br />

• Convergence Insufficiency<br />

• Strabismus<br />

• Accommodative Insufficiency<br />

• Accommodative Infacility<br />

• Ocular Motility Disorders<br />

• Visual Field Defects<br />

• Photosensitivity<br />

• Dry Eye<br />

Case History<br />

• Did you lose consciousness Did you feel heat or pressure during blast<br />

• Did the blast affect your hearing<br />

• Are you more sensitive to light Noise<br />

• Blurry or double vision<br />

• Headaches<br />

• Balance problems<br />

• Feel dizzy Do you feel this way when you move your eyes<br />

• Bump into things<br />

• Miss objects when first reach Have difficulty judging depth of stairs<br />

• Poor concentration, memory, or attention<br />

• Difficulty thinking or solving problems Identifying objects<br />

• Trouble with speech<br />

• Overstimulated Overwhelmed Do things that didn’t bother you, now do<br />

• Change of emotions Short-tempered<br />

• Anxious Depressed Dreams of traumatic past events Fatigue easily<br />

• Are there things you used to be able to do and can’t anymore<br />

• Does the floor look tilted Do walls or floor shift and move<br />

• Cranial nerve questions<br />

BIVSS SYMPTOM CHECKLIST<br />

Please check the most appropriate box, or circle the item number that best matches your observations. Alll<br />

information will be held in confidence. Circle a number below. Please rate each behavior.<br />

How often does each behavior occur (circle a number) Never Seldom Occasionally Frequently Always<br />

EYESIGHT CLARITY<br />

Distance vision blurred and not clear -- even with lenses 0 1 2 3 4<br />

Near vision blurred and not clear -- even with lenses 0 1 2 3 4<br />

Clarity of vision changes or fluctuates during the day 0 1 2 3 4<br />

Poor night vision / can’t see well to drive at night 0 1 2 3 4<br />

VISUAL COMFORT<br />

Eye discomfort / sore eyes / eyestrain 0 1 2 3 4<br />

Headaches or dizziness after using eyes 0 1 2 3 4<br />

Eye fatigue / very tired after using eyes all day 0 1 2 3 4<br />

Feel “pulling” around the eyes 0 1 2 3 4<br />

DOUBLING<br />

Double vision -- especially when tired 0 1 2 3 4<br />

Have to close or cover one eye to see clearly 0 1 2 3 4<br />

Print moves in and out of focus when reading 0 1 2 3 4<br />

Coursebook Page 25 of 139<br />

6


5/31/2012<br />

BIVSS SYMPTOM CHECKLIST<br />

LIGHT SENSITIVITY<br />

Normal indoor lighting is uncomfortable – too much glare 0 1 2 3 4<br />

Outdoor light too bright – have to use sunglasses 0 1 2 3 4<br />

Indoors fluorescent lighting is bothersome or annoying 0 1 2 3 4<br />

DRY EYES<br />

Eyes feel “dry” and sting 0 1 2 3 4<br />

“Stare” into space without blinking 0 1 2 3 4<br />

Have to rub the eyes a lot 0 1 2 3 4<br />

DEPTH PERCEPTION<br />

Clumsiness / misjudge where objects really are 0 1 2 3 4<br />

Lack of confidence walking / missing steps / stumbling 0 1 2 3 4<br />

Poor handwriting (spacing, size, legibility) 0 1 2 3 4<br />

PERIPHERAL VISION<br />

Side vision distorted / objects move or change position 0 1 2 3 4<br />

What looks straight ahead--isn’t always straight ahead 0 1 2 3 4<br />

Avoid crowds / can’t tolerate “visually-busy” places 0 1 2 3 4<br />

READING<br />

Short attention span / easily distracted when reading 0 1 2 3 4<br />

Difficulty / slowness with reading and writing 0 1 2 3 4<br />

Poor reading comprehension / can’t remember what was read 0 1 2 3 4<br />

Confusion of words / skip words during reading 0 1 2 3 4<br />

Lose place / have to use finger not to lose place when reading 0 1 2 3 4<br />

Home Training Kit $325<br />

• 1-patch, 1-Brock String (large), 1-Marsden Ball<br />

• R/G glasses<br />

• 2-Lifesaver cards (Clear and Opaque)<br />

• 10-loose lenses (+.50, +1.00, +1.50, +2.00, +2.50, -.1.00, -2.00,<br />

-3.00, -4.00, -5.00)<br />

• 4-flipper lenses: (+/- 1.00, +/- 1.50, +/- 2.00, +/- 2.50)<br />

• Loose Prisms: 4, 6, 8, 12 pd<br />

• Tranaglyphs:<br />

6-one-piece fixed:<br />

BC 71, BC 72 vertical<br />

BC 51, BC 52, BC 53, BC 54<br />

3-two-piece variable: BC 920H (horizontal mini), BC 520, BC 802<br />

• Tranaglyph holder<br />

• Reading Bars for suppression monitoring<br />

Resources<br />

• DVBIC (Defense and Veterans Brain Injury<br />

Center)www.dvbic.org<br />

• NORA (Neuro-Optometric Rehabilitation<br />

Association)www.nora.cc<br />

• Resources for returning Veterans:<br />

http://www.oefoif.va.gov<br />

• www.Bernell.com<br />

• http://oep.excerpo.com/<br />

References<br />

1. Langlois JA, Rutland-Brown W, Thomas KE.Traumatic brain injury in the United States:<br />

emergency department visits, hospitalizations and deaths. Atlanta GA: Centers for Disease<br />

Control and Prevention, National Center for Injury Prevention and Control, 2004.<br />

2. Thurmann D, Alverson C, Dunn K, Guerro J,Sniezek J. Traumatic brain injury in the United<br />

States: a public health perspective. J Head Trauma Rehab 1999;14:602-15.<br />

3. Traumatic Brain Injury, Veterans Health Initiative: Department of Veterans Affairs,<br />

Employee Education System; January 2004.<br />

4. Center for Neuro Skills. http://www.neuroskills.com/brain-injury/the-neuro-biochemicalbasis-of-post-trauma-vision-syndrome.php<br />

5. Scheiman and Wick. Clinical Management of Binocular Vision: Heterophoric,<br />

Accommodative, and Eye Movement Disorders<br />

6. Griffin and Grisham. Binocular Anomalies: <strong>Diagnosis</strong> and Vision Therapy<br />

7. NORA meeting notes. Atlanta 2011.<br />

8. Medscape: Epidemiology and Classification of Traumatic Brain Injury<br />

Thank you!<br />

Coursebook Page 26 of 139<br />

7


5/29/2012<br />

Overview<br />

CASE STUDY:<br />

THE EVOLUTION AND RESOLUTION OF AN<br />

OCULOMOTOR NERVE PALSY<br />

PRESENTER: JESSICA DENNIS - JNDMAIL@YAHOO.COM<br />

INSTRUCTOR: DOUGLAS DEVRIES - EMAIL<br />

Case presentation<br />

<strong>Differential</strong> diagnoses and assessment<br />

Pathway and function of oculomotor nerve<br />

Plan<br />

Referrals<br />

Follow ups<br />

Additional information<br />

Questions<br />

Eye Care Associates of Nevada - 2285 Green Vista- Sparks, NV 89431<br />

Ring ring<br />

Presentation (11/14/2012)<br />

ER doctor calls Saturday night<br />

CC: dull eye ache/pain OS<br />

• Stable VAs<br />

Reports normal eye examination including<br />

• Full EOMs, no pain/diplopia<br />

• Pupils normal, no APD<br />

• No AC reaction<br />

• Normal CT scan<br />

Initial assessments…<br />

Follow up with Ophthalmologist Monday<br />

Demographics-<br />

54 year old<br />

African American male<br />

Medical history:<br />

• Heart disease<br />

• High blood pressure<br />

• Diabetes, type II<br />

• Insulin dependent<br />

• Peripheral diabetic neuropathy<br />

• Hemodialysis secondary to diabetic nephropathy<br />

ROS:<br />

• Hearing loss, chronic cough, arthritis, easy fatigability, depression, kidney failure<br />

Current medications:<br />

• Alprazolam, amlodipine, aspirin, Coreg, gabapentin, insulin, Prevacid, nitroglycerine,<br />

Coumadin, Zovirax<br />

Ocular history:<br />

• Cataract extraction OU (5/2011)<br />

Presentation (11/14/2012)<br />

Examination (11/14/2012)<br />

CC: “Worried implant moved”<br />

HPI:<br />

Constant dull ache OS<br />

• No jaw claudication or temporal pain<br />

• Trace photophobia<br />

(+) diplopia for 2 days, goes away if OD covered<br />

• Vertical and horizontal, distance and near<br />

• Stable, constant<br />

Slight blur/fuzzy VA OS<br />

Reports blood glucose in the low 100’s<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

VA(sc)<br />

OD: 20/20<br />

OS: 20/25- , PH 20/25+<br />

CVF:<br />

full OD, OS<br />

EOMs:<br />

full OD<br />

Normal primary gaze- no exotropia or hypotropia<br />

Adduction and infraduction gaze restrictions OS, (+) diplopia<br />

Pupils:<br />

Aniso OS>OD in light and dim illuminations<br />

Slow reaction to light OS<br />

Normal near response<br />

No APD<br />

Hertel:<br />

21>-----


5/29/2012<br />

Examination (11/14/2012)<br />

Anterior segment<br />

Ptosis OS<br />

Trace SPK OU<br />

PCIOL OU<br />

1+ PCO OS<br />

Examination (11/14/2012)<br />

Posterior segment<br />

Questionable mild pallor ONH OS<br />

Tortuous vessels OU<br />

(+) trace cellophane changes OU<br />

Scattered dot/blot hemes in all four quadrants OU<br />

• possible IRMA/NVE superotemporal arcades OS<br />

Abnormal findings…<br />

DDx<br />

Abnormal EOMs OS<br />

Pupil OS<br />

Ptosis OS<br />

Diabetic/heart conditions…<br />

DDx<br />

Partial oculomotor nerve palsy<br />

Strabismus<br />

Decompensated phoria<br />

Myasthenia Gravis<br />

Grave’s<br />

Orbital fracture<br />

Internuclear ophthalmoplegia<br />

Duane’s type II<br />

Brown’s<br />

Strabismus and Decompensated Phorias<br />

Perform cover test in different fields of gaze<br />

Results comitant or non-comitant<br />

Non-comitant considered greater then 5 prism diopters<br />

of difference between<br />

Non-comitant generally implies cranial nerve palsies<br />

Comitant usually indicates strabismus<br />

Paretic or mechanical<br />

Ductions (monocular eye movement)<br />

Versions (binocular eye movement, physiologic H)<br />

Ductions>Versions<br />

Paretic<br />

Ductions=Versions<br />

Mechanical<br />

Forced duction testing<br />

Drop the suspected eye with anesthetic<br />

Grab conjunctiva with toothless forceps near limbus and attempt to move eye in<br />

direction opposite that mechanical restriction is thought<br />

+ forced duction means eye did NOT move<br />

Indicates mechanical restriction<br />

- forced duction means eye DID move<br />

Indicates paretic in nature<br />

Coursebook Page 28 of 139<br />

2


5/29/2012<br />

History is key…<br />

Myasthenia Gravis<br />

Grave’s<br />

Orbital fracture<br />

Review<br />

Internuclear ophthalmoplegia<br />

Lesion of MLF<br />

Ipsilateral adduction deficit with abducting nystagmus is<br />

opposite eye<br />

Duane’s type II<br />

Adduction deficit<br />

No globe retraction<br />

Brown’s<br />

Superior oblique tendon sheath syndrome<br />

Limited elevation in adduction<br />

Assessment<br />

1. Left partial CN III palsy, relative pupil sparing<br />

2. IDDM with moderate to severe NPDR OD<br />

IDDM with likely NPDR OS<br />

Oculomotor nerve review<br />

Origination and pathway<br />

Efferent pupillary pathway<br />

OM nerve functions<br />

Partial, complete, isolated<br />

3. Pseudophakic OU<br />

4. PCO OS<br />

Origin<br />

Oculomotor nuclear complex<br />

http://www.neuroanatomy.wisc.edu/virtualbrain/BrainStem/21CNIII.html<br />

Coursebook Page 29 of 139<br />

3


5/29/2012<br />

Origin<br />

Pathway<br />

http://radiologymri.blogspot.com/2010/12/oculomotor-infarct.html<br />

http://www.medrounds.org/ocular-pathology-study-guide/uploaded_images/cwmr-768439.jpg<br />

Pathway<br />

Pathway<br />

http://bestpractice.bmj.com/best-practice/monograph/956/basics/pathophysiology.html<br />

http://legacy.owensboro.kctcs.edu/gcaplan/anat/notes/api%20notes%20m%20%20peripheral%20nerves.htm<br />

Functions<br />

Edinger-Westphal (Efferent pupillary pathway review)<br />

Superior division:<br />

levator palpebrae superioris*<br />

superior rectus<br />

Inferior division:<br />

medial rectus*<br />

inferior rectus*<br />

inferior oblique<br />

- preganglionic parasympathetic to ciliary ganglion<br />

(innervation of sphincter pupillae* and ciliary muscle)<br />

http://brains.oxfordmedicine.com/cgi/content-nw/full/12/1/med-9780198569381-chapter-002/FIG002037<br />

Coursebook Page 30 of 139<br />

4


5/29/2012<br />

Types<br />

Recall assessment<br />

<br />

Pupil involving<br />

Aneurysm, tumor, trauma, cavernous sinus mass, pituitary<br />

apoplexy, herpes zoster<br />

1. Isolated left partial CN III palsy<br />

-relative pupil sparing<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

Relative pupil sparing<br />

Ischemic microvascular disease*<br />

Pupil sparing<br />

Ischemic microvascular disease, GCA<br />

Isolated<br />

Partial or complete<br />

2. IDDM with moderate to severe NPDR OD<br />

IDDM with likely NPDR OS<br />

3. Pseudophakic OU<br />

4. PCO OS>OD<br />

Plan<br />

1. Order MRI of brain/orbits****<br />

- Request CT scan<br />

- Neuro-ophthalmic consult<br />

2. Retina specialist consult for likely PDR<br />

3. Yag laser OS<br />

Treatment options for diplopia:<br />

Patching (remember not to patch patients


5/29/2012<br />

11/30/2012 continued<br />

MRI w/o contrast<br />

<br />

Examination continued…<br />

Anisocoria OS>OD<br />

OS down and to the left<br />

EOMs OS<br />

• Supraduction, infraduction, adduction restricted<br />

• normal abduction<br />

Negative forced ductions**<br />

Complete ptosis OS<br />

Maxillofacial CT scan (11/12/11) – normal<br />

MRI (11/15/2011)<br />

Brain<br />

Findings<br />

No mass effects or shift of midline structures<br />

No hemorrhagic lesions<br />

No evidence of acute cerebral infarction<br />

Impression<br />

Minimal age related cortical atrophy<br />

Microvascular ishemic gliosis<br />

Wedge shaped area of chronic infarction, left occipital lobe<br />

11/30/2012 continued<br />

12/22/2011<br />

Assessment:<br />

Pupillary involving left oculomotor palsy…<br />

Diabetic (ischemic microvascular) third nerve palsies spare pupil…<br />

Order MR angiogram of head and neck to r/o posterior communicating artery aneurysm<br />

Left occipital infarct<br />

HVF<br />

Diabetic retinopathy OU<br />

Ordered the following lab studies:<br />

• CBC<br />

• ESR/CRP<br />

• ACE level<br />

• ANA<br />

• PRP<br />

Trial dispense of celebrex for pain<br />

RTC 1 month<br />

Patient reports slight increase on inward eye movement and<br />

complete relief of pain with celebrex<br />

Examination:<br />

Slightly improved motilities on supraduction and adduction<br />

HVF 30-2:<br />

Scattered defects<br />

Lab results:<br />

CBC: normal<br />

Metabolic panel: elevated glucose level<br />

ANA, ACE, ESR, RPR, vit B12, folate: normal<br />

MR angiogram (12/9/2011):<br />

Circle of Wilis: normal<br />

Neck: normal carotid arteries<br />

12/22/2012 continued<br />

Assessment:<br />

<br />

1. Marginally improved pupillary involving left<br />

oculomotor palsy<br />

**Importantly “no clear-cut evidence of posterior<br />

communicating artery aneursym”<br />

2. Left occipital lobe infarction<br />

- No HVF defects<br />

3. Bilateral diabetic retinopathy<br />

RTC 1 month<br />

03/01/2012<br />

Missed appointments… things must be better<br />

Yes! No double vision, pain and ptosis improved<br />

EOMs, pupils<br />

Examination showed full recovery of adduction,<br />

supraduction and infraduction!<br />

Pupils showed slight aniso (4.5 OD, 5.0 OS)<br />

Coursebook Page 32 of 139<br />

6


5/29/2012<br />

Summary of Retinal Appointments<br />

Retinal Consultation<br />

Dr. Jarl Nielsen<br />

Nevada Retina Associates<br />

610 Sierra Rose Drive<br />

Reno, NV 89511<br />

11/15/2011 (OD 20/20, OS 20/25)<br />

NPDR OD, Early PDR OS<br />

12/20/2011 (OD 20/20, OS 20/40)<br />

IVFA performed<br />

PDR OS>OD<br />

PRP OS performed<br />

01/10/2012 (OD 20/20, OS 20/40)<br />

PRP OS<br />

1/31/2012 (OD 20/20, OS 20/30)<br />

PRP OS<br />

RTC for DFE OD, possible PRP<br />

Summary of Retinal Appointments<br />

Summary of Retinal Appointments<br />

02/07/2012 (OD 20/20, OS 20/30)<br />

DFE OD minimally active NVE<br />

Stable OS<br />

Follow up in 2-4 weeks, PRP OD<br />

02/28/2012<br />

PRP OD<br />

03/20/2012<br />

PRP OD<br />

05/08/2012<br />

Involuting NVE OD<br />

No active NVE OS<br />

RTC 1 month<br />

04/10/2012<br />

PRP OD<br />

03/05/2012<br />

Back to Eye Care Associates…<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

Referred back by Dr. Hershewe for possible conjunctivitis<br />

SLE:<br />

2+ injected nasal and temporal pinguecula<br />

Trace to 1+ diffuse SPK<br />

PCO OS>OD<br />

Assessment:<br />

Pingueculitis OD>OS<br />

Dry eye syndrome<br />

Plan:<br />

Continue FML qid (as dispensed by Dr. Hershewe)<br />

add artificial tear use<br />

RTC for YAG OS 1 st , then OD<br />

Coursebook Page 33 of 139<br />

7


5/29/2012<br />

03/14/2012<br />

Lastly, addressing “slight blur OS”<br />

VA post laser treatment<br />

• OD: 20/20<br />

• OS: 20/20-<br />

Additional information<br />

Possible CN III locations of involvement<br />

Aberrant regeneration<br />

Food for thought<br />

And full motilities!<br />

RTC annually<br />

Follow up with Dr. Nielsen as scheduled<br />

Location of palsy<br />

Midbrain damage<br />

All or part of nucleus may be affected<br />

• More commonly entire nucleus<br />

If entire nucleus<br />

• Ipsilateral muscles involved: MR, IR IO<br />

• Contralateral muscles involved: SR<br />

• Both: levators<br />

CN IV nucleus close by…<br />

• Is contralateral superior oblique involved<br />

Location of palsy<br />

Intracranial<br />

As previously discussed, posterior communicating artery<br />

common location for aneurysm to affect oculomotor<br />

nerve<br />

Less common are posterior cerebral and superior<br />

cerebellar arteries<br />

Location of palsy<br />

Cavernous sinus<br />

Ipsilateral CN IV involvement possible<br />

Ophthalmic division of V<br />

Maxillary division of V<br />

Eye would be out (only LR working) and facial anesthesia<br />

would be present<br />

Orbital<br />

Retrobulbar tumor or inflammation<br />

• CN VI and nasociliary nerves involved secondary to close location<br />

in muscle cone<br />

Eye would be down, slightly out (only SO working)<br />

http://www.oculist.net/downaton502/prof/ebook/duanes/pages/v1/v1c003.html<br />

Coursebook Page 34 of 139<br />

8


5/29/2012<br />

CN III aberrant regeneration<br />

Fibers making incorrect connections<br />

Can occur from the following<br />

Congenital<br />

Primary<br />

Acquired… damage or compression<br />

• During recovery<br />

• NOT ISCHEMIC!!!<br />

CN III aberrant regeneration<br />

1. Pseudo graefe sign<br />

levator superioris and inferior rectus<br />

2. Eyelid dyskinesis<br />

levator superioris and medial rectus<br />

3. Pupil dyskinesis<br />

parasympathetic fibers and medial rectus<br />

Food for thought<br />

86% of pupil involved are from aneurysms<br />

23% of pupil involved are vascular/ischemic<br />

14% of pupil sparing are from aneurysms<br />

77% of pupil sparing are vascular/ischemic<br />

Food for thought<br />

95% of painful CN III palsies are caused by<br />

aneurysms<br />

80% of painful CN III palsies are ischemic/vascular<br />

Pain not a very good differential<br />

Kissel JT. Ann Neurol 1983<br />

Goldstein JE, et al. Arch Ophthalmol 1960<br />

Clinical Pearls<br />

Questions<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

Case history<br />

Investigate the double vision<br />

• Monocular or binocular<br />

• Vertical or horizontal<br />

• Distance or at near<br />

Comitant or non-comitant<br />

Forced duction testing!<br />

Photo document<br />

Don’t forget imaging guidelines<br />

Can be an ocular emergency!!<br />

Send for proper referrals<br />

Atypical cases… not all are textbook<br />

Special thanks to:<br />

Curtis Manning, MD<br />

Paul W Hiss, MD<br />

Douglas Devries, OD<br />

Gerard L Hershewe, DO<br />

Jarl Nielsen, MD<br />

Coursebook Page 35 of 139<br />

9


5/29/2012<br />

Oliver<br />

Oliver<br />

Kuhn-Wilken,<br />

Kuhn-Wilken,<br />

O.D.<br />

O.D.<br />

Jeffery Hiett, O.D. and Irene Yang, O.D.<br />

Drs. Jeffery Hiett and Irene Yang<br />

Jonee Brandt, O.D. and Jason Bleazard, O.D.<br />

Drs. Jonee Brandt American and Lake Jason VA Bleazard Hospital<br />

American Lakewood, VA Washington Hospital<br />

Lakewood, Washington<br />

The Problem with<br />

Prostaglandins<br />

Case #1: BW<br />

• 71 yo white male<br />

• CC: vision OD is “like spots on a shower door” x 6 months,<br />

gradual onset, now constant, am = pm, distance = near.<br />

• POHx: POAG treated with TravatanZ qhs OU<br />

cataract extraction with PCIOL (2006) and YAG OU<br />

• PMHx: COPD<br />

sleep apnea with CPAP cannulas<br />

• VAs sc: OD 20/50-2 PHNI, OS 20/20-1<br />

• Tap OD 11 mmHg, OS 13 mmHg @ 0900<br />

• SLE: ONH: c/d ratio OD 0.65 with pallor, OS 0.30<br />

macula: OD elevation at fovea, OS normal<br />

Case #1: BW<br />

• Stratus OCT:<br />

foveal thickness<br />

OD 541 um,<br />

OS 214 um<br />

Case #1: BW<br />

• Assessment: cystoid macular edema OD<br />

• Plan: discontinue TravatanZ<br />

Rx dorzolamide 2% bid OU<br />

Rx ketorolac 0.4% qid OD<br />

Case #1: BW<br />

Exam Date Foveal thickness OD BCVA OD IOP OD<br />

8/19/2011 541um 20/50-2 11<br />

8/30/2011 475um 20/40-2 15<br />

9/13/2011 298um 20/40 17<br />

9/27/2011 252um 20/30+1 18<br />

10/27/2011 275um 20/40 19<br />

CME fundus appearance<br />

OCT<br />

OD:10/27/2<br />

011<br />

CME fundus<br />

appearance<br />

Coursebook Page 36 of 139<br />

1


5/29/2012<br />

CME<br />

Cystic spaces<br />

on OCT:<br />

CME can follow<br />

ant. seg. inflammation<br />

• Anterior uveitis<br />

• Cataract surgery (Irvine-Gass Syndrome) or YAG<br />

Late-phase petalloid appearance on FA:<br />

CME can follow<br />

post. seg. inflammation<br />

• Retinal venous occlusions<br />

• Epiretinal membrane<br />

• Diabetic retinopathy<br />

• ARMD<br />

Edema<br />

of<br />

Müller<br />

cells<br />

Edema<br />

of the<br />

Edema optic<br />

of nerve the<br />

optic<br />

nerve<br />

The Prostaglandin Analogs<br />

• First line glaucoma therapy<br />

• Possible pro-inflammatory effect<br />

• Relative contraindications: cataract surgery<br />

uveitis<br />

herpes simplex keratitis<br />

epiretinal membrane<br />

pregnancy<br />

Coursebook Page 37 of 139<br />

2


5/29/2012<br />

The Inflammatory Cascade<br />

The Hidden Cost of CME<br />

• 1-2% of CE patients diagnosed with “clinical CME.”<br />

• 20% of patients have “angiographic CME.”<br />

0.8<br />

LogMAR vision versus time following cataract extraction<br />

ETDRS vision in LogMAR units<br />

0.7<br />

0.6<br />

0.5<br />

0.4<br />

0.3<br />

0.2<br />

0.1<br />

No CME<br />

CME at 8 weeks<br />

0<br />

Pre-op Day 1 Day 14 Day 30 Day 60<br />

Ursell PG, Spalton DJ, Whitcup SM, et al.<br />

CME and cataract surgery<br />

• The biggest risk factors:<br />

uncontrolled diabetes or hypertension<br />

CME following CE in the fellow eye<br />

CE with breach of the posterior capsule<br />

retinal venous disease<br />

epiretinal membrane<br />

PGs and cataract surgery<br />

• There is no Gold Standard.<br />

• Recommendation: cover with an NSAID<br />

qid for 2-7 days prior to surgery.<br />

• Do not discontinue or replace a<br />

prostaglandin.<br />

Management of CME<br />

• NSAID qid<br />

• Pred Forte qid<br />

• Consider replacing a prostaglandin<br />

• Referral if not improving: consider sub-<br />

Tenon’s injection, intravitreal injection, or<br />

vitrectomy<br />

PGs<br />

and<br />

uveitis<br />

• Uveitis is an inflammatory disease<br />

• PGs may have a pro-inflammatory effect<br />

• Therefore PGs are relatively<br />

contraindicated in uveitic patients.<br />

• Contraindication is rarely observed<br />

Coursebook Page 38 of 139<br />

3


5/29/2012<br />

PGs and uveitis<br />

Study No. of eyes Time Uveitic response<br />

Warwar 1998 163 normals 1 year 6.4%<br />

Smith 1999 505 normals 1 year 1.0%<br />

Smith 1999 13 uveitics 1 year 23.1% Mostly mild cases<br />

Chang 2008 163 uveitics 3 mos.<br />

Markomichelakis<br />

2008 58 uveitics 6 mos.<br />

equal to<br />

control<br />

equal to<br />

control<br />

Control = fellow eye, non PG<br />

glaucoma medication<br />

Control =<br />

dorzolamide/timolol<br />

medication<br />

PGs and uveitis<br />

• Case studies describe patients in whom<br />

uveitis occurs in the ipsilaterally treated<br />

eye, and patients in whom the uveitis<br />

improves after cessation and recurs after<br />

rechallenge.<br />

• Latanoprost may not lower IOP during a<br />

uveitic flare.<br />

Goldberg 2008 5,856 normals 5 years OD<br />

laser burns OS peripheral retina, no tear<br />

Case #2: HF<br />

• Assessment: herpes simplex keratitis OS.<br />

• Plan: Rx Viroptic q2h OS, acyclovir<br />

400mg bid po, and erythromycin ung qhs<br />

OS.<br />

Case #2: HF<br />

Date VA OS Assessment Current medications<br />

10/25/07 20/200 Acute HSK OS TravatanZ qhs OU, timolol 0.5%<br />

GFSqam OU (continued)<br />

10/29/07 20/200 “Improving” Viroptic q2hr OS, erythromycin ung<br />

qhs OS (continued)<br />

11/02/07 20/200 “Improving” Viroptic 5x/day OS with taper,<br />

acyclovir 400 mg po bid<br />

11/09/07 4/300 “No improvement” Viroptic 5x/day OS, acyclovir 400mg<br />

po bid (continued)<br />

11/13/07 5/200-1 “Improving” Taper Viroptic over 4 days<br />

11/16/07 5/200-1 “Slowly improving” Viroptic qd x 2 days then d/c<br />

11/19/07 5/200- “Resolving” Refresh tears qid OS<br />

11/26/07 5/250 “Resolving” no change<br />

11/30/07 5/200 “no improvement” Replace erythro with bacitracin ung<br />

12/3/07 5/200- “Resolving” no change<br />

12/7/07 5/225 “Resolved” Replace baci with erythro ung qhs OU<br />

Case #2: HF<br />

Date VA OS Assessment Plan<br />

12/14/07 4/160 “Resolving” TravatanZ qhs OU, timolol 0.5% GFSqam<br />

OU, acyclovir 400 mg po bid (continued)<br />

12/31/07 4/160 “Resolving” no change<br />

2/5/08 5/700 Active disciform<br />

HSK<br />

Viroptic 5x/day OS,<br />

acyclovir 400 mg po bid (continued)<br />

2/8/08 2/125 “Resolving” Viroptic 5x.day OS<br />

2/11/08 2/125 “Resolving” Viroptid qid OS<br />

2/15/08 3/400 “Resolving” Viroptic qd OS x 1 day then d/c<br />

2/20/08 3/350 “Improving” D/c Viroptic. D/c TravatanZ OS<br />

2/25/08 3/350 “Improving” no change<br />

3/4/08 5/350 “improvement” D/c TravatanZ OD<br />

3/7/08 5/350 “continued<br />

no change<br />

improvement”<br />

3/14/08 5/300 “stable” no change<br />

Coursebook Page 39 of 139<br />

4


5/29/2012<br />

PGs and herpes simplex keratitis<br />

PGs and herpes simplex keratitis<br />

Study Patients Time HSK rate Caveat<br />

Bean 2004 39,174 normals<br />

on PG therapy<br />

6 years 0.11% Only counted 1 st occurrence<br />

Only counted if within 7<br />

days of PG start<br />

Lead researcher employed<br />

by Pfizer<br />

Research paid for by Pfizer<br />

• Case studies: HSK reported to recur after<br />

up to 10 years of inactivity upon<br />

commencement of latanoprost use, and be<br />

unresponsive to anti-viral therapy until<br />

the latanoprost is discontinued.<br />

• No other large studies<br />

References<br />

Prostaglandin take-homes<br />

1. Cover with an NSAID prior to CE if there<br />

are any risk factors.<br />

2. Uveitis or HSK due to PGs is very rare.<br />

3. Strongly consider discontinuing PGs<br />

once CME, uveitis, or HSK occurs.<br />

• Giuffre G. The effects of prostaglandin F2 in the human eye. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol<br />

1985;222:139-41.<br />

• Benitah, Nicole R. MD; Arroyo, Jorge G. MD. Pseudophakic Cystoid Macular Edema. International<br />

Ophthalmology Clinics: Winter 2010 - Volume 50 - Issue 1 - pp 139-153. doi:<br />

10.1097/IIO.0b013e3181c551da. extraction: a fluorescein funduscopic and angiographic study. Arch<br />

Ophthalmol. 1966;76:646.<br />

• Yanoff M, Fine BS, Brucker AJ, et al. Pathology of Human Cystoid Macular Edema. Surv Opthalmol 28<br />

(Suppl): 505-511, 1984.<br />

• Miyake K, Ibaraki N. Prostaglandins and Cystoid Macular Edema. Surv Opthalmol 47 (Supplement 1):<br />

S203-S218, 2002.<br />

• Warren K. Current Concepts in the Etiology and Treatment of Pseudophakic Cystoid Macular Edema.<br />

Retinal Physician: http://www.retinalphysician.com/printarticle.aspxarticle=103062, 6/1/2009.<br />

Accessed 03/06/2012.<br />

• Ursell PG, Spalton DJ, Whitcup SM, et al. Cystoid macular edema after phacoemulsification: relationship<br />

to blood-aqueous barrier damage and visual acuity. J Cataract Refract Surg. 1999; 25:1492-1497.<br />

• Ngyuen, Q. The role of prostaglandin analogs in the treatment of glaucoma in the 21 st century. Int.<br />

Ophthalmol Clin 2004;44:2:15-27.<br />

• Arcieri ES, Santana A, Rocha FN, et al. Blood-aqueous barrier changes after the use of prostaglandin<br />

analogues in patients with pseudophakia and aphakia. Arch Ophthalmol. 2005;123:186-192.<br />

• Miyake K, Ota I, Maekubo K, et al. Latanoprost accelerates disruption of the blood-aquous barrier and<br />

the incidence of angiographic cystoid macular edema in early postoperative pseudophakias. Arch<br />

Ophthalmol. 199;117:34-40.<br />

References<br />

• Shrivastava A. Prostaglandins, cataract surgery and CME. Review of Ophthalmology. 07/22/2009.<br />

• Camras CB, Bhuyan KC, Podos SM, et al. Multiple dosing of prostaglandin F2 or epinephrine on<br />

cynomolgus monkey eyes. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1987;28:921-6.<br />

• Arcieri ES, Pierre Filho PT, Wakamatsu TH. The effects of prostaglandin analogues on the blood aqueous<br />

barrier and corneal thickness of phakic patients with primary open-angle glaucoma and ocular<br />

hypertension. Eye (Lond). 2008 Feb; 22(2):179-183.<br />

• Warner RE, Bullock JD, Ballal D. Cystoid macular edema and anterior uveitis associated with latanoprost<br />

use: experience and incidence in a retrospective review of 94 patients. Opthalmology. 1998;105:263-268.<br />

• Chang JK, McCluskey P, Missotten T, et al. Use of ocular hypotensive prostaglandin analogues in<br />

patients with uveitis: does their use increase anterior uveitis and cystoid macular edema Br J<br />

Ophthalmol. 2008 Jul;92(7):916-21.<br />

• Goldberg I, Li XY, Selaru P, et al. A 5-year, randomized, open-label safety study of latanoprost and usual<br />

care in patients with open-angle glaucoma or ocular hypertension. Eur J Ophthalmol. 2008;18(3):408-416.<br />

• Wand M, Gilbert CM Liesegang Tj. Latanoprost and herpes simplex keratitis. Am J Ophthalmol<br />

1999:127(5):602-604.<br />

• Bean G, Reardon G, Zimmerman TJ. Association between ocular herpes simplex virus and topical ocular<br />

hypotensive therapy. J Glaucoma. 2004;13(5):361-364.<br />

Coursebook Page 40 of 139<br />

5


*<br />

<strong>Diagnosis</strong> and Management of<br />

Posner-Schlossman Syndrome<br />

Jonee Brandt O.D.<br />

VA Puget Sound Health Care System: American Lake<br />

Division<br />

jonee.brandt@gmail.com<br />

What is Posner-Schlossman<br />

Syndrome<br />

• First described in 1948 by Abraham Schlossman and Adolf Posner<br />

who had a series of 9 patients with similar symptoms and<br />

characteristics of both glaucoma and uveitis.<br />

• Uncommon inflammatory eye condition, classically unilateral, with<br />

elevated intraocular pressures and minimal inflammation.<br />

• Recurrent<br />

• Tends to occur in young-middle aged adults, male>female, with no<br />

racial predilection.<br />

• Accounts for about 4% of all anterior uveititis.<br />

Typical Presentation<br />

*Acute intermittent history of mild blurred vision and minimal unilateral<br />

discomfort<br />

*Mild conjunctival injection, minimal anterior chamber reaction, small to<br />

medium keratitic precipitates, NO posterior synechiae, possible iris<br />

heterochromia/sectoral atrophy, and markedly elevated IOP.<br />

*Acute attacks will resolve spontaneously in a matter of days-weeks<br />

*Recurrence of attacks can vary greatly from patient to patient<br />

<strong>Differential</strong> Diagnoses<br />

• Herpes Simplex Trabeculitis<br />

- Viral infection of endothelial cells of TM, cellular swelling and lysis 2’ to<br />

immune attacks<br />

- Management: IOP control, antivirals, and concurrent topical steroid tx<br />

- May also present with: corneal endotheliitis and 2’ edema<br />

- (+)HSV, possible h/o keratitis<br />

●<br />

<strong>Differential</strong> Diagnoses<br />

Fuch's Heterochromic Iridocyclitis<br />

● Iris heterochromia<br />

● Chronic mild unilateral anterior uveitis which does<br />

NOT respond to steroid treatment<br />

● Triad of heterochromia, cataract, and glaucoma<br />

<strong>Differential</strong> Diagnoses<br />

• Pigmentary Glaucoma<br />

-Krukenberg’s spindle, iris TID’s,<br />

pigment in TM<br />

-glaucomatous changes to optic nerve<br />

head<br />

• Angle Closure/Angle<br />

Closure Glaucoma<br />

-closed angle on gonioscopy<br />

-likely more severe symptoms:<br />

including nausea/vomiting, facial<br />

pain, haloes around lights<br />

Coursebook Page 41 of 139<br />

1


*<br />

<strong>Differential</strong> Diagnoses<br />

• Ankylosing Spondylitis<br />

– Lower back pain<br />

– X-Ray of sacral spinal region and<br />

HLA-B27<br />

• Reiter’s Syndrome<br />

– Triad of arthritis, conjunctivitis,<br />

urethritis<br />

– HLA-B27<br />

• Behcet’s Disease<br />

– Mouth, skin, and/or genital ulcers<br />

– Mediterranean descent<br />

– HLA-B5<br />

<strong>Differential</strong> Diagnoses<br />

• Juvenile Rheumatoid<br />

Arthritis<br />

– Children<br />

– Girls>Boys<br />

– ANA<br />

• (Granulomatous)-<br />

Syphillis/Sarcoidosis<br />

– RPR/VDRL if suspect syphilis (quick<br />

nonspecific), reflect disease activity vs<br />

FTA-ABS and MHA-TP remain<br />

positive for life, even after active<br />

disease<br />

Indicated Testing<br />

• Complete eye examination, including gonioscopy to rule out angle<br />

closure glaucoma/pigmentary glaucoma<br />

• As Posner Schlossman patients present with markedly elevated IOP<br />

during these recurrent attacks monitor closely for developing<br />

glaucomatous changes: RNFL OCT, Threshold Visual Fields<br />

• Appropriate lab testing to rule out systemic causes of inflammation:<br />

– CRP/ANA/HLA-B27<br />

– HLA-B5<br />

– PPD/Chest X-Ray to rule out TB<br />

– CBC with differential: to determine if bacterial or viral<br />

– RPR/VDRL, FTA-Abs, MHA-TP<br />

Possible Etiologies<br />

• Posner and Schlossman first theorized an infectious<br />

etiology due to episodic nature.<br />

• Viral favored due to intermittence of attacks<br />

• Trabeculitis<br />

• Elevated prostaglandin E<br />

Possible Etiologies<br />

Possible Etiologies<br />

• Cytomegalovirus<br />

– Various small scale studies have found that aqueous aspirates of PSS patients<br />

(+)CMV<br />

– Chee et al had first large scale study with 24/105 anterior uveitis pts (+)CMV, but<br />

18 out of those 24 were found to have PSS. 11/18 (+)CMV reverse transciptase on<br />

PCR, during inactive periods pts were (-)CMV<br />

– HOWEVER, seropositivity testing reveals CMV is common in the general<br />

population (87% seropositivity in Singapore, 60-80% in US)<br />

●<br />

Helicobacter Pylori<br />

– Choi et al examined 40 PSS vs 73 normals<br />

– 80% of PSS pts were (+)H. Pylori by ELISA, vs 56.2% normals<br />

– Postulated theory of direct infection to the eye or that H. Pylori increases host<br />

susceptibility for ocular inflammation, possibly through damage to blood vessels<br />

• Herpes Simplex Virus<br />

– 3 patients with active PSS had PCR on aqueous draws<br />

(+)HSV, (-)CMV, (-)VZV<br />

– Subsequent studies have failed to replicate these results<br />

– Treatment of PSS with Acyclovir has been shown to be<br />

ineffective<br />

Varicella Zoster Virus<br />

– 1985 Varicella skin testing revealed that 5/7 pts had PSS<br />

attacks when immune response to varicella was low on skin<br />

testing, and the other 2 with a high immune response<br />

showed no PSS attacks in a 2 year follow up<br />

– Small sample size<br />

Coursebook Page 42 of 139<br />

2


*<br />

Is Posner Schlossman Syndrome<br />

Benign<br />

• CASE PP: 37 yo AM<br />

1 st exam in 09/2007: Pt at that time reports recurrent uveitic<br />

attacks OD x 5-6x/year and reports he felt he was having an attack at<br />

that time: discomfort and slight blurred vision OD.<br />

VA 20/20- OD, OS<br />

IOP 22 OD, 14 OS mmHg<br />

C/D ratio 0.5 H/V OD, 0.4 H/V OS<br />

Assessment: Recurrent non-granulomatous anterior uveitis OD<br />

Plan: Scopolamine bid, Cosopt bid, Pred Forte q2hr OD, RTC 3<br />

weeks for follow up<br />

Date<br />

Acute<br />

Attack<br />

vs<br />

Follow<br />

Up<br />

Visual Acuity<br />

OD, OS<br />

9/29/2007 AA 20/20‐ OD,<br />

OS<br />

IOP<br />

OD, OS<br />

Present<br />

ocular meds<br />

Plan<br />

22, 14 None PF q2hr,<br />

scop bid,<br />

cosopt bid<br />

OD. RTC 3<br />

days<br />

10/1/07 FU 20/25 OD, OS 12, 12 PF q2hr, scop<br />

bid, cosopt<br />

bid OD<br />

10/5/2007 FU 20/25 OD<br />

20/20 OS<br />

10, 14 PF qid, Scop<br />

bid, Cosopt<br />

bid OD<br />

PF qid,<br />

continue<br />

Scop/coso<br />

pt bid OD<br />

RTC 4<br />

days<br />

Taper PF,<br />

d/c<br />

Cosopt<br />

and scop<br />

OD<br />

RTC 3<br />

weeks<br />

Additional<br />

Recurrent<br />

NG<br />

Anterior<br />

Uveitis<br />

“”<br />

“”<br />

Date AA vs FU Visual<br />

Acuity<br />

OD, OS<br />

1/30/12 AA 20/15,<br />

20/20<br />

2/10/12 FU 20/15,<br />

20/20<br />

3/5/12 FU with<br />

AA:<br />

symptoms<br />

presented<br />

yesterday<br />

20/15,<br />

20/20<br />

3/19/12 FU 20/20 OD,<br />

OS<br />

IOP<br />

OD, OS<br />

Present ocular meds<br />

27, 11 Self initiated PF 1day<br />

ago OD<br />

Plan<br />

PF qid and Brimonidine<br />

bid OD, RTC 10 days<br />

8, 11 PF qid, Brim bid OD Taper PF, continue<br />

Brim bid OD<br />

RTC 3 weeks for<br />

DFE/OCT<br />

32, 12 None Begin PF qid x 2 weeks,<br />

Brim bid OD. RTC 2<br />

weeks.<br />

7, 14 PF qid and Brim qd<br />

OD<br />

Taper PF slowly,<br />

continue brimonidine<br />

bid OD. Begin trial IBU<br />

200mg po tid. F/U in 1<br />

mo.<br />

03/05/12<br />

RNFL thickness OCT<br />

Impression:<br />

Good symmetry in a triple<br />

hump pattern OD, OS.<br />

No glaucomatous RNFL<br />

thinning OD, OS.<br />

Is Posner Schlossman Syndrome<br />

Benign<br />

• Case 2: NH 67 yo AAM<br />

– 2007: OS red with 8/10 pain, photophobia, and cloudy vision. Pt<br />

reports several occurrences over past few years. Last occurrence<br />

3-4 mos ago and reports it usually resolves in 1 week.<br />

• VA 20/20 OD, 20/30- OS<br />

• Pupils: (+)APD OS<br />

• SLE: +KP’s and 1+ cells OS<br />

• IOP 16 OD/48 OS mmHg<br />

• C/D 0.4 OD, 0.6 OS<br />

• Assessment: Trabeculitis OS<br />

• Plan: Alphagan tid OS, Levobunolol bid OS, Dorzolamide bid OS, IOP check<br />

1 day<br />

Date VA IOP Current ocular meds Plan<br />

4/27/07 20/20, 20/25‐ 16, 36 Brim tid, levo bid, dorz bid, PF<br />

qid<br />

5/2/07 20/20, 20/25 16, 15 Brim tid, levo bid, dorz bid, PF<br />

taper<br />

CPM, RTC 5<br />

days<br />

Taper PF, RTC 2<br />

weeks for<br />

CEE/IOP check<br />

6/5/07 20/20, 20/25 18, 18 Self D/C all meds Start Cosopt tx<br />

bid OS, RTC 6<br />

mos for<br />

HVF/OCT/IOP<br />

12/6/07 20/20, 20/25 18, 22 Cosopt bid OS<br />

RTC 6 weeks<br />

for IOP check.<br />

***FDT at this date showed<br />

nasal step and early inferior<br />

arcuate defect OS. C/D 0.4<br />

OD, 0.6 OS<br />

LOST TO FOLLOW UP<br />

4/10/09 20/20, 20/30‐ 19,54 D/C cosopt bid OS<br />

C/D : 0.45 OD, 0.95 OS<br />

***OCT today<br />

Cosopt bid,<br />

Brim bid, PF qid<br />

OS<br />

Coursebook Page 43 of 139<br />

3


*<br />

Date<br />

Visual Acuity<br />

OD, OS<br />

IOP<br />

OD, OS<br />

Current Ocular<br />

Meds<br />

03/2011 20/20, 20/25 17, 18 Cosopt and<br />

Brimonidine<br />

bid OU, PF bid<br />

OS<br />

04/11 20/20, 20/25 20, 25 Cosopt only bid<br />

OU<br />

06/11 20/20, 20/40 16, 15 Cosopt bid,<br />

Brim bid OU<br />

Plan<br />

CPM, D/C PF.<br />

RTC 1 mo with<br />

glaucoma<br />

specialists<br />

Reinitiate<br />

brimonidine<br />

bid OU. RTC 1<br />

mo<br />

RTC 3 mos with<br />

GLC specialists<br />

08/11 20/20, 20/40 16, 15 “ RTC 3 mos for<br />

HVF/IOP<br />

11/22/11** 20/20, 20/40 18, 35 “ Add PF qid OS,<br />

RTC 2 days<br />

11/24/11** 20/20, 20/40 12, 28 “+PF qid OS RTC 1 week<br />

Date DVA IOP Current ocular meds Plan Additional<br />

01/11/12 20/20,<br />

20/50<br />

02/08/12 20/20,<br />

20/50<br />

03/08/12 20/20,<br />

20/50<br />

04/10/12 20/20,<br />

20/50<br />

4/17/12 20/20,<br />

20/50<br />

05/3/12 20/20,<br />

20/50<br />

14, 20 Cosopt, Brim bid OU Add PF qid x 10 days<br />

OS. Begin<br />

Latanoprost qhs OS.<br />

RTC 10 days<br />

12, 13 Cosopt, Brim bid OU, RTC 4 mos HVF<br />

Latanoprost qhs and PF<br />

tid OS<br />

13, 34 “” without PF OS Add PF qid OS. RTC 1<br />

week<br />

8, 26 Cosopt bid, Brim bid<br />

OU, Latanoprost qhs OS<br />

Add Rimexolone qid<br />

OS, RTC 1 week<br />

11, 15 “” +Rimexolone qid OS RTC for previously<br />

scheduled F/U with<br />

GLC specialists 2‐3<br />

weeks<br />

12, 16 “” RTC 2‐3 mos for HVF.<br />

Still no improvement<br />

of Bell’s Palsy R side.<br />

Dx Pituitary<br />

Microadenoma<br />

Recent onset<br />

Bell’s Palsy R<br />

side<br />

Hold HVF until<br />

Bell’s Palsy<br />

improved R<br />

side.<br />

Failed to<br />

follow up in<br />

GLC clinic.<br />

04/10/2009<br />

Impression:<br />

OD: no glaucomatous<br />

RNFL thinning<br />

OS: severe RNFL<br />

thinning S/I/T and<br />

borderline nasal. Avg<br />

thickness 93 OD, 43<br />

OS<br />

03/24/2011 HVF 24-2<br />

OD: GHT ONL, MD -9.06dB, PSD 10.96dB. Great Reliability<br />

OS: GHT ONL, MD -32.05dB, PSD 1.81dB. Great Reliability<br />

Impression:<br />

OD: Avg thickness 81 (from 93), with mild flattening of curves overall. New borderline<br />

nasal thinning since last<br />

OS: Avg thickness 35 (from 43), overall flattening, severe thinning.<br />

Is Posner Schlossman Syndrome<br />

Benign<br />

• Retrospective review of all patients with PSS seen at Uveitis Clinic of<br />

Singapore National Eye Center: 53 eyes of 50 patients<br />

– Mean age at onset: 35<br />

– 22 Female/28 Male<br />

– Mean duration of disease: 7 years<br />

– No patients had steroids or antiglaucoma tx between attacks<br />

– 14/53 eyes developed glaucomatous damage 2’ to repeated attacks (26.4%)<br />

– 11/14 eyes had normal discs/fields initially, but over a mean of 10 years had<br />

disc/field damage<br />

– Only predictive factor in development of glaucoma is duration of disease<br />

– Risk of glaucoma developing after 10 years of exposure is 2.8x higher than in


*<br />

• 9/14 glaucomatous eyes underwent glaucoma filtering surgery: 1<br />

trabeculectomy with MMC and 8 trabeculectomy with 5-FU<br />

• Mean post op F/U 37 mos, with a mean IOP at last visit of 10mmHg<br />

• 1/9 required glaucoma medications, all of the rest did not<br />

• In the year prior to surgery these 9 eyes had 3-4 iritis attacks each. After<br />

surgery, 6 of these eyes had no further attacks. In the 3 eyes with<br />

further attacks, 2 did not have an increase in IOP, and 1 had 15 attacks<br />

with elevated IOP causing failure of the bleb and progression of<br />

glaucomatous damage.<br />

• PROBLEMS OF STUDY: followed at 6 mo intervals, with instructions<br />

to return earlier if experiencing an attack (reliable pts)<br />

Management<br />

• Treatment doesn’t shorten length of attack<br />

• During an attack inflammation responds well to<br />

topical steroids: prednisolone acetate 1% qid<br />

• IOP control: ocular hypotensive agents<br />

• Careful monitoring of glaucomatous changes with<br />

RNFL OCT and HVF<br />

Possible Treatments<br />

Surgical Options<br />

• Topical Ganciclovir for possible CMV etiology<br />

– Chee et al 10 pts with (+)CMV PSS began oral gancyclovir, oral<br />

valgancyclovir, or intravitreal gancyclovir. All had decrease in attack<br />

frequency and duration of inflammation.<br />

– A follow up study found that systemic gancyclovir for 12 weeks had<br />

cessation of episodes and normalized IOP during treatment in 91%,<br />

topical 64%. But topical had lower recurrence rate (only 57%, vs 80%<br />

systemic)<br />

– Shortcoming of study: PSS recurrence can be separated by months-years.<br />

Treatment success could have been normal time period between<br />

exacerbations<br />

• Not enough evidence to prove efficacy at this time<br />

• Oral or topical NSAID Not enough research<br />

Trabeculectomy Valve/Shunt Implantation<br />

• No study found directly related to valve success in PSS patients<br />

• Stavrou and Murray: 32 eyes with 20 types of uveitis found that 71.9% of eyes had<br />

a reduction in severity of inflammation and the number of relapses after<br />

trabeculectomy<br />

– None of the operations failed as a result of inflammation<br />

– Pattern of uveitis may be related to success rate<br />

– Improved aqueous outflow may allow inflammatory mediators out of the<br />

anterior chamber<br />

●<br />

●<br />

●<br />

●<br />

●<br />

●<br />

In conclusion...<br />

Posner Schlossman Syndrome is a recurrent unilateral mild anterior<br />

uveitis with marked elevation in intraocular pressures.<br />

Management of an acute attack includes ocular hypotensive agents and<br />

topical steroids<br />

Studies have found that 26.4% of PSS patients will develop<br />

glaucomatous changes in the affected eye.<br />

Most important factor in glaucoma risk analysis is duration of the disease<br />

and likely frequency of attacks.<br />

Importance of careful follow up including optic nerve head OCT/VF<br />

Not enough evidence at this point to determine if filtering surgery for<br />

IOP control or topical antivirals to prevent recurrence are viable<br />

treatment options<br />

References<br />

1. Chee, S. Jap, A. Presumed Fuch’s Heterochromic Iridocyclitis and Posner-Schlossman<br />

Syndrome. Comparison of Cytomegalovirus-Positive and Negative Eyes. American<br />

Journal of Ophthalmology. 2008. 883-889<br />

2. DaMata, A. et al.Management of Uveitic Glaucoma with Ahmed Glaucoma Valve<br />

Implantation. Ophthalmology. 106. 1999. 2168-2172.<br />

3. Green, R. Posner Schlossman Syndrome. Clinical and Experimental Optometry. 2007.<br />

53-56<br />

4. Jap, A. et al. Is Posner-Schlossman Syndrome Benign Ophthalmology. 2001. 913-<br />

918.<br />

5. Siveroj, C. et al. <strong>Diagnosis</strong> and Management of Herpetic Anterior Uveitis. 43-47.<br />

6. Takusagawa, H. et al. Infectious Theories of Posner-Schlossman Syndrome.<br />

International Ophthalmology Clinics. 2011. 105-115.<br />

7. Towler, H. et al. Long-term follow up of Trabeculectomy with Intraoperative 5-FU for<br />

Uveitis related Glaucoma. Ophthalmology. 2000. 1822-1828.<br />

8. Stavrou, P. Murray, P. Does trabeculecomy influence the course of uveitis Ocular<br />

Immunology and Inflammation. 1999. 103-108.<br />

Coursebook Page 45 of 139<br />

5


5/29/2012<br />

Learning Objectives<br />

Case Studies in Contact Lens Correction<br />

for Myopic Refractive Error & Myopia Control<br />

Kelvin So, OD<br />

<strong>Pacific</strong> <strong>University</strong> College of Optometry<br />

Review theories of myopia progression and treatment<br />

options<br />

Understand application of gas permeable (GP) and soft<br />

contact lenses (SCL) for myopia correction and control<br />

Review cases of Orthokeratology and Multifocal Soft<br />

Contact Lens correction for myopia<br />

Clinical Pearls for Orthokeratology and Multifocal Soft<br />

Contact Lens fits<br />

Discuss current research in GP and SCL for myopia<br />

control<br />

Myopia Etiology<br />

9.2% of US children<br />

18.5% in Asian Americans<br />

6.6% in African Americans<br />

80% in Taiwan<br />

Theories of Myopia Progression<br />

Near Work<br />

Near-work induced accommodation causes prolate changes<br />

shape of the globe and axial elongation<br />

Support treatment of using progressive addition lenses<br />

Support treatment of inhibiting accommodation or effecting<br />

ocular physiology with the use of cycloplegic agents including<br />

Atropine and Pirenzepine<br />

Ostrow G, Kirkeby L. Update on myopia and myopic progression in children. International Ophthalmology Clinics 2010; 50: 87-93<br />

Waler TW, Mutti DO. The effect of accommodation on ocular shape. Optometry and Vision Science. 2002; 70:424-430.<br />

Smith EL III, Kee C-S. Ramamirtham R, Qiao-Grider Y, Hung L-F. Peripheral vision can influence eye growth and refractive development in<br />

infant monkeys. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2005; 46: 3965-3972.<br />

Theories of Myopia Progression<br />

Peripheral Image Shell Theory<br />

Foveal image has no effect on emmetropization<br />

Animal studies using chicks and infant monkeys have shown<br />

peripheral hyperopic retinal stimulus to cause axial elongation<br />

Support treatment of shifting peripheral image shell in front of<br />

the retina with the use of concentric multifocal optics<br />

Waler TW, Mutti DO. The effect of accommodation on ocular shape. Optometry and Vision Science. 2002; 70:424-430.<br />

Smith EL III, Kee C-S. Ramamirtham R, Qiao-Grider Y, Hung L-F. Peripheral vision can influence eye growth and refractive development in<br />

infant monkeys. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2005; 46: 3965-3972.<br />

Efficacy of Treatment Options<br />

Progressive Addition Lenses<br />

Limited effects in 5 years (COMET Study)<br />

Most significant effects in children with poor accommodation<br />

and esophoric at near (COMET II Study)<br />

Atropine<br />

Toxicity, photophobia, myopia rebound to normal after<br />

treatment cessation<br />

Pirenzepine<br />

Limited follow-up data<br />

Concentric Multifocal Optics<br />

Significant slowing in axial elongation<br />

Gwiazda J, Hyman L, Hussein M, et al. A randomized clinical trial of progressive addition lenses verses single vision lenses on the progression<br />

of myopia in children. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2003; 44: 1492-1500.<br />

Walline JJ, Jones LA, Sinnott LT. Corneal reshaping and myopic progression. Br J Ophthalmol. 2009;93:1181–1185<br />

Tong L, Huang XL, Koh AL, et al. Atropine for the treatment of childhood myopia: effect on myopia progression after cessation of atropine.<br />

Ophthalmology. 2009;116:572–579<br />

Coursebook Page 46 of 139<br />

1


5/29/2012<br />

Concentric Multifocal Optics<br />

Orthokeratology (Ortho-K)<br />

Over-night wear of reverse-geometry GP lens<br />

Hydrodynamic forces compress central corneal epithelial cells,<br />

and create mid-peripheral epithelial cells hyperplasia<br />

Central corneal flattening corrects for myopia by placing image<br />

at fovea while maintaining myopic peripheral image shell<br />

Concentric Multifocal Optics<br />

Orthokeratology (Ortho-K)<br />

Hydrodynamic forces compress central corneal epithelial cells,<br />

and create mid-peripheral epithelial cells hypertrophy<br />

Choo J, Caroline P, et al. Changes in Cat Epithelium Following Overnight Lens Wear with the Paragon CRT Lens for Corneal Reshaping.<br />

Poster presented at <strong>Pacific</strong> Univeristy. Forest Grove, Oregon.<br />

Concentric Multifocal Optics<br />

Orthokeratology (Ortho-K)<br />

Orthokeratology<br />

Effective for mild to moderate myopia correction<br />

Conventional correction up to -6.00D, maximum correction<br />

beyond -10.00D<br />

Pros<br />

No lens wear during waking hours<br />

Durable lens with years of effective use<br />

Parents responsible for handling lenses<br />

Higher safety profile<br />

Cons<br />

Adaptation period<br />

Potential for corneal abrasion<br />

Reduced treatment zone size with higher myopia correction<br />

Forister JFY et al, Prevalence of contact lens-related complications: UCLA contact lens study. Eye Contact Lens 2009 July;35(4):176-180.<br />

Wagner H, et al (CLAY Group), Risk factors for interruption to soft contact lens wear in children and young adults, Optom Vis Sci, Aug<br />

2011;88(8):973-980.<br />

Concentric Multifocal Optics<br />

Multifocal SCL<br />

Daily wear of SCL with center-distance multifocal optics<br />

Focused foveal image with myopic peripheral image shell<br />

Multifocal Soft Contact Lenses<br />

Effective for mild to high myopia correction<br />

Correction from -0.25D to -20.00D with off-the-shelf lenses<br />

Custom multifocal soft lenses available<br />

Pros<br />

Minimal adaptation period<br />

Cons<br />

Patient also needs to learn application and removal<br />

Potential for infection<br />

Potential for variable optics due to lens centration, movement,<br />

and material<br />

Coursebook Page 47 of 139<br />

2


5/29/2012<br />

Orthokeratology<br />

Fitting Process<br />

Corneal topography<br />

Simulated Keratometry readings<br />

Evaulation of corneal astigmatism<br />

Manifest refraction<br />

Most recent spectacle Rx<br />

Best corrected visual acuity<br />

Orthokeratology<br />

Fitting Process<br />

Consult fitting chart for appropriate lens<br />

Order based on sliding rule<br />

Orthokeratology<br />

Fitting Process<br />

Upload topography and manifest refraction data to lens fit<br />

simulator<br />

Adjust lens parameters to optimize fit prior to ordering lenses<br />

Orthokeratology<br />

Fit evaluation<br />

“Bullseye” NaFl pattern<br />

Approximately 0.5mm movement<br />

Vision corrected to best spectacle corrected visual acuity<br />

Dispense lens if all three criteria are met and patient/parent<br />

can successfully apply and remove lens<br />

Orthokeratology<br />

Follow-up<br />

One night follow-up the next morning to evaluate lens fit and<br />

myopia correction<br />

Tangential difference display on topographer to evaulate<br />

centration<br />

“Smiley face” crescent suggest high riding lens<br />

“Frowny face” crecsent suggest low riding lens, often better visual<br />

outcome<br />

Axial difference display on topographer to evaluate correction<br />

Correction over visual axis is key<br />

Followed by one week, one month, then three months followup<br />

schedule.<br />

Evaluate vision and corneal integrity at each appointment<br />

Orthokeratology<br />

Case Study: RF<br />

9 YOAM<br />

Both parents myopic<br />

Approximately 0.50D myopia progression every 6 months<br />

Spectacle correction for myopia<br />

Attempted Ortho-K lens dispense 1/2011, patient unable to<br />

keep lids open for safe lens application and removal<br />

Parents and patient practiced artificial tears instillation at home<br />

RTC 8/2011 to attempt Ortho-K again<br />

MRx:<br />

OD: -6.00-0.50x180 20/20<br />

OS: -6.25-0.75x180 20/20<br />

Coursebook Page 48 of 139<br />

3


5/29/2012<br />

Orthokeratology<br />

Case Study: RF<br />

Topography<br />

Orthokeratology<br />

Case Study: RF<br />

CRT Dual Axis Lens Simulator<br />

Orthokeratology<br />

Case Study: RF<br />

CRT Dual Axis Lens Simulator<br />

Orthokeratology<br />

Case Study: RF<br />

CRT Dual Axis Lens Simulator<br />

Orthokeratology<br />

Case Study: RF<br />

CRT Dual Axis Lens Simulator<br />

Orthokeratology<br />

Case Study: RF<br />

Initial lens ordered and dispensed 9/2011:<br />

OD: Paragon CRT Dual Axis 8.9/550/600/35/11.0<br />

OS: Paragon CRT Dual Axis 8.8/550/600/34/11.0<br />

Slightly high riding lens<br />

Lens rest on lower lid due to tight lid architecture<br />

Expect improved centration with lid closure<br />

Dispensed for over-night wear<br />

Coursebook Page 49 of 139<br />

4


5/29/2012<br />

Orthokeratology<br />

Case Study: RF<br />

One-night follow-up the next morning<br />

Slightly high correction zone (smiley face)<br />

Uncorrected VA 20/50- OU<br />

Good corneal integrity<br />

Orthokeratology<br />

Case Study: RF<br />

One-night follow-up difference display<br />

Continue lens wear for one week<br />

Orthokeratology<br />

Case Study: RF<br />

One-week follow-up<br />

Slightly high correction zone<br />

Uncorrected VA 20/50- OU<br />

Good corneal integrity<br />

Topography shows residual myopia OU<br />

Adjust lens parameters to increase corneal flattening using simulator<br />

Orthokeratology<br />

Case Study: RF<br />

New Parameters ordered and dispensed 10/2011<br />

OD: Paragon CRT Dual Axis 9.1/575/34/600/36/11.0<br />

OS: Paragon CRT Dual Axis 9.0/575/34/600/36/11.0<br />

Flattened Base Curve to increase central corneal flattening<br />

Adjusted individual axis to improve lens centration<br />

Flatten base curve to enhance central corneal flattening<br />

Steepen Landing Zone Angle at one meridian to match steeper<br />

vertical corneal meridian<br />

Orthokeratology<br />

Case Study: RF<br />

Follow-up with flatter base curve dual-axis lenses<br />

Central corneal staining with mild irritation and conj injection OD<br />

Uncorrected VA 20/25 OU<br />

Wider, slightly higher treatment area<br />

Axial difference display reveal residual myopia OS<br />

Orthokeratology<br />

Case Study: RF<br />

Discontinue lens wear<br />

Moxeza ophthalmic solution 1gtt bid x 5 days OD<br />

Nevanac ophthalmic suspension 1 gtt tid x 5 days OD<br />

Consider Multifocal SCL at follow-up<br />

Coursebook Page 50 of 139<br />

5


5/29/2012<br />

Orthokeratology<br />

Case Study: RF<br />

Completely healed corneal abrasion with no scarring on f/u<br />

Parent motivated to continue Ortho-K due to convenience of<br />

no lens wear during waking hours, was educated on corneal<br />

complications due to high myopia, agreed to try SCL.<br />

Multi-focal Soft Lenses<br />

Ordered and dispensed 11/2011<br />

OD: Proclear Multifocal 8.7/-5.50/14.4/+2.50Add/D Lens 20/20<br />

OS: Proclear Multifocal 8.7/-6.00/14.4/+2.50Add/D Lens 20/20<br />

Tangential difference display shows centered treatment zone<br />

Axial difference display shows full myopia correction over<br />

visual axis, with +1.50 D add at pupil margin.<br />

Multi-focal Soft Lenses<br />

Increase Add to reduce peripheral myopia correction:<br />

OD: Proclear Multifocal 8.7/-5.50/14.4/+3.00Add/D Lens 20/20<br />

OS: Proclear Multifocal 8.7/-6.00/14.4/+3.00Add/D Lens 20/20<br />

Multi-focal Soft Lenses<br />

Increase Add to reduce peripheral myopia correction:<br />

OD: Proclear Multifocal 8.7/-5.50/14.4/+3.00Add/D Lens 20/20<br />

OS: Proclear Multifocal 8.7/-6.00/14.4/+3.00Add/D Lens 20/20<br />

Clinical Pearls<br />

Orthokeratology<br />

Practice Makes Perfect<br />

Have patient and parents practice artificial tears instillation to improve lid<br />

manipulation and facilitate corneal de-sensitization prior to fitting.<br />

Sleep It Off<br />

Adaptation takes place rapidly in children, especially in over-night wear.<br />

Take It Step by Step<br />

When correcting high myopia, strive for lens centration first with partial<br />

correction and SCL wear during the day, and progressively increase<br />

corneal flattening to achieve full correction.<br />

Be a Boy Scout (Be Prepared!)<br />

Corneal abrasions do happen, and are easily treated with antibiotic cover,<br />

as well as NSAID to improve comfort and control healing process. Have<br />

these medications ready in-office.<br />

Clinical Pearls<br />

Multi-focal Soft Lenses<br />

Topography over SCLs<br />

Difference map comparing baseline topography and topography over<br />

SCL will show effective power over visual axis, and peripheral add<br />

Angle Lambda<br />

Centered lens on cornea does NOT mean centered optics over visual<br />

axis, perform corneal topography prior to fitting to predict success<br />

Foveal Image Clarity is KEY<br />

If lenses are decentered, it is possible that the foveal image is overplused,<br />

consider adding minus to distance power to achieve optimal<br />

distance vision<br />

High Add<br />

Start with minimum of +2.50 Add, increase to +3.00 Add if needed<br />

Maldonado-Codina et al. Comparative clinical performance of rigid versus soft hyper Dk contact lenses used for continuous wear. Optom Vis<br />

Sci, 2005;82(6):536-548.<br />

Coursebook Page 51 of 139<br />

6


5/29/2012<br />

Research Findings<br />

How Much Add<br />

Peripheral image shell have increasing effectiveness with<br />

increase in add<br />

Ortho-K patients perform best if baseline refractive error is<br />

high<br />

Multi-focal soft lenses allow increase in peripheral add even in<br />

low myopes<br />

Case Study<br />

JS & GS<br />

Twins with low myopia<br />

OD fitted with +2.50D add, OS fitted with +3.00D add<br />

At 1 year follow-up, OD showed myopia progression in both twins<br />

while OS stabilized<br />

Lampa M, So K, et al. Assessing Soft Multifocal Contact Lens Centration with the Aid of Corneal Topography. Poster presented at Global<br />

Specialty Lens Symposium. Las Vegas, NV. 2012.<br />

Research Findings<br />

Aspheric ortho-k lens design<br />

Aspheric back surface to induce more mid-peripheral<br />

steepening compared to conventional design<br />

Attempts to induce higher mid-peripheral myopia to increase<br />

myopia control effectiveness<br />

Traditional OK Design<br />

Base Curve: 8.23 mm 41.00 D.<br />

Research Findings<br />

Aspheric ortho-k lens design<br />

Aspheric back surface to induce more mid-peripheral<br />

steepening compared to conventional design<br />

Attempts to induce higher mid-peripheral myopia to increase<br />

myopia control effectiveness<br />

Traditional OK Design<br />

Base Curve: 8.23 mm 41.00 D.<br />

Aspheric OK Design<br />

Base Curve: 8.23 mm 41.00 D.<br />

Aspheric OK Design<br />

Base Curve: 8.23 mm 41.00 D.<br />

Adjunct Therapies<br />

Time outdoors<br />

Sydney Myopia Study in2008 showed sig reduction in myopia<br />

prevalent in children with more time spent outdoors. Light<br />

intensity may play a larger role when outdoor due to<br />

decreased image blur and increased depth of field.<br />

Low-dose atropine<br />

Compared to 1.0% atropine, 0.1% atropine has been reported<br />

to have similar effects on controlling axial elongation but<br />

without the side effects.<br />

Rose KR, Morgan IG, Ip J, et al. Outdoor activity reduces the prevalence of myopia in children. Ophthalmology. 2008;115:1279–1285.<br />

Cooper J. Using Atropine as A Primary or As An Adjunctive Treatment to Control Myopia. Lecture Presented at Vision by Design 2012<br />

converence . Scottsdale, AZ. 2012.<br />

Closing Remarks<br />

Both ortho-keratology and multifocal soft lenses are non-pharmaceutical<br />

options for myopia control.<br />

Corneal topography is essential in ortho-keratology, and can greatly<br />

enhance multi-focal soft lens fitting.<br />

Ortho-keratology provides convenient vision correction for children<br />

without need for daytime lens wear.<br />

Multi-focal soft lenses can provide additional peripheral add for low<br />

myopes, while research is underway for ortho-k lenses to provide similar<br />

optics.<br />

Myopia controlling optics should be standard of care for myopic patients.<br />

Coursebook Page 52 of 139<br />

7


5/29/2012<br />

References<br />

Cooper J. Using Atropine as A Primary or As An Adjunctive Treatment to Control Myopia. Lecture Presented at Vision by<br />

Design 2012 converence . Scottsdale, AZ. 2012.<br />

Forister JFY et al, Prevalence of contact lens-related complications: UCLA contact lens study. Eye Contact Lens 2009<br />

July;35(4):176-180.<br />

Gwiazda J, Hyman L, Hussein M, et al. A randomized clinical trial of progressive addition lenses verses single vision lenses on<br />

the progression of myopia in children. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2003; 44: 1492-1500.<br />

Hom MM, Bruce AS, Consider lid geometry when fitting RGP lenses, Ocular Surgery News, US Edition, June 1, 2000<br />

Lampa M, So K, et al. Assessing Soft Multifocal Contact Lens Centration with the Aid of Corneal Topography. Global Contact<br />

Lens Symposium, Las Vegas, NV. 2012.<br />

Maldonado-Codina et al. Comparative clinical performance of rigid versus soft hyper Dk contact lenses used for continuous<br />

wear. Optom Vis Sci, 2005;82(6):536-548.<br />

Rose KR, Morgan IG, Ip J, et al. Outdoor activity reduces the prevalence of myopia in children. Ophthalmology.<br />

2008;115:1279–1285.<br />

Siatkowski RM, Cotter SA, Crockett RS, et al. Two-year multicenter, double-masked, placebo-controlled, parallel safety and<br />

efficacy study of 2% pirenzepine ophthalmic gel in children with myopia. Ophthalmology. 2008;12:332–339.<br />

Stapleton F, Keay L, Edwards K et al. The Incidence of Contact Lens-Related Microbial Keratitis in Australia. Ophthalmology.<br />

2008. 115 (10): 1655-62.<br />

Tong L, Huang XL, Koh AL, et al. Atropine for the treatment of childhood myopia: effect on myopia progression after cessation<br />

of atropine. Ophthalmology. 2009;116:572–579.<br />

Tan DTH, Lam DS, Chua WH, et al. One-year multicenter, double-masked, placebocontrolled, parallel safety and efficacy study<br />

of 2% pirenzepine ophthalmic gel in children with myopia. Ophthalmology. 2005;112:84–91.<br />

Wagner H, et al (CLAY Group), Risk factors for interruption to soft contact lens wear in children and young adults, Optom<br />

Vis Sci, Aug 2011;88(8):973-980.<br />

Walline JJ, Jones LA, Sinnott LT. Corneal reshaping and myopic progression. Br J Ophthalmol. 2009;93:1181–1185.<br />

Coursebook Page 53 of 139<br />

8


5/29/2012<br />

OVERVIEW<br />

ENDOTHELIAL CHANGES<br />

ASSOCIATED WITH INTRAOCULAR<br />

LENS SURGERY<br />

Benefits and risks.<br />

Corneal responses.<br />

Specular microscopy as a clinical tool.<br />

Research study: endothelial cell<br />

densities/structure after IOL surgeries.<br />

Future directions.<br />

Alison She, OD<br />

IRIS Ophthalmology Clinic, Langley, BC<br />

Primary Care/Ocular and refractive surgery<br />

INTRAOCULAR LENS IMPLANTS<br />

Benefits:<br />

• Vision.<br />

• Efficiency.<br />

• Clear lens exchange.<br />

Risks:<br />

• Post-op side effects.<br />

• Worst case scenarios.<br />

SIGNIFICANCE OF THE ENDOTHELIUM<br />

Barrier that regulates fluid uptake into cornea.<br />

Transport nutrients into corneal tissue.<br />

Endothelium disruption of cell membrane pumps<br />

affects fluid balance, causing …<br />

• corneal edema,<br />

• haze,<br />

• scarring.<br />

From: Baker Eye Institute<br />

ENDOTHELIAL HEALING<br />

Cornea endothelium does not regenerate well after<br />

damage.<br />

Endothelium self-repairs by existing cells migrating<br />

to fill gaps.<br />

• Perimeter cells around injury site enlarge and move to<br />

fill in damaged areas.<br />

• Cell densities generally decrease with age.<br />

• Natural rate of cell density decrease: 0.5%/year<br />

If the cell density drops too low:<br />

• affects fluid barrier stability.<br />

Coursebook Page 54 of 139<br />

1


5/29/2012<br />

WHAT CAUSES ENDOTHELIAL DAMAGE<br />

DURING SURGERY<br />

Energy from phacoemulsification<br />

Air bubble pressure behind cornea<br />

Turbulence from fluid and lens<br />

fragments during surgery<br />

SURGICAL VARIABLES<br />

VISCOELASTIC SOLUTIONS<br />

More<br />

advanced<br />

cataract<br />

Greater<br />

phaco<br />

energy<br />

Longer<br />

surgical<br />

time<br />

Definition: Protective solution injected into anterior<br />

chamber during cataract surgery.<br />

Purpose:<br />

• Protects endothelium from instruments and<br />

phacoemulsification pressure.<br />

• Maintains anterior chamber depth.<br />

• Opens capsular space to insert IOL.<br />

• Keeps incisions closed when instruments removed from<br />

anterior chamber<br />

Greater<br />

endothelial<br />

loss<br />

Viscoelastic can affect surgical outcome.<br />

PROPERTIES OF DUOVISC ®<br />

PROVISC ® VISCOAT ® KONAN non-contact<br />

SPECULAR MICROSCOPY<br />

specular microscope.<br />

Cohesive<br />

High M.W.<br />

Sodium hyaluronate<br />

Dispersive<br />

Medium M.W.<br />

Sodium hyaluronate +<br />

sodium chondroitin<br />

Parameters measured:<br />

• Cell density<br />

• Cell morphology<br />

Historical significance.<br />

Coursebook Page 55 of 139<br />

2


5/29/2012<br />

SPECULAR MICROSCOPY APPLICATIONS<br />

ENDOTHELIAL CELL COUNT NORMS<br />

Age Average Cell Count (cells/mm 2 )<br />

Diagnose endothelial<br />

dystrophies<br />

Child 3000-4000<br />

20s 2700-3600<br />

30s 2550-3400<br />

Diagnose contact lens<br />

related disorders<br />

40s 2400-3200<br />

50s 2250-3000<br />

60s 2100-2800<br />

70s 1950-2600<br />

Monitor ocular surgery<br />

outcomes<br />

80s 1800-2400<br />

Reference: KONAN microscopy manual FRM-012 Rev. A.<br />

ENDOTHELIUM PROPERTIES<br />

ENDOTHELIUM COMPARISONS<br />

Hexagonality<br />

• Cell shape.<br />

• % cells that are six-sided.<br />

• Normal corneas > 50-60%.<br />

Polymegathism<br />

• Cell size variation.<br />

• Unit of measure: Coefficient of variation (CV).<br />

• Normal range: 0.21-0.33.<br />

1.0 = extremely disrupted cornea.<br />

0 = each cell is precisely identical.<br />

46 year old female 82 year old male<br />

RESEARCH STUDY: CHANGES IN<br />

ENDOTHELIAL CELLS AFTER IOL SURGERY<br />

RESEARCH STUDY<br />

Purpose: evaluate changes in endothelial<br />

cell properties pre & post IOL surgery.<br />

Parameters:<br />

• Cell density.<br />

• Cell hexagonality (shape).<br />

• Cell size variation.<br />

All surgeries at IRIS Ophthalmology<br />

Clinic by same surgeon,<br />

All surgeries used Duovisc ® viscoelastic<br />

solution.<br />

All patients fitted with foldable IOLs.<br />

Coursebook Page 56 of 139<br />

3


5/29/2012<br />

PATIENT SELECTION<br />

Patient age range: 46 to 82 years.<br />

No restrictions on race or gender.<br />

Non-candidates:<br />

• diabetic retinopathy,<br />

• uncontrolled diabetes mellitus,<br />

• diagnosed endothelial dysfunction.<br />

Patient consent for educational photos and data<br />

collection.<br />

METHODS<br />

n=28 eyes of 17 patients.<br />

• 19 eyes with cataract extraction.<br />

• 9 eyes with clear lens exchange.<br />

Specular microscopy taken post-op:<br />

• 1 day.<br />

• 1 week.<br />

• 1 month.<br />

• 3 months.<br />

Cataracts removed via “stop-and-chop”<br />

phacoemulsification.<br />

RESULTS: CELL DENSITIES<br />

3500<br />

CELL DENSITY: PRE-OP TO 3 MONTHS POST-OP<br />

20<br />

15<br />

CELL DENSITY: % CHANGE FROM PRE-OP<br />

CELLS/MM²<br />

3000<br />

2500<br />

2000<br />

1500<br />

1000<br />

PERCENTAGE<br />

10<br />

5<br />

0<br />

-5<br />

-10<br />

-15<br />

-20<br />

-25<br />

500<br />

0<br />

Pre‐op 1d post 1 wk 1 mth 3 mths<br />

TIME AFTER SURGERY<br />

-30<br />

1 day post‐op 1 wk 1mth 3 mths<br />

TIME AFTER SURGERY<br />

HEXAGONALITY OF CELLS<br />

70<br />

PERCENTAGE OF HEXAGONAL CELLS<br />

CELL VARIANCE<br />

0.6<br />

CELL SIZE VARIATION (POLYMEGATHISM)<br />

PERCENTAGE<br />

60<br />

50<br />

40<br />

30<br />

20<br />

10<br />

COEFFICIENT OF VARIATION<br />

0.5<br />

0.4<br />

0.3<br />

0.2<br />

0.1<br />

0<br />

Pre‐op 1 day post‐op 1 wk 1 mth 3 mths<br />

TIME AFTER SURGERY<br />

0<br />

Pre‐op 1 day post‐op 1 wk 1 mth 3 mths<br />

TIME AFTER SURGERY<br />

Coursebook Page 57 of 139<br />

4


5/29/2012<br />

RESEARCH STUDY SUMMARY<br />

Cell density has a larger decrease at 1 day post-op<br />

then gradually recovers over the next 90 days.<br />

High variability at 1 week post op reflects dynamic<br />

nature of endothelium reorganization.<br />

Hexagonality: No statistically significant change pre<br />

vs post surgery long-term.<br />

Polymegathism: No statistically significant change<br />

pre vs post surgery long-term.<br />

FUTURE DIRECTIONS:<br />

PHAKIC IOL SURGERY<br />

Anterior chamber IOL<br />

• AcrySof ® Cachet ® (Alcon)<br />

• Surgical correction for high<br />

refractive errors > 6 D.<br />

Guidelines:<br />

• Specular microscopy at<br />

Pre-op.<br />

6 months post-op.<br />

1 year post-op.<br />

FUTURE RESEARCH DIRECTIONS<br />

Monitor at 1-2 + years post-surgery.<br />

Evaluate systemic factors in endothelial healing:<br />

• Diabetes.<br />

• Inflammatory conditions (arthritis, lupus, etc).<br />

Compare cell loss in:<br />

• Clear lens exchange vs. cataract extraction.<br />

• Long-term monitoring after phakic IOL surgery.<br />

SUMMARY<br />

REFERENCES<br />

Mencucci, R., Ponchietti, C., Virgili, G., Giansanti, F., Menchini, U. “Corneal endothelial damage after cataract surgery:<br />

Microincision versus standard technique.” J Cataract Refract Surg. 2006; 32:1351-1354.<br />

Hengerer, F.H., Dick, H.B., Buchwald, S., Hütz, W.W., Conrad-Hengerer, I. “Evaluation of corneal endothelial cell loss<br />

and corneal thickness after cataract removal with light-adjustable intraocular lens implantation: 12-month follow-up.” J<br />

Cataract Refract Surg. 2011; 37:2095-2100.<br />

Albert, D.M., Jakobiec, F.A. Principles and Practice of Ophthalmology. 1994. W.B. Saunders Company: Philadelphia.<br />

Van den Bruel, A., Gailly, J., Devrieses, S., Welton, N.J., Shortt, A.J., Vrijens, F. The protective effect of ophthalmic<br />

viscoelastic devices on endothelial cell loss during cataract surgery: a meta-analysis using mixed treatment<br />

comparisons. Br J Ophthal. 2011; 95:5-10.<br />

Remington, L. Clinical Anatomy of the Visual System, 2 nd Edition. 2005. Elsevier: Missouri.<br />

Kiss, B., Findl, O., Menapace, R., Petternel, V., Wirtitsch, M., Lorang, T., Gengler, M., Drexler, W. “Corneal endothelial<br />

cell protection with a dispersive viscoelastic material and an irrigating solution during phacoemulsification. Low cost<br />

versus expensive combination.” J Cataract Refract Surg. 2003; 29: 733-740.<br />

Pereira, ACA., Porfirio, F., Freitas, LL., Belfort, R. “Ultrasound energy and endothelial cell loss with stop-and-chop and<br />

nuclear preslice phacoemulsification.” J Cataract Refract Surg. 2006; 32:1661-1666.<br />

Gogate, P., Ambardekar, P., Kulkarni, S., Deshpande, R., Joshi, S., Deshpande, M. “Comparison of endothelial cell<br />

loss after cataract surgery: Phacoemulsification versus manual small-incision cataract surgery. Six week results of a<br />

randomized control trial.” J Cataract Refract Surg. 2010; 36:247-253.<br />

Daly, L., Bourke, J. Interpretation and Uses of Medical Statistics, Fifth Edition. 2000. Blackwell Sciences: UK.<br />

Rainer, G., Stifter, E., Luksch, A., Menapace, R. “Comparison of the effect of Viscoat ® and DuoVisc ® on Postoperative<br />

intraocular pressure after small-incision cataract surgery.” J Cataract Refract Surg. 2008; 34:253-257<br />

Baryanovits, P. “Stabilisation of refraction following cataract surgery.” Br J Ophthal. 1988; 72 815-819<br />

Thomas, Craig. The Specular Microscopy Primer. KONAN Medical.<br />

Kanski, J. Clinical Ophthalmology, 6 th Edition. 2007. Butterworth Heinemann: Toronto.<br />

Duovisc product insert, Alcon.<br />

THANK YOU!<br />

QUESTIONS<br />

Coursebook Page 58 of 139<br />

5


5/29/2012<br />

Objective<br />

• Corneal infections are a common and sight-threatening condition which<br />

can progress very quickly, leading to extensive corneal tissue<br />

destruction and possible perforation.<br />

BIC TRINH O.D<br />

EYECARE ASSOCIATES OF NEVADA<br />

Case Report: Persistent epithelial defect<br />

in post-corneal graft<br />

• Being able to recognize and appropriately treat these conditions is<br />

critical in preserving vision. Today we will review the different etiologies,<br />

appropriate work up and management of different corneal infections.<br />

J.G 57 yo male<br />

Entrance testing<br />

• Patient<br />

◦ 57 Y.O Hispanic Male<br />

◦ Hx of longstanding corneal ulcer, OS<br />

• HPI<br />

◦ (+) mild watery discharge, photophobia, foreign body sensation<br />

◦ No h/o contact lens wear, outdoor activity, trauma<br />

• Gtts<br />

◦ Durezol tid OS x 3 mo<br />

• Oc Hx<br />

◦ Penetrating keratoplasty OS x 20 years<br />

• Medical Hx:<br />

◦ Heart disease<br />

◦ Arthritis<br />

◦ NIDDM<br />

◦ Elevated cholesterol<br />

• VA (sc)<br />

◦ OD 20/30-<br />

◦ OS 20/100+ PH/60<br />

• Tonometry<br />

◦ Deferred<br />

• MR:<br />

◦ OD +2.75-1.00x115 20/20<br />

◦ OS +4.00 DS 20/60<br />

Exam<br />

<strong>Differential</strong> diagnosis<br />

• Anterior segment<br />

◦ OS:<br />

Conjunctiva: 2 + injection<br />

Cornea:<br />

Graft intact<br />

1 mm epithelial defect with surrounding infiltrate, 6:00<br />

60-70% stromal thinning<br />

Diffuse corneal haze<br />

Anterior Chamber<br />

D/ 2+ mixed cell<br />

1 mm hypopyon<br />

Lens<br />

3 +NSC<br />

◦ Bacterial keratitis<br />

Gram (-)<br />

Pseudomonas<br />

Gram (+)<br />

S. Epidermis, S. Aureus,<br />

S. Pneumoniae<br />

◦ Herpetic eye disease<br />

Herpes Simplex Keratitis<br />

◦ Fungal keratitis<br />

Fusarium, Aspergillus,<br />

Candida<br />

◦ Persistent epithelial defect<br />

Toxicity<br />

Autoimmune<br />

Ocular surface disease<br />

◦ Acanthomoeba<br />

Coursebook Page 59 of 139<br />

1


5/29/2012<br />

Impression<br />

1 day follow up<br />

• Impression<br />

◦ Bacterial keratitis vs. Persistent epithelial defect, OS<br />

◦ S/p PKP, OS<br />

• Plan<br />

◦ Culture<br />

◦ D/C Durezol<br />

◦ Fortified vancomycin, fortified tobramycin q1h OS<br />

◦ Erythromycin ung qid OS<br />

◦ F/u 1 day<br />

• HPI: improved pain<br />

• Anterior segment<br />

◦ Cornea<br />

(+) graft edema<br />

1mm ED, 60-70% thinning<br />

Haze improved<br />

◦ Anterior chamber<br />

1+ cell<br />

Hypopyon resolved<br />

• Culture<br />

◦ Gram stain: No organisms observed<br />

◦ Media: No growth<br />

• Impression<br />

◦ Non-healing epithelial defect, OS<br />

◦ Graft failure, OS<br />

• Plan<br />

◦ Vancomycin, Tobramycin q3h OS<br />

◦ Erythromycin ung qid OS<br />

Follow up<br />

Follow up<br />

• 5 day f/u<br />

• 1 week f/u<br />

• 2 week f/u<br />

• 6 week f/u<br />

• Anterior segment<br />

• Anterior segment<br />

• Anterior segment<br />

• Anterior segment<br />

◦ Cornea<br />

◦ Cornea<br />

◦ Cornea<br />

◦ Cornea<br />

0.6mm ED, 50% thinning<br />

◦ Anterior chamber<br />

• Plan<br />

D/Q<br />

◦ Vancomycin, Tobramycin,<br />

Erythromycin ung qid<br />

No ED, 50% thinning<br />

1.5 mm V x 1.2 mm H stromal<br />

opacity<br />

• Plan<br />

◦ D/C Vancomycin, Tobramycin<br />

◦ Erythromycin ung qid OS<br />

◦ Lotemax qid OS<br />

1.5 mm V x 1.2 mm H stromal<br />

opacity, 10% thinning<br />

Microcystic edema<br />

Pachs 777 microns<br />

IOP 13/13<br />

• Plan<br />

◦ PF qid OS<br />

Stromal opacity<br />

Microcystic edema<br />

IOP 14/17<br />

• Plan<br />

◦ Taper PF slowly<br />

◦ Possible repeat graft with<br />

phacoemulsification OS to<br />

improve vision<br />

Persistent epithelial defect<br />

Persistent ED: Causes<br />

• Presentation<br />

◦ Foreign body sensation,<br />

photophobia, corneal<br />

hypoesthesia<br />

◦ Central/paracentral or<br />

inferior/inferonasal<br />

◦ Epithelial defect with heaped<br />

edges<br />

◦ Underlying stromal<br />

inflammation<br />

◦ Resistant to maximum<br />

therapy<br />

Topical agents<br />

Auto-immune<br />

Ocular surface disease<br />

Neurotrophic keratitis<br />

Trauma<br />

Aminoglycosides, trifluoridine,<br />

antimetabolites<br />

Sjogren’s syndrome, RA, graft-versushost<br />

disease<br />

Dry eye, exposure keratopathy, atopy,<br />

rosacea, ocular pemphigoid, mooren’s<br />

ulcer, limbal stem cell deficiency, RCE,<br />

bullous keratopathy<br />

Anesthetic abuse, acanthomoeba<br />

keratitis, HSK, HZO<br />

Underlying foreign body, local<br />

irradiation, contact lens use<br />

Coursebook Page 60 of 139<br />

2


5/29/2012<br />

Management<br />

Management<br />

• Obtain corneal culture<br />

• Cycloplegic agent<br />

• Treatment aimed towards surface healing and preventing stromal melt<br />

◦ Stop/ taper medications toxic to epithelium<br />

◦ Lubrication (non-preserved)<br />

◦ BCL<br />

◦ Orals<br />

Omega-3 FA<br />

Doxycycline<br />

• Poor response to previous therapy<br />

◦ Autologous serum<br />

◦ Oral acyclovir<br />

◦ Systemic evaluation<br />

The use of autologous serum tears in persistent corneal epithelial defects<br />

Eye (2004) 18, 609–614 A L Young, A C O Cheng, H K Ng, L Cheng, G Y S Leung and D S C Lam<br />

Healing within<br />

Current series=10<br />

2 weeks (effective) 6 (60%)<br />

1 month (partially effective) 0 (0%)<br />

>1 month (ineffective) 2 (20%)<br />

Defaulted 2 (20%)<br />

ADEs 0 (0%)<br />

Management<br />

AMT with tarsorraphy<br />

• Surgical options<br />

◦ Punctal occlusion<br />

◦ Total tarsorrhaphy<br />

◦ AMT graft with tarsorraphy<br />

◦ PKP<br />

• Amniotic membrane graft<br />

◦ (Amniograft® 2.5x 2.0 cm) placed in<br />

layers<br />

◦ Larger piece of AM placed (stromal<br />

side down) placed over layers<br />

◦ BCL<br />

◦ Tarsorraphy<br />

• ProKera<br />

• Prospective studies<br />

◦ Lee et al (Bascom Palmer), 1997: AMT<br />

performed in 11 pts with PED. 10 pts<br />

healed in 2-6wks without recurrence for 3-<br />

15 mos<br />

◦ Pachigolla et al (<strong>University</strong> of Texas SW),<br />

2009: 20 eyes with ProKera implant for<br />

avg of 25.3 days. 12 eyes noticed<br />

increase in acuity. 5 eyes noticed PED<br />

with removal of device<br />

Bacterial keratitis<br />

Bacterial keratitis<br />

◦ S. Epidermis, S. Aureus, S.<br />

Pneumoniae<br />

◦ Gram (+) cocci<br />

◦ S. Aereus binds to exposed<br />

components of Bowman’s and<br />

stroma<br />

◦ Pseudomonas aeruginosa<br />

◦ Gram (-) rod<br />

◦ P aeruginosa binds to molecular<br />

receptors on exposed epithelial cells<br />

• Presentation<br />

◦ Pain, decreased vision, redness, suppuration<br />

◦ Sharply demarcated epithelial defect<br />

◦ Stromal edema<br />

◦ A/C reaction<br />

◦ Stromal thinning/necrosis<br />

• Risk factors<br />

◦ Contact lens*<br />

◦ Trauma<br />

◦ Medications<br />

◦ Impaired defense mechanisms<br />

Coursebook Page 61 of 139<br />

3


5/29/2012<br />

Management<br />

Management<br />

• Initial therapy<br />

◦ D/C contact lens<br />

◦ Small (


5/29/2012<br />

Fungal keratitis<br />

Fungal keratitis<br />

• 5-10% of keratitis are fungal in<br />

nature<br />

• More common warmer, humid<br />

climate<br />

• Aspergillus, Candida, and<br />

Fusarium<br />

• Risk Factors<br />

◦ Ocular trauma from plant<br />

◦ Contact lens wear<br />

◦ Immunosuppression<br />

◦ Medications<br />

◦ Penetrating keratoplasty<br />

• Presentation<br />

◦ Gray-white infiltrate<br />

◦ Satellite or branching lesions<br />

◦ A/C reaction<br />

◦ May invade iris or posterior chamber<br />

Fungal keratitis<br />

Acanthamoeba<br />

• Management<br />

◦ Topical:<br />

natamycin 5% suspension: effective against most cases<br />

amphotericin B 0.15%-0.30%<br />

◦ Oral: Effect on keratitis is limited secondary to poor penetration and systemic<br />

side effects<br />

ketoconazole 200-600 mg/day<br />

fluconazole 200-400 mg/day<br />

◦ Typical treatment time is 1 month but can be used for several months<br />

◦ Repeat smears may be necessary<br />

• Protozoa<br />

• Highly resistant<br />

• 70% of cases related to contact lens use<br />

Acanthamoeba<br />

Acanthamoeba<br />

• Presentation<br />

◦ Severe pain, photophobia, decreased vision<br />

◦ Epithelial defect<br />

◦ Ring shaped infiltrate<br />

◦ Keratoneuritis<br />

◦ A/C reaction<br />

• Management<br />

◦ Mechanical debridement<br />

◦ Topical therapy (must be compounded)<br />

Biguanides:<br />

Chlorhexidine gluconate 0.02%(CHG) q1h<br />

Polyhexamethylene biguanide 0.02%(PHMB) (Bacquicil) q1h<br />

Diamidines:<br />

Brolene<br />

Desmodine<br />

Coursebook Page 63 of 139<br />

5


5/29/2012<br />

Microbiology<br />

Microbiology<br />

• When is laboratory evaluation by culture<br />

recommended<br />

◦ Size<br />

◦ Depth<br />

◦ Chronic in nature<br />

◦ Atypical features/ history<br />

• How to obtain sample<br />

◦ Topical anesthetic (proparacaine hydrocholoride)<br />

◦ Scrape material from border as well as base of ulcer<br />

◦ Inoculate onto solid media by streaking rows of C’s<br />

Media/Smear<br />

Culture<br />

Chocolate agar<br />

Most bacteria, Haemophilus,<br />

Neisseria, Moraxella<br />

Blood agar<br />

Most bacteria, yeast, fungi<br />

Sabourad’s agar<br />

Non-nutrient agar<br />

Gram stain<br />

Most fungi, yeast<br />

Acanthamoeba<br />

Bacteria<br />

Pearls<br />

References<br />

• Careful history<br />

◦ Systemic history<br />

◦ Prior ocular history<br />

◦ Medications<br />

• Examination<br />

◦ Documentation of defect<br />

◦ Observe structures around eye<br />

◦ Take notice of unique features<br />

• Treatment<br />

◦ Initiate aggressive therapy<br />

◦ Have complete list of DDx<br />

◦ Remember guidelines for culturing<br />

• Price F.W, Price M.O, Letko E. Curbside Consultation in Cornea and External Disease. Indianapolis,<br />

IN: Slack Incorporated;2010: 119-130.<br />

• Cohen EJ, Rapuano CJ. Bacteria keratitis, fungal keratitis, Acanthamoeba, herpes simplex virus,<br />

herpes zoster virus. In Kunimoto DY, Kanitkar KD, Maker MS, Friedberg MA, Rapuano CJ, eds. The<br />

Wills Eye Manual: Office and Emergency Room <strong>Diagnosis</strong> and Treatment of Eye Disease. 4 th ed.<br />

Philadelphia, PA: Lippencott Williams and Wilkins. 2004:52-65.<br />

• Sutphin JE, Dana MR, Florakis GJ. Basic and Clinical Science Course: External Disease and Cornea.<br />

Singapore; 2007: 113-189.<br />

• KrachmerJH, Mannis M, III. Holland EJ. Cornea: Fundamentals, <strong>Diagnosis</strong> and Management. Vol 1.<br />

China;1997:277-307.<br />

• Pachigolla G, Prasher P, Di Pascuale MA. Evaluation of the role of ProKera in the management of<br />

ocular surface and orbital disorders. Eye Contact Lens. 2009 Jul;35(4):172-5.<br />

• Lee SH, Tseng SC. Amniotic membrane transplantation for persistent epithelial defects with ulceration.<br />

Am J Ophthalmology. 1997 Mar; 123(3):303-12.<br />

• Seitz B, Das S, Saur R. Amniotic membrane transplantation for persistent corneal epithelial defects in<br />

eyes after penetrating keratoplasty. Eye (London). 2009 Apr;23(4):840-8<br />

Coursebook Page 64 of 139<br />

6


5/29/2012<br />

Chief Complaint<br />

Blebitis<br />

• Amy Pedersen, OD<br />

• Portland VA Medical Center<br />

• “Rust colored film over my eye”<br />

– Present for 2 days, stable, (‐)pain and (‐)discharge<br />

– Secondary Complaint<br />

• Mild upper left lid tenderness<br />

• Present for the past 3 days, stable<br />

• Self treating with tobramycin QID x 2 days with no<br />

resolution or decrease in symptoms<br />

Ocular History<br />

– Advanced primary open angle glaucoma OU<br />

– S/P trabeculectomy 1991 OU ( UC Davis), revision for<br />

leak in 1995 at PVAMC OD<br />

– Non‐exudative age related macular degeneration<br />

OS>OD, AREDS category 2<br />

– Diabetes mellitus type 2 with mild non‐proliferative<br />

diabetic retinopathy OS only<br />

– Pseudophakia OU s/p cataract extraction at PVAMC<br />

Medications<br />

– Amlodipine besylate, Aspirin (81mg), Insulin (aspart),<br />

Insulin (glargine), Lisinopril, Metoprolol succinate,<br />

Ranitidine, Simvastatin<br />

– Glaucoma: timolol maleate 0.5% oph soln, 1 gtt OU bid<br />

Medical History<br />

– Diabetes mellitus type 2, diagnosed in 1998 (Last A1C 8.1<br />

on 09/13/11)<br />

– Hypertension<br />

– Hyperlipidemia<br />

– GERD<br />

Pertinent Findings‐ 09/16/11<br />

• Visual Acuity: 20/25 OD, 20/30‐2 (PH: 20/25‐2) OS<br />

• Anterior Segment<br />

– Lids/ Lashes: 1+ MGD OU<br />

– Cornea: temporal incisional scar OU<br />

– Conjunctiva:<br />

• OD: temporal pinguecula, trab scar at 12 o'clock<br />

• OS: 1+ injection, trab scar with partial opacity at 12<br />

o'clock with surrounding 2+ injection<br />

– Cornea: temporal incisional scar OU<br />

– Ant. Chamber: OD: Deep & Quiet, OS: trace cells, (‐)flare<br />

– Iris: Normal OU, (‐)NVI<br />

• GAT @4:31pm OD: 17mmHg OS: 8mmHg (Seidel testing<br />

questioned pinpoint leak)<br />

Coursebook Page 65 of 139<br />

1


5/29/2012<br />

Pertinent Findings Contd…<br />

• Posterior Segment<br />

– Lens: PC IOL OU<br />

– Vitreous: OD: Clear OS: PVD; (‐)VH OU<br />

– Optic disc:<br />

• OD: 0.9/0.9; advanced cupping with 3+ pallor; (‐)NVD<br />

• OS: 0.7/0.7; cupping with 2+ pallor; (‐)NVD<br />

– Macula: scattered pinpoint drusen, trace‐1+ RPE changes ; (‐<br />

)CSME OU<br />

– Vitreous: OD: Clear OS: PVD; (‐)VH OU<br />

– Vessels: Normal OU<br />

– (+)Dot/blot heme OS inferior nasally, (‐)Dot/blot heme OD;<br />

(+)MA's OS inferior nasal to disc, (‐)MAs OU; (‐)Hard Exudates<br />

OU; (‐)CWS OU; (‐)IRMA OU; (‐)VB OU; (‐)NVE OU<br />

– Posterior Pole and Periphery:<br />

• OS: chorodial detachment ora to equator 360, (‐)vit cells<br />

• OD: no rips, holes or tears 360 OU<br />

Assessment/Plan<br />

• Blebitis with choridal detachment OS, reduced pressure OS<br />

• Instill 1gtt Vigamox OS q15min in office immediately as<br />

loading dose<br />

• Admit as inpatient‐ Moxifloxacin 1gtt q1h overnight<br />

• RTC tomorrow morning in Eye Medical Retina<br />

Follow Up #1 (9/17/11)<br />

– Relevant Findings<br />

• Visual Acuity: 20/25‐1 OD, 20/70‐2 (PH: 20/70‐1) OS<br />

• Conjunctiva OS: significant superior 2‐3+ bleb injection, Seidel<br />

positive centrally, purulent appearance<br />

• Ant. Chamber: OS: 1+ cell with trace pigmented cell<br />

• GAT@9:00am OD: 21 mmHg OS: 2 mmHg<br />

• Choroidal detachment 360 degrees OS, (‐)vitreous cell and flare<br />

– Assessment/Plan<br />

• Blebitis OS ‐ appears to be clinically improving, with no evidence<br />

of endopthalmitis.<br />

• Continue Vigamox q1h during daytime, q3h at night; intiate 1gtt<br />

atropine qd OS, timolol 0.5% bid OD only<br />

• RTC 2 days in Eye Medical Retina<br />

Follow Up #2 (9/19/11)<br />

– Chief Complaint: Follow up of blebitis OS. Soreness same as before.<br />

Feels that OS is blurry. Moxifloxacin q1h in daytime, q3‐4 h at night<br />

OS, 1% Atropine qd OS, 0.5% timolol bid OD.<br />

– Relevant Findings<br />

• Visual Acuity: 20/25‐2 OD, 20/150 (PH 20/50‐2) OS<br />

• Cornea: OS mild superior thinning and vascularization near the blebitis, some<br />

Descemets folds, bleb has infiltration in the center, Seidel positive in center of<br />

the bleb, 2+conj injection superiorly<br />

• Anterior Chamber: OS rare cells<br />

• GAT@3:33pm OD: 12 mmHg OS: 0 mmHg<br />

• Posterior Pole & Peripheral Retina: 360 degree choroidal detachment OS<br />

– Assessment/Plan<br />

• Blebitis with leak OS, resolving anterior chamber reaction with hypotony and<br />

choroidal detachment OS<br />

• Cont Moxifloxacin q1h in the day and q3‐4h at night,1% Atropine eye drops OS<br />

qd and 0.5% timolol bid OD<br />

• Will schedule for bleb revision , tomorrow if possible<br />

Bleb Revision Surgery‐ 1 day post‐op<br />

– Relevant Findings<br />

• VA: 20/200 OS; PH not performed<br />

• Superior bleb revision, (‐)Seidel with intact sutures<br />

• GAT@9:45am OS: 23 mmHg with distorted mires<br />

– Assessment/Plan<br />

• One day post bleb revision with patch graft OS‐ good<br />

closure with no leaks, mild ocular HTN today<br />

• Start Pred Forte q2‐3 hours OS and Vigamox QID OS and<br />

Cosopt BID OS, continue timolol bid OD<br />

1 week post‐op (9/26/11)<br />

– Relevant Findings<br />

• VA OD: 20/25‐ OS: 20/50‐2; PH not performed<br />

• Conjunctivia OS‐ Seidel negative with 1 pair of nylon suture<br />

ends that are mildly exposed, all other suture ends are<br />

vicryls<br />

• GAT@9:37am OD: 16 OS: 14<br />

– Assessment/Plan<br />

• One week post bleb revision with patch graft OS, good<br />

closure with no leaks. Nylon suture ends cut at slit lamp.<br />

• Improved IOP with topical Cosopt, taper Pred to QID OS, D/C<br />

Cosopt OS; continue 0.5% timolol bid OD<br />

• RTC 1 week<br />

Coursebook Page 66 of 139<br />

2


5/29/2012<br />

2 week post‐op (10/3/11)<br />

– Relevant Findings<br />

• VA: 20/25 OD, 20/40 OS; PH not performed<br />

• Conjunctivia OS‐ Seidel positive with slow leak along<br />

perilimbal bleb, otherwise intact<br />

• GAT@11:15am OD: 18 mmHg OS: 11 mmHg<br />

– Assessment/Plan<br />

• Bandage Contact Lens OS<br />

• Taper Pred BID OS, restart Vigamox with bandage CL;<br />

continue 0.5% timolol bid OD<br />

• RTC 10/07/11<br />

2.5 week post‐op (10/7/11)<br />

– Relevant Findings<br />

• VA: 20/25‐1 OS<br />

• Conjunctivia OS‐ trace injection of superior conj with<br />

white bled, Seidel negative even with pressure applied<br />

• GAT@2:41pm OS: 18 mmHg<br />

• Choroid attached 360 OS<br />

– Assessment/Plan<br />

• Removed Bandage Contact Lens OS<br />

• Continue Pred Forte BID, D/C Vigmaox OS, start 0.5%<br />

timolol qAM OS; continue 0.5% timolol bid OD<br />

• RTC 2 weeks<br />

1 month post‐op (10/24/11)<br />

– Relevant Findings<br />

• VA: 20/30 OD, 20/50 OS; PH not performed<br />

• Conjunctivia OS‐ trace injection of superior conj with white<br />

bleb, Seidel negative even with pressure applied<br />

• GAT@10:55pm OD: 15mmHg OS: 16 mmHg<br />

– Assessment/Plan<br />

• Post bleb revision with patch graft OS, IOP trending up<br />

though bleb is filtering, currently on 0.5% timolol qAM OS<br />

• 5‐FU subconj OS injection today<br />

• Increase Pred Forte to QID OS, continue 0.5% timolol qAM<br />

OS; continue 0.5% timolol bid OD<br />

• RTC 11/09/11 and PRN<br />

6 week post‐op (11/9/11)<br />

– Relevant Findings<br />

• VA: 20/40 OS; PH not performed<br />

• Conjunctivia OS‐ quiet with nice diffuse bleb, sutures intact,<br />

negative Seidel<br />

• GAT @10:00am OS: 14mmHg<br />

– Assessment/Plan<br />

• Post bleb revision with patch graft OS, good IOP control<br />

(with adjunctive medical therapy‐ patient is on 0.5% timolol<br />

qAM OS); s/p 5 FU on 10/24/11<br />

• 5‐FU subconj OS injection today (2 nd injection)<br />

• Continue Pred Forte to QID OS, discontinue 0.5% timolol<br />

qAM OS to encourage filtration<br />

• RTC 11/28/11 and PRN<br />

9 week post‐op (11/28/11)<br />

– Relevant Findings<br />

• VA: 20/40 OS, PH 20/30+2<br />

• Conjunctivia OS‐ quiet with nice diffuse bleb, sutures<br />

intact, Seidel negative<br />

• GAT@3:17pm OS: 16mmHg<br />

– Assessment/Plan<br />

• Post bleb revision with patch graft OS, good IOP control<br />

WITHOUT glaucoma drops; s/p 5‐FU injection x 2<br />

• 5 FU subconj OS injection today (3 rd injection)<br />

• Continue Pred Forte QID OS<br />

• RTC 3 weeks and PRN.<br />

3 month post‐op (12/19/11)<br />

– Relevant Findings<br />

• VA: 20/40 OD, 20/40 OS; PH: not performed<br />

• Refraction: +0.50 OD (20/25) ‐0.75 OS (20/25) +2.50 add<br />

OU<br />

• Conjunctivia OS‐ nicely elevated scarred bleb OS, Seidel<br />

negative<br />

• GAT@1:25pm OD: 15mmHg OS: 13mmHg<br />

– Assessment/Plan<br />

• Post bleb revision with patch graft OS, good IOP control<br />

WITHOUT glaucoma drops; s/p 5‐FU injection x 3<br />

• Taper Pred Forte TID OS<br />

• Order VA issued bifocal spectacles<br />

• RTC 4 weeks and PRN.<br />

Coursebook Page 67 of 139<br />

3


5/29/2012<br />

4 month post‐op (4/30/12)<br />

<strong>Differential</strong> Diagnoses<br />

– Relevant Findings<br />

• VA: 20/25 OD, 20/25 OS<br />

• Conjunctivia OS‐ nicely elevated scarred bleb OS, Seidel<br />

negative<br />

• GAT@12:35pm OD: 17mmHg OS: 11mmHg<br />

– Assessment/Plan<br />

• Post bleb revision with patch graft OS, good IOP<br />

control; s/p 5 FU injection x 3<br />

• Taper Pred Forte BID OS<br />

• RTC 2 months in glaucoma clinic and PRN<br />

– Blebitis<br />

– Endophthalmitis<br />

– Episcleritis<br />

– Conjunctivitis<br />

– Anterior uveitis<br />

– Ischemic bleb<br />

– Choroidal Detachment<br />

– Retinal Detachment<br />

– Melanoma of ciliary<br />

body<br />

– Melanoma of the<br />

choroid<br />

Presentation<br />

– Serious complication of trabeculectomy that<br />

requires immediate and aggressive treatment<br />

– “White on Red” appearance with white bleb and<br />

surrounding conjunctival hyperemia<br />

– Patients will typically present with mild discomfort<br />

and redness<br />

– May be associated with mild anterior chamber<br />

reaction but no vitritis is present<br />

Risk Factors<br />

• Use of antimetabolites such as mitomycin C and 5‐<br />

fluorouracil in surgery greatly increase the success rate<br />

of the surgery by inhibiting fibroblast proliferation;<br />

however, risk of infection increases because the<br />

procedure is more likely to result in a thin avascular<br />

bleb<br />

• Younger age<br />

• African American race<br />

• Inferiorly placed blebs<br />

• Chronic blepharitis<br />

TRUE EMERGENCY<br />

– Potential Complications‐ hyptonous maculopathy,<br />

choroidal detachment, endophthalmitis<br />

– An infected bleb with severe anterior chamber<br />

reaction with or without hypopyon, vitritis or a<br />

positive vitreous culture is endophthalmitis; signs<br />

and symptoms include severe pain and reduction<br />

of vision, redness and discharge<br />

• If visibility is limited perform a B‐scan ultrasound to<br />

determine the presence of vitiritis<br />

Serous Choroidal Detachment<br />

– Caused by hypotony<br />

– Swelling of the suprachoroidal space limited by<br />

firm attachment of the choroid at the vortex veins<br />

• treat the underlying cause<br />

– Choroid will spontaneously reattach as pressure<br />

increases and stabilizes<br />

– Verhoeff streaks can be present after<br />

reattachment<br />

Coursebook Page 68 of 139<br />

4


5/29/2012<br />

Bleb Revision<br />

– Increased risk of re‐infection after initial blebitis;<br />

significant risk of bleb revision failure<br />

– If leak persists after treating the infection, send for<br />

revision<br />

• Post Bleb Revision Leak<br />

– Bandage contact lens‐ restart topical antibiotics<br />

for prophylactic coverage<br />

Clinical Pearls<br />

• Blebitis is a SERIOUS complication‐ treat immediately and<br />

aggressively to prevent endophthalmitis (admission to hospital is<br />

often indicated)<br />

• Priority #1‐ Treat the Infection before addressing the hypotony: do<br />

not send for an operation until you sterilize the area, otherwise the<br />

infection could worsen<br />

– Many leaks have continuous outflow and very few bacteria can swim<br />

upstream (be more concerned if fluid is moving in and out, consider<br />

monitoring twice a day or hospitalization<br />

• Be a painter‐ Seidel testing with multiple stacked fluorescein strips<br />

• Patient education is critical‐ Instruct patients with blebs to seek<br />

help IMMEDIATELY in the event of any redness, discharge,<br />

decreased vision or photophobia<br />

References<br />

• Ordan JL, Catey B, Melville MM, et al. Risk factors for development of post trabeculectomy<br />

endophthalmitis. Br J Ophthalmol 2000:84:1349‐1353.<br />

• Muckley ED, Lehrer RA. Late‐onset blebitis and endophthalmitis:incidence and outcomes with<br />

mitomycin C. Optom VisSci. 2004;81:499–504.<br />

• Soltau JB, Rothman RF, Budenz DL, Greenfield DS, Feuer W, Liebmann JM, Ritch R. Risk factors for<br />

glaucoma filtering bleb infections. Arch Ophthalmol 2000;118:338‐42.<br />

• Kanski, J. (2006). Clinical ophthalmology: A systemic approach, Sixth edition. New York: Butterworth<br />

Heinemann Elsevier.<br />

• Bartlett, J.D., & Janus,S.D. (2008). Clinical Ocular Pharmacology. St Lousi: Butterworth Heinman<br />

Elsevier.<br />

• Kais, P. K., & Friedman, N.J. (2004). The Massachusetts eye and ear infirmary illustrated manual of<br />

ophthalmology, Second edition. Philadelphia: Saunders.<br />

• Rhee, Douglas J. The fine art of managing blebitis. Review of ophthalmology online. May 2, 2011.<br />

Coursebook Page 69 of 139<br />

5


5/29/2012<br />

Case Presentation<br />

• 83 year old Caucasian male<br />

• Presented for routine exam 9/2011<br />

• ONH asymmetry noted<br />

◦ FDT screening visual field performed<br />

ERIN J. BENDER<br />

NORTHWEST RESIDENTS CONFERENCE<br />

JUNE 4, 2012<br />

My Initial Visit<br />

• Patient asymptomatic to field loss<br />

• Systemic History:<br />

◦ Impaired fasting glucose<br />

• Ocular History:<br />

◦ Past examinations reveal:<br />

No h/o of diabetic retinopathy OU<br />

Early lens changes OU<br />

Presbyopia OU<br />

Examination Results<br />

Posterior Segment<br />

• VA sc OD 20/20-1 OS 20/25-1<br />

• EOMs full and smooth OU<br />

• CF FTFC OU<br />

• Anterior segment remarkable for 1+ NS OU<br />

• IOP OD 15 mmHg OS 15 mmHg<br />

• +APD OS<br />

◦ Pt reports 50% brightness OS compared to OD<br />

OD: Blurred disc margins with elevation,<br />

greatest N<br />

Macula flat and intact<br />

Peripheral retina: scattered hard drusen<br />

and reticular degeneration<br />

OS: Blurred disc margins with elevation,<br />

greatest N, SN and IN<br />

Macula flat and intact<br />

Peripheral retina: scattered hard drusen<br />

and reticular degeneration<br />

Coursebook Page 70 of 139<br />

1


5/29/2012<br />

Is this Papilledema<br />

Did You KNOW<br />

• Papilledema<br />

◦ Increased intracranial pressure<br />

• Pseudopapilledema<br />

◦ Congenital anomalous disc<br />

◦ Peripapillary myelinated NFL<br />

◦ Crowded disc with hypermetropia<br />

◦ OPTIC DISC DRUSEN<br />

• “Druse” is a German word<br />

• It means a crystal-lined hollow space in a rock<br />

• Was widely used in the mining industry in the 16 th<br />

century.<br />

Clinical Presentation: Optic Disc Drusen<br />

• Blurred disc margins<br />

• Scalloped disc borders<br />

• NO obscuration of surrounding vasculature<br />

• Non-hyperemic disc, no dilated capillaries<br />

• Multi-lobulated refractile bodies (if visible)<br />

• Trifurcations of the blood vessels<br />

• No elevation to surrounding NFL<br />

Incidence<br />

Demographic Presentation<br />

• ~1% of general population<br />

• Increases to ~3.4% in patients with relatives of the<br />

same diagnosis<br />

• Questionable AD inheritance pattern, described as<br />

“irregular dominant fashion”<br />

• 75 to 85% BILATERAL presentation<br />

• Equality in sex distribution<br />

• Caucasians higher incidence<br />

◦ Theory: African Americans tend to have larger scleral canal<br />

sizes as compared to Caucasians<br />

Coursebook Page 71 of 139<br />

2


5/29/2012<br />

Histology<br />

Pathophysiology<br />

• Acellular<br />

◦ Mucopolysaccharides<br />

◦ Amino acids<br />

◦ Ribonucleic and desoxyribonucleic acid<br />

◦ Calcium<br />

◦ Small amounts of iron<br />

• Range from 5 to 1000 microns in diameter<br />

• Deposits anterior to the lamina cribrosa, in 90%<br />

behind the level of Bruch’s membrane<br />

3 THEORIES OF FORMATION OF ODD<br />

Congenital Dysplasia of the optic nerve head<br />

and blood supply<br />

Axoplasmic stasis secondary to crowded disc<br />

Small scleral canal size<br />

Or an amalgamation<br />

Tso’s Theory<br />

Development and Progression<br />

Theory: ABNORMAL<br />

AXONAL METABOLISM<br />

LEADING TO<br />

INTRACELLULAR<br />

MITOCHONDRIAL<br />

CALCIFICATION<br />

Axonal rupture<br />

Mitochondrial extrusion<br />

into extracellular space<br />

Calcium continues to<br />

deposit into extracellular<br />

mitochondria<br />

(Ca2+ concentration<br />

higher than within cell)<br />

Small calcified<br />

microbodies produced<br />

Calcium continue to be<br />

deposited on the surface,<br />

forming drusen<br />

• Labeled as “buried” in young children and adults.<br />

Visibility increases with age secondary to axonal<br />

atrophy and continuing calcium deposition.<br />

• Tend to present or become “unburied” on INFERIOR<br />

NASAL portion of ONH.<br />

• 75% of ODD patients will develop some form of<br />

visual field loss.<br />

• Visual acuity tends to be well preserved.<br />

End Stage<br />

Associated Conditions<br />

• Gradual worsening and compromise to vasculature<br />

and nerve fiber layer can result in:<br />

◦ Anterior Ischemic Optic Neuropathy<br />

Related to mechanical forces<br />

Patients tend to be in mid 20s or younger<br />

Without systemic cardiovascular disease<br />

◦ Compressive CRVO/CRAO<br />

Secondary to impairment of blood flow<br />

◦ Juxtapapillary Choroidal Neovascularization<br />

Secondary to chronic ischemia<br />

• Pseudoxanthoma elasticum<br />

◦ Range from 1.4 to 3.6% association with ODD<br />

◦ Elastin lines the insertion of lamina cribrosa<br />

◦ Abnormal accumulation of polyanions with high calcium<br />

affinity acts as triggering factor for mineralization<br />

• Angioid streaks<br />

◦ Theory that a common defect of abnormal mineralization<br />

predisposes for ODD and angioid streaks<br />

• Retinitis Pigmentosa<br />

◦ Range from 0 to 10% association with ODD<br />

◦ Deposits often found ADJACENT to normal sized disc<br />

Coursebook Page 72 of 139<br />

3


5/29/2012<br />

Diagnostic Testing<br />

Our Case: Visual Field 24-2<br />

• Visual Field<br />

◦ Typically arcuate defects on VF<br />

◦ Enlarged blind spot (less common)<br />

◦ Visible drusen tend to show higher mean deviation<br />

◦ Patients tend to be unaware of visual field defect<br />

VF defects do NOT have direct correlation<br />

with location of drusen!!<br />

Diagnostic Testing<br />

Our Case: Auto fluorescent Photos<br />

• Fluorescein Angiography<br />

◦ Faint diffuse hyper fluorescence of ONH early with late well<br />

defined hyper fluoresce without leakage<br />

OD<br />

OS<br />

• Auto fluorescent Photography<br />

◦ Hyper-reflective lesions within the ONH on photo<br />

◦ Are NOT bi-refringent<br />

◦ Higher sensitivity for detecting buried drusen than<br />

ophthalmoscopy but lower than Bscan<br />

Diagnostic Testing<br />

• Optical Coherence Tomography<br />

◦ Monitor NFL loss<br />

◦ Eyes with buried disc drusen often do NOT show NFL loss<br />

◦ Reveals irregular and discontinuous elevations at ONH<br />

◦ Rounded HYPO-reflectant appearance<br />

• B-scan ultrasonography<br />

◦ STANDARD OF CARE<br />

◦ Hyper reflectance at ONH that persists at low gain settings.<br />

Coursebook Page 73 of 139<br />

4


5/29/2012<br />

OUR CASE:<br />

OCT<br />

FINDINGS<br />

OD and OS elevated<br />

NRR thickness<br />

Sup and Inf NFL<br />

loss OS<br />

Diagnostic Testing<br />

• Optical Coherence Tomography<br />

◦ Monitor NFL loss<br />

◦ Eyes with buried disc drusen often do NOT show NFL loss<br />

◦ Reveals irregular and discontinuous elevations at ONH<br />

◦ Rounded HYPO reflectant appearance<br />

• B-scan ultrasonography<br />

◦ STANDARD OF CARE<br />

◦ Hyper fluorescence at ONH that persists at low gain settings<br />

Our Case: Bscan<br />

OS Bscan at Low Gain<br />

OD at medium gain<br />

OS at medium gain<br />

Treatment<br />

Papilledema versus Pseudopapilledema<br />

• Most cases managed with serial VF testing, IOP<br />

monitoring and NFL analysis.<br />

• No definitive treatment. Not all cases are treated.<br />

• Intraocular pressure lowering agents may be used<br />

with goal of protecting the remaining NFL.<br />

◦ If due to mechanical compression, lowering IOP may alleviate<br />

the process.<br />

◦ Blood flow to ONH may be improved with use of antihypertensives,<br />

potentially reducing chance of vascular events.<br />

• Save healthcare dollars: Diagnostic testing is<br />

expensive and sometimes unnecessary.<br />

• Unduly stress for the patient: Reassurance against<br />

potential morbid outcome.<br />

Coursebook Page 74 of 139<br />

5


5/29/2012<br />

MRI<br />

To scan or not to scan<br />

$$$$$$<br />

36 YO WF referral with “asymptomatic<br />

bilateral disc edema”.<br />

Remote h/o HA and previous work-up.<br />

Past imaging revealed pineal cyst.<br />

Visual Field Results<br />

Fundus Exam<br />

Bscan Results<br />

Bumps in the Nerve<br />

OD: at high and low gains<br />

OS: at high and low gains<br />

• What is the true mechanism<br />

◦ Is scleral size really a risk factor<br />

• What are the genetics<br />

• Is IOP lowering truly beneficial<br />

• Is there an unknown modifiable risk<br />

• Research opportunities abound…<br />

Coursebook Page 75 of 139<br />

6


5/29/2012<br />

TAKE HOME POINTS<br />

References<br />

• Visual field defects common<br />

◦ Often do NOT correlate with ODD location<br />

• B – scan is standard of care<br />

◦ Consider prior to imaging studies<br />

• AF photography<br />

• OCT role TBD<br />

◦ May help in differentiating NFL defects in ODD versus<br />

glaucoma<br />

◦ Perhaps useful to monitor progression<br />

1. Grippo, T. Rogers, S. Optic Disc Drusen. Glaucoma Today. 19-24. Jan/Feb 2012.<br />

2. Antcliff, R. Spalton, D. Are Optic Disc Drusen Inherited Ophthalmology 106: 1278-1281. 1999.<br />

3. Floyd, M. Katz, B. Measurement of Scleral Canal Using Optical Coherence Tomography in patients with Optic<br />

Disc Drusen. Ophthalmology 139: 664-669. 2005.<br />

4. Miller, Newman. Pseudopapilledema associated with Optic Disc Drusen. Clinical Neuro-ophthalmology. 6 th<br />

edition, volume 1. 178-187. 2005.<br />

5. Auw-Haedrick, C. Stauback, F. Optic Disc Drusen. Survey of Ophthalmology. 47: 515-532. Nov/Dec 2002.<br />

6. Golnik, C. Congenital anomalies and acquired abnormalities of the optic nerve. Up to Date. 8/2011.<br />

7. Bienfang, D. Overview and <strong>Differential</strong> diagnosis of papilledema. Up to Date. 6/2010.<br />

8. Slotnik, S. Sherman, J. Buried Disc Drusen Have Hyporeflective Appearance on Spectral Domain Optical<br />

Coherence Tomography. Optometry and Vision Science 89:5. May 2012.<br />

9. Murthy, R. Storm, L. In-vivo high resolution imaging of optic nerve head drusen using spectral domain optical<br />

coherence tomography. BMC Medical Imaging 10:11. 2010.<br />

10. Wilkins, J. Pomeranz, H. Visual Manifestations of Visible and Buried Optic Disc Drusen. Journal of Neuroophthalmology<br />

24. Nov 2004.<br />

11. Katz, B. Pomeranz, H. Visual field Defects and Retinal Nerve Fiber Layer Defects in Eyes with Buried Optic<br />

Nerve Drusen. American Journal of Ophthalmology: 141: 248-253. 2006.<br />

12. Tatlipinar, S. Bozkurt, B. Polarimetric Nerve Fiber Analysis in Patients with Visible Optic Nerve Head Drusen.<br />

Journal of Neuro-ophthalmology: 21: 245-249. 2001.<br />

13. Ocakoglu, O. The investigation of Retinal Nerve Fiber layer thickness in eye with optic nerve head drusen.<br />

Neuro-ophthalmology: 28: 205-214. 2004.<br />

14. Kawa, P. Nowomiejska, K. Glaucoma and Drusen of the Optic Nerve Head. Neuro-ophthalmology: 33: 77-83.<br />

2009.<br />

15. Thurtell, M. Biousse, V. Optic Nerve Head Drusen in Black Patients. Journal of Neuro-ophthalmology: 0: 1-4.<br />

2011.<br />

Coursebook Page 76 of 139<br />

7


5/29/2012<br />

Exam of H.T.<br />

Allison Coit<br />

Spokane VA Resident<br />

June 2012<br />

• Chief Concern:<br />

• Dozed off Friday afternoon and woke himself up when<br />

he jammed his thumb in his right eye<br />

• After incident noticed flash of light and snowstorm of<br />

black floaters<br />

• (‐)curtain over vision<br />

• No new flashes since initial incident<br />

• Immediately after poking eye, flushed eye out with<br />

water<br />

Exam…<br />

**S/p Cataract Extraction/PCIOL OD 2 weeks ago<br />

• DVA: w/o specs<br />

• OD: 20/400‐<br />

• OS: 20/50+<br />

• Pupils: PERRL, (‐)APD<br />

• EOMS: FULL<br />

• CT: No Tropia<br />

• CF: FTFC<br />

• Anterior Segment:<br />

• Lids: Clr OU<br />

• Conj:<br />

• OD: 2+ hyperemia<br />

• OS: Clr<br />

• Cornea: Clr OU<br />

• AC:<br />

• OD: 3+ pigment/cell<br />

• OS: D/Q<br />

• Iris: Flat OU<br />

• Lens:<br />

• OD: PCIOL – clear/centered<br />

• OS: 1+ NS, Tr PSC inferior to visual Axis<br />

Posterior Segment OD<br />

• Vitreous: Dense<br />

Hemorrhage<br />

• C/D: 0.15 , distinct margins<br />

• Macula: Flat<br />

• Posterior Pole:<br />

unremarkable<br />

• A/V: 2/3<br />

• Periphery: Flat<br />

Assessment/Plan<br />

Retina Evaluation<br />

• Assessment:<br />

• Vitreous Hemorrhage OD<br />

• Possible Retinal Detachment<br />

• B‐scan not working so unable to confirm<br />

• Rebound Inflammation OD<br />

• Plan:<br />

• Refer to Retina Specialist<br />

• Rx:<br />

• Scopolamine 1gtt qpm OD and qAM tomorrow OD<br />

• Prednisolone Acetate Q2hr OD only<br />

• DVA: w/o specs<br />

• OD: 5/100<br />

• Pupils: (+)APD<br />

• EOMS: FULL<br />

• CT: No Tropia<br />

• CF: FTFC<br />

• Anterior Segment (OD )<br />

• Lids: ClR<br />

• Conj: Clr<br />

• Cornea: Clr<br />

• AC: 2‐3+ cell<br />

• Iris: Flat<br />

• Lens: PCIOL – clear/centered<br />

• Gonio:<br />

• Small hypopyon<br />

Coursebook Page 77 of 139<br />

1


5/29/2012<br />

Retina Evaluation…<br />

• Posterior Segment ‐<br />

OD only<br />

• Vitreous Hemorrhage<br />

• Vitreous: 3+ vitritis, 3‐4+<br />

vitreous haze, clumps of<br />

vitreous cells and a “string<br />

of pearls”<br />

• Retina: break at 11 o’clock<br />

No Case of No Cataract<br />

Surgeries Years Rate per 1000 Surgeries<br />

Author Country Data Source Endophthalmitis<br />

West et al United States Medicare, US 1026 447,627 1994‐2001 2.15<br />

Taban et al United Kingdom Meta‐analysis >3,000,000 1963‐2003 1.28<br />

Kamalaraajah et al United Kingdom<br />

Estimations from<br />

databases &<br />

questionnaires ~230,000 1999‐2000 1.4<br />

Admin and clinical<br />

Li et al<br />

Australia<br />

databases 210 117,083 1980‐2000 1.79<br />

Admin and clinical<br />

databases 102 57,123 1995‐2000 1.79<br />

Ng et al<br />

Australia<br />

National cataract<br />

registry 112 118,151 1999‐2001 0.6<br />

Wejde et al<br />

Sweden<br />

National cataract<br />

registry 109 225,471 2002‐2004 0.48<br />

Lundstrom et al Sweden<br />

Krummenauer et al Germany Questionnaire 291 404,356 2000 0.72<br />

Moshirfar et al United States 14 20,013 2003‐2005 0.7<br />

Bascom Palmer 1984‐1989 0.7<br />

Bascom Palmer 1990‐1994 0.9<br />

Bascom Palmer 1995‐1999 0.6<br />

Miller et al<br />

Clear Corneal<br />

Incision 6 15, 920 2000‐2004 0.5<br />

other methods 1 0.2<br />

Risk Factors<br />

• Pre‐Operative<br />

• Blepharitis/Conjunctivitis<br />

• Lacrimal Duct Obstruction<br />

• Contact Lens Wear<br />

• Ocular prosthesis in fellow<br />

orbit<br />

• Male>Female<br />

• >85 years old (2 nd risk group<br />

was 20‐64 years)<br />

• Diabetes<br />

• Immunosuppression<br />

• Upper Respiratory Infection<br />

• Intraoperative<br />

• Capsular Rupture<br />

• Secondary IOL<br />

• Inadequate eyelid/conjunctival<br />

disinfection<br />

• Prolonged surgery (>60min)<br />

• Vitreous loss<br />

• Prolene haptic IOLs<br />

• Postoperative<br />

• Wound leak/dehiscence<br />

• Inadequate buried sutures<br />

• Suture removal<br />

• Presence of filtering bleb<br />

Decreased Vision<br />

(+)APD<br />

Loss of red reflex<br />

Corneal Infiltrate<br />

Wound abnormality<br />

Hypopyon<br />

Pain<br />

Corneal Edema<br />

Fibrinoid AC response<br />

Vitreous Inflam<br />

Retinitis<br />

Keratic precipitates<br />

• External Signs<br />

• Ciliary injection<br />

• Chemosis<br />

• Eyelid edema<br />

• Orbital Infection<br />

• Restriction of EOMs<br />

• Proptosis<br />

Delayed Clinical Signs/Symptoms<br />

• Capsular plaques (89%)<br />

• White plaque on posterior capsules<br />

• Fungal or bacterial<br />

• Keratic precipitates (81%)<br />

• Hypopyon (31%)<br />

• Small, do gonio<br />

• Low grade uveitis (may initially respond to steroids)<br />

• Granulomatous<br />

• Vitritis<br />

• Beaded fibrin strand in aqueous<br />

• White “string of pearls” infiltrate in vitreous or aqueous<br />

• fungal<br />

• No pain initially (27%)<br />

Coursebook Page 78 of 139<br />

2


5/29/2012<br />

• Immediate (withinin 2 days of surgery)<br />

Could be any organism!<br />

• Pseudomonas** Streptococcus**<br />

• Early (214 days after surgery)<br />

Could be any organism!<br />

Top Suspects:<br />

•Staphylococcus (coagulase negative) &<br />

•Staphylococcus aureus<br />

**most virulent<br />

<strong>Differential</strong> <strong>Diagnosis</strong><br />

• Delayed (>14 days after surgery)<br />

• Most common:<br />

• Staphylococcus<br />

• Propionibacterium acnes<br />

• Fungi<br />

• Ex: Candida, Aspergillus<br />

• Immediate<br />

• Toxic Anterior Segment Syndrome<br />

• Clinical Findings:<br />

• Fibrin formation<br />

• Corneal Edema<br />

• Anterior Chamber inflammation<br />

• Mid‐dilated and irregular pupil<br />

• Low IOP<br />

• Vs Endophthalmitis<br />

• Usually less prominent redness<br />

• Less pain<br />

• Less severe anterior chamber reaction<br />

• Little or no vitreous inflammation<br />

<strong>Differential</strong> <strong>Diagnosis</strong><br />

• Early (2 14 days)<br />

• Retained Lens Material<br />

• Increased inflammation with time<br />

• Amount of retained lens + amount of time in eye<br />

• Perform gonio<br />

<strong>Differential</strong> <strong>Diagnosis</strong><br />

• Early<br />

• Proliferative Diabetic Retinopathy<br />

• PDR greater disturbance of blood aqueous barrier<br />

• History of Uveitis<br />

• Greatest risk of excessive post‐op inflam and complications<br />

when uveitis not under control<br />

• Most specialists require 6 months of inflamm control<br />

• Increased risk: HLA‐B27 uveities, sarcoidosis, granulomatous<br />

uveitis, children<br />

Coursebook Page 79 of 139<br />

3


5/29/2012<br />

Treatment<br />

• Intravitreal<br />

• Ceftazidime (gram ‐, including P. aeruginosa and H. influenzae)<br />

• 2.25mg in 0.1ml<br />

• Vancomycin (gram +, including MRSA)<br />

• 1.0mg in 0.1mL<br />

• Subconjunctival<br />

• Vancomycin<br />

• 25mg in 0.5mL<br />

• Ceftazidime<br />

• 100mg in 0.5mL<br />

• Steroids<br />

Topical<br />

Vancomycin<br />

50mg in 1.0mL<br />

Ceftazidime<br />

100mg in 1.0mL<br />

• Oral prednisolone 1mg/kg po Qam x 3‐5 days<br />

• Intravitreal dexamethasone<br />

• Topical Pred Acetate 1% q1‐2 hours<br />

Vitrectomy<br />

Goal:<br />

Removing the infecting organisms and toxins<br />

Removing vitreous membranes<br />

Which could lead to retinal detachments<br />

Improve distribution of antibiotics<br />

Cons:<br />

Increase drug toxicity<br />

Endophthalmitis Vitrectomy<br />

Treatment Study (EVS)<br />

• 420 patients<br />

• Endophthalmitis within 6 weeks of cataract surgery<br />

or secondary IOL<br />

• Results<br />

• Systemic antibiotics made no difference in final visual<br />

acuity<br />

• VA of Hand Motion or better<br />

• Vitrectomy made no difference in outcome<br />

• VA of Light Perception only<br />

• Improved outcome with immediate vitrectomy<br />

Prophylaxis<br />

• 5% Povidone Iodine<br />

• Significantly decreases the risk<br />

• Effective against bacteria, fungi, virus, protozoa, and<br />

spores<br />

• Surgeons place 1gtt of Betadine in eye at surgery<br />

• Pre‐op Antibiotics<br />

• Limit pre‐op drops to 1‐3 days to decrease risk of antibiotic<br />

resistance<br />

• Post‐op Subconj Antibiotics<br />

• Inconclusive<br />

• Not always effective because of sub‐therapeutic<br />

intraocular concentration<br />

Special Thanks to:<br />

Thomas Riley, OD, FAAO<br />

References<br />

1. Doshi, Rishi R., J. Fernando Arevalo, Harry W. Flynn, and Emmett T. Cunningham, Jr. "Evaluating<br />

Exaggerated, Prolonged, or Delayed Postoperative Intraocular Inflammation." American Journal of<br />

Ophthalmology 150 (2010): 295‐304. Print.<br />

2. Endophthalmitis Vitrectomy Treatment Group, comp. "Results of the Endophthalmitis Vitrectomy Study."<br />

Arch Ophthalmology 113 (1995): 1479‐496. Print.<br />

3. Hatch, Wendy V., Geta Cernat, David Wong, Robert Devenyi, and Chaim M. Bell. "Risk Factors for Acute<br />

Endophthalmitis after Cataract Surgery: A Population‐based Study." Ophthalmology 116.3 (2009): 425‐30.<br />

Print.<br />

4. Kresloff, Michael S., Alessandro A. Castellarin, and Marco A. Zarbin. "Endophthalmitis." Survey of<br />

Ophthalmitis 43.3 (1998): 193‐224. Print.<br />

5. Lalwani, Geeta A., Harry W. Flynn Jr, Ingrid U. Scott, Carolyn M. Quinn, Audina M. Berrocal, Janet L. Davis,<br />

Timothy G. Murray, William E. Smiddy, and Darlene Miller. "Acute‐Onset Endophthalmitis after Clear<br />

Corneal Cataract Surgery (1996–2005)Clinical Features, Causative Organisms, and Visual Acuity<br />

Outcomes." Ophthalmology 115.3 (2008): 473‐76. Print.<br />

6. Moshirfar, M., V. Feiz, A. Vitale, J. Wegelin, S. Basavanthappa, and D. Wolsey. "Endophthalmitis after<br />

Uncomplicated Cataract Surgery with the Use of Fourth‐Generation FluoroquinolonesA Retrospective<br />

Observational Case Series." Ophthalmology 114.4 (2007): 686‐91. Print.<br />

7. Scott, I., H. Flynnjr, W. Smiddy, J. Newton, and D. Miller. "Acute‐onset Endophthalmitis After Cataract<br />

Surgery (2000–2004): Incidence, Clinical Settings, and Visual Acuity Outcomes After Treatment." American<br />

Journal of Ophthalmology 139.6 (2005): 983‐87. Print.<br />

Coursebook Page 80 of 139<br />

4


5/29/2012<br />

Case History<br />

VALSALVA RETINOPATHY<br />

Kendra Kallemeyn, OD<br />

Roseburg, OR VAMC<br />

65yowm presents with CC of “black spot blocking<br />

the vision in right eye. “<br />

Onset – sudden, 5 days ago<br />

Activity during time of onset – was helping daughter<br />

move an entertainment center the night before and<br />

when he woke up in the middle of the night he could not<br />

see out of his right eye<br />

Change in vision does not appear to be worsening or<br />

improving since time of onset.<br />

No symptoms like this have been noted previously in<br />

either eye.<br />

Ocular History<br />

(-) prior ocular disease, injury or surgery<br />

LEE 4-5yrs ago at commercial practice<br />

Patient’s wife reports he was told to get his blood<br />

pressure checked, because “something is wrong with the<br />

blood vessels in the eye(s).”<br />

No follow-up appointment with PCP was made<br />

Medical History<br />

No prior healthcare with any VA system prior to<br />

today<br />

Medications<br />

Unknown blood pressure medication<br />

started by outside provider in ~2009<br />

patient reports medication is NOT controlling BP<br />

NKDA<br />

Baseline Exam 11/1/11<br />

Visual Acuities cc<br />

OD: CF w/EF PHNI<br />

OS: 20/40 PHNI<br />

Pupils: equal, round, reactive to light, (+)APD OD<br />

EOMs: full and smooth OU<br />

Confrontation Fields: full to finger counting OU<br />

Anterior Seg: unremarkable OU<br />

Tonometry by GAT: 16/16 @ 1:21pm<br />

BP recorded as 174/99 at check-in to ER<br />

Coursebook Page 81 of 139<br />

1


5/29/2012<br />

Baseline Exam Continued…<br />

OD<br />

Posterior Segment<br />

Lens: trace nuclear sclerosis OU<br />

Vitreous: clear OU<br />

C/D Ratio : 0.65/0.65 OD, 0.5/0.5 OS<br />

Vessels: arterial attenuation OU, A/V crossing changes OS<br />

Macula<br />

• OD: 5DDx5DD subretinal and intraretinal hemorrhage<br />

w/preretinal heme inferior<br />

• OS: flat, mild RPE changes, (-)heme/MA<br />

Periphery: intact 360 OU<br />

SUBRETINAL<br />

--green/gray<br />

INTRARETINAL<br />

--dark red<br />

PRERETINAL<br />

(Subhyaloid or sub-ILM)<br />

--boat shape or<br />

horizontal blood line<br />

OS<br />

Assessment/Plan<br />

--arterial attenuation with<br />

no retinal hemorrhages<br />

Assessment<br />

Subretinal hemorrhage OD<br />

Plan<br />

Refer for retinal consult; Portland VA Ophthalmology<br />

<strong>Differential</strong> <strong>Diagnosis</strong><br />

<br />

<br />

Primary <strong>Diagnosis</strong><br />

Valsalva retinopathy<br />

Secondary <strong>Diagnosis</strong><br />

Retinal Artery Macroaneurysm<br />

Terson’s Syndrome<br />

Trauma – Choroidal Rupture<br />

High Altitude Retinopathy<br />

Neovascular Macular Degeneration – CNV<br />

Retinopathy in Blood Disorders<br />

Purtscher Retinopathy<br />

Hypertensive retinopathy<br />

Diabetic retinopathy<br />

Choroidal Melanoma<br />

http://www.sightnation.com/eye-disorders/otherpage=3<br />

http://www.nature.com/eye/journal/v20/n9/fig_tab/6702068f6.html#figure-title<br />

Retinal Artery Macroaneurysm (hemorrhage)<br />

• Aneurysmal dilation of arteriole, most commonly at bifurcation or A/V crossing, along temporal arcades<br />

and is associated with multilayer retinal hemorrhage in 50% of cases.<br />

• Hard exudates may also be present due to chronic leakage<br />

• Most commonly seen with unilateral presentation in hypertensive, elderly women.<br />

•Preretinal and vitreous hemorrhage may block underlying lesion and/or make FA difficult which can<br />

result in misdiagnosis.<br />

Coursebook Page 82 of 139<br />

2


5/29/2012<br />

http://savesightcentre.com/diagnostic-testing.html<br />

http://www.sarawakeyecare.com/Atlasofophthalmology/posteriorsegment/posteriorsegmentpictur5tersonsyndrome.htm<br />

http://www.revoptom.com<br />

Terson’s Syndrome<br />

• Intraocular hemorrhage (typically bilateral) associated with acute intracranial hemorrhage<br />

• Most common cause – subarachnoid bleeding from aneurysm of the anterior communicating artery<br />

• Mechanism -- increased intracranial pressure at the time of an acute intracranial bleed may lead to<br />

acute obstruction of the retinal venous circulation which results in rupture of superficial retinal vessels<br />

• Patient typically presents to ER Physician with significant systemic signs/symptoms after suffering a<br />

spontaneous or trauma-induced subarachnoid hemorrhage<br />

Trauma: Choroidal Rupture<br />

• Involves the choroid, Bruch’s membrane, and RPE<br />

• Overlying subretinal hemorrhage may obscure view of fresh rupture<br />

• rupture will appear as a white, crescent shaped, vertical streak of exposed sclera<br />

http://www.nejm.org/doi/pdf/10.1056/NEJMicm0909506<br />

http://www.eyedefectsresearch.org/mac-degen.html<br />

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov.proxy.lib.pacificu.edu:2048/pmc/a<br />

rticles/PMC3040733/pdf/pone.0011532.pdftool=pmcentrez<br />

http://www.rustoneyeinstitute.com/index.cfm/PageID/3788<br />

High Altitude Retinopathy<br />

• Acquired retinopathy which typically occurs at elevations above 16,000ft<br />

• Delayed onset of retinal hemorrhages on descent from high altitudes is common<br />

• Triad of dilated retinal veins, retinal hemorrhages and optic disc edema<br />

• Part of a spectrum of conditions associated with high altitude/hypoxic conditions<br />

• Acute Mountain Sickness, High Altitude Cerebral Edema, High Altitude Pulmonary Edema<br />

Neovascular (Wet) Macular Degeneration: CNV<br />

• Non-exudative (dry) Macular Degeneration<br />

• drusen, RPE pigment changes, geographic atrophy<br />

• Exudative (wet) Macular Degeneration<br />

• Choroidal neovascularization (CNV)<br />

http://www.djo.harvard.edu<br />

www.redatlas.org<br />

http://www.retinamaculainstitute.com/ocular-education/ocular-trauma<br />

http://webeye.ophth.uiowa.edu<br />

http://legacy.revoptom.com/handbook/sect7e.htm<br />

Retinopathy in Blood Disorders<br />

• Sickle Cell Retinopathy, Anemia, Leukemia, etc<br />

• salmon patch intraretinal hemorrhages, black sunbursts (RPE hyperplasia), seafan<br />

neovascularization, vitreal hemorrhage, CWS, Roth spots<br />

Purtscher Retinopathy<br />

• Associated with head trauma, compressive chest injuries, long bone fracture, acute<br />

pancreatitis, retrobulbar anesthesia, or systemic disorders (ie. Lupus)<br />

• Typically presents bilaterally with presence of CWS, peri-papillary retinal<br />

whitening, dilated retinal venous system, and retinal hemorrhages<br />

Coursebook Page 83 of 139<br />

3


5/29/2012<br />

http://www.mrcophth.com/retinalvasculardisorders/proliferativediabetic.html<br />

http://www.nature.com/nrrheum/journal/v2/n8/fig_tab/ncprheum0268_F6.html<br />

Hypertensive Retinopathy<br />

• Arterial attenuation, vascular leakage leading to retinal edema and deposition<br />

of hard exudates, macular star, CWS, subretinal hemorrhages, ONH swelling<br />

http://www.rustoneyeinstitute.com/index.cfm/PageID/3796<br />

Diabetic Retinopathy<br />

• NPDR: multiple MA and dot/blot hemes, CWS, HE, IRMA, NVD, NVI, NVE<br />

• progressive: mildmoderatesevere<br />

• PDR<br />

http://www.jhu.edu/wctb/coms/general/about-mm/coms1a.htm<br />

http://www.sightnation.com/casephotos/choroidal-melanoma<br />

Initial Presentation<br />

2 weeks<br />

2 months<br />

Choroidal Melanoma<br />

http://www.kellogg.umich.edu/theeyeshaveit/non-trauma/choroidal-melanoma.html<br />

• Present with varying amounts of pigmentation or amelanotic<br />

• If the tumor breaks through Bruch’s membrane, intrinsic blood vessels and<br />

hemorrhages may also be visible<br />

Valsalva Retinopathy<br />

http://webeye.ophth.uiowa.edu/eyeforum/cases/67-Valsalva-Retinopathy-Vision-Loss-Asthma.htm<br />

• Classically presents as a sudden loss of central vision in a healthy individual that is<br />

caused by premacular hemorrhage secondary to Valsalva stress.<br />

• Valsalva maneuver (stress) is defined as “increasing intrathoracic or intraabdominal<br />

pressure against a closed glottis which slows venous return to the heart, decreases stroke<br />

volume and subsequently increases venous system pressure”<br />

Valsalva maneuver: pathophysiology<br />

Causes of Valsalva Stress<br />

2. Diminished<br />

cardiac filling<br />

lowers the arterial<br />

pressure, slows the<br />

pulse and leads to<br />

reflex tachycardia<br />

and peripheral<br />

vasoconstriction.<br />

3. Release of the<br />

strain causes<br />

sudden reduction<br />

of intrathoracic<br />

pressure, further<br />

lowering the<br />

blood pressure<br />

and increasing<br />

the cardiac<br />

pressure.<br />

4. Abrupt<br />

increase in blood<br />

pressure occurs as<br />

blood surges<br />

back to the heart<br />

which induces<br />

reflex<br />

tachycardia.<br />

1. Sudden<br />

increase in<br />

intrathoracic<br />

pressure<br />

decreases venous<br />

return to the heart.<br />

Valsalva<br />

Retinopathy<br />

5. As the sudden rise<br />

in intraocular venous<br />

pressure occurs,<br />

retinal capillaries<br />

spontaneously rupture<br />

which can lean to…<br />

Coursebook Page 84 of 139<br />

4


5/29/2012<br />

Valsalva retinopathy: Benefits of OCT<br />

Treatment vs Observation<br />

Valsalva retinopathy has a tendency to appear at<br />

the macula.<br />

Visual prognosis and treatment options depend on<br />

the size and anatomical level of the hemorrhage.<br />

Use of the SD-OCT can localize the hemorrhage as<br />

sub-ILM and/or subhyaloid.<br />

Researchers continue to<br />

dispute if the plane of the<br />

hemorrhage is truly sub-ILM,<br />

subhyaloid, or if the ILM and<br />

hyaloid membrane are in fact fused.<br />

Why Consider Treatment<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

Patient may have profound vision<br />

loss for up to 6mo if left untreated.<br />

Longstanding macular hemorrhages<br />

(even 10DD in area with bullous<br />

intraretinal hemorrhage overlying<br />

• OS: flat<br />

Periphery: attached 360 OU<br />

Macular OCT<br />

OD: large subretinal elevation with large intraretinal cyst<br />

OS: flat<br />

Coursebook Page 85 of 139<br />

5


5/29/2012<br />

Assessment/Plan:<br />

Assessment<br />

Subretinal hemorrhage OD – large, >10DD in area,<br />

prominently elevated<br />

• Given history of patient moving entertainment unit by himself this<br />

likely represents Valsalva retinopathy<br />

Plan<br />

Request patient be sent to Casey Eye Institute for FA and<br />

photos to evaluate for alternative underlying etiology.<br />

Counseled patient only course of action is observation.<br />

Monocular precautions.<br />

RTC 4mo for f/u.<br />

Follow-Up<br />

Attempt #1 (1/23/12)<br />

2mo f/u at Roseburg VAMC – cancelled by patient<br />

Attempt #2 (3/27/12)<br />

4mo f/u at Roseburg VAMC – wife reports they will not be<br />

able to make it to any f/u appointments<br />

*Note: Review of patient chart shows high no-show and<br />

cancel rate for lab work and PCP appointments as well.<br />

Chart notes or test results from Casey Eye Institute were not<br />

available.<br />

Valsalva Retinopathy vs Retinal Artery Macroaneurysm (RAM)<br />

http://savesightcentre.com/diagnostic-testing.html<br />

<br />

Dx: Valsalva Retinopathy<br />

based on case history<br />

OCT would typically show sub-ILM<br />

hemorrhage<br />

<br />

Dx: RAM<br />

hemorrhage present at multiple layers<br />

OCT shows subretinal and intraretinal<br />

elevation<br />

patient is >60yrs old and has h/o<br />

uncontrolled hypertension<br />

RAM “idiopathic, acquired dilation of<br />

a major retinal arteriole typically<br />

occurring at the first three bifurcations<br />

or an area of A/V crossing”<br />

Conclusions and Clinical Pearls<br />

References<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<strong>Diagnosis</strong> of Valsalva retinopathy or hemorrhage as a<br />

complication of RAM would not change the plan or outcome in this<br />

patient.<br />

Multi-layer retinal hemorrhages would not benefit from Nd:YAG<br />

membranotomy. Direct or indirect laser treatment for macroaneurysm is<br />

controversial.<br />

Remember to consider your patient’s occupation or recreational<br />

demands. Is binocular vision needed as a work requirement How<br />

is the vision in the other eye<br />

As always, patients need to be presented with all treatment<br />

options and educated on expected timelines for possible visual<br />

recovery.<br />

Al-Mujaini AS, Montana CC. Valsalva retinopathy in pregnancy: a case report. Journal of Medical Case Reports.<br />

2008. 2:101.<br />

De Maeyer K, et al. Sub-inner limiting membrane haemorrhage: causes and treatment with vitrectomy. British Journal<br />

of Ophthalmology. 2007. 91:869-872.<br />

Duane TD. Valsalva hemorrhagic retinopathy. Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc. 1972. 70: 298-313.<br />

Kaiser, Friedman. The Massachusetts Eye and Ear Infirmary Illustrated Manual of Ophthalmology. 2 nd edition. 2004.<br />

Kanski J. Clinical Ophthalmology, A Systemic Approach. 6 th edition, 2007.<br />

Khan M.T., et al. Nd:YAG laser treatment for Valsalva premacular hemorrhages: 6 month follow up. Alternative<br />

management options for preretinal premacular hemorrhages in Valsalva retinopathy. International Ophthalmology.<br />

2008. 28:325-327.<br />

Kwok AK, Lai TY, Chan NR. Epiretinal membrane formation with internal limiting membrane wrinkling after Nd:YAG<br />

lasaer membranotomy in Valsalva retinopathy. American Journal of Ophthalmology. Oct 2003. 136(4):763-766.<br />

Mumcuoglu T, Durukan A, et al. Outcomes of Nd:YAG Laser Treatment for Valsalva Retinopathy Due to Intense<br />

Military Exercise. Ophthalmology Surgery, Lasers and Imaging. Jan/Feb 2009. Vol 40:19-24.<br />

Sabella P, Bottoni, F, Staurenghi, G. Spectral-domain OCT evaluation of Nd:YAG laser treatment for Valsalva<br />

retinopathy. Graefe’s Arch Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology. 2010. 248:599-601.<br />

Shukla D, Naresh K, Kim R. Optical coherence tomography findings in Valsalva retinopathy. American Journal of<br />

Ophthalmology. July 2005. 140:134-136.<br />

Tatlipinar S, et al. Optical coherence tomography features of sub-internal limiting membrane hemorrhage and<br />

preretinal membrane in Valsalva retinopathy. Canadian Journal of Ophthalmology. 2007. 42:129-130.<br />

Coursebook Page 86 of 139<br />

6


5/29/2012<br />

Thank you!<br />

Roseburg VA Eye Care Team<br />

• Dr. Bryan Deck, OD<br />

• Dr. Dirk Dittemore, OD<br />

• Dr. Duva Appleman, MD<br />

Coursebook Page 87 of 139<br />

7


Objectives<br />

Perioperative Vision Loss from<br />

Non‐Ophthalmic Surgery<br />

Brett Richardson, O.D.<br />

Spokane VAMC<br />

509.434.7032<br />

• My goal for this presentation is for you to<br />

understand that<br />

– Non‐ophthalmic surgeries can result in<br />

Perioperative Vision Loss (POVL)<br />

– Altered vascular supply is the primary cause<br />

Objectives<br />

• I will be discussing<br />

– Common surgeries that result in Perioperative<br />

vision loss (POVL)<br />

• Cardiac<br />

• Spine<br />

– Most common types of POVL<br />

• Ischemic Optic Neuropathy<br />

• Retinal Vascular Occlusion<br />

• Cortical Blindness<br />

Case<br />

• 65 y.o. WM<br />

• POHx<br />

– Mild Hypertensive Retinopathy OU<br />

– RPE mottling OU<br />

• PMHx<br />

– Malignant Hypertension (as high as 267/158)<br />

– Hypercholesterolemia<br />

– Coronary Artery Disease<br />

– Myocardial Infarction with Angioplasty and stent 2007<br />

– Renal failure<br />

– Angioplasty and stent 2011 (2 weeks ago)<br />

Case<br />

• CC: “During angioplasty and stent surgery 2<br />

weeks ago, my blood pressure shot way up<br />

and my vision has been blurry and distorted<br />

ever since.”<br />

Case<br />

• VA<br />

– od: 20/80 ‐>> ph70, very slow<br />

– os: 20/150 ‐>> phni, very slow<br />

• BCVA<br />

– od: 20/40<br />

– os: 20/100<br />

• PERRLA (‐) APD<br />

• Tonometry<br />

– od: 13<br />

– os: 14<br />

Coursebook Page 88 of 139


Case<br />

• Ant Seg: Unremarkable<br />

• Fundus<br />

– Nerve ou: 0.4rd, (‐) pallor<br />

– Macula: Mild Mottling OS>OD<br />

– Vasculature ou: 2/3, mild nicking<br />

– Posterior Pole: unremarkable ou<br />

– Periphery: flat ou<br />

Case<br />

• Additional Testing<br />

– OCT: macular<br />

• od: 176microns centrally, normal contour<br />

• os: 176microns centrally, normal contour<br />

– BP: 120/72<br />

– Visual Field<br />

Case ‐ Visual Fields #1<br />

Case ‐ CT Scan<br />

• Unremarkable<br />

Homonymous Macular Quadronopsia<br />

Case – Follow Up<br />

Case –Visual Fields #2<br />

• 4 Months later<br />

– VA<br />

• od: 20/60+ phni<br />

• os: 20/100 phni<br />

– Fundus: No significant changes<br />

• (‐) Optic Nerve Pallor<br />

– Visual Field<br />

Generalized Depression OU!!<br />

Coursebook Page 89 of 139


Case – Follow Up<br />

Case –Visual Fields #3<br />

• 8 months later<br />

– VA<br />

• od:20/30<br />

• os:20/100<br />

– Fundus: No Significant changes<br />

– Optic Nerve: (‐) pallor ou<br />

– Visual Field:<br />

Imaging<br />

Fundus Photos<br />

• MRI<br />

– Chronic small right occipital infarct<br />

– Chronic small vessel ischemic changes and chronic<br />

lacunar infarcts<br />

• MRA<br />

– Unremarkable<br />

<strong>Diagnosis</strong><br />

• Angioplasty with stent surgery causing<br />

occipital lobe infarction resulting in<br />

homonymous macular quadranopsia leading<br />

to cortical blindness secondary to cerebral<br />

ischemia<br />

• CARDIAC SURGERY CORTICAL BLINDNESS<br />

Study<br />

• 10 Year study from 1996‐2005 by Nationwide<br />

Inpatient Sample (NIS).<br />

• 74 million patients<br />

– 5.7 million relevant surgical patients<br />

• 8 most common surgeries in U.S.<br />

• Monitoring for Perioperative visual loss<br />

– Ischemic Optic Neuropathy (ION)<br />

– Retinal Vascular Occlusion (RVO)<br />

– Cortical Blindness (CB)<br />

Coursebook Page 90 of 139


Study<br />

• Incidence of POVL<br />

– Cardiac Surgery: 8.64/10,000<br />

– Spine Surgery: 3.09/10,000<br />

– Appendectomy: 0.12/10,000<br />

– Total: 2.35/10,000 (all 8 surgery types)<br />

• POVL in Cardiac Surgery<br />

– RVO 77%<br />

– ION 16%<br />

– CB 8%<br />

• POVL in Spine Surgery<br />

– CB 49%<br />

– ION 28%<br />

– RVO 23%<br />

Study<br />

• Findings<br />

– Highest rate of POVL is found in cardiac and spine<br />

surgeries<br />

– Prevalence: Males vs. Females 2:1<br />

– ION highest in patients 50‐64 y/o<br />

– RVO highest in patients > 65 y/o<br />

– CB highest in patients < 18 y/o<br />

– Highest prevalence in patients < 18 y/o (4.37/10,000)<br />

– POVL remains unpredictable and is not related to any<br />

particular hospital or degree of surgical experience<br />

Literature Review Reveals:<br />

• Ischemic Optic Neuropathy<br />

– 3 Forms<br />

• Perioperative, Arteritic, Non‐arteritic,<br />

– Hypotension ION<br />

– Anemia ION<br />

• > 1L (average 5L)<br />

– Hypothermia ION<br />

• blood viscosity<br />

• 1 o Cdecrease = 6‐7% decrease in cerebral blood flow<br />

– Ocular Hypertension (prone position)<br />

– Surgical Time (> 6 hours)<br />

Literature Review Reveals:<br />

• Central Retinal Artery Occlusion (CRAO)<br />

– Spine Surgeries (933 cases)<br />

• Declined Prone position venous stasis in capillary<br />

beds<br />

– 70% secondary to ocular trauma<br />

• Ocular compression from head rest can raise IOP to<br />

sufficient level to cause ischemia<br />

Literature Review Reveals:<br />

• Cortical Blindness<br />

– Destruction or denervation of 1 o Visual Cortex<br />

(Occipital Lobe) or Optic Radiations<br />

– Highest incidence in cardiac surgery (CABG)<br />

– Results from embolism, stroke<br />

– Risk Factors<br />

• HTN, DM, Renal insufficiency, Smoking, PVD, COPD<br />

Summary<br />

• Perioperative Vision Loss Likely to occur:<br />

– Cardiac Surgery > Spine Surgery > all others<br />

– ION > CRAO > Cortical Blindness<br />

– High Risk patients<br />

• DM, Smoking, HTN, Vascular disease<br />

– High Risk Intraoperative Complications<br />

• Blood loss > 5L<br />

• Hypotension < 90 mmHg<br />

• Long Operating Times (> 6 hours)<br />

Coursebook Page 91 of 139


Coursebook Page 92 of 139


5/31/2012<br />

Diabetic Teleretinal Imaging<br />

Program:<br />

An Assessment of the Diabetic Teleretinal Imaging Program (TRIP) at<br />

the Portland Veterans Affairs Medical Center (PVAMC) - A Retrospective Study<br />

Diabetes Statistics<br />

• 24 million people in the US have DM<br />

• 78% have retinopathy if DM >15yrs<br />

Keely L. Hoban, O.D.<br />

Grace L. Tsan, O.D.<br />

Portland VA Medical Center<br />

June 4, 2012<br />

• 28.5 % of people with diabetes ages >40 years<br />

have diabetic retinopathy<br />

Burden of Diabetic Eye Disease<br />

• #1 cause of blindness in working‐aged adults<br />

in the US<br />

What does this mean for<br />

optometry<br />

Health<br />

Care<br />

System<br />

Burden<br />

Eye Care<br />

Providers<br />

Patients<br />

PVAMC Research Team<br />

• Weon Jun, O.D., FAAO<br />

• Keely L. Hoban, O.D.<br />

• Steve Mansberger, M.D., MPH<br />

• Amy L. Pedersen, O.D.<br />

• Kevin J. Riedel, O.D.<br />

• Grace L. Tsan, O.D.<br />

Objectives<br />

• Advantages and disadvantages of Diabetic Teleretinal Imaging<br />

Program (TRIP).<br />

• Types of clinical settings that may benefit from TRIP.<br />

• Effectiveness of TRIP at the PVAMC.<br />

• Identify program improvements for TRIP at the PVAMC<br />

Coursebook Page 93 of 139<br />

1


5/31/2012<br />

What is Telemedicine<br />

Store‐and‐Forward Telehealth<br />

http://www.telehealth.va.gov/<br />

Annual vs. Biennially<br />

DFE<br />

TRIPDFE<br />

Teledermatology Teleretinal Imaging Teleradiology<br />

How does TRIP work<br />

Four Non‐Mydriatic Images<br />

Cavallerano AA, Conlin PR. Teleimaging to screen for diabetic retinopathy in the Veterans Health Administration. J Diabetes Sci Technol 2(1): 33-9, 2008.<br />

Referral Guidelines for<br />

Diabetic Eye Exam<br />

Who may benefit from TRIP<br />

• Target Patients:<br />

– DM patients with low risk for retinopathy<br />

• i.e. Newly diagnosed DM patients, patients w/ well controlled A1c<br />

– DM patients with diabetic retinopathy that have been lost to follow‐up<br />

• Other Uses:<br />

– Identify co‐morbid eye conditions<br />

• Providers:<br />

– Hospitals<br />

– Academic Institutions<br />

– Group Practice Settings<br />

Cavallerano AA, Conlin PR. Teleimaging to screen for diabetic retinopathy in the Veterans Health Administration. J Diabetes Sci Technol 2(1): 33-9, 2008.<br />

Coursebook Page 94 of 139<br />

2


5/31/2012<br />

Goals for TRIP<br />

CASE #1<br />

• Increase compliance with diabetic eye exams<br />

• Improve patient education on importance of diabetic<br />

eye exam<br />

• Early intervention to treat and manage diabetic<br />

retinopathy<br />

Retrospective Chart Review<br />

• Inclusion Criteria:<br />

– Reviewed CPRS medical records of 200 patients from 1757<br />

diagnosed diabetic patients<br />

– Teleretinal imaging performed between<br />

January 1, 2010 and January 1, 2011<br />

• Exclusion Criteria<br />

PVAMC TRIP Locations<br />

Data<br />

Vancouver<br />

• Quality image:<br />

90% adequate<br />

• Male: 97%<br />

• Average age: 64.7 yrs (std dev 10.2)<br />

• Race:<br />

91% Caucasian<br />

• Avg Height/Weight: 70 inches/230 lbs<br />

• Avg BMI: 33.8 kg/m 2 (obesity >30)<br />

• Avg lab glucose:<br />

155 mg/dL<br />

• Avg HbA1c: 7.3%<br />

• Average duration of DM: 9 yrs<br />

Coursebook Page 95 of 139<br />

3


5/31/2012<br />

Co‐morbid Conditions<br />

• Fasting Cholesterol: 166 (normal


5/31/2012<br />

Efficiency of TRIP at PVAMC<br />

Efficiency of TRIP at PVAMC<br />

• Reader<br />

(Optometrist)<br />

Schedule<br />

appointment<br />

(80%)<br />

•Eye Clinic<br />

Redundancy<br />

11%<br />

6 months<br />

Duplicate Recall<br />

37%<br />

1 year<br />

Refer to eye<br />

clinic (99%)<br />

•Imager<br />

(at PCP dept)<br />

Dilated eye<br />

exam<br />

Eye<br />

Exam<br />

Teleretinal<br />

Imaging<br />

Teleretinal<br />

Recall<br />

TRIP Research Trends<br />

Good referral into eye clinic from readers<br />

Low redundancy by imagers<br />

Majority of patients had no DR<br />

Good compliance for referrals from imagers<br />

• High teleretinal imaging recall within one year<br />

of imaging<br />

Suggested Program Improvements<br />

to TRIP<br />

• Future recall for teleretinal imaging should be based<br />

on reader’s recommendation.<br />

• Increase awareness of all eye care providers to check<br />

future scheduled eye clinic appointments to reduce<br />

duplicated eye clinic and TRIP appointments<br />

Comparison to other VA TRIP<br />

Comparison to Non‐VA Populations<br />

Mansberger SL, Gleitsmann K, Gardine S, Sheppler C, Demirel S, Becker TM. The Comparative Effectiveness of Telemedicine for Providing Diabetic<br />

Retinopathy Screening Exams: A Randomized Controlled Trial<br />

Coursebook Page 97 of 139<br />

5


5/31/2012<br />

Improved Compliance with TRIP<br />

Sensitivity and Specificity of TRIP<br />

Mansberger SL, Gleitsmann K, Gardine S, Sheppler C, Demirel S, Becker TM. The Comparative Effectiveness of Telemedicine for Providing Diabetic<br />

Retinopathy Screening Exams: A Randomized Controlled Trial<br />

Benefits of TRIP<br />

Case #4<br />

Increased referrals for comprehensive eye exams<br />

Improved patient awareness and compliance<br />

Initiated timely treatment<br />

TRIP overcomes barriers for annual eye exams<br />

34‐64% of patients with DM in private and public sectors have<br />

annual eye exams, VA excels in this area<br />

Treatment is 90% effective in preventing severe vision loss<br />

Patient Satisfaction<br />

• Universally Positive<br />

• Efficient<br />

• Less time sensitive<br />

• More convenient for pt to be undilated<br />

• Pt Ed, improved understanding/awareness<br />

• Comfortable<br />

• Improved Compliance!!<br />

Economic Benefits<br />

• DM vision loss = $132 billion<br />

• Detecting proliferative diabetic retinopathy<br />

• Averting cases of severe vision loss<br />

• More time efficient<br />

• Improves adherence<br />

• TRIP may help utilize eye doctors time more<br />

effectively<br />

Cavallerano AA, Conlin PR. Teleimaging to screen for diabetic retinopathy in the Veterans Health Administration. J Diabetes Sci Technol 2(1): 33-9, 2008.<br />

Cavallerano AA, Conlin PR. Teleimaging to screen for diabetic retinopathy in the Veterans Health Administration. J Diabetes Sci Technol 2(1): 33-9, 2008.<br />

Coursebook Page 98 of 139<br />

6


5/31/2012<br />

Practical Implications: How to Bill<br />

Reimbursement<br />

PCP Site<br />

Specialist<br />

Review<br />

Diabetic<br />

Screening<br />

Encounter<br />

• Medicare<br />

– CPT 92227: remote imaging for detection of<br />

retinal disease<br />

– CPT 92228: remote imaging for monitoring and<br />

management of active retinal disease<br />

• Private and commercial carriers<br />

– CPT 92250/S0625<br />

Summary<br />

REFERENCES<br />

• TRIP fulfills the goals of screening low risk diabetic<br />

patients<br />

• Occasionally will miss some findings, or findings may<br />

be worse or improved as it is a “static image”<br />

• Helps patients to maintain quality of life and<br />

independence<br />

1. Huang ES, Basu A, O'Grady M, Capretta JC. Projecting the future diabetes population size and related costs for<br />

the U.S. Diabetes Care 32(12):2225‐2229, 2009.<br />

2. Diabetic Retinopathy. Preferred Practice Patterns. San Francisco: American Academy of Ophthalmology, 2008.<br />

3. Klein R, Klein BE, Moss SE, Davis MD, DeMets DL. The Wisconsin epidemiologic study of diabetic retinopathy. III.<br />

Prevalence and risk of diabetic retinopathy when age at diagnosis is 30 or more years. Arch Ophthalmol<br />

102(4):527‐532, 1984.<br />

4. Ferris FL, 3rd, Davis MD, Aiello LM. Treatment of diabetic retinopathy. N Engl J Med 341(9):667‐678, 1999.<br />

5. Garg S, Davis R. Diabetic retinopathy screening update. Clinical Diabetes: A publication of the American<br />

Diabetes Association 27:140‐145, 2009.<br />

6. Conlin PR, Fisch BM, Orcutt JC, Hetrick BJ, Darkins AW. Framework for a national teleretinal imaging program to<br />

screen for diabetic retinopathy in Veterans Health Administration patients. J Rehabil Res Dev 43(6): 741‐8, 2006.<br />

7. Cavallerano AA, Conlin PR. Teleimaging to screen for diabetic retinopathy in the Veterans Health Administration.<br />

J Diabetes Sci Technol 2(1): 33‐9, 2008.<br />

8. Lin DY, Blumenkranz MS, Brothers RJ, Grosvenor DM. The sensitivity and specificity of single‐field nonmydriatic<br />

monochromatic digital fundus photography with remote image interpretation for diabetic retinopathy<br />

screening: a comparison with ophthalmoscopy and standardized mydriatic color photography. Am J Ophthalmol<br />

134(2):204‐213, 2002.<br />

9. Farley TF, Mandava N, Prall FR, Carsky C. Accuracy of primary care clinician in screening for diabetic retinopathy<br />

using single‐image retinal photography. Ann Fam Med 6(5): 428‐34, 2008.<br />

10. Mansberger SL, Gleitsmann K, Gardine S, Sheppler C, Demirel S, Becker TM. The Comparative Effectiveness of<br />

Telemedicine for Providing Diabetic Retinopathy Screening Exams: A Randomized Controlled Trial<br />

THANK YOU!<br />

Portland VA Medical Center<br />

&<br />

<strong>Pacific</strong> <strong>University</strong> College of Optometry<br />

Coursebook Page 99 of 139<br />

7


5/29/2012<br />

Radioiodine Therapy and<br />

Graves’ Ophthalmopathy<br />

ZACHARY OSWALD, O.D.<br />

RESIDENT AT<br />

WALLA WALLA VA MEDICAL CENTER &<br />

PACIFIC CATARACT AND LASER INSTITUTE –<br />

KENNEWICK<br />

MAY 29, 2012<br />

Disclosure<br />

• Zachary Oswald, O.D., developed this course<br />

material and information independently without any<br />

relevant financial interests or influence of<br />

commercial interest.<br />

• Consent was given by the patient to present the<br />

photographs and personal information included in<br />

this course.<br />

Learning Objective<br />

Course Outline<br />

• By the end of this presentation, attendees will be able<br />

to:<br />

◦ 1. Understand, evaluate, and treat Graves’ Ophthalmopathy<br />

with more confidence.<br />

◦ 2. Recognize that using radioiodine therapy to treat<br />

hyperthyroidism can cause the development or worsening<br />

Graves’ Ophthalmopathy.<br />

◦ 3. Better understand the process of co-management with the<br />

other members of a patient’s health care provider team.<br />

• Case Presentation<br />

• Radioiodine in the treatment of hyperthyroidism<br />

• Graves’ Ophthalmopathy Overview<br />

• Possible Treatments of Graves’ Ophthalmopathy<br />

• Explore contraindications and possible side effects of<br />

oral prednisone.<br />

• Co-management Tips<br />

11/18/09 1 st Visit at WWVAMC<br />

11/18/09 1 st Visit at WWVAMC<br />

• 75 yowm<br />

• Comprehensive Exam<br />

• Personal Ocular History<br />

◦ Followed as glaucoma suspect due to larger C/D ratios for 35<br />

years, has never been prescribed glaucoma medication.<br />

◦ 2007 Cataract Extraction at PCLI - Lewiston: phaco with pc iol<br />

both eyes.<br />

◦ Last eye exam was in 2007 in Lewiston, ID.<br />

◦ Was told he had some signs of macular degeneration at last eye<br />

exam.<br />

◦ Wears Bifocals<br />

• Problem List:<br />

◦ Coronary Artery Disease<br />

◦ Congestive Heart Failure<br />

◦ Pulmonary Hypertension<br />

◦ Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease<br />

◦ Dependence on supplemental oxygen<br />

◦ Gout<br />

◦ Dermatitis<br />

◦ Tinnitus<br />

◦ Sensorineural hearing loss<br />

◦ MI 12/21/91, stopped smoking then<br />

Coursebook Page 100 of 139<br />

1


5/29/2012<br />

11/18/09 1 st Visit at WWVAMC<br />

11/18/09 1 st Visit at WWVAMC<br />

• Medications:<br />

◦ Bosentan 125mg bid<br />

◦ Calcium Carbonate 650mg tab qd<br />

◦ Citalopram 20mg ½ tab qd<br />

◦ Clopidogrel Bisulfate 75mg tab qd<br />

◦ Colchicine 0.6mg tab qd<br />

◦ Digoxin 0.125mg tab qd<br />

◦ Flunisolide inhaler bid<br />

◦ Furosemide 40mg tab bid<br />

◦ Hydrocodone 5 / Acetaminopthen 500mg tid prn<br />

◦ Levothyroxine 0.175mg tab qd<br />

• Medications Continued<br />

◦ Magnesium Oxide 400mg tab qd<br />

◦ Potassium Chloride 10meq 2 tab bid<br />

◦ Ranitidine HCL 150mg tab bid<br />

◦ Sildenafil Citrate 50mg ½ tab tid<br />

◦ Simvastatin 10mg tab qhs<br />

◦ Sprionolactone 2 tab qAM, 1 tab afternoon<br />

◦ Tiotropium 1 tab in inhaler qd<br />

◦ Warfarin 5mg tab qd<br />

11/18/09 1 st Visit at WWVAMC<br />

11/18/09 A & P<br />

• +1.00-2.25 x 090 20/25<br />

• +1.00-2.25 x 090 20/20-2<br />

• Add: 2.50 20/20<br />

• Cover Test Distance 4^ exophoria<br />

• ASSESSMENT:<br />

◦ 1) Glaucoma Suspect due to larger C/D ratios (RE 0.55/0.55, LE 0.5/0.5). IOP<br />

18mmHg RE, LE today.<br />

◦ 2) Macular pigment changes BE<br />

◦ 3) Pseudophakia BE with trace PCO<br />

◦ 4) Hyperopia, Astigmatism, Presbyopia BE<br />

• PLAN:<br />

◦ 1&2) Fundus photos taken today. Monitor pt. in one year with a comprehensive<br />

exam watch for changes in ONH, pressure check, and macular changes.<br />

◦ 3) Monitor in 1 year at comprehensive exam.<br />

◦ 4) No glasses ordered today. Pt. satisfied with vision and condition of current<br />

glasses.<br />

• Return to clinic in 1 year for comprehensive examination c FDT to monitor<br />

macular pigment changes and ONH cupping.<br />

01/20/11 Fee Basis Exam at Private Office<br />

06/27/11 WWVAMC – Age 76<br />

• +1.00-1.75 x 089 20/40<br />

• +1.50-2.00 x 086 20/30-<br />

• Add: 2.50<br />

• BE 1-2+ PCO encroaching centrally<br />

• YAG performed in March 2011 at PCLI – Lewiston.<br />

• Binocular Diplopia reported as starting in February<br />

2011.<br />

• Veteran has been working with private doctor in<br />

Lewiston. Last appointment with private doctor<br />

about a week ago.<br />

• Unsure what is causing diplopia.<br />

• Has glasses with prism that help, but eyes still feel<br />

like they are not working together.<br />

• Would like to start coming to VA again because it<br />

will be more cost effective.<br />

Coursebook Page 101 of 139<br />

2


5/29/2012<br />

06/27/11 WWVAMC<br />

06/27/11 WWVAMC<br />

◦ Problem List same as initial visit.<br />

◦ Medication additions since initial visit in 2009:<br />

Albuterol 2 puffs qid prn<br />

Bacitracin ung apply to affected area tid prn (dermatitis)<br />

Carboxymethylcellulose 0.5% qid BE prn<br />

Loratadine 10mg qd<br />

Losartan Potassium 50mg ½ tab qd<br />

Mometasone Furoate 1-2 sprays qd<br />

Mupirocin 2% ung affected areas bid (dermatitis)<br />

Ocular Lubricant Pres Free ung qhs BE<br />

Nitrofurantoin 100mg cap bid<br />

◦ Medications no longer taking since initial visit 2009:<br />

Colchicine<br />

Flunisolide<br />

Simvastatin<br />

Spironolactone<br />

• Hab Rx from Fee Basis Dr.<br />

◦ +1.25-2.00*088 3-4^BD 20/40+2<br />

◦ +1.25-2.50*087 3^BU 20/50+2<br />

◦ Base Curve<br />

RE 6.2<br />

LE 5.8<br />

• EOMs<br />

◦ Sup. right gaze, right eye appears underacting.<br />

◦ Inf. left gaze, left eye appears underacting.<br />

Which muscles are affected<br />

Actions of extraocular muscles<br />

LR<br />

SR<br />

IO<br />

MR<br />

IO<br />

MR<br />

SR<br />

LR<br />

Muscle Primary Action Secondary Tertiary<br />

Superior Rectus Elevation Intorsion Adduction<br />

Inferior Rectus Depression Extorsion Adduction<br />

Medial Rectus Adduction<br />

Inferior Oblique Excyclotorsion Elevation Abduction<br />

Superior Oblique Incyclotorsion Depression Abduction<br />

Lateral Rectus Abduction<br />

IR<br />

SO<br />

SO<br />

IR<br />

Right Eye<br />

Left Eye<br />

06/27/11 WWVAMC<br />

• Cover Test c older Rx (without prism):<br />

◦ Dist: 7^BD RE neutralizes vert movement, residual 2^ BO<br />

◦ Near: 7^BD RE, 8^ BI<br />

• Cover Test c habitual Rx (prism):<br />

◦ Dist: ortho vert and horiz<br />

◦ Near: ortho vert and horiz<br />

06/27/11 WWVAMC<br />

• Refraction:<br />

◦ +0.75-1.50*090 3^BD 20/25+1<br />

◦ +1.75-2.50*081 2^BU 20/25-2 BE:20/25-2<br />

◦ ADD: 2.50 20/25-<br />

• Binocular Testing:<br />

◦ Distance<br />

Horiz Phoria: 5^ BO<br />

Vergences: BI: x/-2/-5, BO: x/20/9<br />

Vert Phoria: 7^ BU LE<br />

Vergences (with 3^BO otherwise no fusion):<br />

LE BU 9/5, BD -2/NA<br />

◦ Near:<br />

Horiz: 10^ BI<br />

Vert 6^ BU LE<br />

Coursebook Page 102 of 139<br />

3


5/29/2012<br />

06/27/11 WWVAMC<br />

• Trial Framed the refraction:<br />

◦ +0.75-1.50*090 3^BD 20/25+1<br />

◦ +1.75-2.50*081 2^BU 20/25-2 BE:20/25-2<br />

◦ ADD: 2.50 20/25-<br />

• Patient reports the letters feel like they are trying to<br />

pull apart, but 5^ BU LE was preferred to 4^ BU or<br />

6^BU. No prism preferred horizontally.<br />

06/27/11 WWVAMC<br />

• Assessment:<br />

◦ 1. Right hypertropia causing diplopia – several muscles may be<br />

involved causing prism combinations to not totally correct the<br />

diplopia.<br />

◦ 2. Dry Eye Syndrome – causing some fluctuation of vision.<br />

◦ 3. Dry AMD BE – at most is minimally affecting vision.<br />

◦ 4. Glaucoma suspect secondary to larger c/d ratios (0.45/0.45 BE)<br />

pressures up from before (21/19), sloping discs.<br />

◦ 5. Bilateral pseudophakia s/p YAG BE<br />

• Plan:<br />

◦ 1. Ordered new bifocals.<br />

◦ 2. Encouraged to continue artificial tears 4x day and ointment at<br />

night.<br />

◦ 3-5. Monitor in one year with full exam.<br />

09/09/11 WWVAMC – Age 77<br />

09/09/11 WWVAMC<br />

• Vet reports that he received his new spectacles about<br />

2 weeks ago. They function better than previous<br />

spectacles, but he reports continued diplopia with<br />

and without them. Sometimes in the afternoon he<br />

sees singly. Right eye reported as much blurrier than<br />

the left with new spectacles.<br />

• External Exam:<br />

◦ Patient uses oxygen by nasal cannula tank with tank set to a 5<br />

or 6 and his lips have a blue hue (vet has pulmonary<br />

hypertension). Right eye possibly proptotic.<br />

• Visual Acuities<br />

• Current Spec Rx:<br />

◦ +1.25-1.25*092 3^BD 20/50 PH: 20/40<br />

◦ +1.75-2.50*082 2^BU 20/25+1<br />

◦ Add:2.25<br />

• Refraction:<br />

◦ RE: +0.75-2.00*092 20/25-2<br />

09/09/11 WWVAMC<br />

09/09/11 WWVAMC<br />

• EOMs:<br />

◦ Restricted RE sup/temp, LE inf/temp, Possible restriction LE<br />

sup/temp as well. (+) forced duction test.<br />

• Pupils: PERRL (-) APD 5-3, 2+ reaction light.<br />

• Cover Test over new specs:<br />

◦ Distance: 3^BD RE neutralizes vertical movement.<br />

◦ Near: 3^BD RE neutralizes vertical movement. 6^exo after<br />

vertical prism correction.<br />

• Red Cap Test: = saturation BE<br />

• Amsler Grid: BE (-) metamorphopsia, (-) scotomas<br />

• Exophthalmometry: 22/21 @ 110 (avg is 15-17)<br />

• SLE:<br />

• Lids, Lashes, Adnexa: BE: edematous upper lids, 2+<br />

dermatochalasis, 2+ MG inspissation, 1+ scalloped<br />

lid margins, 1+ debris along lashes.<br />

• Cornea: BE: Tr-1+ arcus 360*, 1+ diffuse SPK cent to<br />

inf.<br />

Coursebook Page 103 of 139<br />

4


5/29/2012<br />

Suspect Graves’ Ophthalmopathy<br />

• Pertinent medical history:<br />

◦ Veteran has a history of hyperthyroidism that was treated with<br />

radioiodine ablation.<br />

◦ Veteran is currently taking one 0.175mg tablet of levothyroxine<br />

once a day for thyroid.<br />

• Labs<br />

◦ 05/05/08: Thyroid Stimulating Hormone (TSH) 0.85 (o.3-<br />

6.0)<br />

◦ 03/25/09: Free T-4: 1.7 (0.6-2.0)<br />

TSH: 3.76 (0.3-6.0)<br />

◦ 03/18/10: TSH: 2.10 (0.3-6.0)<br />

◦ 08/17/11: TSH: 1.64 (0.3-6.0)<br />

09/09/11 WWVAMC<br />

• Assessment:<br />

◦ 1. Binocular diplopia with right eye hypertropia.<br />

◦ 2. Bilateral dry eye syndrome.<br />

• Plan:<br />

◦ 1. Ordered CT scan of both eyes from orbit to chiasm without<br />

contrast enhancement to review in clinic to rule out Graves, Thyroid,<br />

or compressive sources. Discussed diplopia as possibly related to<br />

thyroid problems and possible treatment options. Dispensed and<br />

applied 3^ BD Fresnel prism on the right lens which allowed single<br />

vision today. Dispensed patch to use as needed to prevent diplopia.<br />

Will call patient following review of CT results to schedule follow up<br />

appointment.<br />

◦ 2. Patient education. Encouraged patient to continue artificial tears 4<br />

times a day and lubricating ointment once at night both eyes.<br />

Monitor.<br />

What do you notice<br />

CT Results<br />

09/09/2011<br />

• Findings:<br />

◦ “The patient has rather marked enlargement identified of the right<br />

superior rectus muscle and the left inferior rectus muscle. There is a<br />

lesser degree of enlargement of the right inferior rectus muscle and<br />

the left superior rectus muscle. There is some stranding identified<br />

surrounding the right superior rectus and left inferior rectus muscle.<br />

This appears to infiltrate the whole muscle body itself with regards to<br />

the right superior and left inferior rectus muscles. The remainder<br />

appear to be infiltrating the mid body of the muscle itself.<br />

◦ Optic nerves appear to be grossly normal. The remainder of the<br />

extraocular muscles are normal.<br />

◦ There is is diffuse cerebral atrophy noted. Some mild mucosal<br />

thickening in both maxillary sinuses.<br />

CT Results<br />

CT Scan Coronal<br />

• Impression:<br />

◦ “The patient has findings most compatible with Grave’s<br />

Ophthalmopathy.”<br />

Coursebook Page 104 of 139<br />

5


5/29/2012<br />

CT Scan Coronal<br />

Treatment Options<br />

• Researched treatment options that would work best<br />

for this patient.<br />

• Decided that oral prednisone would be best with<br />

goals of:<br />

◦ 1. Reducing periorbital edema.<br />

◦ 2. Reducing amount of exophthalmos.<br />

◦ 3. Reducing diplopia.<br />

• Who should manage this treatment plan<br />

Co-management with PCP<br />

Called clinical pharmacist at the VA<br />

• We called the patient’s PCP at 12:15pm on 09/27/11 to<br />

update her with the status of this condition and ask if she<br />

would feel more comfortable handling the Prednisone<br />

treatment.<br />

• She responded that she would prefer that someone with<br />

more experience in this field handled the treatment, and<br />

she would be happy to coordinate follow up for systemic<br />

side effects with Mr. Parks' primary care health team.<br />

• Primary health team includes VA PCP, VA clinical<br />

pharmacist, private PCP, pulmonologist, and<br />

cardiologist.<br />

• Asked him to review the patient’s medications and<br />

relate any concerns with starting oral prednisone.<br />

◦ Patient is already taking Ranitidine.<br />

◦ No major contraindications after reviewing problem list and<br />

medications.<br />

Prednisone versus Prednisolone<br />

Watch Liver Function<br />

WWVAMC 10/12/11<br />

• "Though prednisone and prednisolone are used in the same manner<br />

and equally as effective, they should not be confused with each<br />

other. Prednisone is activated by the liver into prednisolone. For<br />

this reason and because it is more easily absorbed, prednisolone is<br />

the drug of choice when hepatic disease or insufficiency is present."<br />

They are both intermediate strength synthetic corticosteroids.<br />

"Prednisone and prednisolone are synthetic members of the<br />

glucocorticoid class of hormones. They are an intermediate acting,<br />

broad antiinflammatory, medication. They have less activity than<br />

dexamethasone or betamethasone, but exhibit greater activity than<br />

hydrocortisone."<br />

From http://patients.uptodate.com/topic.aspf…<br />

• 77 yo WHITE MALE c Graves ophthalmopathy<br />

(Thyroid Eye Disease = TED) presents for follow up.<br />

• Patient reports no diplopia in straight ahead gaze<br />

since addition of 3^BD RE fresnel prism at last<br />

appointment, but image feels like it is "trying to pull<br />

apart."<br />

• Vet reports diplopia at times when looking to the<br />

side, up, or down.<br />

• Vet reports no pain or irritation BE. No dryness or<br />

tearing or redness. Vet reports that sunlight is<br />

bothersome BE.<br />

Coursebook Page 105 of 139<br />

6


5/29/2012<br />

10/12/11<br />

• EOMS: smooth pursuits. LE: restricted sup/temp,<br />

sup, and sup/nas<br />

◦ Diplopia reported in all field of gaze, worse with sup and<br />

sup/left gaze.<br />

◦ Pain Rating 0/10 in all gazes<br />

10/12/11<br />

• VISUAL ACUITY:<br />

• Current Spec Rx & lens type: St 28, 3^bd Fresnel over RE<br />

• RE:+1.25-1.25*092 3^ BD 20/50 PH: 20/40<br />

• LE:+1.75-2.50*082 2^ BU 20/25+1<br />

• Add:2.25<br />

• Refraction:<br />

• Right:+0.75-2.00*092 20/25-2<br />

• COLOR VISION/RED CAP (RE%/LE%): Equal saturation<br />

• AMSLER GRID: No metamorphopsia in either eye<br />

• SLE:<br />

• LIDS, LASHES, ADNEXA: BE: 2-3+ edematous upper lids, 2+<br />

dermatochalasis, 2+ MG inspissation, scalloped lid margins, 1+ debris<br />

10/12/11<br />

10/12/11<br />

• TONOMETRY BY iCare:<br />

• straight ahead: 18/15<br />

• up: 21/18<br />

• left: 15/14<br />

• right: 17/13<br />

• Blood pressure 146/68 pulse measurement 68<br />

• Weight: 212.5 lbs<br />

• Exophthalmometry: 22/21 @ 110<br />

• Interpalpebral distance measured vertically:<br />

• straight ahead: 10/10 mm<br />

• up: 12/13 mm<br />

10/12/11 10/12/11<br />

Coursebook Page 106 of 139<br />

7


5/29/2012<br />

10/12/11 Posterior Pole<br />

WWVAMC 10/12/11<br />

Non-VA Physicians<br />

• ASSESSMENT(S):<br />

• 1) Graves Ophthalmopathy (Thyroid Eye Disease) with incomitant strabismus and<br />

• near constant diplopia, partially relieved by Fresnel prism. Veteran already<br />

• on ranitidine.<br />

• PLAN(S):<br />

• 1) Veteran is unable to withstand surgical management and steroid<br />

• immunosuppression is the best/only option - patient education. Before<br />

• prescribing prednisone, non-VA providers will be contacted for consensus on<br />

• treatment. 20 mg/day oral prednisone to be started for 1 week with patient<br />

• monitoring his blood pressure, pulse, and weight - with plan to increase to 40<br />

• mg/day if well-tolerated. Return to Walla Walla after 4 weeks of treatment;<br />

• fasting labs: Chem, UA, CBC.<br />

• PATIENT EDUCACTION:<br />

• Reviewed common side effects of Prednisone with patient and his spouse<br />

• including: osteoporosis, irritability/depression, and heartburn/GI tract<br />

• disorders. We also discussed the increased risk of exacerbation of<br />

• hypertension and congestive heart failure.<br />

• Pulmonology: Spokane<br />

• Cardiology: Spokane<br />

• Primary Care: Lewiston<br />

• All gave the okay for to start oral Prednisone.<br />

• Pulmonologist said if anything, it would help his<br />

pulmonary hypertension.<br />

• Everyone offered to help monitor for side effects and<br />

help with the taper when finished.<br />

How to prescribe Prednisone (Up-to-date) 18<br />

Started Prednisone<br />

• “The optimal dose of prednisone is uncertain. Some<br />

clinicians initiate therapy with a high dose, such as 100<br />

mg/day. However, doses of 30 to 40 mg/day appear to be<br />

as effective and have fewer side effects. Improvement<br />

usually occurs within four weeks. About one-half of<br />

patients have a good response to prednisone by the end<br />

of six months; those patients with less muscle swelling<br />

are more likely to respond [19]. However, given the many<br />

side effects of prolonged high-dose prednisone<br />

treatment, other treatments should be considered if the<br />

patient does not respond in four to six weeks. IF a good<br />

response occurs, the daily dose should be decreased to<br />

the lowest dose at which improvement is maintained.”<br />

• 10/18/11 20mg po once a day<br />

• 10/25/11 40mg po once a day<br />

Coursebook Page 107 of 139<br />

8


5/29/2012<br />

WWVAMC 11/21/11 – 1 month of treatment<br />

• REASON FOR EXAM//CC:<br />

• 77 yo WHITE MALE c Graves ophthalmopathy (Thyroid<br />

Eye Disease = TED) presents for follow up.<br />

• Vet reports that the double vision has gradually<br />

improved as he has taken the prednisone and that he<br />

feels his vision has cleared up a little bit. He feels the<br />

prednisone is helping. Vet reports that the right eye has<br />

become a little more fuzzy when looking through his<br />

glasses.<br />

• Vet reports no pain or irritation BE. No dryness or<br />

tearing or redness. Vet reports that sunlight is<br />

bothersome BE.<br />

11/21/11<br />

• EOMS: smooth pursuits. RE: sup restriction; LE:<br />

restricted sup/temp, sup, and sup/nas<br />

◦ With correction no diplopia straight ahead gaze or straight<br />

right or straight left, diplopia reported sup and inf gazes.<br />

◦ Pain Rating 0/10 in all gazes<br />

• Tried taking Fresnel prism off right lens - vet<br />

reported diplopia in straight ahead gaze as a<br />

"shadow trying to pull off the letters“<br />

• Amsler Grid:<br />

• RE: (-) scotoma, (-) metamorphopsia<br />

• LE: (-) scotoma, (-) metamorphopsia<br />

11/21/11<br />

11/21/11<br />

• Refraction:<br />

• Right: Plano-1.00*088 20/25-2 4^ base down<br />

• Left: +1.25-2.50*088 20/25 3^ base up<br />

• Vertical Vergences at distance and near: 7 right hyper<br />

• Vet reported single vision with 7^ BD RE, Diplopia with 6^<br />

BD<br />

• Adjustable Maddox Rod s correction:<br />

• Horizontal: 5-6 XP'<br />

• Vertical: 14 right hyper<br />

• SLE:<br />

◦ LIDS, LASHES, ADNEXA: BE: 2-3+ edematous upper lids, 2+ dermatochalasis, 2+ MG<br />

inspissation, scalloped lid margins, 1+ debris<br />

◦ CONJ: Tr ping N&T BE.<br />

• TONOMETRY BY iCare:<br />

• straight ahead: 21/18 @ 1319<br />

• up: 27/21<br />

• left: 20/21<br />

• right: 19/15<br />

• Blood pressure 153/59 pulse measurement 61<br />

• Weight: 210.1 lbs<br />

• Exophthalmometry: 21/20 @ 110<br />

• Interpalpebral distance measured vertically:<br />

• straight ahead: 09/09 mm<br />

• up: 07/09 mm<br />

11/21/11<br />

WWVAMC 11/21/11 – 1 month treatment<br />

• DFE: SLE: +78<br />

• DILATED PUPIL SIZE: 8 mm<br />

• LENS: BE PCIOL s/p YAG, clear and centered<br />

• VITREOUS: BE PVD and ant syneresis<br />

• OPTIC NERVE C/D RATIO: RE: 0.5/0.5v; LE:<br />

0.45/0.45v<br />

• MACULAE: BE Flat & dry. RE>LE pigment clumps/RPE<br />

changes, similar to photos 11/18/09<br />

• POSTERIOR POLE (vascular arcades to mid-periphery):<br />

intact BE<br />

• VESSELS: A:V = 2:3,mild crossing changes<br />

• ASSESSMENT(S):<br />

• 1) Graves Ophthalmopathy (Thyroid Eye Disease) with incomitant<br />

strabismus and<br />

• diplopia relieved by prism and dry eye.<br />

• 2) Mild dry macular degeneration, bilateral<br />

• 3) Pseduophakia, bilateral<br />

• 4) Glaucoma suspect due to large cup-to-disc ratios<br />

• 5) Bilateral posterior vitreous detachment<br />

• 6) Presbyopia, right eye simple myopic astigmatism, left eye mixed<br />

astigmatism<br />

Coursebook Page 108 of 139<br />

9


5/29/2012<br />

WWVAMC 11/21/11 – 1 month of Treatment<br />

WWVAMC 12/19/11 – 2 months treatment<br />

• PLAN(S):<br />

• 1) Veteran has noticed a decrease in the frequency of diplopia. No diplopia<br />

• noted with straight ahead gaze with the aid of prisms today, which is an<br />

• improvement from previous exam 10/12/11. Continue oral prednisone 40mg/day.<br />

• Veteran will continue to monitor his blood pressure, pulse, and weight. Continue<br />

• to use artificial tears four times a day as needed both eyes. Return<br />

• to Walla Walla clinic 12/19/11 for follow up appointment.<br />

• 2) Patient education. Continue to use Amsler grid at home to monitor for<br />

• distortion. Monitor.<br />

• 3)4)5) Patient education. Monitor.<br />

• 6) Continue to wear habitual spectacles with 3^ base down Fresnel prism on right<br />

• lens. Right eye prescription has changed. Will wait on new glasses since amount<br />

• of prism could change while on Prednisone. Final spectacle prescription today:<br />

• Right: Plano-1.00*088 20/25-2 4^ base down<br />

• Left: +1.25-2.50*088 20/25 3^ base up<br />

• 77 yo WHITE MALE c Graves ophthalmopathy<br />

presents for follow up appointment. Vet reports that<br />

his right eye is still a little blurry (has the Fresnel<br />

prism on it). Vet reports no diplopia with the glasses<br />

and Fresnel prism on.<br />

• Vet reports compliance taking oral Prednisone<br />

40mg/day.<br />

• Subjective Symptoms: Vet reports no pain or<br />

irritation BE. No dryness, tearing, or redness. Vet<br />

reports that sunlight is bothersome BE.<br />

12/19/11 – 2 mos treatment<br />

12/19/11<br />

• External Exam, Chair Skills, Slit Lamp<br />

◦ Improved periorbital edema BE<br />

◦ Tr-1+ diffuse SPK<br />

◦ Stable compared to previous exam<br />

• Refraction:<br />

• Right:Plano-1.25*088 20/30+1 6^ base down<br />

• Left: +1.25-2.25*088 20/25 6^ base up<br />

• Add: 2.50 20/25<br />

• BINOCULAR TESTING:<br />

• Horiz phoria @ distance: 3.5 BO<br />

• Vertical phoria @ distance: 15 left hypo<br />

• Horiz phoria @ near:<br />

• Vertical phoria @ near: 9 BI<br />

• Vertical phoria @ distance: 15 left hypo<br />

• Adjustable Maddox Rod s correction:<br />

• Horizontal: 5 XP'<br />

• Vertical: 14 right hyper<br />

12/19/11<br />

WWVAMC 12/19/11 – 2 mos treatment<br />

• TONOMETRY BY iCare:<br />

• straight ahead: 18/15 @ 1044<br />

• up: 23/18<br />

• left: 18/15<br />

• right: 17/16<br />

• Blood pressure 160/60 pulse measurement 69<br />

• Weight: 210.4 lbs<br />

• ASSESSMENT(S):<br />

• 1) Graves Ophthalmopathy (Thyroid Eye Disease)<br />

with incomitant strabismus and diplopia relieved by<br />

prism and dry eye.<br />

• 2) Presbyopia, right eye simple myopic astigmatism,<br />

left eye mixed astigmatism.<br />

• Exophthalmometry: 20/20 @ 110<br />

• Interpalpebral distance measured vertically:<br />

• straight ahead: 09/09 mm<br />

• up: 10/11 mm<br />

Coursebook Page 109 of 139<br />

10


5/29/2012<br />

WWVAMC 12/19/11 – 2 months treatment<br />

WWVAMC 01/24/12 – 3 months treatment<br />

• PLAN(S):<br />

• 1) Patient education. No apparent change in the level of diplopia. Eye comfort and edema of<br />

upper lids have both improved since oral predisone therapy began 2 months ago. Continue to<br />

take one 20mg tablet of prednisone by mouth twice a day. If no improvement of diplopia is<br />

noted at next exam we will discuss tapering off the prednisone. Continue to use Refresh Plus<br />

artificial tears four times a day as needed, and ocular lubricant ointment once at night both<br />

eyes. Veteran will call if any changes in vision or overall health. Monitor in one month.<br />

• 2) Patient picked out a new frame today to use in case new lenses are ordered with prism<br />

ground in at a future date. Veteran did not report any diplopia when the Fresnel prism was<br />

removed from the right spectacle lens. The right spectacle lens in over-plussed, which causes<br />

the patient to use his left eye for the majority of his vision, thereby, reducing the symptoms of<br />

double vision. Fresnel prism was cleaned and placed in an envelope for Mr. Parks, so he can reapply<br />

it if needed at a future date. Continue to use habitual prescription, full-time wear. Final<br />

spectacle prescription today:<br />

Right:Plano-1.25*088 20/30+1 6^ base down<br />

Left: +1.25-2.25*088 20/25 6^ base up<br />

Add: 2.50<br />

• REASON FOR EXAM//CC:<br />

• 77 yo WHITE MALE c Graves ophthalmopathy presents<br />

for follow up appointment. Vet reports that his right eye<br />

is still a little blurry (has the Fresnel prism on it). Vet<br />

reports no diplopia with the glasses and Fresnel prism<br />

on. Vet reports that he did try using the glasses without<br />

the Fresnel prism, but experienced diplopia without it.<br />

• Vet reports compliance taking oral Prednisone<br />

40mg/day.<br />

• Subjective Symptoms: Vet reports no pain or irritation<br />

BE. No dryness or tearing or redness. Vet reports that<br />

sunlight is bothersome BE.<br />

01/24/12 – 3 mos treatment<br />

01/24/12<br />

• External Exam, Chair Skills, Slit Lamp<br />

◦ Improved periorbital edema BE<br />

◦ Tr-1+ diffuse SPK BE<br />

◦ Stable compared to previous exam<br />

• Refraction:<br />

• Right:Plano-1.25*090 20/30+2 6^ base down<br />

• Left: +1.00-2.00*095 20/25 6^ base up<br />

• Add: 2.50 20/25<br />

• Trial Frame: had patient wear this prescription for 10-15 minutes as he walked<br />

• around the clinic and tried reading. Mr. Parks reported comfortable, clear,<br />

• single vision.<br />

• BINOCULAR TESTING:<br />

• Horiz phoria @ distance: 3 BO<br />

• Vertical phoria @ distance: 15-16 left hypo<br />

• Horiz phoria @ near:<br />

• Vertical phoria @ near: 6-7 BI<br />

• Vertical phoria @ distance: 13-14 left hypo<br />

• Adjustable Maddox Rod s correction:<br />

• Horizontal: 4 XP'<br />

• Vertical: 14 right hyper<br />

01/24/12<br />

WWVAMC 01/24/12 – 3 mos treatment<br />

• TONOMETRY BY Tpen:<br />

• straight ahead: 25/24 @ 1012<br />

• up: 28/24<br />

• left: 26/25<br />

• right: 25/24<br />

• Blood pressure 159/75 pulse measurement 71<br />

• Weight: 216.5 lbs<br />

• Exophthalmometry: 21/20 @ 110<br />

• ASSESSMENT(S):<br />

• 1) Graves Ophthalmopathy (Thyroid Eye Disease)<br />

with incomitant strabismus and diplopia relieved by<br />

prism and dry eye.<br />

• 2) Presbyopia, right eye simple myopic astigmatism,<br />

left eye mixed astigmatism<br />

• Interpalpebral distance measured vertically:<br />

• straight ahead: 09/09 mm<br />

• up: 11/13 mm<br />

Coursebook Page 110 of 139<br />

11


5/29/2012<br />

WWVAMC 01/24/12 – 3 mos treatment<br />

Telephone Visits – 4 mos treat, 1 mo of taper<br />

• PLAN(S):<br />

• 1) Patient education. No apparent change in the level of diplopia. Eye<br />

• comfort and edema of upper lids have both improved since oral predisone therapy<br />

• began 3 months ago. Start taper of oral prednisone. Reduce from 40mg to 30mg for<br />

• one month. Called Mr. Parks primary care physician, Dr. Celso Chavez, who will<br />

• then see Mr. Parks for follow up to reduce travel for veteran. Then reduce to<br />

• 20mg for one month. Return to eye clinic in 2 months for follow up with<br />

• tonometry. Continue to use Refresh Plus artificial tears four times a day as<br />

• needed, and ocular lubricant ointment once at night both eyes. Veteran will call<br />

• if any changes in vision or overall health.<br />

• 2) Order final spectacle prescription full-time wear with high-index transition<br />

• lenses (thyroid eye disease), a rush put on the order:<br />

• Right:Plano-1.25*090 20/30+2 6^ base down<br />

• Left: +1.00-2.00*095 20/25 6^ base up<br />

• Add: 2.50 20/25<br />

• PATIENT EDUCATION:<br />

• Reviewed common side effects of Prednisone with patient including: osteoporosis,<br />

• irritability/depression, and heartburn/GI tract disorders. We also discussed the<br />

• increased risk of exacerbation of hypertension and congestive heart failure.<br />

• 02/28/11: I called veteran to see how he was doing on. He was<br />

not home, but I spoke with his wife who said he was doing<br />

well, but still waiting for his glasses.<br />

• 03/01/11: I received a phone message from veteran saying<br />

that he was in the hospital and wanted to talk with me about<br />

the glasses that were ordered.<br />

• 03/02/11: Veteran reported that he felt dizzy and passed out<br />

on Wednesday of this week. He was getting ready to be<br />

discharged from the hospital when I was speaking with him<br />

on the phone. Veteran reports that the doctors told him that<br />

he was low on oxygen, and they think that may be why he<br />

passed out. He has increased his oxygen to a 7 or 8.<br />

03/02/12 Telephone<br />

03/14/12 Telephone<br />

• Veteran reports that he is doing well the the prednisone<br />

taper, and that his primary care physician has been<br />

seeing him and ensuring that the taper is going well.<br />

Veteran is currently down to 20mg a day and is<br />

scheduled to reduce to 10mg a day starting March 24th.<br />

• Veteran has an appointment scheduled at the eye clinic<br />

on March 20th. He reported that he was not sure if he<br />

would be up to traveling yet by that time. I told him to<br />

call and let me know. If he can't make it, we can continue<br />

to work with his PCP with his follow ups concerning the<br />

tapering of the Prednisone.<br />

• Veteran at nursing home to help with recovery.<br />

• Veteran reports compliance with the taper of the Prednisone.<br />

He will continue to take 20mg once a day until March 24th.<br />

He will then start taking 10mg once a day until April 24 th .<br />

• Veteran reports he needs a prescription written out for<br />

Prednisone so the nursing home can continue to give it to<br />

him.<br />

• I suggested that veteran speak with his private primary care<br />

doctor who signed the paperwork needed to stay at the<br />

nursing home to see if he could provide the prescription.<br />

Veteran spoke with his PCP and reports he was able to provide<br />

the prescription.<br />

04/12/12 – 6 mos treatment, 3 mos taper<br />

04/12/12<br />

• 77 yo MALE c Graves ophthalmopathy presents for follow up<br />

appointment.<br />

• Vet received his new glasses yesterday and reports that he can<br />

see much better with them. No diplopia and clearer vision<br />

with the spectacles.<br />

• Current ocular medications:<br />

◦ Refresh AT q2-4 hrs BE<br />

◦ Ocular lubricant at night BE<br />

◦ Prednisone 10mg po qd.<br />

• Veteran is using a battery operated 4-wheel scooter that he<br />

said has greatly improved his independence and mobility and<br />

allows him to enjoy being outdoors again. Doctors<br />

discontinued Sildenafil.<br />

• Subjective Symptoms: Veteran reports no pain or irritation<br />

BE. Veteran reports that his eye do not feel as puffy and that<br />

they do not feel dry.<br />

Coursebook Page 111 of 139<br />

12


5/29/2012<br />

• VISUAL ACUITY:<br />

04/12/12<br />

• Current Spec Rx & lens type: ST 28<br />

• Right:Plano-1.25*090 20/30 6^ base down<br />

• Left: +1.00-2.00*095 20/30 6^ base up<br />

• Add: 2.50 20/25<br />

04/12/12<br />

• External Exam: Negative for head tilt/turn, ptosis, abnormal<br />

symmetry, skin disorders.<br />

• PERRL(-)APD: 5-3, 2+ RL<br />

• EOMS:LE restricted sup/temp, RE restricted inf, (+) diplopia<br />

sup/temp and inf gazes, Pain Rating 0/10 in all gazes.<br />

• Cover Test cc: Distance: ortho<br />

• Near: 3-4 exo<br />

• Confrontation VF: Full to finger counting<br />

• AMSLER GRID: No metamorphopsia in either eye<br />

• Adjustable Maddox Rod c correction:<br />

• Horizontal: ortho<br />

• Vertical: ortho<br />

04/12/12<br />

• Blood pressure: 114/66 Pulse: 80<br />

• Weight: 211.1 lbs<br />

• Exophthalmometry: 19/19 @ 110<br />

◦ (22/21 @ 110 on 09/09/11)<br />

•<br />

• Interpalpebral distance measured vertically:<br />

• straight ahead: 10/10 mm<br />

◦ Right eye hyper, lid at upper part of non-dilated pupil, left eye lid<br />

2mm above upper edge of non-dilated pupil.<br />

• up: 14/14 mm<br />

04/12/12<br />

• SLE:<br />

• LIDS, LASHES, ADNEXA: RE: 1+ edematous upper lid;<br />

LE: 1+ edematous upper lid; BE<br />

• 1+ dermatochalasis, 1+ MG inspissation, scalloped lid<br />

margins<br />

• CONJ: Tr ping N&T BE.<br />

• CORNEA: Tr-1+ arcus 360 BE, Tr diffuse SPK cent to inf<br />

BE<br />

• A/C: Deep & quiet without cell or flare<br />

• IRIS: Normal, without NVI<br />

• LENS: BE: PCIOL centered, s/p YAG<br />

• Tears: Mid volume with breakup time >10 sec BE<br />

04/12/12<br />

04/12/12<br />

• TONOMETRY BY Tpen:<br />

• straight ahead: 15/13 @ 0934<br />

• up: 20/14<br />

• left: 15/15<br />

• right: 15/14<br />

• down: 17/17<br />

• DFE: SLE: +78<br />

• Stable compared to previous exams.<br />

• (-) optic neuropathy<br />

Coursebook Page 112 of 139<br />

13


5/29/2012<br />

04/12/12, 6 mos treatment, 3 mos taper<br />

• ASSESSMENT:<br />

• 1) Graves Ophthalmopathy (Thyroid Eye Disease) with<br />

dry eye, incomitant strabismus, and diplopia relieved by<br />

prism.<br />

• PLAN:<br />

• 1) Discussed that diplopia is stable and veteran reports<br />

that he feels better and that new spectacles are working<br />

great. Eye comfort and edema of upper lids have both<br />

improved since oral prednisone therapy began. Continue<br />

to taper prednisone. Continue to use Refresh Plus<br />

artificial tears four times a day as needed, and ocular<br />

lubricant ointment once at night both eyes. Veteran will<br />

call if any changes in vision or overall health. Monitor.<br />

Taper Schedule<br />

• 4/24 - 5/14 7.5 mg daily (3 weeks)<br />

• 5/15 - 6/04 5.0 mg daily (3 weeks)<br />

• 6/11 - 6/24 4 mg daily (2 weeks)<br />

• 6/25 - 7/08 3 mg daily (2 weeks)<br />

• 7/09 - 7/22 2 mg daily (2 weeks)<br />

• 7/23 - 7/30 1.5 mg daily (1 week)<br />

• 7/30 - 8/06 1 mg daily (1 week)<br />

• 8/07 - 8/13 0.5 mg daily (1 week)<br />

• 8/14, 8/16, 8/18 0.5 mg every other day for 3 doses<br />

then stop<br />

Goals<br />

04/12/12<br />

9/9/11 10/13 10/18 11/21 12/19 1/24/12 4/12/12<br />

Proptosis 22/21 22/21 Start 21/20 20/20 21/20 19/19<br />

Tx<br />

Prism 8^ 8^ 7^ 12^ 12^ 12^<br />

Reduce<br />

Periorbit<br />

al Edema<br />

See<br />

photos<br />

04/12/12 04/12/12<br />

Coursebook Page 113 of 139<br />

14


5/29/2012<br />

04/12/12 Reduction in edema around eyes<br />

10/12/11 04/12/12<br />

Radioiodine in the treatment of Hyperthyroidism<br />

Risk of worsening or new onset ophthalmopathy<br />

• 69% of North American thyroid specialists chose<br />

radioiodine for a hypothetical patient with Graves’<br />

hyperthyroidism in a survey from 1990 1 .<br />

• There is increasing evidence that radioiodine<br />

therapy can cause the development or worsening of<br />

Graves’ ophthalmopathy more often than antithyroid<br />

drug therapy or surgery.<br />

TRIAL<br />

Radio<br />

iodine<br />

Methi<br />

mazole<br />

Surg<br />

ery<br />

Radio + Pred (3 mos) n New<br />

Onset<br />

Tallstedt 2 33% 10% 16% 168 13%<br />

Traisk 3 39% 21% 313 24%<br />

Bartalena 4 15% 4% 0% + 67% of patients who 443<br />

already had<br />

ophthalmopathy<br />

improved.<br />

Ponto 5 20% 5%<br />

Radioiodine in the treatment of Hyperthyroidism<br />

Lower vs. higher doses of Radioiodine<br />

• In patients with initially mild ophthalmopathy,<br />

worsening after radioiodine therapy may be prevented by<br />

the concurrent administration of glucocorticoids 4 .<br />

• An alternative option for patients with moderate to<br />

severe eye disease is to delay treatment with radioiodine<br />

until the eye disease has been stable for at least one<br />

year 6 .<br />

• In addition, radioiodine should be used with caution in<br />

patients with risk factors for ophthalmopathy, including<br />

smoking, or a high baseline serum concentration of<br />

triiodothyronine 6 .<br />

• Patients are left hypothyroid and supplements such<br />

as Levothyroxine are then used after Radioiodine<br />

therapy. Why not try to leave patients euthyroid after<br />

Radioiodine treatment<br />

◦ 1. Low-dose radioiodine therapy is more likely to result in<br />

treatment failure, necessitating another dose in 6 to 24<br />

months 7,8 .<br />

◦ 2. Less than one-third of patients are euthyroid 10 years after<br />

therapy 9 .<br />

◦ 3. Many patients have chronic subclinical hyperthyroidism,<br />

with its associated risks of atrial fibrillation and reduced bone<br />

density.<br />

Coursebook Page 114 of 139<br />

15


5/29/2012<br />

Graves’ Ophthalmopathy Review<br />

Graves’ Ophthalmopathy Review<br />

• Thyroid eye disease is a heterogeneous autoimmune<br />

orbital reaction 10 .<br />

• The overwhelming majority (90%) of thyroid eye<br />

disease cases are associated with hyperthyroidism,<br />

while the rest are either euthyroid or hypothyroid 11 .<br />

• Approximately half of Graves’ disease patients<br />

experience ophthalmic manifestations, with sightthreatening<br />

disease in 3% to 5% of cases 12 .<br />

• It is the most common orbital disorder in adults 13 .<br />

• Different terms:<br />

◦ Graves’ orbitopathy<br />

◦ Thyroid-associated ophthalmopathy<br />

◦ Thyroid-related ophthalmopathy<br />

◦ Graves’ ophthalmopathy<br />

◦ Thyroid eye disease<br />

◦ Thyroid orbitopathy<br />

◦ Endocrine exophthalmos<br />

◦ Malignant exophthalmos<br />

◦ Infiltrative ophthalmopathy<br />

Risk Factors<br />

Risk Factors<br />

• 1. Hyperthyroidism<br />

◦ The highest risk factor, although there is a subset of patients<br />

who are euthyroid or hypothryroid 11 .<br />

• 2. Smoking<br />

◦ Once a patient has Grave’s disease, the major clinical risk<br />

factor for developing thyroid eye disease is smoking 14 .<br />

◦ Patients with thyroid eye disease are four times more likely to<br />

be smokers or former smokers than never smokers 14 .<br />

◦ The greater the number of cigarettes smoked per day, the<br />

greater the risk 15 .<br />

◦ Also increases the risk for progression of ophthalmopathy after<br />

radioiodine therapy 16 .<br />

• 3. Sex<br />

◦ Women are five to eight times more likely to be affected by<br />

thyroid eye disease than men, but this largely reflects the<br />

increased incidence of Graves’ disease in women 15,19 .<br />

◦ Once someone has Graves’ disease, his or her sex has little<br />

effect on the risk 15 .<br />

◦ Men older than 60 may be at increased risk may be more<br />

severe disease 17 .<br />

• 4. Radioiodine<br />

Risk Factors<br />

Graves’ Ophthalmopathy Review<br />

• 5. Genetics<br />

◦ Multiple genes are likely to be involved in the development of<br />

thyroid eye diseases, and these interact with multiple<br />

environmental risk factors 15 .<br />

◦ An immunological predisposition is likely based on the<br />

increased incidence in certain HLA (DR, B8, and DW) types<br />

and recent genetic mapping of loci for Graves’ disease in some<br />

patients to chromosome 14 11 .<br />

This genetic localization to chromosome 14 is in the area of the<br />

gene for the TSH receptor, but to date no mapping to the area of<br />

the HLA region has been found 11 .<br />

• Possible Symptoms 19 :<br />

◦ Red eye<br />

◦ Foreign-body sensation<br />

◦ Tearing<br />

◦ Decreased vision<br />

◦ Dyschromatopsia<br />

◦ Binocular diplopia<br />

◦ Prominent (“bulging”) eyes<br />

Coursebook Page 115 of 139<br />

16


5/29/2012<br />

Graves’ Ophthalmopathy Review<br />

Graves’ Ophthalmopathy Review<br />

• Signs 19 :<br />

◦ Eyelid retraction<br />

◦ Edema<br />

◦ Lagophthalmos<br />

◦ Lid lag (von Graefe’s sign)<br />

◦ Reduced blinking<br />

◦ Superficial keratopathy<br />

◦ Conjunctival injection<br />

◦ Exophthalmos<br />

◦ Limitation of extraocular movements<br />

Supraduction most common reflecting inferior rectus involvement<br />

• Signs 19 :<br />

◦ Positive forced ductions<br />

◦ Resistance to retropulsion of globe<br />

◦ Decreased visual acuity<br />

◦ Decreased color vision<br />

◦ Relative afferent papillary defect<br />

◦ Visual field defect<br />

◦ Acute congestion of the socket and periocular tissues<br />

Graves’ Ophthalmopathy Review<br />

Graves’ Ophthalmopathy Review<br />

• Werner Classification of Eye Findings 19 :<br />

◦ No signs or symptoms.<br />

◦ Only signs.<br />

◦ Soft tissue involvement (signs and symptoms).<br />

◦ Proptosis.<br />

◦ Extraocular muscle involvement.<br />

◦ Corneal involvement.<br />

◦ Sight loss (optic nerve compression).<br />

• American Thyroid Association Grading System 20 :<br />

◦ Class I<br />

Solely involves lid retraction and stare<br />

◦ Class II<br />

Soft tissue symptoms and signs (chemosis/edema)<br />

◦ Class III<br />

Proptosis<br />

◦ Class IV<br />

Decreased motility and/or diplopia<br />

◦ Class V and Class VI<br />

Corneal exposure symptoms/signs<br />

◦ Class VI<br />

Optic neuropathy<br />

Treatment of Graves’ Orbitopathy<br />

Treatment of Graves’ Orbitopathy<br />

• Treatment of patients has 3 components:<br />

◦ Reversal of hyperthyroidism, if present<br />

◦ Symptomatic treatment<br />

◦ Treatment with a glucocorticoid, and/or orbital irradiation,<br />

and/or orbital decompression surgery to reduce inflammation<br />

in the periorbital tissues.<br />

• Symptomatic Treatment<br />

◦ Sunglasses<br />

◦ Prisms for diplopia<br />

◦ Artificial Tears and Ointments<br />

◦ Lid taping or moisture chamber goggles at nighttime<br />

Wiley X sunglasses with gasket.<br />

◦ Punctal occlusion<br />

◦ Avoid “dry eye environments”<br />

◦ Avoid sleeping on face<br />

◦ Raising the head of the bed at night<br />

◦ Cold packs<br />

◦ Smokers should stop smoking<br />

◦ Selenium 100mcg twice daily 18<br />

Coursebook Page 116 of 139<br />

17


5/29/2012<br />

Selenium 21<br />

Treatment of Graves’ Orbitopathy<br />

• “Graves' disease (GD) and ophthalmopathy (GO) are<br />

organ-specific autoimmune-inflammatory disorders<br />

characterized by a complex pathogenesis.<br />

• The inflammatory process is dominated by an imbalance<br />

of the antioxidant-oxidant mechanism, increased<br />

production of radical oxygen species (ROS), and<br />

cytokines which sustain the autoimmune process and<br />

perpetuate the disease.<br />

• Recently, selenium, which is a powerful antioxidant, has<br />

been successfully applied in patients with mild GO,<br />

slowing the progression of disease, decreasing the clinical<br />

activity score, and appreciably improving the quality of<br />

life.”<br />

• Glucocorticoid Therapy<br />

◦ Primary treatment for moderate to severe Graves’<br />

◦ Oral<br />

◦ Intravenous<br />

◦ Retrobulbar or subconjunctival injections have been found to<br />

be less effective, but can be used if oral or intravenous routes<br />

are contraindicated 20 .<br />

◦ Should monitor liver function and watch for possible side<br />

effects such as hyperglycemia and increased blood pressure.<br />

Contraindications and possible side effects of<br />

Prednisone from Micromedex.<br />

Contraindications and possible side effects of<br />

Prednisone from Micromedex.<br />

• Common<br />

• Cardiovascular:<br />

• Hypertension<br />

◦ All corticosteroids cause sodium retention which results in FLUID RETENTION.<br />

◦ Older patients or those with a history of hypertension are more likely to develop HIGH BLOOD<br />

PRESSURE during treatment with corticosteroids.<br />

• Dermatologic:<br />

• Acne, Ecchymosis, Atrophic condition of skin, Impaired healing.<br />

• Endocrine metabolic:<br />

• Body fluid retention, Decreased body growth, Hypernatremia<br />

• Gastrointestinal:<br />

• Gastrointestinal perforation, Gastrointestinal ulcer, Pancreatitis, Superinfection<br />

• Immunologic:<br />

• Superinfection: At higher risk for infection<br />

• Musculoskeletal: Osteoporosis<br />

• Psychiatric: Depression, Euphoria<br />

• -Serious<br />

• Endocrine metabolic:<br />

• Cushing's syndrome, Hyperglycemia, Primary<br />

adrenocortical insufficiency<br />

• Ophthalmic:<br />

• Cataract (2.5-60% incidence), Glaucoma (more likely<br />

after 1 year or more of therapy), increased IOP (decreases<br />

the outflow), central serous retinopathy, optic nerve<br />

damage<br />

• Respiratory:<br />

• Pulmonary tuberculosis, abscess of lung, aspergillosis,<br />

interstitial pneumonia, pulmonary nocardiosis.<br />

Prednisone Possible Drug Interactions<br />

Prednisone Possible Drug Interactions<br />

• Acenocoumarol<br />

Alatrofloxacin<br />

Alcuronium<br />

Aldesleukin<br />

Alfalfa<br />

Amobarbital<br />

Amphotericin B Liposome<br />

Anthrax Vaccine Adsorbed<br />

Aprobarbital<br />

Asparaginase<br />

Aspirin<br />

Atracurium<br />

Bacillus of Calmette and Guerin Vaccine,<br />

Live<br />

Balofloxacin<br />

Bupropion<br />

Butabarbital<br />

Butalbital<br />

Carbamazepine<br />

Cinoxacin<br />

Ciprofloxacin<br />

Cisatracurium<br />

Clarithromycin<br />

Clinafloxacin<br />

• Cyclosporine<br />

Desogestrel<br />

Dicumarol<br />

Dienogest<br />

Diphtheria Toxoid, Adsorbed<br />

Doxacurium<br />

Drospirenone<br />

Echinacea<br />

Enoxacin<br />

Estradiol Cypionate<br />

Estradiol Valerate<br />

Ethinyl Estradiol<br />

Ethynodiol Diacetate<br />

Etonogestrel<br />

Fleroxacin<br />

Fluconazole<br />

Fluindione<br />

Flumequine<br />

Fosphenytoin<br />

Gallamine<br />

Gatifloxacin<br />

Gemifloxacin<br />

Grepafloxacin<br />

Haemophilus B Vaccine<br />

• Hepatitis A Vaccine, Inactivated<br />

Hexafluorenium<br />

Hydrochlorothiazide<br />

Indinavir<br />

Influenza Virus Vaccine<br />

Isoniazid<br />

Itraconazole<br />

Ketoconazole<br />

Levofloxacin<br />

Levonorgestrel<br />

Licorice<br />

Lomefloxacin<br />

Lyme Disease Vaccine (Recombinant<br />

OspA)<br />

Ma Huang<br />

Measles Virus Vaccine, Live<br />

Medroxyprogesterone Acetate<br />

Meningococcal Vaccine<br />

Mephobarbital<br />

Mestranol<br />

Metocurine<br />

• Mivacurium<br />

Montelukast<br />

Moxifloxacin<br />

Mumps Virus Vaccine, Live<br />

Nateglinide<br />

Neostigmine<br />

Nimodipine<br />

Norelgestromin<br />

Norethindrone<br />

Norfloxacin<br />

Norgestimate<br />

Norgestrel<br />

Ofloxacin<br />

Pancuronium<br />

Pefloxacin<br />

Pentobarbital<br />

Pertussis Vaccine<br />

Phenobarbital<br />

Phenprocoumon<br />

Phenytoin<br />

Pipecuronium<br />

Plague Vaccine<br />

Coursebook Page 117 of 139<br />

18


5/29/2012<br />

Prednisone Possible Drug Interactions<br />

Warfarin/Aspirin (Micromedex)<br />

• Pneumococcal Vaccine, Diphtheria<br />

Conjugate<br />

Pneumococcal Vaccine Polyvalent<br />

Poliovirus Vaccine, Live<br />

Primidone<br />

Prulifloxacin<br />

Pyridostigmine<br />

Quetiapine<br />

Rabies Vaccine<br />

Rifampin<br />

Rifapentine<br />

Ritonavir<br />

Rocuronium<br />

Rosoxacin<br />

Rotavirus Vaccine, Live<br />

Rubella Virus Vaccine, Live<br />

Rufloxacin<br />

Saiboku-To<br />

• Secobarbital<br />

Smallpox Vaccine<br />

Somatropin<br />

Sparfloxacin<br />

Succinylcholine<br />

Telaprevir<br />

Temafloxacin<br />

Tetanus Toxoid<br />

Tosufloxacin<br />

Tretinoin<br />

Trovafloxacin Mesylate<br />

Tuberculin<br />

Tubocurarine<br />

Typhoid Vaccine<br />

Varicella Virus Vaccine<br />

Vecuronium<br />

Warfarin<br />

Yellow Fever Vaccine<br />

• “Summary: The concomitant use of corticosteroids<br />

and anticoagulants has been associated with both<br />

enhanced and diminished anticoagulant effects.<br />

Monitoring of coagulation indices is recommended<br />

when prednisone is co-administered with an<br />

anticoagulant, such as warfarin.”<br />

Treatment of Graves’ Orbitopathy<br />

Treatment of Graves’ Orbitopathy<br />

• External orbital radiation<br />

◦ The role of orbital radiotherapy is controversial 15 .<br />

◦ Effective in up to 70% of patients 11 .<br />

◦ Has been used in the treatment of Graves’ Orbitopathy for more than<br />

90 years 20 .<br />

◦ Used for anti-inflammatory effects and radiosensitivity of activated<br />

orbital T-cells and fibroblasts 20 .<br />

◦ A common cumulative dose of radiation is 20 Gy per eye,<br />

fractionated over a 2-week period 20 .<br />

◦ Known complications are fortunately rare, but may include radiation<br />

retinopathy and cataract 20 .<br />

◦ Also theoretic concerns of cancer induction which is estimated at<br />

0.39% 20 .<br />

◦ Can be used as adjunct to steroids, decompression, or both for<br />

recalcitrant disease 20 .<br />

◦ Contraindicated in diabetic patients with pre-existing retin0pathy 15 .<br />

• Surgical interventions are deferred until a 9-12 month<br />

stable interval is recorded, except in cases of optic<br />

neuropathy or extreme proptosis causing severe<br />

exposure keratopathy 19 .<br />

• Surgery (order is stepwise posterior to anterior):<br />

◦ Orbital decompression surgery<br />

Traditional indications for decompression involved predominantly<br />

optic neuropathy and severe exposure keratopathy 10 .<br />

◦ Fat decompression surgery<br />

Removal of intraconal fat reduces congestive orbitopathy, proptosis,<br />

and may improve preoperative diplopia 10 .<br />

◦ Strabismus surgery<br />

◦ Eyelid reconstruction as indicated<br />

Optic Neuropathy 19<br />

Treatment of Graves’ Orbitopathy<br />

• “Immediate treatment with oral steroids (prednisone<br />

100mg po qd for 2-14 days).<br />

• The use of external beam irradiation (15-30Gy) is<br />

controversial and falling out of favor.<br />

• Orbital decompression for compressive optic<br />

neuropathy should be performed by an oculplastic<br />

surgeon. A balanced approach with decompression<br />

of the medial and lateral orbital walls is most<br />

commonly employed. Removal of the inferior wall is<br />

avoided if possible due to higher incidence of<br />

induced diplopia.”<br />

• Rituximab 18<br />

◦ A number of reports have indicated that some patients with<br />

severe GO may respond dramatically to B cell depletion<br />

induced by Rituximab, which is a monoclonal antibody<br />

directed against the B cell CD20 molecule.<br />

◦ Rituximab induces a fall in TSH receptor antibody levels and<br />

depletion of B cells in the retro orbital tissues, not just the<br />

periphery.<br />

◦ Currently undergoing larger trials; preliminary results from<br />

these trials suggest efficacy in some, but not all, patients.<br />

◦ Used in cases of lymphomas, leukemia, transplant rejection<br />

and some autoimmune disorders.<br />

Coursebook Page 118 of 139<br />

19


5/29/2012<br />

Treatment of Graves’ Orbitopathy<br />

Prognosis 19<br />

• Somatostatin analogs 18<br />

◦ “Have been explored as potential therapy for GO, based upon<br />

the observations that orbital fibroblasts have somatostatin<br />

receptors and the activity of orbitopathy correlates with<br />

activity on octreotide scintigrams.”<br />

• “Diplopia and ocular surface disease are common;<br />

6% develop optic nerve disease. Despite surgical<br />

rehabilitation, which may require multiple<br />

procedures, patients are often left with functional<br />

and cosmetic defects.”<br />

Quality of Life and Occupational Disability in<br />

Endocrine Orbitopathy<br />

Quality of Life and Occupational Disability in<br />

Endocrine Orbitopathy<br />

• Background<br />

◦ “In endocrine orbitopathy (EO), disfiguring proptosis and<br />

diplopia impair patients quality of life both at home and at<br />

work.”<br />

• Methods<br />

◦ “From late 2006 to the beginning of 2008, 250 outpatients in<br />

an interdisciplinary thyroid and eye clinic filled out a<br />

questionnaire about their quality of life, occupational<br />

disability, and use of psychotherapy. 400 physicians who<br />

referred their EO patients to the clinic also participated in a<br />

survey on these issues.”<br />

• Patient Results<br />

◦ 45% of the patients complained of restrictions in their daily<br />

activities.<br />

◦ 38% reported impaired self-perception.<br />

◦ 36% were on sick leave because of EO.<br />

◦ 28% were disabled.<br />

◦ 5% had retired early.<br />

◦ 3% had lost their jobs.<br />

◦ 21% underwent psychotherapy.<br />

Quality of Life and Occupational Disability in<br />

Endocrine Orbitopathy<br />

Co-management Tips<br />

• Physician results<br />

◦ 75% stated that they were taking care of temporarily disabled<br />

patients.<br />

◦ 34% stated that they were taking care of permanently disabled<br />

patients.<br />

◦ 38% stated that they were treating EO patients who were<br />

undergoing psychotherapy.<br />

• Golden Rule: “Do unto others as you would have<br />

them do unto you.”<br />

• Take the time to fully understand the case and<br />

prepare for questions the other health care<br />

professional might ask.<br />

• Have the patient’s chart with you during all<br />

communication with others.<br />

• Always look for opportunities to learn something<br />

new and build relationships with others.<br />

Coursebook Page 119 of 139<br />

20


5/29/2012<br />

Sources<br />

Sources<br />

• 1. Wartofsky L, Glinoer D, Solomon B, et al. Differences and<br />

similarities in the diagnosis and treatment of Graves’ disease<br />

in Europe, Japan, and the United States. Thyroid 1991; 1:129.<br />

• 2. Tallstedt L, Lundell G, Torring O, et al. Occurrence of<br />

ophthalmopathy after treatment for Graves’ hyperthyroidism.<br />

The Thyroid Study Group. N Engl J Med 1992; 326:1733.<br />

• 3. Traisk F, Tallstedt L, Abraham-Nordling M, et al. Thyroidassociated<br />

ophthalmopathy after treatment of Graves’<br />

hyperthyroidism with antithyroid drugs or iodine-131. J Clin<br />

Endocrinol Metab 2009; 94:3700.<br />

• 4. Bartalena L, Marcocci C, Bogazzi F, et al. Relation between<br />

therapy for hyperthyroidism and the course of Graves’<br />

ophthalmopathy. N Engl J Med 1998; 338:73.<br />

• 5. Ponto KA, Zang S, Kahaly GJ. The tale of radioiodine and<br />

Graves’ orbitopathy. Thyroid 2010 Jul; 20(7):785-93.<br />

• 6. Mariotti S, Martino E, Francesconi M, et al. Serum thyroid<br />

autoantibodies as a risk factor for development of<br />

hypothyroidism after radioactive iodine therapy for single<br />

thyroid ‘hot’ nodule. Acta Endocrinol (Copenh) 1986; 113:500.<br />

• 7. Rapoport B, Caplan R, DeGroot LJ. Low-dose sodium<br />

iodide I 131 therapy in Graves disease. JAMA 1973; 224:1610.<br />

• 8. Goolden AW, Stewart JS. Long-term results from graded<br />

low dose radioactive iodine therapy for thyrotoxicosis. Clin<br />

Endocrinol (Oxf) 1986; 24:217.<br />

• 9. Sridama V, McCormick M, Kaplan EL, et al. Long-term<br />

follow-up study of compensated low-dose 131I therapy for<br />

Graves’ disease. N Engl J Med 1984; 311:426.<br />

Sources<br />

Sources<br />

• 10. Bothun, ED, Scheurer RA, Harrison AR, et al. Update<br />

on thyroid eye disease and management. Clinical<br />

Ophthalmology 2009; 3:543-51.<br />

• 11. Burch HB, Wartofsky L. Graves’ ophthalmopathy:<br />

current concepts regarding pathogenesis and<br />

management. Endocr Rev. 1993; 14(6):747-93.<br />

• 11. Liu, GT, Volpe NJ, Galetta SL. Thyroid-associated<br />

ophthalmopathy. Neuro-ophthalmopathy: <strong>Diagnosis</strong><br />

and Mangement. Philadelphia: Saunders, 2001. 661-72.<br />

Print.<br />

• 12. Bartalena L, Pinchera A, Marcocci C. Management of<br />

Graves’ ophthalmopathy: reality and perspectives.<br />

Endocr Rev 2000;21(2):168-99.<br />

• 13. Ponto KA, Pitz S, Pfeiffer N, et al. Quality of life and<br />

occupational disability in endocrine orbitopathy. Dtsch<br />

Arztebl Int 2009; 106(17):283-9.<br />

• 14. Vestergaard, P. Smoking and thyroid disorders—a<br />

meta-analysis. Eur J Endocrinol 2002; 146:153-61.<br />

• 15. Cawood T, Moriarty P, O’Shea D. Recent<br />

developments in thyroid eye disease. BMJ 2004;<br />

329:385-90.<br />

• 16. Bartalena L, Marcocci C, Tanda ML, et al. Cigarette<br />

smoking and tretment outcomes in Graves<br />

ophthalmopathy. Ann Intern Med 1998; 129:632-5.<br />

Sources<br />

• 17. Perros P, Crombie AL, Matthews JN, Kendall-Taylor P. Age and<br />

gender influence the severity of thyroid-associated ophthalmopathy:<br />

a study of 101 patients attending a combined thryroid-eye clinic.<br />

Clin Endocrinol (Oxf) 1993; 38:367-72.<br />

• 18. Davies TF. Treatment of graves’ orbitopathy (ophthlamopathy).<br />

www.uptodate.com 20 Jun 2011.<br />

• 19. Friedman NJ, Kaiser PK, Pineda R. Thyroid-related<br />

ophthalmopathy. The Massachusetts Eye and Ear Infirmary<br />

Illustrated Manual of Ophthalmology. Saunders 2009. 15-19.<br />

• 20. Griepentrop GJ, Garrity JA. Update on the medical treatment of<br />

Graves’ ophthalmopathy. Int J of Gen Med 2009; 2:263-9.<br />

• 21. Duntas, LH. The evolving role of selenium in the treatment of<br />

graves’ disease and ophthalmopaty. J Thyroid Res 2012; Published<br />

online 2012 January 19. doi: 10.1155/2012/736161.<br />

Coursebook Page 120 of 139<br />

21


5/29/2012<br />

ACNE ROSACEA<br />

LONG TERM COMPLICATIONS OF OCULAR<br />

ROSACEA<br />

Kevin Riedel, O.D.<br />

Portland VA Medical Center<br />

Optometry Resident, PGY-1<br />

<strong>Pacific</strong> <strong>University</strong> NW Resident’s Conference<br />

June 4, 2012<br />

• Idiopathic, chronic dermatologic<br />

condition<br />

• Characterized by erythema of<br />

the skin<br />

• Primarily affecting skin of the<br />

cheeks, forehead, chin, and<br />

nose<br />

• Signs/symptoms vary<br />

DERMATOLOGIC FEATURES<br />

• Subtype 1<br />

• “Erythematotelangiectatic”<br />

• Often asymptomatic<br />

• Characterized by flushing (erythema) and telangiectasia<br />

DERMATOLOGIC FEATURES<br />

• Subtype 2<br />

• “Papulopustular”<br />

• Often asymptomatic, but can have burning sensation of the<br />

skin especially during exacerbations<br />

• Characterized by papules and pustules<br />

DERMATOLOGIC FEATURES<br />

• Subtype 3<br />

• “Phymatous”<br />

• ‘Phyma’ – Greek for swollen or bulbous mass<br />

• More likely to be symptomatic<br />

• Classically characterized by extreme sebaceous gland<br />

hypertrophy and rhinophyma<br />

Coursebook Page 121 of 139<br />

1


5/29/2012<br />

Gnathophyma<br />

Metophyma<br />

Otophyma<br />

TRIGGERS<br />

• Environmental factors can cause an outbreak of symptoms (taken from survey of<br />

1,066 patients by the National Rosacea Society)<br />

• Sun exposure (81%)<br />

• Emotional stress (79%)<br />

• Hot weather (75%)<br />

• Wind (57%)<br />

• Strenuous exercise (56%)<br />

• Alcohol consumption (52%)<br />

• Hot bath/shower (51%)<br />

• Others: spicy foods, hot beverages, cigarette smoke, caffeine<br />

EPIDEMIOLOGY<br />

• More common in:<br />

• Adults (acne vulgaris more common<br />

in adolescents)<br />

• Women, however usually more<br />

severe in men (phymatous rosacea<br />

seen less often in females)<br />

• Fair skin (less common in darkly<br />

pigmented races)<br />

• Northern European descent<br />

• Irish<br />

• English<br />

• Scandanavian<br />

• Dutch<br />

• German<br />

TREATMENT<br />

• Topical antibiotics<br />

• Usually erythromycin or metronidazole<br />

• Oral tetracyclines<br />

• Tetracycline or doxycycline<br />

• Surgical treatment<br />

• Typically for severe phymatous rosacea that does not respond to<br />

oral/topical therapy<br />

• Electrosurgery<br />

• Laser (CO2)<br />

• Dermabrasion<br />

Coursebook Page 122 of 139<br />

2


5/29/2012<br />

BEFORE<br />

AFTER<br />

PATHOPHYSIOLOGY – THEORIES<br />

• Climate exposure<br />

• Chemical/food exposure<br />

• Microbial trigger<br />

• Impaired iron metabolism<br />

• Affects of reactive oxygen species and free radical exposure<br />

• Vascular endothelial growth factor and other angiogenic factors<br />

• Antimicrobial peptides<br />

PATHOPHYSIOLOGY – THEORIES<br />

• Climate exposure<br />

• Chemical/food exposure<br />

• Microbial trigger<br />

• Impaired iron metabolism<br />

• Affects of reactive oxygen species and free radical exposure<br />

• Vascular endothelial growth factor and other angiogenic factors<br />

• Antimicrobial peptides<br />

CLIMATE EXPOSURE<br />

• Harsh ultraviolet exposure can cause damage to superficial<br />

blood vessels and connective tissue in the dermis<br />

• This theoretically can lead to chronic increased vascular<br />

permeability and dermatitis<br />

• Could explain why rosacea is typically seen on sun exposed<br />

areas<br />

• Sunlight is believed to be a possible trigger of outbreaks<br />

PATHOPHYSIOLOGY – THEORIES<br />

• Climate exposure<br />

• Chemical/food exposure<br />

• Microbial trigger<br />

• Impaired iron metabolism<br />

• Affects of reactive oxygen species and free radical exposure<br />

• Vascular endothelial growth factor and other angiogenic factors<br />

• Antimicrobial peptides<br />

Coursebook Page 123 of 139<br />

3


5/29/2012<br />

CHEMICAL/FOOD EXPOSURE<br />

• Spicy food, hot beverages, & alcohol known to cause<br />

exacerbations<br />

• Medications can also cause exacerbations<br />

(topical/intranasal steroids, high dose vitamin B6/B12,<br />

amiodarone)<br />

• No evidence that these are the underlying cause of the<br />

disease<br />

PATHOPHYSIOLOGY – THEORIES<br />

• Climate exposure<br />

• Chemical/food exposure<br />

• Microbial trigger<br />

• Impaired iron metabolism<br />

• Affects of reactive oxygen species and free radical exposure<br />

• Vascular endothelial growth factor and other angiogenic factors<br />

• Antimicrobial peptides<br />

MICROBIAL TRIGGER<br />

• Demodex (parasitic mites that live in & around human hair follicles)<br />

• Prefer skin of nose and cheeks<br />

• Some research shows that helper T-cell infiltration occurs adjacent<br />

to known Demodex infestation in patients with rosacea<br />

• Demodex is also found in many healthy individuals without rosacea<br />

Bonnar E, Eustace P, Powell FC. The Demodex mite population in rosacea. J Am Acad Dermatol. Mar<br />

1993;28(3):443-8.<br />

• Helicobacter pylori (bacterium associated with peptic ulcer disease)<br />

• Incidentally, patients with rosacea have been found to have higher<br />

incidence of serological evidence of H. pylori<br />

PATHOPHYSIOLOGY – THEORIES<br />

• Climate exposure<br />

• Chemical/food exposure<br />

• Microbial trigger<br />

• Impaired iron metabolism<br />

• Affects of reactive oxygen species and free radical exposure<br />

• Vascular endothelial growth factor and other angiogenic factors<br />

• Antimicrobial peptides<br />

IMPAIRED IRON METABOLISM<br />

• Iron catalyzes conversion of hydrogen peroxide to free radicals, which<br />

cause tissue injury<br />

• Unmetabolized iron is stored as ferritin<br />

• “Oxidative stress and ferritin expression in the skin of patients with<br />

rosacea.” J Am Acad Dermatol. Feb 2009<br />

• Amount of ferritin in histological skin analysis significantly higher in<br />

patients with rosacea<br />

• Higher ferritin was associated with more advanced stages of rosacea<br />

Tisma VS, Basta-Juzbasic A, Jaganjac M, et al. Oxidative stress and ferritin expression in the skin of patients with<br />

rosacea. J Am Acad Dermatol. Feb 2009;60(2):270-6<br />

PATHOPHYSIOLOGY – THEORIES<br />

• Climate exposure<br />

• Chemical/food exposure<br />

• Microbial trigger<br />

• Impaired iron metabolism<br />

• Affects of reactive oxygen species<br />

• Vascular endothelial growth factor and other angiogenic factors<br />

• Antimicrobial peptides<br />

Coursebook Page 124 of 139<br />

4


5/29/2012<br />

REACTIVE OXYGEN SPECIES<br />

• Released early in inflammatory process by<br />

neutrophils<br />

• Cause tissue damage and cause the release of<br />

inflammatory mediators from damaged cells<br />

PATHOPHYSIOLOGY – THEORIES<br />

• Climate exposure<br />

• Chemical/food exposure<br />

• Microbial trigger<br />

• Impaired iron metabolism<br />

• Affects of reactive oxygen species and free radical exposure<br />

• Vascular endothelial growth factor and other angiogenic<br />

factors<br />

• Antimicrobial peptides<br />

VEGF & ANGIOGENESIS<br />

• Studies show increased VEGF expression in skin with<br />

rosacea lesions vs. skin without rosacea lesions (within<br />

the same patient)<br />

• “Therapeutic response of rosacea to dobesilate”. Eur J<br />

Med Res. Oct 18 2005<br />

• Topical dobesilate (used in Europe) improved<br />

erythema and telangiectasia in rosacea<br />

Cuevas P, Arrazola JM. Therapeutic response of rosacea to dobesilate. Eur J Med Res.<br />

Oct 18 2005;10(10):454-6.<br />

PATHOPHYSIOLOGY – THEORIES<br />

• Climate exposure<br />

• Chemical/food exposure<br />

• Microbial trigger<br />

• Impaired iron metabolism<br />

• Affects of reactive oxygen species and free radical exposure<br />

• Vascular endothelial growth factor and other angiogenic factors<br />

• Antimicrobial peptides<br />

ANTIMICROBIAL PEPTIDES<br />

• Part of the innate immune response<br />

• Cathelicidin<br />

• Abnormally high levels in rosacea patients vs.<br />

normals<br />

• Stimulates angiogenesis and modulates expression<br />

of VEGF<br />

• When injected into mice it induces inflammation,<br />

erythema, and telangiectasia<br />

Schauber J, Gallo RL. Antimicrobial peptides and the skin immune defense system. J Allergy<br />

Clin Immunol. Aug 2008;122(2):261-6<br />

OCULAR ROSACEA (SUBTYPE 4)<br />

• Meibomian glands are sebaceous glands and<br />

are often affected by acne rosacea<br />

• Ocular rosacea is very common (prevalent in up<br />

to 50% of patients with rosacea) and very<br />

commonly ignored by patients and their doctors<br />

Coursebook Page 125 of 139<br />

5


5/29/2012<br />

FEATURES OF OCULAR ROSACEA<br />

• Mild ocular rosacea<br />

• Signs<br />

• Meibomian gland dysfunction<br />

• Lid margin telangiectasia<br />

• Reduced tear stability<br />

(decreased TBUT)<br />

• Symptoms<br />

• Can be asymptomatic<br />

• **Fluctuating vision**<br />

• Mild foreign body sensation<br />

FEATURES OF OCULAR ROSACEA<br />

• Moderate ocular rosacea<br />

• Signs<br />

• Recurrent hordeola &<br />

chalazia<br />

• Corneal disruptions<br />

• Non-central punctate<br />

epithelial erosions<br />

• Conjunctival hyperemia<br />

• Symptoms<br />

• Constant blurred vision<br />

• Persistent epiphoria<br />

• **Burning sensation**<br />

FEATURES OF OCULAR ROSACEA<br />

• Severe ocular rosacea<br />

• Signs<br />

• Severe keratitis<br />

• Coalescent PEE affecting central<br />

cornea<br />

• Corneal ulcers<br />

• Corneal edema<br />

• Corneal neovascularization<br />

• Symptoms<br />

• Blurred vision<br />

• Eye pain<br />

TREATMENT OF OCULAR ROSACEA<br />

• Mild stages<br />

• Preservative free artificial tears QID/PRN<br />

• Eyelid hygiene -- VERY important part of the management<br />

• Avoidance of triggers<br />

• Avoidance of over-the-counter medications that dry out mucous membranes<br />

• Decongestants<br />

• Anti-histamines<br />

• Avoidance of over-the-counter eye drops with preservatives<br />

• Visine and other ocular decongestants<br />

• Artificial tears with preservative<br />

EYELID HYGIENE<br />

• What is a warm compress<br />

• Temperature Not warm…you want HOT<br />

• Duration Needs to be at least 5 minutes, if not 10-15<br />

• Digital massage is essential – breaks up stagnant material in meibomian<br />

glands<br />

• Lid scrubs<br />

• Commercial preparations vs. baby shampoo<br />

• Either works fine, but warm compress with digital massage is more<br />

important<br />

• Better for anterior blepharitis, in ocular rosacea the disease process<br />

is occurring in the meibomian glands<br />

TREATMENT OF OCULAR ROSACEA<br />

• Moderate Stages<br />

• Night-time lubrication<br />

• Celluvisc or lubricating<br />

ointment qHS<br />

• Eyelid hygiene<br />

• Topical steroids for<br />

symptomatic exacerbations<br />

• Lotemax or<br />

fluorometholone<br />

• Topical cyclosporine for longterm<br />

control of inflammation<br />

Coursebook Page 126 of 139<br />

6


5/29/2012<br />

TREATMENT OF OCULAR ROSACEA<br />

• Moderate Stages<br />

• Low dose oral doxycycline<br />

• Start 50-100mg bid then taper<br />

to as low as 50mg qd or qod<br />

• Judicious use of punctal plugs<br />

• Must treat lid<br />

disease/inflammation first or<br />

else you are keeping a pool of<br />

inflammatory tears on the<br />

ocular surface<br />

• Consider referral to dermatologist<br />

depending on individual<br />

presentation and symptomology<br />

NOTES ON DOXYCYCLINE<br />

• Not appropriate for pregnant/breastfeeding women or for children<br />

• Use with caution in patients on chronic anticoagulation (coumadin)<br />

• Increases the INR, an indicator of increased bleeding risk<br />

• Primary care physician or clinical pharmacist should always be consulted<br />

• Use caution in liver/kidney disease<br />

• Consult with primary care physician in patients with complicated medical<br />

histories<br />

• Instructions<br />

• Take on empty stomach<br />

• Take separate from dairy products, calcium supplements, & iron supplements<br />

• Side effects<br />

• Photosensitivity<br />

• GI upset/diarrhea<br />

ANTI-INFLAMMATORY PROPERTIES OF<br />

DOXYCYCLINE<br />

• Inhibits interleukin-1 in cultured human corneal epithelium<br />

Solomon, A et al. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2000 Aug;41(9):2544-57.<br />

• Inhibits MMP-13 & MMP-8 in vitro<br />

Smith GN Jr et al. Arthritis Rheum. 1999 Jun;42(6):1140-6.<br />

• Accepted treatment for dermatologic manifestations of rosacea for many<br />

years<br />

RESTASIS & OCULAR ROSACEA<br />

• Cyclosporine is an immunosuppressant that is used systemically to combat<br />

rejection in organ transplants<br />

• Reduces inflammation by inhibition of T-lymphocyte activation and migration<br />

• Topical cyclcosporine (Restasis) BID shown to be more effective than<br />

artificial tears BID in some studies<br />

• Statistically significant improvement in Schirmer scores, symptoms<br />

(OSDI questionaire), tear breakup time, & corneal staining scores.<br />

Schechter B. Adv Ther (2009) 26(6)<br />

TREATMENT OF OCULAR ROSACEA<br />

• Severe Stages<br />

• Consider referral to corneal specialist<br />

• May need corneal transplantation if corneal neovascularization<br />

or ulcer causing central corneal scarring<br />

TREATMENT OF OCULAR ROSACEA<br />

• Emerging Therapy – Anti-VEGF agents<br />

• Commonly used for retinal conditions<br />

• Choroidal neovascularization<br />

• Diabetic macular edema<br />

• Cystoid macular edema associated with retinal vascular<br />

occlusions<br />

• Now being used in subconjunctival injection by<br />

ophthalmologists to induce recession of neovascular vessels<br />

in the cornea and increase chances of successful corneal<br />

grafts<br />

Coursebook Page 127 of 139<br />

7


5/29/2012<br />

FUNCTIONAL TREATMENT FOR ADVANCED<br />

CASES<br />

• Modest magnification<br />

• Increased add power with proper education<br />

• Low power hand held magnifiers<br />

• Low power Optivisor for hands-free near<br />

tasks<br />

• **Glare Control**<br />

• These patients will be VERY light sensitive<br />

• Wrap-around tint<br />

• Gray/Plum for bright days<br />

• Amber/Yellow for cloudy days<br />

Benayoun Y et al. “Effects of Subconjunctival Bevacizumab on Corneal<br />

Neovascularization: Results of a Prospective Study.” Cornea, online ahead of print 2012.<br />

CASE PRESENTATION – A LESSON TO BE<br />

LEARNED<br />

• 9/23/2011 – Portland VAMC Optometry Clinic<br />

• 57yo white male, presenting for consult from PCP for baseline<br />

DM exam (recently diagnosed)<br />

• CC: Decreased vision and eye pain, both gradually progressing<br />

for 3 months<br />

• Eyes feel very dry and scratchy, and pain is constant and sharp,<br />

especially on blink<br />

• Vision “foggy”, like “looking through water”<br />

• LEE: August 2010<br />

OCULAR HISTORY<br />

• Chronic dry eye syndrome secondary to ocular rosacea and ectropion<br />

• Chronic ocular allergies<br />

• Refractive error & presbyopia<br />

• Ocular Medications<br />

• PFAT several times daily<br />

• Cromolyn sodium QID OU<br />

• FML once daily OU (ran out several months ago)<br />

MEDICAL HISTORY<br />

• Recently diagnosed type 2 diabetes mellitus<br />

• Last A1c: 13.4<br />

• Patient taking metformin, reports recent improvement in home blood glucose levels since<br />

starting<br />

• Depression/anxiety associated with post-traumatic stress disorder<br />

• Chronic allergies<br />

• HTN/HLD/CAD<br />

• Systemic medications<br />

• Oral doxycycline (for ocular rosacea)<br />

• Oral antihistamine qd<br />

• Oral anti-depressant<br />

• Metformin<br />

• Lisinopril/Simvastatin/Metoprolol<br />

INITIAL FINDINGS<br />

• Visual Acuity (with correction)<br />

OD: 20/200 PH 20/150<br />

OS: 20/100+2 PH 20/70<br />

• Pupils ERRL, no APD noted OD or OS<br />

• Visual field FTFC OD & OS<br />

• EOM intact OU, no additional pain on movement<br />

Coursebook Page 128 of 139<br />

8


5/29/2012<br />

ANTERIOR SEGMENT FINDINGS<br />

CORNEA OS 20/100 (20/70 BCVA)<br />

• External: (+)flushed cheeks & prominent blood vessels on cheeks/forehead/nose<br />

• Lids/Lashes:<br />

• Significant meibomian gland stasis on digital expression<br />

• Severe lid margin telangiectasia<br />

• Generalized erythema with prominent eyelid fullness<br />

• Very poor lower eyelid snapback<br />

• Conjunctiva: significant, diffuse conjunctival injection 360<br />

• Cornea<br />

CORNEA OD 20/200 (20/150 BCVA)<br />

ASSESSMENT:<br />

1. Extensive Corneal Neovascularization OD>OS related to multifactorial ocular surface<br />

disease<br />

Coursebook Page 129 of 139<br />

9


5/29/2012<br />

TREATMENT<br />

• Pred Forte QID OU<br />

• Cyclosporine BID OU<br />

• PFAT q1hr OU<br />

• Celluvisc qHS OU<br />

• Eyelid hygiene BID OU<br />

• d/c Cromolyn sodium<br />

• Oral NSAID for pain<br />

• Avoid oral antihistamine<br />

• Referral to Cornea Clinic<br />

LESSONS<br />

• Something that is common and often relatively benign (like<br />

ocular rosacea) with the right circumstances & factors can<br />

cause vision loss and blindness<br />

• Early treatment is key because advanced ocular rosacea is very<br />

challenging to control<br />

Coursebook Page 130 of 139<br />

10


5/29/2012<br />

Benjamin Taylor, OD<br />

White City VA SORCC<br />

• 59 year old Caucasian male presented to clinic for his<br />

annual diabetic eye exam<br />

• Patient complaints were:<br />

• 1. Blurred vision at distance<br />

• 2. For the last year he has been noticing “stars” in his<br />

peripheral vision 2‐3 times a week, greater in the left eye.<br />

He reported that this generally lasted for 5‐10 minutes<br />

but never lasted more than an hour and then would just<br />

fade away.<br />

• Type II Diabetes<br />

• Last A1c‐‐>6.7<br />

• Congestive Heart Failure<br />

• Patient has pacemaker<br />

• Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease<br />

• Sleep Apnea<br />

• Anemia secondary to kidney failure<br />

• Hyperlipidemia<br />

• Cholesterol‐‐>205<br />

• LDL‐‐>could not be accurately calculated because triglycerides were<br />

greater than 400<br />

• HDL‐‐>29<br />

• Triglycerides‐‐>674<br />

• Hyperuricemia<br />

• Albuterol<br />

• Carvedilol<br />

• Digoxin<br />

• Furosemide<br />

• Glipizide<br />

• Hydralazine HCl<br />

• Omeprazole<br />

• Simvastatin<br />

• Valsartan<br />

• Warfarin—patient reported starting this just two months<br />

earlier<br />

• Visual Acuities without Correction<br />

• OD: 20/40<br />

• OS: 20/25+2<br />

• Pupils: errl, (‐)apd ou<br />

• EOM’s: full/no restrictions<br />

• CVF: ftfc od, os<br />

• Cover Test: orthophoria at 6m<br />

• Refraction<br />

• OD: +0.50‐1.50x079 VA: 20/20<br />

• OS: plano‐1.00x085 VA: 20/20‐1<br />

• Add +2.50 20/20 OU<br />

• Slit lamp findings<br />

• Lids/Lashes: Mild Meibomian capping<br />

• Conjunctiva: Pinguecula OU<br />

• Cornea: Clear OU<br />

• Anterior Chamber: Deep and Quiet OU<br />

• Iris: Normal OU, (‐)NVI OU<br />

• Lens: 1+ NS OU, trace ACC OU<br />

• Intraocular Pressure<br />

• OD: 15mmHg<br />

• OS: 16mmHg<br />

Coursebook Page 131 of 139<br />

1


5/29/2012<br />

• C/D Ratio<br />

• OD: 0.45v/0.40h<br />

• OS: 0.35 round, flame shaped hemorrhage on inferior temporal rim<br />

• Blood Vessels<br />

• Mild tortuosity, (‐)venous engorgement<br />

• Posterior Pole<br />

• OD: one blot heme inf/temp at the edge of arcades<br />

• OS: two large blot hemes superior to the macula within 1DD with<br />

foveal thickening. Extensive blot hemes all 4 quadrants throughout<br />

the arcades.<br />

• Macular thickening OU per OCT<br />

• Periphery<br />

• OD: few scattered mid‐peripheral blot hemes<br />

• OS: extensive mid‐peripheral blot hemes all 4 quadrants<br />

• (‐)holes, tears, retinal detachments OU<br />

• Assessment/<strong>Differential</strong>s<br />

• Central Retinal Vein Occlusion OS<br />

• Diabetic Retinopathy with possible CSME<br />

• Asymmetric OS>OD<br />

• Carotid Occlusive Disease secondary to greater hemorrhaging<br />

in the left eye<br />

• Warfarin induced retinopathy OS<br />

• Since patient recently started this medication 2 months earlier<br />

• Plan<br />

• Patient was sent to lab for ProtimeINR<br />

• Ordered Carotid Doppler Ultrasound<br />

• Also placed consult to Portland VAMC for fluorescein<br />

angiography<br />

• ProtimeINR came back slightly low at 1.9<br />

• Carotid Ultrasound results were estimated to have 90‐<br />

99% stenosis for both the right and left internal<br />

carotid arteries<br />

Coursebook Page 132 of 139<br />

2


5/29/2012<br />

• Patient then decided not to pursue further optometric<br />

testing until the stenosis was addressed<br />

• VA Physician referred patient to local Vascular<br />

Surgeon<br />

• Patient chose to pursue<br />

bilateral carotid<br />

endarterectomy done by<br />

a local vascular surgeon<br />

in Medford. The left side<br />

first on 11/16/2011 then<br />

the right on 12/28/2011.<br />

http://www.primehealthchannel.com/carotid‐endarterectomy.html<br />

• After endarterectomies patient was referred to local<br />

Ophthalmologist in Medford for a fluorescein<br />

angiography<br />

• Results are as follows:<br />

Taken 1/11/2012 Taken 10/31/2011<br />

Coursebook Page 133 of 139<br />

3


5/29/2012<br />

• Window defect associated<br />

with pigmentary change in<br />

drusen<br />

• One fine microaneurysm<br />

without leakage<br />

• The left side had multiple<br />

microaneurysms in the<br />

temporal macula and<br />

periphery without<br />

significant leakage.<br />

• There was also blockage<br />

from dot and blot<br />

hemorrhages.<br />

• There was no significant<br />

filling delay of the choroid<br />

or retina for either eye.<br />

• Probable ocular ischemic syndrome, left eye<br />

• Non‐proliferative diabetic retinopathy, left eye greater<br />

than right<br />

• History of carotid occlusive disease status post<br />

bilateral carotid endarterectomy<br />

• Cataracts<br />

• The patient was placed under observation and was<br />

scheduled for follow up with Ophthalmology in 3<br />

months.<br />

• Patient was seen again on 4/23/2012 and the findings<br />

below were described by the Ophthalmologist:<br />

• The right retinal periphery has one or two small<br />

intraretinal hemorrhages. In the left periphery, there<br />

are several intraretinal hemorrhages in each of the four<br />

quadrants of the periphery. This represents a significant<br />

decrease in hemorrhages from when I last saw him in<br />

January.<br />

• Epidemiology<br />

• Average age of 65 years, rare before 50<br />

• Men affected 2x more than women<br />

• No racial predilection<br />

• Bilateral involvement in approximately 22% of cases<br />

• 7.5 cases per 1 million people per year<br />

• May be an underestimation as OIS may be misdiagnosed as<br />

other vascular diseases<br />

• 29% of patients with Symptomatic carotid occlusion<br />

manifest retinal vascular changes that are usually<br />

Asymptomatic, and 1.5% of them per year will progress<br />

to symptomatic OIS<br />

• Pathogenesis<br />

• OIS develops primarily in patients<br />

with poor collateral circulation<br />

between the internal and external<br />

carotid arteries or between the two<br />

internal carotid arteries<br />

• People with well developed<br />

collateral circulation may not<br />

develop OIS even with total<br />

occlusion of the internal carotid<br />

artery<br />

• Those with poor collateral<br />

circulation can develop OIS with<br />

less than 50% stenosis of the<br />

internal carotid artery<br />

http://medicaldictionary.thefreedictionary.com/_/viewer.aspxpath=mosbyC<br />

AM&name=500069‐fx30.jpg<br />

Coursebook Page 134 of 139<br />

4


5/29/2012<br />

• Symptoms: patients may have the following<br />

complaints<br />

• Vision Loss<br />

• Can be described as loss of vision anywhere from suddenly to<br />

gradually over the course of a month<br />

• Pain<br />

• Patients will sometimes describe it as a dull, constant ache in<br />

the affected eye. Dull pain also felt over the orbit, upper face,<br />

and temple. This pain may worsen when patient is upright.<br />

• Lying down either can relieve or lessen the pain.<br />

• Episcleral Injection<br />

http://www.aafp.org/afp/2002/0915/p991.html<br />

• Corneal Edema<br />

• Rubeosis Iridis<br />

• Can lead to:<br />

• Hyphema<br />

• Neovascular Glaucoma<br />

http://arapaho.nsuok.edu/~fulk/kanski.html<br />

• Iridocyclitis<br />

• Lead to anterior or<br />

posterior synechiae<br />

• Other Anterior Segment findings:<br />

• Corneo‐scleral Melting<br />

• Iris Atrophy<br />

• Fixed semi‐dilated or sluggish pupil<br />

• Uveal Ectropion<br />

• Asymmetric Cataract<br />

http://disorders.eyes.arizona.edu/disorders/corneal‐dystrophycongenital‐endothelial‐1<br />

http://www.musculoskeletalnetwork.com/rheumatoidarthritis/content/article/1145622/1517642<br />

Coursebook Page 135 of 139<br />

5


5/29/2012<br />

• Cherry Red Spot<br />

• Neovascularization of the disc<br />

http://content.lib.utah.edu/cdm4/item_viewer.phpCISOROO<br />

T=/EHSL‐WFH&CISOPTR=850<br />

http://www.southcoasteye.com/whatsnew.html<br />

• Choroidal Neovascular<br />

Membrane<br />

• Cholesterol Emboli<br />

• Hollenhorst Plaque<br />

http://www.kenteyesurgery.co.uk/a‐z‐of‐eyes‐view.php/amd‐‐<br />

‐age‐related‐macular‐degeneration<br />

• Dilated Retinal Veins<br />

• Narrowed Retinal Arteries<br />

http://www.aao.org/theeyeshaveit/optic‐fundus/hollenhorstplaque.cfm<br />

http://content.lib.utah.edu/cdm4/item_viewer.phpCISOROOT=/EHSL‐<br />

WFH&CISOPTR=524<br />

• Other Posterior Segment Findings<br />

• Retinal hemorrhages<br />

• More prominent in the mid‐periphery<br />

• Microaneurysms<br />

• Macular capillary telangiectasia<br />

• Retinal arteriovenous communication<br />

• Cotton‐wool spots<br />

• Neovascularization elsewhere<br />

• Vitreous Hemorrhage<br />

• Spontaneous Retinal Arterial Pulsations<br />

• Anterior Ischemic Optic Neuropathy<br />

Coursebook Page 136 of 139<br />

6


5/29/2012<br />

• <strong>Differential</strong> <strong>Diagnosis</strong><br />

• Diabetic Retinopathy and Central Retinal Vein<br />

Occlusion are the two most likely conditions to be<br />

confused with OIS<br />

• One way to differentiate is light digital pressure on the eyelid.<br />

Doing this on eyes with OIS will induce retinal arterial<br />

pulsations. (Ophthalmodynamometry)<br />

• Diabetic retinopathy may coexist with OIS.<br />

• It is recommended that those patients with unilateral<br />

retinopathy or large asymmetry of retinopathy be examined<br />

for carotid occlusive disease<br />

• Systemic Associations<br />

• A study by Mizener et al in 1988 of 32 patients showed<br />

the following associated systemic diseases<br />

• Diabetes mellitus (56%)<br />

• Hypertension (50%)<br />

• Coronary Artery Disease (38%)<br />

• Previous Cerebral Infarction or Transient Ischemic Attack<br />

(31%)<br />

• The study also showed that OIS was the initial<br />

manifestation of carotid occlusive disease in 69% of the<br />

patients.<br />

• Other Systemic Associations with OIS:<br />

• Giant Cell Arteritis<br />

• Aortic Arch Syndrome<br />

• Takayasu Arteritis<br />

• <strong>Diagnosis</strong> techniques<br />

• Fluorescein Angiography<br />

• Indocyanine Green Angiography<br />

• Electroretinography<br />

• Visual‐Evoked Potentials<br />

• Ophthalmodynamometry<br />

• Ocular Plethysmography<br />

• Imaging Methods<br />

• Carotid Duplex Ultrasound<br />

• Color Doppler Imaging of Retrobulbar Vessels<br />

• Magnetic Resonance Angiography<br />

• Carotid Arteriography<br />

• Fluorescein Angiography<br />

• Delayed choroidal filling time<br />

• Staining of the retinal vessels<br />

• Indocyanine Green Angiography<br />

• Delayed choroidal filling time<br />

• Slow filling of the watershed zones of the choroid<br />

• Electroretinography<br />

• The a wave corresponds to photoreceptor activity<br />

• The b wave corresponds to bipolar cells<br />

• OIS results in decreased amplitude of a and b waves<br />

• Visual‐Evoked Potentials<br />

• Recovery time after photostress is prolonged in patients<br />

whom have severe carotid artery stenosis<br />

Coursebook Page 137 of 139<br />

7


5/29/2012<br />

• Ophthalmodynamometry<br />

• Used to estimate the pressure in the<br />

Ophthalmic Artery, approximately at the<br />

origin of the Central Retinal Artery.<br />

• Apply pressure to globe to increase IOP, when<br />

artery pulsations are observed this reflects<br />

the ophthalmic artery diastolic pressure.<br />

• In OIS the Central Retinal Artery perfusion<br />

pressure is low meaning less pressure is<br />

necessary for artery pulsations to appear.<br />

• Ocular Plethysmography<br />

• Measures indirectly the Ophthalmic Artery pressure by<br />

recording variations in the size and volume of the eye or<br />

ocular pulsations<br />

• http://bjo.bmj.com/content/87/3/361.2.full<br />

• Imaging Methods<br />

• Carotid Duplex Ultrasound<br />

• Probably will be most ordered diagnostic test by Optometrist<br />

when OIS is suspected<br />

• Color Doppler Imaging of Retrobulbar Vessels<br />

• Magnetic Resonance Angiography<br />

• Carotid Arteriography<br />

• Management<br />

• Carotid Endarterectomy<br />

• http://www.youtube.com/watchv=8rPwO‐093Lo<br />

• Carotid Artery Stenting<br />

• http://www.youtube.com/watchv=6nyNLQUUmOQ&feature=related<br />

• Study from the New England Journal of Medicine called the CREST trial<br />

• 4 year rate of stroke or death was 6.4% with stenting and 4.7% with<br />

endarterectomy.<br />

• The overall results of this study showed that stenting and endarterectomy were<br />

associated with similar primary composite outcomes<br />

• Periprocedural stroke<br />

• Myocardial infarction<br />

• Death and subsequent ipsilateral stroke<br />

• Stroke was more likely after stenting and myocardial infarction was more likely<br />

after endarterectomy. Also worth noting was that younger patients had slightly<br />

fewer problems after stenting and older patients had fewer problems after<br />

endarterectomy<br />

• Management Continued<br />

• Treatment is directed toward control of anterior segment<br />

inflammation, retinal ischemia, increased IOP and<br />

neovascular glaucoma<br />

• Topical Therapy<br />

• Steroid<br />

• Cycloplegic<br />

• Beta blockers<br />

• Alpha Agonists<br />

• Prostaglandins should be avoided because they can increase ocular<br />

inflammation<br />

• When neovascular glaucoma develops surgery or<br />

cycloablation is often needed<br />

• Trabeculectomy with antimetabolites<br />

• Aqueous shunt implants or diode laser cyclophotocoagulation<br />

• Management Continued<br />

• Panretinal Photocoagulation may be effective in some<br />

patients with ocular neovascularization caused from carotid<br />

occlusive disease<br />

• PRP caused regression of iris neovascularization in 36% of the<br />

treated eyes<br />

• Intravitreal Anti VEGF has been used to treat iris<br />

neovascularization and macular edema<br />

• 2 cases reported by Amselem et al of Intravitreal Avastin injection<br />

when carotid endarterectomy was contraindicated<br />

• One week after injection there was a regression of NVI in both cases<br />

and at three months there was no NVI<br />

• One case had a recurrence of NVI at 4 months and was reinjected<br />

and at seven months remained without NVI<br />

Coursebook Page 138 of 139<br />

8


5/29/2012<br />

• Conclusion<br />

• Signs and symptoms of carotid artery occlusive disease<br />

may occur before cerebrovascular and cardiovascular<br />

complications. As a result, optometrists may be the first<br />

to deal with patients suffering from carotid artery<br />

occlusive disease and should be aware of the clinical<br />

presentation of OIS.<br />

• Amselem L, Montero J, et al. Intravitreal Bevacizumab (Avastin) Injection in Ocular<br />

Ischemic Syndrome. American Journal of Ophthalmology 2007;144:122‐124.<br />

• Brott T, Hobson R, et al. Stenting versus Endarterectomy for Treatment of Carotid‐Artery<br />

Stenosis. The New England Journal of Medicine 2010;363(1):11‐23<br />

• Brown GC, Magargal LE. The ocular ischemic syndrome. Clinical, fluorescein<br />

angiographic and carotid angiographic features. Int Ophthalmol. 1988;11 (4):239‐51<br />

• Cohen R, Padilla J, et al. Carotid artery occlusive disease and ocular manifestations:<br />

Importance of identifying patients at risk. Optometry (2010)81, 359‐363.<br />

• Ferguson G, Eliasziw M, et al. The North American Symptomatic Carotid<br />

Endarterectomy Trial: Surgical Results in 1415 patients. Stroke, Journal of the American<br />

Heart Association 1999, 30: 1751‐1758.<br />

• Groschel K, Ernemann U, et al. Incidence and risk factors for medical complications after<br />

carotid artery stenting. Journal of Vascular Surgery 2005; 42: 1101‐1107.<br />

• McCullough H, Reinert C, et al. Ocular findings as predictors of carotid artery occlusive<br />

disease: Is carotid imaging justified Journal of Vascular Surgery 2004; 40: 279‐286.<br />

• Mendrinos E, Machinis T, Pournaras C. Ocular Ischemic Syndrome. Survey of<br />

Ophthalmology 2010; 55(1): 2‐34.<br />

Coursebook Page 139 of 139<br />

9

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!