Using Plants to Improve Flood Management - Floodplain Management

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Mannings Coefficient vs Reynolds Number Rose and Blackberry Manning's n 0.16 0.14 0.12 0.10 0.08 Blackberry(Mar) Blackberry(Apr) Blackberry(May) Willow (March) Willow (April) Willow (May) Mule Fat (Oct-Nov) Mule Fat (Nov-Dec) Mule Fat (January) Mule Fat (February) Bare Soil Wildrose#1(Jun) Wildrose#2(Jun) Wildrose#3(Jul) Linear (Blackberry(Mar)) Linear (Blackberry(Apr)) Linear (Blackberry(May)) Linear (Wildrose#1(Jun)) Linear (Wildrose#2(Jun)) Linear (Wildrose#3(Jul)) 0.06 0.04 0.02 0.00 0 100,000 200,000 300,000 400,000 500,000 600,000 700,000 Re
Erosion Summary Erosion (in) 3 Bare soil 2 mulefat 1 rose willow 1 3 5 Velocity (ft/sec)
Page 1 and 2: Roughness of Floodplain Plants Usin
Page 3 and 4: Plants have roughness
Page 5 and 6: We measure roughness using Mannings
Page 7 and 8: Type of Channel and Description Min
Page 9 and 10: O’Connor Lakes, Star Bend Lots of
Page 11: Mulefat Wild Rose Sandbar willow Ca
Page 14 and 15: Velocity measurement locations in a
Page 16 and 17: STREAMBED BARE SOIL SAMPLE PREPARAT
Page 18 and 19: Sandbar Willow 3 rd replicate
Page 20 and 21: Velocity Profile Sandbar Willow 5 4
Page 22 and 23: Roughness Coefficient vs Reynolds N
Page 24 and 25: Comparative Roughness: Mulefat & Sa
Page 26 and 27: Roughness coefficients vs Reynolds
Page 31 and 32: Swim Response to Sandbar Willow ○

Using Plants to Improve Flood Management - Floodplain Management

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?