03.01.2015 Views

CER Letter to Minister Shabangu re MPRDA s49 - 1 Feb 2011

CER Letter to Minister Shabangu re MPRDA s49 - 1 Feb 2011

CER Letter to Minister Shabangu re MPRDA s49 - 1 Feb 2011

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Chrissiesmeer, Mpumalanga (Pho<strong>to</strong>: Ursula Francke)<br />

5. Proposed <strong>re</strong>strictions<br />

Below we propose <strong>re</strong>strictions for prospecting and mining in a<strong>re</strong>as of biodiversity and hydrological<br />

importance not included in the proposal for prohibitions above.<br />

Note that this section is based on the assumption that the Minerals and Petroleum Resources<br />

Development Amendment Act, 2008 (Act 49 of 2008) will not come in<strong>to</strong> effect in its cur<strong>re</strong>nt form. We<br />

continue our call that Act 49 of 2008 be brought in<strong>to</strong> effect as promulgated and assented <strong>to</strong> by the<br />

P<strong>re</strong>sident. The application of Chapter 5 of the National Environmental Management Act, 1998<br />

(NEMA), 20 the 2010 EIA Regulations and the Listing Notices published under the 2010 EIA<br />

Regulations will add<strong>re</strong>ss many of the issues that the <strong>re</strong>strictions in this section attempt <strong>to</strong> add<strong>re</strong>ss.<br />

However, should Act 49 of 2008 be brought in<strong>to</strong> effect or <strong>re</strong>promulgated in an amended form, <strong>to</strong> the<br />

extent that the <strong>re</strong>strictions proposed below a<strong>re</strong> not captu<strong>re</strong>d in NEMA and the EIA <strong>re</strong>gulations<br />

published the<strong>re</strong>under, we ask that the <strong>re</strong>strictions below still be conside<strong>re</strong>d for implementation, either<br />

by inclusion in further legislative amendments or by way of a guideline for the implementation of the<br />

<strong>MPRDA</strong> and/or NEMA, whe<strong>re</strong> appropriate.<br />

5.1. Geographical a<strong>re</strong>as <strong>to</strong> which <strong>re</strong>strictions must apply<br />

It is proposed that the <strong>re</strong>strictions described in 5.2 below apply <strong>to</strong> the geographical a<strong>re</strong>as listed<br />

below. For clarity, the geographical a<strong>re</strong>as below a<strong>re</strong> not proposed for complete prohibition for<br />

prospecting and mining. Instead, we propose a set of procedural <strong>re</strong>strictions aimed at improving<br />

the quality of decision-making on applications for prospecting and mining rights in these a<strong>re</strong>as:<br />

20 Act 107 of 1998

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!