04.01.2015 Views

An Invitation to Random Schr¨odinger operators - FernUniversität in ...

An Invitation to Random Schr¨odinger operators - FernUniversität in ...

An Invitation to Random Schr¨odinger operators - FernUniversität in ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

PROOF (Lemma) :<br />

We def<strong>in</strong>e ˜Λ L = {i ∈ Λ L | (L − 1) ≤ || i|| ∞ ≤ L }<br />

˜Λ L consists of the two outermost layers of Λ L .<br />

The values u(n) of an eigenfunction u of H ω with H ω u = λu can be computed<br />

from the eigenvalue equation for all n ∈ Λ L once we know its values on ˜Λ L . So,<br />

the dimension of χ ΛL (V λ ) is at most the number of po<strong>in</strong>ts <strong>in</strong> ˜Λ L .<br />

□<br />

35<br />

5.2. Boundary conditions.<br />

Boundary conditions are used <strong>to</strong> def<strong>in</strong>e differential opera<strong>to</strong>rs on sets M with a<br />

boundary. A rigorous treatment of boundary conditions for differential opera<strong>to</strong>rs is<br />

most conveniently based on a quadratic form approach (see [115]) and is out of the<br />

scope of this review. Roughly speak<strong>in</strong>g boundary conditions restrict the doma<strong>in</strong><br />

of a differential opera<strong>to</strong>r D by requir<strong>in</strong>g that functions <strong>in</strong> the doma<strong>in</strong> of D have<br />

a certa<strong>in</strong> behavior at the boundary of M. In particular, Dirichlet boundary conditions<br />

force the functions f <strong>in</strong> the doma<strong>in</strong> <strong>to</strong> vanish at ∂M. Neumann boundary<br />

conditions require the normal derivative <strong>to</strong> vanish at the boundary. Let us denote<br />

by −∆ D M and −∆N M<br />

the Laplacian on M with Dirichlet and Neumann boundary<br />

condition respectively.<br />

The def<strong>in</strong>ition of boundary conditions for the discrete case are somewhat easier<br />

then <strong>in</strong> the cont<strong>in</strong>uous case. However, they are presumably less familiar <strong>to</strong> the<br />

reader and may look somewhat technical at a first glance. The reader might therefore<br />

skip the details for the first read<strong>in</strong>g and concentrate of ‘simple’ boundary conditions<br />

def<strong>in</strong>ed below. Neumann and Dirichlet boundary conditions will be needed<br />

for this text only <strong>in</strong> chapter 6 <strong>in</strong> the proof of Lifshitz tails.<br />

For our purpose the most important feature of Neumann and Dirichlet boundary<br />

conditions is the so called Dirichlet-Neumann bracket<strong>in</strong>g . Suppose M 1 and M 2<br />

are disjo<strong>in</strong>t open sets <strong>in</strong> R d and M = (M 1 ∪ M 2 ) ◦ , ( ◦ denot<strong>in</strong>g the <strong>in</strong>terior) then<br />

−∆ N M 1<br />

⊕ −∆ N M 2<br />

≤ −∆ N M ≤ −∆ D M ≤ −∆ D M 1<br />

⊕ −∆ D M 2<br />

. (5.24)<br />

<strong>in</strong> the sense of quadratic forms. In particular the eigenvalues of the opera<strong>to</strong>rs <strong>in</strong><br />

(5.24) are <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g from left <strong>to</strong> right.<br />

We recall that a bounded opera<strong>to</strong>r A on a Hilbert space H is called positive (or<br />

positive def<strong>in</strong>ite or A ≥ 0) if<br />

〈ϕ, A ϕ〉 ≥ 0 for all ϕ ∈ H . (5.25)<br />

For unbounded A the validity of equation 5.25 is required for the (form-)doma<strong>in</strong><br />

of A only.<br />

By A ≤ B for two opera<strong>to</strong>rs A and B we mean B − A ≥ 0.<br />

For the lattice case we <strong>in</strong>troduce boundary conditions which we call Dirichlet and<br />

Neumann conditions as well. Our choice is guided by the cha<strong>in</strong> of <strong>in</strong>equalities(5.24).

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!