04.01.2015 Views

VME 2100 Apr 02 PDF - VITA Technologies

VME 2100 Apr 02 PDF - VITA Technologies

VME 2100 Apr 02 PDF - VITA Technologies

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

avoid multiplicative overflow. Equation 11 gives the time domain<br />

response of the filter, where the order of the filter is q+1. Figure<br />

3 shows the unity gain frequency response of the filter.<br />

Given a pulse repetition frequency, only a small range of Doppler<br />

frequencies can be resolved at that sampling rate. Aliasing in the<br />

MTI filter will periodically stopband at integer multiples of the<br />

sample rate any incoming Doppler signal at that frequency. These<br />

periodic ambiguous rejection stopbands are known as blind<br />

speeds. Pulse-to-pulse staggering eliminates use of feedback to<br />

improve the blind speed response, thereby avoiding the stability<br />

issues of IIR filters. Staggering can be described as cascaded<br />

interpolation and decimation filter stages. Sample rate conversion<br />

maintains detection of targets by scaling the frequency domain<br />

spectrum envelope into the passband of the MTI filter. Low frequency<br />

components are not significantly scaled, so they always<br />

fall in the stopband of the MTI filter. Figure 4 illustrates a fourthorder<br />

response with varying stagger schedules compared to the<br />

uniform sampled filter response. Many stagger ratios have been<br />

described by other researchers on this topic, and they are dependent<br />

on the order of the filter. Those shown in Figure 4 use 10-<br />

20 percent increases in subsequent sampling intervals. A good<br />

stagger ratio can result in only a 10 dB loss of signal in the blind<br />

speed zones while maintaining the low-frequency stopband.<br />

Dynamic Clutter Pulse Cancellers<br />

Clutter-locked MTI uses a measured average Doppler shift of a<br />

given volume of clutter that is used to control an offset frequency<br />

oscillator that shifts clutter into the rejection notch. The first stage of<br />

the process is to take the complex conjugate of the synchronous<br />

detected signal to obtain a symmetric weight distribution in the<br />

completed derivation. Both h 1 and h 2 in Figure 5 are high-pass FIR<br />

transfer functions as defined by Equations 10 and 11 and can have<br />

any order as needed. The frequency oscillator performs a down con-<br />

dB<br />

0<br />

-10<br />

Order<br />

2<br />

3<br />

4<br />

5<br />

-20<br />

-30<br />

-40<br />

0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5<br />

Figure 3. MTI high-pass filter response vs. normalized frequency<br />

f<br />

f<br />

pr<br />

dB<br />

0<br />

Stagger Ratio 1<br />

Stagger Ratio 2<br />

Stagger Ratio 3<br />

Stagger Ratio 4<br />

No Stagger<br />

-20<br />

-40<br />

-60 0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3<br />

Figure 4. MTI fourth-order HPF response with stagger vs. normalized frequency<br />

f<br />

f<br />

pr<br />

Reprinted from <strong>VME</strong>bus Systems / <strong>Apr</strong>il 20<strong>02</strong><br />

Copyright 20<strong>02</strong> / <strong>VME</strong>bus Systems

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!