05.01.2015 Views

Traffic Accidents Investigation preview.pdf - Thomson Reuters

Traffic Accidents Investigation preview.pdf - Thomson Reuters

Traffic Accidents Investigation preview.pdf - Thomson Reuters

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

140<br />

<strong>Traffic</strong> accidents<br />

investigation, analysis and<br />

reconstruction<br />

updated by<br />

G Rechnitzer B Eng (Hons), M Eng Sc, PhD, MIEAust, CPEng,<br />

FSIA, MSAEA<br />

S Richardson B Eng (Mech), MSc (MVT), MIEAust, MSAEA<br />

A Short BA (Physics), MSc, BMED, D Phil (Oxon)<br />

T Orton B S Mechanical Engineering [UCSB]<br />

[Updating authors, Update 46, December 2008]<br />

by<br />

G Rechnitzer B Eng (Hons), M Eng Sc<br />

J Lenard B Eng (Hons), MA<br />

W Keramidas B App Sc, BA<br />

[Original authors]<br />

© 2008THOMSONREUTERS<br />

140 - 51<br />

Update: 46


EXPERT EVIDENCE<br />

The views expressed in this work are those of the authors.<br />

Although considerable care has been taken in regard to ensuring the accuracy of<br />

the work presented, the responsibility for the correct use, interpretation and<br />

verification of accuracy of any materials used must rest with the user.<br />

© 2008THOMSONREUTERS<br />

140 - 52<br />

Expert Evidence


Author information<br />

Dr George Rechnitzer is a partner and Principal Forensic Engineer with Delta-V<br />

Experts International Pty Ltd (see www.dvexperts.net) a Forensic Engineering and<br />

Safety Solutions consultancy. He has extensive experience in the application of the<br />

engineering sciences to safety in many areas including road safety, crashworthiness of<br />

all vehicle types, occupational health and safety, accident and incident investigation<br />

and reconstruction, analysis and countermeasure development for injury prevention. Dr<br />

Rechnitzer was a Senior Research Fellow at the Monash University Accident Research<br />

Center for some 12 years, and has carried out major projects for the Australian<br />

Defence Force, Vic Roads, Federal Office of Road Safety, Victorian Work Cover<br />

Authority and the Victorian Occupational Health and Safety Commission. He has also<br />

carried out a number of in-depth investigations for the State Coroner; consultancies on<br />

vehicle safety related projects for BHP, Australia Post, SECV and the Australian<br />

Industrial Relations Commission, amongst others. Dr Rechnitzer provides expert<br />

evidence for litigation cases in Australia and the USA, and his work has been published<br />

extensively with over 80 publications including contributing chapters in books relating<br />

to traffic accidents, accident investigation and reconstruction; and has made<br />

presentations at over 60 conferences and seminars, both nationally and at international<br />

forums.<br />

Dr Rechnitzer graduated in 1971 from Monash University with a Bachelor of<br />

Engineering (Civil) (Hons), has a Master Engineering Science degree from Melbourne<br />

University (1979), and a PhD from Monash University (2003). He is a Member of the<br />

Institution of Engineers and Sociey of Automotive Engineers, a Fellow of the Safety<br />

Institute of Australia and is Chair of its National Technical Panel.<br />

Dr Rechnitzer may be contacted at:<br />

Principal Forensic Engineer<br />

DVExperts International<br />

377 St Georges Road<br />

FITZROY NORTH VIC 3068<br />

AUSTRALIA<br />

Telephone: +61 (0)3 9481 2200<br />

Mobile +61 (0)418 998 158<br />

Fax + 61 (0)3 9481 2277<br />

Email: grechnitzer@dvexperts.net<br />

Website: http://www.dvexperts.net<br />

Shane Richardson is a partner and Principal Forensic Engineer with Delta-V Experts<br />

International Pty Ltd (see www.dvexperts.net) a Forensic Engineering and Safety<br />

Soultions consultancy. Shane has provided expert evidence in the Supreme, County<br />

and Magistrates Courts related to collision/incident investigations for rollover collisions,<br />

heavy equipment, tram collisions, boat collisions, vehicle dynamics, collision damage,<br />

crashworthiness, lines of sight, motorcycle collisions, bicycle collisions, pedestrian<br />

collisions, human impact, ballistics and vehicle data recorders. Shane is a Mechanical<br />

Engineer with 20 years experience in applying systems engineering methods to the<br />

procurement, specifications development, and design of automotive, military,<br />

mechanical and safety systems. Shane evaluated technical integrity issues such as:<br />

design, documentation, drawings, systems of work, maintenance and reliability and<br />

investigated equipment faults and failures.<br />

He has published national and international technical papers, and is currently<br />

© 2008THOMSONREUTERS<br />

140 - 53<br />

Update: 46


EXPERT EVIDENCE<br />

completing his PhD within the Civil Engineering Department, Monash University. The<br />

focus of his research thesis is Roll Over Protection Systems for 4x4 vehicles.<br />

Mr Richardson may be contacted at:<br />

DVExperts International<br />

377 St Georges Road<br />

FITZROY NORTH VIC 3068<br />

AUSTRALIA<br />

Telephone: +61 (0)3 9481 2200<br />

Mobile +61 (0)409 011 362<br />

Fax + 61 (0)3 9481 2277<br />

Email: srichardson@dvexperts.net<br />

Website: http://www.dvexperts.net<br />

Dr Andrew Short has been publishing, researching and practising in the area of<br />

biomechanics since 1995 and specialises in the application of statistical methods to<br />

establish the probability of injury in reported circumstances.<br />

Dr Short graduated from Trinity College Dublin (BA in Physics) and received<br />

scholarships to attend Imperial College London (MSc in Engineering and Physical<br />

Sciences in Medicine) and Oxford University where he received a Doctorate in<br />

Engineering Science, has spent two years as a Research Fellow at the Accident<br />

Research Centre, Monash University, where he conducted projects relating to arm<br />

fracture, serious spinal and head injury and developed strong industry links for<br />

investigating novel injury prevention devices. Dr Short is the Lecturer in cellular and<br />

tissue biomechanics at the University of Melbourne.<br />

Dr Short is a consutant biomechanics engineer and provides expert reports on cases<br />

of personal injury. These cases include determination of injury outcomes in the<br />

reported or reconstructed circumstances of a vehicle collision. Dr Short has specific<br />

skills in comparing injury outcomes for persons wearing and then not wearing a<br />

seatbelt and the reconstruction of pedestrian impacts where the standard throw<br />

distance calculations do not apply (MADYMO).<br />

In addition, Dr Short provides rounded, statistical, holistic and biomechanically sound<br />

analysis of work processes.<br />

Dr Short may be contacted at:<br />

Biomechanics Engineer<br />

DVExperts International<br />

377 St Georges Road<br />

FITZROY NORTH VIC 3068<br />

AUSTRALIA<br />

Telephone: +61 (0)3 9481 2200<br />

Mobile +61 (0)415984519<br />

Fax + 61 (0)3 9481 2277<br />

Email: ashort@dvexperts.net<br />

Website: http://www.dvexperts.net<br />

Tia Orton completed her Bachelor of Science Degree in Mechanical Engineering at the<br />

University of California in Santa Barbara (UCSB). While at UCSB, Tia held the coveted<br />

position of Undergraduate Teaching Assistant for Mechanical Engineering Drafting &<br />

Design. Following an internship at General Motors, Tia opted for a career in the field of<br />

independent transportation safety research with Safety Analysis and Forensic<br />

© 2008THOMSONREUTERS<br />

140 - 54<br />

Expert Evidence


Engineering (SAFE), a leading US automotive safety research firm.<br />

Throughout her six-year term at SAFE, Tia became extremely proficient in automotive<br />

crashworthiness analysis, research and litigation support. Tia’s work at SAFE included<br />

extensive analysis, testing and research related to vehicle rollover and other crash<br />

types. Much of the ground-breaking research that Tia encountered at SAFE was<br />

conducted by DVExperts International, leading to Tia taking a position working for<br />

DVExperts in Australia in October 2006.<br />

Since joining DVExperts, Tia has worked on many different cases ranging from car,<br />

motorcycle, truck and bus collisions, pedestrian impacts, rollovers, and structural and<br />

road design. Tia has also authored numerous peer-reviewed technical publications and<br />

has presented research to the US National Highway <strong>Traffic</strong> Safety Administration<br />

(NHTSA) on various subjects related to vehicle design.<br />

Ms Orton may be contacted at:<br />

DVExperts International<br />

377 St Georges Road<br />

FITZROY NORTH VIC 3068<br />

AUSTRALIA<br />

Telephone: +61 (0)3 9481 2200<br />

Fax + 61 (0)3 9481 2277<br />

Email: torton@dvexperts.net<br />

Website: http://www.dvexperts.net<br />

DVExperts is a forensic engineering and safety solutions company specializing in<br />

accident investigation and reconstruction, failure analysis, road safety, vehicle<br />

crashworthiness, workplace safety and safety solutions.<br />

© 2008THOMSONREUTERS<br />

140 - 55<br />

Update: 46


EXPERT EVIDENCE<br />

OVERVIEW ..................................................................................................................... [140.10]<br />

Accident reconstruction ..................................................................................................... [140.50]<br />

<strong>Traffic</strong> accident statistics for Australia ............................................................................... [140.90]<br />

Road safety – Historic trends ................................................................................ [140.100]<br />

Biomechanics in collisions............................................................................................... [140.140]<br />

Occupant motion in frontal collisions............................................................................... [140.180]<br />

Injury biomechanics in collisions ..................................................................................... [140.220]<br />

Crash test dummies and associated computer models ........................................ [140.230]<br />

Pedestrians in collisions .................................................................................................. [140.270]<br />

Injury criteria and tolerance levels for serious injury....................................................... [140.310]<br />

Crashworthiness and Australian design rules and standards......................................... [140.340]<br />

RECONSTRUCTION TECHNIQUES<br />

1.1 Introduction ........................................................................................................... [140.380]<br />

1.2 Crash scene ......................................................................................................... [140.400]<br />

1.3 Damaged vehicles ................................................................................................ [140.440]<br />

1.4 Tyre marks<br />

1.4.1 Introduction ................................................................................................... [140.460]<br />

1.4.2 Rolling prints ................................................................................................. [140.470]<br />

1.4.3 Skid marks .................................................................................................... [140.480]<br />

1.4.4 Scuff marks................................................................................................... [140.490]<br />

1.4.5 Friction and the tyre-road interaction............................................................ [140.510]<br />

1.5 Estimation of speed from skid marks................................................................... [140.550]<br />

1.5.1 Limitations..................................................................................................... [140.560]<br />

1.5.2 Accuracy ....................................................................................................... [140.570]<br />

1.6 Estimation of speed from yaw marks................................................................... [140.590]<br />

1.6.1 Determing the yaw radius............................................................................. [140.600]<br />

1.6.2 Limitations..................................................................................................... [140.610]<br />

1.6.3 Accuracy ....................................................................................................... [140.620]<br />

1.7 Measurement of friction........................................................................................ [140.640]<br />

1.7.1 Vehicle test skids .......................................................................................... [140.650]<br />

1.7.2 Limitations..................................................................................................... [140.660]<br />

1.7.3 Test skids using accelerometers................................................................... [140.670]<br />

1.7.4 Drag tyre and drag sled................................................................................ [140.680]<br />

1.7.5 The British portable skid resistance tester ................................................... [140.690]<br />

1.7.6 Friction values from tables............................................................................ [140.700]<br />

1.8 Leaps, flips and vaults<br />

1.8.1.1 Estimation of speed ................................................................................... [140.740]<br />

1.8.1.2 Limitations.................................................................................................. [140.750]<br />

1.8.1.3 Accuracy .................................................................................................... [140.760]<br />

1.9 Exterior vehicle damage ..................................................................................................<br />

1.9.1 Introduction ................................................................................................... [140.780]<br />

1.9.2 Structural performance ................................................................................. [140.790]<br />

1.9.3 Collision type ................................................................................................ [140.800]<br />

1.9.4 Crush profile ................................................................................................. [140.810]<br />

1.9.5 Estimation of speed from vehicle damage ................................................... [140.820]<br />

1.10 Interior vehicle inspection ..............................................................................................<br />

1.10.1 Seat belt use............................................................................................... [140.840]<br />

1.10.2 Intrusion ...................................................................................................... [140.860]<br />

1.11 Mechanisms of injury .....................................................................................................<br />

1.11.1 Signs of contact .......................................................................................... [140.890]<br />

1.11.2 Occupant motion and mechanisms of injury .............................................. [140.900]<br />

1.11.3 Other ........................................................................................................... [140.910]<br />

1.12 Computers and software .................................................................................... [140.930]<br />

1.13 Documentation.................................................................................................... [140.950]<br />

Case histories................................................................................................................ [140.1000]<br />

1.14 Civil cases ........................................................................................................ [140.1020]<br />

1.14.1 Train and truck, level crossing collision.................................................... [140.1020]<br />

1.14.2 Pedestrian impact ..................................................................................... [140.1030]<br />

1.14.3 Motorcycle and car collision ..................................................................... [140.1040]<br />

© 2008THOMSONREUTERS<br />

140 - 56<br />

Expert Evidence


TABLE OF CONTENTS<br />

1.15 Culpable driving................................................................................................ [140.1070]<br />

1.15.1 Two vehicle head on collision................................................................... [140.1070]<br />

APPENDIX 1: SYMBOLS AND GLOSSARY OF TERMS................................. [140.1100]<br />

APPENDIX 2: PERCEPTION AND REACTION TIME....................................... [140.1200]<br />

APPENDIX 3: FORCES AND LAWS OF MOTION ............................................ [140.1300]<br />

FIGURES..................................................................................................................... [140.1640]<br />

Authors’ Preface<br />

It has been over 10 years since the original chapter was written. It was motivated by the need<br />

for a much stronger foundation of science and engineering principles in the presentation of<br />

expert evidence in courts and tribunals for transport involved collisions.<br />

Since that time much has progressed in terms of road safety improvements [vehicle<br />

crashworthiness advances, road infrastructure investments and road rules and enforcement]. On<br />

the other hand the basic physics and engineering principles have, of course, not changed and<br />

thus the fundamentals of what we present in this updated chapter are retained, although we<br />

hope made clearer, with revisions added by Shane Richardson, Dr Andrew Short and Ms Tia<br />

Orton.<br />

Importantly the authors wish to acknowledge that this Chapter also owes its genesis in part to<br />

two of the previous co-authors Mr William Keramidas and Mr Jim Lenard.<br />

We have provided new case examples taken from the large number of cases we have done over<br />

the last few years. Dr Andrew Short has provided additional information on injury mechanism<br />

and biomechanics relating to collisions.<br />

We hope that this primer aimed at the legal fraternity, will be read by all who are involved in<br />

transport accidents and collisions. We welcome any feedback or queries, with contact details<br />

provided at the end of the Chapter.<br />

Please Note: The views expressed in this work are those of the authors. Although considerable<br />

care has been taken in regard to ensuring the accuracy of the work presented, the<br />

responsibility for the correct use, interpretation and verification of accuracy of any materials<br />

used must rest with the user.<br />

[The next text page is 140-1051]<br />

© 2008THOMSONREUTERS<br />

140 - 57<br />

Update: 46


EXPERT EVIDENCE<br />

© 2008THOMSONREUTERS<br />

140 - 58<br />

Expert Evidence


OVERVIEW<br />

[140.10] The many thousands of collisions which occur in Australia each year give rise to<br />

many actions, from property insurance claims, medical treatment, compensation claims,<br />

criminal charges for culpable driving, coronial inquests, product liability and other legal<br />

actions, road safety research and so on. The list is large. At the heart of many of these actions<br />

is the need to establish, as clearly and accurately as possible, particular and relevant details<br />

potentially relating to any phase of the incident. The result of the approximately 160,000<br />

tow-away crashes in Australia each year is around 1,600 fatalities and 46,000 serious injuries.<br />

Typical questions include, “How fast was the vehicle travelling”, “What was in its path”,<br />

“What action was taken by the driver”, “Who was driving”, “How did the vehicle design<br />

perform in terms of crashworthiness”, “How did the vehicles impact”, “How was the<br />

occupant injured” and so forth. Queries come from a host of interested parties, including<br />

insurance companies, police, coroners, road safety researchers, Federal and State regulatory<br />

authorities, vehicle owners, vehicle manufacturers and, of course, lawyers. The reasons for the<br />

queries can range from road safety research programs, product liability litigation, to driving<br />

prosecutions and insurance claims.<br />

<strong>Traffic</strong> accident reconstruction is aimed at providing the answers, if possible, to these<br />

questions.<br />

This chapter provides an introduction to the science of traffic accident investigation: analysis<br />

and reconstruction; current methodologies, procedures and limitations; expertise required; and<br />

questions for vetting expert witnesses. It is not intended – nor is it possible in the space<br />

available – to be a treatise on the subject, but it can provide those concerned with traffic<br />

accidents with a brief background and insight into what can be done, what information is<br />

needed and what questions need to be considered.<br />

With the great advances in techniques of computer analysis and graphic presentation, it is<br />

perhaps more important than ever not to confuse technical sophistication with accuracy and<br />

quality. Sophisticated technology may merely transform poor-quality data and analysis into<br />

impressive-looking but still poor-quality results. It is our objective to encourage the full and<br />

effective use of modern accident investigation techniques and also to sharpen the focus on<br />

ensuring that expert opinions, procedures and results are subject to due and appropriate<br />

scrutiny.<br />

Whilst experts can present technical reports and argue their position in Court, our experience is<br />

that lawyers, barristers, judges must also become more conversant with the principles outlined<br />

in this chapter. It remains a difficult and challenging exercise to present succinctly such science<br />

based material in court, where the science rather than the impression of science must be<br />

properly explained and completely understood by decision makers. This then leads to the<br />

further need for effective cross examination of experts based on a better understanding of the<br />

principles outlined in this Chapter. Thus our work as experts can often lose its full impact<br />

without the partnership of a technically well-informed legal team. Perhaps this is rather<br />

obvious; nonetheless it is vital that it is always recognised.<br />

Please refer to the appendices to this chapter in order to fully understand the explanations<br />

given below:<br />

Appendix 1: Symbols and Glossary of Terms<br />

© 2008THOMSONREUTERS<br />

140 - 1051<br />

Update: 46


[140.10] EXPERT EVIDENCE<br />

Appendix 2: Perception and Reaction time<br />

Appendix 3: Forces and Laws of Motion<br />

Appendix 4: Figures<br />

[The next text page is 140-1551]<br />

© 2008THOMSONREUTERS<br />

140 - 1052<br />

Expert Evidence

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!