06.01.2015 Views

The State of Food and Agriculture 2010-11: Women in ... - FAO

The State of Food and Agriculture 2010-11: Women in ... - FAO

The State of Food and Agriculture 2010-11: Women in ... - FAO

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

142<br />

Malawi: school attendance, school progress,<br />

<strong>and</strong> children’s health. PhD dissertation, College<br />

<strong>of</strong> Agricultural Sciences, <strong>The</strong> Pennsylvania <strong>State</strong><br />

University, USA.<br />

Naved, R.T. 2000. Intra-household impact <strong>of</strong> the<br />

transfer <strong>of</strong> modern agricultural technology:<br />

a gender perspective. <strong>Food</strong> Consumption <strong>and</strong><br />

Nutrition Division Discussion Paper No. 85,<br />

Wash<strong>in</strong>gton, DC, IFPRI.<br />

Newman, C. 2002. Gender, time use, <strong>and</strong> change:<br />

the impact <strong>of</strong> the cut flower <strong>in</strong>dustry <strong>in</strong><br />

Ecuador. <strong>The</strong> World Bank Economic Review,<br />

16(3): 375–396.<br />

OECD (Organisation for Economic Co-operation<br />

<strong>and</strong> Development). <strong>2010</strong>. <strong>The</strong> OECD Social<br />

Institutions <strong>and</strong> Gender Index (available at<br />

http://www.oecd.org/document/39/0,3343,<br />

en_2649_33935_42274663_1_1_1_1,00.html).<br />

OECD-<strong>FAO</strong>. <strong>2010</strong>. OECD-<strong>FAO</strong> Agricultural Outlook:<br />

<strong>2010</strong>–2019. Paris, OECD, <strong>and</strong> Rome, <strong>FAO</strong>.<br />

Okali, C. & Mims, J. 1998. Gender <strong>and</strong> smallholder<br />

dairy production <strong>in</strong> Tanzania. Report to the<br />

Livestock Production Programme <strong>of</strong> the<br />

United K<strong>in</strong>gdom Department for International<br />

Development (DFID), Appendixes 1 <strong>and</strong> 2,<br />

pp. 37–38.<br />

Okello, V. 2005, <strong>The</strong> Upesi rural stoves project.<br />

Boil<strong>in</strong>g Po<strong>in</strong>t, 51: 1–5.<br />

Oladeebo, J.O. & Fajuyigb, A.A. 2007. Technical<br />

efficiency <strong>of</strong> men <strong>and</strong> women upl<strong>and</strong> rice<br />

farmers <strong>in</strong> Osun <strong>State</strong>, Nigeria. Journal <strong>of</strong><br />

Human Ecology, 22(2): 93–100.<br />

Ongaro, W.A. 1990. Modern maize technology,<br />

yield variations <strong>and</strong> efficiency differentials: a<br />

case <strong>of</strong> small farms <strong>in</strong> Western Kenya. Eastern<br />

Africa Economic Review, 6(1): <strong>11</strong>–29.<br />

Ouma, J.O., De Groote, H. & Owuor, G. 2006.<br />

Determ<strong>in</strong>ants <strong>of</strong> improved maize seed <strong>and</strong><br />

fertilizer use <strong>in</strong> Kenya: policy implications.<br />

Embu, Kenya, Agricultural Research Institute;<br />

Nairobi, International maize <strong>and</strong> Wheat<br />

improvement Centre; <strong>and</strong> Njoro, Kenya,<br />

Egerton University.<br />

P<strong>and</strong>olfelli, L., Me<strong>in</strong>zen-Dick, R. & Dohrn, S. 2008.<br />

Gender <strong>and</strong> collective action: motivations,<br />

effectiveness, <strong>and</strong> impact. Journal <strong>of</strong><br />

International Development, 20(1), 1–<strong>11</strong>.<br />

Paris, T.R. & Chi, T.T.N. 2005. <strong>The</strong> impact <strong>of</strong> row<br />

seeder technology on women labor: a case<br />

study <strong>in</strong> the Mekong Delta, Vietnam. Gender<br />

Technology <strong>and</strong> Development, 9: 157–184.<br />

Pasquet, P. & Koppert, G. 1993. Activity patterns<br />

<strong>and</strong> energy expenditure <strong>in</strong> Cameroonian<br />

tropical forest populations. In C.M. Hladik,<br />

A. Hladik, O.F. L<strong>in</strong>ares, H. Pagezy, A. Semple<br />

& M. Hadley. Tropical forests, people <strong>and</strong> food:<br />

biocultural <strong>in</strong>teractions <strong>and</strong> applications to<br />

development. Man <strong>and</strong> the Biosphere Series,<br />

13. Paris, UNESCO, <strong>and</strong> Carnforth, USA, <strong>The</strong><br />

Parthenon Publish<strong>in</strong>g Group.<br />

Pasquet, P. & Koppert, G. 1996. Budget-temps<br />

et dépense énergétique chez les essarteurs<br />

forestiers du Cameroun. In C.M. Hladik,<br />

A. Hladik, H. Pagezy, O.F. L<strong>in</strong>ares, G. Koppert<br />

& A. Froment, eds. L’alimentation en forêt<br />

tropical: Interactions bioculturelles et<br />

perspectives de développement. L’Homme et la<br />

Biosphère. Paris, UNESCO.<br />

Peterman, A., Quisumb<strong>in</strong>g, A. & Behrman, J.<br />

<strong>2010</strong>. Review <strong>of</strong> empirical evidence on gender<br />

differences <strong>in</strong> non-l<strong>and</strong> agricultural <strong>in</strong>puts,<br />

technology, <strong>and</strong> services <strong>in</strong> develop<strong>in</strong>g<br />

countries. Background paper prepared for<br />

<strong>The</strong> <strong>State</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Food</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Agriculture</strong> <strong>2010</strong>–<strong>11</strong>.<br />

Rome, <strong>FAO</strong>.<br />

Peters, P.E. 1986. Household management <strong>in</strong><br />

Botswana: cattle, crops, <strong>and</strong> wage labor. In<br />

J.L. Moock, ed. Underst<strong>and</strong><strong>in</strong>g Africa’s rural<br />

households <strong>and</strong> farm<strong>in</strong>g systems. Boulder, USA,<br />

<strong>and</strong> London, Westview.<br />

Pitt, M.M. & Kh<strong>and</strong>ker, S.R. 1998. <strong>The</strong> impact<br />

<strong>of</strong> group based credit programs on poor<br />

households <strong>in</strong> Bangladesh: does the gender<br />

<strong>of</strong> participants matter Journal <strong>of</strong> Political<br />

Economy, 106(5): 958–996.<br />

Pitt, M.M., Kh<strong>and</strong>ker, S.R. & Cartwright, J.<br />

2006. Empower<strong>in</strong>g women with micro<br />

f<strong>in</strong>ance: evidence from Bangladesh. Economic<br />

Development <strong>and</strong> Cultural Change, 54(4):<br />

791–831.<br />

Porter, G. & Phillips-Howard, K. 1997. Contract<br />

farm<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> South Africa: a case study from<br />

Kwazulu-Natal. Geography: Journal <strong>of</strong> the<br />

Geographical Association, 82(3&4): 1–38.<br />

Quisumb<strong>in</strong>g, A.R. 1995. Gender differences <strong>in</strong><br />

agricultural productivity: a survey <strong>of</strong> empirical<br />

evidence. FCND Discussion Paper No. 5.<br />

Wash<strong>in</strong>gton, DC, IFPRI.<br />

Quisumb<strong>in</strong>g, A.R. 1996. Male–female differences<br />

<strong>in</strong> agricultural productivity: methodological<br />

issues <strong>and</strong> empirical evidence. World<br />

Development, 24(10): 1579–1595.<br />

Quisumb<strong>in</strong>g, A. & Maluccio, J. 2000.<br />

Intrahousehold allocation <strong>and</strong> gender relations:<br />

new empirical evidence from four develop<strong>in</strong>g<br />

countries. Wash<strong>in</strong>gton, DC, IFPRI.<br />

Quisumb<strong>in</strong>g, A.R. & Otsuka, K. 2001a. L<strong>and</strong><br />

<strong>in</strong>heritance <strong>and</strong> school<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> matril<strong>in</strong>eal<br />

societies: evidence from Sumatra. World<br />

Development, 29(12): 2093–2<strong>11</strong>0.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!