07.01.2015 Views

in Zimbabwe - OCHANet

in Zimbabwe - OCHANet

in Zimbabwe - OCHANet

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Project budget: US$2,000,000. Amount received from CERF: US$300,000<br />

USG<br />

Approval:<br />

14 Mar 11<br />

LOU<br />

signed:<br />

21 Mar 11<br />

Funds<br />

disbursed:<br />

29 Mar 11<br />

Proposal<br />

submitted:<br />

17 Feb 11<br />

F<strong>in</strong>al<br />

proposal:<br />

7 Mar 11<br />

CO notified<br />

of grant<br />

approval:<br />

10 Mar 11<br />

Funds recd<br />

<strong>in</strong>-country:<br />

29 Mar 11<br />

Funds to<br />

partner:<br />

See table<br />

below<br />

ISL project<br />

implementation:<br />

1 Apr 11<br />

NRC project<br />

implementation:<br />

1 Apr 11<br />

M&E: 1 June 11<br />

Implement<br />

ation due<br />

to<br />

complete:<br />

31 Dec 11<br />

IOM Grant 11‐IOM‐007: Fund<strong>in</strong>g to Partners<br />

First disbursement Second Disbursement Balance due<br />

NGO Date Amount Date Amount Date Amount<br />

Integrated Susta<strong>in</strong>able Livelihoods 26 May 2011 $5,000 27 June 2011 $60,287.20 $ 53,180.48<br />

Norwegian Refugee Council 27 May 2011 $5,000 $113,704.00<br />

GRANT 11‐IOM‐014 (RR)<br />

Project title: Emergency Rehabilitation Assistance to Storm Affected Schools.<br />

Geographical areas targeted with CERF fund<strong>in</strong>g: Gokwe North, Gokwe South, Mberengwa, Chip<strong>in</strong>ge, Buhera, Bulilima and Nkayi<br />

Project budget: US$9,100,000. Amount received from CERF: US$977,054<br />

As noted <strong>in</strong> the report, education cluster members identified this project as a priority, follow<strong>in</strong>g a number of storms and floods that resulted <strong>in</strong> the<br />

destruction of school <strong>in</strong>frastructure. IOM was later on requested to take on the project, on behalf of the education cluster. Several fund<strong>in</strong>g options were<br />

discussed, after which it was decided to seek CERF support, either through the UFE or RR w<strong>in</strong>dow (as agencies were discuss<strong>in</strong>g the 2011 first UFE round at<br />

about the same time). At that po<strong>in</strong>t an <strong>in</strong>itial draft of the project proposal was drawn up, which identified an expected implementation period of 8 months.<br />

The nature of the <strong>in</strong>tervention was later deemed more <strong>in</strong> l<strong>in</strong>e with RR eligibility criteria, and OCHA requested IOM to reduce the implementation period to<br />

3 months, <strong>in</strong> l<strong>in</strong>e with the LoU applicable at the time (though the umbrella LoU <strong>in</strong>creased the timeframe for RR projects to 6 months shortly afterwards).<br />

www.p2pt.org.uk Review of Value Added of CERF <strong>in</strong> <strong>Zimbabwe</strong> Page | 40

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!