07.01.2015 Views

The difference between an LC and suretyship undertaking; Can one ...

The difference between an LC and suretyship undertaking; Can one ...

The difference between an LC and suretyship undertaking; Can one ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>LC</strong> Law Summit NY 22 October 2010<br />

9 – 9:45 Non Extension Notices: Form, Procedure, & St<strong>an</strong>dard of Adequacy<br />

B<strong>an</strong>k of Nova Scotia v. Williamson, [2009] ONCA 754 (Ont. C.A. Nov. 2 2009) [C<strong>an</strong>.]; Board of<br />

Supervisers of Fairfax Cty, Va v. Burke & Herbert B&T Co.; Fifth Third B<strong>an</strong>k v. Kohl’s Ind. L.P.; Old<br />

Republic Surety Co. v. Quad City B<strong>an</strong>k &Trust; International-Matex T<strong>an</strong>k Terminals v. Chemical<br />

B<strong>an</strong>k, 2010 WL 2219366 (W.D.Mich. Oct.5, 2009); <strong>an</strong>d ISP98 Model Form 3. Should there be a<br />

Model Form<br />

9:45 – 10:30 C<strong>an</strong>adi<strong>an</strong>, US, <strong>an</strong>d Other <strong>LC</strong> Cases of Note Part I<br />

<strong>The</strong> <strong>difference</strong> <strong>between</strong> <strong>an</strong> <strong>LC</strong> <strong>an</strong>d <strong>suretyship</strong> <strong>undertaking</strong>; C<strong>an</strong> <strong>one</strong> claim the entire<br />

amount of the <strong>LC</strong> as Damages Highl<strong>an</strong>d Produce Ltd. v. Egg Farmers of C<strong>an</strong>ada,<br />

[2010] F.C. 401 [C<strong>an</strong>ada].<br />

Malpractice Claim against Beneficiary/Debtor’s General Counsel for Advice (or lack)<br />

regarding Drawing under Perform<strong>an</strong>ce St<strong>an</strong>dby. In re Central Illinois, 2010 B<strong>an</strong>kr.<br />

LEXIS 1814 (C.D. Ill. June 16 2010)<br />

<strong>The</strong> ability of <strong>an</strong> <strong>LC</strong> issuer to take a security interest in the goods fin<strong>an</strong>ced by the <strong>LC</strong> <strong>an</strong>d<br />

exercise it while refusing payment on the <strong>LC</strong>: Nareerux Import Co. v. C<strong>an</strong>adi<strong>an</strong> Imperial B<strong>an</strong>k of<br />

Commerce, [2009] ONCA 764 [C<strong>an</strong>ada] compared to SewChez Int’l Ltd v. CIT Group.<br />

Universal Stainless Steel & Alloys Inc. v. J.P. Morg<strong>an</strong> Chase B<strong>an</strong>k, [2009] CarswellOnt 7015,<br />

ONCA 801 (C<strong>an</strong>.) [C<strong>an</strong>ada].<br />

Breach of a sales contract to provide <strong>an</strong> <strong>LC</strong>: What if the Beneficiary fails to make a complying<br />

presentation Seattle Iron & Metals Corp, v. Xie, 2010 WL 1875390 (Wash. Ct. App. May 10<br />

2010); Ad<strong>an</strong>i Exports Limited v. AMCI Export Corp., 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 88969 (W.D. Pa.<br />

Dec. 4, 2007); UCC Section 2-325.<br />

An Injunction to Prevent Disbursal of the Proceeds of Fraud <strong>an</strong>d <strong>an</strong> <strong>LC</strong> Obligation: Eam L<strong>an</strong>d<br />

Services, Inc. v. Ideal Mortgage B<strong>an</strong>kers, Ltd, 2010 WL 237906.<br />

10:30 – 11 BREAK<br />

11-12:30 <strong>LC</strong> Cases Part II<br />

Structured <strong>LC</strong>s <strong>an</strong>d their fallout: Cargill Fin<strong>an</strong>cial Services International v. B<strong>an</strong>k of Fin<strong>an</strong>ce <strong>an</strong>d<br />

Credit Ltd., 14 N.Y.3d 853 (N.Y. App. Div. 2010); Fortis B<strong>an</strong>k v. Adib B<strong>an</strong>k, Index No.<br />

601948109 (N.Y. Sup. Ct.).<br />

Disclosure of confidential information in a participation/syndication: Foster Poultry Farms, Inc.<br />

v. Sun Trust B<strong>an</strong>k, 2010 WL 1735035 (9 th Cir. Mar. 19, 2010).


<strong>The</strong> Phenomenon of Fraudulent <strong>LC</strong>s: H<strong>an</strong>sen v. PT B<strong>an</strong>k Negara Ind<strong>one</strong>sia (Persero) TBK,<br />

601 F.3d 1059 (10th Cir. 2010).<br />

Arbitration in the Underlying Contract <strong>an</strong>d its Impact on <strong>LC</strong> Obligations: BHP Billiton Petroleum<br />

(Americas) Inc. v. Atl<strong>an</strong>ta Offshore Ltd., 312 S.W.3d 813 (Tex. App. 2009).<br />

Recent Chinese <strong>LC</strong> & Guar<strong>an</strong>tee Cases<br />

12:30 – 1:15 LUNCH<br />

1:15 – 1:45 <strong>LC</strong> Proceeds Where the Applic<strong>an</strong>t, Beneficiary, or Both are Not Counter‐Parties<br />

167086 C<strong>an</strong>ada Inc. v. GMAC Commercial Fin<strong>an</strong>ce Corp., [2009] O.J. 1986 QUICKLAW (O.S.C.J. May 14,<br />

2009) [C<strong>an</strong>ada]; Arthur Schum<strong>an</strong>, Inc. v. B<strong>an</strong>co S<strong>an</strong>t<strong>an</strong>der Brasil, 2010 WL 891647 (D.N.J. Mar. 10,<br />

2010).<br />

1:45 – 2:15 Suretyship Discharge Defenses as Post‐Honor Claims<br />

CRM Collateral II Inc. v. Tri‐County Metropolit<strong>an</strong> Tr<strong>an</strong>sportation District of Oregon, 2010 WL 2175994 (D.<br />

Or. May 26 2010).<br />

2:15 – 2:45 Nominated B<strong>an</strong>k Reimbursement Rights Under UCP600: <strong>The</strong> Saga of China New Era<br />

China New Era Int’l Ltd. v. B<strong>an</strong>k of China (H.K.) Ltd., [2009] HKCU 2012 (Hong Kong Court of<br />

First Inst<strong>an</strong>ce) [Hong Kong] <strong>an</strong>d its reversal by the Hong Kong Court of Appeal on 22 July 2010; Fortis<br />

B<strong>an</strong>k v. Indi<strong>an</strong> Overseas B<strong>an</strong>k, [2010] EWHC 84 (Comm) [Engl<strong>an</strong>d].<br />

2:45 – 3 BREAK<br />

3 – 3:30 Replacing St<strong>an</strong>dbys or Dem<strong>an</strong>d Guar<strong>an</strong>tees Which Have Expired or are to be Issued by<br />

Another Issuer<br />

3:30 – 4 Limitations <strong>an</strong>d Expiration: Statutes & Rules<br />

Alhadeff v. Merid<strong>an</strong> on Baintree Isl<strong>an</strong>d, L<strong>LC</strong>, 220 P.3d 1214 (2009) [USA]; B<strong>an</strong>k of Nova Scotia v.<br />

Williamson, [2009] ONCA 754 (Ont. C.A. Nov. 2 2009) [C<strong>an</strong>.]; MBF Insur<strong>an</strong>s Sdn Bhd v. Lembaga<br />

Penyatu<strong>an</strong> & Pemulih<strong>an</strong> T<strong>an</strong>ah Persekutu<strong>an</strong>, [2007] MLJU 0625 (Ct. App. Putrajaya) [Malaysia]; B<strong>an</strong>k<br />

of China, Ltd. V. C.G.S. (Group) Pty. Ltd, [2009] NSWSC 397[Australia]; Rev. UCC Section 5-115;<br />

Section 15 of the C<strong>an</strong>adi<strong>an</strong> Limitations Act [2002].<br />

4 – 4:30 Open Forum<br />

4:30 COCKTAIL RECEPTION

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!