07.01.2015 Views

women panchayat memb.. - Volunteers for Rural India

women panchayat memb.. - Volunteers for Rural India

women panchayat memb.. - Volunteers for Rural India

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Table 1 reveals that more than 55%<br />

sarpanches belonged to a joint family<br />

system and 45% to a nuclear family<br />

system. Most of the panches belonged<br />

to a joint family (43%) or a nuclear family<br />

(37%).These findings are in con<strong>for</strong>mity<br />

with the findings of the Kachhwa<br />

(2003).<br />

Annual income<br />

The majority of Sarpanches belonged to<br />

the medium income group (35%) followed<br />

by low income group (30%).Only 15%<br />

belonged to the high Income group. The<br />

majority of panches belonged to the lowincome<br />

group (48.75%) followed by<br />

medium income group (21.25%) and high<br />

category of income (12.3%).<br />

Mass Media Exposure<br />

Table 1 shows that most sarpanches had<br />

a low level of mass media exposure (65%)<br />

followed by medium level of mass media<br />

exposure (20%). Only 15% had a high<br />

level of mass media exposure. Most<br />

panches had a low level of mass media<br />

exposure (67.5%), followed by medium<br />

level of mass media exposure (26.28%).<br />

Less than 10% panches had a high level<br />

of mass media exposure (6.25%).This<br />

finding is in con<strong>for</strong>mity with the findings of<br />

Sentthamarai et al. (1997).<br />

Urban contact<br />

Table 1 indicates that most sarpanches<br />

had a low level of urban contact (90%)<br />

followed by medium level (10%).None<br />

were found in the high level of urban<br />

contact. Most panches had a low level of<br />

urban contact (57.5%) followed by<br />

medium level (36.25%) and only 6.25%<br />

with a high level of urban contact.<br />

Social participation<br />

The majority of sarpanches were <strong>memb</strong>ers<br />

of one organization (70%) followed<br />

by no participation category (15%) and<br />

more than one organization category<br />

(10%). Only 5% were found in the<br />

category office bearer. Most panches<br />

were <strong>memb</strong>ers of one organization (70%)<br />

followed by no participation category<br />

(13.25%) and more than one organization<br />

category (8.75%). Only 5% panches were<br />

office bearers. The finding is in<br />

accordance with the findings of<br />

Senthamarai et al. (1997).<br />

Association of the personal variables<br />

with the per<strong>for</strong>mance level of<br />

<strong>women</strong> <strong>panchayat</strong> <strong>memb</strong>ers<br />

In order to measure the association of<br />

per<strong>for</strong>mance level of <strong>women</strong> <strong>panchayat</strong><br />

<strong>memb</strong>ers and related<br />

independent variables, the chi-square test<br />

was computed and results have been<br />

presented in Table 2.<br />

Table 2. Association of the selected independent variables with the per<strong>for</strong>mance level<br />

of <strong>women</strong> <strong>panchayat</strong> <strong>memb</strong>ers<br />

N=100<br />

S. No.<br />

Independent variables Chi-square (x 2 )<br />

1. Age 4.37*<br />

2. Education 7.39**<br />

3. Caste 1.25 NS<br />

4. Family Type 9.5**<br />

5. Income 0.13 NS<br />

6. Mass Media Exposure 9.13**<br />

7. Social participation 9.52**<br />

8. Urban contact 7.45*<br />

International Journal of <strong>Rural</strong><br />

vol. 16 no. 1 April 2009<br />

Studies (IJRS)<br />

ISSN 1023–2001 www.ivcs.org.uk/IJRS Article 8 Page 3 of 5

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!