07.01.2015 Views

Fund liquidation, self-selection and look-ahead bias in the hedge ...

Fund liquidation, self-selection and look-ahead bias in the hedge ...

Fund liquidation, self-selection and look-ahead bias in the hedge ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

over <strong>the</strong> entire sample period, mov<strong>in</strong>g forward by one quarter at <strong>the</strong><br />

peated<br />

<strong>and</strong> adjust<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> sample by <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> funds that have a sufficiently<br />

time<br />

return history. <strong>Fund</strong>-of-funds are excluded to avoid double count<strong>in</strong>g.<br />

long<br />

avoid backfill<strong>in</strong>g <strong>bias</strong>, returns are only used <strong>in</strong> this exercise if <strong>the</strong> fund<br />

To<br />

hasahistoryofatleastfourquarters.<br />

of all, <strong>in</strong> order to prevent spurious performance persistence patterns<br />

First<br />

are due to <strong>look</strong>-<strong>ahead</strong> <strong>bias</strong> (see, e.g. Carpenter <strong>and</strong> Lynch, 1999),<br />

that<br />

apply <strong>the</strong> correction method as <strong>in</strong>troduced by ter Horst, Nijman <strong>and</strong><br />

we<br />

we repeat <strong>the</strong> analysis of Baquero, ter Horst<br />

Basically,<br />

Verbeek (2005) by multiply<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> performance measure (e.g. average<br />

<strong>and</strong><br />

over <strong>the</strong> rank<strong>in</strong>g period) with a estimated weight factor ŵ 1,it which is<br />

return<br />

ratio of an unconditional non-<strong>liquidation</strong> probability <strong>and</strong> a conditional<br />

<strong>the</strong><br />

probability. The latter probability can be obta<strong>in</strong>ed from our<br />

non-<strong>liquidation</strong><br />

<strong>liquidation</strong> process reported <strong>in</strong> Section 3. Let<br />

estimated<br />

( ∑ 6<br />

1 + = ˆγ 1j r i,t−j<br />

+ x ′ )<br />

it<br />

ˆβ 1 ˆα Φ<br />

j=1<br />

<strong>the</strong> estimated (conditional) probability that fund i does not liquidate<br />

denote<br />

period t, where Φ denotes <strong>the</strong> st<strong>and</strong>ard normal distribution function.<br />

<strong>in</strong><br />

Then <strong>the</strong> denom<strong>in</strong>ator of w 1,it<br />

∏t+s+1<br />

τ =t+1 ˆp iτ<br />

, (12)<br />

s = 4(quarters) <strong>in</strong> case of annual persistence. The unconditional<br />

where<br />

is equal to <strong>the</strong> ratio of funds that were not liquidated dur<strong>in</strong>g<br />

probability<br />

rank<strong>in</strong>g period <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> number of funds present at <strong>the</strong> beg<strong>in</strong>n<strong>in</strong>g of <strong>the</strong><br />

<strong>the</strong><br />

For <strong>the</strong> evaluation period, we compute average returns with<strong>in</strong> each<br />

period.<br />

aga<strong>in</strong> weighted by ŵ 1,it where <strong>the</strong> numerator now corresponds to <strong>the</strong><br />

decile,<br />

of survived funds <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> correspond<strong>in</strong>g decile.<br />

proportion<br />

we correct for <strong>self</strong>-<strong>selection</strong> <strong>bias</strong> by multiply<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> performance<br />

Next,<br />

with a second weight factor w 2,it . Thisfactoris<strong>the</strong>ratioof<strong>the</strong><br />

measure<br />

probability of non-<strong>self</strong>-<strong>selection</strong> (conditional upon not be<strong>in</strong>g liquidated),<br />

conditional<br />

<strong>and</strong> an unconditional non-<strong>self</strong>-<strong>selection</strong> probability (conditional<br />

not be<strong>in</strong>g liquidated). The conditional probability can be obta<strong>in</strong>ed<br />

upon<br />

<strong>the</strong> estimated <strong>self</strong>-<strong>selection</strong> process of Section 3. The unconditional<br />

from<br />

Verbeek (2001).<br />

ˆp it<br />

= ˆP {L it<br />

=1|r i,t−1,r i,t−2, ..., x it<br />

} =<br />

(11)<br />

<strong>in</strong>(9)isestimatedas<br />

18

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!