07.01.2015 Views

Fund liquidation, self-selection and look-ahead bias in the hedge ...

Fund liquidation, self-selection and look-ahead bias in the hedge ...

Fund liquidation, self-selection and look-ahead bias in the hedge ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

8: Persistence Estimates (Raw returns), alternative classification<br />

Table<br />

performance (raw returns)<br />

Average<br />

Four-Quarters<br />

(2) (3) (1) - (3)<br />

(1)<br />

non corrected corrected double corrected<br />

Decile<br />

1(losers) 0.1601 0.0922 0.0826 0.0775<br />

2 0.1658 0.1424 0.1370 0.0288<br />

3 0.1459 0.1235 0.1213 0.0246<br />

4 0.1451 0.1323 0.1321 0.0129<br />

5 0.1418 0.1372 0.1344 0.0074<br />

6 0.1342 0.1288 0.1290 0.0052<br />

7 0.1403 0.1340 0.1341 0.0090<br />

8 0.1565 0.1556 0.1581 −0.0016<br />

9 0.1900 0.1835 0.1806 0.0093<br />

quarter, funds are sorted <strong>in</strong>to ten rank portfolios based on <strong>the</strong>ir previous<br />

Each<br />

returns, respectively. Next, average returns over <strong>the</strong> next four quar-<br />

four-quarter<br />

are computed, for each decile. Us<strong>in</strong>g returns from 1994-2000, this produces a<br />

ters<br />

for each decile of 17 (overlapp<strong>in</strong>g) average four-quarter returns. The<br />

time-series<br />

<strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> table are <strong>the</strong> annualized time-series averages <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong>ir st<strong>and</strong>ard<br />

numbers<br />

<strong>in</strong> paren<strong>the</strong>ses. The st<strong>and</strong>ard errors are corrected for autocorrelation based<br />

errors<br />

<strong>the</strong> Newey-West approach. The corrected figures employ a weight<strong>in</strong>g procedure<br />

on<br />

to elim<strong>in</strong>ate <strong>liquidation</strong> <strong>bias</strong>, <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> double corrected employ a weight<strong>in</strong>g<br />

to elim<strong>in</strong>ate <strong>liquidation</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>self</strong>-<strong>selection</strong> <strong>bias</strong>. This table is based on<br />

procedure<br />

alternative classification of cases as "liquidated” or “<strong>self</strong>-selected” (see text).<br />

an<br />

(0.0911) (0.0960) (0.0957) (0.0210)<br />

(0.0600) (0.0542) (0.0528) (0.0142)<br />

(0.0455) (0.0408) (0.0400) (0.0134)<br />

(0.0387) (0.0365) (0.0350) (0.0081)<br />

(0.0252) (0.0242) (0.0270) (0.0054)<br />

(0.0318) (0.0369) (0.0361) (0.0089)<br />

(0.0381) (0.0396) (0.0400) (0.0095)<br />

(0.0325) (0.0337) (0.0339) (0.0087)<br />

(0.0468) (0.0479) (0.0471) (0.0097)<br />

10 (w<strong>in</strong>ners) 0.2029 0.1844 0.1824 0.0204<br />

(0.1016) (0.1006) (0.0995) (0.0131)<br />

w<strong>in</strong>ners - losers 0.0428 0.0922 0.0998 −0.0570<br />

(0.0693) (0.0728) (0.0720) (0.0188)<br />

26

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!