Fund liquidation, self-selection and look-ahead bias in the hedge ...
Fund liquidation, self-selection and look-ahead bias in the hedge ...
Fund liquidation, self-selection and look-ahead bias in the hedge ...
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
8: Persistence Estimates (Raw returns), alternative classification<br />
Table<br />
performance (raw returns)<br />
Average<br />
Four-Quarters<br />
(2) (3) (1) - (3)<br />
(1)<br />
non corrected corrected double corrected<br />
Decile<br />
1(losers) 0.1601 0.0922 0.0826 0.0775<br />
2 0.1658 0.1424 0.1370 0.0288<br />
3 0.1459 0.1235 0.1213 0.0246<br />
4 0.1451 0.1323 0.1321 0.0129<br />
5 0.1418 0.1372 0.1344 0.0074<br />
6 0.1342 0.1288 0.1290 0.0052<br />
7 0.1403 0.1340 0.1341 0.0090<br />
8 0.1565 0.1556 0.1581 −0.0016<br />
9 0.1900 0.1835 0.1806 0.0093<br />
quarter, funds are sorted <strong>in</strong>to ten rank portfolios based on <strong>the</strong>ir previous<br />
Each<br />
returns, respectively. Next, average returns over <strong>the</strong> next four quar-<br />
four-quarter<br />
are computed, for each decile. Us<strong>in</strong>g returns from 1994-2000, this produces a<br />
ters<br />
for each decile of 17 (overlapp<strong>in</strong>g) average four-quarter returns. The<br />
time-series<br />
<strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> table are <strong>the</strong> annualized time-series averages <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong>ir st<strong>and</strong>ard<br />
numbers<br />
<strong>in</strong> paren<strong>the</strong>ses. The st<strong>and</strong>ard errors are corrected for autocorrelation based<br />
errors<br />
<strong>the</strong> Newey-West approach. The corrected figures employ a weight<strong>in</strong>g procedure<br />
on<br />
to elim<strong>in</strong>ate <strong>liquidation</strong> <strong>bias</strong>, <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> double corrected employ a weight<strong>in</strong>g<br />
to elim<strong>in</strong>ate <strong>liquidation</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>self</strong>-<strong>selection</strong> <strong>bias</strong>. This table is based on<br />
procedure<br />
alternative classification of cases as "liquidated” or “<strong>self</strong>-selected” (see text).<br />
an<br />
(0.0911) (0.0960) (0.0957) (0.0210)<br />
(0.0600) (0.0542) (0.0528) (0.0142)<br />
(0.0455) (0.0408) (0.0400) (0.0134)<br />
(0.0387) (0.0365) (0.0350) (0.0081)<br />
(0.0252) (0.0242) (0.0270) (0.0054)<br />
(0.0318) (0.0369) (0.0361) (0.0089)<br />
(0.0381) (0.0396) (0.0400) (0.0095)<br />
(0.0325) (0.0337) (0.0339) (0.0087)<br />
(0.0468) (0.0479) (0.0471) (0.0097)<br />
10 (w<strong>in</strong>ners) 0.2029 0.1844 0.1824 0.0204<br />
(0.1016) (0.1006) (0.0995) (0.0131)<br />
w<strong>in</strong>ners - losers 0.0428 0.0922 0.0998 −0.0570<br />
(0.0693) (0.0728) (0.0720) (0.0188)<br />
26