08.01.2015 Views

2011 Year in Review and Key Trends for 2012

2011 Year in Review and Key Trends for 2012

2011 Year in Review and Key Trends for 2012

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>2011</strong> <strong>Year</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>Review</strong> <strong>and</strong><br />

<strong>Key</strong> <strong>Trends</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>2012</strong><br />

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY AND KEY TRENDS FOR <strong>2012</strong><br />

In this report, the Blakes Competition, Antitrust & Foreign<br />

Investment Group outl<strong>in</strong>es the key Canadian developments<br />

<strong>in</strong> the areas of competition <strong>and</strong> <strong>for</strong>eign <strong>in</strong>vestment law<br />

dur<strong>in</strong>g the year of <strong>2011</strong> <strong>and</strong> sets out the key trends to<br />

watch <strong>for</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>2012</strong>.<br />

• Mergers – This year, the Competition Bureau has taken<br />

an <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>gly active approach to its review of strategic<br />

mergers.<br />

o In addition to issu<strong>in</strong>g new merger en<strong>for</strong>cement<br />

guidel<strong>in</strong>es <strong>in</strong> October, Bureau staff sought<br />

an <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g level of documentary <strong>and</strong> data<br />

production as part of most merger reviews, both<br />

<strong>for</strong>mally through Canada’s new second request<br />

procedure <strong>and</strong> through <strong>in</strong><strong>for</strong>mal voluntary<br />

<strong>in</strong><strong>for</strong>mation requests.<br />

o This year witnessed the first two merger<br />

challenges s<strong>in</strong>ce 2005 by the Commissioner of<br />

Competition.<br />

o The Bureau <strong>in</strong>creased its focus on identify<strong>in</strong>g<br />

<strong>and</strong> review<strong>in</strong>g non-notifiable transactions.<br />

o In the context of merger plann<strong>in</strong>g <strong>and</strong> the<br />

negotiation of transaction agreements, this<br />

regulatory environment has <strong>in</strong>creased the use<br />

of covenants <strong>and</strong>, <strong>in</strong> some cases, reverse break<br />

fees, to allocate regulatory risk, <strong>and</strong> has placed<br />

heightened focus on issues such as gun-jump<strong>in</strong>g<br />

<strong>and</strong> <strong>in</strong>tegration plann<strong>in</strong>g protocols.<br />

• Cartels – The Commissioner has signalled a renewed<br />

focus by the Bureau on en<strong>for</strong>cement with respect to<br />

cartels. This has resulted <strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>creased en<strong>for</strong>cement<br />

activity with respect to domestic cartels <strong>and</strong> bid-rigg<strong>in</strong>g<br />

arrangements, an ef<strong>for</strong>t to resolve past cases, <strong>and</strong> a<br />

more circumspect approach to leniency applications.<br />

• S<strong>in</strong>gle-Firm Conduct – The Bureau has been active <strong>in</strong><br />

the areas of abuse of dom<strong>in</strong>ance, price ma<strong>in</strong>tenance<br />

<strong>and</strong> mislead<strong>in</strong>g advertis<strong>in</strong>g, hav<strong>in</strong>g commenced litigation<br />

<strong>and</strong>, <strong>in</strong> some cases, secured consent orders <strong>and</strong><br />

adm<strong>in</strong>istrative monetary penalties.<br />

• Class Actions – The British Columbia Court of Appeal<br />

found that there is no pass-on defence <strong>and</strong> that <strong>in</strong>direct<br />

purchasers do not have a claim <strong>for</strong> damages result<strong>in</strong>g<br />

from cartel conduct. More recently the Quebec Court of<br />

Appeal ruled that <strong>in</strong>direct purchaser claims are available<br />

<strong>in</strong> Quebec.<br />

• Foreign Investment – The application of the Investment<br />

Canada Act to acquisitions by non-Canadians cont<strong>in</strong>ues<br />

to be at the <strong>for</strong>efront of deal-mak<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>volv<strong>in</strong>g non-<br />

Canadian buyers <strong>in</strong> Canada.<br />

KEY TRENDS TO WATCH FOR IN <strong>2012</strong><br />

• New jurisprudence on mergers (e.g., the CCS/Complete<br />

merger, Air Canada/United Cont<strong>in</strong>ental jo<strong>in</strong>t venture),<br />

s<strong>in</strong>gle firm conduct (e.g., Visa/MasterCard case), <strong>and</strong><br />

cartels <strong>and</strong> bid-rigg<strong>in</strong>g.<br />

• Application <strong>and</strong> <strong>in</strong>terpretation of new merger guidel<strong>in</strong>es,<br />

as strategic mergers are likely to be the focus of<br />

en<strong>for</strong>cement <strong>in</strong> <strong>2012</strong>.<br />

• Clarity on class action certification jurisprudence, as the<br />

Supreme Court of Canada has granted leave to appeal <strong>in</strong><br />

two British Columbia Court of Appeal decisions <strong>in</strong>volv<strong>in</strong>g<br />

<strong>in</strong>direct purchaser claims.<br />

• Focus on the review of <strong>in</strong>creased <strong>for</strong>eign direct<br />

<strong>in</strong>vestment, <strong>in</strong> particular from SOEs, <strong>and</strong> the role of the<br />

M<strong>in</strong>ister of Industry under the Investment Canada Act.<br />

1

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!