Learning from Nine Examples of Peacebuilding Evaluation

More documents

Recommendations

Info

The study team conducted interviews to identify how artists conceptualize excellence in their work, facilitated discussions of performances through the prism of peacebuilding theory and practice, and gathered data about the effects of the activities on people involved in the performances, on those who witnessed the performances, and on the larger communities and societies. The study team then created and analyzed fourteen case studies that resulted in the identification of shared themes. The study revealed evidence that performances offer communities affected by conflict ways of understanding the complexity of the issues they face, for instance, by expressing the need for justice in its restorative as well as retributive aspects and by resisting abuse of power in ways that are creative rather than solely oppositional. The most effective cases combined artistic integrity and collaboration with cultural institutions committed to social change, which generally were able to reach broader audiences. Considerations on the Methodology Strengths • By taking a more open-ended research approach that allowed for patterns of meaning to emerge, the study originators were able to discover a range of cross-cutting themes and suggest a general theory of change that might be useful for those engaged in the intersection between peacebuilding and the arts. 38 Challenges and Pitfalls • Writing rigorous case studies that required artists to consider their work through the lens of conflict transformation and to look for evidence of outcomes proved to be a challenge for the performers who participated in this study. This may be the case for any evaluation participant who is not familiar with the required evaluation methodology or with the conceptual frameworks of the peacebuilding field. • Given the large pool of case studies, the research became expensive to complete and the volume of data challenging to analyze. Accordingly, the study team suggested commissioning additional researchers who would be paired with an individual artist. This may allow for the collection of more indepth information from the performers and a more rigorous critical review of the case studies.
Key Takeaways for the Organization and the Field • This study offers an approach to assess the contributions to peacebuilding of an entire field or subfield. Its originators assert that there is value in largescale research projects (in contrast to program-level evaluations), because such large-scale projects can generate understanding of the potential of a field as a whole and also generate frameworks that bring two fields into a mutually respectful relationship. The results of this study were released in a two-volume anthology, a documentary film, and a toolkit, which are currently being used in college and university classrooms and peacebuilding training programs for practitioners, educators, and policymakers in the arts and peacebuilding fields. For more information and to access materials on the project, visit www.actingtogether.org. 39
Page 1 and 2: “Proof of Concept”— Learning
Page 3 and 4: Friends of the Earth Middle East, O
Page 5 and 6: Table of Contents 6 Introduction 8
Page 7 and 8: Panelists and audience members at t
Page 9 and 10: There was interesting discussion, a
Page 11 and 12: • More than one presentation rais
Page 13 and 14: Evaluation Strategy At the start of
Page 15 and 16: Key Takeaways for the Organization
Page 17 and 18: contributed to the absence of viole
Page 19 and 20: gramming and to develop small, subt
Page 21 and 22: Case Study 3: Search for Common Gro
Page 25 and 26: Key findings of the case studies we
Page 27 and 28: Case Study 5: Friends of the Earth
Page 31 and 32: According to Mercy Corps, the use o
Page 33 and 34: • Clearly, funding is crucial. Th
Page 35 and 36: manage the process of contracts fro
Page 37: Case Study 8: Acting Together: Refl
Page 41 and 42: Evaluation Strategy Pact and Act! d
Page 43 and 44: The Evidence Summit - A Model for L
Page 45 and 46: afp-info@allianceforpeacebuilding.o
Page 47 and 48: Castro Loreta Executive Director Ce
Page 49 and 50: Ladnier Jason Deputy Director, Plan
Page 51 and 52: Stine Kelsi Program Officer Project
Page 53 and 54: • A description of what the organ
Page 55 and 56: 10:30 am - 12:30 pm *Evaluation Met
Page 57 and 58: 1:30 pm - 3:30 pm Moderator: »» M

Learning from Nine Examples of Peacebuilding Evaluation

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?