2002 Parumala Association â Facts - Malankara Syriac Voice

More documents

Recommendations

Info

2. Mathrubhumi - 23rd Jan 2002, Ktm edition.... Amicable solution seems impossible 3. Mathrubhumi - 29th Jan 2002, Ktm edition... HC rejects metran faction appeal to hand over manarkad church administration to court nominee. 4. Mangalam - 4th feb 2002, Ktm edition..... Some IOC hurches may not participate 5. Manorama - 18th feb 2002, Ktm edition.... Manarkad church sends vakeel notice against selection of representatives without the consent of the parish 6. Mathrubhumi - 21st feb 2002, Ktm edition.... SOC to file complaints against election malpractices. 7. Mathrubhumi - 3rd march 2002, Ktm edition...Metran faction manipulating election process 8. Mathrubhumi - 4th march 2002...A manipuated voters list is published for the association election 9. Mathrubhumi - 7th March 2002...A forged voters list is published for Angamaly and thrissur dioceses 10. Mathrubhumi - 8th march 2002.... Two voters list for most churches in Kandanad diocese. 11. Manorama - 12th march 2002... Mor Athanasios os chengannur accepts that in churches having disputes two voters list have been permitted. 12. Mathrubhumi - 12th march 2002.. Manipulations in the voters list of Kochi diocese also 13. Mathrubhumi - 15th march 2002 ... Last minute efforts for peace failed 14. Mathrubhumi - 18th march 2002.... Arthat church files petition in supreme court against their factions decision 15. Mathrubhumi - 18th march 2002.... Govt must act impartially 16. The Hindu .....18th march 2002..... Govt urged to hold referendum 17. Mathrubhumi - 13th march 2002.... An analysis of the crisis in the malankara church
18. Mangalam - 22nd march 2202..... 'Kananaya Association' questions the inclusion of two members in the Managing committee of Methran Kakshi 19. Mathrubhumi - 6th april 02 ..... Split in the malankara church complete. The concluding arguments of the Methran Kakshis is that, the right thing to do would have been to attend the association meeting and then if there were complaints to approach the court of law. Such a practical and innocent suggestion. The Methran Kakshis forget that we have come a long way since 1958. They cannot cheat us always. If we had attended the association meeting it would have been suicidal to us. All the Methran Kakshi claims which have been accepted by the Supreme Court are based on our acceptance of them in 1958. They regularly take pleasure in ridiculing us asking ‘what is the point in opposing now when we had accepted Catholicate, 1934 constituion etc.,. in 1958’. Compare that situation again with 2002. The electoral process was being pursued with a single point agenda of somehow electing Mathews II as the Malankara Methran. When this was the case and if we had become a part of the meeting the decisions of the said meeting would have been legally binding on us. Later, when there would have been a conflict the the Methran Kakshis, they would surely say... ' parumala meeting il vayum pothi irunnavanokke ippol vaalu pokkunnu'. This has happened in 1970's. Of course we could have questioned it in the court but to what effect This present court cases started in 1975 and what have we achieved after 35 years We did the right thing by boycotting the elections. There was no choice left to us.
Page 1 and 2: 2002 Parumala Association - Facts T
Page 3 and 4: epresentatives were to be decided w
Page 5 and 6: 6. It was not made clear who would
Page 7: Means, one single church could send

2002 Parumala Association â Facts - Malankara Syriac Voice

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?

2002 Parumala Association â Facts - Malankara Syriac Voice