10.01.2015 Views

US EAST COAST 2012 - HFMWeek

US EAST COAST 2012 - HFMWeek

US EAST COAST 2012 - HFMWeek

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>US</strong> <strong>EAST</strong> <strong>COAST</strong> <strong>2012</strong><br />

THE REAL RISK OF<br />

FAKING IT<br />

DID THE IND<strong>US</strong>TRY LEARN FROM THE 2008 CRISIS ARE RISKS BEING PROPERLY MONITORED OR ARE WE DESTINED TO HEAD INTO<br />

THE SAME STORM AGAIN DAMIAN HANDZY, OF INVESTOR ANALYTICS, TALKS TO HFMWEEK ABOUT THE REAL COSTS OF NOT<br />

ANTICIPATING AND MANAGING RISK<br />

Damian Handzy,<br />

CEO, co-founded Investor<br />

Analytics in 1999 to provide<br />

risk management services<br />

to the alternatives industry.<br />

He was named chairman<br />

and CEO in 2006 and has<br />

grown Investor Analytics into<br />

one of the global leaders<br />

in risk analysis and risk<br />

management solutions.<br />

18 HFMWEEK.COM<br />

Damian Handzy, the CEO of Investor Analytics,<br />

observed in a recent white paper<br />

that the financial crisis served to remind<br />

us that a free market provides the means<br />

to win and to lose – but he added that not<br />

all financial managers followed the major<br />

markets into free fall in the aftermath of 2008. The managers<br />

who successfully navigated the crisis, said Handzy,<br />

understood and acted on the three tenets of risk management:<br />

(1) all risk models have built-in assumptions that<br />

are not applicable in every circumstance; (2) correctly<br />

analysing the data takes real expertise; and (3) model<br />

limitations can only be ignored at great peril. <strong>HFMWeek</strong><br />

spoke to Handzy recently to get his views on the current<br />

state of risk management – have managers reset their approach<br />

to risk management or is there still over-dependence<br />

on models as a substitute<br />

<strong>HFMWeek</strong> (HFM): Given the number of financial<br />

events that have happened, even since 2008, do you<br />

think managers learned some real risk management<br />

lessons<br />

Damian Handzy (DH): The real question is, did we learn<br />

any lasting lessons I hope we did, but as a student of human<br />

behaviour, I know that we all have selective memories,<br />

which is why we often have to repeat our mistakes to<br />

learn from them. When times are good, it’s our nature to<br />

want to believe that what goes up will keep going up even<br />

though we have a mountain of evidence to contradict<br />

that notion. In 2008, we were reminded once again of<br />

the very high cost of ignoring history, a mistake that still<br />

haunts the industry. However, the<br />

events did open up a healthy and, I<br />

believe, lasting dialogue about the<br />

importance of real risk analytics<br />

and management versus just having<br />

models that measure various<br />

statistical outputs.<br />

IN 2008, WE WERE<br />

REMINDED ONCE AGAIN<br />

OF THE VERY HIGH COST<br />

OF IGNORING HISTORY,<br />

A MISTAKE THAT STILL<br />

HAUNTS THE IND<strong>US</strong>TRY<br />

”<br />

HFM: Was ‘don’t put all your<br />

eggs in one basket’ better risk<br />

management<br />

DH: The multiple basket approach<br />

only works to a degree.<br />

The idea behind it is, of course,<br />

diversification, which requires uncorrelated<br />

investments. But during<br />

a market event like 2008, almost every investment<br />

became very highly correlated with everything else. As<br />

a lot of assets become contaminated, the opportunity to<br />

diversify was reduced.<br />

That’s where hedging strategies and stress testing<br />

come into play. In this case, what you’re stressing is<br />

model assumptions – like correlations – to measure the<br />

portfolio’s risks in highly correlated markets. Stressing<br />

correlations is key to understanding how well diversified<br />

the portfolio really is. At Investor Analytics, we’ve been<br />

providing stress testing as part of our system for years.<br />

The ‘correlation goes to one’ stress is simple to understand<br />

and provides a lot of useful information.<br />

HFM: What is the highest barrier to companies adopting<br />

a risk management culture<br />

DH: There are both cost and human factors at play in<br />

the decision to integrate more robust risk controls. First,<br />

we are in a challenging economy where everyone is being<br />

asked to contribute more with less and where resources<br />

are scarce. An existing risk system, whether built inhouse<br />

or purchased in the past, may seem like a low-cost<br />

approach if the direct expenditure is low. But that lowcost<br />

system is probably not scalable or capable of handling<br />

today’s portfolios or markets.<br />

Possibly even more important is the human factor –<br />

who is going to control the risks taken by the portfolio<br />

managers Who is going to have the authority to tell a<br />

portfolio manager to de-lever or reduce risk if they are<br />

exceeding thresholds A risk management culture starts<br />

with – or dies from – the top. If the head trader or CEO<br />

doesn’t buy into a risk management<br />

culture, it’s difficult to implement<br />

such a system effectively.<br />

HFM: What are the biggest challenges<br />

facing your clients<br />

DH: Certainly there has been a<br />

significant change in the number<br />

of stress tests being conducted<br />

and the depth of detail that investors<br />

and regulators alike are now<br />

demanding. For example, the<br />

SEC-mandated Form PF now requires<br />

certain hedge funds to submit<br />

on a regular basis analytics for<br />

a variety of stress tests in addition

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!