10.01.2015 Views

Analysis of Genes for Stigma Coloration in Rice - IRRI books

Analysis of Genes for Stigma Coloration in Rice - IRRI books

Analysis of Genes for Stigma Coloration in Rice - IRRI books

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Effects <strong>of</strong> genotype x<br />

environment <strong>in</strong>teraction on<br />

late-head<strong>in</strong>g Japanese rice<br />

T. Sato<br />

Japanese rice (Oryza sativa L.) genotypes EG1, EG2, EG3, EG4, EG5, EG6, and EG7<br />

have the genetic constitution E 1 E 1 e 2 e 2 e 3 e 3<br />

, e 1 e 1 E 2 E 2 e 3 e 3<br />

, e 1 e 1 e 2 e 2 E 3 E 3<br />

, E 1 E 1 E 2 E 2 e 3 e 3<br />

,<br />

e 1 e 1 E 2 E 2 E 3 E 3 , E 1 E 1 e 2 e 2 E 3 E 3<br />

, and E 1 E 1 E 2 E 2 E 3 E 3 , respectively. The flower<strong>in</strong>g responses<br />

<strong>of</strong> the seven genotypes were analyzed under four conditions:<br />

• short daylength (10-h photoperiod) (SD) and high temperature (28 °C) (HT)<br />

• long daylength (14 h) (LD) and HT<br />

• SD and low temperature (18 °C) (LT)<br />

• LD and LT<br />

The time to panicle <strong>in</strong>itiation (PI) <strong>of</strong> these genotypes varied from 42 to 116 d under<br />

LD, HT. Under SD, HT, however, PI occurred <strong>in</strong> 35-38 d. Furthermore, the total number<br />

<strong>of</strong> leaves on the ma<strong>in</strong> culm under LD, HT appreciably differed among EG l<strong>in</strong>es. Under<br />

SD, HT, the differences were fewer (Table 1). There<strong>for</strong>e, there were significant<br />

differences among the seven genotypes <strong>in</strong> the photoperiod-sensitive phase, and not<br />

<strong>in</strong> the basic vegetative phase. Low temperature <strong>in</strong>creased the difference <strong>in</strong> leaf<br />

number <strong>in</strong> EGI and EG4, which have gene E 1 , by 2.5 and 1.5, respectively, while the<br />

difference <strong>in</strong> EG3 and EG5, which have gene E 3 , was 0.5 and 0.6, respectively. These<br />

results <strong>in</strong>dicate that genotypes hav<strong>in</strong>g E 1 are more photoperiod sensitive under LT than<br />

ones hav<strong>in</strong>g E 3 .<br />

Genotypes EG1, EG2, and EG4 (without the E 3 gene) had a critical photoperiod<br />

between 13 and 14 h under 23 °C; the other genotypes, between 12-13 h (Fig. 1).<br />

However, under excessive photoperiod (14 h), the panicles <strong>of</strong> EGI and EG4 developed<br />

more than those <strong>of</strong> EG3 and EG5.<br />

Thus, late-head<strong>in</strong>g genes E 1 , E 2 , and E 3 ,control, not the basic vegetative phase but<br />

the photoperiod-sensitive phase. Furthermore, the difference <strong>in</strong> flower<strong>in</strong>g behavior <strong>of</strong><br />

E 1 , E 2 , and E 3 genes under optimal, critical, and excessive photoperiod may partly<br />

expla<strong>in</strong> the complex pattern <strong>of</strong> head<strong>in</strong>g behavior when the seven genotypes are grown<br />

at different latitudes <strong>in</strong> Japan.<br />

Posters 773

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!