Landscape Capacity Study for Wind Farm ... - North Ayrshire Council
Landscape Capacity Study for Wind Farm ... - North Ayrshire Council
Landscape Capacity Study for Wind Farm ... - North Ayrshire Council
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
and would appear to diminish the perceived vertical scale of the steep scarp above<br />
the settled coastal edge.<br />
Impacts on visual amenity<br />
Kaim Hill is well-used by walkers and mountain bikers. It <strong>for</strong>ms a key vantage point<br />
<strong>for</strong> spectacular views over the Firth of Clyde and the islands to the west. The LVIA, in<br />
asserting that turbines would be ‘visually permeable’, ignores the visual distraction of<br />
moving blades and intrusion of access tracks and turbines in the <strong>for</strong>eground of what<br />
are currently open views from the hill. Impacts on people accessing the hill would be<br />
adverse and significant.<br />
While the proposal would be visible from the settled lowlands to the east and south, it<br />
would be seen in the context of existing and consented wind farm development which<br />
would reduce its impact. The development however is sited on the western periphery<br />
of the upland area and as such it would be visually prominent, significantly impacting<br />
on views from settlements, roads and coastal areas in the adjacent ‘Raised Beach<br />
Coast’ character area to the west. There would be adverse and significant impacts on<br />
views from the settlements of Largs and Fairlie where turbines would be prominent<br />
features seen in views from popular coastal esplanades and beaches. Existing wind<br />
farm development is not visible from these settlements or the coastal fringe and<br />
lower hill slopes between them at present.<br />
The visualisations <strong>for</strong> viewpoints 5, 7 and 8 in the ES illustrate the likely visual<br />
dominance of the Kaim Hill proposal seen from the settled coastal fringe. I consider<br />
that the magnitude of change is under-estimated in the assessment from viewpoints<br />
5 (Largs) and 7 (Kelburn Country Park) and that impacts on high sensitivity receptors<br />
would be major not the moderate/major concluded in the ES. Whilst accepting that<br />
views from these locations will tend to focus on the Firth of Clyde, the proximity of the<br />
wind farm, its location on the skyline of hills which <strong>for</strong>m the backdrop to the view and<br />
overlapping of turbines would increase the magnitude of change.<br />
Further to the west, there would be significant adverse impacts on views from the<br />
Firth of Clyde, from Great Cumbrae and from the east coast of Bute. Although this<br />
proposal only comprises 5 turbines, and there<strong>for</strong>e the extent of development visible<br />
on the skyline would be limited, the turbines would be noticeably larger and more<br />
visually prominent than other existing and consented wind farm developments visible<br />
on the skyline of the <strong>North</strong> <strong>Ayrshire</strong> uplands from these areas.<br />
The visualisations from viewpoints 2 and 4 illustrate the prominence of the proposal<br />
further west from the islands of Great Cumbrae and Bute (Kilchattan). They are also<br />
representative of views from the Firth of Clyde when sailing in the area. I consider<br />
that there would be significant and adverse impacts on visual amenity from these<br />
areas.<br />
49