11.11.2012 Views

Landscape Capacity Study for Wind Farm ... - North Ayrshire Council

Landscape Capacity Study for Wind Farm ... - North Ayrshire Council

Landscape Capacity Study for Wind Farm ... - North Ayrshire Council

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

and would appear to diminish the perceived vertical scale of the steep scarp above<br />

the settled coastal edge.<br />

Impacts on visual amenity<br />

Kaim Hill is well-used by walkers and mountain bikers. It <strong>for</strong>ms a key vantage point<br />

<strong>for</strong> spectacular views over the Firth of Clyde and the islands to the west. The LVIA, in<br />

asserting that turbines would be ‘visually permeable’, ignores the visual distraction of<br />

moving blades and intrusion of access tracks and turbines in the <strong>for</strong>eground of what<br />

are currently open views from the hill. Impacts on people accessing the hill would be<br />

adverse and significant.<br />

While the proposal would be visible from the settled lowlands to the east and south, it<br />

would be seen in the context of existing and consented wind farm development which<br />

would reduce its impact. The development however is sited on the western periphery<br />

of the upland area and as such it would be visually prominent, significantly impacting<br />

on views from settlements, roads and coastal areas in the adjacent ‘Raised Beach<br />

Coast’ character area to the west. There would be adverse and significant impacts on<br />

views from the settlements of Largs and Fairlie where turbines would be prominent<br />

features seen in views from popular coastal esplanades and beaches. Existing wind<br />

farm development is not visible from these settlements or the coastal fringe and<br />

lower hill slopes between them at present.<br />

The visualisations <strong>for</strong> viewpoints 5, 7 and 8 in the ES illustrate the likely visual<br />

dominance of the Kaim Hill proposal seen from the settled coastal fringe. I consider<br />

that the magnitude of change is under-estimated in the assessment from viewpoints<br />

5 (Largs) and 7 (Kelburn Country Park) and that impacts on high sensitivity receptors<br />

would be major not the moderate/major concluded in the ES. Whilst accepting that<br />

views from these locations will tend to focus on the Firth of Clyde, the proximity of the<br />

wind farm, its location on the skyline of hills which <strong>for</strong>m the backdrop to the view and<br />

overlapping of turbines would increase the magnitude of change.<br />

Further to the west, there would be significant adverse impacts on views from the<br />

Firth of Clyde, from Great Cumbrae and from the east coast of Bute. Although this<br />

proposal only comprises 5 turbines, and there<strong>for</strong>e the extent of development visible<br />

on the skyline would be limited, the turbines would be noticeably larger and more<br />

visually prominent than other existing and consented wind farm developments visible<br />

on the skyline of the <strong>North</strong> <strong>Ayrshire</strong> uplands from these areas.<br />

The visualisations from viewpoints 2 and 4 illustrate the prominence of the proposal<br />

further west from the islands of Great Cumbrae and Bute (Kilchattan). They are also<br />

representative of views from the Firth of Clyde when sailing in the area. I consider<br />

that there would be significant and adverse impacts on visual amenity from these<br />

areas.<br />

49

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!