Neurotic disorders

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Personality disorder .......................................................................................................................................... Paranoid personality disorder was the second most survey demonstrated that for male young offenders prevalent type of personality disorder, being found anti-social personality traits were highly prevalent. in 26% of male remand young offenders and 22% Over three quarters of the men aged 16 to 20 in the of male sentenced young offenders. Borderline sample, both sentenced and remand, showed personality disorder was the next most common evidence of anti-social personality disorder in the personality disorder. Previous research has clinical interviews, either alone or in combination suggested that both paranoid and borderline with other types of personality disorder. personality <strong>disorders</strong> are highly comorbid with anti-social personality disorder in criminal samples The lay interview data showed similar proportions (Coid, 1996). (Table 3.1) with probable anti-social personality disorder but a higher proportion of respondents were Respondents could be assessed as showing evidence identified as likdy to have types of personality of more than one type of personality disorder and disorder other than anti-social. Among the men, respondents were grouped into four categories, both remand and sentenced, a smaller proportion These were: 'anti-social only', which indudes those of respondents were placed in the 'anti-social subjects who had anti-social personality disorder only' group and a higher proportion in the 'antiwithout any additional personality disorder social and other' group on the basis of the lay category; 'anti-socialand other', which interview data than was the case with the clinical encompasses those who had anti-social personality interview results. disorder in combination with at least one other type of personality disorder; 'other only', which Using the lay interview data, the proportion of contains respondents with one or more types of women young offenders who were classified' as personality disorder other than anti-s0cial; and likely to have anti-social personality disorder only lastly those with no personality disorder. The was smaller than for the men in the sample. Only proportion of the respondents from each sample 12% of sentenced women were placed in the antigroup which were placed in each of these categories social only group compared with 23% of male on the basis of the information obtained from the remand and 28% of male sentenced young clinical interviews is shown in Figure 3.1 and Table offenders. In contrast, 35% of female sentenced 3.1. These same categories were also used to group young offenders were included in the 'other only' people using the data from the SCID-II screening group compared with only 17% of male remand questionnaire included in the lay interviews and and 8% of male sentenced young offenders. the distribution of the groups of personality disorder obtained in this way by prisoner type and Female young offenders were also more likely than sex is shown in Table 3.2. women prisoners as a whole to show evidence of probable personality disorder - 84% of female Although the DSM-IV recommends that an sentenced young offenders did so compared with assessment of anti-social personality disorder should 73% of all sentenced women prisoners (Singleton only be made in individuals aged 18 or above, this et al, 1998). (Tables 3. I and 3.2) 22 Psychiatric Morbidity arnongYoung Offenders in England and Wales -7716-
Personality disorder 3 Table 3,1 Prevalence of personality disorder (from clinical interview " by--prisoner typeandseX,=r maleyoungoffendersC;mpared_ithallmale _soners Typeofpersonality disorder Maleremand Malesentenced Allmaleremand Allmalesentenced youngoffenders youngoffenders prisoners * prisoners * Percentage ofthepopulationwitheachtypeofdisorder Avoidant 12 6 14 7 Dependent 4 6 4 1 Obsessive-Compulsive 4 12 7 10 Paranoid 26 22 29 20 Schizotypal 2 2 2 Schizoid 10 8 8 6 Histrionic 1 2 Narcissistic 6 6 8 7 Borderline 24 17 23 14 Antisocial 76 81 63 49 Antisocial only 37 50 Antisocial andother 3 84 31 88 35 78 20 64 Otherordy 6 15 15 Nopersonality disorder 16 12 22 36 Base 49 44 181 210 • SourceTable5.i Singletonet al(1998). Table 3.2 Prevalence of probable personality disorder (from lay interview byPdsonertypeandsex , :_ _ i"i _,_I_ '.,: :!i: ._I!__II! :ii Maleremand Malesentenced Femaleremand Femalesentenced youngoffenders youngoffenders youngoffenders youngoffenders Typeofpersonalitydisorder % % % % Anlisocial only 23 28 [2] 12 Antisocial andother 46 43 [13] 37 Otheronly 17 8 [9] 35 Nopersonality disorder 14 20 [2] 16 Base 314 169 26 81 PsychiatricMorbidityamongYoungOffendersinEnglandandWales 23 -7717-
Page 2 and 3: :iilJ!i _ national d:%=STaTiSTiCS o
Page 4 and 5: Navigatethroughthis documentby usin
Page 6 and 7: Listoftables Page Page Chapter 1 Ch
Page 8 and 9: Listoffigures Page Page Chapter 2 C
Page 10 and 11: -7694-
Page 12 and 13: Summary ...........................
Page 14 and 15: Summary Summary- continued • Hero
Page 16 and 17: Summary Summary- continued Daily li
Page 18 and 19: 2 ! ! Introduction __ dependence an
Page 20 and 21: Characteristics of the sampled youn
Page 28 and 29: ,_ Characteristics Of the sampled y
Page 30 and 31: Personality disorder 3.1 Assessment
Page 34 and 35: Psychotic and severe affective diso
Page 36 and 37: Neurotic disorders 5.1 Assessment
Page 38 and 39: _-- _,_ Neurotic disorders ........
Page 40 and 41: -" ,3 Neurotic disorders ..........
Page 42 and 43: - Neurotic disorders Table 5.3 Prev
Page 44 and 45: Self-harm (suicidal ideation, suici
Page 46 and 47: Serf-harm (suicidal ideation, suici
Page 48 and 49: Alcohol misuse and drug dependence
Page 50 and 51: ./ Alcohol misuse and drug dependen
Page 52 and 53: Alcohol misuse and drug dependence
Page 54 and 55: Intellectual functioning 8.1 Assess
Page 56 and 57: intellectual functioning Table 8.1
Page 58 and 59: Characteristics of young offenders
Page 60 and 61: c_ Characteristics of young offende
Page 64 and 65: _'_ Characteristics of young offend
Page 70 and 71: t_ / Characteristics of young offen
Page 72 and 73: | 0 Co-occurrence of mental and phy
Page 74 and 75: '0 Co-occurrence of mental and phys
Page 76 and 77: I 0 Co-occurrence of mental and phy
Page 78 and 79: Use of medication and services 11.1
Page 80 and 81: I I Use of medication and services
Page 82 and 83:
I I Use of medication and services
Page 84 and 85:
! I Use of medication and services
Page 86 and 87:
! I Use of medication and services
Page 88 and 89:
.! 2 Daily living and social functi
Page 90 and 91:
,_ 2_ Daily living and social funct
Page 92 and 93:
Risk factors for mental disorder 13
Page 94 and 95:
',3 Risk factors for mental disorde
Page 96 and 97:
_ | ..2 Risk factors for mental dis
Page 98 and 99:
3 Risk factors for mental disorder
Page 100 and 101:
Page 102 and 103:
Page 104:
References Ramsay M and Partridge (
show all

Neurotic disorders

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?