11.01.2015 Views

Neurotic disorders

Neurotic disorders

Neurotic disorders

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

.! 2 Daily living and social functioning<br />

12.3 Evidenceof disciplinaryor other peoplewith mentaldisorder(Mehzer et al, 1995c,<br />

management problems<br />

Meltzer et ai, 1996c). For the prison survey, the only<br />

modification made was to broaden the frame of<br />

All respondents were asked two questions to reveal reference from family and friends to "everyone you<br />

evidence of disciplinary problems. Firstly, they were know (indudingthose here at the prison as well as<br />

asked if they had had any spells in cellular<br />

those elsewhere)". This was to reflect the fact that,<br />

confinement ('down the block') since coming to for some young offenders, the most important<br />

prison for the current offence. If they had, they sources of support might be people within the<br />

were also asked how many spells. Secondly, they prison system who might not have been regarded<br />

were asked if they had been given'added days', i.e. as family or friends. Another group of questions<br />

days had been added on to the minimum time they assessed the extent of respondents' social networks.<br />

would be required to serve before being considered More information about the questions themselves<br />

for parole. Strictly speaking, remand prisoners can be found in Chapter 15 of the main report<br />

cannot be given 'added days' although they may be (Singleton et al, 1998).<br />

given prospective added days. Therefore added days<br />

are less frequently used as a punishment for<br />

prisoners on remand; awards such as fines, and loss 12.4.2 Perceivedsocialsupport<br />

of privileges or ceUular confmement are used<br />

instead. In addition, respondents were asked if they The level of perceived social support was low in all<br />

had been held in 'slxipped' conditions, in which all sample groups compared with that found in the<br />

items which could possibly be used for self-harm surveyor psychiatric morbidity among adults in<br />

are removed from the prisoner for their own private households (Meltzer et al, 1995c). Over a<br />

protection, during their current prison term. This quarter of respondents in all groups reported a<br />

is done when prisoners are a danger to themselves, severe lack of social support compared with a little<br />

others or property and is not a punishment, over a tenth of those aged 16-24 in the private<br />

household survey. A further third reported a<br />

Given that sentenced young offenders had spent moderate lack of social support. There was no<br />

longer on average in prison than remand young significant differences between remand or<br />

offenders, it is not surprising that they were more sentenced young offenders or between men and<br />

likely to report having been held in cellular women in the proportions reporting a lack of social<br />

confinement or to have been given added days. For support. (Table 12.3)<br />

example, 38% of male sentenced young offenders<br />

had been held in solitary and 37% had been given<br />

added days, compared with 20% and 17% of male 12.4.3 Extentof socialnetworks<br />

remand young offenders who had been in cellular<br />

confinement or been given added days, respectively. Having a small primary support group of three<br />

There was no difference between the remand and dose friends or relatives or fewer has been shown<br />

sentenced male young offenders in the proportion to be associated with a greater risk of psychiatric<br />

who reported being held in'stripped' conditions, morbidity (Brugha et al, 1993). In the survey of<br />

(Table 12.2) psychiatric morbidity of adults living in private<br />

households six per cent of women and seven per<br />

cent of men said they had a primary support group<br />

12.4 Socialsupport of three or less (Meltzer et al, 1995c). However, the<br />

proportion of young offenders included in this<br />

12.4.1 Assessment of social support survey who had a small primary support group was<br />

'<br />

about twice this: 13% of male remand and 11% of<br />

Perceived social support was assessed from male sentenced young offenders, and 19% of the<br />

respondents' answers to seven questions which female sample. These proportions are closer to the<br />

were originally used in the 1987 Health and figures obtained in the survey of residents of<br />

Lifestyle survey (Health Promotion Research Trust, institutions catering for people with mental<br />

1987) and were also included in the ONS (OPCS) disorder. In that survey the proportion of<br />

surveys of psychiatric morbidity among adults in respondents with a small primary support group<br />

private households and in institutions catering for ranged from 18% of those with affective psychoses<br />

78 PsychiatricMorbidity amongYoungOffenders in EnglandandWales<br />

-7772-

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!