11.01.2015 Views

Volume 2-05, Chapter 3 - City of Wichita

Volume 2-05, Chapter 3 - City of Wichita

Volume 2-05, Chapter 3 - City of Wichita

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Section 3.1 - Stormwater Management Controls Overview<br />

Structural<br />

Control<br />

Alternative<br />

TSS<br />

Removal<br />

Suitability<br />

Site<br />

Applicability<br />

Implementation<br />

Considerations<br />

Physiographic<br />

Factors/Soils<br />

Special<br />

Considerations<br />

Other<br />

Issues OK<br />

Bioretention<br />

Area<br />

Stormwater<br />

Wetland<br />

Proprietary<br />

Treatment<br />

Gravity<br />

Separator<br />

Alum<br />

Treatment<br />

<br />

<br />

Green Ro<strong>of</strong> X<br />

Modular<br />

Porous Paver<br />

System<br />

Porous<br />

Pavement<br />

X<br />

High Cost<br />

High Cost<br />

High Cost<br />

<br />

X<br />

To provide additional pollutant removal capabilities in an attempt to better meet the target<br />

removal, bioretention could be used to treat the parking lot and driveway run<strong>of</strong>f. The<br />

bioretention will provide some TSS removal while improving the aesthetics <strong>of</strong> the site.<br />

The site drainage system could be designed so the bioretention drains to the extended<br />

detention micropool pond for additional treatment. If milder sloped turf areas are provided,<br />

such as along the sides <strong>of</strong> the parking lots, vegetated swales and filters could be added to the<br />

list <strong>of</strong> acceptable controls for additional treatment if not restricted by soil permeability.<br />

Finally, modular porous pavers would be a good choice for the occasional overflow parking<br />

that a church typically receives during weekly services. The low infiltration rate <strong>of</strong> site soils<br />

could be overcome by adding an underdrain to the pavers.<br />

3.1.4 On-Line Versus Off-Line Structural Controls<br />

3.1.4.1 Introduction<br />

Structural stormwater controls are designed to be either “on-line” or “<strong>of</strong>f-line.” Figure 3-1<br />

shows an example <strong>of</strong> an <strong>of</strong>f-line sand filter and an on-line enhanced swale.<br />

On-line facilities may provide treatment <strong>of</strong> all or part <strong>of</strong> the WQ v and may provide control <strong>of</strong> all<br />

or part <strong>of</strong> the CP v . They may be designed to control flood flows; if not, they are designed to<br />

receive and safely pass the entire range <strong>of</strong> storm flows up to the 100-year discharge.<br />

Off-line facilities are designed to receive only a specified flow rate or volume through the use<br />

<strong>of</strong> a flow regulator (i.e. diversion structure, flow splitter, etc). Flow regulators are typically<br />

Page 3 - 14<br />

<strong>Volume</strong> 2, Technical Guidance

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!