MOVIETONE NEW8 . - Parallax View Annex

More documents

Recommendations

Info

. I I But if Detour can reward the receptive filmgoer, it does, by its very nature, demand a little more than the ordinary film. After all, there is no denying that a film shot in a very short time (rumored to have been four days, more likely five or six), on a budget of-it almost seems-something in the neighborhood of 45 cents, may lack some of the slickness and polish we ordinarily expect. But if we focus on what the film offers rather than what it lacks, we can begin to appreciate what is, on reflection, an extraordinary piece of filmmaking . . To understand Detour's wry perversity ,it may be necessary to know something of the man who made it, Edgar G. Ulmer: an extraordinarily gifted German who began his career working with people like Lang and Murnau, and himself made films in Hollywood for over 30 years. Yet the biggest "star" he ever directed was Zachary Scott and his longest shooting schedule was 12 days, with most of his films made even more quickly. He deliberately refused to work for any major studio, preferring the complete creative freedom and low budgets of Poverty Row. The "freedom" he found there enabled him to direct Yiddish-language pictures, a Ukrainian musical, a Harlem movie, and a prison film called Women in Chains. Ulmer may have been able to make such films exactly as he wanted, but with such dubious projects, with budgets so small many scenes were done in one take, his freedom often must have seemed as illusory as that of Detour's hitchhiker. On the surface, the film is fairly simple: a man hitchhiking across the country, inadvertently involved in an accidental death, becomes involved also in a murder. Initially, his traveling suggests the exercise of free will, but as the road begins to seem endless this freedom is revealed as complete entrapment. The reversal extends even to the ways we perceive the visual imagery. As he sets out, full of faith and optimism, riding down the highway in an open convertible seems like an expansive, liberating experience. But when later he, as driver of the car, picks up a hitchhiker himself, all the space "out there" beyond the car ceases to matter as his circumstances constrict his existence to the narrow dimensions of the car's interior. The sequence in question has a heightened effect precisely because that expansive, open world is so prominent visually, its physical proximity so evident yet so increasingly irrelevant to his existence as the alternatives it offers are increasingly closed to him. • This notion of contrast, often extended beyond all rationality, is central to Ulmer's method. Grim, sordid, bizarre events take place in the most banal surroundings, and, because of those events, the 18 meaning of the surroundings themselves is somehow altered, our responses to them changed. The first death in the film is an accident so farfetched it seems surreal, but the second death-a grisly murder by longdistance telephone-seems to exist beyond all laws of plausibility. But it is the very implausibility of the action, juxtaposed with the ordinariness of the milieu-a nightclub, an apartment, a used car lot, and, of course,. the road-that gives the film much of its force. Ulmer is actually taking several American fantasies ("going west", looking to Hollywood for success and happiness, finding freedom and happiness on the open road-cf. Capra's It Happened One Night) and performing unnatural acts on them, with devastating effects. If, for example, we think of the hitchhiker in terms of an Horatio Alger character, we see that he meets with just the opposite of an unbroken string of good luck and success; each ridiculous plot twist narrows his alternatives, increases his victimization, further emphasizes his lack of free will. In fact, the closest thing to a moment of freedom in the movie (though the character doesn't perceive it as such) comes in the extraordinary' sequence in which, working in the nightclub he professes to despise, he plays a brilliant, disjointed piano improvisation, shown largely through closeups of his crazily moving fingers. At the heart of the film, then, is its belief in the existence of fate: irrational, relentless, malevolent. Fate seems almost a palpable thing, shaping the action with a malicious perversity beyond reason, beyond resistance. But Detour is so perverse it upsets even our sense of inevitability. From the introduction we know that the film's flashbacks will gradually reveal the chain of circumstances that have brought the character to his present state of desperation. But we are not really prepared for anything more, for a final injustice presented in a casual longshot so indifferent it's practically a throwaway. In retrospect, this shot perfectly extends the. logic of the main body of the film by denying that final myth of mobility and freedom, of the doomed outcast bound to wander forever. When we discuss the conditions of Ulmer's career, the necessity for choosing between "selling out" to a major studio or working on Poverty Row, we can easily see how he might have felt a personal affinity for a project like Detour. It is no accident that the hitchhiker's intended destination should be Hollywood where he will find success and happiness. (There is even one shot in which two characters are framed in a window that looks for all the world exactly like a movie screen.) After a decade of Jive Junctions and Women in Chains, of limited options
and illusory freedom, of entrapment within the economic imperatives of Hollywood, Ulmer was exceedingly well-equipped to handle Detour's desperate fatalism. The film's grim acceptance of a malignant fate, its deliberate mockery of some of the more facile American myths, its singular admixture of the banal and the bizarre surely reflect the director's belief in the existence of the illusion of free choice, not the substance of free will. It is hardly surprising LETTERS The list of films I managed to see in 1975 was severely lacking due to my place of residence at that time. Now, once again, I'm one of Seattle's avid bargain-matinee attenders and popcorn freaks. Meanwhile, here's my list of ten best (purely subjective, as usual): A Brief Vacation, One Flew 0 ver the Cuckoo's Nest, The Passenger,Alice Doesn't Live Here Anymore, A Woman under the Influence, Man in a Glass Booth, The Mother and the Whore, Hearts and Minds, Antonia, Nashville. An older, very likeable film I saw for the first time in '75, and definitely worth mentioning, is Thieveslike Us. • Ann Baxter Here is a list of my ten favorites among the movies I first saw in 1975. As you'll notice, I don't count so good, though I can list things in proper alphabetical order: The Civil War (John Ford segment of How the West Was Won, 1962), Detour (Edgar G. Ulmer, 1946), Forty Guns (Sam Fuller, 1957), Four Sons (Ford, 1928), French Cancan (Jean Renoir, 1954), Gun Crazy (Joseph H. Lewis, 1949), Make Way for Tomorrow (Leo McCarey, 1937), Nashville, Out of the Past (Jacques Tourneur, 1947), The Passenger, Raw Deal (Anthony Mann, 1948), The Shanghai Gesture (Josef von Sternberg, 1941), The Tarnished Angels (Douglas Sirk,1958). On the negative side, all recent films paled beside the terribleness of The Terror of Tiny Town, a 1933 musical western with an all-midget cast. It sounded so funny in the catalogue (HA unique western adventure that is definitely 'campy' H) I couldn't resist. From now on I'll stick to Bedtime for Bonzo and Here Come the Nelsons. David Coursen • Eugene,Oregon Seattle premieres, 1975: The Four Musketeers (Lester), The Godfather, Part Two (Coppola) [Seattle 1974 =Ed.}, Autobiography of a Princess (James Ivory), Farewell My Lovely (Dick Richards), Young Frankenstein (Mel Brooks), Jaws (Spielberg), Night Moves (Penn). Personal premieres, 1975: Dodsworth (William Wyler, 1936), Curse of the Cat People (Gunther Fritsch and Robert that he made of this project perhaps the finest of his ten-day wonders, a forceful and compelling articulation of a distinctive world-view. a David Coursen has been involved in film programming and film education in the Eugene, Oregon area. His article on John Ford's Judge Priest and The Sun Shines Bright appeared in <strong>MOVIETONE</strong> NEWS 42. Wise, 1944), The Little Foxes (Wyler, 1941), Kiss Me Deadly (Robert Aldrich, 1955), Secret Agent (Alfred Hitchcock, 1936), Underworld U.S.A. (Sam Fuller, 1961), Unfaithfully Yours (Preston Sturges, 1948), Wuthering Heights (Wyler, 1939). Grace A. Cumbow Olympia .' Worst: A Boy and His Dog Best: Les Violons du bal Most Overrated: Nashville Hello. • Here' are ten that I liked from 1975: Nashville, Le Petit-Th6tJtre de Jean Renoir, The Man Who Would Be King, The Wind and the Lion, A Brief Vacation, French Connection II, Rancho Deluxe, Arabian Nightst Is for Faket (Welles), Smile. (Pasof inil , F In addition, I came upon severalspecial older films for the first time, including: Moulin Rouge (John Huston), The Killers (Don Siegel), 'The Leopard (Visconti), Love in the Afternoon (Billy Wilder), Meet John Doe (Capra). I appreciate the opportunity to submit this list. It gives me another chance to recall some very special images. • I missedsome, but those I saw: Tom Huckin Sincerely, Michael P. McKinnon Tacoma Nashville, The Man Who Would Be King, A Brief Vacation, Hustle, A Woman under the Influence, Le Petit-ThI!fJtre de Jean Renoir, Alice Doesn't Live Here Anymore, The Wind and the Lion. Seen fo he first time in '75-outstanding: Klute (Alan Pakula, 1971), Day for Night (Truffaut, 1973), The Last Tango in Paris (Bertolucci, 1974), Tiger Shark (Hawks, 1932), Scarface (Hawks,1932). Veleda T. Pierre 19 "I J
Page 1 and 2: ~-~-~--~---------------------- MOVI
Page 3 and 4: [I]@\'!l@[J' [ID@0®[J'@ ~[J'@~@ITi
Page 5 and 6: William K. Howard as a prosecuting
Page 7 and 8: and been sentenced to die, the frie
Page 9 and 10: photos this page: Museum of Modern
Page 11 and 12: The Seattle Film Society is proud t
Page 13 and 14: 1).C).ll. liNI) rl'lll~ NCtrl'ICtNC
Page 15 and 16: cannot be distinguished from them.
Page 20 and 21: IN BLACK & WHITE "8" MOVIES. By Don
Page 22 and 23: I I I · Geduld picks up the story'
Page 24 and 25: ," I I \ I Emlyn Williams, Robert N
Page 26 and 27: 'II I Clark and Susan Tyrrell are,
Page 28 and 29: operates in relation to the key the
Page 30 and 31: -- .. - - ~- - ...., _~ !_---:;n -
Page 32 and 33: MOVIETONE NEW8 "The best publicatio
Page 34 and 35: One Flew over the Cuckoo's Nest: Ja
Page 36 and 37: , I , I with the kinds of people he
Page 38 and 39: 'I payroll robbery at a nickel plan
Page 40 and 41: individualized perception (can thre
Page 42: . -",.'~ 6EATILE FILM 60Clt:'I'Y 52

MOVIETONE NEW8 . - Parallax View Annex

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?