MOVIETONE NEW8 . - Parallax View Annex
MOVIETONE NEW8 . - Parallax View Annex
MOVIETONE NEW8 . - Parallax View Annex
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
, I<br />
, I<br />
with the kinds of people he has populated the screen with.<br />
Many of those people weren't actors before Forman started<br />
rolling the camera down in Ken Kesey's neck of the Oregon<br />
woods, and one might easily anticipate such an arrangement<br />
leading to a tension between the tentativeness in the way<br />
nonprofessionals grope for their roles and the director's<br />
attempt to capitalize on their hopefully unpretentious<br />
behavior in front of the camera. To a point, Forman does let<br />
the actors' roughhewnness work towards a more "realistic"<br />
flavoring, much in the same way that Cassavetes, using<br />
nonprofessionals, can coax forth performances that seem<br />
natural and, usually, painful evolutions of dialogue and<br />
emotion. But Forman's frequent use of facial close shots<br />
(comparable to Cassavetes as much as to Bergman) doesn't<br />
just serve to index emotional intensity, nor are those faces<br />
coldly scrutinized as though one side of the screen (or<br />
camera) had nothing to do with the other. Instead, Forman<br />
tends to explore his characters in a way that makes it appear<br />
that the actors are taking a large hand in defining the roles<br />
they play (which in fact they are) while the director eclipses<br />
himself to the extent of encouraging spontaneity and trying<br />
to have the camera pointed in the right direction when<br />
something flickers between the characters.<br />
But it's never quite that simple. Forman's use of a<br />
nonprofessional cast probably does contribute to some of the<br />
unstudied-seeming portrayals. It's the director's efforts,<br />
though, that makes those portrayals an interconnected<br />
whole. Especially in the group therapy sessions where<br />
intercut reactions form an important integrating thread in the<br />
ebb and flow of temper and sympathy, Forman, like<br />
Cassavetes, is particularly concerned with creating a credible<br />
totality of interrelationships from which the camera can pick<br />
and choose the nuanced supporting bit as well as the central<br />
THE MAGIC FLUTE<br />
continued from page 33<br />
film's most delightful achievements: to<br />
have us thinking, by the time it's all<br />
over, that all the seemingly different<br />
shadings of both Bergman's and our<br />
perception finally rotate in the penumbra<br />
of Art. In other guises, maybe<br />
that has been Bergman's "message" all<br />
along. The kingdom, though, is not<br />
self-enclosed this time, as it was in<br />
Cries and Whispers, nor is there that<br />
sometimes uneasily taut polarization<br />
between the stiflingly realistic overtones<br />
and the undercurrents of pure<br />
poetry running through the dialogue of<br />
Scenes from a Marriage. Nor, for that<br />
matter, is there much hint of existential<br />
parlor tricks a la Passion of Anna,<br />
wherein each of the four main characters,<br />
at some point during the movie,<br />
takes a moment to sit back, not as the<br />
character he/she portrays but as the<br />
performer he/she is, and reflect upon<br />
the part's genesis within him-/herself.<br />
The closest Bergman comes to anything<br />
like that in The Magic Flute is<br />
when Erland Josephson's face is momentarily<br />
caught among the members<br />
of the audience that Nykvist's camera<br />
is doing its best to transform into an<br />
expressive visual counterpart of Mozart's<br />
musical overture. There is no real<br />
point to be made. Josephson is simply<br />
there to hear The Magic Flute like the<br />
rest of them. And yet one can't help<br />
but feel a twinge of life-meets-art headiness<br />
at seeing a regular Bergman actor<br />
-and sometime writing collaboratorin<br />
a Bergman movie watching Bergman<br />
make that movie while at the same<br />
time partaking of the emotions and<br />
responses contained within it, and<br />
hopefully extending beyond it, touching<br />
the surface of our own expectations<br />
of art. for during that opening<br />
performance of focal dialogue. With Cassavetes, however, this<br />
actual uncertainty as to what's going to happen next, where<br />
the camera will go now, is tied to a strong feeling of<br />
improvisation that Forman only infrequently tries to bring<br />
off, usually with Nicholson in the immediate vicinity. In one<br />
scene early in the movie it works particularly well. Me-<br />
Murphy has just arrived and has already had a chance to<br />
threaten the subdued ambience of the ward while strolling<br />
around a group of card-playing patients who are trying to<br />
pass a quiet morning. Now he's meeting for the first time<br />
with Dr. Spivey; Spivey starts asking those deceptively<br />
amiable, condescendingly frank questions- "Why do you<br />
think you're here, McMurphy?"-when McMurphy notices a<br />
photograph of the doctor holding a huge chinook salmon by<br />
a chain. McMurphy starts asking questions about it, and the<br />
doctor, perhaps sensing an opening for "communication"<br />
with his patient, follows right along. The whole thing is<br />
slightly ridiculous: McMurphy ends up wondering if they<br />
weighed the chain as well. It works, however, because,<br />
whether it was carefully scripted or not, the halting,<br />
exploratory way in which they run through it makes it seem<br />
freshly and refreshingly improvised, especially in contrast to<br />
some lines that come a moment later during the interview<br />
-lines nudging almost uncomfortably at some kind of Big<br />
Theme about the relativity of madness and violent behavior<br />
("Rocky Marciano knocked out 40 guys and he ain't in jail").<br />
Laid out in such cutely paradoxical terms, the point seems<br />
too easily digestible, again perhaps because it's enclosed<br />
within that point of view-McMurphy's point of view-that<br />
we're sometimes led to accept at face value without closely<br />
examining the less palatable underside of McMurphy's selfdestructive<br />
temperament.<br />
Rick Hermann<br />
sequence of briefly-glimpsed faces<br />
something happens, or should happen,<br />
to us: as we watch an audience listening<br />
to the overture of The Magic Flute,<br />
our act of seeing comprises an overture<br />
in itself. We are struck with the perhaps<br />
obvious but nevertheless suddenly<br />
reaffirmed importance of what it can<br />
mean to people to sit before a work of<br />
art and derive meaning, pleasure, and<br />
sustenance from it. In that sense the<br />
audience in the movie certainly mirrors<br />
the audience in the movie theatre-or<br />
hopefully does so; but the image is not<br />
so much a simple reflection as it is a<br />
distillation and translation of something<br />
we are seeing into something<br />
essentially about what we see. The<br />
people in The Magic Flute's audience<br />
arc not just there, but there radiating<br />
all the variables of complexity, wonder,<br />
and even (maybe especially) innocence<br />
that ought to define what it