11.11.2012 Views

MOVIETONE NEW8 . - Parallax View Annex

MOVIETONE NEW8 . - Parallax View Annex

MOVIETONE NEW8 . - Parallax View Annex

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

, I<br />

, I<br />

with the kinds of people he has populated the screen with.<br />

Many of those people weren't actors before Forman started<br />

rolling the camera down in Ken Kesey's neck of the Oregon<br />

woods, and one might easily anticipate such an arrangement<br />

leading to a tension between the tentativeness in the way<br />

nonprofessionals grope for their roles and the director's<br />

attempt to capitalize on their hopefully unpretentious<br />

behavior in front of the camera. To a point, Forman does let<br />

the actors' roughhewnness work towards a more "realistic"<br />

flavoring, much in the same way that Cassavetes, using<br />

nonprofessionals, can coax forth performances that seem<br />

natural and, usually, painful evolutions of dialogue and<br />

emotion. But Forman's frequent use of facial close shots<br />

(comparable to Cassavetes as much as to Bergman) doesn't<br />

just serve to index emotional intensity, nor are those faces<br />

coldly scrutinized as though one side of the screen (or<br />

camera) had nothing to do with the other. Instead, Forman<br />

tends to explore his characters in a way that makes it appear<br />

that the actors are taking a large hand in defining the roles<br />

they play (which in fact they are) while the director eclipses<br />

himself to the extent of encouraging spontaneity and trying<br />

to have the camera pointed in the right direction when<br />

something flickers between the characters.<br />

But it's never quite that simple. Forman's use of a<br />

nonprofessional cast probably does contribute to some of the<br />

unstudied-seeming portrayals. It's the director's efforts,<br />

though, that makes those portrayals an interconnected<br />

whole. Especially in the group therapy sessions where<br />

intercut reactions form an important integrating thread in the<br />

ebb and flow of temper and sympathy, Forman, like<br />

Cassavetes, is particularly concerned with creating a credible<br />

totality of interrelationships from which the camera can pick<br />

and choose the nuanced supporting bit as well as the central<br />

THE MAGIC FLUTE<br />

continued from page 33<br />

film's most delightful achievements: to<br />

have us thinking, by the time it's all<br />

over, that all the seemingly different<br />

shadings of both Bergman's and our<br />

perception finally rotate in the penumbra<br />

of Art. In other guises, maybe<br />

that has been Bergman's "message" all<br />

along. The kingdom, though, is not<br />

self-enclosed this time, as it was in<br />

Cries and Whispers, nor is there that<br />

sometimes uneasily taut polarization<br />

between the stiflingly realistic overtones<br />

and the undercurrents of pure<br />

poetry running through the dialogue of<br />

Scenes from a Marriage. Nor, for that<br />

matter, is there much hint of existential<br />

parlor tricks a la Passion of Anna,<br />

wherein each of the four main characters,<br />

at some point during the movie,<br />

takes a moment to sit back, not as the<br />

character he/she portrays but as the<br />

performer he/she is, and reflect upon<br />

the part's genesis within him-/herself.<br />

The closest Bergman comes to anything<br />

like that in The Magic Flute is<br />

when Erland Josephson's face is momentarily<br />

caught among the members<br />

of the audience that Nykvist's camera<br />

is doing its best to transform into an<br />

expressive visual counterpart of Mozart's<br />

musical overture. There is no real<br />

point to be made. Josephson is simply<br />

there to hear The Magic Flute like the<br />

rest of them. And yet one can't help<br />

but feel a twinge of life-meets-art headiness<br />

at seeing a regular Bergman actor<br />

-and sometime writing collaboratorin<br />

a Bergman movie watching Bergman<br />

make that movie while at the same<br />

time partaking of the emotions and<br />

responses contained within it, and<br />

hopefully extending beyond it, touching<br />

the surface of our own expectations<br />

of art. for during that opening<br />

performance of focal dialogue. With Cassavetes, however, this<br />

actual uncertainty as to what's going to happen next, where<br />

the camera will go now, is tied to a strong feeling of<br />

improvisation that Forman only infrequently tries to bring<br />

off, usually with Nicholson in the immediate vicinity. In one<br />

scene early in the movie it works particularly well. Me-<br />

Murphy has just arrived and has already had a chance to<br />

threaten the subdued ambience of the ward while strolling<br />

around a group of card-playing patients who are trying to<br />

pass a quiet morning. Now he's meeting for the first time<br />

with Dr. Spivey; Spivey starts asking those deceptively<br />

amiable, condescendingly frank questions- "Why do you<br />

think you're here, McMurphy?"-when McMurphy notices a<br />

photograph of the doctor holding a huge chinook salmon by<br />

a chain. McMurphy starts asking questions about it, and the<br />

doctor, perhaps sensing an opening for "communication"<br />

with his patient, follows right along. The whole thing is<br />

slightly ridiculous: McMurphy ends up wondering if they<br />

weighed the chain as well. It works, however, because,<br />

whether it was carefully scripted or not, the halting,<br />

exploratory way in which they run through it makes it seem<br />

freshly and refreshingly improvised, especially in contrast to<br />

some lines that come a moment later during the interview<br />

-lines nudging almost uncomfortably at some kind of Big<br />

Theme about the relativity of madness and violent behavior<br />

("Rocky Marciano knocked out 40 guys and he ain't in jail").<br />

Laid out in such cutely paradoxical terms, the point seems<br />

too easily digestible, again perhaps because it's enclosed<br />

within that point of view-McMurphy's point of view-that<br />

we're sometimes led to accept at face value without closely<br />

examining the less palatable underside of McMurphy's selfdestructive<br />

temperament.<br />

Rick Hermann<br />

sequence of briefly-glimpsed faces<br />

something happens, or should happen,<br />

to us: as we watch an audience listening<br />

to the overture of The Magic Flute,<br />

our act of seeing comprises an overture<br />

in itself. We are struck with the perhaps<br />

obvious but nevertheless suddenly<br />

reaffirmed importance of what it can<br />

mean to people to sit before a work of<br />

art and derive meaning, pleasure, and<br />

sustenance from it. In that sense the<br />

audience in the movie certainly mirrors<br />

the audience in the movie theatre-or<br />

hopefully does so; but the image is not<br />

so much a simple reflection as it is a<br />

distillation and translation of something<br />

we are seeing into something<br />

essentially about what we see. The<br />

people in The Magic Flute's audience<br />

arc not just there, but there radiating<br />

all the variables of complexity, wonder,<br />

and even (maybe especially) innocence<br />

that ought to define what it

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!