11.01.2015 Views

Tested: SolarWorld Sunmodule Plus SW 245 poly ... - PV Magazine

Tested: SolarWorld Sunmodule Plus SW 245 poly ... - PV Magazine

Tested: SolarWorld Sunmodule Plus SW 245 poly ... - PV Magazine

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

News<br />

<strong>SolarWorld</strong> in <strong>PV</strong>+Test 2.0<br />

Two other modules underwent the module<br />

test by TÜV Rheinland in Germany–<br />

one of the world leading companies for<br />

safety, standardisation and certification<br />

– and Solarpraxis AG, the publisher of<br />

pv magazine. The <strong>SolarWorld</strong> module<br />

“<strong>Sunmodule</strong> <strong>Plus</strong> <strong>SW</strong> <strong>245</strong> <strong>poly</strong>” was evaluated<br />

in the test as “very good.” Meanwhile,<br />

another module that got tested received<br />

only a “satisfactory” judgment.<br />

The two modules were the first to undergo<br />

the new test procedure <strong>PV</strong>+Test 2.0.<br />

Compared to the valid test conditions<br />

from February 2011, the new procedure<br />

included more stringent criteria when<br />

it came to testing resistance to aging as<br />

well as, among other things, a test for potential<br />

induced degradation (PID), and<br />

more precise determination of low light<br />

and temperature behavior. Since the test<br />

has a “best of” list, the manufacturers are<br />

able to decide against having their names<br />

published in the case of poor test results.<br />

The manufacturer with the module that<br />

<strong>Tested</strong>: <strong>SolarWorld</strong> <strong>Sunmodule</strong> <strong>Plus</strong> <strong>SW</strong> <strong>245</strong> <strong>poly</strong><br />

The <strong>Sunmodule</strong> <strong>Plus</strong> <strong>SW</strong> <strong>245</strong> <strong>poly</strong>, according<br />

to manufacturer <strong>SolarWorld</strong> AG,<br />

is suitable for all applications. It is available<br />

in performance classes of 240 to 255<br />

watts. The tested module type with a <strong>245</strong><br />

watt nominal capacity has been in production<br />

since 2010. Until now, around 860,000<br />

modules in this power class with a total<br />

capacity of about 211 MW have been sold<br />

largely in Europe, but also in the U.S., Asia,<br />

Australia, South America and other parts<br />

of the world, according to <strong>SolarWorld</strong>. For<br />

the U.S., the module is fitted with the appropriate<br />

frame.<br />

The <strong>Sunmodule</strong> <strong>Plus</strong> <strong>SW</strong> <strong>poly</strong> is the most<br />

sold product type from <strong>SolarWorld</strong>: this<br />

being the reason why the company sent<br />

this module for the <strong>PV</strong>+Test. Additionally<br />

a standard module without further specifications<br />

was selected to allow the best possible<br />

comparison of results. The front of<br />

the module is fitted with a 4 mm thick, unstructured,<br />

highly transparent, tempered<br />

solar glass. According to <strong>SolarWorld</strong>, it has<br />

been proved<br />

time and<br />

again to be<br />

PID-free,<br />

ammonia<br />

and salt-mist<br />

resistant and<br />

also suited for deserts. It has also been ensured,<br />

via the “Power Controlled” program<br />

by TÜV Rheinland, that the measured<br />

power of the module is correct and<br />

the quality remains steady over time.<br />

Photo: <strong>SolarWorld</strong> AG<br />

Made in<br />

Size<br />

Weight<br />

Cell type<br />

Module type<br />

Solarworld<br />

<strong>Sunmodule</strong> <strong>Plus</strong> <strong>SW</strong> <strong>245</strong><br />

Germany<br />

1675 x 1001 x 31 mm<br />

21.2 kg<br />

Polycrystalline<br />

Specified performance <strong>245</strong> watts<br />

Output tolerance (negative, positive, in percent)<br />

Glass/EVA/cell/EVA/foil<br />

- Type plate: +/- 3%<br />

- Datasheet: -0 Wp, +5 Wp (with +/- 2% tolerance)<br />

Individual evaluation<br />

Performance 20% ++<br />

Aging behavior 25% ++<br />

Documentation 15% +++<br />

Electrical safety 25% +++<br />

Workmanship 10% +++<br />

Warranty and ease of installation 5% +++<br />

Results within the requirements of IEC 61215 and IEC 61730 Yes<br />

Overall evaluation (maximum 100 points) 92.294<br />

Score Very good<br />

The overall evaluation is based on numerous measurements by TÜV Rheinland – a German safety standards authority – that are not all included in the table.<br />

Each measurement is evaluated with a score between zero and ten and is weighted differently in the overall result. Test procedure and weighting were<br />

decided by the industry advisory committee. More information is available at: www.pv-magazine.com/pv-test<br />

Scoring system<br />

<strong>Tested</strong> modules: very good very good (-) good (+) good good (-) satisfactory (+) satisfactory sufficient unsatisfactory<br />

21 2 3 6 5 1 0 3 1 0<br />

8<br />

05 / 2013 | www.pv-magazine.com


was deemed “satisfactory” chose this option. The <strong>SolarWorld</strong><br />

module was judged as “good” when it came to performance<br />

parameters. The deviation of the measured performance from<br />

that indicated was totally acceptable, as were the temperature<br />

and low light behaviors. The valuation for these were no longer<br />

determined only by an irradiation of 200 watts/m 2 , but rather<br />

a matrix of various irradiation conditions and temperatures<br />

based on the International Electrotechnical Commission standard<br />

IEC 61853. The data is weighted in a way that corresponds<br />

to typical irradiation conditions in Germany, so that the evaluation<br />

allows for conclusions with regards to yield behavior.<br />

The <strong>SolarWorld</strong> module results in this partial evaluation were<br />

“good.” Those of the other module were only “sufficient.” The<br />

<strong>SolarWorld</strong> module also finished with “good” in the PID test.<br />

Particularly worthy of mention is the workmanship of the module,<br />

which is completely without defect. S<br />

<br />

Michael Fuhs<br />

In the June edition of pv magazine we will report extensively on<br />

the two modules and the new test conditions which the test subjects<br />

have to endure under <strong>PV</strong>+Test 2.0.<br />

Photo: TÜV Rheinland<br />

Advertisement<br />

For module purchasers<br />

The complete summary table with all of the test results and<br />

explanations can be found here<br />

www.pv-magazine.com/pv-test<br />

Homepage of the module test<br />

www.pvtest.de/index_en.html<br />

Your module in <strong>PV</strong>+Test<br />

Contact for manufacturers:<br />

Michaela Fischbach: michaela.fischbach@solarpraxis.de<br />

Andreas Cox: cox@de.tuv.com<br />

05 / 2013 | www.pv-magazine.com

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!