ALI-ABA Course of Study Commercial Real Estate Defaults ...
ALI-ABA Course of Study Commercial Real Estate Defaults ...
ALI-ABA Course of Study Commercial Real Estate Defaults ...
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
80<br />
3.6.5 Claims to Unpaid Proceeds and Retainage Under Construction<br />
Contract.<br />
State law will determine whether or not earned but unpaid construction<br />
consideration and retainage are assets <strong>of</strong> a debtor in a Bankruptcy Code<br />
proceeding. 60 Payments held by the federal government as owner <strong>of</strong> a<br />
construction project do not become part <strong>of</strong> the bankruptcy estate and, as a<br />
result, may be available to a bonding company or other claimants such as<br />
subcontractors. 61 Language <strong>of</strong> contracts may determine relative rights <strong>of</strong><br />
the parties to undisbursed contract proceeds. 62<br />
3.7 Permits, Governmental Licenses and Approvals, Zoning, Subdivision,<br />
Environmental and Other Land Use Documentation.<br />
Review documents and opinion letters to be sure the mortgaged property is zoned<br />
for current intended use and that the current or intended use is authorized as<br />
required by local law. A mortgagee's taking title by a foreclosure or deed in lieu<br />
there<strong>of</strong> to improperly permitted property may subject the lender or its personnel to<br />
civil or in some cases to criminal proceedings.<br />
3.8 Title Insurance Policy and Marked Up Title Report or Commitment. 63<br />
3.8.1 Review<br />
Was policy actually issued Is the policy as issued consistent with marked<br />
up report Any special endorsements Compare title policy descriptions<br />
with closing documents. Compare a current title report with the policy<br />
issued for closing.<br />
3.8.2 Liability Theories<br />
It has been held that a title insurer may be held liable for failure to disclose<br />
a title defect <strong>of</strong> which it has knowledge even if the defect is <strong>of</strong> the type<br />
excluded by the terms <strong>of</strong> the policy. 64<br />
60 Universal Bonding Ins. Co. v. Gittens & Sprinkle Enterprises,. Inc., 960 F.2d 366 (3rd Cir. N.J. 1992); Mullins v.<br />
Burtch, 249 B.R. 360 (D. Del. 2000) Criticized at 368 although it is followed in part at 371.<br />
61 Pearlman v. Reliance Insurance Co., 371 US 132 (1962). 9 L.Ed 2d 190, 83 S.Ct., 232. See also, North Am.<br />
Speciality Ins. Co. v. Chichester Sch. Dist., 2000 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 10745 (E.D. Pa. 2000), Ins. Co. v. United States,<br />
243 F.3d 1367, 1375 (Fed.Cir. 2001).<br />
62 See In re Modular Structures, Inc., 27 F.3d 72 (3rd Cir. N.J.1994); Pics No. 94-0899; Stevlee Factors, Inc. v. State,<br />
136 N.J.Super 461, 346 A.2d 624 (N.J. Super. Ct. 1975).<br />
63 See discussion also at Item 1.6.<br />
64 Crawford v. Safeco Title Ins. Co., 585 So.2d 952 (Ct. <strong>of</strong> App. 1st Dist. 1991).<br />
16<br />
DSC:767996.2<br />
4/4/2006 3:55 PM Copyright 1996 - 2002 Marvin Garfinkel<br />
All Rights Reserved