11.01.2015 Views

ALI-ABA Course of Study Commercial Real Estate Defaults ...

ALI-ABA Course of Study Commercial Real Estate Defaults ...

ALI-ABA Course of Study Commercial Real Estate Defaults ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

80<br />

3.6.5 Claims to Unpaid Proceeds and Retainage Under Construction<br />

Contract.<br />

State law will determine whether or not earned but unpaid construction<br />

consideration and retainage are assets <strong>of</strong> a debtor in a Bankruptcy Code<br />

proceeding. 60 Payments held by the federal government as owner <strong>of</strong> a<br />

construction project do not become part <strong>of</strong> the bankruptcy estate and, as a<br />

result, may be available to a bonding company or other claimants such as<br />

subcontractors. 61 Language <strong>of</strong> contracts may determine relative rights <strong>of</strong><br />

the parties to undisbursed contract proceeds. 62<br />

3.7 Permits, Governmental Licenses and Approvals, Zoning, Subdivision,<br />

Environmental and Other Land Use Documentation.<br />

Review documents and opinion letters to be sure the mortgaged property is zoned<br />

for current intended use and that the current or intended use is authorized as<br />

required by local law. A mortgagee's taking title by a foreclosure or deed in lieu<br />

there<strong>of</strong> to improperly permitted property may subject the lender or its personnel to<br />

civil or in some cases to criminal proceedings.<br />

3.8 Title Insurance Policy and Marked Up Title Report or Commitment. 63<br />

3.8.1 Review<br />

Was policy actually issued Is the policy as issued consistent with marked<br />

up report Any special endorsements Compare title policy descriptions<br />

with closing documents. Compare a current title report with the policy<br />

issued for closing.<br />

3.8.2 Liability Theories<br />

It has been held that a title insurer may be held liable for failure to disclose<br />

a title defect <strong>of</strong> which it has knowledge even if the defect is <strong>of</strong> the type<br />

excluded by the terms <strong>of</strong> the policy. 64<br />

60 Universal Bonding Ins. Co. v. Gittens & Sprinkle Enterprises,. Inc., 960 F.2d 366 (3rd Cir. N.J. 1992); Mullins v.<br />

Burtch, 249 B.R. 360 (D. Del. 2000) Criticized at 368 although it is followed in part at 371.<br />

61 Pearlman v. Reliance Insurance Co., 371 US 132 (1962). 9 L.Ed 2d 190, 83 S.Ct., 232. See also, North Am.<br />

Speciality Ins. Co. v. Chichester Sch. Dist., 2000 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 10745 (E.D. Pa. 2000), Ins. Co. v. United States,<br />

243 F.3d 1367, 1375 (Fed.Cir. 2001).<br />

62 See In re Modular Structures, Inc., 27 F.3d 72 (3rd Cir. N.J.1994); Pics No. 94-0899; Stevlee Factors, Inc. v. State,<br />

136 N.J.Super 461, 346 A.2d 624 (N.J. Super. Ct. 1975).<br />

63 See discussion also at Item 1.6.<br />

64 Crawford v. Safeco Title Ins. Co., 585 So.2d 952 (Ct. <strong>of</strong> App. 1st Dist. 1991).<br />

16<br />

DSC:767996.2<br />

4/4/2006 3:55 PM Copyright 1996 - 2002 Marvin Garfinkel<br />

All Rights Reserved

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!