12.01.2015 Views

MAGAZINE - Copa-Cogeca

MAGAZINE - Copa-Cogeca

MAGAZINE - Copa-Cogeca

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

April 2012 │ 9<br />

Peter Pascher, Chairman of the EU Comissions Rural<br />

Development Advisory Group , welcomed in an interview<br />

many aspects of EU Commission proposals on Rural<br />

Development Policy under the future Common Agricultural<br />

Policy (CAP). But he expressed major concerns about<br />

proposed criteria for a new delimitation of less favoured areas<br />

(LFA), warning it will be a disaster for some Member States.<br />

He also highlighted the need to reduce red tape under the<br />

proposals.<br />

Mr Pascher stressed “Overall,<br />

we favour the Commissions’<br />

approach on future EU<br />

rural development policy. In<br />

particular we like the move<br />

from the ‘axis’ approach to<br />

a thematic approach under<br />

the Rural Development<br />

Policy proposals. We think this will give Member States or<br />

regions more flexibility to take account of their own specific<br />

conditions. We also support the new and further developed<br />

measures, such as knowledge and innovation transfer and<br />

cooperation measures. We welcome the new European<br />

Innovation Partnership which will bring together farmers,<br />

advisors and researchers”.<br />

But we are very worried about the review of LFA whereby<br />

much of the previous LFAs would lose their status and others<br />

would gain. “We don’t know how we can explain this to<br />

Many aspects of future EU rural<br />

development policy proposals welcomed<br />

but serious concerns over IFA review,<br />

Peter Pascher chairman of commission<br />

advisory group “rural development”<br />

stresses<br />

farmers or taxpayers”, he said. <strong>Copa</strong>-<strong>Cogeca</strong> urges Ministers to<br />

take into account its proposals and hopes Council and MEPs<br />

will agree on a delimitation of LFAs which is comprehensible<br />

and takes in account the real difficulties in land management.<br />

He continued “We also have serious concerns about<br />

Commission proposals to further green the CAP and make<br />

30% of farmers direct payment dependent upon complying<br />

with environmental conditions. It increases the burden on<br />

farmers significantly and raises farm costs or diminishs farm<br />

receipts, reducing their competitive position. For example, it<br />

is very difficult for many farmers to grow 3 crops for climatic<br />

or agronomic reasons. If this measure remained under the<br />

second pillar of the CAP, farmers would be able to decide<br />

voluntarily whether to do it, promoted with a premium, or<br />

whether to choose other measures”. <strong>Copa</strong>-<strong>Cogeca</strong> is calling<br />

for measures to encourage “green growth”. For example,<br />

measures which help farmers achieve resource efficiency – to<br />

use less water, fossil energy and fertilizers - such as precision<br />

farming. That way farmers benefit from reduced costs, they<br />

maintain production but they also benefit the environment.<br />

Or measures to encourage more bio-energy production<br />

including the use of residues.<br />

<strong>Copa</strong>-<strong>Cogeca</strong> is calling for a<br />

specific article under Rural<br />

Development on green growth<br />

measures, just as there is a<br />

specific article for animal<br />

welfare and so on. “We<br />

meanwhile welcome the 7<br />

specific articles on forestry even<br />

if some improvements are needed”, he added.<br />

Mr Pascher went on to highlight the need to simplify the<br />

Leader initiative, which aims to encourage sustainable<br />

development in the region, saying it takes too much time<br />

for many farmers and needs to become more attractive<br />

for entrepreneurs in order to become effective and more<br />

sustainable.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!