13.01.2015 Views

Scanning Electron Microscopy - Gbhenterprises.com

Scanning Electron Microscopy - Gbhenterprises.com

Scanning Electron Microscopy - Gbhenterprises.com

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Materials Testing<br />

<strong>Scanning</strong> <strong>Electron</strong><br />

<strong>Microscopy</strong><br />

Test No.: M604<br />

Aim: Explanation of the basics of scanning electron microscopy using surfaces of fractures as an<br />

example.<br />

Comparison and analysis of differing fracture behaviour of metallic and polymeric materials<br />

by means of scanning electron microscopy.<br />

Contents<br />

1 Introduction<br />

1.1 Limitations of light-optical microscopy<br />

2 Basics<br />

2.1 <strong>Microscopy</strong> by employing electron beams<br />

2.2 Interaction between electrons and specimen<br />

2.2.1 Secondary electrons (SE)<br />

2.2.2 Back scattered electrons (BSE)<br />

2.3 <strong>Scanning</strong> electron microscope (SEM): Design and function<br />

2.3.1 Signal-producing system<br />

2.3.1.1 Generation of the probe<br />

2.3.1.2 Lens system<br />

2.3.1.3 <strong>Scanning</strong> system / magnification<br />

2.3.2 Signal-processing system<br />

2.3.3 Detectors<br />

2.4 Interrelationship between depth of focus, resolution, and magnification<br />

2.5 Fractographic analysis<br />

2.5.1 Transgranular and intercrystalline fracture<br />

3 Technological significance<br />

3.1 Assessment of damage<br />

3.2 Quality assurance and quality control<br />

3.3 Medical examination and biological investigation<br />

4 Testing<br />

5 Evaluation of testing<br />

6 Questions<br />

7 Bibliography


Test M604: <strong>Scanning</strong> electron microscopy<br />

1 Introduction<br />

Minor defects often result in considerable damage. Small fractures or cracks in materials can have<br />

disastrous effects on the stability of buildings, tools, etc. Once an accident has happened, its<br />

causes have to be found. A microscope examination of the fracture surface shows whether a<br />

material defect or a processing defect has caused the fracture. Light-optical and electron-optical<br />

microscopes are used for this purpose. <strong>Electron</strong> microscopes are advantageous in that a high<br />

degree of magnification as well as an excellent depth of focus (Fig.1) can be achieved. As a rule,<br />

surfaces of fracture are very rough so that a light-optical microscope often cannot produce a<br />

sufficiently clear enlargement of the relevant image section.<br />

Fig. 1: Photo of blood corpuscles taken by means of a) a light-optical microscope and b) an electron-optical<br />

microscope (same magnification).<br />

1.1 Limitations of light-optical microscopy<br />

The amount of information a micrograph can provide is dependent on resolution. The maximum<br />

resolution that can be achieved using a microscope means the smallest interval distinguishable<br />

between two adjacent points. Any magnification exceeding such maximum would not make sense<br />

since further information cannot be provided.<br />

The maximum resolution mainly depends on the wavelength of the radiation selected for the<br />

image. Beams entering the lens- and aperture system of the microscope produce overlapping<br />

diffraction patterns for each object point. The distance r 1<br />

between two diffraction maxima must<br />

exceed full width half maximum (FWHM), otherwise the diffraction maxima cannot be discerned<br />

as being separate (Fig. 2). According to a simple rule found by Rayleigh, distinction is possible<br />

when the maximum of the zero order coincides with the first minimum of the second diffraction<br />

pattern. The distance between the two first minima d 1<br />

is inversely proportional to the diameter of<br />

the aperture.<br />

2


Test M604: <strong>Scanning</strong> electron microscopy<br />

Fig. 2: Minimal distance between two diffraction maxima still projected separately<br />

Diffraction patterns are dependent on the wavelength λ, on the index of refraction of the<br />

surrounding medium µ, and on the angle α formed by the optical axis and the edge beam, which<br />

can only just pass through the aperture. For r 1<br />

results:<br />

1<br />

0,61λ<br />

r<br />

1<br />

= d =<br />

(1)<br />

2 µ sinα<br />

The product µ sin α is referred to as numeric aperture.<br />

Thus, high resolution can be achieved by a short wavelength, a high index of refraction of the<br />

surrounding medium, and a short distance to the sample (hereinafter also referred to as<br />

"specimen") (wide angle α). When normal light-optical microscopes are used, the surrounding<br />

medium is air (µ = 1) and the distance between sample and lens cannot be decreased at discretion.<br />

For this reason, the maximum resolution with regard to wavelengths of visible light (400 - 700<br />

nm) is limited to about 200 nm, and any degree of magnification beyond 1000 would not make<br />

sense.<br />

2 Basics<br />

2.1 <strong>Microscopy</strong> by employing electron beams<br />

(Hereinafter the term "electron beam is also referred to as "probe"). If electrons are used instead<br />

of optical waves, much smaller wavelengths can be achieved. The wavelength can be varied<br />

depending on the voltage set to accelerate the electrons towards the sample. The velocity v of a<br />

single electron can almost reach the velocity of light c. In that case, relativistic corrections be<strong>com</strong>e<br />

necessary. The electron mass changes according to the following equation:<br />

me<br />

m =<br />

, ( 2 )<br />

1<br />

2 2<br />

⎡ ⎛ v ⎞ ⎤<br />

⎢1<br />

− ⎜ ⎟ ⎥<br />

⎢⎣<br />

⎝ c ⎠ ⎥⎦<br />

m e<br />

is the rest mass of the electron.<br />

The deBroglie relation determines the interrelationship between wavelength and momentum.<br />

h h λ = = , ( 3 )<br />

p mv<br />

h is Planck’s quantum (constant of action). The energy transmitted to an electron eV can be<br />

equated with the energy of relativistic mass changes:<br />

eV = m − m c<br />

(4)<br />

( ) 2<br />

e<br />

By means of these three equations the dependence of wavelength on accelerating voltage can be<br />

derived:<br />

3


Test M604: <strong>Scanning</strong> electron microscopy<br />

2<br />

2 h<br />

λ =<br />

(5)<br />

2 2<br />

⎛ 2eVm<br />

+ ⎞<br />

e<br />

e V<br />

⎜<br />

⎟<br />

2<br />

⎝ c ⎠<br />

⎡ 1,5 ⎤<br />

λ = ⎢<br />

nm<br />

6 2 ⎥<br />

(6)<br />

−<br />

⎣( V + 10 V ) ⎦<br />

An accelerating voltage of e.g. 20 kV results in 8.6E-3 nm = 8.6 pm, whereas at 500 kV only<br />

1.4E-3 nm are reached.<br />

Since electrons would be too strongly scattered in air, a high vacuum is required in an electron<br />

microscope. In addition, the samples to be tested have to be electrically conductive, otherwise they<br />

would be overcharged with electrons during irradiation. For this reason, conductors and insulators<br />

of inferior quality have to be coated with a conductive layer of metal or carbon prior to<br />

microscopic investigation.<br />

2.2 Interaction between electrons and specimen<br />

<strong>Electron</strong>s in scanning electron microscopes are accelerated at voltages in the range of 2 to 40 kV.<br />

An electron beam < 0.01µm in diameter is focused on the specimen. These fast primary electrons<br />

(PE) interact in various ways with the surface layers of the specimen. The zone, in which such<br />

interaction occurs, and in which different signals are produced, is called "interaction volume" or<br />

"electron – diffusion cloud". The size of the interaction volume is proportional to the energy of<br />

primary electrons, its shape is determined dependent upon scattering processes by the mean atomic<br />

number. Secondary electrons (SE), back scattered electrons (BSE), and absorbed electrons are<br />

produced, flowing off as specimen current. In addition, X-rays, Auger electrons, and<br />

cathodoluminescence are produced (Fig. 3).<br />

1<br />

2<br />

Fig. 3: Interaction volume<br />

R: The range of primary electrons (PE);<br />

T: Escape level for back scattered electrons (BSE)<br />

Resolution limit of BSE ≈ ½ R<br />

Resolution limit of X-radiation ≈ interaction volume<br />

Resolution limit of secondary fluorescence > interaction volume<br />

4


Test M604: <strong>Scanning</strong> electron microscopy<br />

2.2.1 Secondary electrons (SE)<br />

Although secondary electrons are produced in the entire interaction volume, they can only escape<br />

from surface layers (metals: max. 5mm, insulators: max. 50 mm, Fig. 4: Escape level t).<br />

Secondary electrons are very slow, their escape energy is ≤ 50 eV. Approximately half of all SE<br />

are produced very near to the point of impact of PE (SE1). Owing to back scattered electrons<br />

(BSE) diffusing in the specimen material, SE are also produced at a distance in the range of 0.1 to<br />

some µm to the point of impact (SE2). Back scattered electrons reacting with the wall of the<br />

specimen chamber are the third source of SE. This reaction process causes background radiation<br />

and thus a smaller degree of contrast, which, however, can partly be increased again electronically.<br />

(Fig. 4)<br />

Fig. 4: Production of SE and BSE<br />

The best lateral point resolution can be achieved by means of SE1. The signal can be intensified<br />

when the primary beam hits the samples at an angle of < 90°; this is referred to as inclination<br />

contrast. If radiation can penetrate specimen structures such as tips, fibres, or edges, the images of<br />

these structures will be very bright (edge contrast) owing to a high SE yield.<br />

The SE signal, <strong>com</strong>prising all essential information on topography, produces electron-micrographs<br />

of high resolution.<br />

Fig. 5: SE yield δ is dependent on the atomic number Z<br />

2.2.2 Back scattered electrons (BSE)<br />

The electrons escaping from the surface of the sample and having an energy of ≥ 50 eV are<br />

referred to as back scattered electrons (BSE). BSE are produced in the entire interaction volume at<br />

a larger distance to the point of impact of PE (Fig. 4). When atomic numbers are low, the escape<br />

5


Test M604: <strong>Scanning</strong> electron microscopy<br />

level T is approx. half the range R; at accelerating voltages > 20kV and when atomic numbers are<br />

high, the escape level T is lower. The higher the PE energy and the smaller the atomic number of<br />

the specimen material, the more extends the area of production of BSE and the lower the<br />

achievable resolution. However, the dependence on the atomic number of the sample material is<br />

an advantage in that, apart from the topography contrast, a material contrast can be made visible.<br />

Moreover, owing to higher energy charging occurs less frequently than in case of SE.<br />

Fig. 6: RE yield η is dependent on the atomic number Z<br />

2.3 <strong>Scanning</strong> electron microscope (SEM): Design and function<br />

The surface of a specimen is brought into the focus of electron beams. The signals produced<br />

control the brightness of a screen tube such that an image of the surface of the sample appears.<br />

Fig. 7 illustrates the basic design of a scanning electron microscope.<br />

Fig. 7: Basic design of an SEM<br />

In a scanning electron microscope the signal-producing system and the signal-processing system<br />

operate independently.<br />

6


Test M604: <strong>Scanning</strong> electron microscopy<br />

2.3.1 Signal-producing system<br />

The signal-producing system (see Fig. 7 to the left and Fig. 8) is to generate a probe of the<br />

smallest diameter possible and of maximum brightness when hitting the surface of the specimen. It<br />

consists of an electron gun, (cathode – Wehnelt cylinder – anode), lens system (lenses, apertures,<br />

beam deflection coils and stigmator coils) and the specimen chamber.<br />

Fig. 8: Course of the probe in the signal-producing system<br />

At least two pumps are required to reduce pressure to a vacuum. A vane-type rotary pump<br />

produces a pre-vacuum of approx. 10 -3<br />

mbar. Either a turbomolecular pump or an oil diffusion<br />

pump maintain the operation vacuum of at least 10 -5<br />

mbar in the column and in the chamber.<br />

Dependent upon the type of cathode used, a third pump, the ion getter pump, may be operated.<br />

For further information please refer to technical literature!<br />

2.3.1.1 Generation of the probe<br />

In the field of electron microscopy free electrons are usually produced by thermal emission. Other<br />

microscopes operate by means of field emission (> 10 9 V/m). Mostly, tungsten filaments or - as<br />

described here - LaB 6<br />

-crystals serve as cathode. The electron emitter consists of a three-electrode<br />

arrangement (Fig. 9).<br />

7


Test M604: <strong>Scanning</strong> electron microscopy<br />

Fig. 9: Basic design of an electron gun.<br />

An electric heating current heats up the filament on the negative potential (cathode) opposite the<br />

anode. The relevant accelerating voltage accelerates the emitted electrons towards the anode where<br />

they pass through a gap to enter the microscope column. The filament is situated in a Wehnelt<br />

cylinder so that the electrons can be focused. The potential of the Wehnelt cylinder is slightly<br />

more negative than that of the filament. The Wehnelt cylinder focuses the electrons by emitting<br />

them from one point. This point, also referred to as virtual electron emitter or as cross-over, can be<br />

shifted by a variable bias resistance. The Wehnelt cylinder does not only adjust the diameter of the<br />

cross-over but the number of electrons leaving the cathode (emission current).<br />

2.3.1.2 Lens system<br />

Magnetic lenses and various apertures focus the electron beam. When an electron with the<br />

charge e and the velocity v reaches a magnetizing field of the intensity B, force F acts on the<br />

electron such that the force vector F is perpendicular to the velocity vector v and the magnetizing<br />

field vector B.<br />

F = e( B ∧ v)<br />

(7)<br />

Fig.10: Force vectors of a charge moving in the magnetizing field<br />

8


Test M604: <strong>Scanning</strong> electron microscopy<br />

The magnetizing field of an electromagnetic lens can be divided into an axial and a radial part.<br />

The axial part, running in parallel to the direction of movement of the electron, does not influence<br />

the electron. The radial part, however, forces the electron to take a helix-path by the force<br />

(B rad<br />

e v). Thus, due to such circular <strong>com</strong>ponent the velocity vector is influenced by the axial<br />

magnetizing field (B ax<br />

e v zirk<br />

). As a result the radius of the helix-path is be<strong>com</strong>ing ever smaller.<br />

The electromagnetic lenses of an SEM produce an image reduced in diameter of the cross-over in<br />

the gun on the surface of the specimen. Two condenser lenses (Fig. 8) reduce the diameter of the<br />

electron beam (the diameter of the electron beam is also referred to as "probe size") from d 0<br />

to d 2<br />

.<br />

The higher the lens current, the smaller the diameter (Fig. 11).<br />

Fig. 11: Schematic illustration of the probe a) low, b) high lens current<br />

The smaller the probe size, the smaller the portion of electrons reaching the specimen since not all<br />

electrons leaving lens 1 can pass through lens 2. (Fig. 11): α<br />

2<br />

< α1<br />

. Increasing noise results,<br />

limiting the resolving power of the SEM.<br />

The third lens, i.e. the objective lens, focuses the probe towards the specimen.<br />

Lens holes which are not absolutely symmetrical mechanically, whose magnetizing fields are<br />

inhomogeneous, and whose pole piece holes are contaminated, and contaminated apertures in<br />

particular, will result in an elliptical probe producing "axial astigmatism". The surface of the<br />

specimen cannot be brought into focus accurately since an elliptical probe will produce a distorted<br />

image of specimen structures during the focusing process. A corrective magnetic field, required to<br />

recover the rotational symmetry of the probe, is to be produced by a stigmator. A stigmator<br />

consists of 2 times 4 coils arranged centrically towards the optical axis.<br />

2.3.1.3 <strong>Scanning</strong> system / magnification<br />

Beam deflection coils in a scanning generator (Fig. 7) scan the specimen surface by means of the<br />

primary electron beam for a certain period of time; beam deflection coils are installed in the pole<br />

piece duct of the objective lens. Simultaneously a cathode ray scans the screen of a monitor.<br />

Due to the principle of scanning, an SEM lineagraph consists of many spots. The beam deflection<br />

coil can be used to produce horizontal and vertical deflections by means of the electron beam.<br />

Horizontal deflection generates a line whose position is determined by vertical deflection.<br />

9


Test M604: <strong>Scanning</strong> electron microscopy<br />

<strong>Scanning</strong> speed depends on the time set for the scanning of one line and on the number of lines per<br />

scanning process ("frame").<br />

In order to increase magnification the current in the beam deflection coils must be increased. This<br />

involves a reduction of the scanning pattern produced on the specimen, whereas the size of the<br />

image displayed remains unchanged. Thus, magnification results from the ratio between the edge<br />

length of the screen and the edge length of the zone scanned on the specimen (Fig. 7). If, e.g., a<br />

zone of 1mm x 1mm is scanned, while the edge length of the screen is 30 cm, the degree of<br />

magnification will be 300-fold.<br />

2.3.2 Signal-processing system<br />

Fig.12: System of signal processing<br />

Due to the principle of scanning, signals - e.g. secondary electrons - are successively produced by<br />

each object point. After registration by means of a detector an electrical signal, the video signal, is<br />

generated and amplified by a preamplifier and by video amplification. The video signal, such<br />

amplified, modulates the cathode ray deflected simultaneously to the primary electron beam such<br />

that an image appears on the monitor. In this way, there is a spot-by-spot-correlation between the<br />

signal level of an object point and the brightness of the corresponding display spot.<br />

The amplitudes of the signal can be displayed as Y-modulation.<br />

The modulation of object signals to successive electrical signals is advantageous in that the latter<br />

can be modified in order to optimise image information (brightness, contrast etc.).<br />

2.3.3 Detectors<br />

Detectors connect the signal-producing and the signal-processing system of an SEM. They convert<br />

the signals produced (electrons) into electrical signals. As a rule, each signal (secondary electrons,<br />

back scattered electrons, X-rays) requires a special detector.<br />

10


Test M604: <strong>Scanning</strong> electron microscopy<br />

Fig. 13: Everhart - Thornley – Detector<br />

K: Collector, S: Scintillator, LL: Optical fibre, V: Preamplifier, PM: Photo multiplier<br />

The most widely used detector of secondary electrons is the Everhart-Thornley-Detector (Fig. 13).<br />

A driving potential of e.g. +300 to 400 V is applied between the specimen and the collector for the<br />

intake of secondary electrons of low energy. Between collector and scintillator, high voltage of 10<br />

kV is applied, accelerating the SE to <strong>com</strong>e forcibly into contact with the scintillator. The<br />

scintillator consists either of a glass plate coated with luminescent powder (phosphor <strong>com</strong>pound)<br />

or of a YAG- or YAP- monocrystal. The photons produced pass via the optical fibre to the photo<br />

multiplier. The photons release electrons at the photocathode of the multiplier. The multiplier<br />

voltage accelerates these electrons towards the dynodes where they produce cumulatively a<br />

multiple of electrons.<br />

BSE are also detected. If an image is to be produced by BSE only, no SE must be present; the<br />

collector must be switched off or a negative voltage must be applied to repulse the SE.<br />

Scintillator detectors (Robinson detector) or semiconductor detectors are especially in use to detect<br />

BSE.<br />

2.4 Interrelationship between depth of focus, resolution, and magnification<br />

Great depth of focus is required for an analysis of fracture surfaces. The term "depth of focus"<br />

describes that zone of object positions, in which a change in focus cannot be perceived through the<br />

sight. Fig. 14 shows the interrelationship between the depth of focus and the point resolution X or<br />

magnification.<br />

At a 1000-fold magnification, the light-optical microscope can only project a depth of approx.<br />

0.2 µm, whereas 100 µm can be achieved by means of an electron microscope.<br />

11


Test M604: <strong>Scanning</strong> electron microscopy<br />

Fig. 14: Interrelationship between depth of focus, point resolution, and magnification: Light-optical microscope<br />

and scanning electron microscope.<br />

2.5 Fractographic analysis<br />

Any fracture of a body starts with the formation and propagation of cracks in submicroscopic,<br />

microscopic, and eventually macroscopic dimensions. The structure of the fracture surface varies<br />

depending on the <strong>com</strong>position and microstructure of the material in question as well as on other<br />

conditions given during the process of breaking, such as temperature and stress state. Thus an<br />

analysis of the fracture surface can provide essential information on the cause of fracture.<br />

2.5.1 Transgranular and intercrystalline fracture<br />

Metals are <strong>com</strong>posed of a multitude of small crystallites formed when the melt is cooling down.<br />

Atoms are very regularly arranged in the crystallites. At the boundary between two crystallites the<br />

order of the crystal lattice is disarranged. These crystal boundaries show two-dimensional lattice<br />

defects. As the atoms at the crystal boundaries are not in an equilibrium state, the crystal<br />

boundaries in engineering materials are in general of higher strength than those of regular<br />

crystallites. They form a barrier to the propagation of small cracks so that - at room temperature<br />

and at lower temperatures - cracks normally run through the grains. This process is referred to as<br />

transgranular fracture (Figs. 15 a and c).<br />

12


Test M604: <strong>Scanning</strong> electron microscopy<br />

Fig. 15: a) Transgranular cleavage fracture, b) intercrystalline cleavage fracture c) dimple fracture<br />

(transgranular), d) fatigue fracture<br />

Various types of separation occur in brittle and tough material. In the case of transgranular brittle<br />

fracture, crystallites are split without deformation (Fig. 15a). If the material is tough, sliding<br />

processes occur in crystallographically preferred planes; microvoids and cavities form themselves.<br />

The cavities widen, any metal remaining in between propagates and narrow edges are formed. The<br />

resulting microstructure is called dimple fracture, see Fig.15c).<br />

Cyclic straining (cf. Test M512) leads to transgranular cracks showing fracture paths and fatigue<br />

striation (Fig. 15d).<br />

At higher temperatures atoms move more easily, and the strength of crystal boundaries is reduced.<br />

The path of fractures that have occurred after a long time of load at high temperatures runs along<br />

crystal boundaries. Such fractures are referred to as intercrystalline fractures (Fig. 15b); they do<br />

not occur at room temperature unless crystal boundaries have been weakened or embrittled due to<br />

precipitation or impurities. In particular the influence of hydrogen can also lead to intercrystalline<br />

fractures.<br />

3 Technological significance<br />

3.1 Assessment of damage<br />

As has been mentioned in the introduction, scanning electron microscopy is essential to an<br />

assessment of causes of damage due to fracture. Microscopic analysis has made it possible to<br />

distinguish between material defects and processing defects. Thus, considerable legal<br />

consequences may result with regard to liability for damage.<br />

Slag inclusion in welding seams, e.g., cannot be clearly identified using a light-optical microscope<br />

whereas, owing to the fact that the conductivity of metal differs considerably from that of slag,<br />

13


Test M604: <strong>Scanning</strong> electron microscopy<br />

contrasts be<strong>com</strong>e clearly visible when an electron microscope is used. In connection with X-ray<br />

analysis, such slag inclusion can be clearly identified.<br />

Heavy expenses occur to insurance <strong>com</strong>panies, both in the <strong>com</strong>mercial and in the private field, for<br />

the evaluation of damage due to corrosion of water pipes etc. The cause of corrosion can be<br />

determined by electron-microscopic investigation such that e.g. defective connections between<br />

different metals can be located.<br />

3.2 Quality assurance and quality control<br />

<strong>Electron</strong> microscopes are well suitable for controlling and ensuring e.g. a constant surface quality<br />

or a defined roughness of workpieces. However, some disadvantages must be mentioned here, too.<br />

In practice, electron microscopes cannot be integrated directly in a production line as they require<br />

high-vacuum for operation so that usually investigation can only be made by taking samples.<br />

Apart from vacuum resistance, the electric conductivity of the specimen surface is of utmost<br />

importance. Although electric conductivity is easy to achieve by coating even relatively sensitive<br />

organic material with metal or carbon, there are high expenses involved so that a wide application<br />

of this method would be disadvantageous. Meanwhile the development of atomic force<br />

microscopy has be<strong>com</strong>e a <strong>com</strong>petitive alternative as far as topographic investigation is concerned:<br />

The forces of attraction acting between the specimen surface and the measuring prod are<br />

determined in atomic dimensions.<br />

3.3 Medical examination and biological investigation<br />

Particularly in the field of medical and biologic research, electron microscopy has enormously<br />

contributed to improve examination and investigation. Here, low-vacuum units have been<br />

developed, enabling the investigation of non-conducting, hydrous, organic preparations. The great<br />

depth of focus is not as important as the fact that the 1000-fold magnification achieved by an<br />

optical microscope can be exceeded.<br />

4 Testing<br />

In the course of this test you are to analyse and <strong>com</strong>pare the differing fracture behaviour of<br />

metallic and polymeric materials in order to give an example of scanning electron microscopy as<br />

frequently used in practice. Use the surfaces of fracture obtained as a result of other tests<br />

conducted in this laboratory course, e.g. the tensile test or the notched-bar impact test. As far as<br />

metals are concerned use the samples cut to adequate size (no further preparation necessary). In<br />

case of polymeric materials, insulators are usually used. Prior to testing, coat the specimen<br />

surfaces with a thin film of precious metal to prevent charging. For this purpose a low-vacuum<br />

cathode sputtering unit is available<br />

Do not operate the electron microscope and the cathode sputtering unit unless the adviser is<br />

present. Follow the instructions to the letter!<br />

For purposes of documentation and later evaluation store and print typical images of the specimen<br />

you have tested.<br />

Carefully note down in writing information obtained and experience gained during the laboratory<br />

course!<br />

Specimen<br />

The adviser will hand over the specimen to you.<br />

Testing equipment<br />

<strong>Scanning</strong> electron microscope SEM XL30 (Philips)<br />

Cathode sputtering unit SCD 050 (Baltec)<br />

14


Test M604: <strong>Scanning</strong> electron microscopy<br />

5 Evaluation of testing<br />

Prior to giving your results, describe in detail the theory of the electron microscope. Describe<br />

experience gained and information obtained from the specimen, referring to theory. If necessary,<br />

consult technical literature.<br />

Describe the individual fracture behaviour of each specimen. Determine - to the extent possible -<br />

the average dimensions of characteristic features such as size of crystallite, size of dimple, fatigue<br />

striation. Briefly describe the differing material properties or conditions of fracture, respectively,<br />

that have caused the surfaces of fracture you observed.<br />

6 Questions<br />

• How can the range of usage of a light-optical microscope be extended<br />

• Which are the advantages/ disadvantages of transmission electron microscopy (TEM) in<br />

<strong>com</strong>parison to scanning electron microscopy (SEM)<br />

• Which are the scattering types that can occur at atoms in case of accelerated electrons Give<br />

some examples!<br />

• Field emission SEM: Describe the principle! Which are the advantages of this method<br />

7 Bibliography<br />

• Macherauch, Eckard: Praktikum in Werkstoffkunde (Laboratory course in<br />

metallography); Publishing house: F. Vieweg & Sohn,<br />

Braunschweig / Wiesbaden 1992<br />

• Flegler, Heckman, Klomparens: Elektronenmikroskopie (<strong>Electron</strong> microscopy);<br />

Publishing house: Spektrum Akademischer Verlag,<br />

Heidelberg 1995<br />

• L. Reimer, G. Pfefferkorn: Rasterelektronenmikroskopie (<strong>Scanning</strong> electron<br />

microscopy); Publishing house: Springer-Verlag,<br />

Berlin 1977<br />

• L. Engel, H. Klingele: Rasterelektronenmikroskopische Untersuchungen von<br />

Metallschäden (<strong>Scanning</strong> electron microscopy used for<br />

the inspection of damage to metal), Publishing house:<br />

Gerling, Köln 1982<br />

• W. Schatt.: Einführung in die Werkstoffwissenschaft (Introduction to<br />

materials science), Publishing house: Deutscher Verlag<br />

für Grundstoffindustrie, Leipzig 1972<br />

• E. Hornbogen, B. Skrotzki Werkstoffmikroskopie (Materials microscopy),<br />

Publishing house: Springer Verlag, Berlin 1993<br />

15


Test M604: <strong>Scanning</strong> electron microscopy<br />

Abbildungen des Versuchs M604<br />

Abb. 3<br />

Primärelektronenstrahl<br />

primary electron beam<br />

1 mm Auger Elektronen Auger electrons, 1 mm<br />

Rückstreuelektronen<br />

back scattered electrons<br />

Charakterische Röntgenstrahlung<br />

characteristic X-radiation<br />

Röntgenstrahlung: Kontinuum<br />

X-radiation: continuum<br />

Sekundäre Fluoreszenz (Kontinuum und<br />

charakteristische Röntgenstrahlung)<br />

Secondary fluorescence (continuum and<br />

characteristic X-radiation)<br />

RE-Auflösung<br />

BSE resolution<br />

Röntgenstrahlung, Auflösung<br />

X-radiation, resolution<br />

Abb. 4<br />

Wandung<br />

wall<br />

zum Detektor<br />

towards detector<br />

Probenoberfläche<br />

specimen surface<br />

Austrittstiefe<br />

escape level<br />

Reichweite<br />

range<br />

Elektronendiffusionswolke<br />

electron diffusion cloud<br />

Abb. 5<br />

Ordnungszahl<br />

atomic number<br />

Abb. 7<br />

Elektronenstrahl<br />

electron beam<br />

Kondensorlinsen<br />

condenser lenses<br />

Ablenkspulen<br />

beam deflection coils<br />

Objektivlinse<br />

objective lens<br />

Probe<br />

specimen<br />

Verstärker<br />

amplifier<br />

Rastereinheit<br />

scanning unit<br />

Signaldetektor<br />

signal detector<br />

Sichtbildschirm<br />

screen<br />

Abb. 8<br />

Kathode<br />

cathode<br />

Wehneltzylinder<br />

Wehnelt cylinder<br />

Anode<br />

anode<br />

Sprayblende<br />

dispersion aperture<br />

Kondensorlinse<br />

condenser lens<br />

Stigmator<br />

stigmator<br />

Objektiv<br />

objective<br />

Bildfeinverschiebung<br />

fine-adjustment of micrograph<br />

Aperturblende<br />

aperture diaphragm<br />

Probe<br />

specimen<br />

Abb. 9<br />

Elektronenkanone<br />

electron gun<br />

Hochspannungskabel<br />

high-voltage cable<br />

Keramikisolator<br />

ceramic insulator<br />

Wolframdrahtfaden<br />

tungsten filament<br />

16


Test M604: <strong>Scanning</strong> electron microscopy<br />

Vakuumdichtung<br />

Abschirmung oder Wehneltzylinder<br />

Anode<br />

Abb. 11<br />

Linse<br />

Abb. 12<br />

Elektronen-optische Parameter<br />

Vorverstärker<br />

Videoverstärker<br />

Kontrast<br />

Helligkeit<br />

Differenzierung<br />

Inversion<br />

Oszillograph<br />

weiß<br />

schwarz<br />

Photobildschirm<br />

Beobachtungsbildschirm<br />

Abb. 14<br />

Punktauflösung<br />

Schärfentiefe<br />

REM<br />

Förderliche Vergrößerung<br />

Betr. Querverweis auf M512<br />

transkristallin<br />

(in M512 engl. "transcrystalline")<br />

interkristallin<br />

Bruchbahnen<br />

(in M512 eng. "slip planes")<br />

Schwingungsstreifen<br />

(in M512 engl. "nodal lines")<br />

vacuum seal<br />

shielding or Wehnelt cylinder<br />

anode<br />

lens<br />

electron-optical parameters<br />

preamplifier<br />

video amplification<br />

contrast<br />

brightness<br />

differentiation<br />

inversion<br />

oscillograph<br />

white<br />

black<br />

screen / micrographs<br />

screen<br />

point resolution<br />

depth of focus<br />

SEM<br />

useful magnification<br />

M604<br />

transgranular<br />

intercrystalline<br />

fracture paths<br />

fatigue striation<br />

17

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!