Untitled - Africa Centre for Open Governance

Following the release of this audit report, various development partners demanded a return of
their money. The Kenya Government has so far refunded the following amounts:
1. Department for International Development (DFID), United Kingdom - KES 164.5 million
2. World Bank - KES 144.2 million
3. The Canadian International Development Agency (CIDA), Canada - KES 47.5 million; and
4. The United Nations Children’s Fund (UNICEF) - KES 1.8 million 59
The Government has also committed to refund the Fast Track Initiative (through the World Bank)
over KES 2 Billion. 60
The refund of these monies to the donor organizations, using taxpayers’ money, not only presents
a worrying trend of the Government, in effect, underwriting corruption, but also takes away funds
that are vital for providing basic services.
In addition, though the Minister reported that the names of those culpable were known and
that their particulars had been forwarded to relevant state agencies, no legal proceedings were
instituted in 2011 to hold them to account. The inaction of the Government in prosecuting those
involved reflects badly upon its declared commitment to fighting corruption and improving
public service delivery for Kenyans.
4.1.2. Operation Linda Nchi (OLN)
In early October 2011 Kenya invoked Article 51 of the United Nations Charter on the right to
self-defence and embarked on a war on Al Shabaab in what has been described as the biggest
security gamble Kenya has taken since independence. Al Shabaab is a radical “Islamist” group that
had gained control of most of southern and central Somalia, and was fighting an insurgency
against the Transitional Federal Government (TFG) of Somalia. The decision appears to have
been made hastily without adequate political, diplomatic, and military preparation, leading to
unnecessary diplomatic tensions, unclear planning and goals, and avoidable delays and setbacks.
Parliamentary approval was not sought for this very costly venture and some were of the opinion
that the justifications behind it were weak. 61
Questions were raised on the constitutionality of the operation. Under the 2010 constitution, a
declaration of war must be made by the President and approved by Parliament. Under Article 134
(4) on the functions of the President, the constitution provides that the President may, subject to
Article 58, declare a state of emergency and also with the approval of Parliament, declare war. In
violation of this constitutional provision, the nation was initially informed about OLN through a
press conference by the Ministers for Internal Security and Defence.
The Government belatedly sought to address the apparent constitutional breach. It was at pains
to explain the Kenya Defence Forces and the Kenya Government were not at war but were
conducting a military operation engaging the Al Shabaab in defence of the sovereignty and the
territorial integrity of the Republic.
59 Walter Menya, “Treasury Refunds Sh2.6bn Donor Cash,” http://www.nation.co.ke/News/Treasury+refunds+Sh2bn+dono
r+cash+/-/1056/1266894/-/8o7j7vz/-/ (November 2011)
60 Interview undertaken on 15-11-2011
61 International Crisis Group, “The Kenya Military Intervention in Somalia”, Africa Report No.184, February 2012
27