15.01.2015 Views

Referral-to-Treatment for Surgical Carpal Tunnel ... - 18 Weeks

Referral-to-Treatment for Surgical Carpal Tunnel ... - 18 Weeks

Referral-to-Treatment for Surgical Carpal Tunnel ... - 18 Weeks

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Musculoskeletal Audit (MSk) - <strong>Carpal</strong> <strong>Tunnel</strong> Surgery<br />

B) <strong>Referral</strong> <strong>to</strong> Outpatient Appointment<br />

92% of 1021 patients with documented length of time from <strong>Referral</strong> <strong>to</strong> Outpatient Appointment were seen<br />

within 15 weeks (Fig. 5). However, a large proportion of patients waited <strong>for</strong> 10 <strong>to</strong> 15 weeks be<strong>for</strong>e their<br />

Outpatient Appointment, leaving little time in the proposed <strong>18</strong> week pathway <strong>for</strong> investigations<br />

and/or treatment <strong>to</strong> occur.<br />

Fig. 5: Length of time from <strong>Referral</strong> <strong>to</strong> Outpatient Appointment<br />

Percentage of patients<br />

100<br />

80<br />

60<br />

40<br />

20<br />

0<br />

Wishaw<br />

GRI/S<strong>to</strong>bhill<br />

DGRI/Garrick<br />

QMH/Vic<strong>to</strong>ria<br />

Elgin<br />

Borders<br />

Ninewells/Stra<br />

RAH/VOL<br />

ARI/Woodend<br />

Perth<br />

Monklands<br />

Hairmyres<br />

St Johns/RIE<br />

Raigmore<br />

IRH/Dunoon<br />

Forth Valley<br />

All patients<br />

15 weeks Missing data<br />

Fig. 5 includes all patients irrespective of any reason <strong>for</strong> delay, and reflects the 15-week target <strong>for</strong> referral <strong>to</strong> Outpatient<br />

Appointment in operation at the start of the audit period. Comparison against the 12-week target times which came in<strong>to</strong><br />

place in March 2010 are available on request<br />

Although it was usually possible <strong>to</strong> find out who vetted patients and the vetting outcome, in many hospitals<br />

first vetting date was often unavailable (Table 2). This may improve with the introduction of e-vetting in some<br />

sites, and recording of vetting dates by whichever method has increased from 42% during the arthroscopy<br />

audit <strong>to</strong> 61% during the CTS audit period. Amongst patients whose vetting times were known, 91% of<br />

patients were vetted within a week (Table 2).<br />

Table 2: Average time from <strong>Referral</strong> <strong>to</strong> First Vetting<br />

% of patients whose vetting<br />

dates was documented<br />

Number of patients<br />

documented<br />

<strong>Referral</strong> <strong>to</strong> vetting<br />

Mean<br />

(weeks)<br />

% > 1<br />

week<br />

Wishaw 0% 0 - -<br />

GRI/S<strong>to</strong>bhill 92% 60 0.0 0%<br />

DGRI/Garrick 100% 64 0.0 0%<br />

QMH/Vic<strong>to</strong>ria 65% 51 1.4 53%<br />

Elgin 21% 5 0.0 0%<br />

Borders 96% 55 0.0 0%<br />

Ninewells/Stracathro 28% 22 0.4 5%<br />

RAH/VOL 28% 20 1.2 50%<br />

ARI/Woodend 7% 4 * *<br />

Perth 89% 17 0.2 0%<br />

Monklands 78% 31 0.9 19%<br />

Hairmyres 21% 19 0.8 16%<br />

St Johns/RIE 96% 146 0.1 1%<br />

Raigmore 89% 55 0.1 0%<br />

Inverclyde/Dunoon 66% 31 0.6 0%<br />

Forth Valley 37% 20 0.7 15%<br />

All patients 61% 600 0.3 9%<br />

* Data omitted if based on fewer than 5 patients<br />

- - 6

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!