16.01.2015 Views

Policy Roundtable Abstracts - AcademyHealth

Policy Roundtable Abstracts - AcademyHealth

Policy Roundtable Abstracts - AcademyHealth

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

PROPOSED PANEL The panel will feature four<br />

leaders from four very different states: Kimberly Belshe<br />

(CA), Jane Cline (WV), Bruce Greenstein (LA), and Joan<br />

Henneberry (CO). It will be moderated by Anne Gauthier<br />

(NASHP), who will present a short overview of the<br />

critical policy choices states are facing in creating<br />

exchanges. She will then conduct an interactive<br />

discussion among these state policymakers, covering<br />

their diverse approaches in addressing the following key<br />

policy issues in exchange design and implementation:<br />

1)Development of an overall vision for the exchange: To<br />

best take advantage of the tools and flexibility states<br />

have been given through ACA in creating their<br />

exchange, they must first decide what policy goals they<br />

may wish to accomplish with their exchange. An<br />

effective exchange could give meaning to the<br />

affordability standards in the federal law, and could be a<br />

force for efficiency and an orientation toward quality in<br />

the insurance and health delivery sectors. However,<br />

such outcomes do not arise naturally or automatically<br />

from the creation of an exchange. States must be active<br />

and at times aggressive in administering the exchange.<br />

2) Exchange governance structure: The exchange<br />

governance structure – whether a state agency, a quasipublic<br />

agency, or an independent not-for-profit – will<br />

have an important impact on which voices are heard<br />

most clearly when key decisions are made. Furthermore,<br />

the location of a state’s governance structure could have<br />

important implications for how nimble an exchange might<br />

be, the power it will have in leveraging contracts with<br />

both health plans and IT vendors, and how effectively it<br />

can monitor the exchange appeals process. 3) Eligibility<br />

and enrollment: An exchange must be capable of<br />

determining whether a given individual is eligible a<br />

subsidy or is eligible for other programs such Medicaid<br />

and CHIP. States will need to think about how their<br />

populations might transition between programs as their<br />

eligibility for various programs changes over time in<br />

order to ensure the receipt of continuous care. Many<br />

states need to consider the role of county workers and<br />

the interface with social service programs. And the vision<br />

of a first-class customer experience, with as much<br />

reliance on electronic interface as possible, presents<br />

numerous challenges and design options for states. How<br />

the exchange handles transitions of eligibility between<br />

employer-sponsored coverage, exchange coverage and<br />

Medicaid will determine whether consumers received<br />

continuous care from their providers as their income<br />

varies. 4 )Tools to promote affordability: How the state<br />

selects participating health plans will affect how<br />

effectively market forces will be brought to bear to<br />

improve quality and reduce costs. States may span the<br />

spectrum on how involved they may be in regulating plan<br />

participation within the exchange. Some may choose to<br />

have their exchange structured as an open marketplace<br />

where all federally qualified health plans may compete<br />

for their market share. On the other side of the spectrum,<br />

states may leverage their capacity as active purchasers<br />

of health to encourage or reward high value plans.<br />

States will also need to consider implementing riskadjustment<br />

mechanisms and controls for adverse<br />

selection, so that insurance markets will not only be<br />

affordable for even those high health needs, but also<br />

sustainable into the future. 5) Stakeholder engagement:<br />

The decisions that states make about exchanges are<br />

important to a myriad of stakeholders including<br />

consumers, health plans, employers, and health care<br />

providers. Each is likely to have differing views regarding<br />

exchange operations and goals, as well as differing<br />

understanding of how various design choices will affect<br />

them and the health care delivery system. It is important<br />

for states to identify their key stakeholders as well as the<br />

best ways to engage them in order to gain support and<br />

perspective on exchange development.<br />

PANELISTS The panelists bring rich<br />

perspectives and experience to these issues. Anne<br />

Gauthier currently directs several projects at the<br />

forefront of supporting states developing exchanges and<br />

is one of NASHP’s lead staff on interactions with federal<br />

officials on reform implementation. Through her work<br />

under HRSA’s State Health Access Program (SHAP),<br />

she is working with 13 states to expand coverage and<br />

implement reform and led a national webinar with over<br />

500 attendees in a format similar to that proposed here.<br />

She has also been an active participant in the Center for<br />

Consumer Information and Insurance Oversight’s<br />

(formerly OCIIO) early efforts to increase awareness of<br />

critical exchange issues, including, a presentation on<br />

exchange governance structures on OCIIO’s Technical<br />

Assistance Webinar Series in November 2010. She is<br />

also the project director of the recently launched State<br />

Health Exchange Leadership Network, a peer-to-peer<br />

learning community for state officials working on<br />

exchange implementation. In December 2010, Kimberly<br />

Belshé was appointed to the board of California’s newly<br />

established Health Benefits Exchange. Previously, Ms.<br />

Belshé served as Secretary of California’s Health and<br />

Human Service Agency, playing a critical role in the<br />

state’s recent passage of exchange enacting legislation.<br />

Additionally, she serves as chair of the Governor’s Task<br />

Force on Health Care Reform Implementation. Jane L.<br />

Cline is West Virginia’s Insurance Commissioner. In<br />

addition, Ms. Cline serves as President of the National<br />

Association of Insurance Commissioners (NAIC), as well<br />

as Chair of the Management Committee of the Interstate<br />

Insurance Product Regulation Commission. In her role at<br />

the NAIC, she has led the development of model<br />

legislation to implement the Affordable Care Act. Bruce<br />

Greenstein is Secretary of Louisiana’s largest agency,<br />

the Department of Health and Hospitals. Secretary<br />

Greenstein manages a budget of over $8 billion and will<br />

provide oversight and services in mental health, public<br />

health, emergency preparedness, Medicaid, health<br />

information technology, addictive disorders and aging<br />

services. Joan Henneberry was appointed in late 2010 to<br />

lead Colorado’s exchange efforts under the new<br />

governor. She recently left her position under the<br />

previous governor as Executive Director for Colorado’s<br />

Department of Health Care <strong>Policy</strong> and Financing and as<br />

senior health policy advisor to the Governor, developing<br />

and implementing health reform policies and initiatives.<br />

She also spent seven years at the National Governors<br />

Association providing consultation to states on health

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!