16.01.2015 Views

Econometrics I

Econometrics I

Econometrics I

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

form):<br />

log(salary) = β 0 + β 1 log(sales) + β 2 roe + β 3 ros + u<br />

(a) In terms of the model parameters, state the null hypothesis that, after controlling for<br />

sales and roe, ros has no effect on CEO salary. State the alternative that better stock<br />

market performance increases a CEOs salary.<br />

(b) Using the data in CEOSAL1.RAW, the following equation was obtained by OLS:<br />

̂ log(salary) = 4.32 + .280 log(sales) + .0174roe + .00024ros<br />

(.32) (.035) (.0041) (.00054)<br />

n = 209, R 2 = 0.283.<br />

By what percentage is salary predicted to increase if ros increases by 50 points Does<br />

ros have a practically large effect on salary<br />

(c) Test the null hypothesis that ros has no effect on salary against the alternative that<br />

ros has a positive effect. Carry out the test at the 10% significance level.<br />

(d) Would you include ros in a final model explaining CEO compensation in terms of firm<br />

performance Explain.<br />

4. Wooldridge C3.6<br />

2

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!