17.01.2015 Views

April to June 2013 For PDF.pmd - Orissa High Court

April to June 2013 For PDF.pmd - Orissa High Court

April to June 2013 For PDF.pmd - Orissa High Court

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

24<br />

<strong>Court</strong><br />

News<br />

BASIL LAKRA V. STATE OF ORISSA<br />

JCRLA NO.21 OF 2004 (Dt.27.06.<strong>2013</strong>)<br />

PENAL CODE, 1860 – S.376 (2) (f)<br />

Rape – Appellant sentenced <strong>to</strong> R.I. for life and <strong>to</strong> pay fine of Rs.10,000/- and in default <strong>to</strong> undergo<br />

R.I. for six months – Reduction of sentence – Victim was less than 12 years and the appellant was 45<br />

years at the time of occurrence – Both belong <strong>to</strong> Schedule Tribe community and reside in the remote back<br />

ward area of the State – Not warranted maximum sentence prescribed – This <strong>Court</strong> has also taken note<br />

of that the appellant is a poor tribal and is not in a position <strong>to</strong> pay such huge amount of fine which is<br />

not disputed by the State – Held, sentence of life imprisonment is modified <strong>to</strong> R.I. for 10 years and the<br />

appellant is exempted from payment of fine.<br />

(Sanju Panda, J. & Dr. B.R.Sarangi, J.)<br />

TACHHU @ KACHHU ROUT & ORS. -V- JAYANTI BISWAL & ANR.<br />

CRLMC NO.(S) 2187 & 2188 OF 2008 (Dt.28.06.<strong>2013</strong>)<br />

CRIMINAL PROCEDURE CODE, 1973 – S.482<br />

Case and counter case filed by co-villagers and the matter has been amicably settled between them<br />

– The object of Penal Law is not merely punitive and one of the objects is <strong>to</strong> maintain peace and harmony<br />

in the society – Since the parties do not want <strong>to</strong> prosecute each other it would not be in the interest of<br />

justice <strong>to</strong> continue the criminal proceedings – Held, the impugned criminal proceedings are quashed.<br />

(Dr. B. R. Sarangi, J.)<br />

M/S. HOTEL SHEELA TOWERS (P) LTD. -V-<br />

ORISSA ELECTRICITY REGULATORY COMMISSION & ORS.<br />

W.P.(C) NO. 266 OF 2008 (WITH BATCH) (Dt.28.06.<strong>2013</strong>)<br />

ODISHA ELECTRICITY REFORMS ACT, 1995 : S.39<br />

Hotel Industry – As per Industrial Policy Resolutions 1996, hotels supplied power by charging<br />

industrial tariff rate – Such incentive not available in I.P.R. 2001 and 2007 – Order passed by OERC Dt.<br />

22.03.2005 reclassifying the petitioner hotel as commercial tariff instead of industrial tariff is challenged<br />

– Held, since the benefits the petitioners are getting under I.P.R. 1996, not extended <strong>to</strong> them, it is open<br />

for the petitioners <strong>to</strong> challenge the order of the OERC u/s 39 of the Act.<br />

(Sanju Panda, J.)

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!