18.01.2015 Views

WRWA Newsletter.pub - Wisconsin Writers Association

WRWA Newsletter.pub - Wisconsin Writers Association

WRWA Newsletter.pub - Wisconsin Writers Association

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Some Reflections on the <strong>WRWA</strong> Jade Ring Contest, 2006 – Poetry Category<br />

by LaMoine MacLaughlin, First Poet Laureate of Amery, <strong>Wisconsin</strong> – 2006 Poetry Judge<br />

Page 33<br />

The Poetry Category of the 2006 Jade Ring Contest included<br />

135 entries by 52 writers. I was delighted to be able to<br />

judge this category and, after review of the material, I would<br />

like to offer several recommendations. Specific comments on<br />

each winning entry are included at the end.<br />

First, I would suggest that in the future a separate category<br />

be considered for humorous verse. Judging humorous verse<br />

along with more serious poetry is really weighing apples<br />

against oranges (or perhaps watermelons against cherries).<br />

The humorous verse will usually be judged second best. Humorous<br />

verse possesses its own unique set of standards and<br />

should be appreciated for those special qualities and characteristics<br />

contained within its special genre. I mention this because<br />

there was some very good humorous verse among the<br />

poems I read and judged, but they don’t show up on the final<br />

screen. Humorous verse deserves its own separate category. I<br />

believe that <strong>WRWA</strong> should separate humorous verse from the<br />

rest of poetry for the same reasons that it separates prose into<br />

various categories.<br />

Second, and I suppose this is one curse of living in the age<br />

of Harry Potter, so much of what tries to pass as poetry in our<br />

time gives evidence that contemporary writers trying to write<br />

poetry do not read very much poetry—at least their poetry<br />

reflects that they have given up reading the great past masters.<br />

Our manic preoccupation with development of an individual<br />

style does not give us the right to suspend the principles of<br />

good writing, which have always involved clarity of expression,<br />

considerate communication with our audience, and careful<br />

crafting of our material. I remember one of my teachers<br />

reminding us that the more we try to be different, the more we<br />

look like everyone else. There is no place for purposeless misspelling,<br />

and improper usage is grammatically incorrect in<br />

poetry as well as in prose. The basic principles of good writing<br />

apply equally to prose and to poetry. We don’t have<br />

enough time to read everything, so I would urge writers to<br />

develop their models by reading the best. Read Blake, and<br />

Keats, and Whitman, and Dickinson, and Yeats, and Frost,<br />

and Roethke, and Wright. And when you finish them, reread<br />

them.<br />

Third, and I suppose this is another curse of our early 21 st<br />

century, so much of what tries to pass as poetry in our time<br />

gives evidence that it is written totally as individual expression<br />

with little or no care for writing as communication designed<br />

to reach another human being as audience. An audience<br />

presumes a concern for community and for communication,<br />

and many writers have written of the disintegration of the<br />

concept of community during the last half of the 20 th century.<br />

The danger, of course, is that the concept of community will<br />

eventually drop from our vocabulary and it will altogether<br />

vanish from our consciousness. Moreover recent disasters<br />

have shown the extreme fragility of the fabric of community<br />

in urban areas. As human beings we all need community, real<br />

community, and it is far too important a concept to be allowed<br />

to disappear.<br />

Sometimes, as contemporary poets, we seem to have lost<br />

our sense of audience and believe that if a reader doesn’t un-<br />

derstand our poetry, that is not our problem; we have done our<br />

part. Sometimes it seems as if aspiring poets believe that writing<br />

poetry frees them from the need to communicate.<br />

Writing poetry is serious work and does not free anyone to<br />

be a bad writer. As writers, we all need community, real community,<br />

to keep us honest and to keep us truly communicating<br />

with other human beings. Sometimes we refer to virtual<br />

(almost, but not quite) reality and at times we seem unable to<br />

distinguish it from genuine reality. As writers, and perhaps<br />

especially as poets, we need to reclaim our local communities<br />

as the source of our audience and our touchstone for authentic<br />

communication. Without a real audience, so much that tries to<br />

pass as poetry degenerates into cutesy-pie word-play or incoherent,<br />

meaningless babble. How about considering the following:<br />

Talk with your Mayor about establishing the position of Poet<br />

Laureate in your village or city. Shamelessly proselytize for<br />

poetry. Become your town’s wild poetry prophet.<br />

Visit your local schools and help teachers spread poetry<br />

throughout their classes.<br />

Run for school board or city council. I might even accept<br />

church council. You might not win, but try it anyhow. Do<br />

something to enter deeply into the life of your local community.<br />

Read Vachel Lindsay’s “The Gospel of Beauty.”<br />

Get a group of friends together and share one of your poems<br />

with them. Ask them to respond to the poem. Or perhaps<br />

read it aloud in a local park or coffee shop for people you<br />

don’t know. Ask them to respond.<br />

And let us never forget William Faulkner’s 1949 Nobel<br />

Prize Acceptance Speech in which he eloquently states the<br />

reasons why poetry is so important:<br />

I believe that man will not merely endure: he will prevail.<br />

He is immortal, not because he alone among creatures<br />

has an inexhaustible voice, but because he has a<br />

soul, a spirit capable of compassion and sacrifice and<br />

endurance. The poet’s, the writer’s, duty is to write about<br />

these things. It is his privilege to help man endure by<br />

lifting his heart, by reminding him of the courage and<br />

honor and hope and pride and compassion and pity and<br />

sacrifice which have been the glory of his past. The<br />

poet’s voice need not merely be the record of man, it can<br />

be one of the props, the pillars to help him endure and<br />

prevail.<br />

Finally, having said all this, I must commend those poets I<br />

have selected as my top three choices and honorable mention<br />

recipients. Their poetry ranges from traditional forms to free<br />

verse, but all of it is thoughtfully developed and carefully<br />

crafted. I have reread all of these poems dozens of times and<br />

they remain new and fresh with each reading—a hallmark, I<br />

believe, of good writing. Bravo! And thank you.<br />

Winning Entry Poems:<br />

First Place: “The Ascent of Icarus” (Jade Ring Winner)<br />

This very carefully crafted sonnet of rhyming couplets<br />

(continued on next page)

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!