19.01.2015 Views

ARCHAEOLOGICAL EVALUATION - Mike Griffiths and Associates

ARCHAEOLOGICAL EVALUATION - Mike Griffiths and Associates

ARCHAEOLOGICAL EVALUATION - Mike Griffiths and Associates

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

FAS_lbf01.wpd 144<br />

8.2.28 Intervention 34<br />

Intervention 34 was situated c.16.55m to the north of<br />

Intervention 33, measured 100m x 4m <strong>and</strong> was designed to<br />

intersect a linear cropmark <strong>and</strong> several geophysical anomalies<br />

(Intervention 4, F5, Intervention 5, F35 <strong>and</strong> F36) (see Figure<br />

36). The trench was machine excavated <strong>and</strong> orientated eastwest<br />

(Plate 42). The local ground surface was relatively level<br />

at c.41.20m AOD. Ploughsoil (C1123) consisted of a<br />

yellowish-brown gravel <strong>and</strong> clayey silt <strong>and</strong> was found to be<br />

between 0.30-0.35m deep. C1123 overlay the natural subsoil<br />

which consisted of an homogenous well-drained orangishbrown<br />

gravel <strong>and</strong> clayey silt which was consistent over the<br />

whole of the trench (C1124).<br />

Plate 42 Intervention 34 looking east (scale<br />

2m)<br />

Two features were defined within Intervention 34, F48 <strong>and</strong> F50 (Figure 91). F48 was located 50.80m from the<br />

western end of the intervention <strong>and</strong> appeared as a butt-ending linear deposit of brown silt. Upon excavation it<br />

proved to be a possible butt-ending feature with moderately sloping sides <strong>and</strong> measuring 1.00m wide x 2.00m<br />

visible length (Figure 92). F48 had been backfilled once with C1246, a firm brown s<strong>and</strong>y silt with rare mixed<br />

gravel <strong>and</strong> pebble inclusions which was otherwise sterile. F48 was interpreted as a possible furrow or ditch;<br />

no dateable material was recovered during excavation.<br />

F50 was situated 24.60m from the eastern end of the intervention <strong>and</strong> was defined as a circular deposit of brown<br />

s<strong>and</strong>y silt. The feature was half-sectioned east-west <strong>and</strong> the southern half removed where it proved to be a pit<br />

measuring 1.40m in diameter but only 0.19m deep (Figure 93). The pit had been backfilled once with C1248,<br />

a brown s<strong>and</strong>y silt deposit which was flecked with mineralisation throughout. The deposit had merged with the<br />

surrounding subsoil making definition <strong>and</strong> feature identification difficult. F50 was interpreted as a small<br />

possible pit; no dateable material was recovered during excavation.<br />

8.2.29 Intervention 35<br />

Intervention 35 was situated towards the central area, <strong>and</strong> the<br />

southern boundary, of Zone A (see Figure 36). The trench was<br />

machine excavated <strong>and</strong> measured 100m x 4m, orientated northsouth<br />

(Plate 43). Ground surface within the area of the trench<br />

was 40.90m AOD. The yellowish-brown gravel <strong>and</strong> clayey silt<br />

ploughsoil (C1123) was found to be c.0.30m deep. This overlay<br />

the natural subsoil which consisted of an homogenous orangishbrown<br />

gravel <strong>and</strong> clayey silt subsoil which included areas <strong>and</strong><br />

b<strong>and</strong>s of mineralisation throughout the trench (C1124).<br />

No features were defined within Intervention 35.<br />

Plate 43 Intervention 35 looking south (scale<br />

2m)<br />

FIELD ARCHAEOLOGY SPECIALISTS

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!